Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.


Irritant Contact Dermatitis

  • Author: Daniel J Hogan, MD; Chief Editor: William D James, MD  more...
Updated: Apr 16, 2014


Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is inflammation of the skin typically manifested by erythema, mild edema, and scaling. Irritant contact dermatitis is a nonspecific response of the skin to direct chemical damage that releases mediators of inflammation predominantly from epidermal cells. A corrosive agent causes the immediate death of epidermal cells, manifested by chemical burns and cutaneous ulcers. Note the image below.

Chronic irritant contact dermatitis of the hands i Chronic irritant contact dermatitis of the hands in an older worker; the condition resulted in early retirement.

The hands are the most important sites of irritant contact dermatitis. Irritant contact dermatitis from repeated workplace exposure of the hands to soaps, cleansers, and solvents is the source of most occupational skin disorders.

Irritant contact dermatitis remains understudied compared with allergic contact dermatitis. Most articles on contact dermatitis concern allergic contact dermatitis. This largely reflects the fact that with history and patch testing, a specific hypersensitivity and a probable cause of dermatitis can be identified in most cases of allergic contact dermatitis.

No diagnostic test exists for irritant contact dermatitis. The diagnosis rests on the exclusion of other cutaneous diseases (especially allergic contact dermatitis) and on the clinical appearance of dermatitis at a site sufficiently exposed to a known cutaneous irritant. Laboratory studies may be of value in eliminating some disorders from the differential diagnosis. (See Workup).

The definitive treatment of irritant contact dermatitis is the identification and removal of any potential causal agents. Advise individuals to use ceramide creams or bland emollients after washing hands with soap and before sleep. (See Treatment.)

Although the term hypoallergenic is used widely in the marketing of consumer products, no Food and Drug Administration–approved definition of "hypoallergenic" exists. Individuals with susceptible skin (eg, atopic dermatitis, facial skin of individuals with rosacea) would benefit greatly from hypoirritating cleansers, cosmetics, moisturizers, and protectants, but there is no standard method for identifying such products.

Go to Allergic Contact Dermatitis, Pediatric Contact Dermatitis, and Protein Contact Dermatitis for complete information on these topics.



Irritant contact dermatitis is the clinical result of sufficient inflammation arising from the release of proinflammatory cytokines from skin cells (principally keratinocytes), usually in response to chemical stimuli. Different clinical forms may arise. The 3 main pathophysiological changes are skin barrier disruption, epidermal cellular changes, and cytokine release.

With sufficient concentration or duration of exposures, a wide range of chemicals can act as cutaneous irritants. Common cutaneous irritants include solvents, microtrauma, and mechanical irritants.

Cumulative irritant contact dermatitis from repeated mild skin irritation from soap and water is common. For example, hand-washing frequency of more than 35 times per shift was associated strongly with occupational hand dermatitis in intensive care unit workers (odds ratio = 4.13). Similarly, most cases of "homemaker's" eczema are irritant contact dermatitis resulting from repeated skin exposure to low-grade cutaneous irritants, particularly soaps, water, and detergents.

Solvents cause cutaneous irritation because they remove essential fats and oils from the skin, which increases transepidermal water loss and renders the skin susceptible to the increased direct toxic effects of other previously well-tolerated cutaneous exposures. The alcohol propanol is less irritating to the skin than the detergent sodium lauryl sulfate.

p Ka, an acid dissociation constant, is a quantitative measure of the strength of an acid in solution. p Ka has been shown to be highly predictive of acute skin irritation for acids and bases: acids with a p Ka of less than 4 and bases with a p Ka of less than 8 are highly irritative.[1]

Microtrauma may produce skin irritation. A common example is fiberglass, which may produce pruritus with minimal visible inflammation in susceptible individuals. Many plant leaves and stems bear small spicules and barbs that produce direct skin trauma.

Physical irritants (eg, friction, abrasive grains, occlusion) and detergents such as sodium lauryl sulfate produce more irritant contact dermatitis in combination than singly.[2] Propanol and sodium lauryl sulfate are not additive irritants, however.

Skin irritation predisposes the skin to develop sensitization to topical agents. Skin irritation by both nonallergenic and allergenic compounds induces Langerhans cell migration and maturation.[3] An exacerbation of irritant contact dermatitis may reflect development of allergic contact dermatitis to topical creams, medications, or rubber gloves.

The pathogenesis of irritant contact dermatitis involves resident epidermal cells, dermal fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and various leukocytes interacting with each other under the control of a network of cytokines and lipid mediators. Keratinocytes play an important role in the initiation and perpetuation of skin inflammatory reactions through the release of and responses to cytokines. Resting keratinocytes produce some cytokines constitutively.

A variety of environmental stimuli (eg, ultraviolet light, chemical agents) can induce epidermal keratinocytes to release the following cytokines:

  • Inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha)
  • Chemotactic cytokines (interleukin 8, interleukin 10)
  • Growth-promoting cytokines (interleukin 6, interleukin 7, interleukin 15, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, transforming growth factor–alpha)
  • Cytokines regulating humoral versus cellular immunity (interleukin 10, interleukin 12, interleukin 18)

Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 promotes the infiltration of leukocytes into the epidermis in cutaneous inflammatory reactions, including irritant contact dermatitis.

Significantly increased numbers of dividing keratinocytes are present 48 and 96 hours after exposure to the anionic emulsifying agent sodium lauryl sulfate (used in shampoos, skin cleansers, acne treatments, and toothpastes and in laboratories as an experimental irritant). However, Heinemann et al found that repeated occlusive application of 0.5% sodium lauryl sulfate over 3 weeks often resulted in adaptation (the so-called hardening phenomenon), with an increase in ceramide 1 in the lipid composition of the stratum corneum.[4]

All irritants provoke a similar pattern of cellular infiltration in the dermis; the densities of most of the cell types rise in proportion to the intensity of inflammation. Within the epidermis, marked differences exist in the patterns of cellular infiltration among different irritants.

Individuals with a history of atopic dermatitis are prone to develop irritant contact dermatitis of the hands. Polymorphisms in the filaggrin (FLG) gene, which result in loss of filaggrin production, may alter the skin barrier and are a predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. FLG null alleles are associated with increased susceptibility to chronic irritant contact dermatitis.[5]



Almost any material may be a cutaneous irritant, if the exposure is sufficiently prolonged and/or the concentration of the substance sufficiently high. Environmental factors may enhance the effect of other irritants.

Dry air and temperature variation

Dry air renders the skin more susceptible to cutaneous irritants. Sufficiently dry air alone may provoke irritant contact dermatitis. Most cases of winter itch are a result of dry skin from the drier air found during sustained periods of cold weather.

An increase in temperature (up to 43°C from 20°C) increases the cutaneous effect of an irritant.[6]


Continual exposure to water may produce maceration or repeated evaporation of water from the skin may produce cutaneous irritation by desiccation of the skin. Even distilled water experimentally provokes increased CD11c+ cells and neutrophils in the epidermis.


Many individuals are exposed to solvents, particularly at work. Solvents such as alcohol or xylene remove lipids from the skin, producing direct irritant contact dermatitis and rendering the skin more susceptible to other cutaneous irritants, such as soap and water.

Irritant contact dermatitis from alcohol most often is cumulative. Manual workers may wash their hands inappropriately with solvents to remove oil, grease, paints, or other materials; thus, they develop irritant contact dermatitis.

Inappropriate skin cleansing is a primary cause of irritant contact dermatitis in the workplace. Washing facilities and methods must be inspected when investigating the workplace for 1 or more cases of occupational irritant contact dermatitis. The irritating agents include aromatic, aliphatic, and chlorinated solvents, as well as solvents such as turpentine, alcohol, esters, and ketones. Some organic solvents produce an immediate erythematous reaction on the skin and remove lipids from the stratum corneum.

Metalworking fluids

Neat oils most commonly produce folliculitis and acne. They may cause irritant contact dermatitis (as well as allergic dermatitis). Water-based metalworking fluids often cause irritant contact dermatitis in exposed workers; surfactants in these fluids are the main culprit.

Cumulative irritant contact dermatitis

This is common in many occupations that often are termed "wet work." Healthcare workers wash their hands 20-40 times a day, producing cumulative irritant contact dermatitis. Similar exposures occur among individuals who wash hair repeatedly or in cleaners or kitchen workers.

Multiple skin irritants may be additive or synergistic in their effects. Alcohol-based hand-cleansing gels cause less skin irritation than hand washing and therefore are preferred for hand hygiene from the dermatological point of view. An alcohol-based hand-cleansing gel may even decrease, rather than increase, skin irritation after a hand wash, owing to a mechanical partial elimination of the detergent.[7]


Fiberglass produces direct damage to the skin, usually manifested by pruritus that may result in excoriation and secondary skin damage. Cutaneous irritation primarily is caused by fiberglass with diameters exceeding 4.5 µm.

Controversy surrounds whether individuals with dermatographism are more susceptible to fiberglass dermatitis.

Most workers with irritant contact dermatitis resulting from fiberglass develop hardening, in which they tolerate further cutaneous exposure to fiberglass.

Many plant leaves and stems bear small spicules and barbs that produce direct skin trauma

Mechanical trauma

Pressure produces callus formation. Pounding produces petechia or ecchymosis. Sudden trauma or friction produces blistering in the epidermis. Repeated rubbing or scratching produces lichenification. Sweating and friction appear to be the main cause of dermatitis that appears under soccer shin guards in children.[8]

Rubber gloves

Some rubber gloves may provoke direct cutaneous irritation. Many workers complain of irritation from the powder in rubber gloves.

Remember that gloves compromised by a hole may allow an irritant to enter; occlusion dramatically increases skin damage from the irritant. Occlusion accentuates the effects, good or bad, of topical agents. Kerosene may produce skin changes similar to that of toxic epidermal necrolysis following occluded cutaneous exposure. Excessive amounts of ethylene oxide in surgical sheets also may produce similar changes.

Sodium lauryl sulfate

This chemical is found in some topical medications, particularly acne medications, as well as a range of soaps and shampoos. It is also a classic experimental cutaneous irritant.

Hydrofluoric acid

A hydrofluoric acid burn is a medical emergency. Remember that onset of clinical manifestations may be delayed after the acute exposure (this is crucial to diagnosis). Unfortunately, hydrofluoric acid burns are most frequent on the digits, where the pain is most severe and management is most difficult (see Hydrofluoric Acid Burns).


Skin surfaces normally have an acidic pH, and alkalies (eg, many soaps) produce more irritation than many acids. The "acid mantle" of the stratum corneum seems to be important for both permeability barrier formation and cutaneous antimicrobial defense. Use of skin cleansing agents, especially synthetic detergents with a pH of approximately 5.5 rather than alkaline pH, may help prevent skin disease.[9]



United States statistics

Irritant contact dermatitis is common in occupations that involve repeated hand washing or repeated exposure of the skin to water, food materials, and other irritants. High-risk occupations include cleaning, hospital care, food preparation, and hairdressing.

The prevalence of occupational hand dermatitis was found to be 55.6% in 2 intensive care units and was 69.7% in the most highly exposed workers. Hand-washing frequency of more than 35 times per shift was associated strongly with occupational hand dermatitis.[10]

International statistics

In Denmark, cleaners comprise the greatest number of affected workers, but culinary workers have the highest incidence. A higher proportion of prolonged sick leave is seen among those in food-related occupations compared with those in wet occupations.[11]

The incidence rates of contact dermatitis in Germany were 4.5 per 10,000 workers for irritant contact dermatitis, compared with 4.1 per 10,000 workers for allergic contact dermatitis. The highest irritant contact dermatitis annual incidence rates were found in hairdressers (46.9 cases per 10,000 workers per year), bakers (23.5 cases per 10,000 workers per year), and pastry cooks (16.9 cases per 10,000 workers per year.[12]

Sexual differences in incidence

Irritant contact dermatitis is significantly more common in women than in men. The high frequency of hand eczema in women in comparison with men is caused by environmental factors, not genetic factors.

Occupational irritant contact dermatitis affects women almost twice as often as men, in contrast to other occupational diseases that predominantly affect men. Women are exposed more highly to cutaneous irritants from their disproportionately greater role in housecleaning and the care of small children at home. In addition, women predominantly perform many occupations at high risk for irritant contact dermatitis (eg, hairdressing, nursing).

Age-related differences in incidence

Irritant contact dermatitis may occur at any age. Many cases of diaper dermatitis are irritant contact dermatitis resulting from direct skin irritants present in urine and, especially, feces. Older persons have drier and thinner skin that does not tolerate soaps and solvents as well as younger individuals. Occupational hand eczema often is associated with persistent dermatitis and prolonged sick leave, with substantially greater severity among those with occupational irritant contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis and age older than 50 years.



Prognosis is good for nonatopic individuals in whom irritant contact dermatitis is diagnosed and managed promptly. Individuals with atopic dermatitis remain highly susceptible to irritant contact dermatitis and may find that the tasks of many common occupations (eg, nursing, hairdressing) produce too much direct skin inflammation to continue with these careers.

Hardening may be specific to the irritant inducing the hardening phenomenon and does not occur in all persons exposed long term to an irritant.[1] Hardened skin may also have a thickened stratum granulosum, with changes in the expression of various inflammatory mediators and markers.[1] An induction of an increase in the stratum corneum lipid ceramide 1 may play a key role as a protection mechanism against irritation by repeated application of sodium lauryl sulfate.[2, 4]

Activities of daily living and work may be reduced by severe irritant contact dermatitis.

Acute irritant contact dermatitis reactions to potent irritants (eg, acids, alkaline solutions) are comparable to a chemical burn and can be graded like thermal burns (ie, first-, second-, or third-degree burns). With appropriate symptomatic management, the prognosis for this type of irritant contact dermatitis is usually good, and, unless the dermis is damaged, no permanent scarring should occur. See Chemical Burns for more information.


Hydrofluoric acid is a potent cutaneous irritant used in low-technology and high-technology industries and at home in rust removal.[13] Death from hypocalcemia may ensue if as little as 1% of the skin's surface area is exposed sufficiently to this strong inorganic acid and if complications are not managed optimally (see Hydrofluoric Acid Burns).


Patient Education

Remind individuals that they must continue to avoid cutaneous irritants; they will redevelop or aggravate dermatitis if they continue to have the same skin care exposures that resulted in irritant contact dermatitis. The possibility of secondary or complicating allergic contact dermatitis always must be borne in mind.

For patient education information, see the Skin, Hair, and Nails Center, as well as Contact Dermatitis.

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Daniel J Hogan, MD Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine (Dermatology), Nova Southeastern University College of Osteopathic Medicine; Investigator, Hill Top Research, Florida Research Center

Daniel J Hogan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Contact Dermatitis Society, Canadian Dermatology Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Michael J Wells, MD, FAAD Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine

Michael J Wells, MD, FAAD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Paul Krusinski, MD Director of Dermatology, Fletcher Allen Health Care; Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine

Paul Krusinski, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Physicians, Society for Investigative Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

William D James, MD Paul R Gross Professor of Dermatology, Vice-Chairman, Residency Program Director, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

William D James, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, Society for Investigative Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

  1. Watkins SA, Maibach HI. The hardening phenomenon in irritant contact dermatitis: an interpretative update. Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Mar. 60(3):123-30. [Medline].

  2. Fluhr JW, Akengin A, Bornkessel A, Fuchs S, Praessler J, Norgauer J, et al. Additive impairment of the barrier function by mechanical irritation, occlusion and sodium lauryl sulphate in vivo. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Jul. 153(1):125-31. [Medline].

  3. Jacobs JJ, Lehé CL, Hasegawa H, Elliott GR, Das PK. Skin irritants and contact sensitizers induce Langerhans cell migration and maturation at irritant concentration. Exp Dermatol. 2006 Jun. 15(6):432-40. [Medline].

  4. Heinemann C, Paschold C, Fluhr J, Wigger-Alberti W, Schliemann-Willers S, Farwanah H, et al. Induction of a hardening phenomenon by repeated application of SLS: analysis of lipid changes in the stratum corneum. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005. 85(4):290-5. [Medline].

  5. de Jongh CM, Khrenova L, Verberk MM, Calkoen F, van Dijk FJ, Voss H, et al. Loss-of-function polymorphisms in the filaggrin gene are associated with an increased susceptibility to chronic irritant contact dermatitis: a case-control study. Br J Dermatol. 2008 Sep. 159(3):621-7. [Medline].

  6. Kartono F, Maibach HI. Irritants in combination with a synergistic or additive effect on the skin response: an overview of tandem irritation studies. Contact Dermatitis. 2006 Jun. 54(6):303-12. [Medline].

  7. Löffler H, Kampf G, Schmermund D, Maibach HI. How irritant is alcohol?. Br J Dermatol. 2007 Jul. 157(1):74-81. [Medline].

  8. Weston WL, Morelli JG. Dermatitis under soccer shin guards: allergy or contact irritant reaction?. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006 Jan-Feb. 23(1):19-20. [Medline].

  9. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Korting HC. The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2006. 19(6):296-302. [Medline].

  10. Forrester BG, Roth VS. Hand dermatitis in intensive care units. J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Oct. 40(10):881-5. [Medline].

  11. Cvetkovski RS, Rothman KJ, Olsen J, Mathiesen B, Iversen L, Johansen JD, et al. Relation between diagnoses on severity, sick leave and loss of job among patients with occupational hand eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Jan. 152(1):93-8. [Medline].

  12. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, Kretz J, Diepgen TL. Importance of irritant contact dermatitis in occupational skin disease. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002. 3(4):283-9. [Medline].

  13. Mangion SM, Beulke SH, Braitberg G. Hydrofluoric acid burn from a household rust remover. Med J Aust. 2001 Sep 3. 175(5):270-1. [Medline].

  14. Basketter DA, Marriott M, Gilmour NJ, White IR. Strong irritants masquerading as skin allergens: the case of benzalkonium chloride. Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Apr. 50(4):213-7. [Medline].

  15. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF Jr. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1995.

  16. Bernstein IL, Li JT, Bernstein DI, et al. Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. Part 1. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Mar 2008. [Full Text].

  17. Bernstein IL, Li JT, Bernstein DI, et al. Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. Part 2. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Mar 2008. [Full Text].

  18. Lakshmi C, Srinivas CR, Anand CV, Mathew AC. Irritancy ranking of 31 cleansers in the Indian market in a 24-h patch test. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2008 Aug. 30(4):277-83. [Medline].

  19. Menne T, Johansen JD, Sommerlund M, Veien NK. Hand eczema guidelines based on the Danish guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Jul. 65(1):3-12. [Medline].

  20. Levin C, Zhai H, Bashir S, Chew AL, Anigbogu A, Stern R, et al. Efficacy of corticosteroids in acute experimental irritant contact dermatitis?. Skin Res Technol. 2001 Nov. 7(4):214-8. [Medline].

  21. Fuchs M, Schliemann-Willers S, Heinemann C, Elsner P. Tacrolimus enhances irritation in a 5-day human irritancy in vivo model. Contact Dermatitis. 2002 May. 46(5):290-4. [Medline].

  22. Draelos ZD. New treatments for restoring impaired epidermal barrier permeability: skin barrier repair creams. Clin Dermatol. 2012 May-Jun. 30(3):345-8. [Medline].

  23. Elias PM. Structure and function of the stratum corneum extracellular matrix. J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Sep. 132(9):2131-3. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  24. Miller DW, Koch SB, Yentzer BA, Clark AR, O'Neill JR, Fountain J, et al. An over-the-counter moisturizer is as clinically effective as, and more cost-effective than, prescription barrier creams in the treatment of children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: a randomized, controlled trial. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011 May. 10(5):531-7. [Medline].

  25. Slotosch CM, Kampf G, Löffler H. Effects of disinfectants and detergents on skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Oct. 57(4):235-41. [Medline].

Chronic irritant contact dermatitis of the hands in an older worker; the condition resulted in early retirement.
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.