Updated: Sep 1, 2009
Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy (MNTI) is a relatively uncommon osteolytic-pigmented neoplasm that primarily affects the jaws of newborn infants. The lesion has had an interesting history since its initial description by Krompecher in 1918 as a congenital melanocarcinoma.1
For the next 5 decades, the lesion was reported under a variety of different names as succeeding authors attempted to identify the cell of origin. Some of the terms applied to this lesion included pigmented ameloblastoma, retinal anlage tumor, melanotic progonoma, melanotic epithelial odontoma, pigmented teratoma, atypical melanoblastoma, melanotic adamantinoma, pigmented epulis, retinal choristoma, melanoameloblastoma, and retinoblastic teratoma. These terms reflected theories of suspected origin from the odontogenic apparatus, the pigmented anlage of the retina, or the sensory neuroectodermal tissues.
In 1966, Borello and Gorlin reported a case with high urinary excretion of vanillylmandelic acid (VMA), suggesting a neural crest origin, and they proposed the term melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy.2 Since then, numerous histochemical, immunohistochemical, electron microscopic, and tissue culture studies have supported the neural crest origin and confirmed the preferred term of melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy.
Approximately 200 cases of melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy (MNTI) have been reported in the literature. An exact number is difficult to discern because of the variety of terms that have been applied to the lesion in the past.3
The sexual predilection for melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy (MNTI) is nearly equal, with a male-to-female ratio of 6:7.
Most patients, by some estimates more than 90%, present with the tumor in the first year of life, usually from age 1-6 months. The mean age of patients with melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy (MNTI) is 4.3 months. Although extremely rare, a few cases of MNTI have been reported in adults, notably, a 23-year-old man, a 24-year-old woman, and a 67-year-old woman.
See Pathophysiology.
Consider clinical, radiographic, laboratory, and histologic findings when establishing a proper differential diagnosis for melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy (MNTI). The MNTI often presents as a fast-growing lesion, suggesting a clinical impression of infection or malignant neoplasm. The location in the anterior aspect of the maxilla is consistent with a number of odontogenic cysts and tumors; however, the odontogenic cysts (eg, periapical cyst, dentigerous cyst, odontogenic keratocyst, calcifying odontogenic cyst) occur in an older age group, teenaged through middle-aged adults. The same age differential is noted with respect to the more common odontogenic tumors (eg, ameloblastoma, odontoma, adenomatoid odontogenic tumor, calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor, ameloblastic fibroma, odontogenic myxoma, odontogenic fibroma).
In addition to a diagnosis of MNTI, the young age of the patient as well as the maxillary location is also compatible with a clinical diagnosis of congenital epulis of the newborn. Many nonodontogenic tumors are possible in the jaws, including central giant cell granuloma, ossifying fibroma, fibrous dysplasia, hemangioma, arteriovenous malformation, craniopharyngioma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and lymphoma. However, only Langerhans cell histiocytosis, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and lymphoma are common in young children.
The radiographic appearance of a maxillary alveolar low-density radiolucency, containing no evidence of calcification, is consistent with any of the odontogenic cysts or tumors. Additionally, many of the aforementioned nonodontogenic lesions may also present with a radiographic appearance similar to that of MNTI.
Once a differential diagnosis is established from the clinical and radiographic findings, histologic evaluation is necessary to determine the final diagnosis. The histologic appearance of MNTI is usually that of a small, dark, cell neoplasm suggestive of neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing tumor, lymphoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Although the histologic appearance is characteristic, special immunohistochemical stains and electron microscopy may be necessary to make a definitive diagnosis.
The histologic appearance of MNTI is unique and characteristic in that a distinct biphasic pattern exists. A moderately vascular fibrous background supports the MNTI. The peripheral borders are faintly noted, at best, by a thin, delicate, fibrous layer; however, most often, this nonencapsulated tumor shows local infiltration into the adjacent bone.
One portion of the lesion contains large polygonal cells arranged in sheets or alveolarlike structures. These large cells appear, under hematoxylin and eosin staining, to have pale abundant cytoplasm and pale nuclei with finely dispersed chromatin. These cells often contain the melanin pigment that gives the MNTI its blue-black clinical appearance.
Fontana stain can be used to enhance the demonstration of the melanin pigment. The cuboidal polygonal cells are at the periphery of the alveolar spaces, while the central portion contains the second smaller characteristic cell type. These cells are lymphocytelike or neuroblastlike with small, dark nuclei and little, if any, cytoplasm. These cells occasionally also form isolated clusters of their own within the fibrous stroma. Throughout the lesion, mitoses are rare but, when present, are normal in appearance. Cellular pleomorphism is scant. The few reported malignant cases of MNTI have little variation from the description above other than an increase in mitoses (3 or more per high-power field), hypercellularity, and focal necrosis.5 The malignant diagnosis is more one of increased growth rate, infiltration, and metastases. Metastatic lesions have been described in the lymph nodes, the liver, the adrenal gland, the spinal cord, and a variety of other sites.
Immunohistochemistry is of assistance in cases that are more difficult to diagnose. The cuboidal cells express cytokeratin as well as melanoma-associated antigen (HMB-45), but they are usually negative for S-100. Some cells are also positive for vimentin, epithelial membrane antigen, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neuron specific enolase (NSE), and synaptophysin.
Electron microscopic examination demonstrates ultrastructural evidence of neural, epithelial, and melanocytic features. Fine, delicate cytoplasmic fibers are suggestive of neurofibrils, reminiscent of glial tissue. Typically, some of the cells demonstrate neurosecretory granules. Evidence exists of basal laminae and interdigitating desmosomal attachments to adjacent cells, which is suggestive of epithelial features in some cells. Finally, melanosomes are noted in many of the cuboidal cells.
The polygonal cells noted for their melanin production have been cultured in vitro. These cells developed long dendritic processes suggestive of their neural crest origin. Additionally, melanotransferrin expression has been noted with DNA analysis of these cells. The other small, dark, neuroblastlike cells have also been studied; however, to date, no molecular genetic basis to link MNTI to neuroblastoma is apparent.
The treatment of choice for melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy (MNTI) is surgical excision, and it is usually curative. This treatment can usually be accomplished with a partial maxillectomy by using a Weber-Fergusson incision and a facial degloving approach. Teeth, developing teeth, and the adjacent bone must be sacrificed when they lie near the borders of MNTI, since many clinicians advocate that a 5-mm margin of healthy tissue be included with the surgical specimen.6
The possibility of local recurrence is a problem that has been documented to range from 10-60% of patients depending on the study quoted. Overall, the average recurrence rate is 15-20%. The recurrent lesions, possibly secondary to inadequate excision or multicentricity, usually become apparent within the first year after surgery. In instances of inoperable recurrence or where clear margins are impossible to obtain, radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy have been used, but too few examples exist for preferences to be established.7
Although MNTI is an aggressive benign tumor, malignant variants have been reported, ranging from 1.5% of total MNTI to 2.1% of the maxillary subset.8 Metastatic spread of MNTI occurs infrequently, in less than 5% of malignant cases. Management of these rare cases is different. Few, if any, parameters exist, either clinically or histologically, to predict the development of metastatic lesions. In a few cases reported as malignant, the histologic features have taken on a neuroblastomalike appearance.
Krompecher Z. Zur histogenese and morphologic den adamantinome und sonstiger kiefergeschwulste. Beitr Pathol Anat. 1918;165-97.
Borello ED, Gorlin RJ. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy--a neoplasm of neural crese origin. Report of a case associated with high urinary excretion of vanilmandelic acid. Cancer. Feb 1966;19(2):196-206. [Medline].
Neville B, Damm D, Allen C. Melanotic Neuroectodermal Tumor of Infancy. In: Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd. St Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier; 2009:533-534.
Matsumoto M, Sakuma J, Suzuki K, et al. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy in the skull: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. Mar 2005;63(3):275-80. [Medline].
Dammann O, Hagel C, Allers B, et al. Malignant melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy. Childs Nerv Syst. Mar 1995;11(3):186-8. [Medline].
Dashti SR, Cohen ML, Cohen AR. Role of radical surgery for intracranial melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy: case report. Neurosurgery. Jul 1999;45(1):175-8. [Medline].
Woessmann W, Neugebauer M, Gossen R, et al. Successful chemotherapy for melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy in a baby. Med Pediatr Oncol. Mar 2003;40(3):198-9. [Medline].
Cutler LS, Chaudhry AP, Topazian R. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy: an ultrastructural study, literature review, and reevaluation. Cancer. Jul 15 1981;48(2):257-70. [Medline].
Barrett AW, Morgan M, Ramsay AD, Farthing PM, Newman L, Speight PM. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. Jun 2002;93(6):688-98. [Medline].
Bouckaert MM, Raubenheimer EJ. Gigantiform melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. Nov 1998;86(5):569-72. [Medline].
Dehner LP, Sibley RK, Sauk JJ Jr. Malignant melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy: a clinical, pathologic, ultrastructural and tissue culture study. Cancer. Apr 1979;43(4):1389-410. [Medline].
Fletcher C. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy. Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and flow cytometry study. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;17:566-73.
Gaiger de Oliveira M, Thompson LD, Chaves AC, et al. Management of melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy. Ann Diagn Pathol. Aug 2004;8(4):207-12. [Medline].
Hoffman S, Jacoway J, Krolls S. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy. In: AFIP fascicle 24: Intraosseous and Parosteal Tumors of the Jaws. 1987:165-9.
Hoshina Y, Hamamoto Y, Suzuki I, et al. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy in the mandible: report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. May 2000;89(5):594-9. [Medline].
Johnson RE, Scheithauer BW, Dahlin DC. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy. A review of seven cases. Cancer. Aug 15 1983;52(4):661-6. [Medline].
Kapadia SB, Frisman DM, Hitchcock CL, et al. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy. Clinicopathological,immunohistochemical, and flow cytometric study. Am J Surg Pathol. Jun 1993;17(6):566-73. [Medline].
Kaya S, Unal OF, Sarac S, Gedikoglu G. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy: report of two cases and review of literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Apr 15 2000;52(2):169-72. [Medline].
Khoddami M, Squire J, Zielenska M, Thorner P. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy: a molecular genetic study. Pediatr Dev Pathol. Jul-Aug 1998;1(4):295-9. [Medline].
Liu HH, Chen TW, Chang HS. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy in the maxilla: a case report. Int J Paediatr Dent. Sep 2004;14(5):371-5. [Medline].
Massachusetts General Hospital. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Case 7-2001. A male infant with a right maxillary mass. N Engl J Med. Mar 8 2001;344(10):750-7. [Medline].
Nelson ZL, Newman L, Loukota RA, Williams DM. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Dec 1995;33(6):375-80. [Medline].
Oruckaptan HH, Soylemezoglu F, Kutluk T, Akalan N. Benign melanocytic tumor in infancy: discussion on a rare case and review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosurg. May 2000;32(5):240-7. [Medline].
Neurotodermal tumours. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, eds. Pathology & Genetics: Head and Neck Tumors. Lyon, France: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours; 2005:70-72.
Pettinato G, Manivel JC, d'Amore ES, Jaszcz W, Gorlin RJ. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy. A reexamination of a histogenetic problem based on immunohistochemical, flow cytometric, and ultrastructural study of 10 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. Mar 1991;15(3):233-45. [Medline].
Puchalski R, Shah UK, Carpentieri D, et al. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy (MNTI) of the hard palate: presentation and management. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Jun 30 2000;53(2):163-8. [Medline].
melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy, MNTI, pigmented ameloblastoma, melanoameloblastoma, retinal anlage tumor, melanotic progonoma, melanotic epithelial odontoma, pigmented teratoma, atypical melanoblastoma, melanotic adamantinoma, pigmented epulis, retinal choristoma, retinoblastic teratoma, congenital melanocarcinoma
William M Carpenter, DDS, MS, Professor, Chairman, Department of Pathology and Medicine, University of the Pacific Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry
William M Carpenter, DDS, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and American Academy of Oral Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Mark G Lebwohl, MD, Chairman, Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Mark G Lebwohl, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Abbott Laboratories Honoraria Consulting; Actelion Honoraria Consulting; Amgen Honoraria Consulting; Astellas Honoraria Consulting; Centocor Honoraria Consulting; DermiPsor Honoraria Consulting; Galderma Consulting; Genentech Honoraria Consulting; Helix BioMedix Honoraria Consulting; Medicis Honoraria Investigator
Richard P Vinson, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Mountain View Dermatology, PA
Richard P Vinson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, Association of Military Dermatologists, Texas Dermatological Society, and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Drore Eisen, MD, DDS, Consulting Staff, Department of Dermatology, Dermatology Research Associates of Cincinnati
Drore Eisen, MD, DDS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American Academy of Oral Medicine, and American Dental Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Glen H Crawford, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Chief, Division of Dermatology, The Pennsylvania Hospital
Glen H Crawford, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society of USAF Flight Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Dirk M Elston, MD, Director, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous Chief Editor, William D. James, MD, and previous authors, James Burns, DDS, PhD, MEd, and Robert Strauss, DDS, to the development and writing of this article.
Further Reading© 1994-
by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)