Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Multiple Sclerosis Treatment & Management

  • Author: Christopher Luzzio, MD; Chief Editor: Jasvinder Chawla, MD, MBA  more...
 
Updated: Jun 16, 2016
 

Approach Considerations

Treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has 2 aspects: immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) for the underlying immune disorder and therapies to relieve or modify symptoms. IMT is directed toward reducing the frequency of relapses and slowing progression. Currently, most disease-modifying agents have been approved for use only in relapsing forms of MS. Mitoxantrone (see below) is also approved for the treatment of secondary (long-term) progressive and progressive relapsing MS.

Although therapy for clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (a single episode of neurologic symptoms) with immunomodulatory medications has not yet become standard practice throughout the world, trials such as the TOPIC trial suggest that early intervention may be appropriate. Decisions regarding early treatment of relapsing MS can be guided by using the McDonald diagnostic criteria.

Results from the multicenter TOPIC trial provide evidence that treatment of clinically CIS with the drug teriflunomide delays conversion to MS.[78] Patients with CIS have a high likelihood of developing MS.

In the study, 618 patients were treated either with teriflunomide in doses of 14 mg or 7 mg per day or placebo.[78] Patients were included if they experienced a first acute or subacute well-defined neurologic event consistent with demyelination, onset of MS symptoms within 90 days of randomization, and MRI showing 2 or more characteristics of MS. During 2 years of treatment, patients receiving 14 mg of teriflunomide experienced a 43% reduction in the risk for conversion to clinically definite MS compared with placebo. Patients who received 7 mg of the drug per day had a 37% reduction in the risk for conversion vs placebo.[78]

Given the wide spectrum of clinical manifestations that MS can produce, patients may require consultations with a variety of specialists. Indeed, patients with MS are often best served by a multidisciplinary approach.

Next

Emergency Department Management

Medical management goals that are sometimes achievable in the emergency department are to relieve symptoms and to ameliorate risk factors associated with an acute exacerbation. In patients with fulminant MS or disseminating acute encephalitis, management involves the following:

  • Stabilize acute life-threatening conditions
  • Initiate supportive care and seizure precautions
  • Monitor for increasing intracranial pressure

Consider intravenous steroids, IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), or emergent plasmapheresis. One study suggested that plasmapheresis may be superior to IV steroids in patients with acute fulminant MS.[79] The 2011 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) plasmapheresis guideline update states that plasmapheresis is possibly effective and may be considered in acute fulminant demyelinating CNS disease.[5]

Identification and control of known precipitants of MS exacerbation include the following:

  • Aggressively treat infections with antibiotics
  • In patients with a fever, normalize the body temperature with antipyretics, as even small increases in temperature can strongly affect conduction through partially demyelinated fibers
  • Provide urinary drainage and skin care, as appropriate

Preoperative considerations for emergency surgery in patients with fulminant MS are as follows:

  • Gastric emptying may be delayed secondary to autonomic GI dysfunction
  • Lability of the autonomic nervous system may precipitate hypotension during anesthesia and surgery
  • Spontaneous ventilation may be disrupted
Previous
Next

Treatment of Acute Relapses

Methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol) can hasten recovery from an acute exacerbation of MS. There is no clear evidence that it changes the overall disease progression.

Plasma exchange (plasmapheresis) can be used short term for severe attacks if steroids are contraindicated or ineffective. The 2011 AAN guideline for plasmapheresis in neurological diseases categorizes plasmapheresis as “probably effective” as second-line treatment for relapsing MS exacerbations that do not respond to steroids.[5]

Texts commonly describe anti-inflammatory treatment as an option for acute transverse myelitis and acute disseminated encephalitis; however, not many supporting data are given. Dexamethasone is commonly used. Anti-inflammatory treatment for ON is very controversial.

Previous
Next

Immunomodulatory Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting MS

Disease-modifying therapies have shown beneficial effects in patients with relapsing MS, including reduced frequency and severity of clinical attacks. These agents appear to slow the progression of disability and the reduce accumulation of lesions within the brain and spinal cord. The disease-modifying agents for MS (DMAMS) currently approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) include the following:

Fingolimod, teriflunomide, and dimethyl fumarate are administered orally; natalizumab and mitoxantrone are administered by intravenous infusion; interferon beta-1a (Avonex) is administered intramuscularly; and interferon beta-1a (Rebif), interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate are administered by subcutaneous injection. 

Note that in January 2013, the FDA approved a single-use autoinjector (Rebidose, EMD Serono Inc./Pfizer Inc) for self-injection of interferon beta-1a (Rebif) in patients with relapsing forms of MS.[22] Approval was based on a 12-week open-label, single-group study in 109 patients that examined ease of use, patient satisfaction and acceptability, and functional reliability. The autoinjector is available in a monthly pack in 22 and 44 μg doses and in a titration pack.[22]

Patient lifestyle, patient tolerance, and adverse effects of injections should be considered in the choice of DMAMS. To a certain extent, health-care-provider preference and experience with the medications also play a role in determining which drug is appropriate in a particular situation.

A case-control study from the MSBase longitudinal cohort found that MS patients who are well controlled on injectable drugs but switch to oral therapies aren't at greater risk of early relapse. This is the first study to compare early relapse switch probability in the period immediately following switch to oral treatment in a population previously stable on injectable therapy. Results showed there were no differences in the rate of first relapse or disability progression over the first 6 months.[80]

Interferon beta-1b therapy

The first medication approved by the FDA for MS, in 1993, was interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, Extavia). It is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of MS to reduce the frequency of clinical exacerbations. It has shown efficacy in patients who have experienced a first clinical episode of MS and have MRI features consistent with MS.[7]

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 372 patients with relapsing-remitting MS, interferon beta-1b (8 million IU every other day) decreased the frequency of relapses by 34% after 2 years. In treated patients, the MRI T2 lesion burden increased 3.6% over 5 years, compared with 30.2% in the placebo group. At 5 year follow-up, the incidence of disease progression was lower in the interferon beta-1b group compared with the placebo group (35% versus 45%).[81]

Interferon beta-1b is administered every other day subcutaneously by self-injection. The most frequently reported adverse reactions include asthenia, depression, flu-like symptoms, hypertonia, increased liver enzymes, injection site reactions, leukopenia, and myasthenia. Interferon beta-1b can be coadministered with analgesics or antipyretics to help with the occurrence of flu-like symptoms.[7]

Interferon beta-1a (Avonex or Rebif) therapy

In a study of 301 patients with relapsing-remitting disease who were given weekly intramuscular injections (6 million U [30 µg]) of interferon beta-1a (Avonex), the annual exacerbation rate decreased 29%.[82] Over 2 years, disease progression occurred in 21.9% of patients in the interferon beta-1a group and 34.9% of those in the placebo group. In addition, MRI data showed a decrease in the mean lesion volume and number of enhancing lesions in the interferon beta-1a group.

In Europe and Canada, higher doses of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (Rebif) were studied in the Prevention of Relapse and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis (PRISMS) Study.[83] The dose-comparison study of interferon beta-1a reported a 27% reduction in the relapse rate in patients receiving 66 µg/wk and a 33% reduction in those receiving 132 µg/wk. This study, of 560 patients with relapsing-remitting disease, also demonstrated a significant reduction in accrual of disability and MRI lesion burden with the higher dose.[83]

In 2002, the FDA approved interferon beta-1a (Rebif) in 22 µg and 44 µg formulations given 3 times per week.

In the Evidence of Interferon Dose-response: European North American Comparative Efficacy (EVIDENCE) trial, which compared 2 preparations of interferon beta-1a (Rebif and Avonex), relapse occurred less frequently with 44 µg 3 times weekly (Rebif) than with 30 µg once weekly (Avonex) (25% vs 37%).[84] In addition, the mean number of active unique MRI lesions per patient per scan was lower in the Rebif than in the Avonex group (0.17 vs 0.33). Patients on Rebif experienced fewer flulike symptoms, but more injection site reactions, hepatic function disorders, and white blood cell disorders. Rebif-treated patients had a higher incidence of neutralizing antibodies (Nabs). A reduced MRI effect was noted for Nab-positive patients on Rebif compared with Nab-negative patients on Rebif. However, Nab-positive Rebif patients had better clinical and comparable MRI results to Avonex patients.[84]

In a subsequent crossover phase of the EVIDENCE trial, patients who were originally randomized to low-dose weekly treatment were switched to the high-dose 3-times-weekly regimen for an additional 8 months. These patients demonstrated significant reductions in mean relapse rates compared with the last 6 months on Avonex (P < .001).[85]

In patients with uncontrolled depression, interferons should be used with caution. Glatiramer may be an appropriate choice in such cases.

Peginterferon beta-1a

Peginterferon beta-1a (Plegridy) was approved by the FDA in August 2014 for treatment of relapsing forms of MS. It is the first pegylated interferon approved for MS and can be self-administered by SC injection every 2 weeks.[8]

Approval was based on results from the ADVANCE trial of >1,500 patients with MS over a 2-year period. In the first year of the trial, peginterferon beta-1a dosed every 2 weeks significantly reduced annualized relapse rate (ARR) at 1 year by 36% compared with placebo (P = 0.0007). Risk of 12-week confirmed disability progression, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale, was also reduced with peginterferon beta-1a by 38% (P = 0.0383) compared with placebo. Peginterferon beta-1a also significantly reduced the number of new gadolinium-enhanced [Gd+] lesions by 86% (P < 0.0001) and reduced new or newly enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions by 67% (P < 0.0001) compared with placebo.[8]

Glatiramer acetate

Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) is a synthetic polypeptide approved for the reduction of the frequency of relapses in patients with relapsing-remitting MS, including patients who have experienced a first clinical episode and have MRI features consistent with MS. Glatiramer acetate’s mechanism of action is unknown, but this agent could theoretically modify some of the immune processes thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of MS.[9]

In a double-blind trial that included 251 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), treatment with glatiramer acetate 20 mg SC once daily resulted in a 29% reduction in the relapse rate over 2 years; a positive effect on disability was suggested but this effect was not shown on predetermined disability measures in this trial.[86] For this reason, glatiramer acetate is not approved by the FDA for slowing disability progression in MS. A follow-up open-label study demonstrated continued efficacy of glatiramer over 6 years.[87]

In January 2014, a higher dose and lower-frequency dosage regimen of glatiramer was approved. The 20-mg/mL SC injection is specific for the original once-daily regimen, whereas the new 40-mg/mL SC injection is specific for the 3-times-per-week dosage regimen. Approval for the new regimen was based on the phase 3 Glatiramer Acetate Low-Frequency Administration (GALA) study. The GALA trial included 1,404 patients and showed that treatment with 40 mg SC 3 times/wk reduced mean annualized relapse rates by 34% compared with placebo (0.331 vs 0.505; P < .0001) at 12 months.[88]

Natalizumab

Natalizumab (Tysabri) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the adhesion molecule alpha-4 integrin, inhibiting its adherence to its receptors. Natalizumab is indicated as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of MS, to delay the accumulation of physical disability and reduce the frequency of clinical exacerbations. It is generally used in patients who have not responded to a first-line disease-modifying therapy or who have very active disease.[11]

In a placebo-controlled clinical trial, the use of natalizumab reduced the relapse rate (68%) and progression of disability (42%) over a period of 2 years.[89] Natalizumab is given as a 300 mg IV infusion over 1 hour every 4 weeks.

Natalizumab has been associated with progressive multifocal leukocephalopathy (PML), an opportunistic infection of the brain that can lead to death or severe disability. The risk of PML seems to increase with a history of previous immunosuppression, duration of exposure to natalizumab beyond 2 years, and JC virus antibody positivity.

Three cases of PML associated with natalizumab use prompted its temporary withdrawal from the market in 2005; however, it was reapproved in 2006 by the FDA for commercialization under a special restricted distribution program known as Tysabri Outreach Unified Commitment to Health (TOUCH). Use of natalizumab is limited to patients, physicians, and infusion centers that are registered with the TOUCH program.

A retrospective review of 906 patients from 5 clinical trials by Cadavid et al found that after treatment with natalizumab, disabled patients with relapsing-remitting MS were more likely to complete a timed 25-foot walk significantly faster; responders took an average of 24–44% less time to walk 25 ft than nonresponders. Natalizumab also appeared to have some efficacy in disabled patients with SPMS.[90]

Fingolimod

Fingolimod (Gilenya) is the first oral disease modifying treatment for relapsing forms of MS approved by the FDA. Like other disease-modifying agents for MS, fingolimod can reduce the frequency of clinical exacerbations and delay the accumulation of physical disability. The recommended dosage for fingolimod is 0.5 mg once a day.[13]

Fingolimod is a novel compound produced by chemical modification of a fungal precursor. Its active metabolite, formed by in vivo phosphorylation, modulates sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors, which are a subset of a larger family of cell-surface, G protein–coupled receptors that mediate the effects of bioactive lipids known as lysophospholipids. Lysophospholipids are membrane-derived bioactive lipid mediators that can affect fundamental cellular functions, which include proliferation, differentiation, survival, migration, adhesion, invasion, and morphogenesis.

The mechanism of action of fingolimod is incompletely understood but appears to be fundamentally different from other MS medications. Fingolimod-phosphate blocks the capacity of lymphocytes to egress from lymph nodes, reducing the number of lymphocytes in peripheral blood. Fingolimod promotes sequestration of lymphocytes within the lymph nodes, which may reduce lymphocyte migration into the central nervous system.[91]

Fingolimod can be associated with macular edema, pulmonary dysfunction, and cardiac adverse effects.

In 2012, the FDA determined that new label changes are required for fingolimod. Within an hour of administering fingolimod, heart rate decreases are noted. The nadir in heart rate typically occurs at 6 hours, but it can be observed up to 24 hours after the first dose in some patients. Because of its cardiac adverse effects, the first dose of fingolimod should be administered in a setting in which resources are available to appropriately manage symptomatic bradycardia. Therefore, all patients started on fingolimod must be monitored for at least 6 hours following the first dose. Additionally, an ECG should be performed prior to dosing fingolimod, blood pressure and pulse should be monitored hourly, and an ECG should be performed at the end of the observation period.

Additional observation beyond 6 hours should be instituted if bradycardia occurs and until the finding has resolved in the following situations: the heart rate 6 hours post dose is less than 45 beats per minute, the heart rate 6 hours post dose is the lowest value observed post dose, or the ECG 6 hours post dose shows new-onset second-degree or higher (atrioventricular) AV block.

Should a patient require pharmacologic intervention for symptomatic bradycardia, continuous overnight ECG monitoring in a medical facility should be instituted, and the first dose monitoring strategy (described above) should be repeated after the second dose of fingolimod.

Fingolimod is now contraindicated in patients with recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina, transient ischemic attack (TIA), decompensated heart failure requiring hospitalization, or class III/IV heart failure; history or presence of Mobitz type II second- or third-degree AV block or sick-sinus syndrome, unless the patient has a functioning pacemaker; baseline QTc interval greater than or equal to 500 ms; or treatment with class Ia or class III antiarrhythmic drugs.

The following are recommendations for the use of fingolimod in patients with preexisting cardiovascular conditions:

  • Patients with some preexisting conditions (eg, ischemic heart disease, history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, history of cardiac arrest, cerebrovascular disease, history of symptomatic bradycardia, history of recurrent syncope, severe untreated sleep apnea, AV block, and sinoatrial heart block) may poorly tolerate the fingolimod-induced bradycardia or may experience serious rhythm disturbances after the first dose of fingolimod.
  • Prior to treatment, these patients should have a cardiac evaluation by a physician appropriately trained to conduct such an evaluation, and, if treated with fingolimod, should be monitored overnight with continuous ECG in a medical facility after the first dose.
  • Since initiation of fingolimod treatment results in decreased heart rate and may prolong the QT interval, overnight continuous ECG monitoring is recommended in patients who have prolonged QTc interval before or during the 6-hour observation (>450 ms males, >470 ms females), are at higher risk for QT prolongation (eg, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, congenital long-QT syndrome), are on concurrent therapy with drugs that prolong the QT interval, and have a known risk of torsades de pointes. The list of drugs associated with risk of torsades de pointes can be found at AzCERT (CredibleMeds).

The following are recommendations for the use of fingolimod with concomitant medications that slow the heart rate or AV conduction:

  • Experience is limited when coadministered with drugs that slow the heart rate or AV conduction (eg, beta-blockers, heart rate–lowering calcium channel blockers such as diltiazem, verapamil, or digoxin).
  • Because the initiation of fingolimod treatment is also associated with slowing of the heart rate, coadministration of other drugs that cause bradycardia may be associated with severe bradycardia or heart block.
  • The possibility to switch to drugs that do not slow the heart rate or AV conduction should be evaluated by the prescribing physician before initiating fingolimod. In patients who cannot switch, overnight continuous ECG monitoring is recommended after the first dose.

The reduction of peripheral lymphocyte count by fingolimod can possibly lead to an increased risk of infection. Reversible, asymptomatic elevations of liver enzymes may also occur. Other adverse reactions that have been commonly reported include headache, diarrhea, ALT/AST elevations and back pain.

If an MS patient is being switched from natalizumab to fingolimod oral therapy, a washout period of 8 weeks or less is advisable. In an observational cohort study involving 350 such patients, those with a washout time longer than 2 months had a higher risk of relapse; in a second study involving 142 patients, shorter washout periods of 8 or 12 weeks were associated with fewer active lesions and less disease recurrence than was a washout period of 16 weeks.[92, 93, 94]

Teriflunomide

Teriflunomide (Aubagio) was approved by the FDA in September 2012 for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of MS (approved tablet forms are 7 mg and 14 mg). The prescribing information contains a black box warning for the risks of hepatotoxicity and teratogenicity (pregnancy category X). It is an oral pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor for treatment of relapsing forms of MS. Approval was based on a randomized trial (TEMSO) of 1088 patients with a minimum of 1 relapse in the previous year or 2 relapses in the last 2 years. Teriflunomide was shown to significantly reduce annualized relapse rates (31% relative risk reduction compared with placebo [P < .001]). It was also shown in the TEMSO trial to reduce disability progression at doses of 14 mg/day.[95] However, the FDA has not approved the use of teriflunomide to slow disability progression.

Phase III of the TEMSO study found that teriflunomide significantly slowed brain volume loss compared with placebo over 2 years in patients with relapsing MS. Data obtained from MRI were used to assess patients treated with 14 mg or 7 mg of the drug, or placebo. By month 12, median percent reduction from baseline in brain volume was 0.39, 0.40, and 0.61 for teriflunomide 14 mg, 7 mg, and placebo, respectively.[96]

The most common adverse reactions of teriflunomide are headache, alopecia, diarrhea, nausea, increased ALT, influenza, and paresthesias.

Teriflunomide can predispose to infections (due to a decrease in the white blood cell count that remains throughout treatment) and increases in blood pressure. To assess safety, it is recommended to obtain transaminase levels, bilirubin levels, and a CBC count within 6 months before initiation; screen for latent tuberculosis infection with a tuberculin skin test; and check the blood pressure before the first dose and periodically thereafter.

Teriflunomide is contraindicated in patients with severe hepatic impairment, patients who are pregnant or women of childbearing potential not using reliable contraception, or patients on current treatment with leflunomide. If liver injury occurs, teriflunomide should be immediately discontinued and an accelerated elimination procedure using either activated charcoal or cholestyramine should be initiated. Monitor liver tests weekly until normalized.

Upon discontinuing teriflunomide and based on the teratogenicity risk, it is recommended that all women of child-bearing potential undergo the accelerated elimination procedure, which includes verification of teriflunomide plasma concentrations less than 0.02 mg/L (0.02 mcg/mL). Human plasma concentrations of teriflunomide less than 0.02 mg/L (0.02 mcg/mL) are expected to pose minimal risk. Without an accelerated elimination procedure, it takes teriflunomide on average of 8 months (and up to 2 y) to reach plasma concentrations less than 0.02 mg/L.

Teriflunomide or its parent compound, leflunomide, can also be associated with peripheral neuropathy and acute renal failure, hyperkalemia, hypophosphatemia, serious skin reactions, and interstitial lung disease.

Other trials for teriflunomide (TOWER) are completed (not yet published) or ongoing. Results from the TENERE study (n= 324) observed similar efficacy and safety between teriflunomide and interferon beta-1a for relapsing forms of MS.[97] Another study of teriflunomide added to beta interferon therapy is currently ongoing.[98]

Dimethyl fumarate

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral Nrf2 pathway activator indicated for relapsing forms of MS. The active metabolite, monomethyl fumarate (MMF), activates the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) pathway, a transcription factor encoded by the NFE2L2 gene.

FDA approval for DMF in adults with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis[15, 16] was based on data from 2 phase 3 studies, the DEFINE[17] and CONFIRM[18] studies, that involved more than 2600 patients. An ongoing extension study (ENDORSE) includes some patients that have been followed for longer than 4 years.

In the DEFINE trial, dimethyl fumarate significantly reduced[17] : (1) the proportion of patients who relapsed by 49%, (2) the annualized relapse rate by 53%, and (3) the 12-week confirmed disability progression, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), by 38% relative to placebo at 2 years. In the CONFIRM study, dimethyl fumarate significantly reduced the annualized relapse rate by 44% and the proportion of patients who relapsed by 34% compared with placebo at 2 years.[18] Although not statistically significant, dimethyl fumarate also showed a 21% reduction in the CONFIRM trial's 12-week confirmed disability progression.[18] Both studies also showed that dimethyl fumarate significantly reduced lesions in the brain relative to placebo, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging.[17, 18]

Alemtuzumab

Alemtuzumab (Lemtrada) was approved by the FDA in November 2014 for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Because of the risk for severe autoimmune adverse effects, it is reserved for use in patients who have an inadequate response to 2 or more other drugs for MS. Alemtuzumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody against CD52 (lymphocyte antigen). This action promotes antibody-dependent cell lysis.

Approval was based on 2 randomized Phase III open-label rater-blinded studies comparing treatment with alemtuzumab to high-dose subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (Rebif) in patients with relapsing remitting MS who were either new to treatment (CARE-MS I) or who had relapsed while on prior therapy (CARE-MS II). In CARE-MS I, alemtuzumab was significantly more effective than interferon beta-1a at reducing annualized relapse rates; the difference observed in slowing disability progression did not reach statistical significance.[19] In CARE-MS II, alemtuzumab was significantly more effective than interferon beta-1a at reducing annualized relapse rates, and accumulation of disability was also significantly slowed.[20] The clinical development program for alemtuzumab use in MS involved nearly 1,500 patients with more than 6,400 patient-years of safety follow-up.[21]

In a single-arm, open-label study in 45 patients with MS that was refractory to treatment with interferon, alemtuzumab effectively reduced relapse rates and improved clinical scores.[99]

In subsequent subgroup analysis of 101 MS patients with multiple recent relapses and MRI-detected gadolinium-enhancing lesions, researchers found alemtuzumab to be more effective than interferon.[100] The study showed that after 2 years, almost a quarter of patients had achieved a disease activity–free state, whereas none of those treated with interferon and reached such a state.

In this study, disease activity–free was defined as no relapse, no sustained accumulation of disability (SAD) as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and no new gadolinium-enhancing lesions or new or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions.[100] Relapses occurred in 35.8% of the alemtuzumab group and 60.0% of the interferon group. Respective percentages for SAD were 7.4% and 17.5%; for gadolinium-enhancing lesion activity, 22.1% and 52.5%; and for T2 lesion activity, 60.0% and 92.5%.

Daclizumab

Daclizumab (Zinbryta) was approved by the FDA in May 2016 for relapsing forms of MS. It is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the high-affinity interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor subunit (CD25). These subunits are expressed at high levels on T-cells that become abnormally activated in multiple sclerosis. Approval was based on results from 2 trials, DECIDE and SELECT, in which daclizumab 150 mg was administered SC every 4 wk in people with relapsing-remitting MS. In the DECIDE trial, daclizumab was compared with interferon beta-1a (30 mcg/wk IM). The annualized relapse rate was lower with daclizumab than with interferon beta-1a (0.22 vs. 0.39; 45% lower rate with daclizumab; P<0.001).[142] The SELECT trial showed daclizumab he annualized relapse rate was lower for patients given daclizumab compared with placebo (54% reduction, 95% CI 33-68%; p<0·0001).[143]

Previous
Next

Treatment of Aggressive MS

High-dose cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) has been used for induction therapy to stabilize aggressive MS. In a retrospective study of 32 patients, Harrison et al reported that induction with cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg IV infusion over 4 days) followed by long-term maintenance therapy with glatiramer was well tolerated and appeared to be effective in reducing the risk of relapse, disability progression, and new MRI lesions.[101] Adverse effects of cyclophosphamide include leukemia, lymphoma, infection, and hemorrhagic cystitis.

Mitoxantrone is an immunosuppressive agent approved for reducing neurologic disability and/or the frequency of clinical relapses in patients with secondary (long-term) progressive, progressive relapsing, or worsening relapsing-remitting MS. Mitoxantrone is not indicated in the treatment of patients with primary progressive MS.

Mitoxantrone has a black-box warning for cardiotoxicity. The risk of cardiotoxicity increases with cumulative mitoxantrone dose and can occur whether or not cardiac risk factors are present. Mitoxantrone therapy in MS patients and in patients with cancer increases the risk of developing secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Mitoxantrone also has a black-box warning for secondary leukemia. Mitoxantrone treatment in MS patients and in patients with cancer increases the risk of developing secondary AML.

Previous
Next

Immunomodulatory Therapy for Progressive MS

Currently, no approved treatments are available for primary progressive MS (PPMS). A literature review by Rojas et al indicated that interferon beta could not be linked to reduced disability progression in patients with PPMS.[102] The authors also stated, however, that the studies reviewed employed too few patients to permit a definitive conclusion to be drawn.

Patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) who experience relapses are sometimes started on a DMAMS approved for relapsing-remitting MS. Methotrexate has shown some effectiveness in delaying progression of impairment of the upper extremities in patients with SPMS.[103] }

In a European study of SPMS, patients receiving interferon beta-1b showed a highly significant delay in time to disease progression. FDA approval has not been granted yet for this indication, however.[104, 105, 106]

Mitoxantrone is another treatment option for progressive MS. It is approved for reducing neurologic disability and/or the frequency of clinical relapses in patients with secondary (long-term) progressive, progressive relapsing, or worsening relapsing remitting MS, but not for primary progressive MS.

Previous
Next

Experimental Agents

Oral agents that are under development, including laquinimod and cladribine.[107, 108] Another experimental agent under intense investigation for use in MS includes ocrelizumab (anti-CD20 antibody) which has shown promise in early clinical developmental trials.[110]

In a randomized, double-blind trial involving 30 patients with relapsing-remitting MS, a skin patch delivering a mixture of 3 myelin peptides (MBP85-99, PLP139-151, and MOG35-55) significantly reduced the number of gadolinium-enhanced (Gd+) lesions on MRI, as well as reduced the annual relapse rate in patients wearing the patch for 1 year.[111, 112] The most common adverse effect in those receiving myelin peptides was local reaction in the area of the skin patch, followed by redness and moderate itching.

Previous
Next

Treatment of MS in Pregnancy

Confavreux et al found that the frequency of MS relapses decreases during pregnancy, particularly in the third trimester, when it drops by as much as 70%.[113] In the first 3 months post partum, however, the frequency of relapses returns to the prepregnancy rate, probably as a result of postpregnancy hormone loss. Overall, pregnancy does not have a negative effect on the course of MS. Initial data suggested that breast-feeding reduced MS relapses, but the most recent study found no significant benefit.[114]

Few negative outcomes have been reported with exposure to interferon beta or glatiramer during pregnancy, which suggests the possibility of offering treatment until conception.[114] However, the absence of conclusive data should not encourage physicians to treat patients who are pregnant with these agents; the use of disease-modifying treatments in women planning to become pregnant should be considered on a case-by-case basis, weighing the risks of drug exposure against risks of relapses. Agents with known teratogenicity risks, such as teriflunomide (Aubagio), are clearly contraindicated in this setting.

Previous
Next

Symptom Management

Treatment of symptoms is an essential part of the management of MS. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures can be used to address the following:

  • Fatigue
  • Spasticity
  • Bladder problems
  • Bowel problems
  • Cognitive dysfunction
  • Pain
  • Paroxysmal symptoms
  • Sexual dysfunction
  • Tremor
  • Heat intolerance
  • Optic neuritis

Cognitive dysfunction

Cognitive dysfunction is a major problem that affects quality of life, family and social relationships, and employment. Cognitive dysfunction can impact memory, comprehension, problem solving, and speech. Treatment for cognitive dysfunction in patients with MS should include supportive therapy provided by speech pathologists or occupational therapists. In addition, depression may contribute to cognitive dysfunction and should be treated if it is diagnosed.

Pharmacologic therapy has not been shown to be beneficial for cognitive impairment in MS. For example, a multicenter randomized clinical trial in MS patients with memory impairment found that donepezil (Aricept) was no better than placebo for improving memory.[115]

Depression

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are preferred for treating depressive symptoms in patients with MS. Second-line treatment options include the use of tricyclic antidepressants. The anticholinergic side effects of tricyclic antidepressants may be helpful to patients with symptoms of bladder spasticity or chronic pain. For more information, see the Medscape Reference article Depression.

Fatigue

Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling symptom of MS, occurring in approximately 76-92% of MS patients.[116] Fatigue can worsen before and during exacerbations and with increased temperatures. There are no FDA-approved drugs for treatment of MS-related fatigue.

Amantadine is perhaps the first-line drug for treatment of fatigue in MS, although this is an off-label use. The usual dosage is 100 mg orally twice a day. Approximately 40% of MS patients experience some fatigue relief with amantadine. Pemoline was found to be effective in some people, but it was removed from the US market in 2005 after the FDA concluded that the overall risk of liver toxicity from pemoline outweighs the benefits.[117]

Other drugs that have been tried in fatigue management include methylphenidate and fluoxetine (Prozac). A disadvantage of methylphenidate is that it is a controlled substance, with potential for abuse. Methylphenidate has been recommended at dosages of 10-60 mg/day in 2-3 divided doses, using extreme caution. For patients with concurrent depression, fluoxetine may be tried to manage both problems.

Modafinil (Provigil), a drug approved for the treatment of narcolepsy, has demonstrated some success in MS patients at doses of 200 mg/day. In addition, armodafinil (Nuvigil) has also been suggested as being helpful with fatigue.

Nonpharmacologic treatment of fatigue involves energy conservation, work simplification, scheduled rest periods, and the use of cooling garments (eg, vest, hat, collar). Regular exercise also may help alleviate fatigue.

Medications used in MS management often can contribute to fatigue. These drugs include analgesics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, muscle relaxants, sedatives, and immune-modulating medications.

Pain

Pain can be a common occurrence in patients with MS, with 30-50% of patients experiencing pain at some time in the course of their illness. Treatment for pain accounts for nearly 30% of the medications used for symptom management in MS patients.[118]

Pain in MS may be primary or secondary, and the two may be experienced at the same time. Primary pain is related to the demyelinating process and is often characterized as having a burning, gnawing, or shooting quality. Tricyclic antidepressants are first-line drugs for primary pain. Anticonvulsants, such as carbamazepine, phenytoin, and gabapentin, can be added as second-line agents.

Secondary pain in MS is primarily musculoskeletal in nature, possibly due to poor posture, poor balance, or the abnormal use of muscles or joints as a result of spasticity. Pharmacologic agents for this type of pain include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or other analgesics. The use of narcotics is seldom indicated.

Heat intolerance

Steps to manage heat intolerance are as follows:

  • Time outside activities for early morning or evening hours to avoid the heat of the day
  • Spread activities throughout the course of the day to avoid overheating
  • Use air conditioning in homes and cars, cooling garments, light-colored clothes, and wide-brimmed hats
  • Avoid exposure to saunas, hot tubs, or even hot showers or baths
  • Avoid exposure to excessive humidity; dehumidifiers can help indoors
  • Treat fevers aggressively with around-the-clock antipyretics.

Spasticity

Treat spasticity when it interferes with function, mobility, positioning, hygiene, or activities of daily living. Reducing spasticity can give the patient more freedom of movement with less energy expenditure, as well as avoiding complications such as pain, contractures, and decubitus.

Spasticity can be managed through nonpharmacologic means. Pharmacologic treatment of spasticity includes baclofen (Gablofen, Lioresal), which is particularly useful for the relief of flexor spasms and concomitant pain, clonus, and muscular rigidity in MS patients with reversible spasticity. Baclofen is effective in most cases, is inexpensive, and is titrated easily from 10-140 mg/day in divided doses. Adverse effects include fatigue and weakness.

Second-line agents include benzodiazepines (eg, diazepam, clonazepam). These agents can be sedating and habit-forming; however, for patients who also have sleep disorders, the sedative effects can be beneficial, allowing the clinician to manage the spasticity and the sleep problem with a single medication. For patients with cognitive impairment, benzodiazepines may be contraindicated due to their adverse CNS effects.

Dantrolene sodium (Dantrium) acts directly on skeletal muscle to decrease spasticity. This agent is used less frequently than baclofen because of its hepatotoxicity at higher doses and numerous drug interactions.

The anticonvulsant drug gabapentin (Neurontin) is particularly useful in patients who experience spasticity and neuropathic pain. It is easily titrated from 300 to 3600 mg/day in divided doses. However, along with being relatively expensive, gabapentin often causes significant sedation, which is effectively dose limiting.

Tizanidine (Zanaflex), a centrally acting alpha-adrenergic agonist, is also used to manage spasticity. Tizanidine has effects similar to those of baclofen, but it produces less weakness and more sedation. This drug is titrated from 2 to 32 mg/day in divided doses.

Additional treatments for severe spasticity management include intramuscular botulinum toxin, phenol nerve blocks, and intrathecal baclofen pump placement. Because of their greater invasiveness, these treatments are usually reserved for the most difficult cases.

Impaired ambulation

Oral, sustained-release dalfampridine (Ampyra) has been shown to improve walking ability in patients with MS. It is the only medication approved by the FDA for this indication for MS patients.

Fourteen weeks of treatment with dalfampridine was found to improve walking ability in a significant percentage of patients in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial (which was not limited to any specific form of MS).[119] The mechanism of action of dalfampridine appears to be restoration of action potential conduction via blockade of an as-yet uncharacterized subset of potassium channels in demyelinated axons.

An increased risk of seizures has been observed in patients taking dalfampridine; therefore, it is contraindicated in patients with a history of seizures. Most seizure events in patients taking dalfampridine occur within days to weeks after starting the recommended dose, and they happen in patients without a history of seizures. Because dalfampridine is eliminated through the kidneys and its blood levels (along with the risk of seizures) can be enhanced in patients with kidney dysfunction, now the FDA has changed the dalfampridine label (July 2012) to recommend that kidney function be checked in patients before starting the drug (moderate-to-severe renal impairment is a contraindication) and monitored at least annually while the treatment continues. Additionally, patients who miss a dose of should not take an extra dose, since an extra dose can increase seizure risks. Dalfampridine should be discontinued permanently if a seizure occurs.

For details on recommendations to patients and physicians, see FDA Drug Safety Communication: Seizure risk for multiple sclerosis patients who take Ampyra (dalfampridine).

Urinary tract infections have been reported more frequently in patients receiving dalfampridine 10 mg twice daily (12%) than in those receiving placebo (8%).[120]

Bladder problems

Bladder dysfunction in MS may consist of failure to store, failure to empty, or a combination of the two. Interventions for failure to store include the following[121] :

  • Scheduled voiding
  • Limiting fluid intake in the evening
  • Using anticholinergic medications (eg, oxybutynin)
  • Eliminating diuretics (eg, caffeine)
  • Injecting onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) into the bladder [122]

Failure to empty is characterized by a large, flaccid bladder and an inability of the urinary sphincter to relax. Symptoms include urgency, frequency, hesitancy, nocturia, incontinence, incomplete emptying, and frequent urinary tract infections. Interventions include intermittent catheterization or the use of alpha-blockers (eg, prazosin) and, possibly, the Crede maneuver.

Combined dysfunction is due to incoordination of the detrusor and sphincter (dyssynergia). Symptoms in combined dysfunction are similar to those of failure to empty. Interventions may include anticholinergic medications or intermittent catheterization.

Bladder problems usually can be managed appropriately after a careful history, physical examination, and urinalysis. If initial attempts at symptom management are not effective, more studies, such as renal ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography, renal scanning, or urodynamic studies, may be indicated to better characterize the problem. Recurrent urinary tract infections are common in MS patients with end-stage bladder disability.

Bowel problems

Constipation, the most common bowel problem in MS patients, may result from neurogenic bowel, immobility, or restricted fluid intake. The first step in management of constipation is to increase fluid intake to 8-10 cups daily and increase dietary fiber to 15 g.

Next, it is essential to establish a consistent bowel program time. A bowel program is most effective if done at least every other day and preferably after a meal, which takes advantage of the body's gastrocolic reflex. Sitting in an upright position, rather than lying in bed, permits gravity to assist in evacuation. The patient should also be involved in an exercise program, consisting of walking or simply performing chair exercises.

Pharmacologic management of constipation includes stool softeners, bulk formers, or laxatives. Stool softeners, such as docusate sodium, work by decreasing surface tension, allowing water to enter the stool. Bulk formers (eg, Metamucil, Per Diem, Citrucel, FiberCon) work by increasing the bulk and weight of the stool. Laxatives act as an irritant to the bowel, increasing peristalsis; they generally work within 8-12 hours. Examples include milk of magnesia and Peri-Colace.

For patients with a neurogenic bowel or with poor abdominal muscle tone, rectal suppositories may be part of an effective bowel program that can help prevent incontinence episodes. Suppositories provide rectal stimulation and lubricate the stool. Typically, they act within 30 minutes to 1 hour. Examples include bisacodyl and glycerin.

Nonpharmacologic techniques of bowel management include proper positioning, abdominal massage, and digital stimulation. Abdominal massage performed in the direction of bowel peristalsis, from ascending toward the descending colon, can be useful. Finally, digital stimulation, in which a lubricated finger is inserted gently into the rectum and moved side to side along the wall of the rectum, can stimulate a bowel movement.

Diarrhea

Diarrhea, if it occurs, typically is not related to MS per se. Rather, it is more likely from fecal impaction, diet, irritation of the bowel, or overuse of laxatives or stool softeners. Diarrhea may also be an adverse effect of medications.

Diarrhea is treated first by eliminating the cause and then, possibly, with bulk formers (eg, psyllium). Drugs that slow the muscles of the bowel, such as Lomotil (diphenoxylate and atropine) are rarely indicated.

Sexual dysfunction

Sexual dysfunction in patients with MS may be associated with other symptoms of the disease, such as fatigue, spasticity, depression and bowel dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction is common in men with MS and may be treated with oral phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors such as sildenafil (Viagra), tadalafil (Cialis), or vardenafil (Levitra, Staxyn); for more information, see Erectile Dysfunction. Penile prostheses are an alternative for men with erectile dysfunction who do not respond to medical management.

Tremor

Tremor is difficult to manage in MS patients. Several treatments have been used for tremor, with little success. Treatments have included anticonvulsants, isoniazid, primidone, benzodiazepines, propranolol, and ondansetron.

Optic neuritis

In the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT), patients recovered visual function regardless of whether they were treated with oral prednisone, intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), or placebo.[123] However, patients who received IVMP recovered faster. IVMP also seemed to decrease the incidence of the development of MS over a 2-year period, but this effect was not sustained after year 3. Patients treated with oral prednisone demonstrated an increased incidence of recurrent optic neuritis compared with those who were administered IVMP or placebo.

Previous
Next

Rehabilitation

Patients with MS may benefit from referral to physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech therapists. Speech therapists assess the patient's speech, language, and swallowing abilities and may work with the patient on compensatory techniques to manage cognitive problems.

Physical therapy

Physical therapists provide assessment of gross motor skills (eg, ambulation) and assessment and training in appropriate assistive devices to improve mobility in patients with MS. They evaluate and train the patient in appropriate exercise programs to decrease spasticity, maintain range of motion, strengthen muscles, and improve coordination. They also provide invaluable input into the prescription of appropriate seating systems for the nonambulatory patient.

Physical therapy for spasticity in patients with MS includes the establishment of a stretching program in which joints are moved slowly to positions that stretch the spastic muscles. Each position is held for at least a minute to allow the stretched muscle to slowly relax. Stretching exercises may be performed in a cool (85°F) pool, which provides buoyancy and cooling. Mechanical aids, such as ankle-foot orthoses, also can be useful in spasticity management.

Nonpharmacologic treatments for primary pain in MS, such as the use of imagery or distraction, can be helpful. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is useful in some patients.

Nonpharmacologic treatment for secondary pain includes moist moderate heat, massage, physical therapy, and exercise (eg, stretching). Devices such as the WalkAide and Bioness use functional electrical stimulation to aid walking and may be helpful to some MS patients.

Occupational therapy

Occupational therapists are skilled in assessing the patient's functional abilities in completing activities of daily living, assessing fine motor skills, and evaluating for adaptive equipment and assistive technology needs. They can provide treatment for cognitive dysfunction.

Treatment approaches for cognitive dysfunction include cognitive retraining and the use of compensatory strategies. Cognitive retraining involves the employment of repetitive drills and mentally stimulating exercises designed to strengthen areas of cognition that are weak.

Compensatory strategies emphasize coping methods or organizational skills to help patients use their strengths to compensate for areas of relative weakness. Such strategies can include the following:

  • Maintaining a consistent routine
  • Making lists
  • Keeping a daily planner
  • Organizing the home or work environment

In providing education on MS management to patients with cognitive impairment, it is important to involve family or caregivers in training, provide step-by-step instructions, and present information in a visual and verbal format. New topics should be presented at times when fatigue is less likely to be an issue.

Previous
Next

Surgery for Alleviating Symptoms

Surgical procedures that relate to MS are directed primarily at alleviating symptoms, such as dysphagia, significant limb spasticity or contractures, or severe neuropathic pain. Measures include gastrojejunal tube placement, adductor leg muscle tendon release, and rhizotomy, respectively.

Intrathecal pumps for delivery of antispasticity medications (eg, baclofen) can be implanted surgically. Caution should be used with baclofen pumps due to the risk of malfunction and baclofen overdose.

Previous
Next

Deterrence and Prevention

Preliminary evidence suggests that persons with high circulating levels of vitamin D are at lower risk of MS[33] ; thus, vitamin D supplementation may reduce the risk of developing MS and of conversion from a first clinical event suggestive of MS to clinically definite MS. Vitamin D may also reduce the relapse rate among patients with relapsing-remitting MS.[124]

For healthy individuals, serum vitamin D concentrations of 50-125 nmol/L (20-50 ng/mL) are generally considered adequate for bone and overall health, according to the Institute of Medicine.[125] Serum vitamin D concentrations of 75-100 nmol/L (30-40 ng/mL) have been proposed as optimal for patients with MS.[126]

Achieving these levels may require the use of supplemental vitamin D in doses up to 3000 IU daily; maintaining these levels appears to require doses of 500 to 800 IU daily.[126] The safety and effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation among patients with MS remains unclear, however.[127]

Early treatment with immunomodulatory drugs has been associated with decreased disability progression and lower secondary relapse rates. Patients with MS must understand, however, that current immunomodulatory drugs are not curative.

The Uhthoff phenomenon is an exacerbation of MS symptoms that is induced by exercise, a hot meal, or a hot bath. The most notable symptoms seen with this phenomenon are transient visual obscurations, dyschromatopsia, and contrast sensitivity changes. The symptoms tend to resolve with restoration of euthermia, typically within 60 minutes to 24 hours. Sunlight by itself is not considered to be deleterious, but excessive exposure may mimic the effects of high temperatures.

On the other hand, the impact of stress on MS exacerbations is thought to be minimal or noncontributory. Likewise, trauma has no demonstrated impact on the disease course.

Previous
Next

Consultations

Patients with MS may require multiple consultations to rule out other causes of their symptoms. A significant number of MS patients will need a multidisciplinary approach to their care. For instance, patients with dysphonia may need an evaluation by an otolaryngologist (ie, ear, nose, and throat specialist) to rule out laryngeal lesions unrelated to MS. In addition, having MS does not exclude the possibility of concomitant peripheral neuropathy or other illnesses that may cause pain.

The following are the most common consultation services involved in referrals from an MS clinic:

  • Physical therapy and rehabilitation specialist
  • Speech therapist
  • Ophthalmologist
  • Urologist: Urologic consultation may be warranted to help in the assessment and treatment of incontinence
  • Gastroenterologist
  • Neuropsychologist: Neuropsychologic consultation is advisable so that a baseline assessment for future reference can be obtained; such consultation is especially important in patients with primary cognitive involvement
  • Psychiatrist
  • Otolaryngologist

It is not unusual for patients with more advanced MS to lose all family support, become separated from their spouse, lose the ability to walk, and require constant psychiatric and nursing assistance. These patients create a challenge for the physician who is not trained in handling the demanding administrative or ancillary aspects of medical care. A social worker specialist can be instrumental in helping to address these issues.

For the newer oral therapies with specific adverse effects, consultations with specialists may be warranted. Consultation with a cardiologist to evaluate the appropriateness of fingolimod in a patient with a history of nonrecent myocardial infarction, with an ophthalmologist to examine the appropriateness of fingolimod in patients with visual symptoms (to evaluate potential macular edema), or with a nephrologist for MS patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency (for consideration of treatment with dalfampridine or teriflunomide) may be required.

Previous
Next

Long-Term Monitoring

Recommended follow-up is yearly at minimum. Patients receiving therapy with certain agents (eg, natalizumab, fingolimod) require monitoring as often as every 3-4 months. Clinicians who also provide primary care for the patient with MS can perform routine health maintenance at these annual visits. For patients with worsening symptoms, a medical cause, such as infection, should be ruled out first before assuming that the patient is having an exacerbation.

Once a patient/provider relationship is established, a great deal of symptom management can be provided through careful telephone triage. More frequent visits, such as bimonthly or quarterly, may be necessary for patients with difficult symptoms, such as intractable spasticity, or for individuals whose social support system is not as stable as necessary.

Vaccination

MS specialists generally advise against the use of live-attenuated virus vaccines in patients with MS, particularly in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Despite concerns that vaccination may trigger the onset or relapses of MS, almost all killed-virus vaccines studied have been found safe in this regard.[42]

The Vaccine Safety Datalink Research Group of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that vaccination against hepatitis B, influenza, tetanus, measles, or rubella did not increase the risk of developing MS or optic neuritis.[128] The Vaccines in Multiple Sclerosis Study Group reported that vaccination for tetanus, hepatitis B, or influenza does not increase the short-term risk of relapses.[129]

Injectable influenza vaccine has been extensively studied in MS and found to be safe. However, the form of influenza vaccine that is delivered via a nasal spray (FluMist) is a live-virus vaccine and is not recommended for MS patients.

Varicella-zoster vaccine (Zostavax) is also a live-attenuated vaccine. However, in a patient with a definite history of chicken pox or a positive antibody test, this vaccine is likely to be safe and beneficial, although full discussion of the risks and benefits must precede its use. Discussion of risks and benefits is also important before a close family member of an MS patient receives this or any other live-virus vaccine.[42]

A study in 7 patients with relapsing-remitting MS who received yellow fever vaccine found a significantly increased risk of MS relapse during the 6 weeks following the vaccination. For MS patients who must travel to areas where yellow fever is endemic, these researchers advise careful weighing of the risk of relapse with the risk of contracting yellow fever, which is a potentially fatal illness.[130]

No studies have been published addressing the safety of the following vaccines in MS:

  • Pneumonia
  • Meningitis
  • Typhoid
  • Polio
  • Hepatitis A
  • Human papillomavirus (HPV)
  • Pertussis

There are rare reports of demyelination syndromes following administration of the HPV vaccine. Thus, physicians should thoroughly discuss the possible benefits and risks of this vaccine before administering it.[42]

Some special considerations for vaccination in MS patients from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society are as follows[42] :

  • In patients experiencing a serious relapse that affects their ability to carry out activities of daily living, defer vaccination until 4-6 weeks after the onset of the relapse
  • Vaccine response may be blunted in patients who have received immune globulin in the past 3 months or who are taking natalizumab or fingolimod.
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Christopher Luzzio, MD Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin at Madison School of Medicine and Public Health

Christopher Luzzio, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Fernando Dangond, MD, FAAN Head of US Medical Affairs, Neurodegenerative Diseases, EMD Serono, Inc

Fernando Dangond, MD, FAAN is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Medical Association

Disclosure: Received salary from EMD Serono, Inc. for employment.

Chief Editor

Jasvinder Chawla, MD, MBA Chief of Neurology, Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital; Professor of Neurology, Loyola University Medical Center

Jasvinder Chawla, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Clinical Neurophysiology Society, American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Martin K Childers, DO, PhD Professor, Department of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine; Professor, Rehabilitation Program, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Martin K Childers, DO, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, American Osteopathic Association, Christian Medical & Dental Society, and Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology

Disclosure: Allergan pharma Consulting fee Consulting

Edmond A Hooker II, MD, DrPH, FAAEM Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

Edmond A Hooker II, MD, DrPH, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American Public Health Association, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

J Stephen Huff, MD Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine and Neurology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine

J Stephen Huff, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Marjorie Lazoff, MD Editor-in-Chief, Medical Computing Review

Marjorie Lazoff, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Consuelo T Lorenzo, MD Physiatrist, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Alegent Health, Immanuel Rehabilitation Center

Consuelo T Lorenzo, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

William J Nowack, MD Associate Professor, Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center

William J Nowack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Clinical Neurophysiology Society, American Epilepsy Society, American Medical Electroencephalographic Association, American Medical Informatics Association, and Biomedical Engineering Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Richard Salcido, MD Chairman, Erdman Professor of Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Richard Salcido, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pain Medicine, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American College of Physician Executives, American Medical Association, and American Paraplegia Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Daniel D Scott, MD, MA Associate Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Attending Physician, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Eastern Colorado Health Care System

Daniel D Scott, MD, MA is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Paraplegia Society, Association of Academic Physiatrists, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, and Physiatric Association of Spine, Sports and Occupational Rehabilitation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Fu-Dong Shi, MD, PhD Director of Neuroimmunology Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Florian P Thomas, MD, MA, PhD, Drmed Director, Spinal Cord Injury Unit, St Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Director, National MS Society Multiple Sclerosis Center; Director, Neuropathy Association Center of Excellence, Professor, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Associate Professor, Institute for Molecular Virology, and Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, St Louis University School of Medicine

Florian P Thomas, MD, MA, PhD, Drmed is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Neurological Association, American Paraplegia Society, Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, and National Multiple Sclerosis Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Timothy Vollmer, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sandra F Williamson, MS, ANP-C, CRRN Clinic Coordinator, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Sandra F Williamson, MS, ANP-C, CRRN is a member of the following medical societies: Phi Beta Kappa, Phi Kappa Phi, and Sigma Theta Tau International

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria". Ann Neurol. 2005 Dec. 58(6):840-6. [Medline].

  2. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983 Mar. 13(3):227-31. [Medline].

  3. Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology. 1996 Apr. 46(4):907-11. [Medline].

  4. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001 Jul. 50(1):121-7. [Medline].

  5. Cortese I, Chaudhry V, So YT, Cantor F, Cornblath DR, Rae-Grant A. Evidence-based guideline update: Plasmapheresis in neurologic disorders: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2011 Jan 18. 76(3):294-300. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  6. Sanford M, Lyseng-Williamson KA. Subcutaneous recombinant interferon-ß-1a (Rebif®): a review of its use in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Drugs. 2011 Oct 1. 71(14):1865-91. [Medline].

  7. Betaseron [package insert]. Montville, NJ: Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. May 2010.

  8. Calabresi PA, Kieseier BC, Arnold DL, Balcer LJ, Boyko A, Pelletier J, et al. Pegylated interferon ß-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (ADVANCE): a randomised, phase 3, double-blind study. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jul. 13(7):657-65. [Medline].

  9. Copaxone [package insert] [package insert]. North Wales, PA: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA. February 2009.

  10. Pucci E, Giuliani G, Solari A, et al. Natalizumab for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5. CD007621. [Medline].

  11. Tysabri [package insert]. South San Francisco, CA: Biogen Idec Inc. 2011.

  12. Novantrone [package insert]. Rockland, MA: Serono, Inc. May 2012.

  13. Gilenya [package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis. September 2010.

  14. Aubagio (teriflunomide) [package insert]. Cambridge, MA: Genentech Corp. September, 2012. Available at [Full Text].

  15. Jeffrey S. FDA approves third oral agent for MS. March 27, 2013. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/781450. Accessed: April 2, 2013.

  16. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves new multiple sclerosis treatment: Tecfidera. March 27, 2013. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm345528.htm. Accessed: April 2, 2013.

  17. Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Bar-Or A, Giovannoni G, Selmaj K, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20. 367(12):1098-107. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  18. Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT, Hutchinson M, Havrdova E, Kita M, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20. 367(12):1087-97. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  19. Cohen JA, Coles AJ, Arnold DL, Confavreux C, Fox EJ, Hartung HP, et al. Alemtuzumab versus interferon beta 1a as first-line treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012 Nov 24. 380(9856):1819-28. [Medline].

  20. Coles AJ, Twyman CL, Arnold DL, Cohen JA, Confavreux C, Fox EJ, et al. Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012 Nov 24. 380(9856):1829-39. [Medline].

  21. Coles AJ, Fox E, Vladic A, Gazda SK, Brinar V, Selmaj KW, et al. Alemtuzumab more effective than interferon ß-1a at 5-year follow-up of CAMMS223 clinical trial. Neurology. 2012 Apr 3. 78(14):1069-78. [Medline].

  22. Jeffrey S. FDA Approves Interferon Autoinjector for MS. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/777065. Accessed: February 20, 2013.

  23. Windhagen A, Newcombe J, Dangond F, et al. Expression of costimulatory molecules B7-1 (CD80), B7-2 (CD86), and interleukin 12 cytokine in multiple sclerosis lesions. J Exp Med. 1995 Dec 1. 182(6):1985-96. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  24. Huan J, Culbertson N, Spencer L, et al. Decreased FOXP3 levels in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurosci Res. 2005 Jul 1. 81(1):45-52. [Medline].

  25. Tesmer LA, Lundy SK, Sarkar S, Fox DA. Th17 cells in human disease. Immunol Rev. 2008 Jun. 223:87-113. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  26. Minagar A, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, et al. Elevated plasma endothelial microparticles in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2001 May 22. 56(10):1319-24. [Medline].

  27. Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Verkman AS, Hinson SR. IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med. 2005 Aug 15. 202(4):473-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  28. Nielsen NM, Westergaard T, Rostgaard K, et al. Familial risk of multiple sclerosis: a nationwide cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Oct 15. 162(8):774-8. [Medline].

  29. Nischwitz S, Muller-Myhsok B, Weber F. Risk conferring genes in multiple sclerosis. FEBS Lett. 2011 Dec 1. 585(23):3789-97. [Medline].

  30. Yeo TW, De Jager PL, Gregory SG, et al. A second major histocompatibility complex susceptibility locus for multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2007 Mar. 61(3):228-36. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  31. Salvetti M, Giovannoni G, Aloisi F. Epstein-Barr virus and multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009 Jun. 22(3):201-6. [Medline].

  32. Kampman MT, Brustad M. Vitamin D: a candidate for the environmental effect in multiple sclerosis - observations from Norway. Neuroepidemiology. 2008. 30(3):140-6. [Medline].

  33. Munger KL, Levin LI, Hollis BW, Howard NS, Ascherio A. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of multiple sclerosis. JAMA. 2006 Dec 20. 296(23):2832-8. [Medline].

  34. Kampman MT, Brustad M. Vitamin D: a candidate for the environmental effect in multiple sclerosis - observations from Norway. Neuroepidemiology. 2008. 30(3):140-6. [Medline].

  35. Islam T, Gauderman WJ, Cozen W, Mack TM. Childhood sun exposure influences risk of multiple sclerosis in monozygotic twins. Neurology. 2007 Jul 24. 69(4):381-8. [Medline].

  36. Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009 Apr. 80(4):392-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  37. Zivadinov R, Schirda C, Dwyer MG, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and iron deposition on susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot case-control study. Int Angiol. 2010 Apr. 29(2):158-75. [Medline].

  38. Study To Evaluate Treating Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI) in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Available at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01089686. Accessed: 10/4/2010.

  39. Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, et al. A prospective open-label study of endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec. 50(6):1348-58.e1-3. [Medline].

  40. Laupacis A, Lillie E, Dueck A, et al. Association between chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2011 Nov 8. 183(16):E1203-12. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FAQs about Hepatitis B Vaccine (Hep B) and Multiple Sclerosis. [Full Text].

  42. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Vaccination. Available at http://www.nationalmssociety.org/living-with-multiple-sclerosis/healthy-living/vaccinations/index.aspx. Accessed: November 17, 2011.

  43. Noonan CW, Williamson DM, Henry JP, et al. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in 3 US communities. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jan. 7(1):A12. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  44. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Who Gets MS?. Available at http://www.nationalmssociety.org/about-multiple-sclerosis/what-we-know-about-ms/who-gets-ms/index.aspx. Accessed: 10/04/2010.

  45. Rosati G. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the world: an update. Neurol Sci. 2001 Apr. 22(2):117-39. [Medline].

  46. Aguirre-Cruz L, Flores-Rivera J, De La Cruz-Aguilera DL, Rangel-Lopez E, Corona T. Multiple sclerosis in Caucasians and Latino Americans. Autoimmunity. 2011 Nov. 44(7):571-5. [Medline].

  47. Matsuda PN, Shumway-Cook A, Bamer AM, Johnson SL, Amtmann D, Kraft GH. Falls in multiple sclerosis. PM R. 2011 Jul. 3(7):624-32; quiz 632. [Medline].

  48. Roodhooft JM. Ocular problems in early stages of multiple sclerosis. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2009. 65-8. [Medline].

  49. Braley TJ, Chervin RD. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: mechanisms, evaluation, and treatment. Sleep. 2010 Aug. 33(8):1061-7. [Medline].

  50. Optic Neuritis Study Group. The clinical profile of optic neuritis. Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Optic Neuritis Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Dec. 109(12):1673-8. [Medline].

  51. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983 Nov. 33(11):1444-52. [Medline].

  52. Lonergan R, Kinsella K, Duggan M, Jordan S, Hutchinson M, Tubridy N. Discontinuing disease-modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: can we stop what we have started?. Mult Scler. 2009 Dec. 15(12):1528-31. [Medline].

  53. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb. 69(2):292-302. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  54. Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mörk S, Bö L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 29. 338(5):278-85. [Medline].

  55. Prashanth LK, Taly AB, Sinha S, Arunodaya GR, Swamy HS. Wilson's disease: diagnostic errors and clinical implications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jun. 75(6):907-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  56. Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH, et al. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1997 Nov. 120 ( Pt 11):2059-69. [Medline].

  57. Bonhomme GR, Waldman AT, Balcer LJ, et al. Pediatric optic neuritis: brain MRI abnormalities and risk of multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2009 Mar 10. 72(10):881-5. [Medline].

  58. Filippi M. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2000 Oct. 6(5):320-6. [Medline].

  59. Filippi M, Bozzali M, Horsfield MA, et al. A conventional and magnetization transfer MRI study of the cervical cord in patients with MS. Neurology. 2000 Jan 11. 54(1):207-13. [Medline].

  60. Filippi M, Yousry TA, Alkadhi H, Stehling M, Horsfield MA, Voltz R. Spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis with multicoil arrays: a comparison between fast spin echo and fast FLAIR. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Dec. 61(6):632-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  61. Grossman RI, Barkhof F, Filippi M. Assessment of spinal cord damage in MS using MRI. J Neurol Sci. 2000 Jan 15. 172 Suppl 1:S36-9. [Medline].

  62. Neema M, Goldberg-Zimring D, Guss ZD, et al. 3 T MRI relaxometry detects T2 prolongation in the cerebral normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 1. 46(3):633-41. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  63. Poonawalla AH, Hou P, Nelson FA, Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA. Cervical Spinal Cord Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: T1-weighted Inversion-Recovery MR Imaging with Phase-Sensitive Reconstruction. Radiology. 2008 Jan. 246(1):258-264. [Medline].

  64. Stankiewicz JM, Glanz BI, Healy BC, et al. Brain MRI lesion load at 1.5T and 3T versus clinical status in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging. 2011 Apr. 21(2):e50-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  65. Vaneckova M, Seidl Z, Krasensky J, et al. Patients' stratification and correlation of brain magnetic resonance imaging parameters with disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol. 2009. 61(5):278-84. [Medline].

  66. Wattjes MP, Barkhof F. High field MRI in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: high field-high yield?. Neuroradiology. 2009 May. 51(5):279-92. [Medline].

  67. [Guideline] Traboulsee, A. et al. Revised Recommendations of the CMSC Task Force for a Standardized MRI Protocol and Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Follow-up of Multiple Sclerosis. Consortim of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. Available at http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.mscare.org/resource/collection/9C5F19B9-3489-48B0-A54B-623A1ECEE07B/MRIprotocol2015.pdf. Accessed: August 13, 2015.

  68. Agosta F, Absinta M, Sormani MP, et al. In vivo assessment of cervical cord damage in MS patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study. Brain. 2007 Aug. 130:2211-9. [Medline].

  69. Fazekas F, Offenbacher H, Fuchs S, et al. Criteria for an increased specificity of MRI interpretation in elderly subjects with suspected multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1988 Dec. 38(12):1822-5. [Medline].

  70. Colorado RA, Shukla K, Zhou Y, Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA. Multi-task functional MRI in multiple sclerosis patients without clinical disability. Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2. 59(1):573-81. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  71. Wang J, Xiao Y, Luo M, Zhang X, Luo H. Statins for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8. CD008386. [Medline].

  72. Arnold DL, Matthews PM, Francis G, Antel J. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human brain in vivo in the evaluation of multiple sclerosis: assessment of the load of disease. Magn Reson Med. 1990 Apr. 14(1):154-9. [Medline].

  73. Henning A, Schar M, Kollias SS, Boesiger P, Dydak U. Quantitative magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the entire human cervical spinal cord and beyond at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2008 Jun. 59(6):1250-8. [Medline].

  74. Marliani AF, Clementi V, Albini-Riccioli L, Agati R, Leonardi M. Quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the human cervical spinal cord at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Jan. 57(1):160-3. [Medline].

  75. Berg D, Maurer M, Warmuth-Metz M, Rieckmann P, Becker G. The correlation between ventricular diameter measured by transcranial sonography and clinical disability and cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2000 Sep. 57(9):1289-92. [Medline].

  76. Walter U, Wagner S, Horowski S, Benecke R, Zettl UK. Transcranial brain sonography findings predict disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2009 Sep 29. 73(13):1010-7. [Medline].

  77. Vazquez-Marrufo M, Gonzalez-Rosa JJ, Vaquero E, et al. Quantitative electroencephalography reveals different physiological profiles between benign and remitting-relapsing multiple sclerosis patients. BMC Neurol. 2008 Nov 24. 8:44. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  78. Jeffrey S. TOPIC: Teriflunomide Delays Clinically Definite MS. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/803177. Accessed: May 8, 2013.

  79. Rodriguez M, Karnes WE, Bartleson JD, Pineda AA. Plasmapheresis in acute episodes of fulminant CNS inflammatory demyelination. Neurology. 1993 Jun. 43(6):1100-4. [Medline].

  80. Spelman T, Mekhael L, Burke T, Butzkueven H, Hodgkinson S, Havrdova E, et al. Risk of early relapse following the switch from injectables to oral agents for multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2016 Jan 19. [Medline].

  81. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology. 1993 Apr. 43(4):655-61. [Medline].

  82. Jacobs LD, Cookfair DL, Rudick RA, et al. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. The Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (MSCRG). Ann Neurol. 1996 Mar. 39(3):285-94. [Medline].

  83. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group. Lancet. 1998 Nov 7. 352(9139):1498-504. [Medline].

  84. Panitch H, Goodin DS, Francis G, et al. Randomized, comparative study of interferon beta-1a treatment regimens in MS: The EVIDENCE Trial. Neurology. 2002 Nov 26. 59(10):1496-506. [Medline].

  85. Schwid SR, Panitch HS. Full results of the Evidence of Interferon Dose-Response-European North American Comparative Efficacy (EVIDENCE) study: a multicenter, randomized, assessor-blinded comparison of low-dose weekly versus high-dose, high-frequency interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2007 Sep. 29(9):2031-48. [Medline].

  86. Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Cohen JA, Ford CC, Goldstein J, Lisak RP, et al. Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. The Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology. 1995 Jul. 45(7):1268-76. [Medline].

  87. Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Ford CC, et al. Sustained clinical benefits of glatiramer acetate in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients observed for 6 years. Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Mult Scler. 2000 Aug. 6(4):255-66. [Medline].

  88. Khan O, Rieckmann P, Boyko A, Selmaj K, Zivadinov R. Three times weekly glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2013 Jun. 73(6):705-13. [Medline].

  89. Polman CH, O'Connor PW, Havrdova E, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 2. 354(9):899-910. [Medline].

  90. Cadavid D, Jurgensen S, Lee S. Impact of natalizumab on ambulatory improvement in secondary progressive and disabled relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2013. 8(1):e53297. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  91. Chun J, Brinkmann V. A mechanistically novel, first oral therapy for multiple sclerosis: the development of fingolimod (FTY720, Gilenya). Discov Med. 2011 Sep. 12(64):213-28. [Medline].

  92. Hughes S. Shorter washout reduces MS relapse switching off natalizumab. Medscape Medical News. October 7, 2013. [Full Text].

  93. Hughes S. Shorter Washout Better for Natalizumab-to-Fingolimod Switch. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/822567. Accessed: April 1, 2014.

  94. Cohen M, Maillart E, Tourbah A, De Sèze J, Vukusic S, Brassat D, et al. Switching From Natalizumab to Fingolimod in Multiple Sclerosis: A French Prospective Study. JAMA Neurol. 2014 Feb 24. [Medline].

  95. O'Connor P, Wolinsky JS, Confavreux C, et al. Randomized trial of oral teriflunomide for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6. 365(14):1293-303. [Medline].

  96. Semedo, D. Aubagio (Teriflunomide) Slows Brain Atrophy in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis News Today. Available at http://multiplesclerosisnewstoday.com/2015/10/08/aubagio-teriflunomide-slows-brain-atrophy-patients-relapsing-multiple-sclerosis/. October 8, 2015; Accessed: October 14, 2015.

  97. A study comparing the effectiveness and safety of teriflunomide and interferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (TENERE). 4th Cooperative Meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC)/Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS). June 2, 2012 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00883337).

  98. A multicenter double-blind parallel-group placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis who are treated with interferon-beta. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01252355).

  99. Fox EJ, Sullivan HC, Gazda SK, et al. A single-arm, open-label study of alemtuzumab in treatment-refractory patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2012 Feb. 19(2):307-11. [Medline].

  100. Anderson P. Alemtuzumab Benefits Hard-to-Treat MS Patients. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/805173. Accessed: June 12, 2013.

  101. Harrison DM, Gladstone DE, Hammond E, et al. Treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with high-dose cyclophosphamide induction followed by glatiramer acetate maintenance. Mult Scler. 2012 Feb. 18(2):202-9. [Medline].

  102. Rojas JI, Romano M, Ciapponi A, Patrucco L, Cristiano E. Interferon beta for primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21. CD006643. [Medline].

  103. Goodkin DE, Rudick RA, VanderBrug Medendorp S, et al. Low-dose (7.5 mg) oral methotrexate reduces the rate of progression in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1995 Jan. 37(1):30-40. [Medline].

  104. Kappos L, Radue EW, O'Connor P, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4. 362(5):387-401. [Medline].

  105. Cohen JA, Barkhof F, Comi G, et al. Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4. 362(5):402-15. [Medline].

  106. Khatri B, Barkhof F, Comi G, et al. Comparison of fingolimod with interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomised extension of the TRANSFORMS study. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jun. 10(6):520-9. [Medline].

  107. Killestein J, Rudick RA, Polman CH. Oral treatment for multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Nov. 10(11):1026-34. [Medline].

  108. Multiple Sclerosis Association of America (MSAA). MS Research Update. Available at http://mymsaa.org/PDFs/MSAA_Research_Update_2013.pdf. Accessed: March 27, 2013.

  109. Bielekova B, Richert N, Herman ML, et al. Intrathecal effects of daclizumab treatment of multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2011 Nov 22. 77(21):1877-86. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  110. Kappos L, Li D, Calabresi PA, et al. Ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Nov 19. 378(9805):1779-87. [Medline].

  111. Anderson P. Myelin peptide skin patch safe, reduces MS activity. Medscape Medical News. July 29, 2013. [Full Text].

  112. Walczak A, Siger M, Ciach A, Szczepanik M, Selmaj K. Transdermal application of myelin peptides in multiple sclerosis treatment. JAMA Neurol. 2013 Jul 1. 1-6. [Medline].

  113. Confavreux C, Hutchinson M, Hours MM, Cortinovis-Tourniaire P, Moreau T. Rate of pregnancy-related relapse in multiple sclerosis. Pregnancy in Multiple Sclerosis Group. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 30. 339(5):285-91. [Medline].

  114. Tsui A, Lee MA. Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec. 23(6):435-9. [Medline].

  115. Krupp LB, Christodoulou C, Melville P, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial of donepezil for memory impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2011 Apr 26. 76(17):1500-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  116. Attarian HP, Brown KM, Duntley SP, Carter JD, Cross AH. The relationship of sleep disturbances and fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2004 Apr. 61(4):525-8. [Medline].

  117. MacAllister WS, Krupp LB. Multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005 May. 16(2):483-502. [Medline].

  118. Solaro C, Uccelli MM. Management of pain in multiple sclerosis: a pharmacological approach. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011 Aug 16. 7(9):519-27. [Medline].

  119. Goodman AD, Brown TR, Krupp LB, et al. Sustained-release oral fampridine in multiple sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 Feb 28. 373(9665):732-8. [Medline].

  120. Ampyra [package insert]. Hawthorne, NY: Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. 2010.

  121. Nicholas RS, Friede T, Hollis S, Young CA. Anticholinergics for urinary symptoms in multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21. CD004193. [Medline].

  122. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves Botox to treat specific form of urinary incontinence. August 25, 2011. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm269509.htm. Accessed: November 28, 2011.

  123. Beck RW, Cleary PA, Anderson MM Jr, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. The Optic Neuritis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 27. 326(9):581-8. [Medline].

  124. Myhr KM. Vitamin D treatment in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2009 Nov 15. 286(1-2):104-8. [Medline].

  125. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. November 30, 2010. Available at http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/Dietary-Reference-Intakes-for-Calcium-and-Vitamin-D.aspx. Accessed: December 29, 2011.

  126. Summerday NM, Brown SJ, Allington DR, Rivey MP. Vitamin D and multiple sclerosis: review of a possible association. J Pharm Pract. 2012 Feb. 25(1):75-84. [Medline].

  127. Jagannath VA, Fedorowicz Z, Asokan GV, Robak EW, Whamond L. Vitamin D for the management of multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8. CD008422. [Medline].

  128. DeStefano F, Verstraeten T, Jackson LA, et al. Vaccinations and risk of central nervous system demyelinating diseases in adults. Arch Neurol. 2003 Apr. 60(4):504-9. [Medline].

  129. Confavreux C, Suissa S, Saddier P, Bourdès V, Vukusic S. Vaccinations and the risk of relapse in multiple sclerosis. Vaccines in Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 1. 344(5):319-26. [Medline].

  130. Farez MF, Correale J. Yellow fever vaccination and increased relapse rate in travelers with multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2011 Oct. 68(10):1267-71. [Medline].

  131. Azasan [package insert] [package insert]. Wilmington, NC: Salix pharmaceuticals Inc. August 2011.

  132. Cyclophosphamide [package insert]. Deerfield, IL: Baxter Healthcare Corporation. June 2004.

  133. Brooks M. New AAN guideline on psychiatric disorders in MS. Medscape Medical News. January 3, 2014. [Full Text].

  134. Hughes S. New Test to Identify PML Risk With Natalizumab in MS. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/832504. Accessed: October 7, 2014.

  135. Jeffrey S. No Cognitive Disadvantage in Pediatric- vs Adult-Onset MS. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/831536. Accessed: September 15, 2014.

  136. Keller DM. Fingolimod Reduces Annual Brain Volume Loss in MS. Medscape Medical News. Jun 6 2014. [Full Text].

  137. Minden SL, Feinstein A, Kalb RC, Miller D, Mohr DC, Patten SB, et al. Evidence-based guideline: Assessment and management of psychiatric disorders in individuals with MS: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2013 Dec 27. [Medline].

  138. Rovira À, Wattjes MP, Tintoré M, Tur C, Yousry TA, Sormani MP, et al. Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis-clinical implementation in the diagnostic process. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Aug. 11 (8):471-82. [Medline].

  139. [Guideline] Multiple Sclerosis Coalition. The Use of Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Principles and Current Evidence: A Consensus Paper. The Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. Available at http://www.mscare.org/?page=dmt. July 2014;

  140. [Guideline] Filippi M, Rocca A, Arnold DL, Bakshi R, Barkhof F, De Stefano N, et al. Use of Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis. Gilhus NE, Barnes MP, Brainin M. European Handbook of Neurological Management. 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. Vol 1: 35-51.

  141. Wattjes MP, Rovira À, Miller D, Yousry TA, Sormani MP, de Stefano MP, et al. Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis--establishing disease prognosis and monitoring patients. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Oct. 11 (10):597-606. [Medline].

  142. Kappos L, Wiendl H, Selmaj K, Arnold DL, Havrdova E, Boyko A, et al. Daclizumab HYP versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8. 373 (15):1418-28. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  143. Gold R, Giovannoni G, Selmaj K, Havrdova E, Montalban X, Radue EW, et al. Daclizumab high-yield process in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (SELECT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 Jun 22. 381 (9884):2167-75. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
The mechanism of demyelination in multiple sclerosis may be activation of myelin-reactive T cells in the periphery, which then express adhesion molecules, allowing their entry through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). T cells are activated following antigen presentation by antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages and microglia, or B cells. Perivascular T cells can secrete proinflammatory cytokines, including interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Antibodies against myelin also may be generated in the periphery or intrathecally. Ongoing inflammation leads to epitope spread and recruitment of other inflammatory cells (ie, bystander activation). The T cell receptor recognizes antigen in the context of human leukocyte antigen molecule presentation and also requires a second event (ie, co-stimulatory signal via the B7-CD28 pathway, not shown) for T cell activation to occur. Activated microglia may release free radicals, nitric oxide, and proteases that may contribute to tissue damage.
MRI of the head of a 35-year-old man with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. MRI reveals multiple lesions with high T2 signal intensity and one large white matter lesion. These demyelinating lesions may sometimes mimic brain tumors because of the associated edema and inflammation.
MRI of the head of a 35-year-old man with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. This MRI, performed 3 months after the one in the related image, shows a dramatic decrease in the size of lesions.
Inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain shows perivascular infiltration of inflammatory cells. These infiltrates are composed of activated T cells, B cells, and macrophages.
Demyelination in multiple sclerosis. Luxol fast blue (LFB)/periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain confers an intense blue to myelin. Loss of myelin is demonstrated in this chronic plaque. Note that absence of inflammation may be demonstrated at the edge of chronic lesions.
Gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted image showing enhancement of the left optic nerve (arrow).
Corresponding axial images of the spinal cord showing enhancing plaque (arrow). The combination of optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions constitutes Devic neuromyelitis optica.
Table 1. 2010 Revised McDonald Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis [53]
Clinical Presentation Additional Data Needed for MS Diagnosis
  • Two or more attacks
  • Objective clinical evidence of 2 or more lesions with reasonable historical evidence of a prior attack
None; clinical evidence will suffice. Additional evidence (eg, brain MRI) desirable,



but must be consistent with MS



  • Two or more attacks
  • Objective clinical evidence of 1 lesion
Dissemination in space demonstrated by MRI or



Await further clinical attack implicating a different site



  • One attack
  • Objective clinical evidence of 2 or more lesions
Dissemination in time demonstrated by



MRI or second clinical attack



  • One attack
  • Objective clinical evidence of 1 lesion (clinically isolated syndrome)
Dissemination in space demonstrated by



MRI or await a second clinical attack implicating a different CNS site



and



Dissemination in time, demonstrated by MRI or second clinical attack



· Insidious neurologic progression suggestive of MS One year of disease progression and dissemination in space, demonstrated by 2 of the following:
  • One or more T2 lesions in brain, in regions characteristic of MS
  • Two or more T2 focal lesions in spinal cord
  • Positive CSF
Notes: An attack is defined as a neurologic disturbance of the kind seen in MS. It can be documented by subjective report or by objective observation, but it must last for at least 24 hours. Pseudoattacks and single paroxysmal episodes must be excluded. To be considered separate attacks, at least 30 days must elapse between onset of one event and onset of another event.
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.