eMedicine Specialties > Neurology > Headache and Pain
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
Updated: Dec 17, 2009
Introduction
Background
In 1994, a consensus group of pain medicine experts gathered by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) agreed on diagnostic criteria for reflex sympathetic dystrophy and causalgia, and renamed them complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II respectively. These groups were determined according to the type of inciting event, rather than any difference in clinical presentation or pathophysiology. Many experts felt that the IASP diagnostic criteria were ambiguous; however, these criteria were developed as a starting point, and the IASP fully intended to validate these criteria through clinical research studies.1,2
CRPS type I requirements included causation by an initiating noxious event, such as a crush or soft tissue injury; or causation by immobilization, such as due to a tight cast or frozen shoulder. CRPS type II is characterized by the presence of a defined nerve injury. Both types demonstrate continuing pain, allodynia, or hyperalgesia that is usually disproportionate to the inciting event. At some time during the process, both show evidence of edema; changes in skin blood flow as manifested by color change and skin temperature changes greater than 1.1°C from the homologous body part; or abnormal sudomotor activity in the painful region. Both types require exclusion of the existence of any condition that might otherwise account for the degree of pain and dysfunction.1,3
Since their inception, experts and pain medicine specialists have communicated their concerns regarding the clinical and scientific value of the IASP criteria claiming that they exhibit poor diagnostic specificity and may result in overdiagnosis of CRPS. A small single center empirical validation study demonstrated that the 1994 CRPS criteria did indeed demonstrate overdiagnosis of the syndrome.3 Other studies have confirmed the lack of any uniform consensus and thorough validation of IASP criteria has not yet been achieved.
Pathophysiology
Hypothetical mechanisms
In most cases, experts believe that the development of CRPS results when persistent noxious stimuli from an injured body region leads to peripheral and central sensitization; whereby, primary afferent nociceptive mechanisms demonstrate abnormally heightened sensitization, including spontaneous pain and hyperalgesia. Allodynia and hyperalgesia occur when central nervous system (CNS) somatosensory processing of normal nonpainful mechanical stimuli, such as light touching of the skin, are perceived as painful. Therefore, skin in the injured area becomes more sensitive to all stimuli, even nonpainful stimuli. Sensory impairment and hyperalgesia evolve through sensitization and altered central processing such that aberrant perception of pain spreads beyond the original injury site and beyond the area of spontaneous pain.
A similar impairment of CNS processing leads to motor aberrancies, such as weakness in the affected area or tremor. Sensitization peripherally and centrally within the nervous system associated with impaired CNS processing is linked to proposed disturbances within the sympathetic nervous system that lead to the appearance of sympathetic hyperactivity that adversely affects the injured area. Studies suggest that an augmented inflammatory response coupled with impaired healing further contribute to the refractory nature of the malevolent CRPS.4,2,5,6,7
Peripheral and central sensitization
Mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli activate peripheral nociceptors that transmit pain messages through lightly myelinated A-delta fibers and unmyelinated C fibers. Algogenic substances that are typically involved in tissue damage and capable of inducing transduction centripetally include potassium, serotonin, bradykinin, histamine, prostaglandins, leukotrienes and substance P (SP). Neuropeptides, such as SP and CGRP, are transported to the endings of nociceptive afferents where they can instigate ortho- and retrograde actions, including, but not limited to, neurogenic inflammation, which can incite a host of additional hostile algogenic mechanisms.
Pain messaging is transmitted through C fibers and A-delta fibers that project to Rexed layers I, II, and V in the spinal cord. Peripheral sensitization occurs when persisitant or repetitive noxious stimulation of high threshold polymodal C fibers causes enhanced sensitivity, lower stimulus thresholds, and prolonged enhanced activation of dorsal horncells, especially those with glutamate receptors. Peripheral transmission of pain stimuli through A-delta fibers and C fibers leads to the release of excitatory amino acids, such as glutamine and asparagine, which then act upon N -methyl-D -aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors, causing release of the neuropeptide SP. NMDA-activated release of substance P lowers the threshold for synaptic excitability in these normally silent second order interspinal synapses.4,2,5,6,7
CNS sensitization and chronicity are fostered through afferent processing by second-order nociceptive-specific neurons and wide-dynamic-range (WDR) neurons in the spinal cord. WDR neurons contribute more significant sensitivity than nociceptor-specific neurons, because both nociceptive and non-nociceptive afferents converge to synapse on a single WDR neuron, and WDR neurons respond with equal intensity regardless of whether the neural signal is noxious (hyperalgesia).
Hyperalgesia and allodynia initially develop at the injury site; however, when central sensitization occurs through WDR neural activity, the area of pain expands beyond the initial region of tissue pathology. The peripheral changes described eventually cause an injury environment, whereby primary afferents, including nociceptors, demonstrate an increased sensitivity to circulating or experimentally injected subcutaneous norepinephrine.8,2,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,14
Sympathetically maintained pain (SMP)
For decades, CRPS was thought to be caused by sympathetic nervous system (SNS) hyperactivity. SNS involvement in CRPS is supported clinically by the presence of abnormal temperature and color of the skin and altered sweating in the affected extremities. Surgical and chemical sympathectomy can relieve pain in some cases. However, under normal physiologic circumstances, there is no interaction between sympathetic and peripheral afferent nociceptive neurons.8,2,15,16,17 Furthermore, multiple discrepancies contradict an SNS role. Some of these discrepancies include the following: (1) plasma catecholamine concentrations are lower in CRPS-affected limbs18,19 , (2) most patients diagnosed with CRPS do not obtain significant or durable pain relief from sympathetic blocks20,21 , and (3) skin temperature does not correlate with the activity of sympathetic vasoconstrictor neurons.22
To explain this incongruity, the pathophysiology of SMP was hypothesized to result from an abnormal coupling between sympathetic efferent and nociceptive afferent neurons.23 Two possible conditions may lead to pathological coupling: interaction of between sympathetic efferents and intact or regenerating peripheral nociceptive C-fiber neurons or interaction with sympathetic vasoconstrictor neurons and afferent somata within the dorsal root ganglion (DRG).24
This coupling is mediated by norepinephrine, which is released from sympathetic terminals and adrenoreceptors that are newly expressed on afferent nociceptive neurons. Thus, increased mRNA for alpha-2-adrenoreceptors has been demonstrated in DRG neurons following a nerve injury.25 Therefore, an increased number of targeted and functionally upregulated alpha-receptors on lesioned nociceptive afferents, which has been demonstrated, would explain how reduced sympathetic activity in CRPS is capable of maintaining pain.16,2
Evidence suggests that early autonomic symptoms and signs of CRPS are indicative of CNS dysfunction.26 Wasner et al suggest that warmth of the affected extremity in the early stages of CRPS I is caused by functional inhibition of central cutaneous vasoconstrictor activity that leads to cutaneous vasodilation.17 However, over time, functional inhibition of vasoconstrictor activity may lead to adrenergic hypersensitivity from peripheral denervation and/or sympathetic denervation.
Initially, vasodilatation is present in the denervated area, but later, the vasculature may develop increased sensitivity to circulating catecholamines due to upregulation of cutaneous adrenoreceptors. In fact, research has revealed that the nerve lesion in CRPS II leads to an increased sensitivity to circulating catecholamines. Initially, vasodilation is present within the denervated area causing the skin adjacent and on the same side to become abnormally warm at first and then change to a chronically cold status. This occurrence mimics the course of chronic or progressive CRPS due to vasoconstriction caused by vascular hypersensitivity to catecholamines. Other mechanisms include an increased density of cutaneous alpha-adrenoreceptors and pathological upregulation of alpha-adrenergic receptors.8,2,21,15,23,24,25,26,17
Sensory and motor dysfunction
In both types of CRPS, peripheral and central sensitization explain the pathophysiology of spontaneous pain and hyperalgesia.27 Clinical findings in patients consistently show sensory impairments that spread beyond the injured territory and spontaneous pain, often engulfing a quadrant or hemisensory region. These abnormal patterns are due to altered central afferent processing and have been demonstrated on functional imaging studies.28,29,30
Likewise, evidence to date supports the presence of similar mechanisms involving abnormalities of CNS motor processing that are responsible for causing impairments of muscle strength affecting the involved distal extremity, rather than pain, edema, disuse, trophic changes, or nerve injury. Kinematic analysis studies suggest that motor deficits are probably due to impaired integration of visual and sensory afferent input within the parietal cortex.31 Also, increased amplitude of physiologic tremor due to CNS mechanisms is common, occurring in about 50% of patients under observation.32
Aberrant healing and exaggerated inflammation
After tissue injury, the body is programmed to respond in a manner that would promote healing toward regaining full use of the injured body part. Some experts have hypothesized that CRPS is caused by an aberrant healing response including exaggerated and persistent inflammation and guarding.
At the site of injury, peripheral C-fiber nociceptors transmit pain messages that cause ortho- and retrograde release of substance P and CGRP into damaged tissues, which result in vasodilation, extravasation of pro-nociceptive mediators, reactivation and further sensitization of C-fiber afferents, and increased tissue comorbidity in the injured area.8,5 These neuropeptides lead to the physical findings associated with inflammation, including redness, warmth, and swelling, which are also commonly present in early CRPS. Also, algogenic substances are released, which increases nociception and initiates the process of peripheral sensitization previously discussed. Skin sensitivity and tenderness spreads into adjacent regions, which are thought to be caused by secondary hyperalgesia from CNS alterations that are consistent with the described sensitization process.
Protective disuse
Decreased use of an injured body part would appear to be a normal postinjury reaction. After injury, the organism protects and guards the injured body part to optimize healing and prevent reinjury. The normal healing organism gradually increases the use of the injured region, which aids in the potential for recovery and reintegration of the body part into the organism’s normal sense of self. However, excessive protection and guarding, such as casting or splinting, is commonly promoted by medical recommendations and increases the patient’s volitional disuse of the extremity and promotes fear-avoidance, which may progress into a neurologic neglectlike syndrome.
This phenomenon has been postulated as causative in some patients with CRPS.32 Many of the symptoms and signs of CRPS are consistent with those that would naturally develop from lack of use. For example, an unused dependent limb eventually develops swelling (dependent edema), coolness (decreased blood flow), and trophic changes (decreased blood flow).8,2,33
Frequency
United States
A population-based study by Sandroni et al showed an incidence of approximately 5.5 per 100,000 person-years at risk and a prevalence of about 21 per 100,000 for CRPS type I.34 The same study showed an incidence of 0.8 per 100,000 person-years at risk and a prevalence of about 4 per 100,000 for CRPS type II.34,8 Therefore, the incidence of CRPS type I is higher than CRPS type II.34,8 The reported incidence of CRPS type I is 1-2% after various fractures8 , while the incidence of CRPS type II approximates 1-5% after peripheral nerve injury.8,35 The incidence of CRPS is 12% after a brain injury36 and 5% after myocardial infarction.37
Mortality/Morbidity
Despite treatment, many patients are left with varying degrees of chronic pain, trophic changes, and disability. Pain is the most important factor leading to disability. Some have suggested that aggressive treatment of pain in an acute setting could reduce the incidence of CRPS type I, however, further studies are needed to support this observation. Remissions followed by relapse have also been described. The frequency of the HLA-DQ1 antigen appears to be higher in patients with CRPS than in controls, and HLA-DR13 is associated with progression towards multifocal or generalized dystonia.38,39 Recently a new HLA I locus was detected that may predict spontaneous onset of CRPS.40
Race
CRPS affects all races; no racial predilection is observed.
Sex
Females experience CRPS more commonly than males by a ratio that varies from 2:1-4:1.8,41,34,42,43,44,45
Age
CRPS is distributed across age groups, with a mean age peek between 37 and 50 years.8,41,34,42,43,44,45 CRPS occurs in children with increased incidence following puberty, with females affected more frequently at a ratio of 4:1 and increased occurrence in the lower extremity by a ratio of 5.3:1. The mean age of onset is 12.5 years in a cohort of 396 children.
The highest incidence of the disease appears to be in adults aged 40-49 years; it appears frequently in almost every age group except children. CRPS type 1 has been described in children, but the incidence is much lower than in adults.
Clinical
History
Often symptoms of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1 begin immediately, days or weeks after an injury, usually in a distal extremity. Rarely, the onset can be months after the injury. Usually one limb is involved, but rarely the involvement can be bilateral (4-5%), and very rarely 3 or 4 extremities can be affected. CRPS type 1 can be acute (first 2 months) or chronic (after 2 months). Approximately half of patients with CRPS type 1 report it to be related to an on-the-job injury.
- Clinical features of CRPS type 1 are influenced by the following:
- Duration: As many as 80% of patients with initial symptoms of CRPS type 1 are cured within 18 months from onset, spontaneously or with treatment. Greater duration of CRPS is related to significantly greater likelihood of abnormalities of sensation and less likelihood of sweating abnormalities or edema.
- Location: The pain and other symptoms can be located virtually located anywhere in the body. Extremities are involved most often, although locations such as external genitalia or nose may be involved. Patients may have pain at the ulnar styloid process after Colles fracture or at the lateral malleolus after a sprain. Frozen shoulder and/or tendinitis of biceps often accompany CRPS type 1 in the hand.
- Symptoms of CRPS type 1 include the following:
- Spontaneous pain: Pain that is not limited to the territory of a single peripheral nerve is the cardinal feature of CRPS. The character of pain can be burning (most often), aching, throbbing, or tingling. The pain is aggravated by activity of the extremity, and its severity is typically disproportionate to the inciting event.
- Difficulty/inability in using the affected extremity
- Neglect-like symptoms: These include "cognitive neglect" in which the limb may feel foreign and "motor neglect" in which directed mental and visual attention are needed to move the limb.
- Altered skin temperature: This often is noted as a difference in skin temperature between the affected and unaffected limbs. At onset, the affected extremity is warmer in two thirds of cases and colder in one third. Many patients give a history of warmer extremities at onset and colder extremities later in the evolution of the disease. Some authors describe "primarily cold reflex sympathetic dystrophy" and "primarily warm reflex sympathetic dystrophy."
- Rapid fatigability: This is almost invariably present in late stages.
Physical
- The impairment of motor function is present in about 80-90% of patients at some point in the disease and consists of paresis or pseudoparalysis or clumsiness.
- Range of motion often is limited secondary to motor deficit and/or pain.
- Tremor of the affected limb is present in about half of the patients in late stages.
- Dystonia of the affected foot or hand is described in 10% of patients in late stages.
- Muscle spasms are present in 25% of patients in CRPS type 1 of longer duration.
- Hypoesthesia is described in about 70% of patients and most often is present in a glovelike or stockinglike distribution. Hemihypoesthesia also is described; hypothermesthesia and loss of proprioception are described in some cases.
- Anesthesia dolorosa is sometimes present; this means the sensitivity to touch is absent while severe pain is present in that area.
- Allodynia (ie, pain to touch) is described in 70-80% of patients.
- Hyperpathia (ie, exaggerated response to painful stimuli) is present in 70-80% of patients.
- Abnormal sweating is a sign of autonomic dysfunction. About half of the patients have hyperhidrosis.
- Edema is secondary to autonomic dysfunction. Sometimes persistent edema is caused by infection of the atrophic soft tissues.
- Altered skin color is related to vasomotor changes. Skin discoloration and atrophy can occur later. Brown-gray scaly pigmentation of the skin in the affected limb is described in some studies.
- Atrophy of soft tissue, muscles, and bones also can occur. The trophic changes are not included in the IASP criteria because so far the pathophysiology is unknown and they might result from simple disuse of the extremity.
- Altered skin temperature reflects vasomotor instability and leads to "primarily cold CRPS," "primarily warm CRPS," or "secondarily cold CRPS." At the time of assessment by a physician, approximately 5-10% do not have a significant difference in skin temperature, about 40-45% have a warmer affected extremity, and 40-45% have a colder affected extremity.
- Hypotrichoses often is noticed in the affected area. Sometimes hypertrichosis is present, and this is considered a sign of sympathetic dysfunction. However, hypotrichosis or hypertrichoses is irrelevant for establishing the diagnosis.
- Altered nail growth is also a sign of sympathetic dysfunction; however, it is not reliable for diagnostic purposes.
Causes
Most often CRPS type 1 is initiated by trauma to an extremity. Such injuries account for more than 90% of patients with CRPS type 1.
- Injuries precipitating the development of CRPS in decreasing order of frequency are as follows: (1) sprain/strain, (2) surgical wounds, (3) fractures, (4) contusion/crush injury, and (5) rarely, other injuries such as venipuncture, lacerations, burns, inflammatory processes, electric shock, and spinal cord injuries.
- Spontaneous cases/unknown causes account for approximately 5% of patients and often may be explained by minor injuries that have been forgotten.
- Unusual precipitating events supposedly accounting for CRPS type 1 include visceral lesions, CNS lesions (eg, stroke, tumors, brain injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, meningitis, syringomyelia), peripheral vascular bypass procedures, arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis, carpal tunnel surgery, and spinal cord injury.
More on Complex Regional Pain Syndromes |
Overview: Complex Regional Pain Syndromes |
| Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Complex Regional Pain Syndromes |
| Treatment & Medication: Complex Regional Pain Syndromes |
| Follow-up: Complex Regional Pain Syndromes |
| References |
| Next Page » |
References
Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. Seattle, Wash: IASP Press; 1994.
Galer BS, Schwartz L, Allen RJ. Loeser JD, Butler SH, Chapman RC, Turk DC,(eds). Complex regional pain syndromes-- Type I: reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and type II: causalgia, in: Bonica's management of pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:388- 411.
Galer BS, Jensen M. Neglect-like symptoms in complex regional pain syndrome: results of a self-administered survey. J Pain Symptom Manage. Sep 1999;18(3):213-7. [Medline].
Baron R, Levine JD, Fields HL. Causalgia and reflex sympathetic dystrophy: does the sympathetic nervous system contribute to the generation of pain?. Muscle Nerve. Jun 1999;22(6):678-95. [Medline].
Giordano J, Boswell MV. Neurobiology of nociceptive and anti-nociceptive systems. In: Manchikanti L, Singh V(eds). Interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Paducah, Kentucky: ASSIP publishing; 2007:17-32.
Kawakami, Chatenia K, Weinstein JN. AH, Schofferman JA (ed.). Anatomy, biochemistry, and physiology of low back pain, in White Spine Care: diagnosis and conservative treatment. St. Louis: Mosby Press; 1995:pp 84-103.
Wheeler AH, Murrey DB. Spinal pain: pathogenesis, evolutionary mechanisms and management. In: Pappagallo M, ed. The Neurologic Basis of Pain. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003:421-52.
Baron R, Binder A. Pappagallo M (ed). complex regional pain syndromes, in The neurological basis of pain. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005:359-378.
Bennett RM. Emerging concepts in the neurobiology of chronic pain: evidence of abnormal sensory processing in fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc. Apr 1999;74(4):385-98. [Medline].
Carlton SM, Zhou S, Coggeshall RE. Evidence for the interaction of glutamate and NK1 receptors in the periphery. Brain Res. Apr 20 1998;790(1-2):160-9. [Medline].
Mendell LM, Wall PD. Responses of Single Dorsal Cord Cells to Peripheral Cutaneous Unmyelinated Fibres. Nature. Apr 3 1965;206:97-9. [Medline].
Fields HL. Pain. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1987.
Schofferman JA. 23-6. In: White AH, Schofferman JA (eds.). Applied neurophysiology of pain, in Spine Care: diagnosis and conservative treatment. St Louis: Mosby Press; 1995.
Russell IJ. Neurochemical pathogenesis of fibromyalgia syndrome. J Musculoskeletal Pain. 1996;4:61-92.
Janig W, Koltzendbrg M. Bond MR, Charlton EJ, Woolf CJ (eds). sympathetic reflex activity and neuro- factor transmission change after chronic nerve lesions in Proceedings of the VIth world Congress on pain. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1991:365-371.
Baron R, Wasner G, Borgestedt R, et al. Effects of sympathetic activity on capsaicin-evoked pain, hyperalgesia and vasodilation Neurology. 1999;52:923-932.
Wasner G, Schattschneider J, Heckmann K, Maier C, Baron R. Vascular abnormalities in reflex sympathetic dystrophy (CRPS I): mechanisms and diagnostic value. Brain. Mar 2001;124:587-99. [Medline].
Drummond PD, Finch PM, Gibbins I. Innervation of hyperalgesic skin in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Clin J Pain. Sep 1996;12(3):222-31. [Medline].
Harden RN, Duc TA, Williams TR, Coley D, Cate JC, Gracely RH. Norepinephrine and epinephrine levels in affected versus unaffected limbs in sympathetically maintained pain. Clin J Pain. Dec 1994;10(4):324-30. [Medline].
Treede RD, Davis KD, Campbell JN, Raja SN. The plasticity of cutaneous hyperalgesia during sympathetic ganglion blockade in patients with neuropathic pain. Brain. Apr 1992;115 (Pt 2):607-21. [Medline].
Chelimsky TC, Low PA, Naessens JM, Wilson PR, Amadio PC, O'Brien PC. Value of autonomic testing in reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Mayo Clin Proc. Nov 1995;70(11):1029-40. [Medline].
Jänig W. Experimental approach to reflex sympathetic dystrophy and related syndromes. Pain. Sep 1991;46(3):241-5. [Medline].
Jänig W, Levine JD, Michaelis M. Interactions of sympathetic and primary afferent neurons following nerve injury and tissue trauma. Prog Brain Res. 1996;113:161-84. [Medline].
McLachlan EM, Jänig W, Devor M, Michaelis M. Peripheral nerve injury triggers noradrenergic sprouting within dorsal root ganglia. Nature. Jun 10 1993;363(6429):543-6. [Medline].
Shi TS, Winzer-Serhan U, Leslie F, Hokfelt T. Distribution and regulation of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors in rat dorsal root ganglia. Pain. Feb 2000;84(2-3):319-30. [Medline].
Janig W, Baron R. Complex regional pain syndrome is a disease of the central nervous system. Clin Auton Res. Jun 2002;12(3):150-64. [Medline].
Woolf CJ, Mannion RJ. Neuropathic pain: aetiology, symptoms, mechanisms, and management. Lancet. Jun 5 1999;353(9168):1959-64. [Medline].
Rommel O, Gehling M, Dertwinkel R, et al. Hemisensory impairment in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Pain. Mar 1999;80(1-2):95-101. [Medline].
Juottonen K, Gockel M, Silen T, Hurri H, Hari R, Forss N. Altered central sensorimotor processing in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Pain. Aug 2002;98(3):315-23. [Medline].
Fukumoto M, Ushida T, Zinchuk VS, Yamamoto H, Yoshida S. Contralateral thalamic perfusion in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. Lancet. Nov 20 1999;354(9192):1790-1. [Medline].
Schattschneider J, Wenzelburger R, Deuschl G, et al. Harden RN, Baron R, Janig W (eds). Kinematic analysis of the upper extremity in CRPS, in Progress in pain research and management: complex regional pain syndrome. IASP Press: Seattle; 1999:119-128.
Deuschl, Blumberg S, Jensen M. Tremor in reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Arch Neurol. 1999;48:1247-1252.
Galer BS, Butler S, Jensen MP. Case reports and hypothesis: a neglect-like syndrome may be responsible for the motor disturbance in reflex sympathetic dystrophy (Complex Regional Pain Syndrome-1). J Pain Symptom Manage. Jul 1995;10(5):385-91. [Medline].
Sandroni P, Benrud-Larson LM, McClelland RL, Low PA. Complex regional pain syndrome type I: incidence and prevalence in Olmsted county, a population-based study. Pain. May 2003;103(1-2):199-207. [Medline].
Veldman PH, Reynen HM, Arntz IE, Goris RJ. Signs and symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy: prospective study of 829 patients. Lancet. Oct 23 1993;342(8878):1012-6. [Medline].
Gellman H, Keenan MA, Stone L, Hardy SE, Waters RL, Stewart C. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy in brain-injured patients. Pain. Dec 1992;51(3):307-11. [Medline].
Rosen PS, Graham W. The shoulder-hand syndrome: historical review with observations on seventy-three patients. Can Med Assoc J. Jul 15 1957;77(2):86-91. [Medline].
Kemler MA, van de Vusse AC, van den Berg-Loonen EM, Barendse GA, van Kleef M, Weber WE. HLA-DQ1 associated with reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Neurology. Oct 12 1999;53(6):1350-1. [Medline].
Van Hilten JJ, Van De Beek WJ, Roep BO. Multifocal or generalized tonic dystonia complex regional pain syndrome: a distinct clinical in entity associated with HLA-DR13. Ann Neurol. 2000;48:113-116.
Van De Beek WJ, Roep BO, Van Der Slik AR, et al. Susceptibility loci for complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology. 2003;103:93-97.
Veldman PH, Reynen HM, Arntz IE, Goris RJ. Signs and symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy: prospective study of 829 patients. Lancet. Oct 23 1993;342(8878):1012-6. [Medline].
Allen G, Galer BS, Schwartz L. Epidemiology of complex regional pain syndrome: a retrospective chart review of 134 patients. Pain. Apr 1999;80(3):539-44. [Medline].
Low P, Wilson PR, Sandroni P, et al. Janig W, Stanton-Hicks M (eds). Clinical characteristics of patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy (sympathically maintained pain) in the United States, in Progress in Pain Research and Management: Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy: A Reappraisal. Seattle: IASP Press; 1996:49-66.
Bruehl S, Harden RN, Galer BS, et al. External validation of IASP diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and proposed research diagnostic criteria. International Association for the Study of Pain. Pain. May 1999;81(1-2):147-54. [Medline].
Baron R, Blimberg, H, Janig, W. Janig W, Stanton-Hiocks M (eds). Clinical characteristics of patients with complex regional pain syndrome in Germany, with special emphasis on vasomotor function, in Progress in Pain Research and Management: Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy: A Reappraisal. Seattle: IASP Press; 1996:25-48.
Allen G, Galer BS, Schwartz L. Epidemiology of complex regional pain syndrome: a retrospective chart review of 134 patients. Pain. Apr 1999;80(3):539-44. [Medline].
Bruehl S, Harden RN, Galer BS, Saltz S, Backonja M, Stanton-Hicks M. Complex regional pain syndrome: are there distinct subtypes and sequential stages of the syndrome?. Pain. Jan 2002;95(1-2):119-24. [Medline].
Evans JA. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1946;82:36-44.
Galer BS, Bruehl S, Harden RN. IASP diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome: a preliminary empirical validation study. International Association for the Study of Pain. Clin J Pain. Mar 1998;14(1):48-54. [Medline].
Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU, van Sonderen EL. Relationship between impairments, disability and handicap in reflex sympathetic dystrophy patients: a long term followup study. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:402-412.
Harden RN, Bruehl S, Galer BS, et al. Complex regional pain syndrome: are the IASP diagnostic criteria valid and sufficiently comprehensive?. Pain. Nov 1999;83(2):211-9. [Medline].
Kemler MA, van de Vusse AC, van den Berg-Loonen EM, Barendse GA, van Kleef M, Weber WE. HLA-DQ1 associated with reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Neurology. Oct 12 1999;53(6):1350-1. [Medline].
Kingery WS. A critical review of controlled clinical trials for peripheral neuropathic pain and complex regional pain syndromes. Pain. Nov 1997;73(2):123-39. [Medline].
Kurvers HA. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: facts and hypotheses. Vasc Med. 1998;3(3):207-14. [Medline].
Mense S. Biochemical pathogenesis of myofascial pain. J Musculoskeletal Pain. 1996;4:145-62.
Mersky H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain. Seattle: IASP Press. 1994.
Ochoa JL. Truths, errors, and lies around "reflex sympathetic dystrophy" and "complex regional pain syndrome". J Neurol. Oct 1999;246(10):875-9. [Medline].
Oerlemans HM, Oostendorp RA, de Boo T, Goris RJ. Pain and reduced mobility in complex regional pain syndrome I: outcome of a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial of adjuvant physical therapy versus occupational therapy. Pain. Oct 1999;83(1):77-83. [Medline].
Oerlemans HM, Oostendorp RA, de Boo T, Perez RS, Goris RJ. Signs and symptoms in complex regional pain syndrome type I/reflex sympathetic dystrophy: judgment of the physician versus objective measurement. Clin J Pain. Sep 1999;15(3):224-32. [Medline].
Pappagallo M. Complex regional pain syndromes. Neurology Reviews. 2000;25-29.
Portenoy RK. Davis Company. In: Neuropathic Pain. Philadelphia: FA: Pain Management: Theory and Practice.; 1996:83-125.
Roberts WJ. A hypothesis on the physiological basis for causalgia and related pains. Pain. Mar 1986;24(3):297-311. [Medline].
Rommel O, Malin JP, Zenz M, Janig W. Quantitative sensory testing, neurophysiological and psychological examination in patients with complex regional pain syndrome and hemisensory deficits. Pain. Sep 2001;93(3):279-93. [Medline].
Sandroni P, Benrud-Larson LM, McClelland RL, Low PA. Complex regional pain syndrome type I: incidence and prevalence in Olmsted county, a population-based study. Pain. May 2003;103(1-2):199-207. [Medline].
Schurmann M, Gradl G, Andress HJ, Furst H, Schildberg FW. Assessment of peripheral sympathetic nervous function for diagnosing early post-traumatic complex regional pain syndrome type I. Pain. Mar 1999;80(1-2):149-59. [Medline].
Thimineur MA, Saberski L. Complex regional pain syndrome type I (RSD) or peripheral mononeuropathy? A discussion of three cases. Clin J Pain. Jun 1996;12(2):145-50. [Medline].
van der Laan L, ter Laak HJ, Gabreels-Festen A, Gabreels F, Goris RJ. Complex regional pain syndrome type I (RSD): pathology of skeletal muscle and peripheral nerve. Neurology. Jul 1998;51(1):20-5. [Medline].
Veldman PH, Reynen HM, Arntz IE, Goris RJ. Signs and symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy: prospective study of 829 patients. Lancet. Oct 23 1993;342(8878):1012-6. [Medline].
Wasner G, Binder A, Kopper F, Baron R. No effect of sympathetic sudomotor activity on capsaicin-evoked ongoing pain and hyperalgesia. Pain. Feb 2000;84(2-3):331-8. [Medline].
Zyluk A. The natural history of post-traumatic reflex sympathetic dystrophy. J Hand Surg Br. Feb 1998;23(1):20-3. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
acute peripheral trophoneurosis, algodystrophy, causalgia, chronic traumatic edema, mimocausalgia, neurovascular posttraumatic painful syndrome, neurovascular reflex dystrophy, neurovascular reflex sympathetic dystrophy, posttraumatic chronic edema, posttraumatic osteoporosis, posttraumatic pain syndrome, posttraumatic sympathetic dystrophy, RSD, shoulder-hand syndrome, spreading neuralgia, Sudeck atrophy, sympathalgia, thermalgia, traumatic angiospasm, traumatic vasospasm, complex regional pain syndrome type 1
Overview: Complex Regional Pain Syndromes