eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Malignant Neoplasms

Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Differential Diagnoses & Workup

Author: Debjani Sahni, MBBS, MRCP, Cutaneous Oncology Fellow, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Coauthor(s): Chrysalyne D Schmults, MD, Instructor in Dermatology, Harvard Medical School; Director, Mohs Micrographic Surgery Center, Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Mar 18, 2009

Differential Diagnoses

Actinic Keratosis
Warts, Genital
Atypical Fibroxanthoma
Warts, Nongenital
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Keratoacanthoma
Pyoderma Gangrenosum

Workup

Imaging Studies

Imaging is not routinely indicated for diagnosing cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, radiologic imaging should be obtained in patients with regional lymphadenopathy and/or neurologic symptoms suggestive of perineural involvement. CT scanning, MRI, ultrasonography, or positron-emission tomography (PET) scanning may be used depending on the specific question being addressed, although the selection of one modality over another is often based on clinician and institutional preference. Currently, no formal guidelines regarding the use of radiologic imaging in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma have been developed.

Disease staging workup in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma

  • Physical examination of lymph nodes: In all squamous cell carcinoma patients, the draining nodal basins should be palpated. If nodes are palpable, a biopsy should be performed using FNA or excision. If lymph nodes are clinically negative but the tumor meets high-risk criteria, little data are available to guide what should be done next. Subsequently, management currently varies with regard to further staging.32,33 See "High-risk squamous cell carcinoma" in Prognosis.
  • Radiologic staging
    • Only a few studies have reported on the utility of radiologic imaging in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. One study of MRI and CT scanning in patients with histologically proven perineurally invasive squamous cell carcinoma showed only 20% of asymptomatic patients to have positive findings discovered from imaging studies. Thus, CT scanning and MRI appear to be poor in detecting asymptomatic nerve involvement. However, positive imaging findings did correlate with worse outcomes. The 5-year survival rate was 50% if CT scanning or MRI findings were positive, versus 86% if they were negative.34
    • Two studies reported on radiologic imaging for detecting subclinical nodal metastasis.35 The first, a study of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma, indicated that ultrasonography followed by FNA for suspicious nodes was superior to CT scanning in staging subclinical nodal metastasis, with ultrasound-guided FNA demonstrating 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The second is a small study of PET scanning in 9 patients with high-risk squamous cell carcinoma. PET scanning detected subclinical nodal metastasis in 3 of 9 patients.36 Thus, PET scanning and ultrasound-guided FNA may be capable of detecting many cases of subclinical nodal metastasis. 
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB): A review of the 85 reported cases of SLNB in high-risk, nonanogenital cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma showed that 21% of cases were positive based on SLNB findings. This indicates that SLNB likely can detect many cases of subclinical nodal metastasis. How the sensitivity of SLNB compares with that of PET scanning or ultrasound-guided FNA and whether detection of subclinical nodal metastasis impacts survival are unknown. However, because the 5-year survival rate of patients with nodal metastasis is as high as 73% with aggressive treatment,14 early detection of nodal metastasis may prove more beneficial in squamous cell carcinoma than in melanoma.
  • Summary: Little data are available to guide decisions about staging of nodal basins in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma. However, PET scanning, ultrasound-guided FNA, and SLNB all appear to offer a good chance of detecting subclinical nodal metastasis with low morbidity. Thus, nodal staging may be considered in patients with high-risk squamous cell carcinoma. Development of prognostic models that better predict the risk of nodal metastasis will allow for more rational decisions about which patients should undergo nodal staging.

Procedures

Skin biopsy

Although the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma is often strongly suspected based on clinical findings, a skin biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis. A shave biopsy, punch biopsy, incisional biopsy, or excisional biopsy may be used. The biopsy is routinely performed in the physician's office after the patient is given a local anesthetic.

All skin biopsy samples obtained to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma must reach at least the depth of the mid dermis to allow for a determination of the presence or absence of invasive disease. For high-risk lesions, a larger sample may be helpful to assess for perineural invasion and other histologic features that confer a greater risk of metastasis. Given recent information about depth being an important prognostic factor (analogous to melanoma), a large punch biopsy through the center of the lesion or excisional biopsy may be best, particularly in high-risk lesions or immunosuppressed patients.37

Pathologic analyses may be completed by a dermatologist or a general pathologist, but they are preferably completed by a dermatopathologist with extensive experience in squamous cell carcinoma.

Patients with regional lymphadenopathy identified by clinical examination or imaging studies should undergo a lymph node biopsy or FNA for histologic evaluation. SLNB has been used to identify micrometastasis in patients with high-risk squamous cell carcinoma and clinically negative nodes, with 21% positivity.38 While SLNB appears to be able to detect most subclinical metastasis, whether early detection of lymph node metastasis leads to enhanced survival in squamous cell carcinoma is unknown, because controlled studies have not been conducted. Complete lymphadenectomy of the draining nodal basin has also been suggested for high-risk tumors with an estimated metastatic risk of 20% or greater. However, because prognostic models do not exist, knowing precisely which patients fall into this category is difficult. Thus, when it is feasible, SLNB offers a low-morbidity approach to accurately staging high-risk squamous cell carcinoma.

Histologic Findings

The biopsy report for squamous cell carcinoma often carries prognostic implications. Recognizing the implications of the various histologic subtypes of squamous cell carcinoma is important, and the astute clinician uses his or her understanding of histopathology to advantage in planning the appropriate therapeutic intervention.

Squamous cell carcinoma in situ is characterized by an intraepidermal proliferation of atypical keratinocytes. Hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and confluent parakeratosis are seen within the epidermis, and the keratinocytes lie in complete disorder, resulting in the classic "windblown" appearance. Cellular atypia, including pleomorphism, hyperchromatic nuclei, and mitoses, is prominent. Atypical keratinocytes may be found in the basal layer and often extend deeply down hair follicles, but they do not invade the dermis.

The main feature that distinguishes invasive squamous cell carcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma in situ is invasion of malignant keratinocytes through the basement membrane and into the dermis. Keratinization results in the production of squamous eddies or keratin pearls. The neoplastic cells may demonstrate varying degrees of squamous differentiation and atypia. If the tumor is poorly differentiated, this fact is typically reported by the dermatopathologist because the degree of differentiation has prognostic implications (ie, poorly differentiated tumors have been associated with a higher risk of metastasis).

Several variants of squamous cell carcinoma can be distinguished by clinical and/or histologic criteria. In some cases, these tumors may be difficult to distinguish from other malignancies based on routine histology findings alone. Therefore, immunohistochemical staining with antibodies to cytokeratins and epithelial membrane antigen is often used to confirm the epithelial (ie, keratinocyte) origin of the tumor. The salient features of keratoacanthoma, spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma, acantholytic (adenoid) squamous cell carcinoma, and verrucous carcinoma are highlighted in the following table.
 
Histologic and Clinical Features of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Variants 

Open table in new window

Table
Tumor
Histologic Characteristics
Clinical Characteristics
Keratoacanthoma
Keratin-filled crater
Well-differentiated (mild atypia)
Neutrophil microabscesses
Eosinophils in dermal infiltrate
Solitary nodule
Central craterlike depression
Rapid growth
May spontaneously involute
Spindle cell SCC
Atypical spindle cells
Foci of squamous differentiation
May resemble other spindle cell tumors (eg, atypical fibroxanthoma)
Resembles typical SCC
May be clinically aggressive

Acantholytic (adenoid) SCC
Glandlike differentiation
Acantholysis
May resemble adenocarcinoma or sweat gland carcinoma
Arises on sun-damaged skin
Elderly patients
Resembles typical SCC
Clinically aggressive
Verrucous carcinoma
Well-differentiated (minimal atypia)
Resembles verruca
Bulbous downward proliferation
"Bulldozing" invasion
Oral, genital, or plantar foot
Indolent growth
Locally destructive
Rarely metastasizes
Sarcomatoid SCC
Poorly differentiated cells resembling sarcoma
Clinical appearance may be that of typical SCC or may have more nodular appearance with less surface change
Elevated risk of local recurrence and metastasis
Tumor
Histologic Characteristics
Clinical Characteristics
Keratoacanthoma
Keratin-filled crater
Well-differentiated (mild atypia)
Neutrophil microabscesses
Eosinophils in dermal infiltrate
Solitary nodule
Central craterlike depression
Rapid growth
May spontaneously involute
Spindle cell SCC
Atypical spindle cells
Foci of squamous differentiation
May resemble other spindle cell tumors (eg, atypical fibroxanthoma)
Resembles typical SCC
May be clinically aggressive

Acantholytic (adenoid) SCC
Glandlike differentiation
Acantholysis
May resemble adenocarcinoma or sweat gland carcinoma
Arises on sun-damaged skin
Elderly patients
Resembles typical SCC
Clinically aggressive
Verrucous carcinoma
Well-differentiated (minimal atypia)
Resembles verruca
Bulbous downward proliferation
"Bulldozing" invasion
Oral, genital, or plantar foot
Indolent growth
Locally destructive
Rarely metastasizes
Sarcomatoid SCC
Poorly differentiated cells resembling sarcoma
Clinical appearance may be that of typical SCC or may have more nodular appearance with less surface change
Elevated risk of local recurrence and metastasis

Staging

Squamous cell carcinoma is staged according to American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines, which use the TNM classification system. Most cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas are not metastatic at the time of presentation; therefore, the tumor stage in such cases is based solely on the characteristics of the primary lesion. Staging of metastatic disease takes into account the presence or absence of regional lymph node and distant metastasis. The staging system is currently being updated to incorporate more information about tumor factors that impact prognosis. The new staging system will be available in 2010. Meanwhile, current classification of the primary tumor is described below.

  • TX - Primary tumor cannot be assessed
  • T0 - No evidence of primary tumor
  • Tis - Carcinoma in situ
  • T1 - Tumor less than 2 cm in greatest diameter
  • T2 - Tumor 2-5 cm in greatest diameter
  • T3 - Tumor greater than 5 cm in greatest diameter
  • T4 - Tumor with deep invasion into cartilage, muscle, or bone

More on Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Overview: Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Treatment & Medication: Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Follow-up: Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Multimedia: Squamous Cell Carcinoma
References

References

  1. Johnson TM, Rowe DE, Nelson BR, Swanson NA. Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (excluding lip and oral mucosa). J Am Acad Dermatol. Mar 1992;26(3 Pt 2):467-84. [Medline].

  2. Leiter U, Garbe C. Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer--the role of sunlight. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;624:89-103. [Medline].

  3. Masini C, Fuchs PG, Gabrielli F, et al. Evidence for the association of human papillomavirus infection and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in immunocompetent individuals. Arch Dermatol. Jul 2003;139(7):890-4. [Medline].

  4. Wong SS, Tan KC, Goh CL. Cutaneous manifestations of chronic arsenicism: review of seventeen cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 1998;38(2 Pt 1):179-85. [Medline].

  5. Herman S, Rogers HD, Ratner D. Immunosuppression and squamous cell carcinoma: a focus on solid organ transplant recipients. Skinmed. Sep-Oct 2007;6(5):234-8. [Medline].

  6. Mehrany K, Weenig RH, Pittelkow MR, Roenigk RK, Otley CC. High recurrence rates of squamous cell carcinoma after Mohs' surgery in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2005;31(1):38-42; discussion 42. [Medline].

  7. Nguyen P, Vin-Christian K, Ming ME, Berger T. Aggressive squamous cell carcinomas in persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Arch Dermatol. Jun 2002;138(6):758-63. [Medline].

  8. Mallipeddi R. Epidermolysis bullosa and cancer. Clin Exp Dermatol. Nov 2002;27(8):616-23. [Medline].

  9. Newman MD, Weinberg JM. Topical therapy in the treatment of actinic keratosis and basal cell carcinoma. Cutis. Apr 2007;79(4 Suppl):18-28. [Medline].

  10. Miller DL, Weinstock MA. Nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States: incidence. J Am Acad Dermatol. May 1994;30(5 Pt 1):774-8. [Medline].

  11. Gray DT, Suman VJ, Su WP, Clay RP, Harmsen WS, Roenigk RK. Trends in the population-based incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin first diagnosed between 1984 and 1992. Arch Dermatol. Jun 1997;133(6):735-40. [Medline].

  12. Hampton T. Skin cancer's ranks rise: immunosuppression to blame. JAMA. Sep 28 2005;294(12):1476-80. [Medline].

  13. Buettner PG, Raasch BA. Incidence rates of skin cancer in Townsville, Australia. Int J Cancer. Nov 23 1998;78(5):587-93. [Medline].

  14. Veness MJ, Morgan GJ, Palme CE, Gebski V. Surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to lymph nodes: combined treatment should be considered best practice. Laryngoscope. May 2005;115(5):870-5. [Medline].

  15. McCall CO, Chen SC. Squamous cell carcinoma of the legs in African Americans. J Am Acad Dermatol. Oct 2002;47(4):524-9. [Medline].

  16. Williams LS, Mancuso AA, Mendenhall WM. Perineural spread of cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinoma: CT and MR detection and its impact on patient management and prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Mar 15 2001;49(4):1061-9. [Medline].

  17. de Gruijl FR, Rebel H. Early events in UV carcinogenesis--DNA damage, target cells and mutant p53 foci. Photochem Photobiol. Mar-Apr 2008;84(2):382-7. [Medline].

  18. Katiyar SK. UV-induced immune suppression and photocarcinogenesis: chemoprevention by dietary botanical agents. Cancer Lett. 2007;255:1-11. [Medline].

  19. Ziegler A, Jonason AS, Leffell DJ, et al. Sunburn and p53 in the onset of skin cancer. Nature. Dec 22-29 1994;372(6508):773-6. [Medline].

  20. Brown VL, Harwood CA, Crook T, Cronin JG, Kelsell DP, Proby CM. p16INK4a and p14ARF tumor suppressor genes are commonly inactivated in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. May 2004;122(5):1284-92. [Medline].

  21. Ziegler A, Jonason AS, Leffell DJ, et al. Sunburn and p53 in the onset of skin cancer. Nature. Dec 22-29 1994;372(6508):773-6. [Medline].

  22. Perry PK, Silverberg NB. Cutaneous malignancy in albinism. Cutis. May 2001;67(5):427-30. [Medline].

  23. Karagas MR, Nelson HH, Zens MS, et al. Squamous cell and basal cell carcinoma of the skin in relation to radiation therapy and potential modification of risk by sun exposure. Epidemiology. Nov 2007;18(6):776-84. [Medline].

  24. Zghal M, El-Fekih N, Fazaa B, et al. [Xeroderma pigmentosum. Cutaneous, ocular, and neurologic abnormalities in 49 Tunisian cases]. Tunis Med. Dec 2005;83(12):760-3. [Medline].

  25. Berg D, Otley CC. Skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jul 2002;47(1):1-17; quiz 18-20. [Medline].

  26. Black AP, Bailey A, Jones L, Turner RJ, Hollowood K, Ogg GS. p53-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in individuals with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. Nov 2005;153(5):987-91. [Medline].

  27. Alam M, Caldwell JB, Eliezri YD. Human papillomavirus-associated digital squamous cell carcinoma: literature review and report of 21 new cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mar 2003;48(3):385-93. [Medline].

  28. Della Torre G, Donghi R, Longoni A, et al. HPV DNA in intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma of the vulva and penis. Diagn Mol Pathol. Mar 1992;1(1):25-30. [Medline].

  29. Stockfleth E, Nindl I, Sterry W, Ulrich C, Schmook T, Meyer T. Human papillomaviruses in transplant-associated skin cancers. Dermatol Surg. Apr 2004;30(4 Pt 2):604-9. [Medline].

  30. Mallipeddi R, Keane FM, McGrath JA, Mayou BJ, Eady RA. Increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma in junctional epidermolysis bullosa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. Sep 2004;18(5):521-6. [Medline].

  31. Arbiser JL, Fan CY, Su X, et al. Involvement of p53 and p16 tumor suppressor genes in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa-associated squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. Oct 2004;123(4):788-90. [Medline].

  32. Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Hess S, Berg D, Schmults CD. Equipoise exists in the peri-operative management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion: A survey study of American College of Mohs Surgery surgeons. Manuscript under review.

  33. Hess SD, Jambusaria A, Katz K, Schmults CD. Clinical equipoise exists in the peri-operative management of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A survey study of American College of Mohs Surgery surgeons. Manuscript under review.

  34. Williams LS, Mancuso AA, Mendenhall WM. Perineural spread of cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinoma: CT and MR detection and its impact on patient management and prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Mar 15 2001;49(4):1061-9. [Medline].

  35. Land R, Herod J, Moskovic E, et al. Routine computerized tomography scanning, groin ultrasound with or without fine needle aspiration cytology in the surgical management of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Int J Gynecol Cancer. Jan-Feb 2006;16(1):312-7. [Medline].

  36. Cho SB, Chung WG, Yun M, Lee JD, Lee MG, Chung KY. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: retrospective analysis of 12 patients. Dermatol Surg. Apr 2005;31(4):442-6; discussion 446-7. [Medline].

  37. Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schonfisch B, et al. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. Aug 2008;9(8):713-20. [Medline].

  38. Ross AS, Schmults CD. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the English literature. Dermatol Surg. Nov 2006;32(11):1309-21. [Medline].

  39. Bargman H, Hochman J. Topical treatment of Bowen's disease with 5-Fluorouracil. J Cutan Med Surg. Mar-Apr 2003;7(2):101-5. [Medline].

  40. Mackenzie-Wood A, Kossard S, de Launey J, Wilkinson B, Owens ML. Imiquimod 5% cream in the treatment of Bowen's disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mar 2001;44(3):462-70. [Medline].

  41. Smith KJ, Hamza S, Skelton H. Topical imidazoquinoline therapy of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma polarizes lymphoid and monocyte/macrophage populations to a Th1 and M1 cytokine pattern. Clin Exp Dermatol. Sep 2004;29(5):505-12. [Medline].

  42. Marmur ES, Schmults CD, Goldberg DJ. A review of laser and photodynamic therapy for the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. Feb 2004;30(2 Pt 2):264-71. [Medline].

  43. Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Miller C, Quon H. Surgical monotherapy versus surgery plus radiotherapy in high risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review of outcomes. Dermatol Surg. In press.

  44. Wollina U, Hansel G, Koch A, Kostler E. Oral capecitabine plus subcutaneous interferon alpha in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. May 2005;131(5):300-4. [Medline].

  45. Otley CC, Cherikh WS, Salasche SJ, McBride MA, Christenson LJ, Kauffman HM. Skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: effect of pretransplant end-organ disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. Nov 2005;53(5):783-90. [Medline].

  46. Kuflik EG, Gage AA. The five-year cure rate achieved by cryosurgery for skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 1991;24(6 Pt 1):1002-4. [Medline].

  47. Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. Aug 1992;27(2 Pt 1):241-8. [Medline].

  48. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL Jr. Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 1992;26(6):976-90. [Medline].

  49. Holmkvist KA, Roenigk RK. Squamous cell carcinoma of the lip treated with Mohs micrographic surgery: outcome at 5 years. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 1998;38(6 Pt 1):960-6. [Medline].

  50. Robins P, Dzubow LM, Rigel DS. Squamous-cell carcinoma treated by Mohs' surgery: an experience with 414 cases in a period of 15 years. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Oct 1981;7(10):800-1. [Medline].

  51. Harwood CA, Leedham-Green M, Leigh IM, Proby CM. Low-dose retinoids in the prevention of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in organ transplant recipients: a 16-year retrospective study. Arch Dermatol. Apr 2005;141(4):456-64. [Medline].

  52. Tan PY, Ek E, Su S, Giorlando F, Dieu T. Incomplete excision of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: a prospective observational study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 15 2007;120(4):910-6. [Medline].

  53. Chen K, Craig JC, Shumack S. Oral retinoids for the prevention of skin cancers in solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Dermatol. Mar 2005;152(3):518-23. [Medline].

  54. Mrass P, Rendl M, Mildner M, et al. Retinoic acid increases the expression of p53 and proapoptotic caspases and sensitizes keratinocytes to apoptosis: a possible explanation for tumor preventive action of retinoids. Cancer Res. Sep 15 2004;64(18):6542-8. [Medline].

  55. Papoutsaki M, Lanza M, Marinari B, et al. The p73 gene is an anti-tumoral target of the RARbeta/gamma-selective retinoid tazarotene. J Invest Dermatol. Dec 2004;123(6):1162-8. [Medline].

  56. Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, et al. Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1 2005;23(4):759-65. [Medline].

  57. Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schonfisch B, et al. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. Aug 2008;9(8):713-20. [Medline].

  58. Ross AS , Miller F, Elenitsas R, Xu X, Troxel AB, Schmults CD. Diameter of involved nerves predicts outcome in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion: an investigative-blinded retrospective cohort study. Under review.

  59. Jensen P, Hansen S, Moller B, et al. Skin cancer in kidney and heart transplant recipients and different long-term immunosuppressive therapy regimens. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 1999;40(2 Pt 1):177-86. [Medline].

  60. Euvrard S, Kanitakis J, Decullier E, et al. Subsequent skin cancers in kidney and heart transplant recipients after the first squamous cell carcinoma. Transplantation. Apr 27 2006;81(8):1093-100. [Medline].

  61. Veness MJ, Quinn DI, Ong CS, et al. Aggressive cutaneous malignancies following cardiothoracic transplantation: the Australian experience. Cancer. Apr 15 1999;85(8):1758-64. [Medline].

  62. Mehrany K, Weenig RH, Pittelkow MR, Roenigk RK, Otley CC. High recurrence rates of squamous cell carcinoma after Mohs' surgery in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2005;31(1):38-42; discussion 42. [Medline].

  63. Frierson HF Jr, Deutsch BD, Levine PA. Clinicopathologic features of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Hum Pathol. Dec 1988;19(12):1397-402. [Medline].

  64. Lobo DV, Chu P, Grekin RC, Berger TG. Nonmelanoma skin cancers and infection with the human immunodeficiency virus. Arch Dermatol. May 1992;128(5):623-7. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

squamous cell carcinoma, skin cancer, SCC, actinic keratoses, SCC in situ, Bowen disease, Bowen's disease, keratotic invasive SCC, leukoplakia, erythroplasia of Queyrat, nodular SCC, periungual SCC, Marjolin ulcer, actinically derived SCC, adenoid squamous cell carcinoma, ASCC, adenosquamous cell carcinoma, verrucous carcinoma,  keratoacanthoma,  oral florid papillomatosis, epithelioma cuniculatum, giant condyloma of Buschke and Löwenstein, malignant tumor of keratinocytes, sun-induced cancerous lesions

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Debjani Sahni, MBBS, MRCP, Cutaneous Oncology Fellow, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Debjani Sahni, MBBS, MRCP is a member of the following medical societies: British Association of Dermatologists, Royal College of Physicians, and St John's Dermatological Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Chrysalyne D Schmults, MD, Instructor in Dermatology, Harvard Medical School; Director, Mohs Micrographic Surgery Center, Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Chrysalyne D Schmults, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, and International Society for Dermatologic Surgery
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

R Stan Taylor, MD, Professor of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Director of Skin Surgery and Oncology Clinic, Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
R Stan Taylor, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Surgery, American Dermatological Association, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Christian Medical & Dental Society, and Society for Investigative Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Michael J Wells, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Michael J Wells, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Mary Farley, MD, Dermatologic Surgeon/Mohs Surgeon, Anne Arundel Surgery Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Joel M Gelfand, MD, MSCE, Medical Director, Clinical Studies Unit, Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Associate Scholar, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania
Joel M Gelfand, MD, MSCE is a member of the following medical societies: Society for Investigative Dermatology
Disclosure: AMGEN Consulting fee Consulting; AMGEN Grant/research funds None; Genentech Consulting fee Consulting; Centocor Consulting fee Consulting; Centocor Grant/research funds None; Covance Consulting fee Consulting; Shire  Consulting

Chief Editor

Dirk M Elston, MD, Director, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.