eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Bullous Diseases
Drug-Induced Bullous Disorders
Updated: Jan 6, 2009
Introduction
Background
Bullous or blistering drug eruptions and drug-induced anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity syndromes are among the most serious types of adverse drug reactions. Based on the various mechanisms, bullous drug eruptions may be classified into the following categories:
- Spongiotic or eczematous
- Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis
- Fixed drug eruption
- Erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or toxic epidermal necrolysis
- Drug-induced pemphigus
- Drug-induced pemphigoid
- Drug-induced linear immunoglobulin A (IgA) dermatosis
- Pseudoporphyria cutanea tarda
Pathophysiology
As with other bullous disorders, drug-induced blistering reactions occur via a variety of pathophysiological mechanisms and at various levels within the epidermis/dermoepidermal junction. Examples of these mechanisms include the following: exocytosis/spongiosis, formation of subcorneal spongiform pustules, cytolysis and keratinocytic necrosis, antiepidermal antibody formation, deposition of immunoglobulin at the basement membrane zone, and photo-induced collagen alterations that lead to a mechanobullous disorder. Most bullous drug reactions are the result of an immunologically mediated inflammatory response, although pseudoporphyria cutanea tarda (pseudo-PCT) is not associated with significant inflammation. Studies have reported the preferential activation of drug-specific CD8+ T cells in the pathophysiology of some bullous drug eruptions.
Frequency
United States
Overall incidence of adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs has been estimated at 0.1-2.2% of treatment courses; however, semisynthetic penicillins and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim may have a considerably higher incidence at 3-5% of treatment courses. Patients infected with HIV may be at greater risk for adverse cutaneous drug reactions. Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) have an incidence ranging from 1.8-9 cases per million and are more frequent in those younger than 20 years and older than 65 years.
International
The United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy have reported similar incidences of drug reactions and TEN as the United States. However, one survey in the United Kingdom found that only 2-10% of serious reactions are reported.
Mortality/Morbidity
Most bullous drug eruptions resolve without significant sequelae once the offending drug is removed. However, the morbidity of these reactions is proportional to the extent of skin surface area and mucous membrane involvement. Of patients who develop TEN, 25-30% die. Elderly patients have a higher mortality rate with TEN. Sepsis is the most common cause of death in TEN. SJS and TEN may result in a residual cutaneous pigmentary disorder and possible scarring of the ocular mucosa in those who survive.
Race
Bullous drug reactions have no racial predilections.
Sex
In general, adverse drug reactions occur more commonly in women, although erythema multiforme (EM) has been reported to occur more frequently in men.
Age
Elderly patients who take multiple medications are at higher risk for the development of adverse drug reactions. Young men seem to be at higher risk for EM.
Clinical
History
Symptomatology of cutaneous reactions varies depending upon type and extent of skin involvement.
- Eczematous or spongiotic drug reactions may be the result of previous contact sensitization to the drug or may occur de novo.
- Incidence of contact eczematous reactions to topical medications may be as high as 12.1%. Systemic contact eczematous reactions, which result from systemic exposure (eg, oral, parenteral, rectal, intravenous, inhalation) to a previous contact sensitized drug, are less common.
- Eczematous drug reactions begin with diffuse pruritus but may also cause headache, malaise, fever, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
- Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) (toxic pustuloderma) is a result of a systemic medication in 90% of cases.
- Onset is abrupt, usually 1-5 days after starting the medication.
- Patients report a diffuse pruritic or burning painful eruption associated with fever, malaise, and sometimes prostration. Seventeen percent of patients have a history of psoriasis.
- Fixed drug eruptions (FDEs) are a common cause of all drug eruptions, and their frequency is second only to urticaria/angioedema.
- Careful patient assessment usually reveals that an FDE develops 6-48 hours after administration of the causative drug.
- Symptoms of pruritus and burning accompanied by fever are not uncommon. In those patients with multiple episodes of FDE, reports of increasing hyperpigmentation at the site of a previous lesion are common.
- Nosology of EM is controversial and somewhat confusing. Historically, EM has been divided into 3 groups: EM minor, EM major or SJS, and TEN. Considerable overlap may exist between these 3 subgroups, and some authorities believe that TEN should be considered a distinct entity. An infectious agent, such as herpes simplex or mycoplasma, usually causes less extensive involvement of EM; drugs are implicated less often in EM minor. However, drugs cause most of the more severe and diffuse forms of EM.
- EM minor may begin with prodromal symptoms suggestive of an upper respiratory infection (eg, coryza, cough, pharyngitis), but within 7-10 days skin lesions begin to develop acrally and symmetrically on the hands, feet, and distal extremities. EM minor may have involvement of the oral mucosa, but involvement of 2 or more mucosal surfaces usually indicates SJS or TEN.
- EM major (SJS) affects young adult males more frequently. Prodromal symptoms of high fever, asthenia, muscular pains, diarrhea, vomiting, arthralgias, and pharyngitis precede mucosal involvement of 2 or more mucosal sites by several days. Skin involvement rapidly ensues. TEN has similar symptomatology but also demonstrates diffuse skin tenderness that resembles severe sunburn.
- Drug-induced pemphigus can develop days, weeks, or months after taking the offending agent.
- Ruptured bullae leave painful erosions. Itching is not a common symptom. The oral mucosa is frequently involved; hoarseness, dysphagia, and unpleasant mouth odor follow.
- Drugs may serve as either a cause or a trigger for pemphigus. In those patients in whom drugs serve as a trigger, other autoimmune disorders such as lupus, bullous pemphigoid, and myasthenia gravis may already be present. Therefore, the development of drug-induced pemphigus seems to be determined in part by genetic predisposition.
- Drug-induced pemphigoid may follow oral or topical administration of drugs.
- Itching is a common symptom. Involvement of the epiglottis may lead to acute airway obstruction.
- Patients with drug-induced pemphigoid are commonly younger than patients with idiopathic pemphigoid. Cicatricial pemphigoid is more common in patients of late middle age.
- Drug-induced linear IgA dermatosis (LAD) comprises a small portion of all cases of LAD.
- The clinical presentation of drug-induced LAD is indiscernible from other causes of LAD, except that mucosal involvement may be less likely in drug-induced LAD.
- Drug-induced LAD usually develops 1-2 weeks after taking the offending agent, although reactions may develop much sooner.
- Patients who develop LAD usually are seriously ill. Symptoms of severe burning and pruritus are common.
- Porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT) may be precipitated or exacerbated by estrogens, iron overload, environmental hepatotoxins, and several drugs, but patients who have drug-induced pseudoporphyria have no underlying abnormality of heme biosynthesis. The symptoms of photosensitivity, skin fragility, and blistering of the hands and forearms are the same in both conditions.
Physical
The physical findings of bullous drug eruptions vary greatly depending on the type of reaction.
- On physical examination, the features of an eczematous drug eruption are similar to that of a diffuse contact dermatitis.
- These features include diffuse patches of erythema, microvesiculation, vesicles, crusts, and oozing.
- Other more specific features may include dyshidrotic hand dermatitis, EM-like lesions, purpura, urticarial lesions, and vasculitislike lesions.
- Recrudescence of a positive patch test reaction may occur after systemic exposure to the offending medication. A diffuse eczematous eruption may mimic severe atopic dermatitis.
- Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis
- AGEP manifests as a diffuse scarlatiniform rash that rapidly develops numerous (>100) small pustules.
- Pustules measure 1-5 mm (see Media File 1).
- Nikolsky sign may be positive.
- Some pustules may coalesce into bullae.
- Facial swelling, purpura, and targetoid lesions may occur.
- Oral mucosa may be involved in about 20% of cases. Once the offending drug is discontinued, the eruption rapidly dries up and desquamates within 2 weeks.
- Fixed drug eruption
- FDEs start as a few sharply demarcated erythematous macules that rapidly become erythematous plaques occurring more commonly on the lips, genitalia, and trunk.
- Lesions heal with hyperpigmentation and occur in the same site with readministration of the responsible drug (see Media File 2).
- In 30% of cases, macules may become vesicles and bullae, which may lead to a more severe reaction known as generalized bullous FDE resembling SJS-TEN. In patients with generalized bullous FDE, physical examination reveals clearly demarcated erythematous and edematous patches surrounded by bullae that contain clear fluid.
- The characteristic physical finding of EM is the target or iris lesion (see Media File 3).
- These lesions begin as sharply marginated erythematous annular macules or patches that become slightly raised.
- A concentric color change takes place; the center of the lesion becomes darker, dusky, or more violaceous, and the periphery develops a ring of erythema. The classic iris lesion has 3 zones, a central dusky area with purpura and an edematous pale ring surrounded by an erythematous ring. The central dusky macule may actually form a tense vesicle or bulla.
- These typical iris or target lesions are more commonly observed in EM minor caused by infections and occur acrally and progress in a centripetal fashion.
- Larger, confluent, irregularly shaped, coalescing lesions with involvement of the trunk and 2 or more mucosal sites are common with SJS (see Media Files 4-5). The mouth and lips are the most commonly affected mucosal site in SJS, but other sites such as the pharynx, larynx, esophagus, bronchi, and genital mucosa may be involved.
- TEN demonstrates diffuse sunburnlike erythema that often begins on the face and spreads downward. The hairy scalp is spared. Maximal extension occurs within 2-3 days. A characteristic feature of TEN is the sheetlike separation of the epidermis in the involved areas. Flaccid bullae may form. Nikolsky sign is positive. Two or more mucosal sites are involved in 85-95% of patients with TEN.
- Drug-induced pemphigus may be clinically indistinguishable from idiopathic pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigus foliaceus (see Media File 6).
- Lesions are superficial flaccid bullae ranging in size from 1-10 cm.
- They may initially occur in the mouth.
- Nikolsky sign is positive when pressure is applied lateral to the bulla.
- Lesions rupture easily, leaving denuded and weeping areas, which secondarily become crusted.
- Tense bullae on normal skin or on an erythematous base is the typical finding in drug-induced pemphigoid (see Media File 7).
- Denuded areas, which are left after bullae rupture, heal spontaneously.
- Erythematous patches, urticarial plaques, and targetoid lesions may also be observed. Lesions may be found on the face, trunk, limbs, palms, soles, and mucous membranes.
- Nikolsky sign may be positive, unlike in idiopathic pemphigoid.
- Cicatricial pemphigoid is distinguished from other forms of pemphigoid by the presence of scarring. Cicatricial pemphigoid occurs on the mucous membranes of the eyes, pharynx, genitalia, or anus. Adhesions, strictures, and the loss of function may result from the scarring process.
- Physical examination of a drug-induced LAD lesion may reveal one of several pictures.
- The most common presentations include urticated plaques, papulovesicles resembling dermatitis herpetiformis, targetoid lesions as in EM, and bullae resembling those found in bullous pemphigoid (see Media File 8).
- Bullous eruptions can become hemorrhagic.
- Lesions are most commonly located on the trunk and limbs.
- Cases of palmar lesions, although uncommon, have been reported.
- Pseudoporphyria demonstrates tense blisters, erosions, and milia especially on the dorsum of the hands and forearms (see Media File 9). Features of hypertrichosis, dyspigmentation, and skin sclerosis are not observed in pseudoporphyria as they are in true porphyria.
Causes
- Contact sensitization to certain topical medications may result in a predisposition to a systemic eczematous reaction to the same or a chemically related medication.
- Contact sensitivity to penicillin may cause a diffuse eczematous reaction to systemically administered penicillin or even the small amounts of penicillin in cow's milk taken orally.
- Contact sensitivity to topical sulfonamides may cause a reaction to systemically administered sulfamethoxazole or sulfonylureas (ie, tolbutamide, carbutamide) but not to dapsone or sulfapyridine.
- Contact sensitivity to ethylenediamine found as a preservative in some topical medications may predispose an individual to a reaction to systemically administered aminophylline, theophylline, tripelennamine, antazoline, methapyrilene, hydroxyzine, and pyrilamine.
- Contact sensitivity to tetramethylthiuram disulfide predisposes a person to a reaction to the antialcohol treatment Antabuse (tetraethylthiuram disulfide).
- Patients sensitized to paraphenylenediamine may react to azo dyes taken orally or the group of para drugs.
- Other drugs that may cause an eczematous eruption but are not preceded by contact sensitivity are the following: carbamazepine, gold, griseofulvin, phenytoin, piroxicam, thiazide diuretics, and vitamin K.
- The drugs most commonly implicated in causing AGEP are antibiotics, especially beta-lactams, macrolides, and cotrimoxazole. Ciprofloxacin has been reported in induce a bullous form of AGEP.1 Furosemide and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents have also been reported to be associated with the development of AGEP.2
- Diltiazem has been reported to cause AGEP several times.
- Other causes include the following: carbamazepine, hydroxychloroquine, clindamycin, ticlopidine, terbinafine, high-dose chemotherapy, chromium picolinate, chloramphenicol, sulfapyridine, metronidazole, lacquer chicken, protease inhibitors, progesterones, mercury, nystatin, amoxapine, paracetamol, chloroquine and proguanil, nifuroxazide, lansoprazole, minocycline, dexamethasone injection, propicillin, aspirin, doxycycline, furosemide, and buphenine.
- Many drugs are capable of causing FDEs. Some of the more common etiologic agents of FDEs include aspirin, barbiturates, cotrimoxazole, phenolphthalein, feprazone, sulfonamides, and tetracycline.
- Causative agents in generalized bullous FDEs include aminophenazone, antipyrine, barbiturates, co-trimoxazole, diazepam, mefenamic acid, paracetamol, phenazones, phenylbutazone, piroxicam, sulfadiazine, and sulfathiazole.
- Knowledge of the potential drugs involved in a FDE is especially important because certain drugs have a predilection to cause FDEs at certain sites. Aspirin has a predilection for the trunk and limbs, tetracyclines for the genitalia, and phenylbutazone for the lips.
- No reproducible tests for the etiology of EM exist. Association with infectious agents, such as herpes simplex and mycoplasma, has been well described. Precipitation of SJS or TEN has most commonly been associated with certain medications. The most commonly associated medications are the following: antibiotics (eg, sulfonamides, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, penicillins, cephalosporins, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, griseofulvin, rifampin, streptomycin, tetracycline, clarithromycin,3 ciprofloxacin4 ), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (eg, ibuprofen, acetylsalicylic acid, ketotifen, naproxen,5,6 piroxicam, sulindac), antihypertensives, anticonvulsants (eg, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, phenytoin), and allopurinol. More recently, COX-2 inhibitors have been reported to be associated with SJS.7
- Topical mechlorethamine reportedly caused a subepidermal bullous reaction in a patient with mycosis fungoides.
- Methotrexate has been reported to be associated with bullous acral erythema in a child.8
- The thiol group of drugs is the most common agent implicated in drug-induced pemphigus. Drugs known to cause pemphigus include amoxicillin, ampicillin, captopril,9,10 cephalosporins, penicillamine, penicillin, pyritinol, and rifampin. Thiol drugs are more likely to cause pemphigus whereas nonthiol drugs are more likely to trigger pemphigus. For this reason, spontaneous recovery is lower in non–thiol-induced pemphigus where other factors may be predisposing a patient to develop pemphigus. Captopril has been reported to cause lichen planus pemphigoides.11
- Sulfur-containing drugs commonly cause drug-induced pemphigoid, with furosemide being the most common cause. Other agents commonly known to cause drug-induced pemphigoid include amoxicillin, ampicillin, phenacetin, penicillin, penicillamine, psoralen-ultraviolet-A light, and beta-blockers.12 Cicatricial pemphigoid has occurred after the use of drugs including practolol, topical echothiophate, D-penicillamine, clonidine, topical pilocarpine, topical demecarium, indomethacin, topical glaucoma, and sulfadoxine. Oral terbinafine has been associated with the development of bullous pemphigoid.13
- Vancomycin is the most common cause of drug-induced LAD.14,15,16 Other drugs known to cause LAD include diclofenac, somatostatin, lithium, phenytoin, captopril, amiodarone, cefamandole, amoxicillin,17 and ampicillin-sulbactam.18
- True PCT may be precipitated by barbiturates, estrogens, griseofulvin, rifampicin, and sulfonamides. The drugs that are known to induce pseudoporphyria include furosemide, nabumetone, nalidixic acid, naproxen, oxaprozin, tetracycline, and voriconazole.19
More on Drug-Induced Bullous Disorders |
Overview: Drug-Induced Bullous Disorders |
| Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Drug-Induced Bullous Disorders |
| Treatment & Medication: Drug-Induced Bullous Disorders |
| Follow-up: Drug-Induced Bullous Disorders |
| Multimedia: Drug-Induced Bullous Disorders |
| References |
| Next Page » |
References
Hausermann P, Scherer K, Weber M, Bircher AJ. Ciprofloxacin-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis mimicking bullous drug eruption confirmed by a positive patch test. Dermatology. 2005;211(3):277-80. [Medline].
Noce R, Paredes BE, Pichler WJ, Krähenbühl S. Acute generalized exanthematic pustulosis (AGEP) in a patient treated with furosemide. Am J Med Sci. Nov 2000;320(5):331-3. [Medline].
Khaldi N, Miras A, Gromb S. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and clarithromycin. Can J Clin Pharmacol. Fall 2005;12(3):e264-8. [Medline].
Jongen-Lavrencic M, Schneeberger PM, van der Hoeven JG. Ciprofloxacin-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Infection. Dec 2003;31(6):428-9. [Medline].
Dyson SW, Lin C, Jaworsky C. Enoxaparin sodium-induced bullous pemphigoid-like eruption: a report of 2 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jul 2004;51(1):141-2. [Medline].
Leivo T, Heikkilä H. Naproxen-induced generalized bullous fixed drug eruption. Br J Dermatol. Jul 2004;151(1):232. [Medline].
Layton D, Marshall V, Boshier A, Friedmann P, Shakir SA. Serious skin reactions and selective COX-2 inhibitors: a case series from prescription-event monitoring in England. Drug Saf. 2006;29(8):687-96. [Medline].
Werchniak AE, Chaffee S, Dinulos JG. Methotrexate-induced bullous acral erythema in a child. J Am Acad Dermatol. May 2005;52(5 Suppl 1):S93-5. [Medline].
Korman NJ, Eyre RW, Zone J, Stanley JR. Drug-induced pemphigus: autoantibodies directed against the pemphigus antigen complexes are present in penicillamine and captopril-induced pemphigus. J Invest Dermatol. Feb 1991;96(2):273-6. [Medline].
Pinto GM, Lamarao P, Vale T. Captopril-induced pemphigus vegetans with Charcot-Leyden crystals. J Am Acad Dermatol. Aug 1992;27(2 Pt 2):281-4. [Medline].
Ben Salem C, Chenguel L, Ghariani N, Denguezli M, Hmouda H, Bouraoui K. Captopril-induced lichen planus pemphigoides. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. Jul 2008;17(7):722-4. [Medline].
Perry A, Sparling JD, Pennington M. Bullous pemphigoid following therapy with an oral beta-blocker. J Drugs Dermatol. Nov-Dec 2005;4(6):746-8. [Medline].
Aksakal BA, Ozsoy E, Arnavut O, Ali Gurer M. Oral terbinafine-induced bullous pemphigoid. Ann Pharmacother. Nov 2003;37(11):1625-7. [Medline].
Carpenter S, Berg D, Sidhu-Malik N, Hall RP 3rd, Rico MJ. Vancomycin-associated linear IgA dermatosis. A report of three cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jan 1992;26(1):45-8. [Medline].
Waldman MA, Black DR, Callen JP. Vancomycin-induced linear IgA bullous disease presenting as toxic epidermal necrolysis. Clin Exp Dermatol. Nov 2004;29(6):633-6. [Medline].
Whitworth JM, Thomas I, Peltz SA, Sullivan BC, Wolf AH, Cytryn AS. Vancomycin-induced linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD). J Am Acad Dermatol. May 1996;34(5 Pt 2):890-1. [Medline].
Santos-Juanes J, Coto Hernandez R, Trapiella L, Caminal L, Sanchez del Rio J, Soto J. Amoxicillin-associated linear IgA bullous dermatosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. Aug 2007;21(7):992-3. [Medline].
Shimanovich I, Rose C, Sitaru C, Brocker EB, Zillikens D. Localized linear IgA disease induced by ampicillin/sulbactam. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jul 2004;51(1):95-8. [Medline].
Tolland JP, McKeown PP, Corbett JR. Voriconazole-induced pseudoporphyria. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. Feb 2007;23(1):29-31. [Medline].
Hofmann M, Audring H, Sterry W, Trefzer U. Interleukin-2-associated bullous drug dermatosis. Dermatology. 2005;210(1):74-5. [Medline].
Viard I, Wehrli P, Bullani R, Schneider P, Holler N, Salomon D, et al. Inhibition of toxic epidermal necrolysis by blockade of CD95 with human intravenous immunoglobulin. Science. Oct 16 1998;282(5388):490-3. [Medline].
Garcia-Doval I, LeCleach L, Bocquet H, Otero XL, Roujeau JC. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome: does early withdrawal of causative drugs decrease the risk of death?. Arch Dermatol. Mar 2000;136(3):323-7. [Medline].
Alanko K, Stubb S, Kauppinen K. Cutaneous drug reactions: clinical types and causative agents. A five-year survey of in-patients (1981-1985). Acta Derm Venereol. 1989;69(3):223-6. [Medline].
Alcalay J, David M, Ingber A, Hazaz B, Sandbank M. Bullous pemphigoid mimicking bullous erythema multiforme: an untoward side effect of penicillins. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 1988;18(2 Pt 1):345-9. [Medline].
Angelini G, Vena GA, Grandolfo M, Mastrolonardo M. Iatrogenic contact dermatitis and eczematous reactions. Clin Dermatol. Oct-Dec 1993;11(4):467-77. [Medline].
Arndt KA, Jick H. Rates of cutaneous reactions to drugs. A report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program. JAMA. Mar 1 1976;235(9):918-23. [Medline].
Avakian R, Flowers FP, Araujo OE, Ramos-Caro FA. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jul 1991;25(1 Pt 1):69-79. [Medline].
Baird BJ, De Villez RL. Widespread bullous fixed drug eruption mimicking toxic epidermal necrolysis. Int J Dermatol. Apr 1988;27(3):170-4. [Medline].
Bean SF. Cicatricial pemphigoid. Immunofluorescent studies. Arch Dermatol. Oct 1974;110(4):552-5. [Medline].
Bem JL, Mann RD, Rawlins MD. Review of yellow cards--1986 and 1987. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). May 7 1988;296(6632):1319. [Medline].
Bigby M, Jick S, Jick H, Arndt K. Drug-induced cutaneous reactions. A report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program on 15,438 consecutive inpatients, 1975 to 1982. JAMA. Dec 26 1986;256(24):3358-63. [Medline].
Brenner S, Hodak E, Dascalu D, Lurie R, Wolf R. A possible case of drug-induced familial pemphigus. Acta Derm Venereol. 1990;70(4):357-8. [Medline].
Brenner S, Wolf R, Ruocco V. Drug-induced pemphigus. I. A survey. Clin Dermatol. Oct-Dec 1993;11(4):501-5. [Medline].
Collier PM, Wojnarowska F. Drug-induced linear immunoglobulin A disease. Clin Dermatol. Oct-Dec 1993;11(4):529-33. [Medline].
Fabbri P, Panconesi E. Erythema multiforme ("minus" and "maius") and drug intake. Clin Dermatol. Oct-Dec 1993;11(4):479-89. [Medline].
Fellner MJ. Drug-induced bullous pemphigoid. Clin Dermatol. Oct-Dec 1993;11(4):515-20. [Medline].
Freed J, Wells M, Stetson C, Dongwoo L. Bullous reaction to topical methchlorethamine in mycosis fungoides. J Drugs Dermatol. Jan 2006;5(1):66-7. [Medline].
Gabrielsen TO, Staerfelt F, Thune PO. Drug-induced bullous dermatosis with linear IgA deposits along the basement membrane. Acta Derm Venereol. 1981;61(5):439-41. [Medline].
Hardy KM, Perry HO, Pingree GC, Kirby TJ Jr. Benign mucous membrane pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol. Nov 1971;104(5):467-75. [Medline].
Huff JC, Weston WL, Tonnesen MG. Erythema multiforme: a critical review of characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and causes. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 1983;8(6):763-75. [Medline].
Kauppinen K. Cutaneous reactions to drugs with special reference to severe bullous mucocutaneous eruptions and sulphonamides. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1972;68:1-89. [Medline].
Kauppinen K, Stubb S. Drug eruptions: causative agents and clinical types. A series of in-patients during a 10-year period. Acta Derm Venereol. 1984;64(4):320-4. [Medline].
Kuechle MK, Stegemeir E, Maynard B, Gibson LE, Leiferman KM, Peters MS. Drug-induced linear IgA bullous dermatosis: report of six cases and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 1994;30(2 Pt 1):187-92. [Medline].
Landau M, Brenner S. Histopathologic findings in drug-induced pemphigus. Am J Dermatopathol. Aug 1997;19(4):411-4. [Medline].
Lisi P, Stingeni L. Fixed drug eruption: bullous form. Clin Dermatol. Oct-Dec 1993;11(4):461-6. [Medline].
Masu S, Seiji M. Pigmentary incontinence in fixed drug eruptions. Histologic and electron microscopic findings. J Am Acad Dermatol. Apr 1983;8(4):525-32. [Medline].
Nolan L, O'Malley K. Adverse drug reactions in the elderly. Br J Hosp Med. May 1989;41(5):446, 448, 452-7. [Medline].
Roujeau JC, Bioulac-Sage P, Bourseau C, Guillaume JC, Bernard P, Lok C, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Analysis of 63 cases. Arch Dermatol. Sep 1991;127(9):1333-8. [Medline].
Roujeau JC, Stern RS. Severe adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs. N Engl J Med. Nov 10 1994;331(19):1272-85. [Medline].
Ruocco V, De Angelis E, Lombardi ML. Drug-induced pemphigus. II. Pathomechanisms and experimental investigations. Clin Dermatol. Oct-Dec 1993;11(4):507-13. [Medline].
Ruocco V, Pisani M. Induced pemphigus. Arch Dermatol Res. 1982;274(1-2):123-40. [Medline].
Ruocco V, Sacerdoti G. Pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid due to drugs. Int J Dermatol. May 1991;30(5):307-12. [Medline].
Ruocco V, Sacerdoti G. Pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid due to drugs. Int J Dermatol. May 1991;30(5):307-12. [Medline].
Sehgal VN, Gangwani OP. Fixed drug eruption. Current concepts. Int J Dermatol. Mar 1987;26(2):67-74. [Medline].
Thankappan TP, Zachariah J. Drug-specific clinical pattern in fixed drug eruptions. Int J Dermatol. Dec 1991;30(12):867-70. [Medline].
Van Joost T, Van't Veen AJ. Drug-induced cicatricial pemphigoid and acquired epidermolysis bullosa. Clin Dermatol. Oct-Dec 1993;11(4):521-7. [Medline].
Wolf R, Tamir A, Brenner S. Drug-induced versus drug-triggered pemphigus. Dermatologica. 1991;182(4):207-10. [Medline].
Yamaguchi K, Majima M, Katori M, Kakita A, Sugimoto K. Preferential consumption of coagulation factors I, V, and VIII in rat endotoxemia. Shock. Nov 2000;14(5):535-43. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
blistering drug eruptions, vesiculobullous drug-induced disorders, drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions, drug-induced anaphylaxis, adverse cutaneous drug reactions, toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
Overview: Drug-Induced Bullous Disorders