eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Pediatric Diseases
Epidermolytic Hyperkeratosis (Bullous Congenital Ichthyosiform Erythroderma)
Updated: Jan 24, 2007
Introduction
Background
Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EHK) also is termed bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma. EHK is a rare autosomal dominant ichthyosis, yet a high frequency of spontaneous mutations (up to 50%) occurs. In 1902, Brocq first described it as bullous ichthyotic erythroderma to distinguish the entity from congenital ichthyotic erythroderma.
Pathophysiology
The defect is found in the genes for keratin 1 and keratin 10.
Keratins are divided into 2 classes including basic type II keratins and acidic type I keratins. Keratin 1 is one of the basic type II keratins found on chromosome 12; keratin 10 is one of the acidic type I keratins found on chromosome 17.
Keratins form intermediate filaments when both type I and type II keratins are present. This combination provides structural stability to keratinocytes. Keratins 1 and 10 are coexpressed and are involved in the suprabasilar differentiation of keratinocytes. A defect at this level (as in EHK) weakens the structural stability of the keratinocytes, causing easy blistering, hyperproliferation, and hyperkeratosis.
Frequency
United States
One case per 200,000-300,000 persons
International
Same as in United States
Mortality/Morbidity
- Mortality is possible if sepsis or electrolyte imbalance is not treated properly during the neonatal period.
- Morbidities include recurrent infection, sepsis, and electrolyte imbalance, which are possible during the neonatal period.
Race
No racial predilection is apparent.
Sex
No sex predilection is recognized.
Age
EHK is a lifelong condition with an onset at birth or in the neonatal period.
Clinical
History
EHK presents at birth or shortly thereafter as erythema, blistering, and/or peeling, but symptoms in some patients may ameliorate over time.
Physical
In 1994, DiGiovanna and Bale separated the various clinical presentations of EHK into 2 primary types, including NPS (without severe palm/sole hyperkeratosis) and PS (with severe palm/sole hyperkeratosis) based on the presence or absence of severe palmoplantar hyperkeratosis. The 2 primary types were subdivided further into 3 subtypes each depending on the clinical presentations. Some of the subtypes have general involvement, while others are localized only.
- NPS subtypes do not have severe palmoplantar involvement. Distinctions between the 3 NPS subtypes are based on different clinical presentations.
- NPS-1 has normal palmoplantar surfaces, no digital contractures, a hystrix scale, a generalized skin distribution, no history of erythroderma, a positive history of blistering, and patients may have abnormal gait.
- NPS-2 is similar to NPS-1. The only differences are a brown scale instead of a hystrix scale and a lack of gait abnormalities.
- NPS-3 has no palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, no digital contractures, and is generalized in skin distribution similar to NPS-1 and NPS-2. In contrast, the palmoplantar surface in NPS-3 is hyperlinear, has minimal scale, and a thin white scale is most prominent on the trunk. Erythroderma is mild to moderate. NPS-3 may have gait abnormalities similar to NPS-1.
- PS subtypes have severe palmoplantar involvement. The 3 subtypes are differentiated based on clinical presentations.
- PS-1 has smooth palmoplantar hyperkeratotic surfaces, no digital contractures, a localized distribution of skin involvement (limited flexural involvement, truncal sparing), no erythroderma, a localized blistering, and no gait abnormalities.
- PS-2 has smooth palmoplantar hyperkeratotic surfaces but has digital contractures, generalized skin involvement with hyperkeratosis most severe over the joints at both flexor and extensor surfaces, mild-to-moderate erythroderma, positive blistering, and may have gait abnormalities.
- PS-3 has cerebriform palmoplantar surfaces, no digital contractures, a tan scale, generalized skin involvement, no erythroderma, neonatal blistering, and no gait abnormalities.
Causes
Defects in genes for keratin 1 and 10 are the cause of EHK. Defects in keratin 1 are associated with the PS variants; defects in keratin 10 are associated with the NPS variants.
More on Epidermolytic Hyperkeratosis (Bullous Congenital Ichthyosiform Erythroderma) |
Overview: Epidermolytic Hyperkeratosis (Bullous Congenital Ichthyosiform Erythroderma) |
| Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Epidermolytic Hyperkeratosis (Bullous Congenital Ichthyosiform Erythroderma) |
| Treatment & Medication: Epidermolytic Hyperkeratosis (Bullous Congenital Ichthyosiform Erythroderma) |
| Follow-up: Epidermolytic Hyperkeratosis (Bullous Congenital Ichthyosiform Erythroderma) |
| Multimedia: Epidermolytic Hyperkeratosis (Bullous Congenital Ichthyosiform Erythroderma) |
| References |
| Next Page » |
References
Bale SJ, DiGiovanna JJ. Genetic approaches to understanding the keratinopathies. Adv Dermatol. 1997;12:99-113; discussion 114. [Medline].
DiGiovanna JJ, Bale SJ. Clinical heterogeneity in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Arch Dermatol. Aug 1994;130(8):1026-35. [Medline].
Kragballe K, Steijlen PM, Ibsen HH, et al. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of calcipotriol ointment in disorders of keratinization. Results of a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, right/left comparative study. Arch Dermatol. May 1995;131(5):556-60. [Medline].
Kwak J, Maverakis E. Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Dermatol Online J. 2006;12(5):6. [Medline].
Lacz NL, Schwartz RA, Kihiczak G. Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: a keratin 1 or 10 mutational event. Int J Dermatol. Jan 2005;44(1):1-6. [Medline].
Leigh IM, Lane EB. Mutations in the genes for epidermal keratins in epidermolysis bullosa and epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Arch Dermatol. Dec 1993;129(12):1571-7. [Medline].
Math A, Frank J, Handisurya A, et al. Identification of a de novo keratin 1 mutation in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis with palmoplantar involvement. Eur J Dermatol. Sep-Oct 2006;16(5):507-10. [Medline].
McGowan KA, Aradhya S, Fuchs H, et al. A mouse keratin 1 mutation causes dark skin and epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. J Invest Dermatol. May 2006;126(5):1013-6. [Medline].
Muller FB, Huber M, Kinaciyan T, et al. A human keratin 10 knockout causes recessive epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Hum Mol Genet. Apr 1 2006;15(7):1133-41. [Medline].
Rothnagel JA, Lin MT, Longley MA, et al. Prenatal diagnosis for keratin mutations to exclude transmission of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Prenat Diagn. Aug 1998;18(8):826-30. [Medline].
Smack DP, Korge BP, James WD. Keratin and keratinization. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jan 1994;30(1):85-102. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma
Overview: Epidermolytic Hyperkeratosis (Bullous Congenital Ichthyosiform Erythroderma)