eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Pediatric Diseases

Supernumerary Nipple

Aryeh Metzker, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatric Dermatology, Senior Clinical Lecturer, Department of Dermatology, Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University

Updated: Jun 26, 2008

Introduction

Background

Supernumerary nipples (SNs) are a common minor congenital malformation that consists of nipples and/or related tissue in addition to the 2 nipples normally appearing on the chest. SNs are located along the embryonic milk line. Ectopic SNs are found beyond the embryonic milk line. The embryonic milk line is the line of potentially appearing breast tissue as observed in many mammals. In humans, the embryonic milk line extends bilaterally from a point slightly beyond the axillae on the arms, down the chest and the abdomen toward the groin, and is generally thought to end at the proximal inner sides of the thighs, although SN has been described on the foot.¹ SNs can appear complete with breast tissue and ducts and are then referred to as polymastia, or they can appear partially with either of the tissues involved.

The classification established by Kajava in 1915 is still valid² :

• Complete SN - Nipple and areola and glandular breast tissue
• SN - Nipple and glandular tissue (no areola)
• SN - Areola and glandular tissue (no nipple)
• Aberrant glandular tissue only
• SN - Nipple and areola and pseudomamma (fat tissue that replaces the glandular tissue)
• SN - Nipple only (the most common SN)
• SN - Areola only (polythelia areolaris)
• Patch of hair only (polythelia pilosa)

Although this classification is clear, encountering interchangeable terms and misnomers when dealing with the SN complex is not surprising because of the variability in morphologic patterns.

The paucity of descriptions of SNs in medical writings is probably due to its relatively minor clinical significance. However, the subject of SNs has been very popular in the last 2 decades because of the dilemma of possible associated malformations and diseases. The occurrence of SNs has been documented since Roman times and featured in legends and ethnic mythology prior to that time. SNs, and particularly polymastia, were attributed to increased femininity and fertility. Ancient artists depicted the goddess of Artemis of Ephesus and the Phoenician goddess of fertility, Astrate, like other ancient deities, as having row upon row of breasts on their chests.³ Anne Boleyn, the wife of King Henry VIII, was known to have a third breast. SNs in men were a sign of virility and endowed them with divine powers. Nowadays, film stars expose their SNs in the cinema with this same effect.³

The first medical report dates back to 1878 when Leichtenstern estimated the prevalence of SNs to be 1 in 500 (0.2%).⁴

Associations with other diseases

SN features are found in a number of syndromes, but, in most cases, it is probably a chance finding. These syndromes include Turner syndrome, Fanconi anemia, and other hematologic disorders⁵ ; ectodermal dysplasia; Kaufman-McKusick syndrome; and Char syndrome. Numerous sporadic publications linked SNs to an association with anomalies or diseases, but such an association is probably only a chance finding.

In 1979, Méhes drew attention to the association of SNs and other anomalies.⁶ The claim that 40% of SNs investigated also had renal involvement was striking. This figure was later corrected to 23-27%.^7,8 The renal involvement was infectious, a malformation, or neoplastic but mainly due to an obstructive disturbance. Other associations of SNs include the following:

• Central nervous system
  • Epilepsy
  • Migraine
  • Neurosis
  • Familial alcoholism
  • Fetal alcohol syndrome
  • Intracranial aneurism
  • Neural tube defect
  • Developmental delay
• Gastrointestinal
  • Peptic ulcer
  • Pyloric stenosis
• Ears, nose, throat and lung
  • Laryngeal web
  • Ear abnormalities
  • Accessory lung lobe
• Skeletal
  • Hand malformation
  • Vertebral anomaly
  • Absence of rib
  • Coronal suture synostosis
  • Hemihypertrophy
  • Arthrogryposis
  • Scalp defects and microcephaly
• Cardiac
  • Essential hypertension
  • Conduction defect
  • Bundle-branch block
  • Patent ductus arteriosus
  • Congenital heart disease, atrial septic defect, and ventricular septal defect

Publications concerning renal involvement in the presence of SN

In the following decade, numerous publications supported the claim for a close association of SNs and a renal anomaly, but many others could not find evidence to support such an association, which remains controversial.

• Claiming close association
  • Méhes, 1979⁶
  • Goedert et al, 1981⁹
  • Méhes, 1983⁷
  • Kahn and Wagner, 1982¹⁰
  • Varsano et al, 1984⁸
  • Meggyessy and Méhes, 1984¹¹
  • Hersch et al, 1987¹²
  • Méhes and Pinter, 1990¹³
  • Leung and Robson, 1990¹⁴
  • Urbini and Betti, 1996¹⁵
  • Brown and Schwartz, 2004¹⁶
• Denying support for association
  • Smith, 1981¹⁷
  • Rahbar, 1982¹⁸
  • Mimouni et al, 1983¹⁹
  • Robertson et al, 1986²⁰
  • Kenney et al, 1987²¹
  • Hoyme, 1987²²
  • Bortz et al, 1989²³
  • Armoni et al, 1992²⁴
  • Jójárt and Seres, 1994²⁵
  • Casey et al, 1996²⁶
  • Schmidt, 1998²⁷
  • Grotto et al, 2001²⁸

The eMedicine Pediatrics article Disorders of the Breast may be of interest.

Pathophysiology

Saint-Hilaire in 1836 and Darwin in 1871 advanced the concept of development of the human race from primitive animals; thus, they also considered the SN as an atavistic structure deriving from the milk line of mammals. Similarly, ectopic SN found on the vulva may express an atavistic structure because the breasts of dolphins and whales are in that location, or ectopic SN on the back, the scapula, and the shoulder^29,30,31 is reminiscent of the nutria and hutia (rodents) with a similar location of the breasts.

Between the fourth and fifth weeks of embryogenesis, an ectodermal thickening forms symmetrically along the ventral lateral sides of the embryo. This epidermal ridge extends from the axillary region to the inner side of the thigh to form the embryogenic milk (or mammary) line. During the second and third embryogenic months, the glandular elements of the breasts are formed near the fourth and fifth ribs, with regression of the rest of the thickened ectodermal streaks. In the case of failure of a complete regression, some foci may remain to result in a SN. This can develop into a supernumerary complete breast (polymastia) or into any other SN variant according to the Kajava classification.

Frequency

International

The prevalence of SNs varies with different reports. The prevalence is 0.22% in a Hungarian population,⁶ 1.63% in black American neonates,¹⁸ 2.5% in Israeli neonates,¹⁹ 4.7% in Israeli Arabic children,³² and 5.6% in German children.²⁷ These variabilities are attributed at least partially to differences in geographic regions, ethnic groups, and methodology, including methods of physical examination, as well as the age groups participating in the studies.

Sex

The male-to-female ratio differs in various studies, but, most often, the studies show a male predominance as high as 1.7:1.

Clinical

History

• Usually, the SN remains undetected or asymptomatic.
• Occasionally, the SN is noticed only when hormonal changes during adolescence, menstruation, or pregnancy cause increased pigmentation, fluctuating swelling, tenderness, or even lactation.

Physical

• The SN is often overlooked at the first examination of the neonate. It appears as a small pigmented or pearl-colored mark or as a concave or umbilicated spot. In 75% of patients, it measures no more than 30% of the diameter of the normal nipple (at times no more than 0.2-0.3 cm in diameter). In the other 25% of patients, it is of medium size, as large as 50% of the normal size of the nipple. Rarely, a SN is as large as a normal nipple.²⁷ It can be mistaken for many other small lesions, most of them hardly noticeable.
• Most SNs are single, and, when 2 or more (as many as 8) SNs are present, they are distributed bilaterally or unilaterally, symmetrically or not. Most SNs are located below the regular nipple, while approximately 13% appear above it along the milk line.¹⁹
• When examining adolescent girls, the normally developed breast may hide the SN. A number of studies have indicated a preponderance of SNs on the right side.²⁴
• For easier detection of the SN, a wet gauze pad is passed along the mammary line (milk line) from the axillary region to the upper part of the thigh on each side. This technique is particularly helpful in the dry and desquamating skin of full-term and postterm infants.¹⁹ When the suggested lesion is concave, folding it between fingers shows a typical wrinkling.
• A dermoscopic examination of SN shows a pattern similar to dermatofibroma, with both showing central, white, scarlike areas and a peripheral fine-pigment network. SN also has a cleftlike appearance in the central area, thus allowing differentiation from dermatofibroma.³³
• Approximately 5% of SNs are ectopic, located outside of the milk line, such as on the back (Hanson, 1978), the shoulder,³⁴ the limbs, the neck, the face, and the vulva and perineum.

Causes

Familial cases were recorded as parent-child transmission, including 1 report of a family who had SNs in 4 successive generations; therefore, autosomal dominant with incomplete expressivity is the accepted transmission of inheritance.³⁵

Differential Diagnoses

Workup

Histologic Findings

The histologic features of a SN are identical to that of the regular nipple, including hyperpigmentation, slight hyperkeratosis with epidermal thickening, pilosebaceous structure of Montgomery areolar tubercles, smooth muscle bundles typical of the areola, and possible mammary glands and intradermal straight ducts.³⁶ A significant increase in the number of clear cells of Toker has been found in SN tissue, indicating SN may be a precursor of extramammary Paget disease.³⁷

Treatment

Surgical Care

A protruding (or erectile) SN that causes the patient embarrassment can be easily removed surgically, if desired. Alternatively, a single report described removal using liquid nitrogen cryotherapy.³⁸ The removal of polymastia or a complete ectopic SN (with breast) is more involved.

The Medscape Dermatologic Surgery Resource Center may be of interest.

Consultations

Follow-up

Prognosis

Most SNs can be ignored; occasionally, a cosmetic blemish occurs. A sporadic SN typically does not present an indication for a thorough workup for other malformations (see Consultations).

Patient Education

Once a SN is diagnosed, inform the parents or the patient concerning its presence and reassure them that it is an insignificant minor anomaly. However, they ought to know that an SN can go through changes like any regular nipple or breast; these changes may be physiological during puberty or pathological, such as inflammation, mastitis, abscess formation, cysts, adenomata, fibroadenoma, carcinoma, melanoma, or Paget disease.

Miscellaneous

Medicolegal Pitfalls

Failure to diagnose an associated malformation of pathological change is a pitfall. Rarely, an SN may be associated with malformations. If an SN is accompanied by additional minor malformations, a prominent ectopic SN, or an established familial SN, then ultrasonography and nephrography investigation are indicated, bearing in mind that kidney and urinary tract pathologic findings can be present but silent.

Multimedia

Media file 1: Supernumerary nipple in a neonate. Courtesy of Dr P. Merlob.

Media file 2: Supernumerary nipple (bilateral) in an adolescent girl.

Media file 3: Supernumerary nipple in an adolescent boy. Courtesy of Dr B. Fisher.

Media file 4: Ectopic supernumerary nipple on the shoulder. Courtesy of Dr B. Fisher.

References

1. Conde DM, Kashimoto E, Torresan RZ, Alvarenga M. Pseudomamma on the foot: an unusual presentation of supernumerary breast tissue. Dermatol Online J. May 30 2006;12(4):7. [Medline].

2. De Cholnoky T. Supernumerary breast. Arch Surg. 1939;39:926-41.

3. Grossl NA. Supernumerary breast tissue: historical perspectives and clinical features. South Med J. Jan 2000;93(1):29-32. [Medline].

4. Leichtenstern D. Uber das Vorkommen und Bedeutung Supernumerarer (accessorischer ) Bruste und Brustwarzen. Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med. 1878;73:222.

5. Aslan D, Gürsel T, Kaya Z. Supernumerary nipples in children with hematologic disorders. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Jul-Aug 2004;21(5):461-3. [Medline].

6. Méhes K. Association of supernumerary nipples with other anomalies. J Pediatr. Aug 1979;95(2):274-5. [Medline].

7. Méhes K. Association of supernumerary nipples with other anomalies. J Pediatr. Jan 1983;102(1):161. [Medline].

8. Varsano IB, Jaber L, Garty BZ, Mukamel MM, Grünebaum M. Urinary tract abnormalities in children with supernumerary nipples. Pediatrics. Jan 1984;73(1):103-5. [Medline].

9. Goedert JJ, McKeen EA, Fraumeni JF Jr. Polymastia and renal adenocarcinoma. Ann Intern Med. Aug 1981;95(2):182-4. [Medline].

10. Kahn SA, Wagner RF Jr. Polythelia and unilateral renal agenesis. Cutis. Aug 1982;30(2):225-6. [Medline].

11. Meggyessy V, Méhes K. Association of supernumerary nipples with renal anomalies. J Pediatr. Sep 1987;111(3):412-3. [Medline].

12. Hersh JH, Bloom AS, Cromer AO, Harrison HL, Weisskopf B. Does a supernumerary nipple/renal field defect exist?. Am J Dis Child. Sep 1987;141(9):989-91. [Medline].

13. Méhes K, Pintér A. Minor morphological aberrations in children with isolated urinary tract malformations. Eur J Pediatr. Mar 1990;149(6):399-402. [Medline].

14. Leung AK, Robson WL. Renal anomalies in familial polythelia. Am J Dis Child. Jun 1990;144(6):619-20. [Medline].

15. Urbani CE, Betti R. Accessory mammary tissue associated with congenital and hereditary nephrourinary malformations. Int J Dermatol. May 1996;35(5):349-52. [Medline].

16. Brown J, Schwartz RA. Supernumerary nipples and renal malformations: a family study. J Cutan Med Surg. May-Jun 2004;8(3):170-2. [Medline].

17. Smith DW. Comment on association of supernumerary nipples with other anomalies. In: Oska FA, Stockman JA III, eds. Year Book of Pediatrics. Chicago, Ill: YB Medical Publishers; 1981:437.

18. Rahbar F. Clinical significance of supernumerary nipples in black neonates. Clin Pediatr (Phila). Jan 1982;21(1):46-7. [Medline].

19. Mimouni F, Merlob P, Reisner SH. Occurrence of supernumerary nipples in newborns. Am J Dis Child. Oct 1983;137(10):952-3. [Medline].

20. Robertson A, Sale P, Sathyanarayan. Lack of association of supernumerary nipples with renal anomalies in black infants. J Pediatr. Sep 1986;109(3):502-3. [Medline].

21. Kenney RD, Flippo JL, Black EB. Supernumerary nipples and renal anomalies in neonates. Am J Dis Child. Sep 1987;141(9):987-8. [Medline].

22. Hoyme HE. Minor malformations. Significant or insignificant?. Am J Dis Child. Sep 1987;141(9):947. [Medline].

23. Bortz J, Parker S, Ray TL. Lack of associated renal anomalies in familial polythelia. Am J Dis Child. Aug 1989;143(8):883. [Medline].

24. Armoni M, Filk D, Schlesinger M, Pollak S, Metzker A. Accessory nipples: any relationship to urinary tract malformation?. Pediatr Dermatol. Sep 1992;9(3):239-40. [Medline].

25. Jójárt G, Seres E. Supernumerary nipples and renal anomalies. Int Urol Nephrol. 1994;26(2):141-4. [Medline].

26. Casey HD, Chasan PE, Chick LR. Familial polythelia without associated anomalies. Ann Plast Surg. Jan 1996;36(1):101-4. [Medline].

27. Schmidt H. Supernumerary nipples: prevalence, size, sex and side predilection -- a prospective clinical study. Eur J Pediatr. Oct 1998;157(10):821-3. [Medline].

28. Grotto I, Browner-Elhanan K, Mimouni D, Varsano I, Cohen HA, Mimouni M. Occurrence of supernumerary nipples in children with kidney and urinary tract malformations. Pediatr Dermatol. Jul-Aug 2001;18(4):291-4. [Medline].

29. Newman M. Supernumerary nipples. Am Fam Physician. Aug 1988;38(2):183-8. [Medline].

30. Baruchin A, Rosenberg L. A supernumerary nipple in a rare site. Report of a case. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Nov 1981;7(11):918-9. [Medline].

31. Hanson E, Segóvia J. Dorsal supernumerary breast. Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1978;61(3):441-5. [Medline].

32. Jaber L, Merlob P. The prevalence of supernumerary nipples in Arab infants and children. Eur J Pediatr. May 1988;147(4):443. [Medline].

33. Oztas MO, Gurer MA. Dermoscopic features of accessory nipples. Int J Dermatol. Oct 2007;46(10):1067-8. [Medline].

34. Schewach-Millet M, Fisher BK. Supernumerary nipple on the shoulder. Cutis. Feb 1976;17(2):384-5. [Medline].

35. Toumbis-Ioannou E, Cohen PR. Familial polythelia. J Am Acad Dermatol. Apr 1994;30(4):667-8. [Medline].

36. Shewmake SW, Izuno GT. Supernumerary areolae. Arch Dermatol. Jun 1977;113(6):823-5. [Medline].

37. Willman JH, Golitz LE, Fitzpatrick JE. Clear cells of Toker in accessory nipples. J Cutan Pathol. Apr 2003;30(4):256-60. [Medline].

38. Sladden MJ, Sladden JA. A novel treatment for accessory nipples. Br J Dermatol. Feb 2008;158(2):405. [Medline].

Keywords

accessory nipples, polythelia, SN, polymastia, extra nipples

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Aryeh Metzker, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatric Dermatology, Senior Clinical Lecturer, Department of Dermatology, Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Mark A Crowe, MD, Assistant Clinical Instructor, Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine
Mark A Crowe, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and North American Clinical Dermatologic Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Michael J Wells, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Michael J Wells, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Robert A Schwartz, MD, MPH, Professor and Head of Dermatology, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Pediatrics, Professor of Pathology, Professor of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School
Robert A Schwartz, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Physicians, and Sigma Xi
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Glen H Crawford, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Chief, Division of Dermatology, The Pennsylvania Hospital
Glen H Crawford, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society of USAF Flight Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Dirk M Elston, MD, Director, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

© 1994- by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)