Overview
Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive, image-guided therapy used to relieve pain from a vertebral body fracture. It has been used for osteoporotic or malignant fractures. Initially, the major indication was treatment of spinal hemangiomas, as described in 1987 by Galibert et al.[1] With experience, other indications have emerged. Vertebroplasty can increase patient mobility, decrease narcotic needs, and prevent further vertebral collapse.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) usually involves percutaneous injection of a cement, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), into the vertebral bodies. Occasionally, PMMA has been placed manually into vertebral lesions during open surgical operations.
For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Back, Ribs, Neck, and Head Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Vertebral Compression Fracture.
Indications
Percutaneous vertebroplasty is indicated for painful osteoporotic or neoplastic vertebral compression fractures refractory to medical therapy.
Osteoporotic vertebral fracture
Osteoporosis is complicated by vertebral fracture that occurs spontaneously or is caused by minor trauma (see eMedicine's Osteoporosis and Spinal Cord Injury article for more details). In the United States, the incidence of compression fractures is more than 500,000 patients per year, which is higher than the incidence of hip fractures. Lifetime risk of osteoporotic vertebral fracture is 16% in women and 5% in men.[2]
These vertebral fractures are often highly painful and are treated with immobilization, analgesic drugs, and specific treatment of osteoporosis. Immobilization increases demineralization. Initial symptoms tend to disappear in 4-6 weeks. In spite of long-term medical treatment, some patients have severe, persistent, incapacitating pain. Later consequences of vertebral fracture are reduced height, kyphosis, and chronic back pain.
Multiple retrospective and prospective studies have favorably compared vertebroplasty to medical management. The VERTOS study prospectively compared osteoporotic compression fracture treatment of 18 patients with vertebroplasty to 16 patients with optimal medical management.[3] This study found significant short-term improvement in pain relief and function in the vertebroplasty group.[3] These results were confirmed with the Vertos II larger prospective randomized trial (101 patients were treated with vertebroplasty and 101 were treated with conservative management).[4]
However, 2 widely discussed recent studies comparing vertebroplasty to sham procedures demonstrated no significant improvement with vertebroplasty.[5, 6] This mixed evidence has sparked considerable debate as to the appropriate role of this procedure.
Spinal tumors
In painful vertebral metastasis (ie, previously untreated), radiotherapy is useful in 70% of patients to alleviate spinal pain, but this effect is delayed and may require 2-6 weeks. Vertebroplasty is a palliative treatment that typically provides more immediate analgesia.
Vertebral hemangioma
Vertebroplasty has been used successfully in severe focal spinal pain with radiologically unaggressive vertebral (body) hemangioma.
Contraindications
Absolute contraindications[7]
- Asymptomatic fracture
- Active osteomyelitis of the target vertebra
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy
- Allergy to vertebroplasty cement or opacifying agent
Relative contraindications[7]
- Significant central canal narrowing from retropulsion of bony fragment or epidural tumor
- Ongoing systemic infection
- Myelopathy or radiculopathy from fracture level
Technique
Equipment
Multiple vertebroplasty kits are available. A Stryker precision delivery system costs approximately $600-700; a physician can customize it for $200. Materials include the following:
Materials and devices for percutaneous vertebroplasty - Needle (11G, 6" [DBMNJ1106]); polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement (Howmedica Simplex Codman Cranioplastic Kit); barium (opacifying agent, sterile barium sulfate, 6-g packets); syringes (1-cc Luer-Lok syringes). - Needle, 6 in (DBMNJ1106-11G, MD Technologies)
- PMMA cement (Howmedica Simplex)
- Barium (opacifying agent) - Sterile barium sulfate, 6-g packets (Bryant Corporation)
- Luer-Lok syringes, 1 mL
Preprocedure patient evaluation
Confirm appropriate history and perform a brief physical examination to confirm the appropriateness of the procedure (of note, localizing tenderness on palpation is not associated with superior vertebroplasty response[8] ).
Review the patient's record, including plain films and MRI, to identify the vertebra to be injected. Exclude significant central canal narrowing or signs of infection on MRI. Double check vertebral counting, particularly with thoracic lesions.
Obtain informed consent.
Setup and positioning
Procedure time varies from 30-120 minutes.
- Conscious sedation (midazolam and fentanyl) and local anesthesia are used in almost all patients.
- Prophylactic antibiotics should be considered.
- Place the patient in the prone position.
- Align posterior ribs to obtain a good lateral view.
- On the anteroposterior (AP) view, find the obliquity that projects the pedicle over the upper outer third of the vertebral body. Mark this point.
Radiation exposure
A study was performed evaluating patient and operator radiation exposure during 11 vertebroplasty cases. Patient effective doses were estimated at 34mGy with average fluoroscopy times of 28 minutes (in comparison, a typical CT abdomen and pelvis effective dose is 8-14 mGy). Operator exposures were highest to the hands and chest, although there was a decrease in occupational dose by 76% with the use of mobile shielding. It was estimated that an operator could perform 150 procedures annually before exceeding annual dose constraints.[9]
Needle placement
Use lidocaine for local anesthesia. Use a spinal needle to anesthetize the periosteum.
Confirm proper needle path with AP and lateral fluoroscopic views.
For large pedicles (ie, lumbar, lower thoracic), use an 11-gauge needle; use a 13-gauge needle for smaller pedicles (ie, midthoracic).
While maintaining good back tension with a large clamp, use a sterile hammer to gently tap the needle. Direct the needle into the vertebral body, using AP and lateral views for verification.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty, transpedicular approach.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty, transpedicular approach under fluoroscopic guidance, lateral view.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty, transpedicular approach under fluoroscopic guidance, anteroposterior view. - For a unipedicular approach, advance needle into the anterior third of the central vertebral body.
- For a bipedicular approach, advance needles into the midportion of the hemivertebrae.
- A parapedicular approach may be considered as well.
Polymethylmethacrylate mixing and injection procedure
Mix polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and barium sulfate (opacifying agent) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Slowly inject this mixture until the vertebral body is well filled, making certain to stop before PMMA leaks posteriorly into the epidural area or significantly fills a vein.
Although many practitioners attempt to fill the vertebral body as completely as possible, note that pain relief is not associated with cement volume.[10]
Postprocedure care
Keep patients on bed rest for 1-2 hours.
Administer analgesics for postoperative pain and muscle relaxants for significant muscle spasms, as needed.
Ensure that the patient's primary care physician is medically managing osteoporosis; if he or she is not, management must be instituted. Without systemic osteoporosis therapy, 20% of patients with a fracture develop a second fracture.[11] Treatment for osteoporosis includes DEXA scans, lifestyle modifications (smoking cessation, alcohol moderation, exercise), dietary supplementation (calcium, vitamin D), and medical management (antireabsorbatives).[12] See eMedicine's Osteoporosis article for more details.
Complications
Chiras et al reported incidents and complications in 274 patients.[13] These complications were more common with malignant spinal tumor (10%) and vertebral hemangioma (2-5%) than with osteoporotic lesions (1-3%).
Major complications occur in < 1% of patients treated for osteoporosis-related compression fractures; minor complications occur in < 2% of these patients. In patients with neoplastic involvement, major complications occur in < 5% and minor complications occur in approximately 10%.
Complications include the following:
- Neurologic defect (from central canal or neural foraminal narrowing)
- Fracture of vertebra, rib, or sternum (from positioning on table or placement of needle)
- Infection
- Allergic reaction
- Hemorrhage
If a patient experiences new radicular pain, a CT scan may show migration of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) into the epidural venous plexus. New vertebral region pain may be evaluated with MRI to exclude adjacent fracture. Chest pain may be evaluated with a rib series or CT pulmonary angiogram to exclude rib fracture or pulmonary embolus. Severe back pain can indicate a fractured pedicle or transverse process, which is observed easily on CT scan. Paralysis has been reported but is very uncommon. Precautions should be taken while injecting above L1, with attention to the posterior vertebral body wall; do not allow PMMA to flow into the epidural venous plexus.
Reports are mixed as to whether vertebroplasty predisposes patients to develop additional vertebral fractures.[14]
Conclusion
Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive procedure with promising results for the treatment of vertebral fracture. It provides significant pain relief with the potential for improving functional outcome.
Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D. [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty]. Neurochirurgie. 1987;33(2):166-8. [Medline].
Lips P. Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis. Am J Med. Aug 18 1997;103(2A):3S-8S; discussion 8S-11S. [Medline].
Voormolen MH, Mali WP, Lohle PN, Fransen H, Lampmann LE, van der Graaf Y, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with optimal pain medication treatment: short-term clinical outcome of patients with subacute or chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The VERTOS study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Mar 2007;28(3):555-60. [Medline].
Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. Sep 25 2010;376(9746):1085-92. [Medline].
Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. Aug 6 2009;361(6):557-68. [Medline].
Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Wilson DJ, Diamond TH, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med. Aug 6 2009;361(6):569-79. [Medline].
American College of Radiology: Practice Guideline for the Performance of Vertebroplasty. Revised 2009. [Full Text].
Rad AE, Kallmes DF. Pain relief following vertebroplasty in patients with and without localizing tenderness on palpation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Oct 2008;29(9):1622-6. [Medline].
Fitousi NT, Efstathopoulos EP, Delis HB, Kottou S, Kelekis AD, Panayiotakis GS. Patient and staff dosimetry in vertebroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Nov 1 2006;31(23):E884-9; discussioin E890. [Medline].
Kaufmann TJ, Trout AT, Kallmes DF. The effects of cement volume on clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Oct 2006;27(9):1933-7. [Medline].
Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB, et al. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. Jan 17 2001;285(3):320-3. [Medline].
Kearns AE, Kallmes DF. Osteoporosis primer for the vertebroplasty practitioner: expanding the focus beyond needles and cement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Nov 2008;29(10):1816-22. [Medline].
Chiras J, Depriester C, Weill A, et al. [Percutaneous vertebral surgery. Technics and indications]. J Neuroradiol. Jun 1997;24(1):45-59. [Medline].
Trout AT, Kallmes DF. Does vertebroplasty cause incident vertebral fractures? A review of available data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Aug 2006;27(7):1397-403. [Medline].
Bostrom MP, Lane JM. Future directions. Augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral bodies. Spine. Dec 15 1997;22(24 Suppl):38S-42S. [Medline].
Cardon T, Hachulla E, Flipo RM, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrylic cement in the treatment of a Langerhans cell vertebral histiocytosis. Clin Rheumatol. Sep 1994;13(3):518-21. [Medline].
Chiras J, Sola-Martinez MT, Weill A. [Percutaneous vertebroplasty]. Rev Med Interne. 1995;16(11):854-9. [Medline].
Cortet B, Cotten A, Boutry N, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteolytic metastases or multiple myeloma. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. Mar 1997;64(3):177-83. [Medline].
Cortet B, Cotten A, Boutry N, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study. J Rheumatol. Oct 1999;26(10):2222-8. [Medline].
Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology. Aug 1996;200(2):525-30. [Medline].
Cotten A, Duquesnoy B. Vertebroplasty: current data and future potential. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. Nov 1997;64(11):645-9. [Medline].
Dean JR, Ison KT, Gishen P. The strengthening effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Clin Radiol. Jun 2000;55(6):471-6. [Medline].
Deramond H, Depriester C, Toussaint P. [Vertebroplasty and percutaneous interventional radiology in bone metastases: techniques, indications, contra-indications]. Bull Cancer Radiother. 1996;83(4):277-82. [Medline].
Dudeney S, Lieberman I. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study. J Rheumatol. Oct 2000;27(10):2526. [Medline].
Gangi A, Kastler BA, Dietemann JL. Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Jan 1994;15(1):83-6. [Medline].
Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, et al. Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford). Dec 2000;39(12):1410-4. [Medline].
Jensen ME, Dion JE. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. Aug 2000;10(3):547-68. [Medline].
Kaemmerlen P, Thiesse P, Bouvard H, et al. [Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of metastases. Technic and results]. J Radiol. Oct 1989;70(10):557-62. [Medline].
Lee MJ, Dumonski M, Cahill P, Stanley T, Park D, Singh K. Percutaneous treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of complications. Spine. May 15 2009;34(11):1228-32. [Medline].
Murphy KJ, Deramond H. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in benign and malignant disease [In Process Citation]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. Aug 2000;10(3):535-45. [Medline].
Padovani B, Kasriel O, Brunner P, Peretti-Viton P. Pulmonary embolism caused by acrylic cement: a rare complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Mar 1999;20(3):375-7. [Medline].
Patel G, Singh S, Singh M. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: minimally invasive procedure for vertebral fracture. Abstract presented at: AAPM Annual Meeting. 2001.
Rapado A. General management of vertebral fractures. Bone. Mar 1996;18(3 Suppl):191S-196S. [Medline].
Rousing R, Andersen MO, Jespersen SM, Thomsen K, Lauritsen J. Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared to conservative treatment in patients with painful acute or subacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: three-months follow-up in a clinical randomized study. Spine. Jun 1 2009;34(13):1349-54. [Medline].
Singh M, Gallagher R, Mitch A. Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Osteoporosis Foundation Guidelines. 2001;In press.
Singh, S. Percutaneous vertebroplasty. In: Waldman SD, ed. Interventional Pain Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co;2001:707-12.
Tamayo-Orozco J, Arzac-Palumbo P, Peon-Vidales H, et al. Vertebral fractures associated with osteoporosis: patient management. Am J Med. Aug 18 1997;103(2A):44S-48S; discussion 48S-50S. [Medline].
Trout AT, Kallmes DF, Gray LA, Goodnature BA, Everson SL, Comstock BA, et al. Evaluation of vertebroplasty with a validated outcome measure: the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Nov-Dec 2005;26(10):2652-7. [Medline].

