eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Malignant Neoplasms

Basal Cell Carcinoma: Treatment & Medication

Author: Michael L Ramsey, MD, Director, Mohs Surgery Fellowship, Co-Director, Procedural Dermatology Fellowship, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Coauthor(s): Lindsay Dane Sewell, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Sep 11, 2009

Treatment

Medical Care

Local therapy with chemotherapeutic and immune-modulating agents is useful in some cases of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). In particular, small and superficial BCC may respond to these compounds. In addition, they may be used for prophylaxis or maintenance in patients who are prone to having many BCCs, such as those with basal cell nevus syndrome. See Medication. Also see the clinical guideline summary from the British Association of Dermatologists, Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma.12

Surgical Care

The goal of surgical treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is to destroy or remove the tumor so that no malignant tissue is allowed to proliferate further. Factors to consider when choosing therapy include the histologic subtype of BCC, the location and size of tumors, the age of the patient, the patient's ability to tolerate surgery, and the expense. Recurrent tumors are generally more aggressive than primary lesions, and subclinical extension also tends to be increased. Tumors that are aggressive and those occurring near vital or cosmetically sensitive structures are best treated with methods that allow for an examination of the tissue margins.
The most common surgical methods are curettage, excision with margin examination, Mohs micrographic surgery, and radiotherapy. Additionally, cryotherapy is sometimes used to treat these tumors (see Media File 9).

Postoperative wound after Mohs micrographic surge...

Postoperative wound after Mohs micrographic surgery demonstrates extensive subclinical involvement typical of many infiltrating and morpheaform basal cell carcinomas.

Postoperative wound after Mohs micrographic surge...

Postoperative wound after Mohs micrographic surgery demonstrates extensive subclinical involvement typical of many infiltrating and morpheaform basal cell carcinomas.


  • Curettage (usually with electrodesiccation) for basal cell carcinoma13
    • A looped blade (curette) is used to vigorously scrape tumor away from adjacent normal skin. One may start with a larger curette to debulk the tumor and then follow with a smaller curette to better remove smaller fragments of tumor from surrounding stroma. This technique works best in nodular or superficial BCC because these tumors tend to be friable and do not tend to be embedded in fibrous stroma. The instrument is applied firmly and used in multiple directions over the tumor and immediately adjacent skin. Curetting is most often followed by electrodesiccation, and the entire process may be repeated 1-2 more times. If electrodesiccation is not performed, vigorous and firm scraping in several directions is especially important. Many recurrences after curettage are believed to be due to insufficient aggressiveness on the part of the surgeon. The overall cure rate exceeds 90% for low-risk BCCs. The method is quick, simple, and less expensive than most other methods.
    • Curettage is a blind technique in which the specimen cannot be examined for margin control. This lack of microscopic margin control limits the usefulness of curettage in high-risk areas, such as the face and ears. Furthermore, the aggressive subtypes of BCC, such as morpheaform, infiltrating, micronodular, and recurrent tumors, are usually not friable and therefore unlikely to be removed by using the curette. The success of this treatment, even in nonaggressive tumors in low-risk sites, highly depends on the operator's experience and technique. Finally, healing by secondary intention (granulation) often leads to atrophic, white scars that may not be satisfactory in aesthetically important areas.
  • Surgical excision for basal cell carcinoma14
    • One may surgically excise the clinically apparent tumor and a margin of clinically normal–appearing skin. This method can usually be performed in an ambulatory setting and provides the pathologist with a specimen to examine the tissue margins. Healing time is generally shorter with sutured closure than with granulation, and cosmesis compares favorably with that of curettage.
    • Surgical excision is more time-consuming and costly than curettage. In addition, this method requires sacrifice of normal tissue to obtain acceptable cure rates. Margins of at least 4 mm are needed, even with the least aggressive BCCs, to achieve 95% cure rates. If standard bread-loaf tissue sectioning is used, areas of margin involvement may be missed under microscopy because only a small sampling of the specimen is evaluated.
  • Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma15,16
    • Mohs surgery involves removal of the clinically apparent tumor and a thin rim of normal-appearing skin around the defect. This saucer-shaped tissue specimen represents tissue adjacent to the tumor or the margin surrounding the tumor. This margin specimen is sectioned and marked so that the entirety of the undersurface and outer edges of the tumor are examined microscopically to minimize sampling error. Use of the frozen-section technique allows for an examination of tissue while the patient is in the office. Tissue is mapped microscopically so if any foci of tumor persist, further excision can be directed to only those areas to spare the normal tissue.
    • With the Mohs technique, almost 100% of the tissue margins are examined, compared with standard vertical (bread-loaf) sectioning, in which less than 1% of the outer margins are examined. Because relatively thin layers are taken only in areas of proven tumor, this technique is tissue sparing. Excision and repair can usually be performed on the same day. Of most importance, Mohs micrographic surgical excision has the best long-term cure rates of any treatment modality for BCC. Cure rates for primary BCC are 98-99% with Mohs excision and 94-96% for recurrent BCC.
    • Massive, invasive BCC tumors may sometimes be treated with Mohs surgery to clear peripheral margins with deeper aspects treated surgically by other disciplines.17
    • Chief disadvantages of Mohs surgery are its increased expense and time requirement compared with curettage. Mohs excision compares favorably with standard surgical excision when one factors in the savings of treating fewer recurrences with this technique.
  • Radiation therapy for basal cell carcinoma18
    • Radiation therapy is effective as primary treatment for a variety of BCCs. For most BCCs, cure rates approach 90%. It is especially useful for patients who cannot easily tolerate surgery, such as elderly or debilitated individuals. Irradiation can also be a useful adjunct when patients have aggressive tumors that were treated surgically or when surgery has failed to clear the margins of the tumor. Radiation is also an excellent option in patients who refuse surgery because of the size of a lesion or its proximity to vital structures.
    • Initial cosmetic results tend to be good, and this therapy can be less disfiguring than surgical excision. However, long-term results after several years can be deforming. Another disadvantage of this technique is that surgical margins cannot be examined. Tumors recurring in previously radiated sites tend to be aggressive and difficult to treat and reconstruct. Radiation therapy remains an important, feasible option in selected patients with BCC.
  • Cryotherapy for basal cell carcinoma
    • Cryotherapy is also an effective treatment for most nonaggressive BCCs, with cure rates near 90%. However, successful treatment is highly dependent on the experience of the operator. Optimal cure rates are obtained when the depth, duration, and temperature of treatment are measured with special instrumentation, such as cryoprobes.
    • Patients must be willing to endure the immediate posttreatment swelling, resultant necrosis of treated areas, and unpredictable scarring that can occur with this approach.
    • This method is not commonly used for the treatment of BCC, except by a few experienced cryosurgeons.

Medication

Imiquimod 5% cream19 has been used successfully to treat superficial basal cell carcinomas (BCCs).19,20,21,22 Although its exact mode of action in treating BCC is not known, a few suggested mechanisms follow. Lymphocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages may be recruited into the area of imiquimod application. These cells may be activated via toll-like receptors 7 and 8 (both of which recognize imiquimod as a ligand) to release cytokines, particularly tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-alpha, and interleukin 6. Antitumor effects, such as apoptosis, may then proceed, thereby inducing tumor regression.23 Induction of tumor suppressor function via the Notch signaling pathway in superficial BCCs has also been suggested as a mechanism of imiquimod.21,24  
 
The current recommended dosing frequency for the treatment of superficial BCC is 5 times per week for 6 weeks, but the frequency and duration should be tailored to the individual patient's response and ability to tolerate the medication. Many application schedules have been used, ranging from 3 times per week to twice daily 7 d/wk. The duration of treatment varies from 6-16 weeks. Superficial BCC cure rates of 70-100% should be expected after a 6-week course of 5-times-per-week application, as shown in studies. Topical imiquimod has also been used to treat small, nodular BCCs in low-risk locations, but cure rates have been lower than those with superficial BCCs.

Although successful use of imiquimod in immunosuppressed populations (eg, transplantation patients) without systemic complications has been documented, it has not been widely studied, nor have safety and efficacy been established. Imiquimod should be used cautiously in patients with autoimmune disease. Additionally, its high cost may prohibit its use in some patients.
 
Topical 5-fluorouracil 5% cream25 is sometimes used to treat small, superficial BCCs. It is a fluorinated pyrimidine that "blocks the methylation reaction of deoxyuridylic acid to thymidylic acid. In this manner fluorouracil interferes with the synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and to a lesser extent inhibits the formation of ribonucleic acid (RNA). Since DNA and RNA are essential for cell division and growth, the effect of fluorouracil may be to create a thymine deficiency which provokes unbalanced growth and death of the cell."
 
In properly selected (eg, thin) tumors, cure rates of approximately 80% have been obtained. It is generally applied twice daily and must be used for at least 6 weeks for the treatment of superficial BCC. Percutaneous absorption of 5-fluorouracil is its major limiting factor; it penetrates only 1 mm into the skin. New vehicles that may enhance absorption of 5-fluorouracil are being investigated.

One advantage of 5-fluorouracil use is that it can act on BCCs that are not large enough to be seen with the unaided eye. Therefore, it may be used in patients with basal cell nevus syndrome or in individuals prone to develop many BCCs to preemptively treat subclinical tumors. Patients with BCCs that are treated with 5-fluorouracil should be monitored carefully because not all tumors completely respond. Cosmetic results tend to range from good to excellent with the use of 5-fluorouracil. Although it is not inexpensive, it does cost less than imiquimod.

Interferon alfa-2b has shown some success in treating small (<1 cm), nodular, and superficial BCCs. It is administered intralesionally, 3 times per week for 3 weeks. The recommended dose is 1.5 million units per injection (total of 13.5 million U). In appropriate BCC tumors, cures rates of up to 80% have been obtained. Interferon has not become a mainstay in BCC treatment because of its cost, the inconvenience of multiple visits, the discomfort of administration, and its adverse effects. Flulike symptoms, which are dose related, are common with the doses administered to treat BCCs. Cardiovascular, myelodepressive, and neurologic adverse effects are less common with this treatment than with others. Because interferon is an immune stimulant, it should not be used to treat BCC in transplant recipients or in individuals with autoimmune diseases.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) for BCCs has been used for more than 20 years.26 PDT is the process of using specific wavelengths of light to photoexcite porphyrins that have been applied to neoplastic and preneoplastic cells. This increased energy is rapidly absorbed by adjacent tissue oxygen, causing the formation of singlet oxygen radicals. These radicals rapidly react with adjacent tissue and destroy it. 5-Aminolevulinic acid (ALA-PDT) is the only US Food and Drug Administration approved photoreactive molecule for PDT in the United States, and it is only approved for actinic keratoses. It is photoactivated with blue light for 1000 seconds after 1 hour of incubation.

Although its use is off label, PDT has been used for treatment and prevention of BCCs, including patients with immunosuppression and nevoid BCC syndrome. Shallow tumors, such as superficial BCCs, respond most consistently. Surgical excision has been shown to be significantly more effective than ALA-PDT in the treatment of nodular BCC.27 The strongest support for PDT as a modality for BCCs comes with data on thin lesions treated with methylaminolevulinate (used outside the United States), but at least one long-term follow-up trial has also shown surgical excision to be superior.28,29 Various protocols have been followed to achieve varying levels of success—increasing the incubation time, increasing occlusion time, and using longer and/or deeper-penetrating wavelengths of light (eg, red light or pulse-dye laser). Many patients continue to prefer PDT because of its short healing time, excellent cosmesis, and relative affordability.

Also see the British Association of Dermatologists Therapy Guidelines and Audit Subcommittee’s clinical guidelines summary, Guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy: update.30

Antineoplastic agents

Topical or intralesional antineoplastic agents may be administered depending on the type, location, and stage of the basal cell carcinoma (BCC).


5-Fluorouracil (Efudex, Carac, Fluoroplex)

Used topically to manage superficial BCC (not on head or neck). Interferes with DNA synthesis by blocking methylation of deoxyuridylic acid and inhibiting thymidylate synthetase and, subsequently, cell proliferation.

Adult

Apply bid in amount sufficient to cover lesions; apply for at least 3 wk; only 5% strength recommended; therapy might be required for up to 10-12 wk

Pediatric

Not established

Documented hypersensitivity, potentially serious infections

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Inflammatory reactions can occur with occlusive dressings; porous gauze dressing can be applied for cosmetic reasons without increase in reaction


Imiquimod (Aldara)

Precise mechanism for superficial BCC unknown. May increase tumor infiltration of lymphocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages. Indicated for biopsy-confirmed primary superficial BCC (not on head or neck) in adults with normal immune systems. Tumors must not be >2 cm in diameter on certain areas of body. Indicated only when surgical methods not appropriate.

Adult

Apply cream to treatment area (including 1 cm of skin around tumor) 5 d/wk at bedtime for 6 wk; leave on for 8 h, then wash area

Pediatric

Not established

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Medical follow-up essential to ensure adequate response; may cause redness, swelling, and sore at application site; may cause itching or burning


Interferon alfa-2b (Intron A)

Protein product manufactured with recombinant DNA technology. Mechanism of antitumor activity not clearly understood; however, direct antiproliferative effects against malignant cells and modulation of host immune response may be important. Investigational use for nodular BCC. Used in a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study (172 subjects). Intralesional injections of 1.5 million U administered 3 times/wk for 3 wk yielded 86% complete-response rate; 29% for placebo. Study included nodular BCCs; similar study did not show efficacy for morpheaform or aggressive BCCs.

Adult

1.5 million U intralesional injection 3 times/wk for 3 wk

Pediatric

Not established

Potential risk of renal failure when administered concurrently with interleukin 2; theophylline may increase toxicity by reducing clearance; cimetidine may increase antitumor effects; zidovudine and vinblastine may increase toxicity

Documented hypersensitivity; anaphylactic sensitivity to mouse immunoglobulin, egg protein, or neomycin; autoimmune hepatitis

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Depression and suicidal ideation may be adverse effects; severe or fatal GI hemorrhage infrequently reported; before therapy, perform tests to quantitate peripheral blood hemoglobin, platelets, granulocytes, hairy cells, and bone marrow hairy cells; monitor periodically (eg, monthly) during treatment to determine response; if no response within 6 mo, discontinue; if response occurs, continue until no further improvement observed; benefit of continued treatment after that time unknown

More on Basal Cell Carcinoma

Overview: Basal Cell Carcinoma
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Basal Cell Carcinoma
Treatment & Medication: Basal Cell Carcinoma
Follow-up: Basal Cell Carcinoma
Multimedia: Basal Cell Carcinoma
References

References

  1. Bale AE, Yu KP. The hedgehog pathway and basal cell carcinomas. Hum Mol Genet. Apr 2001;10(7):757-62. [Medline].

  2. Wicking C, McGlinn E. The role of hedgehog signalling in tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett. Nov 8 2001;173(1):1-7. [Medline].

  3. National Center for Biotechnical Information. Tumor Protein p53; TP53. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/dispomim.cgi?id=191170. Accessed November 7, 2007.

  4. Betti R, Radaelli G, Mussino F, Menni S, Crosti C. Anatomic location and histopathologic subtype of basal cell carcinomas in adults younger than 40 or 90 and older: any difference?. Dermatol Surg. Feb 2009;35(2):201-6. [Medline].

  5. Griffin JR, Cohen PR, Tschen JA, et al. Basal cell carcinoma in childhood: case report and literature review. J Am Acad Dermatol. Nov 2007;57(5 Suppl):S97-102. [Medline].

  6. Klein RD, Dykas DJ, Bale AE. Clinical testing for the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome in a DNA diagnostic laboratory. Genet Med. Nov-Dec 2005;7(9):611-9. [Medline].

  7. National Center for Biotechnical Information. Bazex Syndrome; BZX. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/dispomim.cgi?id=301845. Accessed November 7, 2007.

  8. Michaëlsson G, Olsson E, Westermark P. The Rombo syndrome: a familial disorder with vermiculate atrophoderma, milia, hypotrichosis, trichoepitheliomas, basal cell carcinomas and peripheral vasodilation with cyanosis. Acta Derm Venereol. 1981;61(6):497-503. [Medline].

  9. Karagas MR. Occurrence of cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell malignancies among those with a prior history of skin cancer. The Skin Cancer Prevention Study Group. J Invest Dermatol. Jun 1994;102(6):10S-13S. [Medline].

  10. [Guideline] U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for skin cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. Feb 3 2009;150(3):188-93. [Medline].

  11. [Guideline] From L, Marrett L, Rosen C, et al. Screening for skin cancer: a clinical practice guideline. National Guidelines Clearinghouse. Jun 2007.

  12. [Guideline] Telfer NR, Colver GB, Morton CA. Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. Jul 2008;159(1):35-48. [Medline].

  13. Silverman MK, Kopf AW, Grin CM, Bart RS, Levenstein MJ. Recurrence rates of treated basal cell carcinomas. Part 2: Curettage-electrodesiccation. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Sep 1991;17(9):720-6. [Medline].

  14. Silverman MK, Kopf AW, Bart RS, Grin CM, Levenstein MS. Recurrence rates of treated basal cell carcinomas. Part 3: Surgical excision. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Jun 1992;18(6):471-6. [Medline].

  15. Bennett RG. Current concepts in Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Clin. Oct 1991;9(4):777-88. [Medline].

  16. Roenigk RK. Mohs' micrographic surgery. Mayo Clin Proc. Feb 1988;63(2):175-83. [Medline].

  17. Ducic Y, Marra DE, Kennard C. Initial Mohs surgery followed by planned surgical resection of massive cutaneous carcinomas of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. Apr 2009;119(4):774-7. [Medline].

  18. Silverman MK, Kopf AW, Gladstein AH, Bart RS, Grin CM, Levenstein MJ. Recurrence rates of treated basal cell carcinomas. Part 4: X-ray therapy. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Jul 1992;18(7):549-54. [Medline].

  19. Aldara cream 5% (imiquimod) [package insert]. Graceway Pharmaceuticals; 2007.

  20. Geisse J, Caro I, Lindholm J, Golitz L, Stampone P, Owens M. Imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma: results from two phase III, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. May 2004;50(5):722-33. [Medline].

  21. Sapijaszko MJ. Imiquimod 5% cream (Aldara) in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Skin Therapy Lett. Jul-Aug 2005;10(6):2-5. [Medline][Full Text].

  22. Micali M, Nasca MR, Musumeci ML. Treatment of an extensive superficial basal cell carcinoma of the face with imiquimod 5% cream. Int J Tissue React. 2005;27(3):111-4. [Medline].

  23. Bilu D, Sauder DN. Imiquimod: modes of action. Br J Dermatol. Nov 2003;149 Suppl 66:5-8. [Medline].

  24. Wuest M, Dummer R, Urosevic M. Induction of the members of Notch pathway in superficial basal cell carcinomas treated with imiquimod. Arch Dermatol Res. Dec 2007;299(10):493-8. [Medline].

  25. Efudex (fluorouracil) [package insert]. Valeant Pharmaceuticals; 2005.

  26. Braathen LR, Szeimies RM, Basset-Seguin N, et al. Guidelines on the use of photodynamic therapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer: an international consensus. International Society for Photodynamic Therapy in Dermatology, 2005. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jan 2007;56(1):125-43. [Medline].

  27. Mosterd K, Thissen MR, Nelemans P, et al. Fractionated 5-aminolaevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy vs. surgical excision in the treatment of nodular basal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. Sep 2008;159(4):864-70. [Medline].

  28. Rhodes LE, de Rie MA, Leifsdottir R, et al. Five-year follow-up of a randomized, prospective trial of topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy vs surgery for nodular basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. Sep 2007;143(9):1131-6. [Medline].

  29. Rhodes LE, de Rie MA, Leifsdottir R, et al. Five-year follow-up of a randomized, prospective trial of topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy vs surgery for nodular basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. Sep 2007;143(9):1131-6. [Medline].

  30. [Guideline] Morton CA, McKenna KE, Rhodes LE, et al. Guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy: update. Br J Dermatol. Dec 2008;159(6):1245-66. [Medline].

  31. Brodland DG. Diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Clin Dermatol. Nov-Dec 1995;13(6):551-7. [Medline].

  32. Frankel DH, Hanusa BH, Zitelli JA. New primary nonmelanoma skin cancer in patients with a history of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Implications and recommendations for follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. May 1992;26(5 Pt 1):720-6. [Medline].

  33. Fritsch P. Dermatologie und Venerologie. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2004.

  34. Goldman L, Gregory RO, La Plant M. Preliminary investigative studies with PDT in dermatologic and plastic surgery. Lasers Surg Med. 1985;5(5):453-6. [Medline].

  35. Kirkham N. Tumors and cysts of the epidermis. In: Elder D, Elenitas R, Jaworsky C, Johnson B, eds. Lever's Histopathology of the Skin. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:719-46.

  36. Lang PG, Maize JC. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Friedman RJ, Rigel, Kopf AW, Harris MN, Baker D, eds. Cancer of the Skin. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1991:35-73.

  37. Lowe L. Histology: basal cell carcinoma. In: Maloney ME, Miller SJ, eds. Cutaneous Oncology. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science; 1998:633-45.

  38. Maloney ME, Miller SJ. Aggressive versus nonaggressive subtypes: basal cell carcinoma. In: Maloney ME, Miller SJ, eds. Cutaneous Oncology. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science; 1998:609-13.

  39. Miller DL, Weinstock MA. Nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States: incidence. J Am Acad Dermatol. May 1994;30(5 Pt 1):774-8. [Medline].

  40. Miller SJ. Pathogenesis: basal cell carcinoma. In: Maloney ME, Miller SJ, eds. Cutaneous Oncology. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science; 1998:581-5.

  41. Nguyen TH, Ho DQ. Nonmelanoma skin cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. Jun 2002;3(3):193-203. [Medline].

  42. Pasca di Magliano M, Hebrok M. Hedgehog signalling in cancer formation and maintenance. Nat Rev Cancer. Dec 2003;3(12):903-11. [Medline].

  43. Poniecka AW, Alexis JB. An immunohistochemical study of basal cell carcinoma and trichoepithelioma. Am J Dermatopathol. Aug 1999;21(4):332-6. [Medline].

  44. Ponten F, Lundeberg J. Principles of Tumor Biology and Pathogensesis of BCCs and SCCs. In: Bolognia JL, et al, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. ed. China: Mosby; 2004:1663-76.

  45. Preston DS, Stern RS. Nonmelanoma cancers of the skin. N Engl J Med. Dec 3 1992;327(23):1649-62. [Medline].

  46. Ratner D, Skouge JW. Surgical management of local disease: basal cell carcinoma. In: Maloney ME, Miller SJ, eds. Cutaneous Oncology. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science; 1998:664-71.

  47. Robinson JK. What are adequate treatment and follow-up care for nonmelanoma cutaneous cancer?. Arch Dermatol. Mar 1987;123(3):331-3. [Medline].

  48. Rubin AI, Chen EH, Ratner D. Basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Nov 24 2005;353(21):2262-9. [Medline].

  49. Silverman MK, Kopf AW, Grin CM, Bart RS, Levenstein MJ. Recurrence rates of treated basal cell carcinomas. Part 1: Overview. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Sep 1991;17(9):713-8. [Medline].

  50. Tope WD, Shaffer JJ. Photodynamic Therapy. In: Bolognia JL, et al, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. ed. China: Mosby; 2004:2127-40.

  51. Tromovitch TA, Stegeman SJ. Microscopically controlled excision of skin tumors. Arch Dermatol. Aug 1974;110(2):231-2. [Medline].

Further Reading

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Michael L Ramsey, MD, Director, Mohs Surgery Fellowship, Co-Director, Procedural Dermatology Fellowship, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Michael L Ramsey, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology, and American Society for Dermatologic Surgery
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Lindsay Dane Sewell, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Lindsay Dane Sewell, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

R Stan Taylor, MD, Professor of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Director of Skin Surgery and Oncology Clinic, Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
R Stan Taylor, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Surgery, American Dermatological Association, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Christian Medical & Dental Society, and Society for Investigative Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

David F Butler, MD, Professor of Dermatology, Texas A&M University College of Medicine; Chair, Department of Dermatology, Director, Dermatology Residency Training Program, Scott and White Clinic, Northside Clinic
David F Butler, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, American Society for MOHS Surgery, Association of Military Dermatologists, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Edward F Chan, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Edward F Chan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American Society of Dermatopathology, and Society for Investigative Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Catherine M Quirk, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania
Catherine M Quirk, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Dirk M Elston, MD, Director, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.