Chronic Paroxysmal Hemicrania 

  • Author: Manish K Singh, MD; more...
 
Updated: Jan 30, 2012
 

Background

Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania (CPH), also known as Sjaastad syndrome, was first described in 1974, by Sjaastad and Dale.[1] In 1976, the term CPH was proposed by Sjaastad on the basis of the first 2 patients, who had daily (ie, chronic), solitary, limited attacks (ie, paroxysmal) of unilateral headache that did not shift sides (ie, hemicrania).[2] CPH, which has been included in the International Headache Society (IHS) classification system since 1988, is much less common than cluster headache (CH). (See Presentation.)

The short-lasting primary headache syndromes may be divided into (1) headaches with autonomic activation and (2) headaches without autonomic activation. Headaches with autonomic activation include chronic and episodic paroxysmal hemicrania, CH, and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT syndrome). (See Etiology and DDx.)

Diagnostic criteria

IHS diagnostic criteria for CPH include the following (slightly modified from the Headache Classification Committee criteria, 1988) (see Presentation, Workup, Treatment, and Medication)[3] :

  • At least 50 attacks fulfilling the criteria mentioned in the bullet points below
  • Attacks of severe, unilateral orbital, supraorbital, and/or temporal pain, always on the same side, lasting 2-45 minutes
  • Attack frequency of more than 5 per day for more than half of the time (periods with lower frequency may occur)
  • Pain associated with at least 1 of the following signs/symptoms on the symptomatic side: (1) conjunctival injection, (2) lacrimation, (3) nasal congestion, (4) rhinorrhea, (5) ptosis, and (6) eyelid edema
  • Absolute effectiveness of indomethacin (150mg daily or less)
  • At least 1 of the following: (1) history, physical, and neurologic examination findings do not suggest any of several disorders that include organic headaches, headaches associated with drug withdrawal, metabolic disorders, and other conditions; (2) history and/or physical and/or neurologic examination findings do suggest such a disorder, but it is ruled out by appropriate investigations; (3) such a disorder is present, but CPH does not occur for the first time in close relation to the disorder

Chronic versus nonchronic

CPH may be present in nonchronic or chronic form, although the chronic type is 4 times more common. Nonchronic attacks are similar to chronic ones but may be less severe and less frequent. (See Prognosis.)

Before the development of chronic symptoms, many patients (42%) pass through a nonchronic stage, with attacks separated by intervals of complete remission.

The term pre-CPH stage or prechronic was preferred initially on the basis of the assumption that all patients would develop chronic symptoms. However, approximately 20% of patients appear to remain in the nonchronic stage for long periods.

Dividing CPH into unremitting and remitting forms may be appropriate. The unremitting form is the chronic form, which either is unremitting from the onset or evolves from the remitting form

Next

Etiology

The mechanisms responsible for pain in CPH remain unknown. The past medical history in patients with CPH is usually unremarkable. A history of head or neck trauma is reported in about 20% of cases, but these findings are similar to those for CH or migraine.

Occasionally, attacks may be provoked mechanically by bending or rotating the head and by applying external pressure against the transverse processes of C4-C5, C2 root, or the greater occipital nerve.

No familial disposition is known for CPH; families of affected individuals do not have higher incidences of CH or migraine than does the general population.

Discussion of important features, such as intense, unilateral headache; autonomic abnormalities; and effectiveness of indomethacin, may help in understanding the pathogenesis.[4]

Trigeminal, sympathetic, and parasympathetic involvement

The release of trigeminal and parasympathetic neuropeptides during headache has been described.[5] Activation of the ipsilateral trigeminovascular system may explain sudden, unilateral headache and may lead to miosis, increased intraocular pressure (IOP), and other autonomic abnormalities.

Increased sweating and decreased salivation during attacks and the ability of an alpha-blocking agent or a stellate ganglion blockade to inhibit an increase in IOP suggest sympathetic involvement.

Increased tearing, nasal secretion, and miosis may be due to parasympathetic stimulation. Trigeminoparasympathetic activation during CPH attacks has been suggested; increases in the vasoactive intestinal peptide (ie, parasympathetic peptide) level have been reported. levels of calcitonin gene-related peptide also are reported to be high during CPH attacks.

Pain and pressure threshold, nociceptive flexion reflex, and blink and corneal reflexes have been studied in patients with CPH. The corneal reflex thresholds have been found to be decreased bilaterally during CPH attacks. Increases in corneal temperature on the symptomatic side also have been reported; this finding may be due to increased ocular blood flow.

The effectiveness of indomethacin in CPH may be due partly to reduction of intracranial blood flow (via a nonprostaglandin mechanism) and partly to the drug’s anti-inflammatory effects.

These findings may indicate a primary central mechanism and a secondary involvement of peripheral factors, affecting the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems.

Hypothalamic involvement

Studies have suggested a crucial role by the hypothalamus in CPH. Functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated activation of the hypothalamus in cases of trigeminal autonomic cephalgias.[6, 7]

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Occurrence in the United States

CPH is a rare syndrome, but the number of diagnosed cases is increasing. The prevalence of CPH is not known, but the relative frequency compared with CH is reported to be approximately 1-3%.

International occurrence

Many cases of CPH have been described throughout the world, in different races and in different countries, including Australia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Denmark, Italy, France, Mexico, Canada, Sweden, Germany, Poland, India, Spain, Brazil, South Africa, Norway, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Sex- and age-related demographics

In the past, because of a female preponderance, CPH was considered a disease of women. However, CPH has been reported in increasing numbers of men. A study conducted in 1979 reported a female-to-male ratio of 7:1, but a review of 84 patients in 1989 reported a female-to-male ratio of 2.3:1.

CPH can occur at any age, with the mean age of onset being 34 years.[8] Patients as young as age 6 years have been described in the literature, while the oldest known patient with CPH was age 81 years.[9, 10] In one report, CPH beginning at age 3 years was described; however, the condition may have been related to ipsilateral occipital hemorrhagic infarction in this patient.[11]

Previous
Next

Prognosis

Patients in the nonremitting stage of CPH may need lifelong therapy, possibly with smaller doses of indomethacin.

Long-lasting remission periods usually reflect a nonchronic stage, but they may occur in patients with established chronic disease. In chronic cases, in fact, recurrence of attacks after a drug-free period of 1.5 years has been reported.

The mortality rate and morbidities associated with CPH have not been reported, although the therapy of choice for this condition, indomethacin, is known to be associated with the risk of bleeding.

Factors that may or may not affect the course of CPH include the following:

  • Pregnancy - CPH attacks have been reported to improve during pregnancy; however, they recur after delivery
  • Menstruation - Menstruation may have either a positive or negative effect on attacks
  • Birth control - Birth control pills do not seem to influence attack frequency
  • Menopause - Reliable data do not exist regarding the effects of menopause on CPH
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Manish K Singh, MD  Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, Teaching Faculty for Pain Management and Neurology Residency Program, Hahnemann University Hospital, Drexel College of Medicine; Medical Director, Neurology and Pain Management, Jersey Institute of Neuroscience

Manish K Singh, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Pain Medicine, American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin, American Headache Society, American Medical Association, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Jashvant Patel, MD  Medical Director, Department of Pain Medicine and Comprehensive Rehabilitation, Medical College of Pennsylvania Hahnemann University

Jashvant Patel, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alberta Medical Association, American Academy of Pain Medicine, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Medical Association, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and Medical Society of the State of New York

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Howard A Crystal, MD Professor, Departments of Neurology and Pathology, State University of New York Downstate; Consulting Staff, Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Kings County Hospital Center

Howard A Crystal, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology and American Neurological Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jorge E Mendizabal, MD Consulting Staff, Corpus Christi Neurology

Jorge E Mendizabal, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Headache Society, National Stroke Association, and Stroke Council of the American Heart Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

References
  1. Sjaastad O, Dale I. Evidence for a new (?), treatable headache entity. Headache. Jul 1974;14(2):105-8. [Medline].

  2. Sjaastad O, Dale I. A new (?) Clinical headache entity "chronic paroxysmal hemicrania" 2. Acta Neurol Scand. Aug 1976;54(2):140-59. [Medline].

  3. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia. 1988;8 Suppl 7:1-96. [Medline].

  4. Russell D, Vincent M. Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania. In: The Headaches. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:741-9.

  5. Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB. A review of paroxysmal hemicranias, SUNCT syndrome and other short-lasting headaches with autonomic feature, including new cases. Brain. Jan 1997;120 ( Pt 1):193-209. [Medline].

  6. Matharu M, May A. Functional and structural neuroimaging in trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. Curr Pain Headache Rep. Apr 2008;12(2):132-7. [Medline].

  7. Leone M, Bussone G. Pathophysiology of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. Lancet Neurol. Aug 2009;8(8):755-64. [Medline].

  8. Sjaastad O, Apfelbaum R, Caskey W, Christoffersen B, Diamond S, Graham J, et al. Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania (CPH). The clinical manifestations. A review. Ups J Med Sci Suppl. 1980;31:27-33. [Medline].

  9. Kudrow DB, Kudrow L. Successful aspirin prophylaxis in a child with chronic paroxysmal hemicrania. Headache. May 1989;29(5):280-1. [Medline].

  10. Gladstein J, Holden EW, Peralta L. Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania in a child. Headache. Oct 1994;34(9):519-20. [Medline].

  11. Broeske D, Lenn NJ, Cantos E. Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania in a young child: possible relation to ipsilateral occipital infarction. J Child Neurol. Jul 1993;8(3):235-6. [Medline].

  12. Seidel S, Lieba-Samal D, Vigl M, Wöber C. Clinical features of unilateral headaches beyond migraine and cluster headache and their response to indomethacin. Wien Klin Wochenschr. Sep 2011;123(17-18):536-41. [Medline].

  13. Evers S, Bauer B, Suhr B, Voss H, Frese A, Husstedt IW. Cognitive processing is involved in cluster headache but not in chronic paroxysmal hemicrania. Neurology. Jul 22 1999;53(2):357-63. [Medline].

  14. Shabbir N, McAbee G. Adolescent chronic paroxysmal hemicrania responsive to verapamil monotherapy. Headache. Apr 1994;34(4):209-10. [Medline].

  15. Dahlöf C. Subcutaneous sumatriptan does not abort attacks of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania (CPH). Headache. Apr 1993;33(4):201-2. [Medline].

  16. Hannerz J, Jogestrand T. Intracranial hypertension and sumatriptan efficacy in a case of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania which became bilateral. (The mechanism of indomethacin in CPH). Headache. Jun 1993;33(6):320-3. [Medline].

  17. Pascual J, Quijano J. A case of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania responding to subcutaneous sumatriptan. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Sep 1998;65(3):407. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.