Circumcision Treatment & Management
- Author: Carlos A Angel, MD; Chief Editor: Ted Rosenkrantz, MD more...
Medical Care
Daily cleaning, without forceful retraction of the foreskin, is the only treatment necessary for phimosis in patients without urinary obstruction, hematuria, or preputial pain.
Treatment with topical corticosteroids is effective in separating the loose adhesions found between the glans and the foreskin.
In 2001, French researchers Berdeu et al used data from form published reports and from claims by private hospitals for children younger than 13 years. They found that topical application of clobetasol or 0.05% betamethasone cream 2 times/day to the foreskin and glans for 4-8 weeks was effective in allowing full retraction of the foreskin in 85% (range, 70-100%) of the patients who had a mean age of 5 years at inclusion. The 15% failure rate was attributed to verifiable cases of lichen scleroticas et atrophicus or nonspecific chronic inflammatory processes. Success was achieved at approximately 10% of the cost of operative circumcision; this result showed a considerable cost-effectiveness with this approach.[8]
Surgical Care
Although several techniques are used in neonatal circumcision, all of the methods involve the following common elements:
- Estimation of the amount of foreskin to be removed
- Dilation of the preputial orifice to determine the presence of a normal glans and penis without any evidence of hypospadias, epispadias, chordee, or other anomalies
- Blunt separation of the inner preputial epithelium from the glans
- Placement of a device designed to ensure hemostasis
- Removal of the foreskin
The 3 most common devices used to date are the Gomco clamp (67%), the Plastibell device (19%), and the Mogen clamp (10%). Both the Gomco clamp and the Mogen clamp are excellent instruments for infants but should not be used in toddlers who weigh more than 5 kg because of an increased risk of bleeding. Cosmetic results are excellent with any of these devices if they are used correctly.
In the authors' experience, the Plastibell technique can be used safely for office circumcisions in children up to 10 kg under local anesthesia because this technique induces tissue necrosis by means of suture compression of the foreskin over a plastic ring that protects the glans. Thus, adequate hemostasis is ensured in the older child. The skin sloughs off in 5-7 days, and the ring separates.
The videos below depict circumcision technique in an older child.
Retracting the foreskin with a dorsal slit and marking the area to be incised. Video courtesy of Pamela I Ellsworth, MD. Sleeve technique with electrocautery. Video courtesy of Pamela I Ellsworth, MD. Suturing the mucosal collar to the penile shaft skin circumferentially. Video courtesy of Pamela I Ellsworth, MD. Circumcision complete. Video courtesy of Pamela I Ellsworth, MD.Lannon CM, Bailey AGB, Fleischman AR. Circumcision policy statement. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics. Mar 1999;103(3):686-93. [Medline].
Wiswell TE, Hachey WE. Urinary tract infections and the uncircumcised state: an update. Clin Pediatr (Phila). Mar 1993;32(3):130-4. [Medline].
Alanis MC, Lucidi RS. Neonatal circumcision: a review of the world's oldest and most controversial operation. Obstet Gynecol Surv. May 2004;59(5):379-95. [Medline].
Weiss HA, Quigley MA, Hayes RJ. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2000;14(15):2361-70. [Medline].
Bailey RC, Neema S, Othieno R. Sexual behaviors and other HIV risk factors in circumcised and uncircumcised men in Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999;Nov 1;22(3):294-301. [Medline].
Wolbars AL. Circumcision and penile cancer. Lancet. 1932;1:150-3.
Schoen EJ. Ignoring evidence of circumcision benefits. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):385-7. [Medline].
Berdeu D, Sauze L, Ha-Vinh P, Blum-Boisgard C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for phimosis: a comparison of surgical and medicinal approaches and their economic effect. BJU Int. Feb 2001;87(3):239-44. [Medline].
Auvert B, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Cutler E, Nieuwoudt M, Lissouba P, Puren A, et al. Effect of male circumcision on the prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus in young men: results of a randomized controlled trial conducted in Orange Farm, South Africa. J Infect Dis. Jan 1 2009;199(1):14-9. [Medline].
Cantu S Jr. Phimosis and paraphimosis. eMedicine Journal [serial online]. 2001. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/777539-overview. [Full Text].
Doyle SM, Kahn JG, Hosang N, Carroll PR. The impact of male circumcision on HIV transmission. J Urol. Jan 2010;183(1):21-6. [Medline].
Mehta SD, Moses S, Agot K, Parker C, Ndinya-Achola JO, Maclean I, et al. Adult male circumcision does not reduce the risk of incident Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, or Trichomonas vaginalis infection: results from a randomized, controlled trial in Kenya. J Infect Dis. Aug 1 2009;200(3):370-8. [Medline].
Moses S. Male circumcision: a new approach to reducing HIV transmission. CMAJ. Oct 13 2009;181(8):E134-5. [Medline].
Prais D, Shoov-Furman R, Amir J. Is ritual circumcision a risk factor for neonatal urinary tract infections?. Arch Dis Child. Mar 2009;94(3):191-4. [Medline].
Roth DR, Gonzales ET Jr. Disorders of renal development and anomalies of the collecting system, bladder, penis, and scrotum. In: Oski FA, ed. Oski's Essential Pediatrics. 2nd ed. Wolters Kluwer; 1994:1763-5.
Tobian AA, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Kigozi G, Gravitt PE, Laeyendecker O, et al. Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV-2 and HPV infections and syphilis. N Engl J Med. Mar 26 2009;360(13):1298-309. [Medline].

