eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Diseases of the Oral Mucosa
Oral Frictional Hyperkeratosis: Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Jul 27, 2009
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
- Multimedia
Differential Diagnoses
Other Problems to Be Considered
Hairy leukoplakia
Leukoedema
Actinic cheilitis
Lupus erythematosus
White sponge nevus
Contact stomatitis
Several conditions should be included in the differential diagnosis of frictional keratosis in both children and adults.16,17,18 Occasionally, plaquelike lesions of lichen planus and lupus erythematosus may resemble areas of frictional keratosis. Chemical burns and acute pseudomembranous candidiasis may have the same clinical appearance as frictional keratosis; however, these white areas can be easily wiped off with gauze because they consist of necrotic epithelium (in the case of superficial chemical burns) or fungal colonies (in the case of acute pseudomembranous candidiasis). Sheets or clustered aggregates of Fordyce granules and scars may resemble frictional keratosis because of their yellowish-white, submucosal appearance. In these examples, the surface mucosa is smooth.
Consider genokeratosis, such as white sponge nevus, hereditary benign intraepithelial dyskeratosis, and pachyonychia congenita, when the lesions are multifocal. These 3 autosomal dominant conditions appear in young persons. In white sponge nevus, the hyperkeratinization is restricted to the oral cavity, the esophagus, the anus, and the vagina. In hereditary benign intraepithelial dyskeratosis, gelatinous plaques manifest in the ocular conjunctiva. In pachyonychia congenita, the fingernails exhibit subungual hyperkeratosis.
White patches associated with smoking and smokeless tobacco can be clinically indistinguishable from frictional keratosis. Clinical information regarding tobacco and smokeless tobacco use is essential for differentiating these conditions. Some examples of tobacco-related keratoses are caused by thermal and chemical irritation, while other keratotic lesions represent a precancerous entity. For this reason, differentiating between lesions from smoking or smokeless tobacco and frictional keratosis is important because their prognoses may be different from that associated with frictional keratosis, which has an excellent prognosis. Also see Smokeless Tobacco Lesions.
An uncommon but important adherent white lesion typically found on the lateral border of the tongue is hairy leukoplakia. This shaggy white plaque is caused by the Epstein-Barr virus infection and is associated with immunosuppression resulting from HIV infection. Similarly, the long-term use of topical steroids to treat chronic ulcerative conditions (ie, mucous membrane pemphigoid, erosive lichen planus) may result in the formation of white patches on the lateral borders of the tongue that are indistinguishable from hairy leukoplakia.
Leukoplakia is a clinical term reserved for white lesions that cannot be characterized clinically or pathologically as any other disease (ie, frictional keratosis, lichen planus, candidiasis, hairy leukoplakia, white sponge nevus). Leukoplakia may be associated with premalignant or malignant epithelial changes.
Contact stomatitis associated with the use of artificially flavored cinnamon products (eg, gum, candy, toothpaste, mouthwashes, dental floss) may present as a white patch that may resemble frictional keratosis. However, pain and burning are common symptoms in contact stomatitis.19
Workup
Procedures
- The diagnosis of frictional hyperkeratinization is typically made based on a detailed clinical examination and the finding of an oral habit or some other agent that has produced the chronic, low-grade irritation of the mucosa. In patients in whom the clinical evidence for frictional keratosis is equivocal or the appearance of the lesion is atypical, a biopsy of the tissue is indicated.
- Premalignant and malignant conditions of the oral cavity most often appear benign, and using the clinical history and examination findings alone does not ensure the precise histologic nature of any oral lesion. In most cases, removal of the chronic irritation reverses frictional keratosis in 1-3 weeks.
- If any doubt exists concerning a particular lesion or if residual keratotic foci persist despite the removal of the causative factor, then a biopsy is indicated. Most often, this should be a conventional scalpel biopsy.
- The use of exfoliative cytology for the collection of cells is not usually appropriate because the frictional keratosis lesion, by definition, shows increased keratin on the surface, which makes the harvesting of the intermediate layer and basal cells much more difficult.
- A oral brush biopsy may be used; however, because the thick surface layer of keratin is a barrier, moderate pressure must be applied in order to ensure that an adequate sampling of basal cells is obtained
- Importantly, note that a definitive diagnosis cannot be obtained from an oral brush biopsy specimen. Only a scalpel biopsy can provide an accurate diagnosis of the white lesion in question.
Histologic Findings
The oral mucosa is lined by stratified squamous epithelium that exhibits topographical differences correlated with specific physical demands or a higher degree of specialization. For example, the epithelium lining the floor of the mouth, the ventral side of the tongue, the buccal mucosa, and the soft palate is usually nonkeratinized; however, the gingiva and hard palate are keratinized.
Frictional keratosis shows hyperkeratinization (either hyperorthokeratinization or hyperparakeratinization) and acanthosis as the main microscopic features of the surface epithelium (see Media Files 9-10).
Low-power view of stratified squamous epithelium with marked hyperkeratinization, acanthosis, and a prominent granular cell layer. Courtesy of Catherine M. Flaitz, DDS and Alfredo Aguirre, DDS.
High-power view of the surface keratin layer and a prominent granular cell layer. Courtesy of Catherine M. Flaitz, DDS and Alfredo Aguirre, DDS.
The epithelial surface may be smooth, corrugated, or ragged, with multiple keratin projections. Bacterial colonies are frequently found attached to the surface when it is irregular or shaggy. Often, a prominent granular cell layer is present. Occasionally, vacuolated cells can be seen in the upper spinous cell layer, especially in patients with cheek-biting keratosis. The underlying dense, fibrous connective tissue may demonstrate a patchy chronic inflammatory infiltrate. The terms focal keratosis or focal hyperkeratosis are frequently used for the histopathologic diagnosis. Frictional keratosis is a clinical term that conveys the cause and effect of the condition.
More on Oral Frictional Hyperkeratosis |
| Overview: Oral Frictional Hyperkeratosis |
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Oral Frictional Hyperkeratosis |
| Treatment & Medication: Oral Frictional Hyperkeratosis |
| Follow-up: Oral Frictional Hyperkeratosis |
| Multimedia: Oral Frictional Hyperkeratosis |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Physical and Chemical Injuries. In: Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: WB Saunders; 2009:285-329.
Shulman JD, Beach MM, Rivera-Hidalgo F. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in U.S. adults: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. J Am Dent Assoc. Sep 2004;135(9):1279-86. [Medline].
Shulman JD. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in children and youths in the USA. Int J Paediatr Dent. Mar 2005;15(2):89-97. [Medline].
Bouquot JE, Gorlin RJ. Leukoplakia, lichen planus, and other oral keratoses in 23,616 white Americans over the age of 35 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. Apr 1986;61(4):373-81. [Medline].
Kashani HG, Mackenzie IC, Kerber PE. Cytology of linea alba using a filter imprint technique. Clin Prev Dent. 1980;2:21-4.
Axéll T. Occurrence of leukoplakia and some other oral white lesions among 20,333 adult Swedish people. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. Feb 1987;15(1):46-51. [Medline].
Macigo FG, Mwaniki DL, Guthua SW. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a Kenyan population with special reference to oral leukoplakia. East Afr Med J. Dec 1995;72(12):778-82. [Medline].
Kovac-Kovacic M, Skaleric U. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a population in Ljubljana, Slovenia. J Oral Pathol Med. Aug 2000;29(7):331-5. [Medline].
Parlak AH, Koybasi S, Yavuz T, et al. Prevalence of oral lesions in 13- to 16-year-old students in Duzce, Turkey. Oral Dis. Nov 2006;12(6):553-8. [Medline].
Martinez Diaz-Canel AI, Garcia-Pola Vallejo MJ. Epidemiological study of oral mucosa pathology in patients of the Oviedo School of Stomatology. Med Oral. Jan-Feb 2002;7(1):4-9, 10-6.
Mathew AL, Pai KM, Sholapurkar AA, Vengal M. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in patients visiting a dental school in Southern India. Indian J Dent Res. Apr-Jun 2008;19(2):99-103. [Medline].
Farah CS, Simanovic B, Savage NW. Scope of practice, referral patterns and lesion occurrence of an oral medicine service in Australia. Oral Dis. May 2008;14(4):367-75. [Medline].
Castellanos JL, Díaz-Guzmán L. Lesions of the oral mucosa: an epidemiological study of 23785 Mexican patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. Jan 2008;105(1):79-85. [Medline].
Sarifakioglu E, Gunduz C, Gorpelioglu C. Oral mucosa manifestations in 100 pregnant versus non-pregnant patients: an epidemiological observational study. Eur J Dermatol. Nov-Dec 2006;16(6):674-6. [Medline].
Scully C. Cannabis; adverse effects from an oromucosal spray. Br Dent J. Sep 22 2007;203(6):E12; discussion 336-7. [Medline].
Flaitz CM. Differential diagnosis of oral mucosal lesions in children and adolescents. Adv Dermatol. 2000;16:39-78; discussion 79. [Medline].
Coleman GC, Flaitz CM, Vincent SD. Differential diagnosis of oral soft tissue lesions. Tex Dent J. Jun 2002;119(6):484-8, 490-2, 494-503. [Medline].
Scully C, Felix DH. Oral Medicine--update for the dental practitioner: oral white patches. Br Dent J. Nov 12 2005;199(9):565-72. [Medline].
Miller RL, Gould AR, Bernstein ML. Cinnamon-induced stomatitis venenata, Clinical and characteristic histopathologic features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. Jun 1992;73(6):708-16. [Medline].
Flaitz CM, Felefli S. Complications of an unrecognized cheek biting habit following a dental visit. Pediatr Dent. Nov-Dec 2000;22(6):511-2. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
oral frictional hyperkeratosis, FK, frictional keratosis, friction keratosis, oral friction keratosis, oral lesion, denture friction, broken teeth, fractured, teeth, oral hyperkeratinization, toothbrush keratosis, tongue thrust keratosis, chronic cheek biting, chronic lip biting, cheek bite keratosis, lip bite keratosis, morsicatio buccarum, morsicatio linguorum, ridge callus, oral ridge callus




Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Oral Frictional Hyperkeratosis