Contact Urticaria Syndrome Follow-up
- Author: Saqib Bashir, MB, ChB, MD, MRCP; Chief Editor: Dirk M Elston, MD more...
Further Inpatient Care
- Routinely, admission for medical care is not indicated for contact urticaria syndrome. Additional inpatient care is rarely indicated.
Further Outpatient Care
- If a patient has immunologic contact urticaria, a follow-up visit to verify the patient's understanding of the condition may be indicated.
Transfer
- Transfer is rarely indicated.
Deterrence/Prevention
- Contact urticaria syndrome is treated by prevention. This highlights the importance of clinical testing to identify the causative substance. The patient should then be advised to avoid that substance or products containing that substance to prevent recurrence.
Complications
- A delayed allergic eczematous dermatitis reaction can occur (see Mortality/Morbidity). Extracutaneous contact urticaria syndrome has led to anaphylaxis in severe cases and is believed to be a cause of death intraoperatively in some cases (due to allergy to latex).
Prognosis
- The prognosis is entirely dependent on the ubiquity of the etiologic substance and the patient's ability to avoid contact with it. However, even in cases of severe immunologic contact urticaria to latex, the long-term prognosis can be good if patients take an active role in controlling their environment by educating themselves and others.
Patient Education
- Patient education is critical to prevention. For ubiquitous allergens, such as latex, multiple consumer educational sites are available on the Internet. Most of these sites can be accessed from the US Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
- For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Allergy Center and Skin, Hair, and Nails Center. Additionally, see eMedicine's patient education article Hives and Angioedema.
Maibach HI, Johnson HL. Contact urticaria syndrome. Contact urticaria to diethyltoluamide (immediate-type hypersensitivity). Arch Dermatol. Jun 1975;111(6):726-30. [Medline].
Turjanmaa K, Alenius H, Makinen-Kiljunen S, Reunala T, Palosuo T. Natural rubber latex allergy. Allergy. Sep 1996;51(9):593-602. [Medline].
Shriner DL, Maibach HI. Regional variation of nonimmunologic contact urticaria. Functional map of the human face. Skin Pharmacol. 1996;9(5):312-21. [Medline].
Elpern DJ. The syndrome of immediate reactivities (contact urticaria syndrome). An historical study from a dermatology practice. II. The atopic diathesis and drug reactions. Hawaii Med J. Dec 1985;44(12):466-8. [Medline].
Elpern DJ. The syndrome of immediate reactivities (contact urticaria syndrome) an historical study from a dermatology practice. III. General discussion and conclusions. Hawaii Med J. Jan 1986;45(1):10-2. [Medline].
Ownby DR, Ownby HE, McCullough J, Shafer AW. The prevalence of anti-latex IgE antibodies in 1000 volunteer blood donors. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Jun 1996;97(6):1188-92. [Medline].
Suneja T, Belsito DV. Occupational dermatoses in health care workers evaluated for suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. May 2008;58(5):285-90. [Medline].
Kanerva L, Toikkanen J, Jolanki R, Estlander T. Statistical data on occupational contact urticaria. Contact Dermatitis. Oct 1996;35(4):229-33. [Medline].
Kanerva L, Toikkanen J, Jolanki R, Estlander T. Statistical data on occupational contact urticaria. Contact Dermatitis. Oct 1996;35(4):229-33. [Medline].
Allmers H, Schmengler J, John SM. Decreasing incidence of occupational contact urticaria caused by natural rubber latex allergy in German health care workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Aug 2004;114(2):347-51. [Medline].
Tang MB, Leow YH, Ng V, Koh D, Goh CL. Latex sensitisation in healthcare workers in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. Jun 2005;34(5):376-82. [Medline].
Turjanmaa K. Incidence of immediate allergy to latex gloves in hospital personnel. Contact Dermatitis. Nov 1987;17(5):270-5. [Medline].
Ausili E, Tabacco F, Focarelli B, Nucera E, Patriarca G, Rendeli C. Prevalence of latex allergy in spina bifida: genetic and environmental risk factors. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. May-Jun 2007;11(3):149-53. [Medline].
Draisci G, Nucera E, Pollastrini E, Forte E, Zanfini B, Pinto R. Anaphylactic reactions during cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. Jan 2007;16(1):63-7. [Medline].
Williams JD, Lee AY, Matheson MC, Frowen KE, Noonan AM, Nixon RL. Occupational contact urticaria: Australian data. Br J Dermatol. Jul 2008;159(1):125-31. [Medline].
Amin S, Maibach HI. Immunologic Contact Urticaria Definition. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI, eds. Contact Urticaria Syndrome. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare USA; 1997:11-26.
Gimenez-Arnau A, Maurer M, De La Cuadra J, Maibach H. Immediate contact skin reactions, an update of Contact Urticaria, Contact Urticaria Syndrome and Protein Contact Dermatitis -- "A Never Ending Story". Eur J Dermatol. Sep-Oct 2010;20(5):552-62. [Medline].
Frosch PJ, Kligman AM. The soap chamber test. A new method for assessing the irritancy of soaps. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jul 1979;1(1):35-41. [Medline].
Gollhausen R, Kligman AM. Human assay for identifying substances which induce non-allergic contact urticaria: the NICU-test. Contact Dermatitis. Aug 1985;13(2):98-106. [Medline].
von Krogh G, Maibach HI. The Contact Urticaria Syndrome - 1982. Semin Dermatol. 1982;1:59-66.
Spoerl D, Scherer K, Bircher AJ. Contact urticaria with systemic symptoms due to hexylene glycol in a topical corticosteroid: case report and review of hypersensitivity to glycols. Dermatology. 2010;220(3):238-42. [Medline].
Amaro C, Goossens A. Immunological occupational contact urticaria and contact dermatitis from proteins: a review. Contact Dermatitis. Feb 2008;58(2):67-75. [Medline].
Asero R. Peach-induced contact urticaria is associated with lipid transfer protein sensitization. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;154(4):345-8. [Medline].
Garty BZ, Danon YL. Processionary caterpillar dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. Mar 1985;2(3):194-6. [Medline].
Vega J, Vega JM, Moneo I, Armentia A, Caballero ML, Miranda A. Occupational immunologic contact urticaria from pine processionary caterpillar (Thaumetopoea pityocampa): experience in 30 cases. Contact Dermatitis. Feb 2004;50(2):60-4. [Medline].
Vega JM, Moneo I, Armentia A, Vega J, De la Fuente R, Fernandez A. Pine processionary caterpillar as a new cause of immunologic contact urticaria. Contact Dermatitis. Sep 2000;43(3):129-32. [Medline].
Lahti A. Non-immunologic contact urticaria. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1980;Suppl 91:1-49. [Medline].
Filon FL, Radman G. Latex allergy: a follow up study of 1040 healthcare workers. Occup Environ Med. Feb 2006;63(2):121-5. [Medline].
Bourrain JL. Occupational contact urticaria. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. Feb 2006;30(1):39-46. [Medline].
Hannuksela M. Mechanisms in contact urticaria. Clin Dermatol. Jul-Aug 1997;15(4):619-22. [Medline].
Jaeger D, Kleinhans D, Czuppon AB, Baur X. Latex-specific proteins causing immediate-type cutaneous, nasal, bronchial, and systemic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Mar 1992;89(3):759-68. [Medline].
Jovanovic M, Karadaglic D, Brkic S. Contact urticaria and allergic contact dermatitis to lidocaine in a patient sensitive to benzocaine and propolis. Contact Dermatitis. Feb 2006;54(2):124-6. [Medline].
Lahti A. Nonimmunologic Contact Urticaria. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI, eds. Contact Urticaria Syndrome. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare USA; 1997:5-10.
Lahti A. Immediate contact reactions. In: Rycroft RJG, Menne T, Frosch PJ, eds. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1995:Chapters 2, 3.
Majmudar V, Azam NA, Finch T. Contact urticaria to Cannabis sativa. Contact Dermatitis. Feb 2006;54(2):127. [Medline].

