Follicular Unit Hair Transplant Method Treatment & Management

  • Author: Marc R Avram, MD; Chief Editor: Dirk M Elston, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jan 25, 2012
 

Medical Therapy

Minoxidil and finasteride are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat male-pattern hair loss. Minoxidil is the only medication approved for the treatment of female-pattern hair loss. Both medications are more effective for patients with earlier stages of hair loss and are excellent treatment options for patients who are losing hair but who are not candidates for surgery. The key to success with each medication is compliance. Six to 12 months can elapse before medications begin to work.

For patients who are candidates for surgery, continuing medical treatment often helps increase the density of transplanted hair by slowing down the rate of loss of existing hair and increasing the caliber of existing and transplanted hair. Medication usage should not alter candidate selection, the hairline design, or the distribution of transplanted hair. In all patients, the physician must assume the patient may stop taking the medications sometime in the future and must determine the cosmetic impact this would have on the transplanted hair.

Finally, a variety of over-the-counter products purport to treat male- and female-pattern hair loss. Few to no independent, peer-reviewed studies support their safety or efficacy.

Next

Preoperative Details

Planning and design

The midpoint of the frontal hairline is designed to fall approximately 8-9 cm above a horizontal line drawn through the center of the patient's eyebrows. Then, the hairline is gently curved laterally and superiorly toward the temporal lateral fringe. This curvilinear portion of the hairline may rise gently above, but should not be designed below, the horizontal plane. Depending on the existent lateral fringe, the hairline may be connected to this temporal fringe.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Donor area

All patients should be aware before surgery that a permanent scar will result from removing the donor ellipse. For the vast majority of patients, the scar is of no practical concern. If a patient wears his or her hair at least 2 cm in length, the existing hair will camouflage the scar.

The donor region is the only limiting factor in hair transplantation. For the majority of transplants, the donor hair is harvested via a surgical ellipse. The length and width of the ellipse is a reflection of the number of grafts needed for the surgery and the patient’s donor density. The average donor density is 80-90 follicular groupings per cm2. To increase the number of grafts, make the ellipse longer rather than wider. Ellipses wider than 1 cm have an increased risk of creating a wider or even hypertrophic scar. As an example, if 1000 grafts are needed and a patient has average donor density, an ellipse of 14 X 0.8 cm will provide approximately 1000 grafts.

The donor ellipse is removed with the patient under local anesthesia and in the prone position. Staples or sutures are left in place for 7-10 days.

Graft dissection

Once the donor tissue has been removed, it is kept in chilled saline over frozen packs to maintain a cool temperature while the tissue is dissected. To maintain graft viability, the grafts must not become dehydrated or heated. The grafts are dissected using a binocular microscope at a minimum magnification of 10X.[10] Sterilized tongue blades placed over an autoclavable glass cutting plate create a cutting surface for the tissue. Assistants use jeweler's forceps to apply traction while cutting with a standard double-edged razor blade or knife. Donor tissue first is reduced to thin wafers or slivers containing only a few follicular units. Then, these slivers are cut into follicular units and trimmed of excess bald tissue.

See the image below.

Donor ellipse and sutured donor site. Donor ellipse and sutured donor site.

The use of magnification and a polarized light allows minimal transection of follicles during the dissection process and dense packing in the recipient area. The ability to create greater density within the recipient zone as a result of the small size of the grafts is the key to follicular unit hair transplantation. The dissection process is undeniably the most labor-intensive portion of the process and requires 2-3 graft-dissection assistants for every one implanting assistant.

Graft implantation

During the implantation stage, the follicular unit grafts are placed into the anesthetized recipient sites created by 19- to 22-gauge needles by using microvascular forceps. A goal of 20-30 follicular unit grafts per cm2 is reasonable and readily achieved by skilled assistants.

See the image below.

Margin of donor ellipse and follicular unit microgMargin of donor ellipse and follicular unit micrografts of 1, 2, and 3 hairs.
Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Once the implantation process has been completed, the recipient surface is cleaned using chilled saline spray. The use of a postoperative dressing helps protect the grafts as they heal overnight.

Patients are able to resume regular activities immediately but should avoid heavy exercise for at least 3-4 days after surgery. Patients can remove the dressing at home the morning after the procedure. Some perifollicular hemorrhagic crusting can be seen at this point, and it remains for 5-8 days. Patients are instructed to shower but should not try to pick off their scabs. The majority of patients with existing hair return to work after 2-3 days without any cosmetic problems. The staples or sutures are removed in 7-10 days. The transplanted hair should begin to grow 3-6 months after surgery and should be fully grown in 12 months.

See the images below.

Pattern VI alopecia before and after follicular unPattern VI alopecia before and after follicular unit micrografting. Dorsal view of pattern V alopecia before and afterDorsal view of pattern V alopecia before and after approximately 2000 follicular unit micrografts. Eyebrow transplantation. Left is preoperative. RigEyebrow transplantation. Left is preoperative. Right is after 400 follicular unit micrografts. Close-up view of frontal hairline before and afterClose-up view of frontal hairline before and after micrografts.
Previous
Next

Complications

Medical and surgical complications are rare and, if they occur, are seldom threatening. Postoperative bleeding and infections are unusually rare. Donor suture lines occasionally may spread and are more prone to do so if closure is performed under tension. Transient folliculitis or pruritus may occur.[11]

The majority of complications arise from poor hairline design, poor technique, and, most commonly, unrealistic patient expectations.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

The goal is to make the final product look so natural that it cannot be distinguished as a transplant. The tight packing of grafts provided by microscopic dissection generates a natural appearance acceptable to most patients. Although this method is time and labor intensive, the results justify the meticulous attention to detail.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Low-level light therapy has been advocated as a possible new therapy for male-pattern hair loss. In 2007, a device received 510k approval from the FDA to treat male-pattern hair loss. As of early 2009, the existence of large independent peer-reviewed studies has not yet been made public.

Cloning hair follicles has been a topic of intense interest among physicians and patients for many years. Several privately funded laboratories are working on cloning hair follicles. Early studies are promising, but the reality of having unlimited hair follicles to transplant remains years away.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Marc R Avram, MD  Dermatologist, Private Practice; Clinical Associate Professor of Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Chief, Department of Dermatology, Long Island College Hospital

Marc R Avram, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, and International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

R Stan Taylor, MD  The JB Howell Professor in Melanoma Education and Detection, Departments of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Director, Skin Surgery and Oncology Clinic, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

R Stan Taylor, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Surgery, American Dermatological Association, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Christian Medical & Dental Society, and Society for Investigative Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Richard P Vinson, MD  Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Mountain View Dermatology, PA

Richard P Vinson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, Association of Military Dermatologists, Texas Dermatological Society, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John G Albertini, MD  Consulting Staff, Dermatologic Surgery, The Skin Surgery Center; Program Director, ACGME Accredited Fellowship in Procedural Dermatology

John G Albertini, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Joel M Gelfand, MD, MSCE  Medical Director, Clinical Studies Unit, Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Associate Scholar, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania

Joel M Gelfand, MD, MSCE is a member of the following medical societies: Society for Investigative Dermatology

Disclosure: AMGEN Consulting fee Consulting; AMGEN Grant/research funds Investigator; Genentech Grant/research funds investigator; Centocor Consulting fee Consulting; Abbott Grant/research funds investigator; Abbott Consulting fee Consulting; Novartis investigator; Pfizer Grant/research funds investigator; Celgene Consulting fee DMC Chair; NIAMS and NHLBI Grant/research funds investigator

Chief Editor

Dirk M Elston, MD  Director, Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology, New York

Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author, Bobby Limmer, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Headington JT. Transverse microscopic anatomy of the human scalp. A basis for a morphometric approach to disorders of the hair follicle. Arch Dermatol. Apr 1984;120(4):449-56. [Medline].

  2. Orentreich N. Autografts in alopecias and other selected dermatological conditions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Nov 20 1959;83:463-79. [Medline].

  3. Vogel JE. Hair restoration complications: an approach to the unnatural-appearing hair transplant. Facial Plast Surg. Nov 2008;24(4):453-61. [Medline].

  4. Beehner M. Hairline design in hair replacement surgery. Facial Plast Surg. Nov 2008;24(4):389-403. [Medline].

  5. Rousso DE, Presti PM. Follicular unit transplantation. Facial Plast Surg. Nov 2008;24(4):381-8. [Medline].

  6. Sinclair R, Patel M, Dawson TL Jr, Yazdabadi A, Yip L, Perez A, et al. Hair loss in women: medical and cosmetic approaches to increase scalp hair fullness. Br J Dermatol. Dec 2011;165 Suppl 3:12-8. [Medline].

  7. Dua A, Dua K. Follicular unit extraction hair transplant. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. May 2010;3(2):76-81. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Limmer BL. Elliptical donor stereoscopically assisted micrografting as an approach to further refinement in hair transplantation. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Dec 1994;20(12):789-93. [Medline].

  9. Hamilton JB. Patterned loss of hair in man; types and incidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Mar 1951;53(3):708-28. [Medline].

  10. Seager D. Binocular stereoscopic dissecting microscoping-should we use them?. Hair Transplant Forum Int. 1996;6:2-5.

  11. Bunagan MJ, Pathomvanich D, Laorwong K. Recipient area folliculitis after follicular-unit transplantation: characterization of clinical features and analysis of associated factors. Dermatol Surg. Jul 2010;36(7):1161-5. [Medline].

  12. Bernstein RM, Rassman WR, Szaniawski W. Follicular transplantation. Int J Aesthetic Restor Surg. 1995;3:119-32.

  13. Bradshaw W, Unger WP, Nordstrom REA, eds. Quarter-grafts: a technique for minigrafts. In: Hair Transplantation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1988:333-51.

  14. Fujita K. Reconstruction of eyebrow. La Lepro. 1943;22:364.

  15. Limmer BL, Buchwach KA. Hair transplantation using follicular unit micrografting. Facial Plast Surg. 1999;7(4):523-35, viii.

  16. Marritt E. Single-hair transplantation for hairline refinement: a practical solution. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Dec 1984;10(12):962-6. [Medline].

  17. Nordstrom REA. "Micrografts" for improvement of the frontal hairline after transplantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1981;5:97-101.

  18. Norwood O. Follicular unit transplant. Hair Transplant Forum Int. 1998;8(2):10-11.

  19. Norwood O, Limmer BL. Advances in hair transplantation. Adv Dermatol. 1999;14:89-113; discussion 114. [Medline].

  20. Okuda S. [Clinical and experimental studies of transplantation of living hairs]. Jpn J Dermatol Urol. 1939;46:135-8.

  21. Stough DB 4th, Nelson BR, Stough DB 3rd. Incisional slit grafting. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Jan 1991;17(1):53-60. [Medline].

  22. Tamura H. Pubic hair transplantation. Jpn J Dermatol. 1943;53:76.

  23. Uebel CO. Micrografts and minigrafts: a new approach for baldness surgery. Ann Plast Surg. Nov 1991;27(5):476-87. [Medline].

  24. Vallis CP. Surgical treatment of the receding hairline. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1967;40(2):138-46. [Medline].

  25. Vallis CP. Surgical treatment of the receding hairline. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1969;44(3):271-8. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Pattern VI alopecia before and after follicular unit micrografting.
Dorsal view of pattern V alopecia before and after approximately 2000 follicular unit micrografts.
Comparison of donor densities. Left donor has 72 follicular units per cm2; right donor has 134 units per cm2.
Donor ellipse and sutured donor site.
Margin of donor ellipse and follicular unit micrografts of 1, 2, and 3 hairs.
Eyebrow transplantation. Left is preoperative. Right is after 400 follicular unit micrografts.
Close-up view of frontal hairline before and after micrografts.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.