Dermatologic Manifestations of Enteroviral Infections Workup
- Author: Susanna Nogués-Siuraneta, MD; Chief Editor: Dirk M Elston, MD more...
Laboratory Studies
Enteroviral infections are diagnosed mainly on the basis of clinical features; however, a specific diagnosis of enterovirus infection requires detection of the virus in patient samples. In some cases, complementary tests may be useful.
- Serologic studies
- The detection of virus-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay can aid diagnosis; however, because it is time-consuming to obtain results using this technique, it may be of limited value in a clinical setting.
- Serum samples should be obtained during the acute phase of the disease because IgM antibodies rapidly disappear.
- The antibodies are usually group specific and not type specific.
- No universal antibody or antigen assay exists because no single antigen is present in all enterovirus serotypes.[2]
- Serology has no role in routine diagnosis.
- Cell culture
- Cell culture may allow isolation of the virus.
- Samples may be obtained from the blood, stool, pharyngeal secretions, or vesicular fluid. Some reports suggest that the best results are achieved when samples are collected from the upper respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, or cerebrospinal fluid.[2]
- The most specific findings are found in samples from blood and blister fluid. Findings in fecal specimens are least specific because enteroviruses may be shed for weeks after acute infection and can be detected well after the clinical illness has resolved. A 2007 study revealed that a throat culture plus a culture of 2 sterile vesicles (or from the rectum if no sterile vesicles are present) may have the highest yield for detecting enterovirus 71 in persons with hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD).[17]
- Although enteroviruses take 4-8 days to grow and results are usually not available in sufficient time to impact treatment of the patient, culture remains an important epidemiologic tool. Viral culture allows the clinician to isolate and identify the serotype of the virus causing disease.
- Polymerase chain reaction
- The reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has made enteroviral subtyping possible and has increase the enterovirus detection rate, especially in the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid.
- PCR techniques require small amounts of clinical material and are rapid (within 5-24 h of receipt of the sample), sensitive, and specific. PCR is superior to viral culture for the diagnosis of many enterovirus infections, particularly enteroviral meningitis.[18] Specimen sources are the same as those for cell cultures, as outlined above.
- Commercial enterovirus PCR tests are available.
- Because of their extreme sensitivity, PCR tests are subject to false-positive results due to contamination and to false-negative results due to levels below assay detection.
- Enterovirus PCR provides the potential for a reduction in unnecessary hospitalization and diagnostic or therapeutic interventions.
- Real-time RT-PCR assays permit shorter turnover times, especially for the detection of enterovirus RNA.[19]
Histologic Findings
In most cases, histopathologic findings are nonspecific and are not necessary for diagnosis.
When histopathologic examination is performed to evaluate HFMD, findings may include spongiosis, intraepidermal vesicles that contain neutrophils and mononuclear cells, and some necrotic keratinocytes.[20, 21, 22] Edema and a perivascular infiltrate composed of lymphocytes and neutrophils may be seen in the dermis.
In eruptive pseudoangiomatosis (EP), lesions are composed of dilated superficial vessels with plump endothelial cells. The lesions are easily distinguished from true angiomas because the number of vessels is not increased.
Trallero G, Avellon A, Otero A, et al. Enteroviruses in Spain over the decade 1998-2007: virological and epidemiological studies. J Clin Virol. Feb 2010;47(2):170-6. [Medline].
Tebruegge M, Curtis N. Enterovirus infections in neonates. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. Aug 2009;14(4):222-7. [Medline].
Oberste M, Schnurr D, Maher K, al-Busaidy S, Pallansch M. Molecular identification of new picornaviruses and characterization of a proposed enterovirus 73 serotype. J Gen Virol. Feb 2001;82:409-16. [Medline].
Oberste MS, Michele SM, Maher K, et al. Molecular identification and characterization of two proposed new enterovirus serotypes, EV74 and EV75. J Gen Virol. Nov 2004;85:3205-12. [Medline].
Norder H, Bjerregaard L, Magnius L, Lina B, Aymard M, Chomel JJ. Sequencing of 'untypable' enteroviruses reveals two new types, EV-77 and EV-78, within human enterovirus type B and substitutions in the BC loop of the VP1 protein for known types. J Gen Virol. Apr 2003;84:827-36. [Medline].
Chia JK. The role of enterovirus in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Clin Pathol. Nov 2005;58(11):1126-32. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Bowles NE, Dubowitz V, Sewry CA, Archard LC. Dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and Coxsackie-B-virus infection. Lancet. May 2 1987;1(8540):1004-7. [Medline].
Robinson CR, Doane FW, Rhodes AJ. Report of an outbreak of febrile illness with pharyngeal lesions and exanthem: Toronto, summer 1957; isolation of group A Coxsackie virus. Can Med Assoc J. Oct 15 1958;79(8):615-21. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Alsop J, Flewett TH, Foster JR. "Hand-foot-and-mouth disease" in Birmingham in 1959. Br Med J. Dec 10 1960;2(5214):1708-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Enterovirus surveillance--United States, 1997-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Oct 13 2000;49(40):913-6. [Medline].
Prose NS, Tope W, Miller SE, Kamino H. Eruptive pseudoangiomatosis: a unique childhood exanthem?. J Am Acad Dermatol. Nov 1993;29(5 Pt 2):857-9. [Medline].
Mirkovic RR, Kono R, Yin-Murphy M, Sohier R, Schmidt NJ, Melnick JL. Enterovirus type 70: the etiologic agent of pandemic acute haemorrhagic conjunctivitis. Bull World Health Organ. 1973;49(4):341-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Mirkovic RR, Schmidt NJ, Yin-Murphy M, Melnick JL. Enterovirus etiology of the 1970 Singapore epidemic of acute conjunctivitis. Intervirology. 1974;4(2):119-27. [Medline].
Yaffee HS. Erythema multiforme caused by Coxsackie B5. A possible association with epidemic pustular stomatitis of children. Arch Dermatol. Nov 1960;82:737-9. [Medline].
Jaidane H, Sane F, Gharbi J, Aouni M, Romond MB, Hober D. Coxsackievirus B4 and type 1 diabetes pathogenesis: contribution of animal models. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. Oct 2009;25(7):591-603. [Medline].
Richer MJ, Horwitz MS. Coxsackievirus infection as an environmental factor in the etiology of type 1 diabetes. Autoimmun Rev. Jun 2009;8(7):611-5. [Medline].
Ooi MH, Solomon T, Podin Y, et al. Evaluation of different clinical sample types in diagnosis of human enterovirus 71-associated hand-foot-and-mouth disease. J Clin Microbiol. Jun 2007;45(6):1858-66. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Michos AG, Syriopoulou VP, Hadjichristodoulou C, et al. Aseptic meningitis in children: analysis of 506 cases. PLoS One. Aug 1 2007;2(7):e674. [Medline].
Piqueur et al. Improvement of a real-time RT-PCR asay for the detection of enterovirus RNA. Virology Journal. 2009;6:95.
Haneke E. Electron microscopic demonstration of virus particles in hand, foot and mouth disease. Dermatologica. 1985;171(5):321-6. [Medline].
Parra CA. Hand, foot and mouth disease. Light and electron microscopic observations. Arch Dermatol Forsch. 1972;245(2):147-53. [Medline].
Parra CA. Hand, foot and mouth disease. Light and electron microscopic observations. Arch Dermatol Forsch. 1972;245(2):147-53. [Medline].
Goodfellow IG, Evans DJ, Blom AM, et al. Inhibition of coxsackie B virus infection by soluble forms of its receptors: binding affinities, altered particle formation, and competition with cellular receptors. J Virol. Sep 2005;79(18):12016-24. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Werk D, Schubert S, Lindig V, et al. Developing an effective RNA interference strategy against a plus-strand RNA virus: silencing of coxsackievirus B3 and its cognate coxsackievirus-adenovirus receptor. Biol Chem. Sep 2005;386(9):857-63. [Medline].
Rotbart HA, Webster AD. Treatment of potentially life-threatening enterovirus infections with pleconaril. Clin Infect Dis. Jan 15 2001;32(2):228-35. [Medline].
Waldfahrer F, Iro H. Successful treatment of herpangina with allopurinol mouthwashes. Laryngoscope. Dec 1995;105(12 Pt 1):1405. [Medline].
Lee BE, Davies HD. Aseptic meningitis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. Jun 2007;20(3):272-7. [Medline].
Nathan M, Walsh R, Hardin JT, et al. Enteroviral sepsis and ischemic cardiomyopathy in a neonate: case report and review of literature. ASAIO J. Sep-Oct 2008;54(5):554-5. [Medline].
Ornoy A, Tenenbaum A. Pregnancy outcome following infections by coxsackie, echo, measles, mumps, hepatitis, polio and encephalitis viruses. Reprod Toxicol. May 2006;21(4):446-57. [Medline].
Evans AD, Waddington E. Hand, foot and mouth disease in south Wales, 1964. Br J Dermatol. Jun 1967;79(6):309-17. [Medline].
Haley JC, Hood AF. Hand-foot-and-mouth disease. In: Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. Vol 2. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1999:2403-7.
Pallansch MA. Acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis. In: Strickland GT, ed. Hunter's Tropical Medicine. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2000:226-7.
Pallansch MA, Roos RP. Enteroviruses: polioviruses, coxsackieviruses, echoviruses, and newer enteroviruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA, Roizman B, Straus SE, eds. Fields' Virology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:723-75.
Pindborg JJ. Atlas of Diseases of the Oral Mucosa. 4th ed. Copenhagen, Denmark: WB Saunders; 1985:36-8.
Raskin CA, Parrot RH. Herpangina. In: Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. Vol 2. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1999:2407-9.
Sterling JG, Kurtz JB. Viral infections. In: Rook/Wilkinson/Ebling Textbook of Dermatology. Vol 2. London, England: Blackwell Science; 1998:995-1096.

