Keloid and Hypertrophic Scar Treatment & Management

  • Author: Brian Berman, MD, PhD; Chief Editor: Dirk M Elston, MD   more...
 
Updated: May 14, 2010
 

Medical Care

No single therapeutic modality is best for all keloids. The location, size, and depth of the lesion; the age of the patient; and the past response to treatment determine the type of therapy used.

Prevention is key, but therapeutic treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids includes occlusive dressings, compression therapy, intralesional corticosteroid injections, cryosurgery, excision, radiation therapy, laser therapy, interferon (IFN) therapy, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, bleomycin, verapamil, retinoic acid, imiquimod 5% cream, tamoxifen, tacrolimus, botulinum toxin, and over-the-counter treatments (eg, onion extract; combination of hydrocortisone, silicon, and vitamin E).

Other promising therapies include antiangiogenic factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (eg, bevacizumab), phototherapy (photodynamic therapy [PDT], UVA-1 therapy, narrowband UVB therapy), transforming growth factor (TGF)–beta3, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors (etanercept), and recombinant human interleukin (rhIL-10), which are directed at decreasing collagen synthesis.

Next

Prevention

Prevention is the first rule in keloid therapy. Avoid performing nonessential cosmetic surgery in patients known to form keloids; however, the risk is lower among patients who have only earlobe lesions. Close all surgical wounds with minimal tension. Incisions should not cross joint spaces. Avoid making midchest incisions, and ensure that incisions follow skin creases whenever possible.

Previous
Next

Standard Treatments

These include occlusive dressings, compression therapy, and intralesional corticosteroid injections.

Occlusive dressings

Occlusive dressings include silicone gel sheets and dressings, nonsilicone occlusive sheets, and Cordran tape. These measures have been used with varied success. Antikeloidal effects appear to result from a combination of occlusion and hydration, rather than from an effect of the silicone.

Previous studies have shown that in patients treated with silicone occlusive sheeting with pressure worn 24 h/d for up to 12 months, 34% showed excellent improvement, 37.5% showed moderate improvement, and 28% demonstrated no or slight improvement.

Of patients treated with semipermeable, semiocclusive, nonsilicone-based dressings for 8 weeks, 60% experienced flattening of keloids, 71% had reduced pain, 78% had reduced tenderness, 80% had reduced pruritus, 87.5% had reduced erythema, and 90% were satisfied with the treatment.

Cordran tape is a clear surgical tape that contains flurandrenolide, a steroid that is uniformly distributed on each square centimeter of the tape, and it has been shown to soften and flatten keloids over time.

Compression therapy

Compression therapy involves pressure, which has long been known to have thinning effects on skin. Reduction in the cohesiveness of collagen fibers in pressure-treated hypertrophic scars has been demonstrated by electron microscopy.

Compression treatments include button compression, pressure earrings, ACE bandages, elastic adhesive bandages, compression wraps, spandex or elastane (Lycra) bandages, and support bandages. In one study, button compression (2 buttons sandwiching the earlobe applied after keloid excision) prevented recurrence during 8 months to 4 years of follow-up observation.

Other pressure devices include pressure earrings and pressure-gradient garments made of lightweight porous Dacron, spandex (also known as elastane), bobbinet fabric (usually worn 12-24 h/d), and zinc oxide adhesive plaster. Overall, 60% of patients treated with these devices showed 75-100% improvement.

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids, specifically intralesional corticosteroid injections, have been the mainstay of treatment. Corticosteroids reduce excessive scarring by reducing collagen synthesis, altering glucosaminoglycan synthesis, and reducing production of inflammatory mediators and fibroblast proliferation during wound healing. The most commonly used corticosteroid is triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in concentrations of 10-40 mg/mL administered intralesionally with a 25- to 27-gauge needle at 4- to 6-week intervals.

Intralesional steroid therapy as a single modality and as an adjunct to excision has been shown to be efficacious in various studies. Response rates varied from 50-100%, with recurrence rates of 9-50% in completely resolved scars. When combined with excision, postoperative intralesional TAC injections yielded a recurrence rate of 0-100%, with most studies citing a rate of less than 50%. Complications of repeated corticosteroid injections include atrophy, telangiectasia formation, and pigmentary alteration.

Previous
Next

Recent Innovations

New treatments for keloids and hypertrophic scars include intralesional IFN; 5-FU; doxorubicin; bleomycin; verapamil; retinoic acid; imiquimod 5% cream; tacrolimus; tamoxifen; botulinum toxin; TGF-beta3; rhIL-10; VEGF inhibitors; etanercept; mannose-6-phosphate inhibitors (M6P); etanercept; onion extract; the combination of hydrocortisone, silicon, and vitamin E; PDT; intense pulsed light (IPL); UVA-1; and narrowband UVB.

IFN therapy

IFN therapy, including IFN alfa, IFN beta, and IFN gamma, has been demonstrated in in vitro studies to reduce keloidal fibroblast production of collagen types I, III, and VI mRNA.

IFN alfa and IFN beta also reduce fibroblast production of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), which form the scaffolding for the deposition of dermal collagen. IFN gamma enhances GAG production.

IFN alfa, IFN beta, and IFN gamma have been shown to increase collagenase activity. Studies have shown that IFN gamma modulates a p53 apoptotic pathway by inducing apoptosis-related genes. p53 is a protein synthesized following DNA damage. Once damage is repaired, p53 is degraded. Mutations of this protein are believed to predispose cells to hyperproliferation, possibly resulting in keloid formation. In addition, p53 is a potent suppressor of interleukin (IL)–6, a cytokine implicated in hyperproliferative and fibrotic conditions.

IFN injected into the suture line of keloid excision sites may be prophylactic for reducing recurrences. Berman and Flores reported statistically significant fewer keloid recurrences in a study of 124 keloid lesions after postoperative IFN alfa-2b injection treatment (5 million U, 1 million U injected per cm of scar) into keloid excision sites (18%) versus excision alone (51.1%) and TAC treatment (58.4%).[2]

Tredget et al showed a significant increase in the rate of scar improvement compared with the control period of time (P = .004) after injecting 9 patients with hypertrophic scars with 1 X 106 units of human recombinant IFN alfa-2b subcutaneously, daily for 7 days, and then 2 X 106 units administered 3 times per week for 24 weeks in total.[3] Scar assessment (P < .05) and scar volume (P < .05) also improved after 3 months of treatment. No recurrences were reported after stopping IFN therapy.

Conejo-Mir et al reported that 66% of keloids (n = 20) did not recur after 3 years of follow-up after treating 30 keloids with ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser ablation followed by sublesional and perilesional injections of 3 million IU of IFN alfa-2b 3 times per week.[4]

In a 2008 prospective study, Lee et al reported decreases in depth (81.6%, P = .005) and volume (86.6%, P = .002) treating 20 keloids with a combination of intralesional TAC and IFN alfa-2b compared with only a nonsignificant improvement (P = .281 and P = .245, respectively) obtained in 20 keloids treated with TAC alone.[5]

Notably, however, several studies have failed to demonstrate the efficacy of IFN alfa-2b for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars, including a case series of 5 patients treated by Wong et al,[6] a case series by al-Khawajah of 22 patients with keloids using lower doses of IFN alfa-2b than in prior studies,[7] and a prospective randomized clinical trial by Davison et al in which 50 patients with keloids received intraoperative intradermal injections of IFN alfa-2b at 10 million U/mL or TAC at 40 mg/mL, both receiving an extra injection 1 week later.[8]

Hypertrophic scar intralesional injections of human recombinant IFN gamma at 200 mcg (6 X 106 U) per injection for 4 weeks have been reported by Pittet et al to be effective for relieving the symptoms in 6 of 7 patients and decreases in redness, swelling, firmness, and lesion area in 7 of 7 patients.[9] At week 16, the reappearance of symptoms was minimal in only 2 of 7 patients and a small increase in the lesion area occurred in 4 of 7 patients, although these lesions remained smaller than the original area.

5-Fluorouracil

5-FU, a pyrimidine analogue with antimetabolite activity, inhibits fibroblastic proliferation in tissue culture and is believed to reduce postoperative scarring by decreasing fibroblast proliferation. Its efficacy and safety have been reported when used as a monotherapy or when used in combination with other drugs (eg TAC) for the treatment of other fibrosing conditions, including infantile digital fibromatosis, knuckle pads, rheumatoid nodules, and adverse foreign body reaction and sarcoidal granulomatous complications after soft tissue filler injection. Some data suggest that 5-FU is effective in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and is somewhat effective in small keloids. Several studies have shown the effectiveness of 5-FU.

In a retrospective study of 1000 patients with hypertrophic scars and keloids over a 9-year period, the most effective regimen was found to be 0.1 mL of TAC (10 mg/mL) and 0.9 mL of 5-FU (50 mg/mL) up to 3 times a week.

A total of 85% of keloids showed more than 50% improvement in an open study by Kontochristopoulos et al in which 20 keloids were treated once weekly with intralesional 5-FU (50 mg/mL) for an average of 7 treatments, with a recurrence rate of 47% within 1 year of the treatment. The Ki-67 proliferative index was significantly reduced (P = .0001) after treatment.[10]

Nanda and Reddy treated 28 patients with multiple keloids in a prospective, randomized, uncontrolled clinical trial with weekly intralesional injections of 5-FU at 50 mg/mL and reported almost 80% of the patients showing more than 50% improvement. Regression from the periphery and flattening occurred in all patients. In 22 of 28 patients, the symptoms completely disappeared, while the rest showed a good response. Decrease in size was reported in 70% of the patients.[11]

5-FU in combination with other therapies significantly increases the efficacy over single modalities. In a randomized clinical trial by Asilian et al, 69 patients with keloids and hypertrophic scars were treated with a combination of 5-FU (50 mg/mL), TAC (40 mg/mL), and a 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser (PDL) at 5-7.5 J/cm2), showing that it was more effective than the TAC and TAC plus 5-FU.[12] At week 12, a statistically significant reduction in length, height, and width was observed in all groups compared with baseline (P < .05). In a randomized clinical trial, Manuskiatti and Fitzpatrick found a statistically significant clinical improvement in keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars using these 3 modalities separately and a combination of TAC and 5-FU compared with baseline. No difference was found between the 4 treatment modalities.[13]

5-FU was used to treat a patient with keloids and hypertrophic scars post facial dermabrasion. The patient received 6 intralesional injections of 5-FU with silicone sheets applied afterwards over a 3-month span. During 7 months of follow up, a significant improvement in the size, color, and texture of the scars was noticed. In addition, the pain and itching had fully resolved.[14]

Doxorubicin (Adriamycin)

Doxorubicin (Adriamycin) is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent that irreversibly inactivates prolyl 4-hydroxylase in human skin fibroblasts and has been shown to inhibit collagen alpha-chain assembly.

Sasaki et al showed through sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis that doxorubicin, at a clinically therapeutic concentration of 12.5 µm, inhibits the assembly of collagen triple-helical molecules.[15] SDS-PAGE analysis of control cultures showed a large fraction of [3H]proline-labeled procollagen polypeptides in triple-helical conformation; however, after the addition of doxorubicin at 12.5 µm, a very small amount of intact alpha-chains were found. These results suggest that the impaired wound healing observed in cancer patients who receive doxorubicin may result from the inhibition of prolyl 4-hydroxylase.

Another mechanism of doxorubicin-induced inhibition of collagen synthesis includes the inhibition of the enzyme prolidase, which is key in the process of collagen resynthesis, cleaving imidodipeptides containing C-terminal, and making proline available for its recycling and further generation of new collagen. Muszynska et al demonstrated this process in cultured human skin fibroblasts, also suggesting that this inhibition is a posttranslational event.[16, 17]

Other agents such as doxycycline, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ie, acetylsalicylic acid, sodium salicylate, phenylbutazone, indomethacin), daunorubicin, gentamicin, netilmicin, anthracycline)[18] are also capable of inhibiting prolidase in cultured human skin fibroblasts. Further studies are warranted to determine if doxorubicin or any of the above-mentioned agents can be useful to treat patients with excessive scarring.

Bleomycin

Bleomycin injections cause necrosis of keratinocytes with a mixed inflammatory infiltrate. Several studies have demonstrated that bleomycin can be used effectively to treat keloids and hypertrophic scars.

Bleomycin was given at a concentration of 1.5 IU/mL to 13 patients using the multiple-puncture method. Bleomycin was dripped onto the lesion, and then multiple punctures were made on the lesions using a syringe. Seven patients had complete flattening, 5 patients had highly significant flattening, and 1 patient had significant flattening. Likewise, Espana et al also reported complete flattening in 6 of 13 patients, highly significant flattening in 6 of 13 patients, and significant flattening in a single patient. Two patients presented a recurrence as a small nodule 10 and 12 months after the last infiltration.[19]

In another study of 31 keloids, patients were treated with 3-5 infiltrates of bleomycin within a 1-month period. Total regression occurred in 84% of the keloids, and both keloid volume and functional impairment were reduced.

Bodokh and Brun reported complete flattening in 69.4% of 36 patients with keloids and hypertrophic scars.[20] Saray et al obtained complete flattening in 73.3%, highly significant flattening in 6.7%, and moderate flattening in 6.7% of lesions after the administration of jet intralesional injections of bleomycin in 15 patients.[21]

In the only randomized clinical trial using the tattooing technique, with which smaller amounts of the drug are absorbed, thus minimizing systemic adverse effects, Naeini et al reported significantly better results with intralesional bleomycin compared with the control group (ie, combination of cryotherapy and TAC) in lesions larger than 100 mm2 (P = .03).[22] Local complications, such as hyperpigmentation, were observed in 75% of the patients.

Fifty patients with keloids and hypertrophic scars were treated with intralesional bleomycin. Three applications were given at 15-day intervals, and a fourth and final application was given 2 months after the third application. Complete flattening was observed in 44%, significant flattening in 22%, adequate flattening in 14%, and no flattening in 20%. Pruritus was relieved completely in 89% of patients.[23]

Verapamil

Verapamil is a calcium channel blocker that blocks the synthesis and secretion of extracellular matrix molecules (eg, collagen, GAGs, fibronectin) and increases fibrinase.

In a study of 22 patients with keloids, patients were treated with surgical excision and 5 treatments of verapamil at 2.5 mg/mL (varying doses from 0.5-5 mL, depending on keloid size) over a 2-month period and were evaluated at 2-year follow-up. Two patients had keloids that decreased in size from the original lesion, 2 patients had hypertrophic scars, 4 patients had pruritus, and 1 patient had a keloid on the donor site. The case series reported an average of 6.4 in patient satisfaction on a scale from 1 to 10.[24]

D’Andrea et al, from a case-control comparative study, reported resolution in 54% of the patients who had their keloids treated by a combination of surgical excision, silicon sheeting, and intralesional verapamil versus 18% in the control group without intralesional verapamil.[25] The recurrence rate was 36% in the active group after 18 months of follow up.

In a case series, Skaria reported complete resolution of 4 of 6 keloids and 1 of 2 hypertrophic scars at 1-year follow-up after surgical removal of the scar and further intralesional injection of verapamil at doses of 2.5 mg/mL.[26]

Lawrence reported 55% cured earlobe keloids in 52% of the patients after the combination of surgical excision, intralesional verapamil, and pressure earrings after an average of 28 months of follow-up.[27]

In a randomized clinical trial, Margaret Shanthi et al compared intralesional verapamil and intralesional TAC for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars, reporting a reduction in vascularity, pliability, height, and width in both groups after 3 weeks of treatment. This result was maintained at 1 year after stopping the treatment. Although the rate of improvement was faster in the TAC group, overall, no difference was noted between the 2 groups.[28]

Retinoic acid

Retinoic acid decreases normal tonofilament and keratohyalin synthesis, increases the production of mucoid substances and the epidermal cell growth rate, and inhibits DNA synthesis in vitro.

In a clinical trial involving 21 patients with 28 keloids and hypertrophic scars, topical retinoic acid was applied for at least 3 months twice daily and showed favorable results in 77-79% of the lesions. This includes a decrease in the size and symptoms of the scar.[29]

In addition, because retinoids affect collagen metabolism, another study involving 9 females and 2 males with keloids treated with 0.05% tretinoin topically for 12 weeks showed a significant decrease in weight (P < .04) and size (P < .01) of the keloids when comparing the status of the lesions at the beginning of the study and at week 12.[30]

In vitro studies have demonstrated that retinoids can modulate collagen production and the proliferation of normal and keloidal fibroblasts. In vivo applications of 0.05% topical retinoic acid can lead to a reduction of hypertrophic scars in 50-100% of patients and of keloids in less than 20% of patients. The most common adverse effects reported have been photosensitivity, irritant contact dermatitis, and skin atrophy.

Imiquimod

Imiquimod (1-[2-methylpropyl]-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amin) belongs to the family of imidazoquinolines. Imiquimod induces TNF-alpha, IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma, IL-1, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-12 and alters the expression of markers for apoptosis.

In one study, 13 keloids were treated with excision in combination with nightly applications of imiquimod 5% cream for 8 weeks. Ten patients with 11 keloids completed the 6-month study, and no keloids recurred after 6 months. Mild irritation was experienced with the application of imiquimod, and some patients needed a vacation period from the medication. Hyperpigmentation was experienced by more than half of the patients in the study.

In 2 different pilot studies, imiquimod 5% cream was applied on postshaved or totally excised earlobe keloids. It was demonstrated that the recurrence rate on postshaved keloids was 0% after 12 months of follow-up and 75% recurrence-free after 24 weeks of parallel keloid excision. Although the presence of local adverse events did not affect the treatment, a resting period was needed.[31, 32]

In a different study, 15 patients with hypertrophic scars 2 months after breast surgery were treated with either petrolatum or imiquimod 5% cream. At 24 weeks, almost all the scars treated with imiquimod scored better after assessment with standardized scales. The results demonstrated that imiquimod treatment improved scar quality and color match after surgery.

More recently, in study by Chuangsuwanich et al, 45 patients with excised keloids were treated with imiquimod 5% cream 2 weeks after the operation, on alternate nights, for 8 weeks.[33] After a follow-up period of 6-9 months, 10 of the keloids recurred (28.6% overall recurrence rate), with adverse effects found in 13 patients (37.1%). Interestingly, the keloids localized on the pinna had the lowest recurrence rate (2.9%) compared with those at the chest wall or neck (83.3% and 14.3%, respectively).

Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus is an immunomodulator that inhibits TNF-alpha. Gli -1, an oncogene, has been found to be overexpressed in fibroblasts of keloids. Inhibition of this oncogene may restore the natural apoptosis process and decrease proliferation of the ECM protein.[34] Rapamycin, a close analogue of tacrolimus, was used in an in vitro study and was found to inhibit the gli -1 oncogene, thus giving a rationale to initiate clinical trials of topical tacrolimus and rapamycin.

In an open-label pilot study, 11 patients used tacrolimus 0.1% ointment twice daily for 12 weeks on their keloids. Although the results were not statistically significant, the study showed a decrease in induration, tenderness, erythema, and pruritus for most patients.

Kim et al observed the resolution of a keloid in a patient during a course of topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis.[34]

Sirolimus

Sirolimus is an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a serine/threonine kinase that regulates collagen expression. By inhibiting mTOR, sirolimus blocks the response to IL-2 and decreases ECM deposition.[35] Similar to rapamycin, sirolimus inhibits Gli -1 signal transduction.

A higher concentration of VEGF and higher blood vessel density has been found in the basal layer of the epidermis of keloidal tissue in comparison to normal skin. In co-cultured keloid keratinocytes and fibroblasts exposed to sirolimus, VEGF expression has shown to be down-regulated in a dose-dependent manner. Through inhibition of VEGF, sirolimus may control the expression profile of underlying dermal fibroblasts.

Tamoxifen

Tamoxifen, a synthetic nonsteroidal antiestrogen used to treat breast cancer, has been shown to inhibit proliferation of keloid fibroblasts and their collagen synthesis in monolayer cultures. Hu et al demonstrated that tamoxifen exhibits a dose-dependent and reversible inhibition of contraction of adult human dermal fibroblast in vitro.[36]

Tamoxifen has also been shown to reduce TGF-alpha, and its isoform TGF-alpha1, production by keloid fibroblasts in vitro. Mikulec et al have shown that keloid fibroblasts have significantly lower TGF-alpha1 production when exposed to 16 µmol/L of tamoxifen at day 2 of culture when compared with control keloid fibroblasts (P = .05).[37]

Botulinum toxin A

Botulinum toxin A (BTA) is a neurotoxin that causes a flaccid paralysis of the local musculature and reduces skin tension. This reduction in the skin tensile force during the course of wound healing may represent a novel therapeutic target for treating keloids.

In an in vitro study, 64% of cultured fibroblasts were found to be in the G0-G1 phase of the cell cycle when exposed to BTA, while 35.4% were in the proliferative phases (ie, G2, M, S). In comparison, cultured fibroblasts that were not exposed to BTA had the following distribution: 36% (G0-G1) and 64% (proliferative phases).[38] The effect of BTA on the cell cycle distribution of fibroblasts may indicate that BTA can improve the eventual appearance of and inhibit the growth of hypertrophic scars and keloids.

In a prospective, uncontrolled study evaluating the effects of BTA in the treatment of keloids, 12 keloids were injected intralesionally at a concentration of 35 U/mL, with the total dose varying from 70-140 U per session. Injections were given at 3-month intervals for a maximum of 9 months. At 1-year of follow up, the therapeutic outcomes were excellent (n = 3), good (n = 5), and fair (n = 4), with no patients failing therapy or showing signs of recurrence.[39]

Nineteen patients with hypertrophic scars received intralesional injections of BTA (2.5 U/mL at 1-mo intervals) for 3 months. All patients showed acceptable improvement of the scars at 6 months of follow up. The erythema, pruritus, and pliability scores were significantly lower post-BTA injections compared with baseline.[40]

Intramuscular injections of BTA along with scar revision techniques on the face may help to reduce the development of a wider scar.[41]

Larger, randomized, controlled studies are warranted to determine the role of BTA in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.

TGF-beta and isomers

TGF-beta and its isomers have been shown to play a central role in fibrotic disorders characterized by excessive accumulation of interstitial matrix material in the lungs, kidneys, liver, and other organs. TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta2 have been shown to stimulate fibroblasts to produce collagen and have a direct and independent effect on the contraction of fibroblasts in vitro. However, TGF-beta3 may prevent scarring.

A study by Shah et al demonstrated that exogenous addition of TGF-beta3 reduces fibronectin and collagen types I and III deposition in the early stages of cutaneous rat wound healing and in overall wound scarring.[42]

A new antifibrotic product, avotermin (Juvista, Renovo; Manchester, United Kingdom), will be released in the future. Avotermin is derived from human recombinant TGF-beta3. This new medication has shown promise in a phase I trial and 2 phase II trials completed in the United Kingdom. In these studies, wounds treated with avotermin showed a statistically significant improvement in scar appearance, with a response rate of greater than 70%. After analyzing safety data on more than 1500 human subjects, avotermin does not seem to have safety or tolerability issues for use in the prevention or reduction of scarring.

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-patient, phase II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of 200 ng per 100 μL per linear cm of wound margin of avotermin when administered twice following scar revision surgery, the overall analysis showed that the primary endpoint (ie, photographic evaluation by a lay panel over a period from week 6 to month 7 postsurgery using a visual analogue scale) was met (P = .038). Investigator assessment at 7 months postsurgery using a visual analogue scale also obtained statistical significance (P = .036). Approximately 75% of the 7-month scars assessed from avotermin-treated wounds were considered to have a structure more like normal skin compared with the placebo in the histopathological analysis.[43]

Currently, several clinical trials are being conducted or are in development, including phase I, II, and III trials, to further investigate the efficacy and safety of avotermin for the treatment and prevention of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Results are expected from 2009 to 2012.[44, 45, 46, 47, 48]

Interleukins

ILs also regulate fibroblast differentiation and proliferation, and IL-10 has been shown to induce scarless healing when overexpressed in adult mouse wounds. Renovo (Manchester, United Kingdom) has developed Prevascar, a human recombinant IL-10 formulation. Preclinical experiments have demonstrated that application of Prevascar to the margins of acute incisional wounds by intradermal injection decreases subsequent scarring. In a phase II, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the antiscarring efficacy of varying doses of Prevascar in 175 subjects (1400 wounds), Renovo reported statistically significant efficacy data for the reduction of scarring in the skin.

Onion extract

Onion extract, that is, extract of Allium cepa, and specifically its derivative quercetin, is a bioflavonoid with antibacterial, fibrinolytic, antihistamine-releasing, and antiproliferative effects on both normal and malignant cells that can be found in onions and apples, red wine, and black tea.

Additional biological activities described include inhibition of the Na+ K+ ATPase, protein kinase C, tyrosine kinase, HIV reverse transcriptase, and pp60src kinase. It inhibits enzymes involved in the proliferation of signaling pathways (eg, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI-3K], 1-phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase), and it causes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. In vitro studies have demonstrated that quercetin inhibited keloid fibroblast proliferation, collagen synthesis, basal expression, and activation of several key proteins in the insulinlike growth factor (IGF)-I, which is a potent mitogen and inhibitor of apoptosis that stimulates fibroblast proliferation and enhances collagen synthesis.

Several prospective, randomized clinical trials have reported the efficacy of onion extract either for the prevention of keloid and hypertrophic scar development after surgery or for the management of these preexisting hyperplastic scars.

  • Chung et al reported no significant difference comparing onion extract with petrolatum, but none of the scars became keloidal or hypertrophic at least 11 months after the surgery.[49]
  • Draelos applied onion extract to postshaving wounds and reported significant differences in several parameters, including softness, redness, texture, and overall appearance compared with no treatment (P < .001).[50]
  • Ho et al treated wounds of patients who underwent laser removal of tattoos with a combination of 10% aqueous onion extract, 50 U heparin per gram of gel, and 1% allantoin, reporting that only 11.5% of wounds developed scarring, compared 23.5% in the control group (P < .05).[51]

For the treatment of preexisting scars, the combination of onion extract with other agents seems to generate better results than onion extract alone.

  • Koc et al reported that both a combination of onion extract and TAC and TAC alone significantly improved all parameters measured compared with baseline (P < .05, and P < .05 respectively); however, the combination was more effective than TAC for pain, sensitiveness, itching, and elevation.[52]
  • Hosnuter et al reported significant improvement of several clinical parameters with onion extract, including erythema (P < .05) and color of the scar (P < .01), compared with silicon sheet; however, a combination of onion extract and silicon sheet resulted in better results than with onion extract alone and silicon sheet alone.[53]
  • Comparing onion extract and a combination of 0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, and vitamin E versus placebo, Perez et al reported significant improvement in more parameters generated by the combination (7 of 12) than the onion extract (4 of 12) and placebo (2 of 12) compared with baseline. A trend towards greater satisfaction was reported by patients in the onion extract group compared with the combination group and both treatments compared with the placebo group.[54]

Combination of therapeutic agents

A combination of therapeutic agents, created in theory to obtain a beneficial synergistic effect in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars, has been developed that contains 0.5% hydrocortisone, 0.5% vitamin E, and 12% silicone. Each of the 3 components has been demonstrated, in varying degrees, to be effective for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.

Corticosteroids inhibit collagen synthesis, stimulate collagenase activity, enhance collagen degradation, decrease the proliferation of inflammatory mediators in wounds, decrease fibroblast proliferation, and decrease GAG synthesis. Silicone provides occlusion and hydration to the wound surface. Occlusion decreases collagen formation, mitogenic activity, and capillary formation. In addition, silicone induces a negative ionic charge at the wound surface, inhibiting collagen formation. Vitamin E has been postulated to inhibit collagen synthesis, stimulate collagenase expression, decrease fibroblast proliferation, and reduce inflammation in the wound.

In a preliminary in vitro study, Scarguard applied to a full-thickness epidermal model resulted in an increase in procollagenase levels and collagenase activity, suggesting its potential clinical use.[55]

Eisen applied Scarguard to surgical wounds in patients with a history of developing keloids and hypertrophic scars in an open-label, pilot study, reporting better results in 9 of 12 patients for redness and overall appearance and better results in 6 of 12 patients for texture of the scars compared with the untreated control.[56]

In a previously mentioned study (regarding onion extract) by Perez et al, Scarguard improved more clinical parameters than onion extract and placebo when used to treat keloids and hypertrophic scars in a randomized clinical trial.[54]

Vitamin E

Vitamin E (tocopherol) is a lipid-soluble antioxidant with multiple biological effects, including the reduction of reactive oxygen species, which hamper healing and cause damage to the DNA molecule, cellular membranes, and lipids. In addition, vitamin E (tocopherol) also alters collagen and GAG production and inhibits the spread of peroxidation of lipids in cellular membranes, thus acting as a membrane-stabilizing agent. Only anecdotal reports have shown that vitamin E speeds wound healing and improves the cosmetic appearance of scars.

When vitamin E has been used in combination with other treatments for scars, such as silicone gel sheets, it has been demonstrated in a prospective randomized clinical trial to improve preexisting hypertrophic scars by 50% in 95% of the patients, compared with 50% improvement in 75% of the patients treated with silicon sheets alone after 2 months of treatment (P < .05).[57] However, topical vitamin E has been consistently associated with the development of contact dermatitis.

In a prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial Baumann and Spencer applied a combination of Aquaphor with the content of 2 d-alpha-tocopherol oral vitamin supplement capsules, added at a concentration of 320 IU/g, versus Aquaphor alone to postsurgical wounds and reported no benefit to the cosmetic outcome of scars treated with vitamin E. In addition, in 90% of the cases, vitamin E had either no effect on, or worsened, the appearance of the scars.[58]

In a prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial Jenkins et al reported no beneficial effect of either vitamin E or topical steroids when both treatments were applied post grafting procedures for reconstruction for postburn contractures.[59]

Previous
Next

Radiation Therapy

Using radiotherapy to treat keloids remains controversial. Although many studies have demonstrated efficacy and decreased recurrence rates, the safety of radiotherapy has been questioned.

In a retrospective study of superficial x-ray therapy of 24 excised keloids, the author reported a recurrence rate of 53%. Use of iridium Ir 192 interstitial irradiation after excisional surgery resulted in a 21% recurrence rate after 1 year. Excisional surgery and preoperative hyaluronidase solution (150 U/mL sodium chloride) followed by external radiation (7.2-10.8 Gy) had a 0% recurrence rate. Adjunctive high dose-rate brachytherapy (192 Ir) used after excision and closure resulted in a 12% reoccurrence rate after 26 months.[60]

When excisional surgery is followed by postoperative radiation therapy, the total fractionated dose should be a minimum of 12 Gy, according to a comparative study showing a higher recurrence rate for patients treated with total doses less than 12 Gy.

Previous
Next

Other Potential Therapies

Additional potential therapeutic options for treating hypertrophic and keloidal scarring that have been shown in vitro to affect collagen synthesis include the use of proline-cis -hydroxyproline and azetidine carboxylic acid, tranilast (antiallergic drug shown to decrease collagen and GAG synthesis), and pentoxifylline (inhibits DNA replication). In addition, wounds treated with anti-TGF healed with minimal scar tissue formation and without affecting wound tensile strength. A possible candidate for affecting wounds via the neutralizing effect of TGF is the proteoglycan termed decorin.

Gentian violet

Gentian violet (GV) potentially may be useful. Multiple growth factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of keloids, including TGF-beta, IGF, and, most recently, the proangiogenic cytokine, VEGF.[61]

In a study by Gira et al, keloids were characterized as angiogenic lesions.[62] Endothelial cell–specific signaling via the Tie2 receptor by its ligand angiopoietin-2 (ang-2) is crucial for angiogenesis, according to Lobov et al.[63] They demonstrated that in the presence of VEGF-A, ang-2 promotes a rapid increase in capillary diameter, remodeling of the basal lamina, and proliferation and migration of endothelial cells and it stimulates sprouting of new blood vessels. Moreover, ang-2 promotes endothelial cell death and vessel regression if VEGF is inhibited.

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP) oxidase (Nox) genes have been linked to the angiogenic switch and regulate ang-2. Neutralization of ang-2 through Nox inhibition has been postulated as an effective therapy of hemangiomas of infancy.

GV, a triphenylmethane dye, has a chemical structure similar to diphenyl-iodonium (DIP), a specific Nox inhibitor. GV inhibits Nox2 and Nox4, expressed in endothelial cells. At high concentrations, GV effectively inhibited in vitro expression of ang-2 mRNA by 70-90%. In vivo, intralesional injections of GV into mice hemangiomas has resulted in a 92.6% decrease in tumor size and arrest of tumor progression compared with the control. No local or systemic toxicity was observed. Based on these results, GV may be considered in the future for the treatment of keloids, particularly if the keloids are definitively determined to be angiogenic lesions.

Vascular endothelial growth factor

VEGF promotes neovascularization and cell growth in both normal skin and scar tissue. It induces mitosis in endothelial cells, increases vascular permeability, and promotes deposition of extravascular fibrin matrix.[64] VEGF has been found to be overexpressed in the underlying dermis, epidermal keratinocytes, capillary lining cells, and fibroblasts of keloids in comparison with normal skin.[62, 65, 66, 67, 68] The use of short interfering RNA (siRNA) sequences has been shown to inhibit the expression of VEGF, representing a potential therapeutic strategy for keloids.[68]

Basic fibroblast growth factor

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) significantly inhibits the differentiation of mesodermal progenitor cells into myofibroblasts, which mediate tissue fibrosis and are primary producers of collagen.[69] bFGF has both mitotic and angiogenic properties, and it influences tissue remodeling, neovascularization, wound healing, and tumor growth. Rabbit-ear model studies have shown that through regulation of extracellular matrix production and degradation, bFGF accelerates wound healing and improves scar quality.[70]

In 230 sutured wounds, bFGF was administered one time locally during the immediate postoperative period. Patients received a low-dose intradermal injection (0.1 µg /cm wound), a high-dose intradermal injection (1 µg /cm wound), a rinse with high-dose bFGF (1 µg/cm wound), or no treatment (control group). At 6-12 months postsurgery, the minimum scarring ratios of the treated groups were statistically significant higher than the control group (P < .001, P < .0001, and P < .0001), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported.[71] These results suggest that bFGF may represent an important tool for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Further studies are warranted.

Hepatocyte growth factor

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is a cytokine that modifies the levels of other cytokines, including VEGF and TGF-beta1, promoting regeneration and angiogenesis, and decreasing apoptosis and fibrosis. It may contribute to the prevention of scar formation.[72]

Suppression of apoptosis and fibroblast proliferation was obtained after postincisional intradermal administration of the HGF gene in rats. Enhancement of the healing process and decreased scarring were also reported.[73] Further clinical trials evaluating HGF’s potential for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars are needed.

Mannose-6-phosphate

M6P was developed to compete with the latent form of TGF-beta1 (a M6P-containing molecule) for M6P receptors. These receptors are multifunctional transmembrane glycoproteins that are involved in the proteolytic activation of the latent precursor of TGF-beta.[74] By binding these receptors (and preventing TGF-beta1 from binding), M6P prevents further activation of TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta2, which may lead to the reduction of fibrosis.[75]

In a phase I dose-escalation study, both topically and intradermally injected M6P were found to be safe and well tolerated and to significantly accelerate epithelialization.[76] Current trials are further exploring the role of M6P in the acceleration of wound healing, at 2 dose levels and through 2 routes of administration (intradermal and topical).[77]

Prostaglandin E2

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is a major eicosanoid product of fibroblasts, synthesized from arachidonic acid by cyclooxygenases and PGE2 synthases. Although its up-regulation is related to increased fibrosis and scar formation, it has also been shown to decrease fibroblast proliferation, migration, and contraction and to reduce collagen levels by inhibiting its synthesis and promoting its degradation. Furthermore, keloid-derived fibroblasts have a diminished capacity to produce PGE2 and express less of the PGE2-specific receptor, E prostanoid receptor 2.[78] This suggests that PGE2 has a dual nature of profibrotic and antifibrotic action and that it is its deregulation that leads to abnormal scar formation.

Histamine H1 blockers

Histamine H1 blockers are anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative agents that suppress the release of TGF-beta1 from keloidal fibroblasts and inhibit collagen synthesis and deposition[79, 80, 81] In an in vitro study,[82] when exposed to histamine, 60% of cultured fibroblasts from normal human and keloidal skin showed elevated growth rates in a dose-dependent fashion. This rate was decreased in the presence of diphenhydramine hydrochloride in histamine-sensitive keloidal strains. After exposure to pheniramine maleate, fibroblasts cultured from abnormal scars showed a reduction in the proliferation rate (63%), in DNA synthesis (63%), and in the collagen synthesis rate (73%).[83] Antihistamines also have been shown to reduce the burning sensation, pain, and pruritus associated with keloids.[84, 85]

Pycnogenol

Pycnogenol, a pine bark extract from Pinus pinaster, is mainly composed by procyanidins (65-75%), including catechin and epicatechin, and other components such as flavonoid monomers and phenolic or cinnamic acids. It inhibits the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reduces inflammatory responses through inhibition of COX-2 and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) gene expression and phospholipase A2 (PLA2) activity. These effects are associated with a compensatory up-regulation of COX-1 gene expression. Pycnogenol has also been shown to inhibit matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)–1, MMP-2, and MMP-9.[86, 87, 88, 89]

Pycnogenol supplementation led to a 3-fold increase in PGE2 release from activated human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs).[90] It inhibits the nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB)–dependent gene expression and decreases the activity of proinflammatory mediators and adhesion molecules, including vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1).In LPS-stimulated monocytes, pycnogenol also inhibits NF-kappaB activation and decreases TNF-alpha secretion. It blocks activator protein-1 and inhibits the expression of proinflammatory cytokine IL-1.

Pycnogenol decreases the expression of mast cell–related tryptase and stem cell factor, which may decrease inflammation and fibrosis. Further studies are warranted to determine the role of pycnogenol for the treatment of keloids.[89, 90]

Mitomycin C

Mitomycin C is an antibiotic with antineoplastic and antiproliferative effects on fibroblasts.[91] It causes cross-linkage of DNA double-helix strands, leading to inhibition of DNA synthesis.[92] During 3 weeks following in vitro fibroblast exposure to mitomycin C, a decrease in fibroblast density and DNA synthesis was seen. Three weeks following removal of mitomycin C exposure, DNA synthesis recovered and the cell count increased.[93]

Topical mitomycin C 1 mg/mL was applied to wound beds for 3 minutes after keloid resection and then repeated after 3 weeks. Six months post treatment, 4 in 10 patients were pleased with the treatment outcome, 1 in 10 was disappointed, and approximately 80% were satisfied.[94]

In another study in which mitomycin 0.4 mg/5 mL was applied for 4 minutes in 10 patients following surgical excision of head and neck keloids, 9 in 10 patients had no recurrence after up to 14 months (mean, 8 mo).[92]

Eight patients were treated with keloid excision followed by application of mitomycin C for 5 minutes. At 14 months’ follow-up, 100% of patients were satisfied with the results and 2 patients experienced complete remission of their keloid.[95]

In a study using patients as their own controls,[96] in which topical mitomycin C was applied to excised keloids, no difference was seen in keloid recurrence.

No adverse events to the mitomycin C have been reported.

AZX100

AZX100 is a synthetic peptide with a similar intracellular mechanism of action to the heat shock–related protein 20 (HSP20), which is part of the signaling pathways that, upon activation, lead to muscle relaxation. AZX100 is able to bypass the HSP20 signaling pathway, causing relaxation, particularly in myofibroblasts from wounds.[97] In addition, AZX100 inhibits the production of connective-tissue growth factor (CTGF) by cultured fibroblasts exposed to TGF-beta1, resulting in excessive fibrosis.[98] It has been demonstrated to be safe and well tolerated in phase I studies. It has shown a significant pharmacological effect and a trend toward significant efficacy in the reduction of scars.[98] Ongoing phase II studies are evaluating the therapeutic effect of postexcisional intradermal application of AZX100 on keloids.[99, 100]

Previous
Next

Surgical Care

Surgical treatments include cryotherapy, excision, laser therapy, and other light therapies.

Previous
Next

Cryotherapy

Cryosurgical media (eg, liquid nitrogen) affects the microvasculature and causes cell damage via intracellular crystals, leading to tissue anoxia. Generally, 1, 2, or 3 freeze-thaw cycles lasting 10-30 seconds each are used for the desired effect. Treatment may need to be repeated every 20-30 days. Take care to administer liquid nitrogen in short application periods because of the possibility of reversible hypopigmentation. Cryotherapy can cause pain and permanent depigmentation in selected patients. As a single modality, cryosurgery led to total resolution with no recurrences in 51-74% of patients after 30 months of follow-up observation.

Previous
Next

Excision

Apply basic soft tissue handling techniques at primary wound repair sites. Carefully plan the closure with minimal tension, paralleling the relaxed skin tension lines. Use buried sutures, when necessary, for a layered closure and to reduce tension. Whenever feasible, apply pressure dressings and garments during the immediate postoperative period to wounds in patients in whom hypertrophic scars and keloid formation occur.

Decreased recurrence rates have been reported with excision in combination with other postoperative modalities, such as radiotherapy, injected IFN, or corticosteroid therapy. Excisional surgery alone has been shown to yield a 45-100% recurrence rate and should very rarely be used as a solitary modality, although excision in combination with adjunct measures can be curative. Most studies in which excisional surgery was combined with injected steroids reported a recurrence rate of less than 50%.

The authors have studied the effects of topically applied imiquimod 5% cream (Aldara) on the postexcision recurrence rates of 13 keloids excised surgically from 12 patients.[101, 102] Starting the night of surgery, imiquimod 5% cream was applied for 8 weeks. Patients were examined at weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 for local erythema, edema, erosions, pigment alteration, and/or recurrence of the keloid. Of the 11 keloids evaluated at 24 weeks, none (0%) recurred. The rate of hyperpigmentation was 63.6%. Two cases of mild irritation and superficial erosion cleared with temporary discontinuation of imiquimod. Both patients completed the 8 weeks of topical therapy and the final 24-week assessment. At 24 weeks, the recurrence rate of excised keloids treated with postoperative imiquimod 5% cream was lower than recurrence rates previously reported in the literature.

Previous
Next

Laser Therapy

Carbon dioxide, argon laser, and Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm)

Ablation of keloids and hypertrophic scars using a carbon dioxide laser (10,600 nm) can cut and cauterize the lesion, creating a dry surgical environment with minimal tissue trauma. When used as a single modality, the carbon dioxide laser was associated with recurrence rates of 39-92%, and when the carbon dioxide laser was combined with postoperative injected steroids, it was associated with recurrence rates of 25-74%.

Similarly to the carbon dioxide laser, the argon 488-nm laser can induce collagen shrinkage via generation of excessive localized heat. The argon laser has demonstrated recurrence rates of 45-93%.

The Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) has demonstrated recurrence rates of 53-100%.

Pulsed-dye laser (585 nm)

The 585-nm PDL provides photothermolysis, resulting in microvascular thrombosis. Beginning in the 1980s, authors noted that scars became less erythematous, more pliable, and less hypertrophic after treatment with the 585-nm PDL. The findings were later confirmed using objective measurements of erythema by reflectance spectrometry readings, scar height, and pliability measurements. Because of its efficacy, safety, and relatively low cost, the PDL remains the laser treatment of choice for hypertrophic scars. Multiple publications have continued to confirm the role of the 585-nm PDL for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.

In a randomized clinical trial, Manuskiatti et al treated 10 keloidal or hypertrophic median sternotomy scars with a 585-nm flashlamp-pumped PDL at fluences of 3, 5, and 7 J/cm2, and one segment was left untreated as a control.[13] They showed consistently better results in the treatment groups over the control. A trend was obtained towards lower fluences having more rapid onset of benefits and enhanced resolution of erythema, induration, and elevation of the scar. Multiple treatment sessions achieved greater clinical improvement.

Alster treated 44 bilateral, symmetric hypertrophic breast-reduction scars with a 585-nm PDL at 4.5-5.5 J/cm2 alone or in combination with intralesional TAC at 10-20 mg/mL injected immediately after the PDL irradiation.[103] All scars showed clinical improvement. The average pliability scores decreased by 50% after 2 sessions in both groups. The concomitant use of TAC reduced symptom scores by 70% compared with PDL alone (50%).

In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, Nouri et al treated 11 patients with 12 postoperative scars with 585-nm PDL at 3.5 J/cm2 versus no treatment.[104] The average overall improvement scores after one treatment was superior to the control (P = .0002). Vascularity improved 54% in treated halves, compared with 8% in controls. (P = .002). A total of 38% of halves returned to normal vascularity, compared with 0% in controls. Pliability improved 64% versus 1%, respectively (P = .002). A total of 62% of halves returned to normal pliability compared with 0% in control halves. The cosmetic appearance score was significantly better for the treated halves than for the untreated controls (7.3 vs 5.2; P = .016).

In contrast, Wittenberg et al found in a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled study an overall reduction in blood flow (P = .001), volume (P = .02), and pruritus (P = .005) over time after a follow-up period of 4 months after treatment discontinuation, but no differences were noted among treatment and control groups treating hypertrophic scars with a 585-nm flashlamp-pumped PDL at 6.5-8 J/cm2 or silicone gel sheeting, or no treatment.[105]

Pulsed-dye laser (595 nm)

Two studies have demonstrated that the 585-nm PDL has more effectively cleared port-wine stains than the 595-nm PDL at the same settings. Murine studies determined that the beneficial effect of lasers inhibiting the scar tissue growth decreased as the wavelength of the laser was increased from 585 to 600 nm. Further studies are necessary to obtain similar conclusions in human tissue. However, longer wavelength (eg, 595 nm) is an alternative vascular-specific laser for dark-skinned patients, with higher amounts of epidermal melanin, which absorbs more readily the 585-nm wavelength, causing nonspecific damage to pigmented epidermis. Currently, 595-nm PDL systems incorporate in the handpiece a cryogen-spray cooling device, which permits safe and effective treatment of hypertrophic scars by raising the threshold for epidermal damage, avoiding the resultant epidermal necrosis when the skin surface temperatures exceeds 70°C immediately after PDL exposure.

In a prospective randomized clinical trial, Conologue et al treated 16 patients with postoperative scars immediately after suture removal with a 595-nm cryogen-cooled PDL at 8 J/cm2 and showed significant improvement (60%) versus the untreated control (-3%) in the average sum of all clinical parameters measured.[106] Improvement was noted in vascularity (69%) versus the control (0%) (P = .53) and in pliability (67%) compared with the control (-8%) (P = .337).

In order to compare the 0.45-millisecond (short) pulse width with the 40-millisecond (long) pulse width, Manuskiatti et al treated 19 patients with keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars in a prospective randomized clinical trial, with a 595-nm PDL at 7 J/cm2 and a cryogen spray cooling device.[107] The short pulse width demonstrated greater overall improvement (P = .046) and scar pliability. Both pulse widths significantly reduced scar height compared with baseline; however, no differences were found between the groups. No effects were noted on scar erythema with either treatment. Both treatments were safe and effective in dark-skinned individuals.

Bellew et al randomly treated 15 hypertrophic scars with a 595-nm long-pulsed PDL at 7 J/cm2 with a concomitant skin-surface cooling device or with an IPL system with a 570-nm cut-off filter and a fluence of 40-45 J/cm2 and a triple pulse, reporting a mean improvement in the long-pulsed PDL group of 80% compared with 65% in the IPL group.[108] However, no statistical difference was noted between the 2 groups. Both systems are equally effective in improving the appearance of hypertrophic surgical scars. IPL minimizes the risk of purpura.

In contrast, however, Alam et al found no beneficial effect on clinical scar appearance at 6 weeks post treatment versus untreated control, after treating 20 patients with postoperative scars in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial using a 595-nm PDL at 7 J/cm2 and a 30-millisecond dynamic cooling spray.[109]

Previous
Next

New and Potential Light Therapies

Photodynamic therapy

Chiu et al studied the in vitro effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and 635-nm diode laser irradiation on keratinocyte-fibroblast co-culture (Raft model), determining that 5 J/cm2 reduces tissue contraction and collagen synthesis and preserves fibroblast viability.[110] The authors hypothesized that ALA-PDT may be used as an adjuvant therapy postsurgical excision of keloids.

Ultraviolet A-1

UVA-1 (340-400 nm) has been reported as an effective treatment for morphea and systemic sclerosis through induction of collagenase I (matrix metalloproteinase I) produced by fibroblasts. Asawanonda et al reported clinical improvement in one keloid in addition to the histological reappearance of normal-looking collagen and elastic fibers, while others have not reported as good clinical results.[111]

Animal models have shown a significant decrease in dermal thickness and collagen content in scars irradiated postsurgically with UVA-1 at 110 J/cm2. UVA-1 exposure to hypertropic scars in rabbits after epithelialization may lead to softening of the scar, thinning of the skin, and a decrease in collagen content. However, immediate irradiation with UVA-1 after wounding could not prevent the development of hypertrophic scarring in rabbits.[112]

Two German studies have evaluated the efficacy of UVA-1 irradiation for the treatment of skin conditions with altered dermal matrix, including keloids, scleroderma, scars, granuloma annulare, and acne keloidalis nuchae. The studies are complete, but results are not yet published.[113, 114]

Narrowband UVB

Narrowband UVB in the wavelength range of 310-315 nm (peak at 312 nm) has demonstrated for more than 20 years to be less potent than broadband UVB for erythema induction, hyperplasia, edema, sunburn cell formation, and Langerhans cell depletion from the skin. Studies on human skin fibroblasts by Choi et al have demonstrated that narrowband UVB reduces type I collagen synthesis by down-regulating TGF-beta1 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels and promoting the release of MMP-1.[115] Oiso et al reported flattening of a hypertrophic scar after treating a patient with vitiligo and a Koebner phenomenon with low-dose narrowband UVB (ie, 300 mJ/cm2) once a week for 4 months.[116]

Broadband UVB

Broadband UVB (290-320 nm) at high doses (up to 320 mJ/cm2) has also been theorized to improve fibrosing skin conditions, including keloids, hypertrophic scars, scleroderma, acne keloidalis nuchae, old burn scars, and granuloma annulare, among other related conditions with altered dermal matrix, safely through collagenase-mediated removal of excess dermal collagen via activation of MMP-1 pathways in patients with increased skin pigmentation. A phase I-II nonrandomized, open-label, uncontrolled, single-group assignment, safety-efficacy study is being conducted and is expected to finish by 2010, evaluating the use of UVB in these skin fibrosing conditions.[117]

Intense pulsed light

Bellew et al obtained equal effectiveness improving the appearance of hypertrophic surgical scars with IPL compared with 595-nm long-pulsed PDL.[108] IPL minimized the risk of developing postlaser purpura, frequently seen in patients treated with long-pulsed PDL.

Cartier reported that IPL was effective in treating and improving inflamed hypertrophic scars in 3 patients.[118]

Other studies have suggested that IPL is effective for improving the appearance of hypertrophic scars and keloids, regardless of their origin, and in reducing the height, redness, and hardness of scars. Erol et al evaluated hypertrophic scars in 109 patients (including keloids) after treatment using an IPL (Quantum) device, administered at 2- to 4-week intervals, with patients receiving an average of 8 treatments.[119] Overall clinical improvement was seen in the appearance of scars, and reductions in height, erythema, and hardness were seen in the majority of the patients (92.5%). Improvement was excellent in 31.2% of the patients, good in 25.7%, moderate in 34%, and minimal in 9.1%. Patient satisfaction was very high.

Previous
Proceed to Medication
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Brian Berman, MD, PhD  Professor, Departments of Dermatology and Internal Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine

Brian Berman, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology

Disclosure: Graceway Fee to Department Consulting; 3M Fee to Department Consulting; 3M Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Beilis Fee to Department Consulting; UCB Fee to Department Consulting; Shionogi None Consulting; Astellas Review panel membership; Warner-Chilcott Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Orthologic Fee to Department Consulting; Obagi Medical Fee to Department Consulting

Coauthor(s)

Whitney Valins  Clinical Research Fellow, Skin Research Group, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sadegh Amini, MD  Senior Clinical Research Fellow, Skin Research Group, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami

Sadegh Amini, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, International Society for Dermatologic Surgery, and International Society of Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Martha H Viera, MD  Senior Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami

Martha H Viera, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association and Women's Dermatologic Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Kathryn Schwarzenberger, MD  Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, University of Vermont College of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Division of Dermatology, Fletcher Allen Health Care

Kathryn Schwarzenberger, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Contact Dermatitis Society, American Dermatological Association, Dermatology Foundation, Medical Dermatology Society, and Women's Dermatologic Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Richard P Vinson, MD  Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Mountain View Dermatology, PA

Richard P Vinson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, Association of Military Dermatologists, Texas Dermatological Society, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John G Albertini, MD  Consulting Staff, Dermatologic Surgery, The Skin Surgery Center; Program Director, ACGME accredited Fellowship in Procedural Dermatology

John G Albertini, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Joel M Gelfand, MD, MSCE  Medical Director, Clinical Studies Unit, Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Associate Scholar, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania

Joel M Gelfand, MD, MSCE is a member of the following medical societies: Society for Investigative Dermatology

Disclosure: AMGEN Consulting fee Consulting; AMGEN Grant/research funds Investigator; Genentech Grant/research funds investigator; Centocor Consulting fee Consulting; Abbott Grant/research funds investigator; Abbott Consulting fee Consulting; Novartis investigator; Pfizer Grant/research funds investigator; Celgene Consulting fee DMC Chair; NIAMS and NHLBI Grant/research funds investigator

Chief Editor

Dirk M Elston, MD  Director, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center

Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Kischer CW, Brody GS. Structure of the collagen nodule from hypertrophic scars and keloids. Scan Electron Microsc. 1981;371-6. [Medline].

  2. Berman B, Flores F. Interferons. In: Wolverton SE, ed. Comprehensive Dermatologic Drug Therapy. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2001:339-57.

  3. Torkian BA, Yeh AT, Engel R, Sun CH, Tromberg BJ, Wong BJ. Modeling aberrant wound healing using tissue-engineered skin constructs and multiphoton microscopy. Arch Facial Plast Surg. May-Jun 2004;6(3):180-7. [Medline].

  4. Conejo-Mir JS, Corbi R, Linares M. Carbon dioxide laser ablation associated with interferon alfa-2b injections reduces the recurrence of keloids. J Am Acad Dermatol. Dec 1998;39(6):1039-40. [Medline].

  5. Lee JH, Kim SE, Lee AY. Effects of interferon-alpha2b on keloid treatment with triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injection. Int J Dermatol. Feb 2008;47(2):183-6. [Medline].

  6. Wittenberg GP, Fabian BG, Bogomilsky JL, et al. Prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled study to assess the efficacy of the 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser and silicone gel sheeting in hypertrophic scar treatment. Arch Dermatol. Sep 1999;135(9):1049-55. [Medline].

  7. al-Khawajah MM. Failure of interferon-alpha 2b in the treatment of mature keloids. Int J Dermatol. Jul 1996;35(7):515-7. [Medline].

  8. Davison SP, Mess S, Kauffman LC, Al-Attar A. Ineffective treatment of keloids with interferon alpha-2b. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2006;117(1):247-52. [Medline].

  9. Pittet B, Rubbia-Brandt L, Desmoulière A, et al. Effect of gamma-interferon on the clinical and biologic evolution of hypertrophic scars and Dupuytren's disease: an open pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1994;93(6):1224-35. [Medline].

  10. Kontochristopoulos G, Stefanaki C, Panagiotopoulos A, et al. Intralesional 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of keloids: an open clinical and histopathologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mar 2005;52(3 Pt 1):474-9. [Medline].

  11. Nanda S, Reddy BS. Intralesional 5-fluorouracil as a treatment modality of keloids. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2004;30(1):54-6; discussion 56-7. [Medline].

  12. Asilian A, Darougheh A, Shariati F. New combination of triamcinolone, 5-Fluorouracil, and pulsed-dye laser for treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars. Dermatol Surg. Jul 2006;32(7):907-15. [Medline].

  13. Manuskiatti W, Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP. Energy density and numbers of treatment affect response of keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars to the 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser. J Am Acad Dermatol. Oct 2001;45(4):557-65. [Medline].

  14. Goldan O, Weissman O, Regev E, Haik J, Winkler E. Treatment of postdermabrasion facial hypertrophic and keloid scars with intralesional 5-Fluorouracil injections. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar 2008;32(2):389-92. [Medline].

  15. Saray Y, Gulec AT. Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars with dermojet injections of bleomycin: a preliminary study. Int J Dermatol. Sep 2005;44(9):777-84. [Medline].

  16. Muszynska A, Palka J, Gorodkiewicz E. The mechanism of daunorubicin-induced inhibition of prolidase activity in human skin fibroblasts and its implication to impaired collagen biosynthesis. Exp Toxicol Pathol. May 2000;52(2):149-55. [Medline].

  17. Muszynska A, Palka J, Wolczynski S. Doxorubicin-induced inhibition of prolidase activity in human skin fibroblasts and its implication to impaired collagen biosynthesis. Pol J Pharmacol. Mar-Apr 1998;50(2):151-7. [Medline].

  18. Muszynska A, Wolczynski S, Palka J. The mechanism for anthracycline-induced inhibition of collagen biosynthesis. Eur J Pharmacol. Jan 5 2001;411(1-2):17-25. [Medline].

  19. Espana A, Solano T, Quintanilla E. Bleomycin in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars by multiple needle punctures. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2001;27(1):23-7. [Medline].

  20. Bodokh I, Brun P. [Treatment of keloid with intralesional bleomycin]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1996;123(12):791-4. [Medline].

  21. Sandulache VC, Parekh A, Li-Korotky H, Dohar JE, Hebda PA. Prostaglandin E2 inhibition of keloid fibroblast migration, contraction, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1-induced collagen synthesis. Wound Repair Regen. Jan-Feb 2007;15(1):122-33. [Medline].

  22. Naeini FF, Najafian J, Ahmadpour K. Bleomycin tattooing as a promising therapeutic modality in large keloids and hypertrophic scars. Dermatol Surg. Aug 2006;32(8):1023-9; discussion 1029-30. [Medline].

  23. Aggarwal H, Saxena A, Lubana PS, Mathur RK, Jain DK. Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars using bleom. J Cosmet Dermatol. Mar 2008;7(1):43-9. [Medline].

  24. Copcu E, Sivrioglu N, Oztan Y. Combination of surgery and intralesional verapamil injection in the treatment of the keloid. J Burn Care Rehabil. Jan-Feb 2004;25(1):1-7. [Medline].

  25. D'Andrea F, Brongo S, Ferraro G, Baroni A. Prevention and treatment of keloids with intralesional verapamil. Dermatology. 2002;204(1):60-2. [Medline].

  26. Shah M, Foreman DM, Ferguson MW. Neutralisation of TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 2 or exogenous addition of TGF-beta 3 to cutaneous rat wounds reduces scarring. J Cell Sci. Mar 1995;108 (Pt 3):985-1002. [Medline].

  27. Lawrence WT. Treatment of earlobe keloids with surgery plus adjuvant intralesional verapamil and pressure earrings. Ann Plast Surg. Aug 1996;37(2):167-9. [Medline].

  28. Margaret Shanthi FX, Ernest K, Dhanraj P. Comparison of intralesional verapamil with intralesional triamcinolone in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. Jul-Aug 2008;74(4):343-8. [Medline].

  29. Janssen de Limpens AM. The local treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids with topical retinoic acid. Br J Dermatol. Sep 1980;103(3):319-23. [Medline].

  30. Panabiere-Castaings MH. Retinoic acid in the treatment of keloids. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Nov 1988;14(11):1275-6. [Medline].

  31. Martin-Garcia RF, Busquets AC. Postsurgical use of imiquimod 5% cream in the prevention of earlobe keloid recurrences: results of an open-label, pilot study. Dermatol Surg. Nov 2005;31(11 Pt 1):1394-8. [Medline].

  32. Smith P, Mosiello G, Deluca L, Ko F, Maggi S, Robson MC. TGF-beta2 activates proliferative scar fibroblasts. J Surg Res. Apr 1999;82(2):319-23. [Medline].

  33. Chuangsuwanich A, Gunjittisomram S. The efficacy of 5% imiquimod cream in the prevention of recurrence of excised keloids. J Med Assoc Thai. Jul 2007;90(7):1363-7. [Medline].

  34. Kim A, DiCarlo J, Cohen C, et al. Are keloids really "gli-loids"?: High-level expression of gli-1 oncogene in keloids. J Am Acad Dermatol. Nov 2001;45(5):707-11. [Medline].

  35. Ong CT, Khoo YT, Mukhopadhyay A, et al. mTOR as a potential therapeutic target for treatment of keloids and excessive scars. Exp Dermatol. May 2007;16(5):394-404. [Medline].

  36. Hu D, Hughes MA, Cherry GW. Topical tamoxifen--a potential therapeutic regime in treating excessive dermal scarring?. Br J Plast Surg. Sep 1998;51(6):462-9. [Medline].

  37. Mikulec AA, Hanasono MM, Lum J, Kadleck JM, Kita M, Koch RJ. Effect of tamoxifen on transforming growth factor beta1 production by keloid and fetal fibroblasts. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Apr-Jun 2001;3(2):111-4. [Medline].

  38. Zhibo X, Miaobo Z. Botulinum toxin type A affects cell cycle distribution of fibroblasts derived from hypertrophic scar. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. Sep 2008;61(9):1128-9. [Medline].

  39. Zhibo X, Miaobo Z. Intralesional botulinum toxin type A injection as a new treatment measure for keloids. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 2009;124(5):275e-7e. [Medline].

  40. Xiao Z, Zhang F, Cui Z. Treatment of hypertrophic scars with intralesional botulinum toxin type A injections: a preliminary report. Aesthetic Plast Surg. May 2009;33(3):409-412. [Medline].

  41. Venus MR. Use of botulinum toxin type A to prevent widening of facial scars. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2007;119(1):423-4; author reply 424. [Medline].

  42. Saulis AS, Mogford JH, Mustoe TA. Effect of Mederma on hypertrophic scarring in the rabbit ear model. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2002;110(1):177-83; discussion 184-6. [Medline].

  43. McGrouther DA, et al. A Double Blind, Within Patient, Placebo Controlled Trial to Confirm the Efficacy of Juvista (Avotermin) in Conjunction With Scar Revision Surgery for the Improvement of Disfiguring Scars. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00742443. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00742443. Accessed November 3, 2008.

  44. Bush J, et al. A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Randomised Trial to Investigate the Scar Improvement Efficacy of a Single Intradermal Application of RN1001 (Avotermin) in Subjects Undergoing Excision of Benign Head and Neck Naevi. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00656227. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00656227. Accessed November 3, 2008.

  45. Bush J, et al. A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomised Dose Ranging Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Two Different Dosing Regimens of Avotermin (Juvista) in the Improvement of Scar Appearance When Applied to Approximated Wound Margins in Healthy Volunteers. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00629811. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00629811. Accessed November 3, 2008.

  46. Gilbert P, et al. A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Randomised Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Juvista (Avotermin) in the Improvement of Scar Appearance in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Reduction Mammaplasty. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00432328. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00432328. Accessed November 3, 2008.

  47. McCollum P, et al. A Dose Response Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Juvista (Avotermin) in the Improvement of Scar Appearance When Applied to Approximated Wound Margins Following Bilateral Varicose Vein Removal. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00430326. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00430326. Accessed November 3, 2008.

  48. McGrouther, DA et al. A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Randomised Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Juvista (Avotermin) in the Prevention or Improvement of Scar Appearance Following Scar Revision Surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00432211. Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00432211. Accessed November 3, 2008.

  49. Chung VQ, Kelley L, Marra D, Jiang SB. Onion extract gel versus petrolatum emollient on new surgical scars: prospective double-blinded study. Dermatol Surg. Feb 2006;32(2):193-7. [Medline].

  50. Draelos ZD. The ability of onion extract gel to improve the cosmetic appearance of postsurgical scars. J Cosmet Dermatol. Jun 2008;7(2):101-4. [Medline].

  51. Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan PC, Chan HH. Use of onion extract, heparin, allantoin gel in prevention of scarring in chinese patients having laser removal of tattoos: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Surg. Jul 2006;32(7):891-6. [Medline].

  52. Koc E, Arca E, Surucu B, Kurumlu Z. An open, randomized, controlled, comparative study of the combined effect of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onion extract gel and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide alone in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Dermatol Surg. Nov 2008;34(11):1507-14. [Medline].

  53. Hosnuter M, Payasli C, Isikdemir A, Tekerekoglu B. The effects of onion extract on hypertrophic and keloid scars. J Wound Care. Jun 2007;16(6):251-4. [Medline].

  54. Perez OA, Viera MH, Patel J, et al. A Prospective, Randomized, Invetigator-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Comparative Study Evaluating the Tolerability and Efficacy of Two Topical Therapies for the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars. (Unpublished data).

  55. Beckenstein MS, Kuniaki T, Matarasso A. The effect of Scarguard on collagenase levels using a full-thickness epidermal model. Aesthet Surg J. Nov-Dec 2004;24(6):542-6. [Medline].

  56. Eisen D. A pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of Scarguard in the prevention of scars. Internet J Dermatol. 2004;5(2).

  57. Palmieri B, Gozzi G, Palmieri G. Vitamin E added silicone gel sheets for treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Int J Dermatol. Jul 1995;34(7):506-9. [Medline].

  58. Baumann LS, Spencer J. The effects of topical vitamin E on the cosmetic appearance of scars. Dermatol Surg. Apr 1999;25(4):311-5. [Medline].

  59. Jenkins M, Alexander JW, MacMillan BG, Waymack JP, Kopcha R. Failure of topical steroids and vitamin E to reduce postoperative scar formation following reconstructive surgery. J Burn Care Rehabil. Jul-Aug 1986;7(4):309-12. [Medline].

  60. Garg MK, Weiss P, Sharma AK, et al. Adjuvant high dose rate brachytherapy (Ir-192) in the management of keloids which have recurred after surgical excision and external radiation. Radiother Oncol. Nov 2004;73(2):233-6. [Medline].

  61. Berman B, Viera MH, Amini S, Huo R, Jones IS. Prevention and management of hypertrophic scars and keloids after burns in children. J Craniofac Surg. Jul 2008;19(4):989-1006. [Medline].

  62. Gira AK, Brown LF, Washington CV, Cohen C, Arbiser JL. Keloids demonstrate high-level epidermal expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 2004;50(6):850-3. [Medline].

  63. Lobov IB, Brooks PC, Lang RA. Angiopoietin-2 displays VEGF-dependent modulation of capillary structure and endothelial cell survival in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug 20 2002;99(17):11205-10. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  64. Salem A, Assaf M, Helmy A, et al. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in keloids: a clinicopathologic study. Int J Dermatol. Oct 2009;48(10):1071-7. [Medline].

  65. Tiscornia G, Singer O, Ikawa M, Verma IM. A general method for gene knockdown in mice by using lentiviral vectors expressing small interfering RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb 18 2003;100(4):1844-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  66. Steinbrech DS, Mehrara BJ, Chau D, et al. Hypoxia upregulates VEGF production in keloid fibroblasts. Ann Plast Surg. May 1999;42(5):514-9; discussion 519-20. [Medline].

  67. Le AD, Zhang Q, Wu Y, et al. Elevated vascular endothelial growth factor in keloids: relevance to tissue fibrosis. Cells Tissues Organs. 2004;176(1-3):87-94. [Medline].

  68. Zhang GY, Yi CG, Li X, et al. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in keloid fibroblasts by vector-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor shRNA: a therapeutic potential strategy for keloid. Arch Dermatol Res. Apr 2008;300(4):177-84. [Medline].

  69. Tiede S, Ernst N, Bayat A, Paus R, Tronnier V, Zechel C. Basic fibroblast growth factor: a potential new therapeutic tool for the treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars. Ann Anat. Jan 2009;191(1):33-44. [Medline].

  70. Xie JL, Bian HN, Qi SH, et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) alleviates the scar of the rabbit ear model in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. Jul-Aug 2008;16(4):576-81. [Medline].

  71. Ono I, Akasaka Y, Kikuchi R, et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor reduces scar formation in acute incisional wounds. Wound Repair Regen. Sep-Oct 2007;15(5):617-23. [Medline].

  72. Naim R, Naumann A, Barnes J, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta1-antisense modulates the expression of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor in keloid fibroblast cell culture. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar 2008;32(2):346-52. [Medline].

  73. Ono I, Yamashita T, Hida T, et al. Local administration of hepatocyte growth factor gene enhances the regeneration of dermis in acute incisional wounds. J Surg Res. Jul 2004;120(1):47-55. [Medline].

  74. Ghosh P, Dahms NM, Kornfeld S. Mannose 6-phosphate receptors: new twists in the tale. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Mar 2003;4(3):202-12. [Medline].

  75. Viera MH, Amini S, Konda S, Berman B. Do postsurgical interventions optimize ultimate scar cosmesis. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. Jun 2009;144(3):243-57. [Medline].

  76. Juvidex. Products in Development. Available at www.renovo.com. Accessed March 15, 2010.

  77. A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Concentrations of Juvidex (Mannose-6-Phosphate) in Accelerating the Healing of Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites Using Different Dosing Regimes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00664352. clinicaltrials.gov. Available at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ NCT00664352. Accessed March 15, 2010.

  78. Hayashi T, Nishihira J, Koyama Y, Sasaki S, Yamamoto Y. Decreased prostaglandin E2 production by inflammatory cytokine and lower expression of EP2 receptor result in increased collagen synthesis in keloid fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol. May 2006;126(5):990-7. [Medline].

  79. Tanaka K, Honda M, Kuramochi T, Morioka S. Prominent inhibitory effects of tranilast on migration and proliferation of and collagen synthesis by vascular smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis. Jun 1994;107(2):179-85. [Medline].

  80. Miyazawa K, Hamano S, Ujiie A. Antiproliferative and c-myc mRNA suppressive effect of tranilast on newborn human vascular smooth muscle cells in culture. Br J Pharmacol. Jun 1996;118(4):915-22. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  81. Suzawa H, Kikuchi S, Arai N, Koda A. The mechanism involved in the inhibitory action of tranilast on collagen biosynthesis of keloid fibroblasts. Jpn J Pharmacol. Oct 1992;60(2):91-6. [Medline].

  82. Topol BM, Lewis VL Jr, Benveniste K. The use of antihistamine to retard the growth of fibroblasts derived from human skin, scar, and keloid. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1981;68(2):227-32. [Medline].

  83. Venugopal J, Ramakrishnan M, Habibullah CM, Babu M. The effect of the anti-allergic agent avil on abnormal scar fibroblasts. Burns. May 1999;25(3):223-8. [Medline].

  84. Shigeki S, Murakami T, Yata N, Ikuta Y. Treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars by iontophoretic transdermal delivery of tranilast. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. Jun 1997;31(2):151-8. [Medline].

  85. Yamada H, Tajima S, Nishikawa T, Murad S, Pinnell SR. Tranilast, a selective inhibitor of collagen synthesis in human skin fibroblasts. J Biochem. Oct 1994;116(4):892-7. [Medline].

  86. Schafer A, Chovanova Z, Muchova J, et al. Inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 activity by plasma of human volunteers after ingestion of French maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol). Biomed Pharmacother. Jan 2006;60(1):5-9. [Medline].

  87. Canali R, Comitato R, Schonlau F, Virgili F. The anti-inflammatory pharmacology of Pycnogenol in humans involves COX-2 and 5-LOX mRNA expression in leukocytes. Int Immunopharmacol. Sep 2009;9(10):1145-9. [Medline].

  88. Grimm T, Schafer A, Hogger P. Antioxidant activity and inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases by metabolites of maritime pine bark extract (pycnogenol). Free Radic Biol Med. Mar 15 2004;36(6):811-22. [Medline].

  89. Grimm T, Chovanova Z, Muchova J, et al. Inhibition of NF-kappaB activation and MMP-9 secretion by plasma of human volunteers after ingestion of maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol). J Inflamm (Lond). Jan 2006;3:1. [Medline].

  90. Matsumori A. Treatment options in myocarditis: what we know from experimental data and how it translates to clinical trials. Herz. Sep 2007;32(6):452-6. [Medline].

  91. Lee DA. Antifibrosis agents and glaucoma surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Oct 1994;35(11):3789-91. [Medline].

  92. Stewart CE 4th, Kim JY. Application of mitomycin-C for head and neck keloids. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Dec 2006;135(6):946-50. [Medline].

  93. Simman R, Alani H, Williams F. Effect of mitomycin C on keloid fibroblasts: an in vitro study. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:71-76. [Medline].

  94. Bailey JN, Waite AE, Clayton WJ, Rustin MH. Application of topical mitomycin C to the base of shave-removed keloid scars to prevent their recurrence. Br J Dermatol. Apr 2007;156(4):682-6. [Medline].

  95. Talmi YP, Orenstein A, Wolf M, Kronenberg J. Use of mitomycin C for treatment of keloid: a preliminary report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Apr 2005;132(4):598-601. [Medline].

  96. Sanders KW, Gage-White L, Stucker FJ. Topical mitomycin C in the prevention of keloid scar recurrence. Arch Facial Plast Surg. May-Jun 2005;7(3):172-5. [Medline].

  97. AZX100 Mode of Action. Available at http://www.capstonethx.com/researchdevelopment/AZX100modeofaction.php. Accessed MARch 15, 2010.

  98. Parish JL, Rhouth HB, Parish LC. Keloids: Innovative Therapy. Poster P3513 presented a the 68th Annual Meeting of American Academy of Dermatology. March 5-9, 2010, Miami, FL. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mar 2010;62(3 Supp):AB147.

  99. 101. A Pilot Phase 2a Blinded, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Parallel Group, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of AZX100 Drug Product Following Excision of Keloids. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00825916. clinicaltrials.gov. Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00825916. Accessed March 15, 2010.

  100. 102. A Pilot Phase 2a Blinded, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Parallel Group, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Additional Doses of AZX100 Drug Product Following Excision of Keloids. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00892723. clinicaltrials.gov. Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00892723.. Accessed March 15, 2010.

  101. Berman B, Frankel S, Villa AM, Ramirez CC, Poochareon V, Nouri K. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, prospective study evaluating the tolerability and effectiveness of imiquimod applied to postsurgical excisions on scar cosmesis. Dermatol Surg. Nov 2005;31(11 Pt 1):1399-403. [Medline].

  102. Berman B, Kaufman J. Pilot study of the effect of postoperative imiquimod 5% cream on the recurrence rate of excised keloids. J Am Acad Dermatol. Oct 2002;47(4 Suppl):S209-11. [Medline].

  103. Alster T. Laser scar revision: comparison study of 585-nm pulsed dye laser with and without intralesional corticosteroids. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2003;29(1):25-9. [Medline].

  104. Nouri K, Jimenez GP, Harrison-Balestra C, Elgart GW. 585-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of surgical scars starting on the suture removal day. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2003;29(1):65-73; discussion 73. [Medline].

  105. Wilgus TA, Bergdall VK, Tober KL, et al. The impact of cyclooxygenase-2 mediated inflammation on scarless fetal wound healing. Am J Pathol. Sep 2004;165(3):753-61. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  106. Conologue TD, Norwood C. Treatment of surgical scars with the cryogen-cooled 595 nm pulsed dye laser starting on the day of suture removal. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2006;32(1):13-20. [Medline].

  107. Manuskiatti W, Wanitphakdeedecha R, Fitzpatrick RE. Effect of pulse width of a 595-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser on the treatment response of keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars. Dermatol Surg. Feb 2007;33(2):152-61. [Medline].

  108. Bellew SG, Weiss MA, Weiss RA. Comparison of intense pulsed light to 595-nm long-pulsed pulsed dye laser for treatment of hypertrophic surgical scars: a pilot study. J Drugs Dermatol. Jul-Aug 2005;4(4):448-52. [Medline].

  109. Alam M, Pon K, Van Laborde S, Kaminer MS, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Clinical effect of a single pulsed dye laser treatment of fresh surgical scars: randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2006;32(1):21-5. [Medline].

  110. Chiu LL, Sun CH, Yeh AT, et al. Photodynamic therapy on keloid fibroblasts in tissue-engineered keratinocyte-fibroblast co-culture. Lasers Surg Med. Sep 2005;37(3):231-44. [Medline].

  111. Asawanonda P, Khoo LS, Fitzpatrick TB, Taylor CR. UV-A1 for keloid. Arch Dermatol. Mar 1999;135(3):348-9. [Medline].

  112. Sasaki T, Holeyfield KC, Uitto J. Doxorubicin-induced inhibition of prolyl hydroxylation during collagen biosynthesis in human skin fibroblast cultures. Relevance to imparied wound healing. J Clin Invest. Dec 1987;80(6):1735-41. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  113. Kang S, et al. The Effectiveness Of UVA1 Irradiation In The Treatment Of Skin Conditions With Altered Dermal Matrix: A Controlled, Cross-Over Study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00476801. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00476801. Accessed November 1, 2008.

  114. Kang S, et al. The Effectiveness of UVA1 Irradiation in the Treatment of Skin Conditions With Altered Dermal Matrix: An Open Pilot Study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00476697. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00476697. Accessed November 1, 2008.

  115. Choi CP, Kim YI, Lee JW, Lee MH. The effect of narrowband ultraviolet B on the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1, transforming growth factor-beta1 and type I collagen in human skin fibroblasts. Clin Exp Dermatol. Mar 2007;32(2):180-5. [Medline].

  116. Oiso N, Kawara S, Kawada A. The effectiveness of narrowband ultraviolet B on hypertrophic scar in a patient having an isomorphic phenomenon and vitiligo. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. May 15 2008;[Medline].

  117. Varga J, Diaz-Perez A, Rosenbloom J, Jimenez SA. PGE2 causes a coordinate decrease in the steady state levels of fibronectin and types I and III procollagen mRNAs in normal human dermal fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Sep 30 1987;147(3):1282-8. [Medline].

  118. Cartier H. Use of intense pulsed light in the treatment of scars. J Cosmet Dermatol. Jan 2005;4(1):34-40. [Medline].

  119. Erol OO, Gurlek A, Agaoglu G, Topcuoglu E, Oz H. Treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids using intense pulsed light (IPL). Aesthetic Plast Surg. Nov 2008;32(6):902-9. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Clawlike outline of a keloid. Courtesy of Dirk M. Elston, MD.
Keloid. Courtesy of Dirk M. Elston, MD.
Keloid. Courtesy of Dirk M. Elston, MD.
Keloid. Courtesy of Dirk M. Elston, MD.
Histology of keloid demonstrating central zone of hyalinized collagen (hematoxylin and eosin stain). Courtesy of Dirk M. Elston, MD.
Histology of keloid demonstrating thick hyalinized collagen bundles (hematoxylin and eosin stain). Courtesy of Dirk M. Elston, MD.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.