Follicular Unit Hair Transplant Method 

  • Author: Marc R Avram, MD; Chief Editor: Dirk M Elston, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jan 25, 2012
 

Background

From the 1960s into the mid 1990s, transplanted hair appeared unnatural because surgeons used unnaturally large-appearing hair grafts consisting of 10-25 hairs each. That era is over. Hair naturally grows in 1-4 hair follicular groupings. In the early 1990s, surgeons began switching from using unnatural-appearing hair "plugs" (10-25 hairs) to using consistently natural-appearing hair follicular groupings (1-4 hairs). In current practice, all women and men should expect consistently natural-appearing transplanted hair.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Follicular unit transplantation is the redistribution of naturally occurring follicular groupings from the posterior scalp (donor region) into the region of thinning hair in the midfontal scalp (recipient sites).[7] The groupings are removed from the donor area by an elliptical excision and are carefully dissected using appropriate lighting and magnification.[8] The donor tissue is separated into follicular units, which are then reimplanted into recipient sites created by 19- and 20-gauge needles. The sites are carefully created between thinning existing hair and in a distribution that will look natural 1-20 years after surgery.

Follicular unit transplantation is the standard surgical technique to treat male- and female-pattern hair loss. Follicular unit transplantation is also used to correct unnatural-appearing pluglike transplants, repair eyebrows, and redistribute hair in persons with inactive scarring alopecias.

Next

Problem

Hair frames the face. The length, style, and color of hair often reflect how people see themselves. The slow involuntary loss of hair over the years impacts how the world perceives an individual and, more importantly, how individuals see themselves. Involuntary hair loss can have an emotional impact on an individual that ranges from minimal to profound. With medication, hair transplantation, or both, a natural frame of hair can be maintained or restored in patients with male- and female-pattern hair loss.

Male- and female-pattern hair loss are polygenetic disorders of unknown etiology. The precise genes involved remain unknown. The age of onset and the rate of hair loss vary from patient to patient. Some patients lose all their hair in their early 20s, while others’ hair gradual thins over decades. Family history of hair loss does not necessary determine the pattern of hair loss in each individual.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

Male-pattern hair loss affects approximately 50% of all men, and female-pattern hair loss affects approximately 30-40% of all women. The rate of loss and extent of loss vary from patient to patient.[9]

Previous
Next

Etiology

The etiology of male -and female-pattern hair loss remains unknown. Some consider it to be a polygenetic disorder from both parents. It has not been associated with any particular diet, hair style, or infection.

Previous
Next

Indications

As with all surgical procedures, appropriate candidate selection is vital to the success of the procedure. Persons with any hair color type or skin type are candidates. Key factors to consider in candidate selection include donor density in the posterior scalp, caliber of hair, extent and rate of hair loss, and realistic expectations.

Donor density

Most patients have 60-85 follicular groupings per cm2. Patients with a higher density are able to receive more grafts than those with below-average density with an equal-size donor ellipse. The number of grafts needed during a surgery is a reflection of the size of the recipient zone.

The scalps of white persons have approximately 100 units per cm2. The units average approximately 2.3 hairs each; therefore, in white persons, the average scalp has approximately 230 terminal hairs per cm2. Blacks and Asians have significantly lower densities of both units and hair compared with white persons. See the image below.

Comparison of donor densities. Left donor has 72 fComparison of donor densities. Left donor has 72 follicular units per cm2; right donor has 134 units per cm2.

Caliber of hair follicles

The caliber of a patient’s hair follicles plays a vital role in the perceived density a transplant can create. A man or women with fine, thin hair will produce fine and thin transplanted hair, while a man or woman with coarse, wavy hair will create thick-appearing transplanted hair.

Extent and rate of hair loss

In an era in which male- and female-pattern hair loss can be halted with minoxidil and/or finasteride (for men), transplantation should only be performed in patients who have enough space between thinning existing hair follicles to create a recipient site and place a graft.

The net perceived density of a hair transplant is equal to the number of hair follicles transplanted minus ongoing hair loss. All patients must understand that ongoing hair loss will affect the perceived density of the transplant. While often successful, medications for hair loss are elective. The design and distribution of a hair transplant must assume ongoing hair loss and how it will impact the density and cosmetic appearance of the transplant. An estimation of how many procedures will be needed to achieve a short- and long-term natural-appearing transplant should be discussed during the initial consultation with the patient.

Realistic expectations

The most common complication from a transplantation is failed expectations. The physician must create realistic expectations during the consultation. Factors such as donor density, caliber of hair follicles, and rate of hair loss will help determine realistic expectations.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

Hair transplantation should not be performed on a patient with unrealistic expectations. In addition, patients taking blood thinners should not undergo hair transplantation. Finally, any patient with an active medical condition that may interfere with the procedure should obtain medical clearance.

Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Marc R Avram, MD  Dermatologist, Private Practice; Clinical Associate Professor of Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Chief, Department of Dermatology, Long Island College Hospital

Marc R Avram, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, and International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

R Stan Taylor, MD  The JB Howell Professor in Melanoma Education and Detection, Departments of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Director, Skin Surgery and Oncology Clinic, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

R Stan Taylor, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Surgery, American Dermatological Association, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Christian Medical & Dental Society, and Society for Investigative Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Richard P Vinson, MD  Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Mountain View Dermatology, PA

Richard P Vinson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, Association of Military Dermatologists, Texas Dermatological Society, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John G Albertini, MD  Consulting Staff, Dermatologic Surgery, The Skin Surgery Center; Program Director, ACGME Accredited Fellowship in Procedural Dermatology

John G Albertini, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Joel M Gelfand, MD, MSCE  Medical Director, Clinical Studies Unit, Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Associate Scholar, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania

Joel M Gelfand, MD, MSCE is a member of the following medical societies: Society for Investigative Dermatology

Disclosure: AMGEN Consulting fee Consulting; AMGEN Grant/research funds Investigator; Genentech Grant/research funds investigator; Centocor Consulting fee Consulting; Abbott Grant/research funds investigator; Abbott Consulting fee Consulting; Novartis investigator; Pfizer Grant/research funds investigator; Celgene Consulting fee DMC Chair; NIAMS and NHLBI Grant/research funds investigator

Chief Editor

Dirk M Elston, MD  Director, Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology, New York

Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author, Bobby Limmer, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Headington JT. Transverse microscopic anatomy of the human scalp. A basis for a morphometric approach to disorders of the hair follicle. Arch Dermatol. Apr 1984;120(4):449-56. [Medline].

  2. Orentreich N. Autografts in alopecias and other selected dermatological conditions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Nov 20 1959;83:463-79. [Medline].

  3. Vogel JE. Hair restoration complications: an approach to the unnatural-appearing hair transplant. Facial Plast Surg. Nov 2008;24(4):453-61. [Medline].

  4. Beehner M. Hairline design in hair replacement surgery. Facial Plast Surg. Nov 2008;24(4):389-403. [Medline].

  5. Rousso DE, Presti PM. Follicular unit transplantation. Facial Plast Surg. Nov 2008;24(4):381-8. [Medline].

  6. Sinclair R, Patel M, Dawson TL Jr, Yazdabadi A, Yip L, Perez A, et al. Hair loss in women: medical and cosmetic approaches to increase scalp hair fullness. Br J Dermatol. Dec 2011;165 Suppl 3:12-8. [Medline].

  7. Dua A, Dua K. Follicular unit extraction hair transplant. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. May 2010;3(2):76-81. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Limmer BL. Elliptical donor stereoscopically assisted micrografting as an approach to further refinement in hair transplantation. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Dec 1994;20(12):789-93. [Medline].

  9. Hamilton JB. Patterned loss of hair in man; types and incidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Mar 1951;53(3):708-28. [Medline].

  10. Seager D. Binocular stereoscopic dissecting microscoping-should we use them?. Hair Transplant Forum Int. 1996;6:2-5.

  11. Bunagan MJ, Pathomvanich D, Laorwong K. Recipient area folliculitis after follicular-unit transplantation: characterization of clinical features and analysis of associated factors. Dermatol Surg. Jul 2010;36(7):1161-5. [Medline].

  12. Bernstein RM, Rassman WR, Szaniawski W. Follicular transplantation. Int J Aesthetic Restor Surg. 1995;3:119-32.

  13. Bradshaw W, Unger WP, Nordstrom REA, eds. Quarter-grafts: a technique for minigrafts. In: Hair Transplantation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1988:333-51.

  14. Fujita K. Reconstruction of eyebrow. La Lepro. 1943;22:364.

  15. Limmer BL, Buchwach KA. Hair transplantation using follicular unit micrografting. Facial Plast Surg. 1999;7(4):523-35, viii.

  16. Marritt E. Single-hair transplantation for hairline refinement: a practical solution. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Dec 1984;10(12):962-6. [Medline].

  17. Nordstrom REA. "Micrografts" for improvement of the frontal hairline after transplantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1981;5:97-101.

  18. Norwood O. Follicular unit transplant. Hair Transplant Forum Int. 1998;8(2):10-11.

  19. Norwood O, Limmer BL. Advances in hair transplantation. Adv Dermatol. 1999;14:89-113; discussion 114. [Medline].

  20. Okuda S. [Clinical and experimental studies of transplantation of living hairs]. Jpn J Dermatol Urol. 1939;46:135-8.

  21. Stough DB 4th, Nelson BR, Stough DB 3rd. Incisional slit grafting. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Jan 1991;17(1):53-60. [Medline].

  22. Tamura H. Pubic hair transplantation. Jpn J Dermatol. 1943;53:76.

  23. Uebel CO. Micrografts and minigrafts: a new approach for baldness surgery. Ann Plast Surg. Nov 1991;27(5):476-87. [Medline].

  24. Vallis CP. Surgical treatment of the receding hairline. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1967;40(2):138-46. [Medline].

  25. Vallis CP. Surgical treatment of the receding hairline. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1969;44(3):271-8. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Pattern VI alopecia before and after follicular unit micrografting.
Dorsal view of pattern V alopecia before and after approximately 2000 follicular unit micrografts.
Comparison of donor densities. Left donor has 72 follicular units per cm2; right donor has 134 units per cm2.
Donor ellipse and sutured donor site.
Margin of donor ellipse and follicular unit micrografts of 1, 2, and 3 hairs.
Eyebrow transplantation. Left is preoperative. Right is after 400 follicular unit micrografts.
Close-up view of frontal hairline before and after micrografts.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.