Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Preauricular Sinuses Treatment & Management

  • Author: Noah S Scheinfeld, JD, MD, FAAD; Chief Editor: William D James, MD  more...
 
Updated: Jan 25, 2016
 

Medical Care

In one large study, 52% of patients had inflammation of their sinuses, 34% had their sinus abscesses drained, and 18% of sinuses were infected. Infectious agents identified included Staphylococcus epidermidis (31%), Staphylococcus aureus (31%), Streptococcus viridans (15%), Peptococcus species (15%), and Proteus species (8%). Once a patient acquires infection of the sinus, he or she must receive systemic antibiotics. If an abscess is present, it must be incised and drained, and the exudate should be sent for Gram staining and culturing to ensure proper antibiotic coverage.

Next

Surgical Care

Once infection occurs, the likelihood of recurrent acute exacerbations is high, and the sinus tract should be surgically removed.[1] Surgery should take place once the infection has been treated with antibiotics and the inflammation has had time to subside. Controversy regarding indications for surgery exists. Some believe that the sinus tract should be surgically extirpated in patients who are asymptomatic because the onset of symptoms and subsequent infection cause scarring, which may lead to incomplete removal of the sinus tract and postoperative recurrences. The recurrence rate after surgery is 13-42% in smaller studies and 21% in one large study.

Most postoperative recurrences occur because of incomplete removal of the sinus tract. One way to prevent incomplete removal is to properly delineate the tract during surgery. Some surgeons cannulate the orifice and inject methylene blue dye into the tract 3 days prior to surgery under sterile conditions. The opening is then closed with a purse-string suture. This technique distends the tract and its extensions by its own secretion stained with methylene blue.

During surgery, some surgeons use either a probe or an injection of methylene blue dye for cannulation of the orifice. The most successful method is to use both modalities to delineate the entire tract. One report described 141 successful, infection-free results in which a gentian violet – soaked Cottonoid, which has antibacterial effects, was used instead of methylene blue dye.[15]

Other surgical techniques have been studied. The standard technique for extirpation of the sinus tract involves an incision around the sinus and subsequent dissection of the tract to the cyst near the helix. A supposedly more successful technique is the supra-auricular approach, which unlike the former technique, does not allow for difficulties in properly identifying the entire tract.[16] The supra-auricular approach extends the incision postauricularly. Once the temporalis fascia is identified, dissection of the tract begins. A portion of the auricular cartilage, which is attached to the tract, is also removed, decreasing the incidence of recurrence to 5%. Leopardi et al report that they prefer the supra-auricular approach for the surgical treatment of recurring preauricular sinus.[17]

Tan et al[18] reported the most current data in 2005, which suggested that the definitive surgical intervention that promises the best outcome is wide local excision of the sinus, not simple sinectomy. To minimize the risk of recurrence, Tan et al[18] suggest using magnification and intraoperatively opening the sinus and then following from the inside of the sinus to the outside branching tracts of the sinus.

Similarly, Chang and Wu[19] stated in 2005 that the use of an operating microscope can enhance the effectiveness of surgery to remove remnants and help prevent recurrence of a preauricular cyst.

Baatenburg de Jong reports on an "inside-out" technique, which was deemed superior to the classic repair technique, with fewer recurrences, in a small, single-institution study.[20]

Yeo et al[21] found that in a case series of 191 patients with preauricular sinuses (206 surgeries), the recurrence rate following surgery was 4.9%, with surgery under local anesthesia being a risk factor for recurrence (P = .009). Additionally, the cases that involved local infiltrative anesthesia had an increased rate of recurrence compared with surgery performed with the patient under general anesthesia (odds ratio, 6.875).

In a 2007 study from a referral center in Malaya, Tang et al[22] reviewed cases of 71 patients with 73 preauricular sinuses. They found an overall recurrence rate of 14.1% and that 16% of sinuses required drainage of an abscess prior to definitive surgery. Additionally, preauricular sinuses with a previous history of infection or those actively infected during the definitive surgery seemed to be associated with a higher tendency for recurrence. Surgical demonstration of the sinus tract by probing with lacrimal probes or sinus probes, followed by injection of methylene blue, reduces the recurrence rate. Some have advocated a minimal supra-auricular approach without a surgical drain for removal of preauricular sinuses.[23]

Dickson et al found that methylene blue was a safe and useful means of demarcation of preauricular sinuses and branchial sinuses and fistulae in a series of 20 children with preauricular sinuses and 11 with branchial sinuses and fistulae, allowing for smaller incisions and minimal dissections.[24]

In 2010, Bajwa and Kumar reported on radiofrequency thermal ablation versus cold steel” excision for supra-auricular excision of preauricular sinuses. They concluded that radiofrequency-assisted local wide excision appeared to be superior to cold steel excision because the former offered better perioperative visualization, with minimal bleeding and easier dissection. Additionally, they reported that radiofrequency thermal ablation was associated with a lower recurrence rate.[25]

In a 2009 study of the histologic relationship of preauricular sinuses to auricular cartilage, Dunham et al found that sinocartilaginous distances may suggest it can be challenging to dissect most sinus tracts from the cartilage. Thus, the routine removal of a minimal portion of auricular cartilage in combination with the sinus tract can provide a more thorough excision and may stop recurrence.[26]

A group in Singapore found that microscope guidance using probe guidance with methylene blue yields a lower recurrence rate than simply using methylene blue with probe guidance.[27]

A report form Chowdary et al advocates use of magnification during surgery. The surgery involves a wide surgical technique accompanied with a postextended auricular incision through a supra-auricular approach (successful at 8 y follow-up).[28]

The state-of-the-art of surgery on preauricular sinuses has not advanced in 2015, and surgical treatment options reported previously to 2015 continue to be used.[29]

Previous
Next

Consultations

Consult plastic surgeons or otolaryngologists for surgical treatment.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Noah S Scheinfeld, JD, MD, FAAD Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Weil Cornell Medical College; Consulting Staff, Department of Dermatology, St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary; Assistant Attending Dermatologist, New York Presbyterian Hospital; Assistant Attending Dermatologist, Lenox Hill Hospital, North Shore-LIJ Health System; Private Practice

Noah S Scheinfeld, JD, MD, FAAD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Abbvie<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Optigenex<br/>Received salary from Optigenex for employment.

Coauthor(s)

Valerie Nozad, DO Staff Physician, Beth Israel Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital for the Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jeffrey Weinberg, MD Director, Clinical Research Center, Department of Dermatology, St Luke's; Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons

Jeffrey Weinberg, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Michael J Wells, MD, FAAD Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine

Michael J Wells, MD, FAAD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Robert A Schwartz, MD, MPH Professor and Head of Dermatology, Professor of Pathology, Pediatrics, Medicine, and Preventive Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School; Visiting Professor, Rutgers University School of Public Affairs and Administration

Robert A Schwartz, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, New York Academy of Medicine, American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Physicians, Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

William D James, MD Paul R Gross Professor of Dermatology, Vice-Chairman, Residency Program Director, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

William D James, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, Society for Investigative Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Julie C Harper, MD Assistant Program Director, Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Julie C Harper, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology

Disclosure: Received honoraria from Stiefel for speaking and teaching; Received honoraria from Allergan for speaking and teaching; Received honoraria from Intendis for speaking and teaching; Received honoraria from Coria for speaking and teaching; Received honoraria from Sanofi-Aventis for speaking and teaching.

References
  1. Scheinfeld NS, Silverberg NB, Weinberg JM, Nozad V. The preauricular sinus: a review of its clinical presentation, treatment, and associations. Pediatr Dermatol. 2004 May-Jun. 21(3):191-6. [Medline].

  2. Kim JR, Kim do H, Kong SK, Gu PM, Hong TU, Kim BJ, et al. Congenital periauricular fistulas: possible variants of the preauricular sinus. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Nov. 78(11):1843-8. [Medline].

  3. Odhiambo A, Rotich EC, Chindia ML, Macigo FG, Ndavi M, Were F. Craniofacial anomalies amongst births at two hospitals in Nairobi, Kenya. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May. 41(5):596-603. [Medline].

  4. Wang R, Martinez-Frias ML, Graham JM Jr. Infants of diabetic mothers are at increased risk for the oculo-auriculo-vertebral sequence: A case-based and case-control approach. J Pediatr. 2002 Nov. 141(5):611-7. [Medline].

  5. Saltzmann RM, Lissner GS. Familial absence of lacrimal puncta associated with preauricular sinuses. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2006 Jul-Aug. 43(4):233-5. [Medline].

  6. Choi SJ, Choung YH, Park K, Bae J, Park HY. The variant type of preauricular sinus: postauricular sinus. Laryngoscope. 2007 Oct. 117(10):1798-802. [Medline].

  7. Leung AK, Robson WL. Association of preauricular sinuses and renal anomalies. Urology. 1992 Sep. 40(3):259-61. [Medline].

  8. Amer I, Falzon A, Choudhury N, Ghufoor K. Branchiootic syndrome--a clinical case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Aug. 47:1604-6. [Medline].

  9. Sampath S, Keats BJ, Lacassie Y. HPPD: A newly recognized autosomal dominant disorder involving hypertelorism,preauricular sinus, punctal pits, and deafness mapping to chromosome 14q31. Am J Med Genet A. 2011 May. 5:976-85. [Medline].

  10. Yilmaz AE, Sarifakioglu E, Aydemir S, Tas T, Orün E, Aydemir H. Preauricular sinus, nephrolithiasis, infantine eczema and natal tooth:a new association. Eur J Dermatol. 2011 Mar-Apr. 2:234-7. [Medline].

  11. Lapeña JF Jr, Jimena GL. Coexisting first and bilateral second branchial fistulas in a child with nonfamilial branchio-otic syndrome. Ear Nose Throat J. 2013 Jul. 92(7):304, 306-9. [Medline].

  12. Jalil J, Basheer F, Shafique M. Branchio-oto-renal syndrome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 May. 24(5):367-8. [Medline].

  13. Martin-Granizo R, Perez-Herrero MC, Sanchez-Cuellar A. Methylene blue staining and probing for fistula resection: application in a case of bilateral congenital preauricular fistulas. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Aug. 31(4):439-41. [Medline].

  14. McArdle AJ, Shroff R. Question 3 * Is ultrasonography required to rule out congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract in babies with isolated preauricular tags or sinuses?. Arch Dis Child. 2013 Jan. 98:84-7. [Medline].

  15. Shim HS, Ko YI, Kim MC, Han KT, Lim JS. A simple and reproducible surgical technique for the management of preauricular sinuses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Sep. 149(3):399-401. [Medline].

  16. Lam HC, Soo G, Wormald PJ, Van Hasselt CA. Excision of the preauricular sinus: a comparison of two surgical techniques. Laryngoscope. 2001 Feb. 111(2):317-9. [Medline].

  17. Leopardi G, Chiarella G, Conti S, Cassandro E. Surgical treatment of recurring preauricular sinus: supra-auricular approach. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008 Dec. 28(6):302-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  18. Tan T, Constantinides H, Mitchell TE. The preauricular sinus: A review of its aetiology, clinical presentation and management. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Nov. 69(11):1469-74. [Medline].

  19. Chang PH, Wu CM. An insidious preauricular sinus presenting as an infected postauricular cyst. Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Mar. 59(3):370-2. [Medline].

  20. Baatenburg de Jong RJ. A new surgical technique for treatment of preauricular sinus. Surgery. 2005 May. 137(5):567-70. [Medline].

  21. Yeo SW, Jun BC, Park SN, et al. The preauricular sinus: factors contributing to recurrence after surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 2006 Nov-Dec. 27(6):396-400. [Medline].

  22. Tang IP, Shashinder S, Kuljit S, Gopala KG. Outcome of patients presenting with preauricular sinus in a tertiary centre--a five year experience. Med J Malaysia. 2007 Mar. 62(1):53-5. [Medline].

  23. Bae SC, Yun SH, Park KH, et al. Preauricular sinus: advantage of the drainless minimal supra-auricular approach. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011 Nov 29. [Medline].

  24. Dickson JM, Riding KH, Ludemann JP. Utility and safety of methylene blue demarcation of preauricular sinuses and branchial sinuses and fistulae in children. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Apr. 38(2):302-10. [Medline].

  25. Bajwa H, Kumar S. Radiofrequency thermal ablation versus 'cold steel' for supra-auricular excision of preauricular sinus: comparative study. J Laryngol Otol. 2010 Jun 11. 1-4. [Medline].

  26. Dunham B, Guttenberg M, Morrison W, Tom L. The histologic relationship of preauricular sinuses to auricular cartilage. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Dec. 135(12):1262-5. [Medline].

  27. Gan EC, Anicete R, Tan HK, Balakrishnan A. Preauricular sinuses in the pediatric population: Techniques and recurrence rates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Dec 21. [Medline].

  28. Kumar Chowdary KV, Sateesh Chandra N, Karthik Madesh R. Preauricular sinus: a novel approach. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jul. 65(3):234-6. [Medline].

  29. Hills SE, Maddalozzo J. Congenital lesions of epithelial origin. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015 Feb. 48 (1):209-23. [Medline].

  30. Coatesworth AP, Patmore H, Jose J. Management of an infected preauricular sinus, using a lacrimal probe. J Laryngol Otol. 2003 Dec. 117(12):983-4. [Medline].

  31. Winkler AA, Stallmeyer MJ, Le TT. Report of a scalp arteriovenous malformation spontaneously hemorrhaging into a preauricular sinus. Ear Nose Throat J. 2009 Feb. 88(2):E17-20. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Small dell adjacent to the ear demonstrates the preauricular sinus.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.