Marchiafava-Bignami Disease 

  • Author: Jennifer Ault, DO, DPT; Chief Editor: B Mark Keegan, MD, FRCPC   more...
 
Updated: Feb 3, 2012
 

Background

Marchiafava-Bignami disease (MBD) is a rare condition characterized by demyelination of the corpus callosum. It is seen most often in patients with chronic alcoholism. (See Etiology and Pathophysiology.)

In 1903, Italian pathologists Marchiafava and Bignami described 3 alcoholic men who died after having seizures and coma. In each patient, the middle two thirds of the corpus callosum was found to be severely necrotic. Through the years, the medical literature accumulated hundreds of cases of MBD.[1] Most of these cases were found in alcoholic men.

With the advent of computed tomography (CT) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), more cases of MBD have been recognized than before. Analyses of such cases have revealed several patterns, including scattered lesions or cysts observed at intervals from the front to the back of the callosum. Nearby areas (eg, anterior commissure, posterior commissure, brachium pontis, other white-matter tracts) and the centrum semiovale are frequently involved. (See Workup.)

In 2007, Celik et al reported a case of a nonalcoholic patient with acute MBD that was associated with a gynecologic malignancy. The authors raised the question of a possible paraneoplastic MBD.[2] That same year, Rusche-Skolarus et al described a case of MBD in a postoperative, nonalcoholic female who presented with an encephalopathy. (See Etiology and Pathophysiology.)[3]

Subtypes of MBD

In 2004, Heinrich et al described 2 clinical subtypes of MBD as follows, based on a review of 50 radiologic cases diagnosed in vivo[4] :

  • Type A - Has predominant features of coma and stupor; this subtype is associated with a high prevalence of pyramidal-tract symptoms; radiologic features include involvement of the entire corpus callosum
  • Type B - Characterized by normal or mildly impaired mental status; radiologic features are partial or focal callosal lesions (see the image below). T2-weighted axial image in a patient with MarchiafT2-weighted axial image in a patient with Marchiafava-Bignami disease showing a high-signal lesion in the corpus callosum.
Next

Etiology and Pathophysiology

Alcoholism remains the greatest risk factor for MBD, although rare cases have occurred in individuals who did not drink alcohol. Nutritional factors have been suspected in MBD, but no specific nutrient has been identified. Electrolyte disturbances (as in central pontine myelinolysis) may be important.

Although the callosal lesions are the hallmark of the disease, for years some cases of MBD were known to be associated with cortical damage in addition to damage to the white matter tracts of the corpus callosum. Generally, the cortical damage was in the lateral frontal and the temporal lobes, mainly in the third (although sometimes also in the fourth) cortical layer. In these areas, the neurons degenerated and were replaced by glial cells. In 1939, Morel described this as cortical laminar sclerosis (now known as Morel cortical laminar sclerosis).[5]

Although Morel did not report an association between cortical laminar sclerosis and MBD, many subsequent authors did, including Jequier and Wildi in 1956[6] and Delay et al in 1959.[7, 8] Indeed, Ropper et al stated in 2005,[9] in Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology, that Jequier and Adams (in an otherwise unpublished review) reexamined Morel's slides and found evidence of MBD in all of those cases. Thus, the prevailing view has generally been that Morel cortical laminar sclerosis is secondary to MBD.

Nevertheless, in 1978, Naeije et al reported a case of Morel cortical laminar sclerosis in an alcoholic woman who did not have MBD.[10] In addition, Okeda et al reported 3 cases of cortical laminar sclerosis in 1986 in patients who had various combinations of pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis but who did not have MBD.[11] One of these patients had alcoholic cirrhosis and 2 had malignancies.

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scanning has yielded interesting pathophysiologic data related to MBD. In a published case reported by Ferracci et al in 1999, SPECT scanning showed a bilateral reduction in cerebral blood flow. The patient had left hemispatial neglect in addition to the expected left-handed apraxia and agraphia.[12]

In 2003, Gambini et al used magnetic resonance spectroscopy to suggest that an inflammatory reaction accompanies demyelination and necrosis.[13] In 2005, Johkura et al reported 2 cases in which lateral and frontal cortical lesions, in addition to corpus callosal lesions, were seen on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging.[14]

In 2006, Nardone et al reported on a partially recovered patient with MBD who demonstrated impairment of transcallosal inhibition. When performed properly, transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex elicits excitatory responses in contralateral hand muscles and suppresses tonic voluntary activity in ipsilateral muscles. The corpus callosum conveys the inhibitory signal. This inhibition was reduced this patient.[15]

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Although this disease occurs in both sexes, most cases are found in men. Most cases of MBD occur in persons older than 45 years.

Alcohol abuse is such a common problem that underdiagnosis of MBD seems likely (although now, with the availability MRI, fewer cases are going undiagnosed). In addition, many cases of MBD may be diagnosed but not reported, and autopsies are largely not performed. Hence, the disease may be more common than thought, and the overall outcome may be better than previously believed.

Occurrence in the United States

MBD is a very rare condition. In 2001, Helenius et al wrote that they had found approximately 250 cases in published reports, although they also suggested that many cases had gone undiagnosed.[16]

The authors of this article have estimated that approximately 300 cases of MBD turned up in published reports between 1966 and November 2008. Another 40 or 50 cases have been mentioned in textbooks that are too old to have been included in the author's PubMed search.

International occurrence

International cases of MBD are similar to US cases, but 1 additional detail deserves mention. Some of the old literature on MBD suggested that this condition was more common in Italians. This was solely an artifact of the initial cases having been found in Italy and the fact that, at first, Italian physicians were apparently the only investigators interested in finding such cases. MBD has since been found in persons from all over the world.

It is now firmly believed that no national, geographic, ethnic, or racial predilection is known for MBD. However, with such few reports, the numbers of cases reported from each country could not be expected to be exactly in proportion to the population size of each country. In 2006, Staszewski et al described the first case in Poland, which was detected by MRI.[17]

Previous
Next

Prognosis

In the era before CT scanning, MBD was found almost exclusively at autopsy. Patients with the condition usually died from the effects of alcoholism and typically had severe neuropsychological deficits before death. Helenius et al reported in 2004 that among approximately 250 known patients with MBD, 200 died, 30 remained severely demented or bedridden, and only 20 had a favorable outcome. If the underlying cause of MBD is alcoholism, the prognosis is poor unless the patient adheres to an alcohol treatment program.

However, modern CT scanning and MRI have allowed the detection of mild cases of the disease, and some patients have recovered with minimal deficits. Moreover, data suggest an improved overall prognosis for MBD.

The prognosis for MBD is correlated with the subtype, as follows:

  • Type A - Has a long-term disability rate of 86% and a mortality rate of 21%
  • Type B - Has a long-term disability rate of 19% and a mortality rate of 0%

Radiologic findings

In a 2004 review of acute and chronic cases of MBD, Heinrich et al separated most cases into 2 groups. Group A included the worst cases, in which patients presented with coma or other severe impairment of consciousness. On MRI scans, their lesions typically involved most or all of the corpus callosum. For example, in the acute phase, the entire corpus callosum was commonly hyperintense on T2-weighted MRI scans. As the lesions evolved, considerable necrosis occurred, and cystic areas of necrosis were present in most or many regions of the corpus callosum. The death rate for patients with such presentations was high (21%), and those who lived frequently had severe deficits.

In group B, patients had little or no impairment of consciousness. Their deficits were subtle and included various cognitive difficulties and signs of impaired interhemispheric information transfer, gait disturbances, dysarthria, limb hypotonia, and rare seizures or upper motor neuron signs. Initial hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted MRI scans were limited to a few areas of the corpus callosum. Some cystic necrotic areas developed over time, but they were fewer and smaller than those in type A. No deaths occurred in this group, and patients frequently had good recoveries.

The authors did not attempt to correlate the severity of the cases with the presumed causes. Patients with the most severe alcoholism might have been in group A, but this is speculation. In both groups, the amount of early callosal edema in the acute phase often markedly exceeded the areas of ultimate cystic necrosis.

In 2006, Menegon et al reported 6 patients with MBD in whom (1) the entire corpus callosum appeared to be affected by a reduced apparent diffusion coefficient, as seen on diffusion-weighted imaging studies, and (2) lateral and frontal cortical lesions were also detected by diffusion-weighted imaging. Menegon et al suggested, on the basis of the outcomes of their patients, that such a combination of findings was a harbinger of poor outcome for cognitive recovery and for survival.[18]

However, as pointed out by Khaw et al in 2006,[19] the older literature, such as that by Brion, from 1977,[20] does not support a correlation between laminar sclerosis and bad outcome. In addition, studies such as that by Hlaihel et al from 2006[21] do not support a correlation between reduced apparent diffusion coefficient and poor prognosis or even with irreversibility of the lesion.

Finally, they noted that cortical MRI findings have not been definitively correlated with the specific pathology of Morel cortical laminar sclerosis. However, if indeed they represent laminar sclerosis, the fact that this is present in the acute or subacute stages of MBD may force a reevaluation of the thought that laminar sclerosis is a secondary consequence of the MBD.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Jennifer Ault, DO, DPT  Resident Physician, Department of Neurology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Jennifer Ault, DO, DPT is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Osteopathy, American Medical Association, and American Physical Therapy Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Stephen A Berman, MD, PhD, MBA  Professor of Neurology, University of Central Florida College of Medicine

Stephen A Berman, MD, PhD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Neurology, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Eric Dinnerstein, MD  Consulting Staff Neurologist, Maine Medical Partners Neurology

Eric Dinnerstein, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology

Disclosure: Janssen Pharmaceuticals Grant/research funds PI conpensation

Mardjohan Hardjasudarma, MD, MS  Chief of Neuroradiology, Program Director, Professor, Departments of Clinical Radiology and Ophthalmology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in Shreveport

Mardjohan Hardjasudarma, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, American Society of Neuroradiology, Canadian Medical Association, Ontario Medical Association, Pennsylvania Medical Society, and Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

B Mark Keegan, MD, FRCPC  Assistant Professor of Neurology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic; Master's Faculty, Mayo Graduate School; Consultant, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester

B Mark Keegan, MD, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Medical Association, and Minnesota Medical Association

Disclosure: Novartis Consulting fee Consulting; Bionest Consulting fee Consulting

Additional Contributors

Jonathan S Rutchik, MD, MPH Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California at San Francisco

Jonathan S Rutchik, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and Society of Toxicology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Reference Salary Employment

Florian P Thomas, MD, MA, PhD, Drmed Director, Spinal Cord Injury Unit, St Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Director, National MS Society Multiple Sclerosis Center; Director, Neuropathy Association Center of Excellence, Professor, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Associate Professor, Institute for Molecular Virology, and Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, St Louis University School of Medicine

Florian P Thomas, MD, MA, PhD, Drmed is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Neurological Association, American Paraplegia Society, Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, and National Multiple Sclerosis Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Marchiafava E, Bignami A. Sopra un alterazione del corpo calloso osservata in soggetti alcoolisti. Riv Patol Nerv. 1903;8:544.

  2. Celik Y, Temizoz O, Genchellac H, Cakir B, Asil T. A non-alcoholic patient with acute Marchiafava-Bignami disease associated with gynecologic malignancy: paraneoplastic Marchiafava-Bignami disease?. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. Jul 2007;109(6):505-8. [Medline].

  3. Rusche-Skolarus LE, Lucey BP, Vo KD, Snider BJ. Transient encephalopathy in a postoperative non-alcoholic female with Marchiafava-Bignami disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007;109:713-5.

  4. Heinrich A, Runge U, Khaw AV. Clinicoradiologic subtypes of Marchiafava-Bignami disease. J Neurol. Sep 2004;251(9):1050-9. [Medline].

  5. Morel F. Une forme anatomo-clinique particuliere de l;alcoolisme chronique: Sclerose corticale laminaire alcoolique. Rev Neurol. Rev Neurol. 1939;71:280-288.

  6. Jequier M, Wildi E. Not Available. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1956;77(1-2):393-415. [Medline].

  7. DELAY J, BRION S, ESCOUROLLE R, SANCHEZ A. [Necrosis of the Marchiafava-Bignami corpus callosum and Morel's cortical laminar sclerosis.]. Rev Neurol (Paris). Oct 1959;101:560-2. [Medline].

  8. DELAY J, BRION S, ESCOUROLLE R, SANCHEZ A. [Relation between Marchiafava-Bignami degeneration of the corpus callosum and Morel's cortical laminar sclerosis (apropos of 5 anatomo-clinical case reports).]. Encephale. 1959;48:281-312. [Medline].

  9. Ropper AH, Brown RH. Chapter 41 Diseases of the Nervous System due to Nutritiozal Deficiency. Marchiafava-Bignami Disease(Primary Degeneration of theCorpus Callosum). In: Principles of Neurology. 2005;998-999.

  10. Naeije R, Franken L, Jacobovitz D, et al. Morel's laminar sclerosis. Eur Neurol. 1978;17(3):155-9. [Medline].

  11. Okeda R, Kitano M, Sawabe M, et al. Distribution of demyelinating lesions in pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis--three autopsy cases including one case devoid of central pontine myelinolysis. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1986;69(3-4):259-66. [Medline].

  12. Ferracci F, Conte F, Gentile M, et al. Marchiafava-Bignami disease: computed tomographic scan, 99mTc HMPAO-SPECT, and FLAIR MRI findings in a patient with subcortical aphasia, alexia, bilateral agraphia, and left-handed deficit of constructional ability. Arch Neurol. Jan 1999;56(1):107-10. [Medline].

  13. Gambini A, Falini A, Moiola L, et al. Marchiafava-Bignami disease: longitudinal MR imaging and MR spectroscopy study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Feb 2003;24(2):249-53. [Medline].

  14. Johkura K, Naito M, Naka T. Cortical involvement in Marchiafava-Bignami disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Mar 2005;26(3):670-3. [Medline].

  15. Nardone R, Venturi A, Buffone E, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation shows impaired transcallosal inhibition in Marchiafava-Bignami syndrome. Eur J Neurol. Jul 2006;13(7):749-53. [Medline].

  16. Helenius J, Tatlisumak T, Soinne L, et al. Marchiafava-Bignami disease: two cases with favourable outcome. Eur J Neurol. May 2001;8(3):269-72. [Medline].

  17. Staszewski J, Macek K, Stepien A. [Reversible demyelinisation of corpus callosum in the course of Marchiafava-Bignami disease]. Neurol Neurochir Pol. Mar-Apr 2006;40(2):156-61. [Medline].

  18. Menegon P, Sibon I, Pachai C, et al. Marchiafava-Bignami disease: diffusion-weighted MRI in corpus callosum and cortical lesions. Neurology. Aug 9 2005;65(3):475-7. [Medline].

  19. Khaw AV, Heinrich A. Marchiafava-Bignami disease: diffusion-weighted MRI in corpus callosum and cortical lesions. Neurology. Apr 25 2006;66(8):1286; author reply 1286. [Medline].

  20. Brion S. Marchiafava-Bignami disease. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW, eds. Handbook of clinical neurology. Amsterdam: North H; 1977:317.

  21. Hlaihel C, Gonnaud PM, Champin S, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in Marchiafava-Bignami disease: follow-up studies. Neuroradiology. Jul 2005;47(7):520-4. [Medline].

  22. Hirayama K, Tachibana K, Abe N, Manabe H, Fuse T, Tsukamoto T. Simultaneously cooperative, but serially antagonistic: a neuropsychological study of diagonistic dyspraxia in a case of Marchiafava-Bignami disease. Behav Neurol. 2008;19(3):137-44. [Medline].

  23. Fang SC. EEG coherence for a patient with Marchiafava-Bignami disease. Clin EEG Neurosci. October 2007;38(pt 4):207.

  24. Lee SH, Kim SS, Kim SH, Lee SY. Acute Marchiafava-Bignami disease with selective involvement of the precentral cortex and splenium: a serial magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurologist. Jul 2011;17(4):213-7. [Medline].

  25. Yoshizaki T, Hashimoto T, Fujimoto K, Oguchi K. Evolution of Callosal and Cortical Lesions on MRI in Marchiafava-Bignami Disease. Case Rep Neurol. Mar 23 2010;2(1):19-23. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  26. Sair HI, Mohamed FB, Patel S, Kanamalla US, Hershey B, Hakma Z, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber-tracking in Marchiafava-Bignami disease. J Neuroimaging. Jul 2006;16(3):281-5. [Medline].

  27. Ihn YK, Hwang SS, Park YH. Acute Marchiafava-Bignami disease: diffusion-weighted MRI in cortical and callosal involvement. Yonsei Med J. Apr 30 2007;48(2):321-4. [Medline].

  28. Kikkawa Y, Takaya Y, Niwa N. [A case of Marchiafava-Bignami disease that responded to high-dose intravenous corticosteroid administration]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. Nov 2000;40(11):1122-5. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
T2-weighted axial image in a patient with Marchiafava-Bignami disease showing a high-signal lesion in the corpus callosum.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.