Acute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (ACLE) 

  • Author: Ivan D Camacho, MD; Chief Editor: William D James, MD   more...
 
Updated: Nov 17, 2011
 

Background

Lupus erythematosus is a heterogeneous connective-tissue disease associated with polyclonal B-cell activation and is believed to result from the interplay of genetic, environmental, and hormonal factors. The spectrum of disease involvement can vary from limited cutaneous involvement to devastating systemic disease. (See Etiology.)

From a dermatologic standpoint, the type of skin involvement can prove to be a good barometer of the pattern of underlying systemic activity. Lupus erythematosus–specific skin diseases are recognized in 3 categories, including (1) acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE), (2) subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), and (3) chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE). (See the diagram below.) Clinical characteristics of each group are unique, although histopathologically, only subtle differences are identified. The focus of this article is on acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus.[1, 2] (See Etiology, History, Physical Examination, and Workup.)

Relationship of acute cutaneous lupus erythematosuRelationship of acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE) to systemic disease. LE is lupus erythematosus. CCLE is chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus. SCLE is subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus refers to a typical malar eruption in a butterfly pattern localized to the central portion of the face and/or a more generalized maculopapular eruption representing a photosensitive dermatitis. (See the image below.) The condition has a strong association with the systemic disease for which patients present to rheumatologists and internists. (See History and Physical Examination.)

Erythema involving the malar area, forehead, and nErythema involving the malar area, forehead, and neck. Note sparing of some of the creases.

Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus can be transient, lasting for several days to weeks. Lesions wax and wane with sun exposure over a period of several hours; however, some patients experience prolonged disease activity.

Resolution of lesions may result in postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, especially in patients with darkly pigmented skin. Usually, the lesions are nonscarring. (See Prognosis, History, and Physical Examination.)

Patient education

Educate patients about the nature of skin, which acts as a barometer of disease activity. Control of the cutaneous manifestations depends ultimately on overall control of the disease. Instruct patients regarding the effects of ultraviolet light in exacerbating the disease.

For patient education information, see the Arthritis Center, as well as Lupus (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus).

Next

Etiology

The etiology of lupus erythematosus is believed to be multifactorial, involving genetic, environmental, and hormonal factors. An association with human leukocyte antigen DR2 and human leukocyte antigen DR3 has been identified. Concordance in monozygotic twins and familial associations support a genetic basis in acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

More than 25 genes have been identified as contributing to the mechanisms that predispose patients to lupus. They include alleles in the major histocompatibility complex region (multiple genes): IRF5, ITGAM, STAT4, BLK, BANK1, PDCD1, PTPN22, TNFSF4, TNFA1P3, SPP1, some fc gene receptors, and deficiency in several complement components, including C1qC4+C2.

In patients who are predisposed genetically, exposure to natural ultraviolet radiation is a frequent precipitating factor for lupus erythematosus. In addition, certain viruses (eg, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV]) have been implicated in precipitating or exacerbating lupus erythematosus in genetically predisposed individuals.

Chemicals such as L-canavanine, which is present in alfalfa sprouts, have been known to induce systemic lupus erythematosus–like illness. Drugs implicated in inducing a lupus erythematosus–like illness (eg, procainamide, isoniazid, hydralazine) typically do not induce acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

See also Bullous Lupus Erythematosus, Discoid Lupus Erythematosus, Drug-Induced Lupus Erythematosus, and Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

Immunopathology

Data concerning direct immunofluorescence in acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus are sparse. In one study, the results of 5 (100%) of 5 skin biopsy specimens were reported as positive for the lupus band test. The lupus band test reveals the presence of immunoglobulins and C3 complement components along the dermoepidermal junction. All 3 immunoglobulin classes (immunoglobulin G [IgG], IgM, IgA) and a variety of complement components have been identified at the dermoepidermal junction.

Research has shown that 60% of patients with a malar eruption of lupus erythematosus have positive lupus band test results. In nonlesional skin, positive lupus band test results correlate strongly with an aggressive course of systemic disease.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

In the United States, the malar rash has been reported in 20-60% of patients in large lupus erythematosus cohorts, while limited data suggest that the maculopapular eruption is present in 35% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. The malar rash is believed to be associated with a younger age of disease onset.

Race-related demographics

Precise data concerning the prevalence of acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus in specific racial groups are not available; however, since photosensitivity is observed more frequently in whites than in blacks, the same prevalence of acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus may be inferred. Estimates suggest that 1 in 250 black women in the United States and the Caribbean and 1 in 1000 Chinese persons have systemic lupus erythematosus. Although lupus erythematosus may be rare in most parts of Africa, data concerning this finding conflict.

Data concerning acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus are difficult to interpret, since a lack of conformity is found in the description of lesions, and biopsy data are lacking for skin lesions observed in patients with systemic disease.

Previous
Next

Prognosis

Significant morbidity and potential mortality are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, of which acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus is a manifestation.

The malar eruption tends to wax and wane with systemic activity; however, whether the presence of malar rash indicates a worse overall outlook for patients has not been determined. Progression to lupus erythematosus–specific bullous dermatosis (aggravated by sun exposure) may occur, producing a toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) ̶ type picture.

No definite correlation has been identified between acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and nephritis; however, localized lesions of acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus are believed to tend to wax and wane, paralleling the underlying systemic disease. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation may occur in dark-skinned patients following resolution.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Ivan D Camacho, MD  Assistant Professor of Dermatology, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami, Leonard M Miller School of Medicine; Medical Director of Dermatology Clinic, Jackson Memorial Hospital

Ivan D Camacho, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, American Society for MOHS Surgery, Florida Medical Association, International Society of Dermatology, and Women's Dermatologic Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Charmaine Browne, MD, FRCP(C)  Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas; Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Charmaine Browne, MD, FRCP(C) is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American Contact Dermatitis Society, International Society of Dermatology, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Society for Pediatric Dermatology, Texas Dermatological Society, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

William D James, MD  Paul R Gross Professor of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Vice-Chair, Program Director, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Health System

William D James, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and Society for Investigative Dermatology

Disclosure: Elsevier Royalty Other

Additional Contributors

Jeffrey P Callen, MD Professor of Medicine (Dermatology), Chief, Division of Dermatology, University of Louisville School of Medicine

Jeffrey P Callen, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Physicians, and American College of Rheumatology

Disclosure: Amgen Honoraria Consulting; Abbott Honoraria Consulting; Electrical Optical Sciences Consulting fee Consulting; Celgene Honoraria Safety Monitoring Committee; GSK - Glaxo Smith Kline Consulting fee Consulting; TenXBioPharma Consulting fee Safety Monitoring Committee

Richard P Vinson, MD Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Mountain View Dermatology, PA

Richard P Vinson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, Association of Military Dermatologists, Texas Dermatological Society, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Renner R, Sticherling M. The different faces of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. Apr 2009;144(2):135-47. [Medline].

  2. Moghadam-Kia S, Chilek K, Gaines E, et al. Cross-sectional analysis of a collaborative Web-based database for lupus erythematosus-associated skin lesions: prospective enrollment of 114 patients. Arch Dermatol. Mar 2009;145(3):255-60. [Medline].

  3. Ting W, Stone MS, Racila D, Scofield RH, Sontheimer RD. Toxic epidermal necrolysis-like acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and the spectrum of the acute syndrome of apoptotic pan-epidermolysis (ASAP): a case report, concept review and proposal for new classification of lupus erythematosus vesiculobullous skin lesions. Lupus. 2004;13(12):941-50. [Medline].

  4. Jerdan MS, Hood AF, Moore GW, Callen JP. Histopathologic comparison of the subsets of lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol. Jan 1990;126(1):52-5. [Medline].

  5. Cortés-Hernández J, Torres-Salido M, Castro-Marrero J, Vilardell-Tarres M, Ordi-Ros J. Thalidomide in the treatment of refractory cutaneous lupus: prognostic factors of clinical outcome. Br J Dermatol. Oct 16 2011;[Medline].

  6. Goodfield M, Davison K, Bowden K. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for therapy-resistant cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE). J Dermatolog Treat. Jan 2004;15(1):46-50. [Medline].

  7. Kok MR, Vos K, Bos JD, Tak PP. Remission of incapacitating acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus by B cell-depletive therapy. J Clin Rheumatol. Oct 2010;16(7):345. [Medline].

  8. Uthman I, Taher A, Abbas O, Menassa J, Ghosn S. Successful treatment of refractory skin manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus with rituximab: report of a case. Dermatology. 2008;216(3):257-9. [Medline].

  9. Pisoni CN, Obermoser G, Cuadrado MJ, et al. Skin manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus refractory to multiple treatment modalities: poor results with mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Exp Rheumatol. May-Jun 2005;23(3):393-6. [Medline].

  10. Simsek I, Cinar M, Erdem H, Pay S, Meric C, Dinc A. Efficacy of plasmapheresis in the treatment of refractory toxic epidermal necrolysis-like acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2008;17(6):605-6. [Medline].

  11. Kuhn A, Gensch K, Haust M, et al. Efficacy of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jul 2011;65(1):54-64, 64.e1-2. [Medline].

  12. Díez MT, Boixeda P, Moreno C, González JA, Zamorano ML, Olasolo PJ. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry of cutaneous lupus erythematosus after pulsed dye laser treatment. Dermatol Surg. Jul 2011;37(7):971-81. [Medline].

  13. Kuhn A, Ruland V, Bonsmann G. Photosensitivity, phototesting, and photoprotection in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Lupus. Aug 2010;19(9):1036-46. [Medline].

  14. Ding C, Foote S, Jones G. B-cell-targeted therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus: an update. BioDrugs. 2008;22(4):239-49. [Medline].

  15. ZZZ.

Previous
Next
 
Relationship of acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE) to systemic disease. LE is lupus erythematosus. CCLE is chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus. SCLE is subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Erythema involving the malar area, forehead, and neck. Note sparing of some of the creases.
Toxic epidermal necrolysis–like eruption.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.