- Author: William P Baugh, MD; Chief Editor: William D James, MD more...
Phytophotodermatitis (PPD) is a cutaneous phototoxic inflammatory eruption resulting from contact with light-sensitizing botanical substances and long-wave ultraviolet (UV-A 320-380 nm) radiation. The eruption usually begins approximately 24 hours after exposure and peaks at 48-72 hours. The phototoxic result may be intensified by wet skin, sweating, and heat.
Phytophotodermatitis typically manifests as a burning erythema that may subsequently blister. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation lasting weeks to months may ensue (see the images below). In some patients, the preceding inflammatory reaction may be mild and go unrecognized by the patient. In this case, the patient presents with only pigmentary changes.
See 11 Common Plants That Can Cause Dangerous Poisonings, a Critical Images slideshow, to help identify plant reactions and poisonings.
Cutaneous inflammation produced by plants can be separated into 4 groups based on their specific mechanism of action: urticarial dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, and phototoxic dermatitis.
Phytophotodermatitis is a phototoxic reaction entirely independent of the immune system; that is, phytophotodermatitis can occur in any individual, and prior sensitization or an intact immune system is not required. The ingredients needed to produce phytophotodermatitis include temporal exposure to both a photosensitizing substance, such as psoralens, and ultraviolet radiation. Furocoumarins are photosensitizing chemical components produced by certain plants and consist of psoralens, 5-methoxypsoralens, 8-methoxypsoralens, angelicin, bergaptol, and xanthotal.
The natural sunlight emission spectrum reaching the earth ranges from approximately 270-5000 nm. This electromagnetic radiation consists of photons with a reciprocal relationship between the wavelength and the energy of the photons. Only light that is absorbed into the skin can cause a photochemical reaction. Within the light spectra, UV-A (320-400 nm) is responsible for the vast majority of photoreactions resulting in phytophotodermatitis.
The wavelengths of ultraviolet light that most efficiently produce phytophotodermatitis lie within the UV-A range and have peak activity at 335 nm. When a photon with the appropriate wavelength strikes a furocoumarin, the energy is absorbed, raising this chemical to a triple excited state from the ground state. Upon return to the ground state, energy is released in the form of heat, fluorescence, and/or phosphorescence, and a photoproduct may form.
Two distinct photochemical reactions have been described in phytophotodermatitis, which occur independently from each other. A type I reaction occurs in the absence of oxygen, whereas a type II reaction occurs in the presence of oxygen. These photochemical reactions damage cell membranes and DNA and result in DNA interstrand cross-linking between the psoralen furan ring and the thymines or the cytosines of DNA. During the type I oxygen-independent reaction, the RNA and nuclear DNA become fastened to the exposed ultraviolet-activated furocoumarins. Likewise, the oxygen-dependent reactions result in cell membrane damage and edema from activated furocoumarins. This results in activation of arachidonic acid metabolic pathways and in cell death (sunburn cells and apoptotic keratinocytes). Clinically, erythema, blistering, epidermal necrosis, and eventual epidermal desquamation occur. See the image below.
A postinflammatory pigment alteration may follow the acute phase of this phototoxic reaction. This alteration occurs primarily by 2 mechanisms. First, melanin, which is normally found in the epidermis, "falls" into the dermis and is ingested by melanophages. Secondly, an increased number of functional melanocytes and melanosomes are distributed in the epidermis following phytophotodermatitis and also account for the hyperpigmentation. This hyperpigmentation may serve as a protective mechanism against further UV injury. Clinically, this corresponds with irregular hyperpigmentation (or occasionally hypopigmentation resulting in dyschromia) seen as the end stage of the phototoxic reaction.
The frequency of phytophotodermatitis in the general population has not been well established.
The overall incidence of phytophotodermatitis is unknown, but it undoubtedly varies according to the population studied and is based on the risk of exposure to psoralen compounds. Because furocoumarins are found in a wide range of wild and domestic plants, a variety of patient groups may become exposed. An example of an international greenery known to produce phytophotodermatitis is Ficus carica, also known as a fig tree. This plant is often sought for the fruit it produces, as well as for analgesic folk medicine applications. Ficus pumila can be found worldwide, yet is native to China, Japan, and Taiwan.
Most commonly, phytophotodermatitis is a localized cutaneous phenomenon resulting initially in a burning sensation, which may be followed acutely by erythema and blistering. Eventually, the affected sites may desquamate and develop permanent hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation. However, scarring is rare.
Any race may be affected, but phytophotodermatitis is most easily recognized in fair-skinned patients.
Both sexes may be affected.
Any age may be affected, but note that phytophotodermatitis occurring on a child may be mistaken for child abuse. Classic examples include a handprint pattern on a child after exposure to a parent cooking with lime juice or a linear drip pattern on a child's hands and arms after eating real juice ice pops.
Smith E, Kiss F, Porter RM, Anstey AV. A review of UVA-mediated photosensitivity disorders. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2011 Dec 16. 11(1):199-206. [Medline].
Berkley SF, Hightower AW, Beier RC, et al. Dermatitis in grocery workers associated with high natural concentrations of furanocoumarins in celery. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Sep. 105(3):351-5. [Medline].
Maso MJ, Ruszkowski AM, Bauerle J, DeLeo VA, Gasparro FP. Celery phytophotodermatitis in a chef. Arch Dermatol. 1991 Jun. 127(6):912-3. [Medline].
Bassioukas K, Stergiopoulou C, Hatzis J. Erythrodermic phytophotodermatitis after application of aqueous fig-leaf extract as an artificial suntan promoter and sunbathing. Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Aug. 51(2):94-5. [Medline].
Bollero D, Stella M, Rivolin A, Cassano P, Risso D, Vanzetti M. Fig leaf tanning lotion and sun-related burns: case reports. Burns. 2001 Nov. 27(7):777-9. [Medline].
Moloney FJ, Parnell J, Buckley CC. Iatrogenic phytophotodermatitis resulting from herbal treatment of an allergic contact dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2006 Jan. 31(1):39-41. [Medline].
Beattie PE, Wilkie MJ, Smith G, Ferguson J, Ibbotson SH. Can dietary furanocoumarin ingestion enhance the erythemal response during high-dose UVA1 therapy?. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Jan. 56(1):84-7. [Medline].
Kavli G, Volden G, Raa J. Accidental induction of photocontact allergy to Heracleum laciniatum. Acta Derm Venereol. 1982. 62(5):435-8. [Medline].
Morlière P, Hüppe G, Averbeck D, Young AR, Santus R, Dubertret L. In vitro photostability and photosensitizing properties of bergamot oil. Effects of a cinnamate sunscreen. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1990 Nov. 7(2-4):199-208. [Medline].
Izumi AK, Dawson KL. Zabon phytophotodermatitis: first case reports due to Citrus maxima. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 May. 46(5 Suppl):S146-7. [Medline].
Lovell CR. Plants and the Skin. London, England: Blackwell Science; 1993. 64-95.
Coffman K, Boyce WT, Hansen RC. Phytophotodermatitis simulating child abuse. Am J Dis Child. 1985 Mar. 139(3):239-40. [Medline].
Kos L, Shwayder T. Cutaneous manifestations of child abuse. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006 Jul-Aug. 23(4):311-20. [Medline].
Carlsen K, Weismann K. Phytophotodermatitis in 19 children admitted to hospital and their differential diagnoses: Child abuse and herpes simplex virus infection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Nov. 57(5 Suppl):S88-91. [Medline].
Koh D, Ong CN. Phytophotodermatitis due to the application of citrus hystrix as a folk remedy. Br J Dermatol. 1999 Apr. 140(4):737-8. [Medline].
Burnett JW, Nguyen TV. Phytophotodermatitis: differentiation from jellyfish stings. Australas J Dermatol. 1989. 30(2):101-2. [Medline].
Ahmed I, Charles-Holmes R. Phytophotodermatitis mimicking superficial lymphangitis. Br J Dermatol. 2000 May. 142(5):1069. [Medline].
Tunget CL, Turchen SG, Manoguerra AS, Clark RF, Pudoff DE. Sunlight and the plant: a toxic combination: severe phytophotodermatitis from Cneoridium dumosum. Cutis. 1994 Dec. 54(6):400-2. [Medline].
Almeida HL Jr, Sotto MN, Castro LA, Rocha NM. Transmission electron microscopy of the preclinical phase of experimental phytophotodermatitis. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Jun. 63(3):371-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Jorge VM, de Almeida HL Jr, Amado M. Serial light microscopy of experimental phytophotodermatitis in animal model. J Cutan Pathol. 2009 Mar. 36(3):338-41. [Medline].
Bensasson RV, Land EJ, Salet C. Triplet excited state of furocoumarins: reaction with nucleic acid bases and amino acids. Photochem Photobiol. 1978 Mar. 27(3):273-80. [Medline].
Furniss D, Adams T. Herb of grace: an unusual cause of phytophotodermatitis mimicking burn injury. J Burn Care Res. 2007 Sep-Oct. 28(5):767-9. [Medline].
Hipkin CR. Phytophotodermatitis, a botanical view. Lancet. 1991 Oct 5. 338(8771):892-3. [Medline].
Klaber RE. Phytophotodermatitis. Arch Dis Child. 2006 May. 91(5):385. [Medline].
Musajo L, Rodighiero G. Studies on the photo-C4-cyclo-addition reactions between skin-photosensitizing furocoumarins and nucleic acids. Photochem Photobiol. 1970 Jan. 11(1):27-35. [Medline].
Oakley AM, Ive FA, Harrison MA. String trimmer's dermatitis. J Soc Occup Med. 1986 Winter. 36(4):143-4. [Medline].
Ozdamar E, Ozbek S, Akin S. An unusual cause of burn injury: fig leaf decoction used as a remedy for a dermatitis of unknown etiology. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003 Jul-Aug. 24(4):229-33; discussion 228. [Medline].
Pathak MA. Phytophotodermatitis. Clin Dermatol. 1986 Apr-Jun. 4(2):102-21. [Medline].
Santucci B, Picardo M. Occupational contact dermatitis to plants. Clin Dermatol. 1992 Apr-Jun. 10(2):157-65. [Medline].
Stoner JG, Rasmussen JE. Plant dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983 Jul. 9(1):1-15. [Medline].
Wagner AM, Wu JJ, Hansen RC, Nigg HN, Beiere RC. Bullous phytophotodermatitis associated with high natural concentrations of furanocoumarins in limes. Am J Contact Dermat. 2002 Mar. 13(1):10-4. [Medline].
Wang L, Sterling B, Don P. Berloque dermatitis induced by "Florida water". Cutis. 2002 Jul. 70(1):29-30. [Medline].
Wynn P, Bell S. Phytophotodermatitis in grounds operatives. Occup Med (Lond). 2005 Aug. 55(5):393-5. [Medline].
Young AR, Magnus IA. An action spectrum for 8-MOP induced sunburn cells in mammalian epidermis. Br J Dermatol. 1981 May. 104(5):541-8. [Medline].
Zaynoun ST, Aftimos BG, Abi Ali L, Tenekjian KK, Khalidi U, Kurban AK. Ficus carica; isolation and quantification of the photoactive components. Contact Dermatitis. 1984 Jul. 11(1):21-5. [Medline].
|Family||Genus||Species||Common Names||Main Compounds|
|Umbelliferae||Amni||majus||Queen Anne's lace, Bishop's weed||8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP), 5-methoxypsoralen (5-MOP), imperatorin|
|Heracleum||sphondylium||Cow parsnip||8-MOP, 5-MOP, imperatorin, phellopterin|
|Heracleum||mantegazzianum||Giant hogweed, Cartwheel flower||8-MOP, 5-MOP, imperatorin, phellopterin|
|Pastinaca||sativa||Parsnip||8-MOP, 5-MOP, imperatorin, isopimpinellin|
|Apium||graveolens||Celery||Psoralens, 8-MOP, 5-MOP|
|Dictamnus||albus||Gas plant, “Burning bush of Moses”||8-MOP, 5-MOP|
|Leguminosae||Psoralea||corylifolia||Bavchi, Scurf pea||Psoralens|