eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Allergy & Immunology

Contact Dermatitis, Irritant

Daniel J Hogan, MD, Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine (Dermatology), NOVA Southeastern University; Investigator, Hill Top Research, Florida Research Center

Updated: Oct 16, 2009

Introduction

Background

Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is inflammation of the skin typically manifested by erythema, mild edema, and scaling. Irritant contact dermatitis is a nonspecific response of the skin to direct chemical damage that releases mediators of inflammation predominately from epidermal cells. A corrosive agent causes the immediate death of epidermal cells as manifested by chemical burns and cutaneous ulcers.

Irritant contact dermatitis remains understudied compared to allergic contact dermatitis. Most articles on contact dermatitis concern allergic contact dermatitis. This largely reflects the fact that with patch testing, a specific hypersensitivity and a probable cause of dermatitis can be identified in most cases of allergic contact dermatitis. No diagnostic test exists for irritant contact dermatitis. The diagnosis rests on the exclusion of other cutaneous diseases (especially allergic contact dermatitis) and on the clinical appearance of dermatitis at a site sufficiently exposed to a known cutaneous irritant.

In the consumer world, the term hypoallergenic is used widely, although no Food and Drug Administration–approved definition of hypoallergenic exists. A necessity exists for hypoirritating cleansers, cosmetics, moisturizers, and protectants; however, no standard method exists to identify products that are of great use to individuals with susceptible skin (eg, atopic dermatitis, facial skin of individuals with rosacea).

The hands are the most important sites of irritant contact dermatitis. Most occupational skin disorders are irritant contact dermatitis resulting from repeated workplace exposure of the hands to soaps, cleansers, and solvents.

Pathophysiology

Irritant contact dermatitis is the clinical result of sufficient inflammation arising from the release of proinflammatory cytokines from skin cells (principally keratinocytes), usually in response to chemical stimuli. Different clinical forms may arise. The 3 main pathophysiological changes are skin barrier disruption, epidermal cellular changes, and cytokine release.

A wide range of chemicals with sufficient concentration or duration of exposures are capable of acting as cutaneous irritants. Common cutaneous irritants include detergent and water. Most cases of homemaker's eczema are irritant contact dermatitis resulting from repeated skin exposure to low-grade cutaneous irritants, particularly soaps, water, and detergents.

Cumulative irritant contact dermatitis from repeated mild skin irritation from soap and water is common. For example, hand-washing frequency of more than 35 times per shift was associated strongly with occupational hand dermatitis in intensive care unit workers (odds ratio = 4.13).
Solvents are another cause of cutaneous irritation because they remove essential fats and oils from the skin, which increases transepidermal water loss and renders the skin susceptible to the increased direct toxic effects of other previously well-tolerated cutaneous exposures. The alcohol propanol is less irritating to the skin than the detergent sodium lauryl sulfate.

p K _a, an acid dissociation constant, is a quantitative measure of the strength of an acid in solution. p K _a has been shown to be highly predictive of acute skin irritation for acids and bases; acids with a p K ^a of less than 4 and bases with a p K _a of less than 8 are highly irritative.
¹

Microtrauma also may produce skin irritation. A common example is fiberglass, which may produce pruritus with minimal visible inflammation in susceptible individuals. Many plant leaves and stems bear small spicules and barbs that produce direct skin trauma.

Physical irritants (eg, friction, abrasive grains, occlusion) and detergents such as sodium lauryl sulfate in combination produce more irritant contact dermatitis in combination than singly though propanol and sodium lauryl sulfate, are not additive irritants.

Skin irritation predisposes the skin to develop sensitization to topical agents. Skin irritation by both nonallergenic and allergenic compounds induces Langerhans cell migration and maturation.² An exacerbation of irritant contact dermatitis may reflect development of allergic contact dermatitis to topical creams, medications, or rubber gloves.

The pathogenesis of irritant contact dermatitis involves resident epidermal cells, dermal fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and various leukocytes interacting with each other under the control of a network of cytokines and lipid mediators. Keratinocytes play an important role in the initiation and perpetuation of skin inflammatory reactions through the release of and responses to cytokines. Resting keratinocytes produce some cytokines constitutively.

A variety of environmental stimuli (eg, ultraviolet light, chemical agents) can induce epidermal keratinocytes to release inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha), chemotactic cytokines (interleukin 8, interleukin 10), growth promoting cytokines (interleukin 6, interleukin 7, interleukin 15, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, transforming growth factor a), and cytokines regulating humoral versus cellular immunity (interleukin 10, interleukin 12, interleukin 18). Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 promotes the infiltration of leukocytes into the epidermis in cutaneous inflammatory reactions, including irritant contact dermatitis.

Significantly increased numbers of dividing keratinocytes are present 48 and 96 hours after exposure to the anionic emulsifying agent sodium lauryl sulfate (used in medicated shampoos, skin cleansers, acne treatments, and toothpastes and as an experimental irritant). At sites of previous irritant contact dermatitis chronic skin reactivity to sodium lauryl sulfate, hyperreactivity developed even after the 10th week postinduction compared with normal sites.^3,4

All irritants provoke a similar pattern of cellular infiltration in the dermis; the densities of most of the cell types rise in proportion to the intensity of inflammation. Within the epidermis, marked differences exist in the patterns of cellular infiltration among different irritants.

Individuals with a past history of atopic dermatitis are prone to develop irritant contact dermatitis of the hands. Polymorphisms in the filaggrin (FLG) gene, which result in loss of filaggrin production, may alter the skin barrier and are a predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. FLG null alleles are associated with increased susceptibility to chronic irritant contact dermatitis.⁵

Frequency

United States

Irritant contact dermatitis is common in occupations that involve repeated hand washing or repeated exposure of the skin to water, food materials, and other irritants. High-risk occupations include cleaning, hospital care, food preparation, and hairdressing. The prevalence of occupational hand dermatitis was found to be 55.6% in 2 intensive care units and was 69.7% in the most highly exposed workers (those reporting a frequency of hand washing >35 times per shift). Hand-washing frequency of more than 35 times per shift was associated strongly with occupational hand dermatitis.⁶

International

In Denmark, cleaners comprise the greatest number of affected workers, but culinary workers have the highest incidence. A higher proportion of prolonged sick leave is seen among those in food-related occupations compared with those in wet occupations.⁷ The incidence rates of irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis in Germany were 4.5 patients per 10,000 workers for irritant contact dermatitis, compared with 4.1 patients per 10,000 workers for allergic contact dermatitis. The highest irritant contact dermatitis annual incidence rates were found in hairdressers (46.9 cases per 10,000 workers per year), bakers (23.5 cases per 10,000 workers per year), and pastry cooks (16.9 cases per 10,000 workers per year.⁸

Mortality/Morbidity

Hydrofluoric acid is a potent cutaneous irritant used in low-technology and high-technology industries and at home in rust removal.⁹ Exposure to this strong inorganic acid may produce death from hypocalcemia if as little as 1% of the skin's surface area is exposed sufficiently to this toxic agent and if complications are not managed optimally (see Hydrofluoric Acid Burns).

Sex

Irritant contact dermatitis is significantly more common in women than in men. The high frequency of hand eczema in women in comparison with men is caused by environmental factors, not genetic factors. Occupational irritant contact dermatitis affects women almost twice as often as men in contrast to other occupational diseases that predominantly affect men. Women are exposed more highly to cutaneous irritants from their disproportionately greater role in housecleaning and the care of small children at home. In addition, women predominantly perform many occupations at high risk for irritant contact dermatitis (eg, hairdressing, nursing).

Age

Irritant contact dermatitis may occur at any age. Many cases of diaper dermatitis are irritant contact dermatitis resulting from direct skin irritants present in urine and, especially, feces. Older persons have drier and thinner skin that does not tolerate soaps and solvents as well as younger individuals. Occupational hand eczema often is associated with persistent dermatitis and prolonged sick leave with substantially greater severity among those with occupational irritant contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis and age older than 50 years.

Clinical

History

A detailed history is required because the diagnosis of irritant contact dermatitis rests on the history of exposure of the affected body site to the cutaneous irritant. Patch testing also is used in severe or persistent cases to exclude allergic contact dermatitis as a component of the individual's cutaneous manifestations.

• Primary subjective symptoms of irritant contact dermatitis include the following:
  • History of sufficient exposure to a cutaneous irritant is noted.
  • Onset of symptoms occurs within minutes to hours of exposure in simple acute irritant contact dermatitis. Acute delayed irritant contact dermatitis is characteristic of certain irritants, such as benzalkonium chloride (eg, zephiran, a preservative and disinfectant), which elicits a retarded (8-24 h after exposure) inflammatory reaction.¹⁰
  • The onset of signs and symptoms may be delayed by weeks in cumulative irritant contact dermatitis. Cumulative irritant contact dermatitis is a consequence of multiple incidents of subthreshold damage to the skin, with the time between exposures being too short for a resolution of skin barrier function. Patients with sensitive skin (ie, atopic individuals) have a decreased irritant threshold or a prolonged restoration time, making them more vulnerable to clinical irritant contact dermatitis. Cumulative irritant contact dermatitis is not dependent on exposure to a potent irritant, but exposure to weak irritants, which prompt the reaction. Often, the exposure (ie, water) is not only at work but also at home. These patients report both itching and pain caused by fissuring of the hyperkeratotic skin (chapping).
  • Pain, burning, stinging, or discomfort exceeding pruritus early in the clinical course occur.
• Less important subjective criteria for irritant contact dermatitis include the following:
  • Onset of dermatitis within 2 weeks of exposure
  • Reports of many other coworkers or family members affected
• Occupational irritant contact dermatitis typically affects workers who are new to a job, who are constitutionally more susceptible to irritant contact dermatitis, or who have not learned to protect their skin from cutaneous irritants.
• Verified history of many other coworkers affected by similar contact dermatitis indicates irritant contact dermatitis because most allergens do not sensitize more than a few percent of exposed individuals. Exceptions are potent contact sensitizers, such as the contact allergen in poison ivy, or experimental sensitizers such as diphencyprone or dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB).
• Individuals with history of atopic dermatitis (especially of the hands) are more susceptible to irritant contact dermatitis, particularly of the hands.
• Other causes of contact dermatitis (particularly allergic contact dermatitis) must be excluded by history and/or patch testing to the relevant allergens.

Physical

Chronic irritant contact dermatitis of the hands in an older worker; the condition resulted in early retirement.

• Rietschel and Fowler proposed the primary diagnostic criteria for irritant contact dermatitis as follows¹¹ :
  • Macular erythema, hyperkeratosis, or fissuring predominating over vesiculation
  • Glazed, parched, or scalded appearance of the epidermis
  • Healing process beginning promptly on withdrawal of exposure to the offending agent
  • Patch testing negative and includes all possible allergens
• Minor objective criteria for irritant contact dermatitis include the following: 
  • Sharp circumscription of the dermatitis
  • Evidence of gravitational influence such as a dripping effect
  • Lower tendency for the dermatitis to spread than in cases of allergic contact dermatitis
  • Morphologic changes suggesting small differences in concentration or contact time producing large differences in skin damage
• Individuals may develop a habit of continuing to rub a site initially affected by irritant contact dermatitis and may develop secondary neurodermatitis or lichen simplex chronicus (lichenification), which may be accepted as a sequela of an occupational injury.

Causes

Almost any material may be a cutaneous irritant with sufficient exposure in time and/or concentration.

• Dry air: Dry air renders the skin more susceptible to cutaneous irritants. Sufficiently dry air alone may provoke irritant contact dermatitis. Most cases of winter itch are a result of dry skin from the drier air found during sustained periods of cold weather.
• Temperature variation: An increase in temperature (up to 43ºC from 20ºC) increases the cutaneous effect of an irritant.¹²
• Water: Continual exposure to water may produce maceration or repeated evaporation of water from the skin may produce cutaneous irritation by desiccation of the skin. Even distilled water experimentally provokes increased CD11c⁺ cells and neutrophils in the epidermis.
• Solvents: Many individuals are exposed to solvents, particularly at work. Solvents such as alcohol or xylene remove lipids from the skin, producing direct irritant contact dermatitis and rendering the skin more susceptible to other cutaneous irritants, such as soap and water.
• Alcohol: Irritant contact dermatitis from alcohol most often is cumulative. Manual workers may wash their hands inappropriately with solvents to remove oil, grease, paints, or other materials; thus, they develop irritant contact dermatitis. Inappropriate skin cleansing is a primary cause of irritant contact dermatitis in the workplace. Washing facilities and methods must be inspected when investigating the workplace for 1 or more cases of occupational irritant contact dermatitis. The irritating agents include aromatic, aliphatic, and chlorinated solvents, as well as solvents such as turpentine, alcohol, esters, and ketones. Some organic solvents produce an immediate erythematous reaction on the skin and remove lipids from the stratum corneum.
• Metalworking fluids: Neat oils most commonly produce folliculitis and acne. They may cause irritant contact dermatitis (as well as allergic dermatitis). Water-based metalworking fluids often cause irritant contact dermatitis in exposed workers; surfactants in these fluids are the main culprit.
• Cumulative irritant contact dermatitis: This is common in many occupations that often are termed wet work. Health care workers wash their hands 20-40 times a day, producing cumulative irritant contact dermatitis. Similar exposures occur among individuals who wash hair repeatedly or in cleaners or kitchen workers. Multiple skin irritants may be additive or synergistic in their effects. Alcohol-based hand-cleansing gels cause less skin irritation than hand washing and therefore are preferred for hand hygiene from the dermatological point of view. An alcohol-based hand-cleansing gel may even decrease, rather than increase, skin irritation after a hand wash, owing to a mechanical partial elimination of the detergent.¹³
• Microtrauma: Many plant leaves and stems bear small spicules and barbs that produce direct skin trauma.
• Fiberglass: Fiberglass produces direct damage to the skin, usually manifested by pruritus that may result in excoriation and secondary skin damage. Cutaneous irritation primarily is caused by fiberglass with diameters exceeding 4.5 µm. Controversy surrounds whether individuals with dermatographism are more susceptible to fiberglass dermatitis. Most workers with irritant contact dermatitis resulting from fiberglass develop hardening, in which they tolerate further cutaneous exposure to fiberglass.
• Mechanical trauma: Pressure produces callus formation. Pounding produces petechia or ecchymosis. Sudden trauma or friction produces blistering in the epidermis. Repeated rubbing or scratching produces lichenification. Sweating and friction appear to be the main cause of dermatitis that appears under soccer shin guards in children.¹⁴
• Rubber gloves: Some rubber gloves may provoke direct cutaneous irritation. Many workers complain of irritation from the powder in rubber gloves. Remember that gloves compromised by a hole may allow an irritant to enter; occlusion dramatically increases skin damage from the irritant. Occlusion accentuates the effects, good or bad, of topical agents. Kerosene may produce skin changes similar to that of toxic epidermal necrolysis following occluded cutaneous exposure. Excessive amounts of ethylene oxide in surgical sheets also may produce similar changes.
• Sodium lauryl sulfate: This chemical is found in some topical medications, particularly acne medications, and is a classic experimental cutaneous irritant.
• Hydrofluoric acid: A hydrofluoric acid burn is a medical emergency. Remember that onset of clinical manifestations may be delayed after the acute exposure (crucial to diagnosis). Unfortunately, hydrofluoric acid burns are most frequent on the digits where the pain is most severe and management is most difficult (see Hydrofluoric Acid Burns).
• Alkalis: Skin surfaces normally have an acidic pH and alkalis (eg, many soaps) produce more irritation than many acids. The "acid mantle" of the stratum corneum seems to be important for both permeability barrier formation and cutaneous antimicrobial defense. Use of skin cleansing agents, especially synthetic detergents with a pH of approximately 5.5 rather than alkaline pH, may help prevent skin disease.¹⁵

Differential Diagnoses

Workup

Laboratory Studies

• A bacterial culture can be obtained in cases complicated by secondary bacterial infection.
• A KOH examination may be performed and samples for mycology may be obtained to exclude superficial tinea infections or candidal infections, depending on site and morphology of lesions.
• Findings of significantly elevated serum immunoglobulin E occasionally are useful to substantiate an atopic diathesis in the absence of a personal or family history of atopy.

Procedures

• Patch testing can be performed to diagnose contact allergies, but no patch test exists that proves that a cutaneous irritant is responsible for a particular case of irritant contact dermatitis. Diagnosis rests on exclusion of allergic contact dermatitis and history of sufficient exposure to a cutaneous irritant. Also see the following clinical guideline summaries:
  • Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. Part 1¹⁶
  • Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. Part 2¹⁷
• Skin biopsy can help exclude other disorders, such as tinea, psoriasis, or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. All clinical cases of dermatitis are similar histologically. Skin biopsy of skin lesions of the palms and soles has several potential pitfalls. The stratum corneum and epidermis are particularly thick on the palms and soles. This makes the histologic diagnosis of psoriasis more difficult and increases the possibility that the biopsy specimen lacks sufficient dermis for optimal diagnosis. An overly deep skin biopsy of the thenar area can cut the motor nerve, which is the recurrent branch of the median nerve. A biopsy from the sole may leave a chronic painful scar on which the patient must walk. A saucerized shave biopsy is usually the most suitable method.

Histologic Findings

The histopathology of acute experimental irritant contact dermatitis has been studied to a greater extent than chronic irritant contact dermatitis, which is the primary clinical complaint.

Cellular changes seen in the skin vary according to the chemical nature and concentration of the irritant applied, duration of exposure, severity of ensuing response, and time of sampling for acute irritant contact dermatitis. Many primary irritants cause overt necrosis if applied in a sufficiently high concentration for sufficient time.

Most histologic examinations of irritant contact dermatitis reveal some degree of intercellular edema or spongiosis in the epidermis. Spongiosis usually is less pronounced than that seen in allergic contact dermatitis reactions.

Parakeratosis also is observed widely in irritant contact dermatitis reactions.

The histology of chronic irritant contact dermatitis is one of hyperkeratosis with areas of parakeratosis, moderate-to-marked epidermal hyperplasia (acanthosis), and elongation of the rete ridges.

Treatment

Medical Care

Acute irritant contact dermatitis reactions to potent irritants (eg, acids, alkaline solutions) are comparable to a chemical burn and can be graded like thermal burns (ie, first-, second-, or third-degree burns). With appropriate symptomatic management, the prognosis for this type of irritant contact dermatitis is usually good, and, unless the dermis is damaged, no permanent scarring should occur. See Burns, Chemical for more information.

An inflammatory reaction from acute delayed irritant contact dermatitis to an agent such as benzalkonium chloride (eg, zephiran) rarely needs treatment and usually resolves with cessation of exposure.

• Topical corticosteroids and immunomodulators are of unproven use in treating irritant contact dermatitis. Corticosteroids were found ineffective in treating the surfactant-induced irritant dermatitis when compared with the vehicle and with the untreated control.¹⁸ Topical tacrolimus is an irritant that may produce further stinging and irritation in persons with irritant contact dermatitis.¹⁹
• Creams containing ceramides (eg, Impruv, Cerave) may be particularly helpful in restoring the epidermal barrier in persons with irritant contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis.
• Creams containing dimethicone (eg, Cetaphil cream) can be helpful in restoring the epidermal barrier in persons with work-related irritant contact dermatitis.
• Most soaps and detergents are alkaline and induce an increase in cutaneous pH, which affects the physiologic protective acid mantle of the skin by decreasing the fat content. Disruption of stratum corneum and changes in pH are key elements in the induction of irritant contact dermatitis and pruritus by soaps. These conditions are exacerbated in the winter months in patients with dry, sensitive skin.
• A new generation of cleansers (synthetic detergents, or syndets) has emerged. Syndets with a pH approximately 5.5 seem to be especially relevant because they do not modify skin pH. Most bar soaps and liquid detergents available on the market are a mixture of soap and syndet. A study found that Dove and Cetaphil had a lower irritant effect than the other soaps tested. Interestingly, no significant correlation was made between the price of the products and their irritation potential.
• Irritant contact dermatitis is a frequent problem in health care workers, due to frequent hand washing. The best antimicrobial efficacy can be achieved with ethanol (60-85%), isopropanol (60-80%), and N -propanol (60-80%). The antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine (2-4%) and triclosan (1-2%) is both lower and slower and carries a risk of bacterial resistance. The use of alcohol-based hand rubs containing various emollients instead of irritating soaps and detergents is one strategy to reduce skin damage, dryness, and irritation in health care workers. Irritant contact dermatitis occurs most frequently with preparations containing 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, less frequent with nonantimicrobial soaps and preparations containing lower concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate, and least frequent with well-formulated alcohol-based hand rubs containing emollients and other skin conditioners.

A clinical guideline summary from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Contact Dermatitis: A Practice Parameter, may be helpful.²⁰

Consultations

• Multidisciplinary consultations may be required when many workers become affected with irritant contact dermatitis in a workplace. Identifying and remediating the causes of widespread irritant contact dermatitis interfering with workplace productivity and worker quality of life is important.
• Any patient with hydrofluoric acid burn should be evaluated as a medical emergency by a physician experienced in the management of hydrofluoric exposures and burns. Consider regional intravenous infusion of calcium gluconate as a therapeutic option in hydrofluoric acid burns to forearm, hand, or digits when topical therapy fails.

Activity

Activities of daily living and work may be reduced by severe irritant contact dermatitis.

Medication

Use of bland emollients, avoidance of irritation, and use of bland barrier creams such as those containing dimethicone are the mainstays of treatment for irritant contact dermatitis. A number of agents commonly found in therapeutic products for the skin (eg, propylene glycol, lactic acid, urea, salicylic acid) may produce further skin inflammation and may need to be avoided in these individuals. Topical corticosteroids play a limited role in the treatment of irritant contact dermatitis. They do not address the process directly, but they may be helpful for superimposed eczematous features.

Corticosteroids, topical

Immunosuppressives with anti-inflammatory properties that modify the body's immune response to diverse stimuli. Other actions include vasoconstriction and antiproliferation. Have limited use in the treatment of irritant contact dermatitis.

Amcinonide (Cyclocort)

Highly potent, fluorinated corticosteroid (class 2-3). Suppresses mitotic activity and causes vasoconstriction. Stimulates synthesis of enzymes needed to decrease inflammation. May suppress histamine release associated with pruritus.

Dosing

Adult

Apply thin film up to tid

Pediatric

Not established

Interactions

None reported

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; fungal or viral infection, including herpes simplex or tubercular skin lesions; avoid application on face, groin, or axilla

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Systemic effects may occur if used over large areas, denuded areas of the body, or prolonged periods of time; occlusive dressing should not be used in presence of infection or weeping lesions; prolonged use may result in atrophy (especially in groin, axilla, and face), rosacealike eruption, striae distensae, or increased skin fragility

Fluocinolone (Synalar, Synalar-HP, Fluonid)

Fluorinated corticosteroid of mid potency with 0.025% (class 4-5) and mild potency with 0.01% (class 6).

Dosing

Adult

Apply sparingly up to qid as severity warrants

Pediatric

Administer as in adults

Interactions

None reported

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; herpes simplex infection; fungal, viral, or tubercular skin lesions

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

May cause systemic effects if used over large areas, on denuded areas, or for prolonged periods; do not use occlusive dressing in presence of infection, in weeping lesions, or for ultrapotent corticosteroids; rarely, worsening or no improvement may signify allergy to corticosteroids

Follow-up

Further Inpatient Care

• Inpatient care is required only in severe cutaneous irritant contact dermatitis, ie, chemical burns from hydrofluoric acid or, occasionally, from freshly mixed Portland cement.

Further Outpatient Care

• Individuals with irritant contact dermatitis frequently are seen, particularly from the workplace. Identifying and minimizing exposure to cutaneous irritants at home and work is crucial.
• Advise individuals to use bland emollients after washing hands with soap and before sleep. Cleansers may be ranked by their irritancy.²¹ Recommend mild skin cleansers (eg, Aquanil, Cetaphil cleanser, Oilatum AD, Neutrogena cleanser) in place of soap on affected areas.
• Instruct individuals to refrain from the use of inappropriate solvents (eg, gasoline) or abrasives (eg, pumice stone) to cleanse hands; these directly defat or traumatize the skin.

Complications

• Irritant contact dermatitis increases the risk of sensitization to topical medications.
• Skin lesions may become colonized secondarily and/or infected, particularly by Staphylococcus aureus.
• Secondary neurodermatitis (lichen simplex chronicus) may develop in individuals with irritant contact dermatitis, particularly in those with workplace exposures or under psychologic stress.
• Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation may occur in areas affected by irritant contact dermatitis or persist after resolution of irritant contact dermatitis in individuals with more pigmented skin.
• Scarring may occur after corrosive agent exposure, excoriation, or artifact, causing ulceration.

Prognosis

• Prognosis is good for nonatopic individuals in whom irritant contact dermatitis is diagnosed and managed promptly.
• Individuals with atopic dermatitis remain highly susceptible to irritant contact dermatitis and may find that the tasks of many common occupations (eg, nursing, hairdressing) produce too much direct skin inflammation to continue with these careers.
• Hardening may be specific to the irritant inducing the hardening phenomenon and does not occur in all persons exposed long term to an irritant.¹ Hardened skin may also have a thickened stratum granulosum with changes in the expression of various inflammatory mediators and markers.¹
• An induction of an increase in the stratum corneum lipid ceramide 1 may play a key role as a protection mechanism against irritation by repeated application of sodium lauryl sulfate.^3,4

Patient Education

• Remind individuals that they must continue to avoid cutaneous irritants; they will redevelop or aggravate dermatitis if they continue to have the same skin care exposures that resulted in irritant contact dermatitis. The possibility of secondary or complicating allergic contact dermatitis always must be borne in mind.
• For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Skin, Hair, and Nails Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Contact Dermatitis.

Miscellaneous

Medicolegal Pitfalls

• Irritant contact dermatitis is a major occupational disease. The physician needs to take an occupational history from adults with suspect irritant contact dermatitis.
• Secondary lichen simplex chronicus contributes to chronicity and is compensable according to American Medical Association guidelines for impairment rating.

Special Concerns

• Presence of irritant contact dermatitis facilitates the development of allergic contact dermatitis (many cutaneous allergens also are irritants). Cutaneous irritation sets the stage for cutaneous sensitization to agents applied to the area of cutaneous inflammation.
• Most affected workers have a degree of permanent injury that is lower than that of other occupational diseases; however, the compensation pay was higher for skin diseases than for diseases of the respiratory system or musculoskeletal disorders, according to a study in Denmark.
• Irritant contact dermatitis is the most common occupational skin disorder; skin disorders comprise up to 40% of occupational illnesses.

Multimedia

Media file 1: Chronic irritant contact dermatitis of the hands in an older worker; the condition resulted in early retirement.

References

1. Watkins SA, Maibach HI. The hardening phenomenon in irritant contact dermatitis: an interpretative update. Contact Dermatitis. Mar 2009;60(3):123-30. [Medline].

2. Jacobs JJ, Lehe CL, Hasegawa H, Elliott GR, Das PK. Skin irritants and contact sensitizers induce Langerhans cell migration and maturation at irritant concentration. Exp Dermatol. Jun 2006;15(6):432-40. [Medline].

3. Fluhr JW, Akengin A, Bornkessel A, et al. Additive impairment of the barrier function by mechanical irritation, occlusion and sodium lauryl sulphate in vivo. Br J Dermatol. Jul 2005;153(1):125-31. [Medline].

4. Heinemann C, Paschold C, Fluhr J, et al. Induction of a hardening phenomenon by repeated application of SLS: analysis of lipid changes in the stratum corneum. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(4):290-5. [Medline].

5. de Jongh CM, Khrenova L, Verberk MM, Calkoen F, van Dijk FJ, Voss H, et al. Loss-of-function polymorphisms in the filaggrin gene are associated with an increased susceptibility to chronic irritant contact dermatitis: a case-control study. Br J Dermatol. Sep 2008;159(3):621-7. [Medline].

6. Forrester BG, Roth VS. Hand dermatitis in intensive care units. J Occup Environ Med. Oct 1998;40(10):881-5. [Medline].

7. Cvetkovski RS, Rothman KJ, Olsen J, et al. Relation between diagnoses on severity, sick leave and loss of job among patients with occupational hand eczema. Br J Dermatol. Jan 2005;152(1):93-8. [Medline].

8. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, Kretz J, Diepgen TL. Importance of irritant contact dermatitis in occupational skin disease. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3(4):283-9. [Medline].

9. Mangion SM, Beulke SH, Braitberg G. Hydrofluoric acid burn from a household rust remover. Med J Aust. Sep 3 2001;175(5):270-1. [Medline].

10. Slotosch CM, Kampf G, Löffler H. Effects of disinfectants and detergents on skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis. Oct 2007;57(4):235-41. [Medline].

11. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF Jr. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. 4^th ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1995.

12. Kartono F, Maibach HI. Irritants in combination with a synergistic or additive effect on the skin response: an overview of tandem irritation studies. Contact Dermatitis. Jun 2006;54(6):303-12. [Medline].

13. Löffler H, Kampf G, Schmermund D, Maibach HI. How irritant is alcohol?. Br J Dermatol. Jul 2007;157(1):74-81. [Medline].

14. Weston WL, Morelli JG. Dermatitis under soccer shin guards: allergy or contact irritant reaction?. Pediatr Dermatol. Jan-Feb 2006;23(1):19-20. [Medline].

15. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Korting HC. The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;19(6):296-302. [Medline].

16. [Guideline] Bernstein IL, Li JT, Bernstein DI, et al. Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. Part 1. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Mar 2008.

17. [Guideline] Bernstein IL, Li JT, Bernstein DI, et al. Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. Part 2. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Mar 2008.

18. Levin C, Zhai H, Bashir S, et al. Efficacy of corticosteroids in acute experimental irritant contact dermatitis?. Skin Res Technol. Nov 2001;7(4):214-8. [Medline].

19. Fuchs M, Schliemann-Willers S, Heinemann C, Elsner P. Tacrolimus enhances irritation in a 5-day human irritancy in vivo model. Contact Dermatitis. May 2002;46(5):290-4. [Medline].

20. [Guideline] American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Contact dermatitis: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. Sep 2006;97(3 Suppl 2):S1-38. [Medline].

21. Lakshmi C, Srinivas CR, Anand CV, Mathew AC. Irritancy ranking of 31 cleansers in the Indian market in a 24-h patch test. Int J Cosmet Sci. Aug 2008;30(4):277-83. [Medline].

22. Baranda L, Gonzalez-Amaro R, Torres-Alvarez B, Alvarez C, Ramirez V. Correlation between pH and irritant effect of cleansers marketed for dry skin. Int J Dermatol. Aug 2002;41(8):494-9. [Medline].

23. Beltrani VS. Occupational dermatoses. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. Apr 2003;3(2):115-23. [Medline].

24. Bryld LE, Hindsberger C, Kyvik KO, Agner T, Menne T. Risk factors influencing the development of hand eczema in a population-based twin sample. Br J Dermatol. Dec 2003;149(6):1214-20. [Medline].

25. Choi JM, Lee JY, Cho BK. Chronic irritant contact dermatitis: recovery time in man. Contact Dermatitis. May 2000;42(5):264-9. [Medline].

26. Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin J-P, eds. Contact Dermatitis. 4th. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2006.

27. Goldner R. Work-related irritant contact dermatitis. Occup Med. Jan-Mar 1994;9(1):37-44. [Medline].

28. Hogan DJ. The prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis. Occup Med. Jan-Mar 1994;9(1):53-8. [Medline].

29. Hogan DJ, Dannaker CJ, Maibach HI. The prognosis of contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. Aug 1990;23(2 Pt 1):300-7. [Medline].

30. Kampf G, Kramer A. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clin Microbiol Rev. Oct 2004;17(4):863-93, table of contents. [Medline].

31. Kligman AM. The identification of contact allergens by human assay. 3. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. J Invest Dermatol. Nov 1966;47(5):393-409. [Medline].

32. McFadden JP, Basketter DA. Contact allergy, irritancy and 'danger'. Contact Dermatitis. Mar 2000;42(3):123-7. [Medline].

33. Rietschel RL, Nethercott JR, Emmett EA, et al. Methylchloroisothiazolinone-methylisothiazolinone reactions in patients screened for vehicle and preservative hypersensitivity. J Am Acad Dermatol. May 1990;22(5 Pt 1):734-8. [Medline].

34. Smith HR, Basketter DA, McFadden JP. Irritant dermatitis, irritancy and its role in allergic contact dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol. Mar 2002;27(2):138-46. [Medline].

35. Willis CM, Reiche L, Wilkinson JD. Immunocytochemical demonstration of reduced Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase levels following topical application of dithranol and sodium lauryl sulphate: an indication of the role of oxidative stress in acute irritant contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. Jan-Feb 1998;8(1):8-12. [Medline].

36. Willis CM, Reiche L, Wilkinson JD. Keratin 17 is expressed during the course of SLS-induced irritant contact dermatitis, but unlike keratin 16, the degree of expression is unrelated to the density of dividing keratinocytes. Contact Dermatitis. Jul 1998;39(1):21-7. [Medline].

37. Willis CM, Stephens CJ, Wilkinson JD. Differential patterns of epidermal leukocyte infiltration in patch test reactions to structurally unrelated chemical irritants. J Invest Dermatol. Sep 1993;101(3):364-70. [Medline].

38. Willis CM, Stephens CJ, Wilkinson JD. Selective expression of immune-associated surface antigens by keratinocytes in irritant contact dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. Apr 1991;96(4):505-11. [Medline].

39. Willis CM, Young E, Brandon DR, Wilkinson JD. Immunopathological and ultrastructural findings in human allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. Sep 1986;115(3):305-16. [Medline].

Keywords

irritant contact dermatitis, contact dermatitis, nonallergic contact dermatitis, ICD

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Daniel J Hogan, MD, Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine (Dermatology), NOVA Southeastern University; Investigator, Hill Top Research, Florida Research Center
Daniel J Hogan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Contact Dermatitis Society, and Canadian Dermatology Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

John D Wilkinson, MD, MBBS, MRCS, FRCP, Chairman, Clinical Director, Department of Dermatology, Amersham Hospital and High Wycombe Hospital, UK
John D Wilkinson, MD, MBBS, MRCS, FRCP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and Royal College of Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Michael J Wells, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Michael J Wells, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Paul Krusinski, MD, Director of Dermatology, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Fletcher Allen Health Care, University of Vermont
Paul Krusinski, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Physicians, and Society for Investigative Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Catherine M Quirk, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania
Catherine M Quirk, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Dirk M Elston, MD, Director, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

© 1994- by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)