eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Surgical

Transposition Flaps

Author: Vandana Chatrath, MD, Consultant in Dermatology, Delhi Dermatology Group, India
Coauthor(s): Thomas Rohrer, MD, Director of Dermatologic Surgery, Associate Professor; Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 26, 2009

Introduction

Flaps are defined as skin and subcutaneous tissue with an intact vascular supply moved to cover an adjacent primary defect.

History of the Procedure

Flaps typically are used in certain instances to take advantage of greater laxity in adjacent tissue, to change the direction of tension in the wound closure, or to camouflage a scar line. Simple linear closures are easier to perform, generally have lower complication rates than flaps and grafts, and typically leave an aesthetic linear or curvilinear scar. In addition, certain wounds (eg, those in concave areas such as the inner canthus or conchal bowl) do extremely well with second intention healing. Therefore, before the decision is made to close a surgical defect with a flap or graft, these other options must be considered. If a wound will not heal well by second intention and a linear closure will create too much tension, distort anatomic structures, or leave an unacceptable scar, flaps and grafts must be considered. Surgeons must not be too hesitant or too eager to use flaps. When used in the appropriate situation, a flap may offer the best aesthetic result.

Flap categorization

Flaps can be categorized according to several different criteria:

  • Location
    • Local flaps come from within the same or an adjacent cosmetic unit.
    • Distant flaps are transposed over intervening skin of one or more cosmetic units and, therefore, are from nonadjacent skin. These are completed in 2 stages; the pedicle is severed and returned to its initial position only when the local blood supply in the flap is developed.
    • Free flaps are a combination of flaps and grafts. They share the characteristics of both because they are excised at a distant site with a major blood supply and harvested as a graft by severing them completely from the skin. Then, the artery is anastomosed to a major vessel in the surrounding skin. Thus, although skin is separated completely from its source (as in a graft), it carries its own blood supply, analogous to a flap.
  • Blood supply
    • Axial pattern (arterial) flaps are flaps in which the blood supply to the flap is through a major vessel that is preserved when the flap is raised and the vessel is moved with it to cover the defect.
    • Random pattern (cutaneous) flaps are flaps in which the subdermal vascular plexus is the source of the blood supply to the flap; these flaps are raised below the subcutaneous fat to preserve the plexus.
  • Primary tissue movement
    • Advancement flap (see Media File 1a): These are flaps that involve advancement or linear slide of adjacent tissue to cover a primary tissue defect. Classic advancement flaps have the advantage of altering the position and location of a portion of the scar that may have been produced by a linear closure.
    • Rotation flaps (see Media File 1b): These are flaps in which the tissue is rotated around a pivot point (arcuate slide) to cover a primary defect. Rotation flaps fill one defect by creating another defect that may be closed with less tension or distortion. Tension is redirected and redistributed.
    • Transposition flaps (see Media File 1c): When the flap is carried (rotated) over an intervening area of normal skin to be placed in its recipient site, it is known as a transposition flap. Like rotation flaps, transposition flaps exploit skin laxity at a site distant to the surgical defect and redirect the tension of closure. Transposition flaps are generally smaller and freer in their movement than rotation flaps.

Indications

Transposition flaps

Transposition flaps take advantage of regional laxity by mobilizing tissue from an adjacent area of excess laxity (see Media File 2) into the area without slack (see Media File 3).

Transposition flaps have the following advantages:

  • They accomplish redistribution and redirection of tension.
  • They tend to be smaller in size than advancement and rotation flaps.
  • Resultant scars are geometric broken lines that may be less conspicuous and tend to be easy to hide.

Types of transposition flaps

Many different types of transposition flaps exist, with an innumerable amount of variations. The most commonly used transposition flaps include the following:

  • Classic rhombic flap, as described by Limberg in 1963
  • Modified rhombic flaps, such as the Webster 30° angle and the Dufourmentel flap
  • Banner-type flaps, such as the nasolabial transposition flap and the bilobed flap
  • Tunneled transposition flap (for deep defects of the nasal ala)

Transposition flap as a modification of island pedicle flap

Island pedicle flaps, by definition, are incised and completely separated from the surrounding skin except for the underlying pedicle that lies inferior to the flap. These closures are typically rotational or advancement in nature, which are effective for defects that are adjacent and require only sliding of the flap into place. However, for noncontiguous defects, island pedicle flaps are not an option. A modification of the island pedicle flap is a transposition movement. This enables repair of difficult and nonadjacent areas with sparing of normal tissue, allowing closure of the defect with noncontiguous but similar tissue and camouflage of scars into natural skin tension lines.

Relevant Anatomy

Uses of rhombic flap1,2,3,4

Although each patient must be evaluated individually, rhombic transposition flaps provide outstanding cosmetic and functional reconstruction options in certain classic areas of the face. These areas include the following (see Media File 21):

  • Dorsum of the nose and the nasal sidewall: The use of surrounding skin in transposition flaps helps maintain optimal color and texture match. Keeping the mobile free margins of the eyelid and nasal ala in mind during the planning of flaps in this area is important. Any closure that distorts these in any way is unacceptable. Tension vectors should be directed away from these areas. The nasal tip is also mobile and should be considered in the closure of nasal defects. However, the tip ptosis that frequently occurs with increasing age may be corrected aesthetically with some closures (see Media Files 21-25).
  • Inner and outer canthus: Because of the proximity to neighboring mobile anatomic structures, such as the eyelids, redirection of the tension vectors by optimal orientation of the transposition flaps prevents distortion of these structures after closure of the defect. The acute angles of the folds (crow's feet) in the outer canthus offer excellent lines to hide the acute angles generated by transposition flaps.
  • Temple: Transposition flaps use the reservoir of excess skin over the cheeks, temple, and preauricular areas to repair large defects over the temple where primary closure may not be possible.
  • Cheeks: Because the skin of the cheek is richly vascular due to the favorable blood supply from the subdermal plexus, the viability of transposition flaps is less critical, which may be used to create scars as geometric broken lines that tend to be well camouflaged within the skin creases. Transposition flaps typically are designed laterally and with the redundant tissue inferior to the primary defect. This keeps the scar in a lateral position, and the inferiorly based flap maintains optimal lymphatic drainage to help prevent pin-cushioning (see Media Files 26-29).
  • Perioral: Using the laxity of the adjacent cheek and hiding scars in the various folds and normal wrinkles in this area make transposition flaps a good option (see Media Files 30-33).
  • Chin: Transposition flaps may use neighboring areas of regional laxity and reservoirs of skin, such as the skin of the submandibular area and neck, to good advantage in the closure of selected defects (see Media Files 34-37).

Banner-type transposition flaps5

The classic banner-type transposition flap is a finger-shaped random pattern (cutaneous) flap that makes use of areas of adjacent laxity. This flap allows for the placement of a long linear secondary scar in a skin fold or crease or along the junction of 2 cosmetic units. This type of flap most commonly is used in the following areas:

  • Ala: The classic nasolabial transposition flap is used.
  • Superior helix
    • The banner flap is taken behind the superior aspect of the ear. Reconstruction of the upper one third of the ear may be achieved using several strategies such as full-thickness skin grafts, wedge resection with subsequent primary closure, helical advancement flaps, multistage preauricular or postauricular tubed flaps, and one-stage preauricular or postauricular transposition flaps.6
    • When defects are smaller than 1.5 cm, wedge conversion of the defect followed by primary closure is aptly suited without distortion of the anatomy. However, when the defect is 1.5-2.5 cm, the best choice is helical advancement flap. For helical defects greater than 2.5 cm, a multistaged tubed flap (anterior or posterior) is considered.
    • To reconstruct a similarly sized defect, a postauricular transposition flap can be performed as a single-stage procedure. The anterior edge of the flap is cut along the retroauricular sulcus. The flap is designed to have a length-to-width ratio of 1:4 (exceeding the length of the defect). A burrow triangle is added to the flap to allow easy closure of the secondary defect by tapering the tip of the secondary defect. Because the postauricular skin is thin, undermining should be done with care. After trimming the flap to fit the defect, the first suture is placed at the tip of the flap and secured to the remaining helix with a vertical mattress suture to allow good eversion and avoid notching of the rim. The rest of the flap is then sewn into place with routine simple interrupted sutures.
    • A cartilage graft may be harvested from the opposite ear to re-form the rim if there is significant cartilage loss in the primary defect. The possibility of a trapdoor deformity may be desired here to some extent because it would help to recreate the natural helical rim contour. Therefore, an anteriorly or posteriorly placed transposition flap can be effectively used for reconstruction of superior helical rim defects located proximally, enabling a single-stage procedure in place of a multistage interpolation flap.
  • Medial anterior ear (ie, concha, tragus, crus of the helix): The banner flap is taken in the preauricular area (see Media Files 38-41).

Bilobed flap7,8,9,10,11

The bilobed flap is a double-lobed modification of the banner transposition flap described above. The principle of transposing skin from an area of laxity remains the same; however, the transfer of tissue is in 2 steps and allows the donor skin to be at a greater distance from the recipient area.

The basic motion of the flap is that of rotation. Each lobe of the flap is tethered to a cutaneous pedicle, which creates the same pivotal restraint on the movement of the flap as a rotation flap.

There are 2 important variables in the construction of a bilobed flap, namely, the flap length and the flap angle, which relate to each other directly. Greater angles of rotation require longer flaps to overcome the pivotal restraint. Typically, the first lobe of the flap is designed to be equal to the width of the original defect. If the location of the primary defect is in an area that allows secondary motion, the first lobe may be designed up to 20% smaller than the primary defect. The primary lobe can be thinned if bulky; however, deepening the defect may be preferable to thinning the lobe, thus increasing the risk of flap necrosis.

The second lobe also may be designed smaller because tension can be shared by closure of the defect created by the second lobe. In addition, the second lobe of the flap is constructed with an elliptical tip to facilitate side-to-side closure of the tertiary defect. The movement of the flap is facilitated through wide undermining around the flap, especially at the pedicle. The undermining is deep and wide just above the level of the perichondrium or periosteum. In this way, the muscle remains attached to the base of the pedicle ensuring a rich vascular supply (see Media File 49).

A modification of the original bilobed flap was described by Zitelli in 1988 (see Media File 50) and is the most used design of the bilobed flap.12 In this, a triangle or a dog-ear cone is designed along one side of the circular defect, orienting the line of closure along the resting skin tension lines or a cosmetic unit junction line without the distortion of neighboring free margins. This has the advantage of maintaining a rich vascular supply to the flap because this does not cut into the base of the defect. Also, it prevents a secondary procedure to remove the standing cutaneous deformity (dog-ear) that occurs at the point of rotation.

An arc is then extended from the defect tip up to 90°, and the 2 lobes of the flap are drawn along this arc (see Media File 51). The 2 lobes should be separated by an angle of 30-45° to limit the size of the dog-ear and to reduce the risk of pin-cushioning (see Media Files 52-53). Because some degree of pivotal restraint is created by the motion of rotation and the lobes may be shortened slightly in the rotation, the first lobe of this flap may be designed to extend beyond the arc (see Media File 54).

Thus, as the flap is rotated and transposed into position, the lengthened lobe fits into the primary defect without any tension (see Media Files 55-56). The lobes should be inset or flush with the adjacent skin. A tacking suture may be placed in the defect to the underside of the primary lobe to avoid trapdooring.

The bilobed flap is particularly suited for reconstruction of the defects located over the following areas (see Media Files 57):

Transposition island pedicle flap

This is best used over the following areas:

  • Nasal side wall
  • Nasal ala
  • Alar grooves

Extranasal applications of the bilobed flap

The novelty of the bilobed flap as it is used for extranasal reconstruction is that the surgeon has some degree of variance in designing the size of the individual lobules of the flap, with a lower risk of secondary tissue distortion. The flap must be carefully designed to place the incision lines as closed to the relaxed skin tension lines as possible, and a meticulous suture technique is important for camouflaging the complex suture line of this flap. Importantly, keep in mind that the extranasal bilobed flap's vascular support may be reduced compared with nasal sites. The extranasal sites where the bilobed flap may be used are as follows:

  • Lower lip
  • Chin: Particular attention must be given to avoiding damage to the marginal mandibular nerve during execution of this reconstructive technique.
  • Medial cheek: To eliminate the transfer of hair into a reconstructed surgical wound, the surgeon may thin the flap and destroy the hair bulbs at the time of flap insertion; to avoid flap necrosis, avoid excessively thinning the distal portion of the flap.
  • Ear lobule
  • Dorsum of the hand: The secondary lobule of the flap in this case may be somewhat undersized compared with the design of the flap used in nasal reconstruction.

Tunneled transposition flap

The tunneled transposition flap is a single-staged flap for the repair of deep defects of the nasal ala that do not lend themselves to skin graft repairs. When a decision is made by the surgeon to use this particular flap, 2 important considerations must be addressed. First, the defect should be limited to the nasal ala entirely in order to achieve a good aesthetic outcome, because recreating the alar crease is impossible with this flap. Second, the alar defect must be deep because this flap requires a pedicle, and, if the depth of the defect is not enough to fit the pedicle, the result would be a pin-cushion deformity. Additionally, if an attempt is made to thin the pedicle in order to fit the defect, the blood supply to the flap may be compromised. Therefore, if the alar defect is shallow, a full-thickness skin graft is the ideal choice or else the defect has to be deepened.

The flap is planned such that it lies along the melolabial fold so that the secondary defect is closed along a natural cosmetic line. The major advantage of this flap over a banner-type flap is that with the tunneling, the alar crease is entirely preserved.

Contraindications

Smoking, aspirin, and anticoagulant use are relative contraindications to the use of transposition flaps because they interfere with the healing of the flaps and, therefore, increase the incidence of flap necrosis. Herbal supplements containing such substances as gingko biloba also have some anticoagulant activity. The use of these substances should be addressed at the time of preoperative evaluation so that they may be discontinued a few weeks prior to surgery if it needs to be performed.

More on Transposition Flaps

Overview: Transposition Flaps
Treatment: Transposition Flaps
Follow-up: Transposition Flaps
Multimedia: Transposition Flaps
References

References

  1. Borges AF. The rhombic flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1981;67(4):458-66. [Medline].

  2. Bray DA. Clinical applications of the rhomboid flap. Arch Otolaryngol. Jan 1983;109(1):37-42. [Medline].

  3. Fee WE Jr, Gunter JP, Carder HM. Rhomboid flap principles and common variations. Laryngoscope. Nov 1976;86(11):1706-11. [Medline].

  4. Larrabee WF Jr, Trachy R, Sutton D, Cox K. Rhomboid flap dynamics. Arch Otolaryngol. Dec 1981;107(12):755-7. [Medline].

  5. Masson JK, Mendelson BC. The banner flap. Am J Surg. Sep 1977;134(3):419-23. [Medline].

  6. Fortier-Riberdy G, Gloster HM. Reconstruction of the superior helical rim with a postauricular transposition flap. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2005;31(1):99-101. [Medline].

  7. Aasi SZ, Leffell DJ. Bilobed transposition flap. Dermatol Clin. Jan 2005;23(1):55-64, vi. [Medline].

  8. Cook JL. Reconstructive utility of the bilobed flap: lessons from flap successes and failures. Dermatol Surg. Aug 2005;31(8 Pt 2):1024-33. [Medline].

  9. McGregor JC, Soutar DS. A critical assessment of the bilobed flap. Br J Plast Surg. Apr 1981;34(2):197-205. [Medline].

  10. Morgan BL, Samiian MR. Advantages of the bilobed flap for closure of small defects of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1973;52(1):35-7. [Medline].

  11. Ricks M, Cook J. Extranasal applications of the bilobed flap. Dermatol Surg. Aug 2005;31(8 Pt 1):941-8. [Medline].

  12. Zitelli JA. The bilobed flap for nasal reconstruction. Arch Dermatol. Jul 1989;125(7):957-9. [Medline].

  13. Webster RC, Davidson TM, Smith RC. The thirty degree transposition flap. Laryngoscope. Jan 1978;88(1 Pt 1):85-94. [Medline].

  14. Lister GD, Gibson T. Closure of rhomboid skin defects: the flaps of Limberg and Dufourmentel. Br J Plast Surg. Jul 1972;25(3):300-14. [Medline].

  15. Hairston BR, Nguyen TH. Innovations in the island pedicle flap for cutaneous facial reconstruction. Dermatol Surg. Apr 2003;29(4):378-85. [Medline].

  16. Borges AF. Choosing the correct Limberg flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1978;62(4):542-5. [Medline].

  17. Brobyn TJ, Cramer LM, Hulnick SJ, Kodsi MS. Facial resurfacing with the Limberg flap. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1976;3(3):481-90. [Medline].

  18. Jun-Hui L, Xin X, Tian-Xiang O. Subcutaneous Pedicle Limberg Flap for Facial Reconstruction. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:949-952.

  19. Koranda FC, Webster RC. Trapdoor effect in nasolabial flaps. Causes and corrections. Arch Otolaryngol. Jul 1985;111(7):421-4. [Medline].

  20. Webster RC, Benjamin BJ, Smith RC. Treatment of "trap door deformity.". Laryngoscope. Apr 1978;88(4):707-12. [Medline].

  21. Rotunda AM, Bennett RG. Nasal tip wound repair using a rhombic transposition flap with a double Z-plasty at its base. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:945-947.

  22. Bauer BS, Margulis A. The expanded transposition flap: shifting paradigms based on experience gained from two decades of pediatric tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2004;114(1):98-106. [Medline].

  23. Converse JM, ed. Reconstructive Plastic Surgery: General Principles. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1977:202-7.

  24. Davidson TM, Webster RC, Gordon BR. The Principles and Dynamics of Local Skin Flaps. Chicago, Ill: American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; 1983.

  25. Dzubow LM. The dynamics of flap movement: effect of pivotal restraint on flap rotation and transposition. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Dec 1987;13(12):1348-53. [Medline].

  26. Grabb WC, Myers MB, eds. Skin Flaps. Boston, Mass: Little Brown & Company; 1975:111-31.

  27. Krishnan RS, Clark DP, Donnelly HB. Tunneled transposition flap for reconstruction of defects of the nasal ala. Dermatol Surg. Dec 2007;33(12):1496-501. [Medline].

  28. Limberg AA. Design of local flaps. In: Gibson T, ed. Modern Trends of Plastic Surgery. London, England: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1966:38-61.

  29. Rohrer TE, Bhatia A. Transposition flaps in cutaneous surgery. Dermatol Surg. Aug 2005;31(8 Pt 2):1014-23. [Medline].

  30. Rossi A, Jeffs JV. The rhomboid flap of Limberg--a simple aid to planning. Ann Plast Surg. Dec 1980;5(6):494-6. [Medline].

  31. Webster RC, Benjamin BJ, Smith RC. Closure of circular defects. Laryngoscope. Mar 1978;88(3):534-8. [Medline].

  32. Yanai A, Ueda K, Takato T. Flexible rhombic flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1986;78(2):228-35. [Medline].

  33. Yotsuyanagi T, Yamashita K, Urushidate S, et al. Reconstruction of large nasal defects with a combination of local flaps based on the aesthetic subunit principle. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 2001;107(6):1358-62. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

transposition flaps, facial reconstruction, repairing defects with transposition flaps, bilobed flaps, rhombic flaps, rhomboid flaps, Dufourmentel flaps, banner-type flaps, nasolabial transposition flaps, island pedicle flaps, transposition island pedicle flaps, Webster flaps

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Vandana Chatrath, MD, Consultant in Dermatology, Delhi Dermatology Group, India
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Thomas Rohrer, MD, Director of Dermatologic Surgery, Associate Professor; Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine
Thomas Rohrer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, and American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Désirée Ratner, MD, Director of Dermatologic Surgery, Professor of Clinical Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital
Désirée Ratner, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

David F Butler, MD, Professor of Dermatology, Texas A&M University College of Medicine; Chair, Department of Dermatology, Director, Dermatology Residency Training Program, Scott and White Clinic
David F Butler, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, American Society for MOHS Surgery, Association of Military Dermatologists, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

John G Albertini, MD, Consulting Staff, Dermatologic Surgery, The Skin Surgery Center
John G Albertini, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Catherine Quirk, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Brown University
Catherine Quirk, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Dirk M Elston, MD, Director, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center
Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.