Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylosis Workup
- Author: Sandeep S Rana, MD; Chief Editor: Tarakad S Ramachandran, MBBS, MBA, MPH, FAAN, FACP, FAHA, FRCP, FRCPC, FRS, LRCP, MRCP, MRCS more...
Cyanocobalamin (vitamin B-12) levels and a serum rapid plasma reagin may help distinguish metabolic and infectious causes of myelopathy from cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Metabolic and infectious conditions may coexist with cervical spondylosis, and, thus, an abnormal laboratory profile does not exclude cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Although plain films of the cervical spine are the least costly and most widely available imaging modality, the imaging study of choice is MRI.
Although a narrow spinal canal with a sagittal diameter of 10-13 mm (as visualized on a plain radiograph) has been associated with a higher incidence of neurologic deficit and cervical spondylotic myelopathy, this measurement has become less important with the widespread availability of MRI. MRI allows direct visualization of neural structures and allows a more accurate estimation of the cord space.
Plain radiography can help assess the contribution of spinal alignment and degenerative spondylolisthesis to canal stenosis.
MRI is a noninvasive and radiation-free procedure that provides excellent imaging of the spinal cord and subarachnoid space and is a sensitive method for determining involvement of these by extradural pathology. MRI allows multiplanar imaging, excellent imaging of the neural elements, and increased accuracy in diagnosing intrinsic cord disease. It may detect pathology in the asymptomatic patient, or the pathology may be unrelated to the symptoms. In one report, 57% of patients who were older than 64 years had disk bulging and 26% of patients in this age group had evidence of cord compression on MRIs. Some spondylotic changes (eg, small lateral osteophytes, midbody calcific densities) may be overlooked by MRI.
Overall, the advantages of MRI significantly outweigh its deficiencies, and thus it has become the standard diagnostic study for spondylotic disease. It has been demonstrated to be an accurate imaging modality in several studies. When surgical results were used as the criterion standard, agreement with MRI findings was found in 74% of cases, agreement with CT myelography in 84% of cases, and with myelography in 67% of cases. In one study, MRI was demonstrated to be 90% sensitive for the diagnosis of cervical stenosis, while CT myelography and CT scanning were 100% sensitive.
Plain films of the cervical spine are an inexpensive way of assessing spondylotic disease in symptomatic patients. Cervical spine films can demonstrate disk-space narrowing, osteophytosis, loss of cervical lordosis, uncovertebral joint hypertrophy, apophyseal joint osteoarthritis, and vertebral canal diameter. The nearly universal presence of spondylotic radiographic changes in elderly patients (and the similar appearance of a cervical spine film in a symptomatic patient and an asymptomatic patient) allows the classification of an individual patient as having mild, moderate, or severe spondylotic changes.
CT scanning is another important imaging modality. Superior to MRI in its definition of bony anatomy, CT scanning better defines the neural foramina. CT scanning is often used to complement MRI and to provide additional bony detail to characterize a lesion responsible for neural encroachment.
Myelography is also useful for demonstrating nerve root lesions. Myelography demonstrates nerve root take off very well. It is particularly useful in patients under going reoperation.
Some authors, however, report that CT myelography has a lower rate of false-positive results compared with conventional myelography. Some researchers have concluded that CT myelography provides additional data only when myelography results are positive—negative myelography findings followed by CT scanning in the case of suspected spondylosis is unlikely to show any clinically useful findings.
Recently, dynamic CT myelography has been reported as useful in the surgical planning for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, in some cases altering the surgeon's approach on the basis of dynamic findings. Nevertheless, the exact role for dynamic imaging such as dynamic CT myelography and dynamic MRI remains to be determined.
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), a developed magnetic resonance technique, can aid in detecting intramedullary lesions. One study found that when DTI is performed along 6 noncollinear directions with single-shot spin echoplanar imaging (EPI) sequence, it clearly revealed the intramedullary microstructure and more lesions than conventional MRI.
Electrodiagnostic studies are useful in many patients.
Electromyography (EMG) can help diagnose cervical radiculopathy and, occasionally, identify cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
EMG is useful in the study of radiculopathy because it demonstrates a close correlation with neuroimaging and operative findings.
It also provides an anatomic distribution of abnormalities, thus facilitating the differential of cervical radiculopathy from other similar causes of radicular symptoms.
EMG can help determine how long a lesion has been present. When using modern imaging techniques such as MRI, EMG can help clarify whether a lesion observed on imaging is the cause of nerve root pathology.
In a patient with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, EMG can exclude specific syndromes of peripheral neuropathy rather than confirm cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Somatosensory evoked potentials and cortical motor evoked potentials also may help evaluate spinal cord dysfunction, especially in timing intervention for the asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patient with early cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Histologic findings associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy are greatest at the site of maximal compression. Changes in the gray matter range from consistent motor-neuron loss and ischemic changes in surviving neurons to necrosis and cavitation. Frequently, involvement of white matter is minimal, although it varies in degree. White matter changes, when they occur, are generally seen in the ventral inner portion of the dorsal column or in the lateral columns bordering the gray matter, with the anterior columns being only slightly damaged. Nongliotic necrosis is frequently described. Wallerian degeneration of posterior columns cephalad to the site of compression and of corticospinal tracts caudal to site of compression is frequent. Widespread proliferation of small, thickened, and hyalinized intermedullary blood vessels is frequently reported.
Many of these findings are similar to a pathological model of vascular occlusion. Extensive infarction of gray and white matter is associated with anteroposterior compression ratios of less than 20%.[11, 7] Based on a cadaveric study, the critical degree of anteroposterior compression necessary to induce histopathologic changes in the spinal cord has been suggested to be 30%.
Parke WW. Correlative anatomy of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Jul. 13(7):831-7. [Medline].
McCormack BM, Weinstein PR. Cervical spondylosis. An update. West J Med. 1996 Jul-Aug. 165(1-2):43-51. [Medline].
Wilkinson M. The morbid anatomy of cervical spondylosis and myelopathy. Brain. 1960 Dec. 83:589-617. [Medline].
Hoff JT, Wilson CB. The pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy. Clin Neurosurg. 1977. 24:474-87. [Medline].
Rosomoff HL, Fishbain D, Rosomoff RS. Chronic cervical pain: radiculopathy or brachialgia. Noninterventional treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Oct. 17(10 Suppl):S362-6. [Medline].
Emery SE. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001 Nov-Dec. 9(6):376-88. [Medline].
Fehlings MG, Skaf G. A review of the pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with insights for potential novel mechanisms drawn from traumatic spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Dec 15. 23(24):2730-7. [Medline].
Young WF. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in older persons. Am Fam Physician. 2000 Sep 1. 62(5):1064-70, 1073. [Medline].
McCormick WE, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: make the difficult diagnosis, then refer for surgery. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003 Oct. 70(10):899-904. [Medline].
Young WF, Weaver M, Mishra B. Surgical outcome in patients with coexisting multiple sclerosis and spondylosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999 Aug. 100(2):84-7. [Medline].
al-Mefty O, Harkey HL, Marawi I, et al. Experimental chronic compressive cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1993 Oct. 79(4):550-61. [Medline].
Henderson FC, Geddes JF, Vaccaro AR, Woodard E, Berry KJ, Benzel EC. Stretch-associated injury in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: new concept and review. Neurosurgery. 2005 May. 56(5):1101-13; discussion 1101-13. [Medline].
Moore AP, Blumhardt LD. A prospective survey of the causes of non-traumatic spastic paraparesis and tetraparesis in 585 patients. Spinal Cord. 1997 Jun. 35(6):361-7. [Medline].
Holt S, Yates PO. Cervical spondylosis and nerve root lesions. Incidence at routine necropsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966 Aug. 48(3):407-23. [Medline].
Rahim KA, Stambough JL. Radiographic evaluation of the degenerative cervical spine. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jul. 23(3):395-403. [Medline].
Heller JG. The syndromes of degenerative cervical disease. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jul. 23(3):381-94. [Medline].
Ellenberg MR, Honet JC, Treanor WJ. Cervical radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Mar. 75(3):342-52. [Medline].
Stoffman MR, Roberts MS, King JT Jr. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy, depression, and anxiety: a cohort analysis of 89 patients. Neurosurgery. 2005 Aug. 57(2):307-13; discussion 307-13. [Medline].
Schneider RC, Cherry G, Pantek H. The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury; with special reference to the mechanisms involved in hyperextension injuries of cervical spine. J Neurosurg. 1954 Nov. 11(6):546-77. [Medline].
Kaye JJ, Dunn AW. Cervical spondylotic dysphagia. South Med J. 1977 May. 70(5):613-4. [Medline].
Umerah BC, Mukherjee BK, Ibekwe O. Cervical spondylosis and dysphagia. J Laryngol Otol. 1981 Nov. 95(11):1179-83. [Medline].
Sobol SM, Rigual NR. Anterolateral extrapharyngeal approach for cervical osteophyte-induced dysphagia. Literature review. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1984 Sep-Oct. 93(5 Pt 1):498-504. [Medline].
Farooqi NA, Doran M, Buxton N. Cervical osteophytes: a cause of potentially life-threatening laryngeal spasms. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 May. 4(5):419-20. [Medline].
Kanbay M, Selcuk H, Yilmaz U. Dysphagia caused by cervical osteophytes: a rare case. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jul. 54(7):1147-8. [Medline].
Teresi LM, Lufkin RB, Reicher MA, et al. Asymptomatic degenerative disk disease and spondylosis of the cervical spine: MR imaging. Radiology. 1987 Jul. 164(1):83-8. [Medline].
Brown BM, Schwartz RH, Frank E, Blank NK. Preoperative evaluation of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy by surface-coil MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Dec. 151(6):1205-12. [Medline].
Alexander JT. Natural history and nonoperative management of cervical spondylosis. In: Menezes AH, Sonntag VKH, et al. Principles of Spinal Surgery. Vol 1. 1996:547-557.
Penning L, Wilmink JT, van Woerden HH, Knol E. CT myelographic findings in degenerative disorders of the cervical spine: clinical significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Apr. 146(4):793-801. [Medline].
Yamazaki T, Suzuki K, Yanaka K, Matsumura A. Dynamic computed tomography myelography for the investigation of cervical degenerative disease. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2006 Apr. 46(4):210-5; discussion 215-6. [Medline].
Song T, Chen WJ, Yang B, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord. Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar. 20(3):422-8. [Medline].
Iwabuchi M, Kikuchi S, Sato K. Pathoanatomic investigation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2004 Dec. 50(2):47-54. [Medline].
Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM, Murray MP. Neck pain: a long-term follow-up of 205 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Jan-Feb. 12(1):1-5. [Medline].
AGS Panel on Persistent Pain in Older Persons. The management of of persistent pain in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002. 50(Suppl 6):S205-S224.
Swezey RL, Swezey AM, Warner K. Efficacy of home cervical traction therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Jan-Feb. 78(1):30-2. [Medline].
Kaiser MG, Haid RW, Subach BR, Barnes B, Rodts GE Jr. Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery. Feb-2002. 50:229-236.
Baskin DS, Ryan P, Sonnta V, Westmark R, Wedmayer MA. A prospective, randomized, controlled cervical fusion study using recombinant human bone morphogentic protein-2 with the CORNERSTONE-SR allograft ring and the ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. Spine. 2003. 28:1219-1225.
Rowland LP. Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: time for a controlled trial. Neurology. 1992 Jan. 42(1):5-13. [Medline].
Nurick S. The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972. 95(1):101-8. [Medline].
Fouyas IP, Statham PF, Sandercock PA. Cochrane review on the role of surgery in cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Apr 1. 27(7):736-47. [Medline].
Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednaník J, et al. Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Oct 15. 27(20):2205-10; discussion 2210-1. [Medline].
Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis JD, Ducker TB. Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy. A prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Mar 15. 25(6):670-6. [Medline].
Ma X, Zhao XF, Zhao YB. [A clinical study on different decompression methods in cervical spondylosis]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Apr 15. 47(8):607-9. [Medline].
Lee JY, Sharan A, Baron EM, et al. Quantitative prediction of spinal cord drift after cervical laminectomy and arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jul 15. 31(16):1795-8. [Medline].
Wang MY, Shah S, Green BA. Clinical outcomes following cervical laminoplasty for 204 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol. 2004 Dec. 62(6):487-92; discussion 492-3. [Medline].
Kaminsky SB, Clark CR, Traynelis VC. Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. A comparison of laminectomy and laminoplasty at five year average follow-up. Iowa Orthop J. 2004. 24:95-105. [Medline].
Grob D. Surgery in the degenerative cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Dec 15. 23(24):2674-83. [Medline].
Kumar VG, Rea GL, Mervis LJ, McGregor JM. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: functional and radiographic long-term outcome after laminectomy and posterior fusion. Neurosurgery. 1999 Apr. 44(4):771-7; discussion 777-8. [Medline].
Houten JK, Cooper PR. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery. 2003 May. 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. [Medline].
Huang RC, Girardi FP, Poynton AR, Cammisa Jr FP. Treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy with posterior decompression and fusion with lateral mass plate fixation and local bone graft. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Apr. 16(2):123-9. [Medline].
Chagas H, Domingues F, Aversa A, Vidal Fonseca AL, de Souza JM. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion. Surg Neurol. 2005. 64 Suppl 1:S1:30-5; discussion S1:35-6. [Medline].
Chibbaro S, Benvenuti L, Carnesecchi S, et al. Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: experience and surgical results in a series of 70 consecutive patients. J Clin Neurosci. 2006 Feb. 13(2):233-8. [Medline].
Macdonald RL, Fehlings MG, Tator CH, et al. Multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy and fibular allograft fusion for cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jun. 86(6):990-7. [Medline].
Santiago P, Fessler RG. Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Management of cervical spondylosis. Neurosurgery. Jan-2007. 60:S1-160-165.
Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, et al. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 15. 34(2):101-7. [Medline].
Razack N, Greenberg J, Green BA. Surgery for cervical myelopathy in geriatric patients. Spinal Cord. 1998 Sep. 36(9):629-32. [Medline].
Murphey F, Simmons JC, Brunson B. Chapter 2. Ruptured cervical discs, 1939 to 1972. Clin Neurosurg. 1973. 20:9-17. [Medline].
Whitecloud TS 3rd, Seago RA. Cervical discogenic syndrome. Results of operative intervention in patients with positive discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 May. 12(4):313-6. [Medline].
Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF Jr, et al. Methylprednisolone or naloxone treatment after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow-up data. Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. J Neurosurg. 1992 Jan. 76(1):23-31. [Medline].
Chesnut RM, Abitbol JJ, Garfin SR. Surgical management of cervical radiculopathy. Indication, techniques, and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jul. 23(3):461-74. [Medline].
Chiles BW 3rd, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, Cooper PR. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery. 1999 Apr. 44(4):762-9; discussion 769-70. [Medline].
Clarke E, Robinson PK. Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1956 Sep. 79(3):483-510. [Medline].
Clements DH, O'Leary PF. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Oct. 15(10):1023-5. [Medline].
Connor PM, Darden BV 2nd. Cervical discography complications and clinical efficacy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Oct 15. 18(14):2035-8. [Medline].
Cull R, Whittle I. The nervous system. Munro J, Edwards CS. Macleod's Clinical Examination. 1995. 201-256.
Denno JJ, Meadows GR. Early diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A useful clinical sign. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Dec. 16(12):1353-5. [Medline].
Dillin W, Booth R, Cuckler J, Balderston R, Simeone F, Rothman R. Cervical radiculopathy. A review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Dec. 11(10):988-91. [Medline].
Dillin W, Uppal GS. Analysis of medications used in the treatment of cervical disk degeneration. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jul. 23(3):421-33. [Medline].
Durufle A, Petrilli S, Le Guiet JL, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy in athetoid cerebral palsy patients: about five cases. Joint Bone Spine. 2005 May. 72(3):270-4. [Medline].
Ebara S, Yonenobu K, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K, Ono K. Myelopathy hand characterized by muscle wasting. A different type of myelopathy hand in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Jul. 13(7):785-91. [Medline].
Firooznia H, Ahn JH, Rafii M, Ragnarsson KT. Sudden quadriplegia after a minor trauma. The role of preexisting spinal stenosis. Surg Neurol. 1985 Feb. 23(2):165-8. [Medline].
Goodridge AE, Feasby TE, Ebers GC, Brown WF, Rice GP. Hand wasting due to mid-cervical spinal cord compression. Can J Neurol Sci. 1987 Aug. 14(3):309-11. [Medline].
Haerer AF. Examination in cases of suspected hysteria and malingering. DeJong's The Neurologic Examination. 5th ed. 1992. 744.
Haldeman S, Kohlbeck FJ, McGregor M. Risk factors and precipitating neck movements causing vertebrobasilar artery dissection after cervical trauma and spinal manipulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Apr 15. 24(8):785-94. [Medline].
Irvine DH, Foster JB, Newell DJ, Klukvin BN. Prevalence of cervical spondylosis in a general practice. Lancet. 1965 May 22. 14:1089-92. [Medline].
Jumah KB, Nyame PK. Relationship between load carrying on the head and cervical spondylosis in Ghanaians. West Afr J Med. 1994 Jul-Sep. 13(3):181-2. [Medline].
Kaiser JA, Holland BA. Imaging of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Dec 15. 23(24):2701-12. [Medline].
LaBan MM, Taylor RS. Manipulation: an objective analysis of the literature. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jul. 23(3):451-9. [Medline].
Lam M. Headache. Adler SN, et al. A Pocket manual of Differential Diagnosis. 1994. 303-304.
LaRocca H. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: natural history. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Jul. 13(7):854-5. [Medline].
Lees F, Turner J. Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. BMJ. 1963. 2:1603.
Nakano KK. Neck pain. Kelley WN, Harris ED, Ruddy S, Sledge CB. Textbook of Rheumatology. 1985. 471-490.
Ono K, Ebara S, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K. Myelopathy hand. New clinical signs of cervical cord damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987 Mar. 69(2):215-9. [Medline].
Papadopoulos SM, Hoff JT. Anatomical treatment of cervical spondylosis. Clin Neurosurg. 1994. 41:270-85. [Medline].
Raynor RB, Pugh J, Shapiro I. Cervical facetectomy and its effect on spine strength. J Neurosurg. 1985 Aug. 63(2):278-82. [Medline].
Robinson R, Smith G. Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1955. 96:223.
Saunders R. Corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Menezes AH, Sonntag VH, et al. Principles of Spinal Surgery. 1996. Vol. 1: 559-569.
Schellhas KP, Smith MD, Gundry CR, Pollei SR. Cervical discogenic pain. Prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Feb 1. 21(3):300-11; discussion 311-2. [Medline].
Tan JC, Nordin M. Role of physical therapy in the treatment of cervical disk disease. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jul. 23(3):435-49. [Medline].
Verbiest H. Chapter 23. The management of cervical spondylosis. Clin Neurosurg. 1973. 20:262-94. [Medline].
Viikari-Juntura E, Porras M, Laasonen EM. Validity of clinical tests in the diagnosis of root compression in cervical disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Mar. 14(3):253-7. [Medline].
Watson JC, Broaddus WC, Smith MM, Kubal WS. Hyperactive pectoralis reflex as an indicator of upper cervical spinal cord compression. Report of 15 cases. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jan. 86(1):159-61. [Medline].
Yoo K, Origitano TC. Familial cervical spondylosis. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1998 Jul. 89(1):139-41. [Medline].
Yoss RE, Corbin KB, Maccarty CS, Love JG. Significance of symptoms and signs in localization of involved root in cervical disk protrusion. Neurology. 1957 Oct. 7(10):673-83. [Medline].