Introduction
Background
Friction blisters of the skin commonly occur in active populations. They are the result of frictional forces between the involved skin area and the object with which the skin is in contact. Friction blisters create localized discomfort; however, they should not be taken lightly because secondary impetigo may become a serious complication with resulting cellulitis and sepsis.1
The bulk of research on friction blisters comes from the military because of the nature of the physical activity involved in this field. Friction blisters have also received much attention in the field of sports medicine.
The eMedicine articles Impetigo and Cellulitis may be helpful, as may the Medscape Exercise and Sports Medicine Resource Center and the Sepsis Resource Center.
Pathophysiology
A frictional force causing friction blisters occurs when the skin is in contact with a surface and an attempt is made to move across the skin with an external force. Frictional force opposes this movement. The influence of epidermal hydration on the friction of human skin against textiles was studied. Increasing cutaneous hydration may cause sex-specific changes in the mechanical properties and/or surface topography of human skin, leading to skin softening and increased real contact area and adhesion.2
Studies involving rubbing the skin with a constant force show an initial slight exfoliation of the skin over the involved area. Focally, mild erythema also develops. The patient may experience stinging or burning, while a zone of pallor develops around the erythematous area. The pallor eventually extends into the region of erythema and this area develops into a blister.
The effect of wearing socks with different frictional properties on plantar shear was studied because this is a possible mechanical risk factor for foot lesion development.3 Wearing socks with low friction against the foot skin reduced the plantar shear force on the skin more than a sock with low friction against the insole.
Mortality/Morbidity
Secondary impetigo may become a serious complication, with the potential for cellulitis and sepsis.
Race
No known predilection is reported for any particular race.
Sex
No known predilection is described for either sex.
Age
No known predilection is apparent for any age group.
Clinical
History
- Children often present with poorly fitting shoes and reporting a blister on the heel.
- Friction blisters tend to occur in areas of thick adherent stratum corneum (eg, palms, soles, heels, dorsa of fingers).
- In regions of the body where the stratum corneum is thinner, a repeated friction force causes the stratum corneum to erode, and instead of a blister, an erosion or abrasion occurs.
- The likelihood of forming a friction blister at susceptible sites is based on the magnitude of the frictional force and the number of times an object moves across the skin (ie, shear cycles). Moisture and lubricating substances present on the skin surface are additional factors.
- With a greater frictional force, fewer cycles of rubbing against the skin are needed to produce a blister.
- Moisture on the skin surface may either increase the friction force or, in the case of very moist skin, decrease it temporarily by providing lubrication.
- Lubricating agents also tend to reduce the friction force temporarily at the onset; however, friction tends to increase with prolonged application of the external force.
- Pyogenic granuloma on the hand has been described subsequent to a friction blister in a hand surgeon.4
Physical
Discrete bullae formation at sites of trauma is evident.
Causes
Poorly fitting shoes are the most common cause. Heat, sweating, and maceration of the skin may predispose to friction blister formation.
More on Friction Blisters |
Overview: Friction Blisters |
| Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Friction Blisters |
| Treatment & Medication: Friction Blisters |
| Follow-up: Friction Blisters |
| References |
| Next Page » |
References
Hoeffler DF. Friction blisters and cellulitis in a navy recruit population. Mil Med. May 1975;140(5):333-7. [Medline].
Gerhardt LC, Strässle V, Lenz A, Spencer ND, Derler S. Influence of epidermal hydration on the friction of human skin against textiles. J R Soc Interface. Mar 10 2008;[Medline].
Dai XQ, Li Y, Zhang M, Cheung JT. Effect of sock on biomechanical responses of foot during walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). Mar 2006;21(3):314-21. [Medline].
Sasmaz S, Karaoguz A, Uzel M, Coban YK. Pyogenic granuloma on the hand subsequent to friction blister in a hand surgeon. Dermatol Online J. 2006;12(3):22. [Medline].
Sevilla JA, Rodriguez FM, Dallasta RM. [The treatment of blisters caused by friction while hiking the Road to Santiago]. Rev Enferm. Jan 2007;30(1):32-6. [Medline].
Knapik JJ, Reynolds K, Barson J. Influence of an antiperspirant on foot blister incidence during cross-country hiking. J Am Acad Dermatol. Aug 1998;39(2 Pt 1):202-6. [Medline].
Reynolds K, Darrigrand A, Roberts D, Knapik J, Pollard J, Duplantis K, et al. Effects of an antiperspirant with emollients on foot-sweat accumulation and blister formation while walking in the heat. J Am Acad Dermatol. Oct 1995;33(4):626-30. [Medline].
Jagoda A, Madden H, Hinson C. A friction blister prevention study in a population of marines. Mil Med. Jan 1981;146(1):42-4. [Medline].
Knapik JJ, Hamlet MP, Thompson KJ, Jones BH. Influence of boot-sock systems on frequency and severity of foot blisters. Mil Med. Oct 1996;161(10):594-8. [Medline].
Smith W, Walter J Jr, Bailey M. Effects of insoles in Coast Guard basic training footwear. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Dec 1985;75(12):644-7. [Medline].
Spence WR, Shields MN. Insole to reduce shearing forces on the soles of the feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Aug 1968;49(8):476-9. [Medline].
Spence WR, Shields MN. New insole for prevention of athletic blisters. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. Sep 1968;8(3):177-80. [Medline].
Akers WA. Measurements of friction injuries in man. Am J Ind Med. 1985;8(4-5):473-81. [Medline].
Akers WA, Leonard F, Ousterhout DK, Cortese TA Jr. Treating friction blisters with alkyl- -cyanoacrylates. Arch Dermatol. Apr 1973;107(4):544-7. [Medline].
Akers WA, Sulzberger MB. The friction blister. Mil Med. Jan 1972;137(1):1-7. [Medline].
Darrigrand A, Reynolds K, Jackson R, Hamlet M, Roberts D. Efficacy of antiperspirants on feet. Mil Med. May 1992;157(5):256-9. [Medline].
Epstein WL, Fukuyama K, Cortese TA. Autoradiographic study of friction blisters. RNA, DNA, and protein synthesis. Arch Dermatol. Jan 1969;99(1):94-106. [Medline].
Herring KM, Richie DH Jr. Friction blisters and sock fiber composition. A double-blind study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Feb 1990;80(2):63-71. [Medline].
Hunter JA, McVittie E, Comaish JS. Light and electron microscopic studies of physical injury to the skin. II. Friction. Br J Dermatol. May 1974;90(5):491-9. [Medline].
Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Duplantis KL, Jones BH. Friction blisters. Pathophysiology, prevention and treatment. Sports Med. Sep 1995;20(3):136-47. [Medline].
Rumball JS, Lebrun CM, Di Ciacca SR, Orlando K. Rowing injuries. Sports Med. 2005;35(6):537-55. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
cellulitis, sepsis, impetigo, moleskin
Overview: Friction Blisters