MRSA Skin Infection in Athletes
- Author: Sarah Perloff, DO, FACP; Chief Editor: Craig C Young, MD more...
Staphylococcus aureus is a natural bacterium in human hosts that can also cause a broad spectrum of disease. Community-associated skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) are most commonly caused by staphylococci or streptococci. Over the past 4 decades, epidemiologic tendencies have shown an escalation not only in healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus (HA-MRSA) but also in community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA).
CA-MRSA infections have become more common in athletes[3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15] and active individuals since the first reported cases in a high school wrestling team in 1993 and a British rugby club in 1998. CA-MRSA differs from HA-MRSA in its genetic makeup, its increased pathogenicity, and its susceptibility to antibiotic treatment.[18, 19, 20]
For patient education resources, see Infections Center, MRSA Infection (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection), Sepsis (Blood Infection), Life-Threatening Skin Rashes, and Antibiotics.
In the United States, most community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus (CA-MRSA) infections have been caused by the USA300 epidemic clone. Outbreaks caused by USA300 have been reported in at least 38 states, and this strain accounts for 50% of all S aureus infections and up to 98% of CA-MRSA infections in the United States.
The resistance of MRSA to beta-lactam antibiotics is due to the presence of the mecA gene sequence. The mecA gene produces transpeptidase PBP2a (penicillin-binding peptide) that decreases the bacterial affinity for beta-lactam antibiotics.[19, 23, 24]
The mecA gene is carried as a mobile genetic element in a staphylococcal chromosome cassette (SCC), with the entire complex known as the SCCmec element.
Hospital-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) typically contains SCCmec genes type II (SCCmecII) and III (SCCmecIII), which are larger genes and confer multidrug resistance. The CA-MRSA strains have SCCmec type IV gene (SCCmecIV), a small gene which codes for fewer resistance elements and thus retains susceptibility to macrolides, quinolones, tetracyclines, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and lincosamides.
CA-MRSA has been found in some cases to be more virulent than HA-MRSA. Besides conferring methicillin resistance, the SCCmecIV genes also code for the arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) virulence factor. PVL is a bicomponent toxin that forms pores in neutrophils; it has been associated with furunculosis and severe bone and joint infections.
According to a US population-based survey, the community prevalence of methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA) was 31.6% and that of methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) WAS 0.84%, with the anterior nares being the most consistent site of isolation. Other less common sites of colonization include the skin, perineum, gastrointestinal tract, and throat.
Populations that have been reported to have increased rates of S aureus colonization include persons with type 1 diabetes, intravenous drug users, asthmatic patients, the elderly, persons who require hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, persons with rheumatoid arthritis, those with chronic sinusitis, and persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
Socio-economic and lifestyle aspects that predispose to colonization include: overcrowding, poor access to healthcare, suboptimal personal hygiene practices, and sharing of personal items. Populations reportedly at risk for CA-MRSA outbreaks specifically include military recruits, children in day care, prison inmates, homosexual men, injection drug users, and veterinarians, particularly those who have contact with swine.[7, 27, 28]
CA-MRSA outbreaks in athletes and other populations
Most publicized reports of CA-MRSA infection have been on college or professional football teams.[3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] However, outbreaks have also been reported in other sports, such as wrestling, rugby, and fencing. In a study of all Nebraska high schools between 2006 and 2008, Buss et al determined that among the schools that responded, MRSA infections rose from 4.4% in the 2006-2007 academic year to 14.4% in the 2007-2008 academic year; the incidence per 10,000 wrestlers rose 3-fold from 19.6 to 60.1 and that per 10,000 football players increased 5-fold from 5.0 to 25.1.
Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) represent approximately 90% of all S aureus infections. Most community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus (CA-MRSA) infections initially manifest as folliculitis or similar SSTIs. Classically, the athlete may describe his or her presentation as an "infected pimple" or "insect bite." Some CA-MRSA infections may progress to abscess formation.
The initial clinical examination usually reveals a localized area of erythema, warmth, and swelling. Occasionally, the patient may have swelling and pain in a joint. Alternatively, sports-related CA-MRSA may present as an abscess with surrounding cellulitis in an athletic young adult, with pain that is out of proportion to the findings on physical examination. In more advanced cases, moderate to severe pain at the site of the infection may be reported; the pain may result from soft-tissue necrosis from Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) activity.
Although not very prevalent in athletes, invasive disease that causes infections of the bloodstream, respiratory tract, bones, joints, and surgical wounds are concerning due to their associated elevated morbidity and mortality. In severe cases of CA-MRSA infection, endocarditis, septicemia, necrotizing fasciitis, osteomyelitis, and multisystem organ failure, or death due to overwhelming sepsis may occur. Mortality from S aureus bacteremia is estimated to be 10-20% in the developed world.
The most common route of transmission of CA-MRSA is though an open wound, such as a superficial abrasion, or from contact with a CA-MRSA carrier. Other methods of transmission include poor hand washing, poor personal hygiene (eg, not showering after workouts), sharing personal items (eg, razors, towels, clothing), or a failure to properly clean and disinfect exercise and training equipment.
In 2004, an outbreak of MRSA strain USA300 occurred amongst college football players in Connecticut. The infection was associated with player position (cornerbacks and wide receivers), abrasions from artificial grass ("turf burns"), and body shaving (relative risk, 6.1) as the most obvious portal of entry of S aureus. Cornerbacks and wide receivers were a subpopulation with frequent direct person-to-person contact with each other.
Treatment & Management
The primary method of treatment for community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus (CA-MRSA) skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs)) includes incision and drainage (I&D) of abscesses, inflamed epidermoid cysts, carbuncles, and large furuncles. Systemic therapy with anti-staphylococcal antibiotics are indicated in moderate to severe disease, especially in the presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), as definied by two or more of the following:
Temperature greater than 38ºC or lower than 36ºC
Tachypnea (>24 breaths per minute)
Tachycardia (>90 beats per minute)
White blood cell (WBC) count greater than 12,000 cells/μL or less than 400 cells/μL
In the presence of purulent discharge, obtain cultures to identify the causative organism and allow for directed antibiotic therapy.
Mupirocin and retapamulin are topical antibiotic treatments of choice for bullous and nonbullous impetigo. These agents are used twice daily for 5 days. However, in patients with multiple lesions or in outbreak settings, oral treatment is preferred to help reduce transmission of infection.
Oral (PO) antibiotic agents that may be used to treat to CA-MRSA on an outpatient basis include the following:
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim DS): Administer 1 or 2 tablets PO twice daily for 7 days 
Clindamycin: Administer 300-450 mg PO 3 times a day; resistance to clindamycin is increasing because of the inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (iMLSb) phenotype, which may result in cross-resistance to clindamycin
Doxycycline: Administer 100 mg PO twice daily; this agent is not recommended for children younger than 8 years
Linezolid: Administer 600 mg PO twice daily; note that cost often prohibits the use of this agent
Note that ciprofloxacin has a 33% sensitivity in some areas. Therefore, this drug is not recommended due to resistance and reports of clinical failures despite in vitro susceptibility.
The susceptibility of CA-MRSA is dependent on local resistance rates (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] guidelines [see Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-associated Infections [HAI]).
Treatment of moderate to severe CA-MRSA infections may require surgical debridement of the abscess, intravenous (IV) antibiotics, and hospitalization. The need for hospitalization should be made on a case-by-case basis.
IV antibiotics that may be used to treat inpatient cases of CA-MRSA include the following:
Vancomycin: Administer 30 mg/kg/day IV in two divided doses; vancomycin is the parenteral drug of choice for treatment of infections caused by MRSA
Linezolid: Administer 600 mg IV every 12 hours; this agent may increase serotonin central nervous system (CNS) levels as a result of MAO-A inhibition, thereby increasing the risk of serotonin syndrome 
Clindamycin: Administer 600 mg IV every 8 hours
Daptomycin: Administer 4 mg/kg IV every 24 hours; note that this agent can cause myopathy
Ceftaroline: Administer 600 mg IV twice a daily 
Dalbavancin: Administer 1 g IV once weekly; this agent is a second-generation bactericidal glycopeptide that received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in May 2014 for the treatment of S aureus infections (MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S aureus [MSSA]) after it was proven to be noninferior to vancomycin IV and then linezolid PO in the DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 trials, respectively 
Tedizolid: Administer 200 mg IV once daily, infused over 1 hour, for 6 days  ; this agent is an oxazolidinone antibacterial drug designed to enhance activity against gram-positive pathogens; tedizolid received FDA approval in June 2014 for the treatment of MRSA and MSSA SSTIs after it was proven to be statistically noninferior to linezolid in the ESTABLISH-1 and ESTABLISH-2 trials [35, 36]
When an athlete has recurrent MRSA infections, clinicians should suspect resistance to the previous antibiotic or nasal colonization. Obtain a nasal swab for culture to determine if decolonization is necessary. Recurrent abscesses need to be drained and cultured early in the course of the infection, followed by administration of a 5-10 – day course of targeted antimicrobial therapy. If the nasal swab culture is positive for CA-MRSA, the athlete should complete a 5-day regimen of with mupirocin antibiotic ointment twice a day applied to the nares and chlorhexidine washes once daily, in conjunction with daily decontamination of personal hygiene items (eg, towels) in an effort to decolonize the individual and to reduce the likelihood of recurrence.
Several key methods can be used for prevention of the spread of community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus (CA-MRSA) infections. Because the most common source of infection is from close contact or from an open wound, preventive measures should focus on proper hygiene. Hand washing, using liquid soap instead of bar soap in institutions (to prevent sharing of a contaminated surface), and antibacterial hand gels should be encouraged, both for the infected patient as well as for individuals who come in direct contact with the patient. Additionally, open wounds and abrasions should be covered and protected.
Athletes should be educated and instructed to not share personal hygiene products such as razors or towels. Cleaning and disinfection are important for items such as mats, stretchers, locker room benches, and floors.
Medical and training staff should continue to practice universal infectious disease protection measures. These personnel should ensure the proper disposal of bandages after dressing changes and the routine cleaning of equipment such as training tables, whirlpools, and exercise mats. Additionally, athletic trainers must be familiar with the most evidence-based guidelines for infection control in the athletic facility and apply those recommendations accordingly.
Nonantibiotic methods to reduce nasal colonization by S aureus are emerging. A study by Steed et al showed nasal application of a nonantibiotic, alcohol-based antiseptic (Nozin Nasal Sanitizer Advanced Antiseptic from Global Life Technologies, Corp) was effective in reducing S aureus and total bacterial carriage, suggesting the usefulness of this approach as a safe, effective, and convenient alternative to antibiotic treatment. Seventy-eight of 387 healthcare providers screened (20.2%) tested positive for S aureus infection. Of 39 subjects who tested positive for S aureus infection who completed the study, 20 received antiseptic and 19 received placebo treatment. Antiseptic treatment reduced S aureus colony forming units from baseline by 99% (median) and 82% (mean) (P < 0.001). Total bacterial colony forming units were reduced by 91% (median) and 71% (mean) (P < 0.001).
Return to Play
Athletes with mild cases of community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus (CA-MRSA) infections should be removed from team-related activities until 72 hours after initiation of oral antimicrobial therapy and demonstrated clinical improvement (ie, the presence of a well-formed scab without active discharge). Abrasions, infected or not, should be covered with a protective covering, and the athlete should be reevaluated daily for signs or symptoms of recurrence or worsening of the infection. Training staff should ensure proper disinfection of equipment and surfaces with which the infected athlete may come in contact, such as training tables, protective equipment, or wrestling mats, among other items.
Tong SY, Chen LF, Fowler VG Jr. Colonization, pathogenicity, host susceptibility, and therapeutics for Staphylococcus aureus: what is the clinical relevance?. Semin Immunopathol. 2012 Mar. 34(2):185-200. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Dryden MS. Skin and soft tissue infection: microbiology and epidemiology. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Jul. 34 (suppl 1):S2-7. [Medline].
Kurkowski C. CA-MRSA. The new sports pathogen. Orthop Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct. 26(5):310-4; quiz 315-6. [Medline].
Benjamin HJ, Nikore V, Takagishi J. Practical management: community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA): the latest sports epidemic. Clin J Sport Med. 2007 Sep. 17(5):393-7. [Medline].
Sedgwick PE, Dexter WW, Smith CT. Bacterial dermatoses in sports. Clin Sports Med. 2007 Jul. 26(3):383-96. [Medline].
Elston DM. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Jan. 56(1):1-16; quiz 17-20. [Medline].
Begier EM, Frenette K, Barrett NL, et al. A high-morbidity outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among players on a college football team, facilitated by cosmetic body shaving and turf burns. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Nov 15. 39(10):1446-53. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections among competitive sports participants--Colorado, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Los Angeles County, 2000-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003 Aug 22. 52(33):793-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Manzur A, Dominguez AM, Pujol M, et al. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: an emerging threat in Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Jan 11. epub ahead of print. [Medline].
Buss BF, Mueller SW, Theis M, Keyser A, Safranek TJ. Population-based estimates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Areus (MRSA) infections among high school athletes--Nebraska, 2006-2008. J Sch Nurs. 2009 Aug. 25(4):282-91. [Medline].
Pecci M, Comeau D, Chawla V. Skin conditions in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Feb. 37(2):406-18. [Medline].
Kirkland EB, Adams BB. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and athletes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Sep. 59(3):494-502. [Medline].
Grosset-Janin A, Nicolas X, Saraux A. Sport and infectious risk: a systematic review of the literature over 20 years. Med Mal Infect. 2012 Nov. 42(11):533-44. [Medline].
Lindenmayer JM, Schoenfeld S, O'Grady R, Carney JK. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a high school wrestling team and the surrounding community. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Apr 27. 158(8):895-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Stacey AR, Endersby KE, Chan PC, Marples RR. An outbreak of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a rugby football team. Br J Sports Med. 1998 Jun. 32(2):153-4. [Medline].
Kuroda M, Ohta T, Uchiyama I, et al. Whole genome sequencing of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2001 Apr 21. 357(9264):1225-40. [Medline].
Feng Y, Chen CJ, Su LH, et al. Evolution and pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus: lessons learned from genotyping and comparative genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008 Jan. 32(1):23-37. [Medline].
Elston DM. Handling a community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak: emerging data. Cutis. 2008 Aug. 82(2 Suppl 2):13-7. [Medline].
Fontanilla JM, Kirkland KB, Talbot EA, et al. Outbreak of skin infections in college football team members due to an unusual strain of community-acquired methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Feb. 48(2):609-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Chadwick SG, Prasad A, Smith WL, Mordechai E, Adelson ME, Gygax SE. Detection of epidemic USA300 community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains by use of a single allele-specific PCR assay targeting a novel polymorphism of Staphylococcus aureus pbp3. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Aug. 51(8):2541-50. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Baba T, Takeuchi F, Kuroda M, et al. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet. 2002 May 25. 359(9320):1819-27. [Medline].
Miller LG, Diep BA. Clinical practice: colonization, fomites, and virulence: rethinking the pathogenesis of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 1. 46(5):752-60. [Medline].
Graham PL 3rd, Lin SX, Larson EL. A U.S. population-based survey of Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 7. 144(5):318-25. [Medline].
Wulf MW, Sorum M, van Nes A, et al. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among veterinarians: an international study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Jan. 14(1):29-34. [Medline].
Huang H, Cohen SH, King JH, Monchaud C, Nguyen H, Flynn NM. Injecting drug use and community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Apr. 60(4):347-50. [Medline].
Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15. 59(2):e10-52. [Medline].
US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: Serious CNS reactions possible when linezolid (Zyvox®) is given to patients taking certain psychiatric medications. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm265305.htm. Accessed: July 27, 2011.
Sader HS, Fritsche TR, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline and ME1036 tested against clinical strains of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jan 7. epub ahead of print. [Medline].
Boucher HW, Wilcox M, Talbot GH, Puttagunta S, Das AF, Dunne MW. Once-weekly dalbavancin versus daily conventional therapy for skin infection. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 5. 370(23):2169-79. [Medline].
SIVEXTRO (tedizolid phosphate) (for injection, for intravenous use; for oral use) [package insert]. Lexington, MA: Cubist Pharmaceuticals. 2014. Available at [Full Text].
Prokocimer P, De Anda C, Fang E, Mehra P, Das A. Tedizolid phosphate vs linezolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: the ESTABLISH-1 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013 Feb 13. 309(6):559-69. [Medline].
Moran GJ, Fang E, Corey GR, Das AF, De Anda C, Prokocimer P. Tedizolid for 6 days versus linezolid for 10 days for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ESTABLISH-2): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Aug. 14(8):696-705. [Medline].
Fritz SA, Long M, Gaebelein CJ, Martin MS, Hogan PG, Yetter J. Practices and procedures to prevent the transmission of skin and soft tissue infections in high school athletes. J Sch Nurs. 2012 Oct. 28(5):389-96. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Zinder SM, Basler RS, Foley J, Scarlata C, Vasily DB. National athletic trainers' association position statement: skin diseases. J Athl Train. 2010 Jul-Aug. 45(4):411-28. [Medline].
Likness LP. Common dermatologic infections in athletes and return-to-play guidelines. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011 Jun. 111(6):373-9. [Medline].
Steed LL, Costello J, Lohia S, Jones T, Spannhake EW, Nguyen S. Reduction of nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage in health care professionals by treatment with a nonantibiotic, alcohol-based nasal antiseptic. Am J Infect Control. 2014 Aug. 42(8):841-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].