eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Surgical

Varicose Veins Treated With Ambulatory Phlebectomy

Author: Robert Weiss, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Coauthor(s): Albert-Adrien Ramelet, MD, Specialist in Dermatology and Angiology, Switzerland
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Nov 16, 2009

Introduction

Ambulatory phlebectomy permits removal of incompetent veins below the saphenofemoral and saphenopopliteal junctions, not including the proximal great or short saphenous veins. The junctions themselves cannot be treated with simple phlebectomy because junctional reflux must be addressed by endovenous ablation methods, which allow saphenous reflux to be addressed. Veins that may be removed by ambulatory phlebectomy include major tributaries such as the anterolateral vein, pudendal vein, and branches of the saphenous vein around and below the knee. Perforators and reticular veins may also be addressed, with rarely including small reticular veins associated with telangiectasias.

Skin incisions as small as 1 mm or needle punctures using an 18-gauge needle or larger are used to extract veins with a phlebectomy hook. The procedure is well tolerated by patients under local anesthesia and typically produces good cosmetic results. Long-term results from the authors’ experience are excellent as long as the most proximal source of reflux is eliminated by endovenous ablation techniques. In contrast to sclerotherapy of large varicose veins, ambulatory phlebectomy minimizes the risks of intra-arterial injection, skin necrosis, and residual hyperpigmentation. The source vein is extracted by the procedure.

Traditional venous ligation is no longer considered an acceptable method because the vein is interrupted rather than removed, leading to relatively high recurrence rates. With ambulatory phlebectomy, the small size of the skin incision or puncture usually results in little or no scarring. Only performed under local anesthesia, ambulatory phlebectomy leads to greatly reduced surgical risks compared with traditional surgery for truncal (axial), reticular varicose veins and incompetent perforators.

This vein on the calf represents a major varicose...

This vein on the calf represents a major varicose tributary of the lesser saphenous vein that was removed by means of ambulatory phlebectomy.

This vein on the calf represents a major varicose...

This vein on the calf represents a major varicose tributary of the lesser saphenous vein that was removed by means of ambulatory phlebectomy.


History of the Procedure

Cornelius Celsus first described phlebectomy in 45 CE. The earliest phlebectomy hooks were described in 1545, as illustrated in the Textbook of Surgery authored by W.H. Ryff. Dr Robert Muller, a Swiss dermatologist in private practice in Neuchâtel, Switzerland, rediscovered the technique in 1956. He developed his own technique and instruments and taught the technique to hundreds of physicians.1,2,3 Dr A.A. Ramelet, former president of the Swiss Society of Phlebology, was one of Dr Muller's students who further advanced the technique for smaller reticular veins with his own hooks.4,5,6 Today the technique is practiced by thousands of phlebologists around the world.

Problem

The incidence of varicose veins is estimated to be 25% of the white population.

Frequency

Incidence is higher with age and with female hormonal environment.

Pathophysiology

Venous insufficiency is caused by a refluxing circuit that results from failure of the primary valves at the saphenofemoral junction and typically leads to superficial varicose veins. Varicose veins that branch off an incompetent saphenous vein are called branch veins or secondary varicosities. The typical signs and symptoms of venous insufficiency, including ankle edema, stasis dermatitis, and possibly ulceration, may occur when varicose veins are untreated. The most important aspect of pathophysiology is the origin point of reflux and its elimination. Only then can branch varicosities be treated.

Presentation

Detailed vein and ultrasonography examination is obligatory prior to treatment being administered. Careful attention must be paid to the patient's medical history and to the general state of the patient, and any contraindications to local anesthesia or the surgical procedure itself must be identified.

The integrity of the deep venous system and the proper function of the calf muscle pump should be ensured. In addition, preoperative clinical and ultrasonographic examinations are essential to detect and map all types of the varicosities and their origins. Duplex ultrasonography mapping of the source of reverse flow or reflux is typically performed, especially with the high availability of highly portable and high-resolution ultrasonography devices. Important sources of reflux (eg, saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junctions) should be corrected before any effort is made to address end-branch disease with ambulatory phlebectomy.

Indications

Although any branch varicosity can be removed by means of hook extraction, inexperienced physicians should be careful to avoid the popliteal fold, the dorsum of the foot, and the prepatellar and pretibial areas. These regions are more susceptible to injury, and they contain veins that can be more difficult to extract.

Veins most readily treated with phlebectomy include branch varicosities of the great and short saphenous veins, pudendal veins in the groin, and reticular varices in the popliteal fold or lateral part of the thigh. Phlebectomy can also be used as an immediate treatment for small segments of superficial phlebitis because the intravascular coagulum is expressed and the involved vein segment can be extracted through the same incision.

Large, tortuous distal branch varicosities are typically treated by using ambulatory phlebectomy but some large branch varicosities may be rarely treated by endovenous ablation techniques. Ambulatory phlebectomy is best for tortuous varicosities. Radiofrequency ablation catheters or optical laser fibers cannot easily be passed along a tortuous vein. Large, tortuous varicosities can also be treated by foam sclerotherapy in which a detergent sclerosant, such as 1-3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate, is agitated with air. Physician assessment of the thickness of the vein wall can be the determining factor in terms of use of ambulatory phlebectomy versus foam sclerotherapy, the latter being reserved for thinner-walled veins.

Contraindications

Contraindications to ambulatory phlebectomy are reflux at the saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junctions. These junctions must be treated by other means such as endovenous radiofrequency or laser ablation.

More on Varicose Veins Treated With Ambulatory Phlebectomy

Overview: Varicose Veins Treated With Ambulatory Phlebectomy
Workup: Varicose Veins Treated With Ambulatory Phlebectomy
Treatment: Varicose Veins Treated With Ambulatory Phlebectomy
Follow-up: Varicose Veins Treated With Ambulatory Phlebectomy
Multimedia: Varicose Veins Treated With Ambulatory Phlebectomy
References

References

  1. Muller R. [Ambulatory phlebectomy]. Ther Umsch. Jul 1992;49(7):447-50. [Medline].

  2. Muller R. [Treatment of foot varices by ambulatory phlebectomy]. Phlebologie. Apr-Jun 1990;43(2):317-8. [Medline].

  3. Muller R. [Treatment of varicose external saphenous vein by ambulatory phlebectomy]. Phlebologie. Jul-Oct 1991;44(3):687-92. [Medline].

  4. Ramelet AA. Complications of ambulatory phlebectomy. Dermatol Surg. Oct 1997;23(10):947-54. [Medline].

  5. Ramelet AA. Phlebectomy. Technique, indications and complications. Int Angiol. Jun 2002;21(2 Suppl 1):46-51. [Medline].

  6. Ramelet AA, Perrin M, Kern P, Bounameaux H. Phlebology. 5th ed. Paris, France: Elsevier Science; 2008.

  7. Cohn MS, Seiger E, Goldman S. Ambulatory phlebectomy using the tumescent technique for local anesthesia. Dermatol Surg. Apr 1995;21(4):315-8. [Medline].

  8. Smith SR, Goldman MP. Tumescent anesthesia in ambulatory phlebectomy. Dermatol Surg. Apr 1998;24(4):453-6. [Medline].

  9. Hubmer MG, Koch H, Haas FM, Horn M, Sankin O, Scharnagl E. Necrotizing fasciitis after ambulatory phlebectomy performed with use of tumescent anesthesia. J Vasc Surg. Jan 2004;39(1):263-5. [Medline].

  10. Fays-Michel S, Vieu C, Trechot P, Mazet J, Cuny JF, Barbaud A. [Cutaneous necrosis following ambulatory phlebectomy: the role of sodium bicarbonate used in local anaesthesia]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. Jan 2007;134(1):76-7. [Medline].

  11. Alonzo U, Ruffolo F, Leonardi L, Sadighi A, Garavello A. [Ambulatory phlebectomy. Literature review and personal experience]. Minerva Cardioangiol. Apr 1997;45(4):121-9. [Medline].

  12. De Roos KP, Neumann HA. Muller's ambulatory phlebectomy for varicose veins of the foot. Dermatol Surg. Apr 1998;24(4):465-70. [Medline].

  13. de Roos KP, Nieman FH, Neumann HA. Ambulatory phlebectomy versus compression sclerotherapy: results of a randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Surg. Mar 2003;29(3):221-6. [Medline].

  14. Ferrara G, Meloni V, Annessi M, Barone E, Spadaro O, Vitale S, et al. [Ambulatory phlebectomy with Muller procedure in the treatment of lower limb varices. Indications, technique and long-term results]. Minerva Chir. Jul-Aug 1995;50(7-8):681-5. [Medline].

  15. Garde C. Ambulatory phlebectomy. Dermatol Surg. Jul 1995;21(7):628-30. [Medline].

  16. Neumann HA. Ambulant minisurgical phlebectomy. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Jan 1992;18(1):53-4. [Medline].

  17. Oesch A. [Indications for and results of ambulatory varices therapy]. Ther Umsch. Oct 1991;48(10):692-6. [Medline].

  18. Olivencia JA. Ambulatory phlebectomy of the foot. Review of 75 patients. Dermatol Surg. Apr 1997;23(4):279-80. [Medline].

  19. Olivencia JA. Ambulatory phlebectomy turned 2400 years old. Dermatol Surg. May 2004;30(5):704-8; discussion 708. [Medline].

  20. Olivencia JA. Minimally invasive vein surgery: ambulatory phlebectomy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. Sep 2003;6(3):121-4. [Medline].

  21. Ramelet AA. [Ambulatory phlebectomy by the Muller method: technique, advantages, and disadvantages]. J Mal Vasc. 1991;16(2):119-22. [Medline].

  22. Ramelet AA. [An unusual complication of ambulatory phlebectomy. Talc granuloma]. Phlebologie. Nov-Dec 1991;44(4):865-71. [Medline].

  23. Sadick NS. Advances in the treatment of varicose veins: ambulatory phlebectomy, foam sclerotherapy, endovascular laser, and radiofrequency closure. Dermatol Clin. Jul 2005;23(3):443-55, vi. [Medline].

  24. Sadick NS, Wasser S. Combined endovascular laser with ambulatory phlebectomy for the treatment of superficial venous incompetence: a 2-year perspective. J Cosmet Laser Ther. May 2004;6(1):44-9. [Medline].

  25. Stio F, Giacomelli L, Minocchi L, De Vita M, Iavarone C, Gallinacci E, et al. [Ambulatory phlebectomy: our experience]. G Chir. Oct 1995;16(10):459-60. [Medline].

  26. Weiss RA, Dover JS. Leg vein management: sclerotherapy, ambulatory phlebectomy, and laser surgery. Semin Cutan Med Surg. Mar 2002;21(1):76-103. [Medline].

  27. Weiss RA, Goldman MP. Transillumination mapping prior to ambulatory phlebectomy. Dermatol Surg. Apr 1998;24(4):447-50. [Medline].

  28. Weiss RA, Weiss MA. Ambulatory phlebectomy compared to sclerotherapy for varicose and telangiectatic veins: indications and complications. Adv Dermatol. 1996;11:3-16; discussion 17. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

ambulatory phlebectomy, varicose vein ambulatory phlebectomy, varicose vein treatment, stab avulsion of varicose veins, phlebectomy hooks, venous insufficiency, reflux circuit, superficial varicose veins, varicose branches, venous valve failure, stasis dermatitis, superficial phlebitis, hook avulsion of varicose veins

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Robert Weiss, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Robert Weiss, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery, American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Phlebology, American Dermatological Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, and MedChi
Disclosure: Angiodynamics Honoraria Speaking and teaching; CoolTouch Corp Intellectual property rights Consulting; Cynosure Grant/research funds Independent contractor; Palomar Grant/research funds Independent contractor

Coauthor(s)

Albert-Adrien Ramelet, MD, Specialist in Dermatology and Angiology, Switzerland
Disclosure: Servier Honoraria Speaking and teaching; OM Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Medical Editor

Désirée Ratner, MD, Director of Dermatologic Surgery, Professor of Clinical Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital
Désirée Ratner, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

David F Butler, MD, Professor of Dermatology, Texas A&M University College of Medicine; Chair, Department of Dermatology, Director, Dermatology Residency Training Program, Scott and White Clinic, Northside Clinic
David F Butler, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, American Society for MOHS Surgery, Association of Military Dermatologists, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

John G Albertini, MD, Consulting Staff, Dermatologic Surgery, The Skin Surgery Center; Program Director, ACGME accredited Fellowship in Procedural Dermatology
John G Albertini, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Glen H Crawford, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Chief, Division of Dermatology, The Pennsylvania Hospital
Glen H Crawford, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society of USAF Flight Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Dirk M Elston, MD, Director, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.