eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Allergy & Immunology
Id Reaction (Autoeczematization): Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Feb 25, 2009
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
Differential Diagnoses
Workup
Laboratory Studies
- Laboratory workup of id reactions is clearly indicated for dermatophytids.
- Strict criteria include a proven dermatophyte infection and a positive skin test finding for a group-specific trichophytin antigen.
- Absence of fungi in the dermatophytid lesions and clearing of the dermatophytid after the fungus is eradicated are necessary to confirm a definitive diagnosis of a dermatophytid reaction.
Other Tests
- Patch testing may be needed to exclude primary or secondary allergic contact dermatitis.
Procedures
- Biopsy for routine hematoxylin and eosin staining may be helpful in excluding noneczematous dermatoses, which may appear morphologically similar to an id reaction.
- Patch testing may be necessary to identify a contact allergen.
Histologic Findings
Histopathology of the typical papulovesicular lesion reveals a superficial perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate with a spongiotic epidermis, often with vesiculation. Small numbers of eosinophils may be present in the dermal infiltrate. By definition, infectious agents should not be found in the specimens.
More on Id Reaction (Autoeczematization) |
| Overview: Id Reaction (Autoeczematization) |
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Id Reaction (Autoeczematization) |
| Treatment & Medication: Id Reaction (Autoeczematization) |
| Follow-up: Id Reaction (Autoeczematization) |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Brown A, Sorey W. To Itch, Perchance to Scratch. Clin Pediatr (Phila). Nov 17 2008;[Medline].
Brenner S, Ophir J, Krakowski A. Pediculid. An unusual -id reaction to pediculosis capitis. Dermatologica. 1984;168(4):189-91. [Medline].
Cunningham MJ, Zone JJ, Petersen MJ, Green JA. Circulating activated (DR-positive) T lymphocytes in a patient with autoeczematization. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 1986;14(6):1039-41. [Medline].
Kasteler JS, Petersen MJ, Vance JE, Zone JJ. Circulating activated T lymphocytes in autoeczematization. Arch Dermatol. Jun 1992;128(6):795-8. [Medline].
Al Aboud K, Al Hawsawi K, Alfadley A. Tinea incognito on the hand causing a facial dermatophytid reaction. Acta Derm Venereol. 2003;83(1):59. [Medline].
Atzori L, Pau M, Aste M. Erythema multiforme ID reaction in atypical dermatophytosis: a case report. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. Nov 2003;17(6):699-701. [Medline].
Crum N, Hardaway C, Graham B. Development of an idlike reaction during treatment for acute pulmonary histoplasmosis: a new cutaneous manifestation in histoplasmosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 2003;48(2 Suppl):S5-6. [Medline].
Choudhri SH, Magro CM, Crowson AN, Nicolle LE. An Id reaction to Mycobacterium leprae: first documented case. Cutis. Oct 1994;54(4):282-6. [Medline].
Morrison JG, Fourie ED. The papulonecrotic tuberculide. From Arthus reaction to lupus vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. Sep 1974;91(3):263-70. [Medline].
Ackerman AB, Chongchitnant N, Sanchez J, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis/nummular dermatitis/dyshidrotic dermatitis/id reaction. In: Histologic Diagnosis of Inflammatory Skin Diseases. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1997:184-6.
Belsito DV. Autosensitization dermatitis. In: Freedberg M, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, et al, eds. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1999:1462-4.
Brenner S, Wolf R, Landau M. Scabid: an unusual id reaction to scabies. Int J Dermatol. Feb 1993;32(2):128-9. [Medline].
Champion RH, Burton JL, Burns DA, et al. Textbook of Dermatology. Boston, Mass: Blackwell; 1998:650-1,1199-1200,1315,1344.
Elder DE, Elenitsas R, Jaworsky C, et al. Noninfectious vesiculobullous and vesiculopustular diseases. In: Lever's Histopathology of the Skin. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:214.
Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, et al. Superficial fungal infection. In: Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1999:2340-1.
Fritsch P, Reider N. Eczematous Group. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo J, Rapini R, eds. Dermatology. Vol 1. Mo: Mosby: St. Louis; 2003:221-2.
Gonzalez-Amaro R, Baranda L, Abud-Mendoza C, Delgado SP, Moncada B. Autoeczematization is associated with abnormal immune recognition of autologous skin antigens. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jan 1993;28(1):56-60. [Medline].
Haxthausen H. Generalized ids autosensitization in varicose eczemas. Acta Derm Venereol. 1955;35(4-5):271-80. [Medline].
Heng MC, Allen SG. Predominance of CD8 subset in id eruption of poison oak-induced dermatitis. Australas J Dermatol. 1991;32(2):93-100. [Medline].
Hurwitz S. Eczematous eruptions in childhood. Clin Pediatr Dermatol. 1993;77-8.
Leggiadro RJ, Boscamp JR, Sapadin AN. Temporary tattoo dermatitis. J Pediatr. May 2003;142(5):586. [Medline].
Lian J, Dundas G, Tron V, Lauzon G, Roa W. radiotherapy-induced ID reaction. Am J Clin Oncol. Feb 2005;28(1):105-6. [Medline].
Lu LK, Dunnick CA. Navel history. Am J Med. Mar 2006;119(3):241-3. [Medline].
Roper SS, Jones HE. An animal model for altering the irritability threshold of normal skin. Contact Dermatitis. Aug 1985;13(2):91-7. [Medline].
Suwattee P, Warshaw EM. Self-Assessment examination of the American Academy of Dermatology-Generalized itchy eruption. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(5):923-5.
Trattner A, David M. Tefillin dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. May 2005;52(5):831-3. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
Id reaction, autoeczematization, autosensitization, pruritic rash, dermatophytids, dermatophytid reactions, dermatophyte infections, stasis dermatitis
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Id Reaction (Autoeczematization)