Ureteral Duplication, Ureteral Ectopia, and Ureterocele Workup
- Author: John M Gatti, MD; Chief Editor: Marc Cendron, MD more...
Laboratory Studies
- Rarely, bilateral renal dysplasia or significant renal scarring may be present, resulting in impaired renal function. In this scenario, renal function and electrolyte levels must be monitored. These patients must also be assessed for hypertension.
Imaging Studies
- Ultrasonography
- Prenatal fetal ultrasound is often the initial study suggesting the diagnosis based on hydroureteronephrosis. The natural history of prenatally diagnosed duplication anomalies is that approximately half of these infants develop urinary tract infection, and about 25% require surgical intervention in the first few years of life.[2]
- Postnatal abdominal ultrasonography is the best initial screening study.
- Renal measurements in duplicated collecting systems are often longer than those of a contralateral nonduplicated system. See the image below.
Renal duplication. Marked upper pole hydronephrosis with minimal dilation of lower pole, indicative of a duplicated collecting system. - Disparate hydronephrosis in the upper and lower pole of a kidney suggests ureteral duplication, especially with upper pole dilation associated with an obstructed or ectopic ureter or with a ureterocele.
- A ureterocele can usually be seen at the bladder level and appears as a well-defined cystic intravesical mass that can be proximally followed into a dilated ureter. If the bladder is decompressed, visualization of a ureterocele is more difficult.
- Ultrasonography provides imaging for gross evaluation of the renal parenchyma. Increased echogenicity and renal cysts are sonographic signs that suggest renal dysplasia.
- The image below illustrates bilateral single-system ureteroceles.
Bilateral ureteroceles with stones. This ultrasonogram at the bladder level depicts thin-walled, bilateral ureteroceles. Echogenic stone material can be seen in the left ureterocele.
- Intravenous urography
- Intravenous pyelography (IVP) is not commonly used. IVP generally reveals duplicated collecting systems and their level of confluence. In young girls with persistent incontinence, IVP may be helpful in defining ureteral anatomy and the level at which an ectopic ureter may be found.
- Typically, a ureterocele has been described as having a "cobra head" or " spring onion" configuration at the bladder level.
- Stones that collect in the ureterocele, as shown below, may be visible on the scout film.
Bilateral single-system ureteroceles. The collecting systems and their associated ureteroceles are opacified on intravenous pyelography (IVP). Multiple stones in the ureteroceles may be discerned within the ureteroceles (white arrows) as filling defects. - Because duplicated systems generally have poorly functioning renal moieties associated with ectopia or ureteroceles, these distinct images are usually observed with single-system intravesical ureteroceles. Delayed images are helpful in identifying poorly functioning renal units.
- Voiding cystourethrography
- Duplicated collecting systems with lower pole reflux can be visualized using voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). The configuration of the kidney lacks opacification of the nonrefluxing upper pole, giving it the appearance of a "drooping lily." See the image below.
Reflux into lower pole: A voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) that demonstrates reflux into the lower pole ureter with classic "drooping lily" configuration. - Ectopic ureters generally do not reflux unless they are ectopic to the bladder neck. In this case, the refluxing unit opacifies only during voiding, when the bladder neck is open. Occasionally, the radiologist may inadvertently pass a catheter transurethrally up the ectopic ureter. The initial films then opacify only that collecting system and not the bladder.
- Ureteroceles are best imaged at initial filling and appear as a filling defect in the bladder base (see the image below). Identifying which side large ureteroceles are associated with can be difficult. Reflux of the ipsilateral lower pole is observed in approximately 50% of cases. Contralateral reflux may be observed in 25% of cases, and reflux into the ureterocele may be observed in 10% of cases.
A large ureterocele is seen as a filling defect on the early filling images of this cystogram.
- Duplicated collecting systems with lower pole reflux can be visualized using voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). The configuration of the kidney lacks opacification of the nonrefluxing upper pole, giving it the appearance of a "drooping lily." See the image below.
- Renal scintigraphy
- Mercaptotriglycylglycine (MAG-3) renal scintigraphy is the most commonly obtained renal scan used to evaluate relative renal function and drainage. It provides information on segmental renal function, allowing comparison of the upper pole moiety to the lower. It may aid in the determination of salvageability and selection of operative technique. MAG-3 Lasix renography may also quantitate the degree of obstruction in moieties with preserved function.
- Technetium-99m (Tc99m) diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) is similar to MAG-3 but is less efficacious in patients who have kidneys with poor function and in newborns because of their relatively impaired glomerular filtration rates. Radiation exposure is fairly high with this compound.
- Tc99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is an agent that is taken up by the renal tubular cells and is used for renal scintigraphy.[3] DMSA resting can be used reliably to assess renal function but is not useful in evaluating urinary drainage of the upper urinary tract because it is secreted slowly into the urine.
- The image below illustrates pical findings of an upper pole duplicated system subtended by a ureterocele.
Left duplicated kidney with upper pole ureterocele. This renal scan shows the typical findings of an upper pole duplicated system subtended by a ureterocele. The left upper pole (black arrow) shows minimal uptake when compared with the left lower pole or right kidney.
- Axial Imaging
- Axial imaging using CT scanning or MRI is rarely the initial study of choice.
- Gadolinium-enhanced MRI may be valuable in opacifying an ectopic ureter that causes incontinence in a female, whereas other studies may not be diagnostic.
- In one study, contrast CT scanning was the most reliable study in demonstrating the poorly functioning upper pole renal moiety and the associated ectopic ureter causing continuous drip incontinence.[4]
Procedures
- The search for the orifice of an ectopic ureter may be extremely difficult. Tedious probing of any small dimple along the urethra or anterior vaginal wall with a whistle-tip catheter may be rewarded with visual confirmation of the offending moiety upon the retrograde injection of contrast. The use of indigo carmine or methylene blue injected intravenously may help in locating an ectopic ureteral orifice at the time of cystoscopy.
- Findings with large or ectopic ureteroceles, which can distort and obscure the entire field of vision, can be confusing. Finding the ureterocele orifice may be challenging.
- Small ureteroceles may not be evident, especially when the bladder is distended, which causes the ureterocele to flatten or evert. When associated with duplication, large ureteroceles may obscure visualization of any ipsilateral ureteral orifice.
- Retrograde pyelography can define the ureteral anatomy, and puncture of the ureterocele with instillation of contrast may aid in defining the origin of the lesion.
Stunell H, Barrett S, Campbell N, Colhoun E, Torreggiani WC. Prolapsed bilateral ureteroceles leading to intermittent outflow obstruction. JBR-BTR. Nov-Dec 2010;93(6):312-3. [Medline].
Adiego B, Martinez-Ten P, Perez-Pedregosa J, Illescas T, Barron E, Wong AE, et al. Antenatally diagnosed renal duplex anomalies: sonographic features and long-term postnatal outcome. J Ultrasound Med. Jun 2011;30(6):809-15. [Medline].
Gill B. Ureteric ectopy in children. Br J Urol. 1980;52:257-63. [Medline].
Hanson GR, Gatti JM, Gittes KG. Diagnosis of ectopic ureter as a cause of urinary incontinence. J Ped Urol. February 2007;3(1):53-7.
Merguerian PA, Taenzer A, Knoerlein K, McQuiston L, Herz D. Variation in management of duplex system intravesical ureteroceles: a survey of pediatric urologists. J Urol. Oct 2010;184(4 Suppl):1625-30. [Medline].
Blyth B, Passerini-Glazel G, Camuffo C, et al. Endoscopic incision of ureteroceles: intravesical versus ectopic. J Urol. Mar 1993;149(3):556-9; discussion 560. [Medline].
Adorisio O, Elia A, Landi L, Taverna M, Malvasio V, Danti AD. Effectiveness of primary endoscopic incision in treatment of ectopic ureterocele associated with duplex system. Urology. Jan 2011;77(1):191-4. [Medline].
Di Renzo D, Ellsworth PI, Caldamone AA, Chiesa PL. Transurethral puncture for ureterocele-which factors dictate outcomes?. J Urol. Oct 2010;184(4 Suppl):1620-4. [Medline].
Byun E, Merguerian PA. A meta-analysis of surgical practice patterns in the endoscopic management of ureteroceles. J Urol. Oct 2006;176(4 Pt 2):1871-7; discussion 1877. [Medline].
Bayne AP, Roth DR. Dextranomer/hyaluronic injection for the management of vesicoureteric reflux in complete ureteral duplication: should age and gender be factors in decision making?. J Endourol. Jun 2010;24(6):1013-6. [Medline].
Lowe GJ, Canon SJ, Jayanthi VR. Laparoscopic reconstructive options for obstruction in children with duplex renal anomalies. BJU Int. Jan 2008;101(2):227-30. [Medline].
Nerli RB, Vernekar R, Guntaka AK, Patil SM, Jali SM, Hiremath MB. Laparoscopic hemi/partial nephrectomy in children with ureteral duplication anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int. Jul 2011;27(7):769-74. [Medline].
Storm DW, Modi A, Jayanthi VR. Laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy in the management of ureteral ectopia in infants and children. J Pediatr Urol. Sep 23 2010;[Medline].
Sakellaris G, Kumara S, Cervellione RM, Dickson AP, Gough D, Hennayake S. Outcome study of upper pole heminephroureterectomy in children. Int Urol Nephrol. Jun 2011;43(2):279-82. [Medline].
Pohl HG. Recent advances in the management of ureteroceles in infants and children: why less may be more. Curr Opin Urol. Jul 2011;21(4):322-7. [Medline].
Caldamone AA, Snyder HM 3d, Duckett JW. Ureteroceles in children: followup of management with upper tract approach. J Urol. Jun 1984;131(6):1130-2. [Medline].
Coplen DE, Duckett JW. The modern approach to ureteroceles. J Urol. Jan 1995;153(1):166-71. [Medline].
Diard F, Eklof O, Lebowitz R, Maurseth K. Urethral obstruction in boys caused by prolapse of simple ureterocele. Pediatr Radiol. 1981;11(3):139-42. [Medline].
Gran CD, Kropp BP, Cheng EY, Kropp KA. Primary lower urinary tract reconstruction for nonfunctioning renal moieties associated with obstructing ureteroceles. J Urol. 2005;173:198-201. [Medline].
Husmann D, Strand B, Ewalt D, et al. Management of ectopic ureterocele associated with renal duplication: a comparison of partial nephrectomy and endoscopic decompression. J Urol. 1999;162:1406-9. [Medline].
Husmann DA, Ewalt DH, Glenski WJ, Bernier PA. Ureterocele associated with ureteral duplication and a nonfunctioning upper pole segment: management by partial nephroureterectomy alone. J Urol. Aug 1995;154(2 Pt 2):723-6. [Medline].
Johnson DK, Perlmutter AD. Single system ectopic ureteroceles with anomalies of the heart, testis and vas deferens. J Urol. Jan 1980;123(1):81-3. [Medline].
Klauber GT, Crawford DB. Prolapse of ectopic ureterocele and bladder trigone. Urology. Feb 1980;15(2):164-6. [Medline].
Malek RS, Kelalis PP, Burke EC, Stickler GB. Simple and ectopic ureterocele in infancy and childhood. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Apr 1972;134(4):611-6. [Medline].
Mandell J, Colodny AH, Lebowitz R, et al. Ureteroceles in infants and children. J Urol. Jun 1980;123(6):921-6. [Medline].
Siomou E, Papadopoulou F, Kollios KD, et al. Duplex collecting system diagnosed during the first 6 years of life after a first urinary tract infection: a study of 63 children. J Urol. 2006;175:678-81; discussion 681-2. [Medline].
Smith C, Gosalbez R, Parrott TS, et al. Transurethral puncture of ectopic ureteroceles in neonates and infants. J Urol. Dec 1994;152(6 Pt 1):2110-2. [Medline].


