Cauda Equina and Conus Medullaris Syndromes
- Author: Segun Toyin Dawodu, JD, MD, MS, MBA, LLM, FAAPMR, FAANEM; Chief Editor: Nicholas Lorenzo, MD, MHA, CPE more...
The spinal cord tapers and ends at the level between the first and second lumbar vertebrae in an average adult. The most distal bulbous part of the spinal cord is called the conus medullaris, and its tapering end continues as the filum terminale. Distal to this end of the spinal cord is a collection of nerve roots, which are horsetail-like in appearance and hence called the cauda equina (Latin for horse's tail). (See the image of cauda equina anatomy below.)
See Back Pain: Find the Cause, Watch for the Comeback, a Critical Images slideshow, to help diagnose and manage this common problem.
These nerve roots constitute the anatomic connection between the central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral nervous system (PNS). They are arranged anatomically according to the spinal segments from which they originated and are within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the subarachnoid space with the dural sac ending at the level of second sacral vertebra.
Cauda equina syndrome refers to a characteristic pattern of neuromuscular and urogenital symptoms resulting from the simultaneous compression of multiple lumbosacral nerve roots below the level of the conus medullaris (see the image below). These symptoms include low back pain, sciatica (unilateral or, usually, bilateral), saddle sensory disturbances, bladder and bowel dysfunction, and variable lower extremity motor and sensory loss (see Clinical).
Although the lesion is technically involves nerve roots and represents a "peripheral" nerve injury, damage may be irreversible and cauda equina syndrome may be a surgical emergency (see Treatment).
Lesions involving the termination of the spinal cord (conus medullaris) are not discussed in this article. Please see the article Spinal Cord Injuries.
The spinal cord, which is the downward continuation of medulla that starts just below the foramen magnum, serves as a conduit for the ascending and descending fiber tracts that connect the peripheral and spinal nerves to the brain. The cord projects 31 pairs of spinal nerves on either side (8 cervical, 12 thoracic, 5 lumbar, 5 sacral, 1 coccygeal) that are connected to the peripheral nerves.
A cross-section of the spinal cord reveals butterfly-shaped gray matter in the middle, surrounded by white matter. As in the cerebrum, the gray matter is composed of cell bodies. The white matter consists of various ascending and descending tracts of myelinated axon fibers, each with specific functions.
During development, the vertebral column grows more rapidly than the spinal cord. Spinal nerves exit the vertebral column at progressively more oblique angles because of the increasing distance between the spinal cord segments and the corresponding vertebrae. Lumbar and sacral nerves travel nearly vertically down the spinal canal to reach their exiting foramen.
The spinal cord ends at the intervertebral disc between the first and second lumbar vertebrae as a tapered structure called the conus medullaris, consisting of sacral spinal cord segments. The upper border of the conus medullaris is often not well defined. The fibrous extension of the cord, the filum terminale, is a nonneural element that extends down to the coccyx.
The cauda equina (CE) is a bundle of intradural nerve roots at the end of the spinal cord, in the subarachnoid space distal to the conus medullaris. Cauda is Latin for tail, and equina is Latin for horse (ie, the "horse's tail"). The CE provides sensory innervation to the saddle area, motor innervation to the sphincters, and parasympathetic innervation to the bladder and lower bowel (ie, from the left splenic flexure to the rectum).
The nerves in the CE region include lower lumbar and all of the sacral nerve roots. The pelvic splanchnic nerves carry preganglionic parasympathetic fibers from S2-S4 to innervate the detrusor muscle of the urinary bladder. Conversely, somatic lower motor neurons from S2-S4 innervate the voluntary muscles of the external anal sphincter and the urethral sphincter via the inferior rectal and the perineal branches of the pudendal nerve, respectively.
Hence, the nerve roots in the CE region carry sensations from the lower extremities, perineal dermatomes, and outgoing motor fibers to the lower extremity myotomes.
The conus medullaris obtains its blood supply primarily from 3 spinal arterial vessels: the anterior median longitudinal arterial trunk and 2 posterolateral trunks. Less prominent sources of blood supply include radicular arterial branches from the aorta, lateral sacral arteries, and the fifth lumbar, iliolumbar, and middle sacral arteries. The latter contribute more to the vascular supply of the cauda equina, although not in a segmental fashion, unlike the blood supply to the peripheral nerves.
The nerve roots may also be supplied by diffusion from the surrounding CSF. Moreover, a proximal area of the nerve roots may have a zone of relative hypovascularity.
In understanding the pathological basis of any disease involving the conus medullaris, keep in mind that this structure constitutes part of the spinal cord (the distal part of the cord) and is in proximity to the nerve roots. Thus, injuries to this area often yield a combination of upper motor neuron (UMN) and lower motor neuron (LMN) symptoms and signs in the dermatomes and myotomes of the affected segments. On the other hand, a cauda equina lesion is an LMN lesion because the nerve roots are part of the PNS.
Cauda equina syndrome may result from any lesion that compresses CE nerve roots. These nerve roots are particularly susceptible to injury, since they have a poorly developed epineurium. A well-developed epineurium, as peripheral nerves have, protects against compressive and tensile stresses.
The microvascular systems of nerve roots have a region of relative hypovascularity in their proximal third. Increased vascular permeability and subsequent diffusion from the surrounding cerebral spinal fluid supplement the nutritional supply. This property of increased permeability may be related to the tendency toward edema formation of the nerve roots, which may result in edema compounding initial and sometimes seemingly slight injury.
Several studies in different animal models have assessed the pathophysiology of cauda equina syndrome.[3, 4] Olmarker et al, using a graded balloon pressure method in a porcine model, reported that the venules in the CE region begin to compress at a pressure as low as 5 mm Hg and the arterioles begin to occlude as the balloon pressure surpasses the mean arterial pressure.[5, 6, 7, 3, 8] Despite this, even a pressure as high as 200 mm Hg failed to completely shut off nutritional supply to the CE.
These studies showed that not only the magnitude but also the length and the speed of obstruction were also important in damaging the CE region. Similar results were reported in other studies. Takahashi et al reported a reduction in blood flow to the intermediate nerve segment when 2 pressure points were applied along the path of the nerve in the CE.
Others have studied compound action potentials in afferent and efferent segments of nerves in the CE region after application of balloon compression.[11, 12, 13] These researchers reported that 0-50 mm Hg of pressure did not affect the action potentials (the threshold for disturbances in action potentials was 50-75 mm Hg), and significant deficits were observed when pressure rose to 100-200 mm Hg.
Cauda equina syndrome is caused by any narrowing of the spinal canal that compresses the nerve roots below the level of the spinal cord. Numerous causes of cauda equina syndrome have been reported, including disc herniation, intradural disc rupture, spinal stenosis secondary to other spinal conditions, traumatic injury, primary tumors such as ependymomas and schwannomas, metastatic tumors, infectious conditions, arteriovenous malformation or hemorrhage, and iatrogenic injury.[14, 15]
The most common causes of cauda equina and conus medullaris syndromes are the following:
Lumbar stenosis (multilevel)
Spinal trauma including fractures 
Herniated nucleus pulposus (cause of 2-6% of cases of cauda equina syndrome) [17, 18, 19]
Neoplasm, including metastases, astrocytoma, neurofibroma, and meningioma; 20% of all spinal tumors affect this area
Spinal infection/abscess (eg, tuberculosis, herpes simplex virus, meningitis, meningovascular syphilis, cytomegalovirus, schistosomiasis) 
Idiopathic (eg, spinal anesthesia  ): these syndromes may occur as complications of the procedure or of the anesthetic agent (eg, hyperbaric lidocaine, tetracaine)
Spina bifida and subsequent tethered cord syndrome 
Other, rare causes include the following:
Spinal hemorrhage, especially subdural and epidural hemorrhage causing compression within the spinal canal
Congenital anomalies of the spine/filum terminale, including tethered cord syndrome
Conus medullaris lipomas
Spinal arteriovenous malformations
Late-stage ankylosing spondylitis
Deep venous thrombosis of the spinal veins (propagated)
Inferior vena cava thrombosis 
A retrospective study of 66 consecutive cases of patients admitted to a neurosurgical unit with suspected cauda equina syndrome found that almost half had no evidence of structural pathology on MRI. These researchers suggested that the symptoms have a functional origin in such cases.
Traumatic events leading to fracture or subluxation can lead to compression of the cauda equina.[16, 25, 26, 27, 28] Penetrating trauma can cause damage or compression of the cauda equina. Spinal manipulation resulting in subluxation has caused cauda equina syndrome. Rare cases of sacral insufficiency fractures have been reported to cause cauda equina syndrome. Acute and delayed presentations of CES due to hematomas and posttraumatic arachnoid cysts have also been reported.[31, 32, 33]
The reported incidence of cauda equina syndrome resulting from herniated lumbar disk (see the image below) varies from 1-15%.[34, 35, 19] Ninety percent of lumbar disk herniations occur either at L4-L5 or L5-S1.[36, 37]
Of cases of herniated disks leading to cauda equina syndrome, 70% occur in patients with a history of chronic low back pain; in 30%, cauda equina syndrome is the first symptom of lumbar disk herniation. Men in the fourth and fifth decades of life are most prone to cauda equina syndrome secondary to disk herniation.
Most cases of cauda equina syndrome secondary to disk herniation involve either a large central disc or an extruded disc fragment that compromises a significant amount of the spinal canal diameter. The presentation may be acute or that of a more protracted course, with the latter bearing a better prognosis. Individuals with congenital stenosis who sustain a disk herniation are more likely to develop cauda equina syndrome because even a small herniation can drastically limit the space available for the nerve roots.
Rare cases of intradural disk herniations have been reported to cause cauda equina syndrome. Myelography in these instances typically demonstrates a complete block of the contrast material. If an intradural disc fragment is identified, transdural removal of the extruded disc fragment may be helpful to prevent further stretching of the already compromised nerve root.
Narrowing of the spinal canal can be due to a developmental abnormality or degenerative process. Although unusual, cauda equina syndrome from spinal stenosis secondary to spinal disorders such as ankylosing spondylitis, spondylosis, and spondylolisthesis have all been reported.[41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47]
Cauda equina syndrome can be caused by primary or metastatic spinal neoplasms. Among the primary tumors able to cause CES include myxopapillary ependymoma, schwannoma, and paraganglioma.
Myxopapillary ependymoma is the most common tumor of the filum. Recovery of the function after surgery depends on the duration of symptoms and the presence or absence of sphincter dysfunction Paraganglioma of the filum, when present, needs to be differentiated from other tumors of this region. Although rare, this entity may present as CES.
Schwannomas are benign encapsulated neoplasms that are structurally identical to a syncytium of Schwann cells. These growths may arise from peripheral or sympathetic nerves. Schwannomas, whether solitary or as a part of a syndrome, may cause CES if present at the level of the conus or filum terminale. Primary tumors that affect the sacrum, such as chordoma and giant cell tumor of the bone, may produce similar symptoms as a result of bony destruction and collapse.
Ependymomas are gliomas derived from relatively undifferentiated ependymal cells. They often originate from the central canal of the spinal cord and tend to be arranged radially around blood vessels. Ependymomas are found most commonly in patients aged approximately 35 years. They can lead to increased intracranial pressure (ICP), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has an increased protein level.
Metastatic lesions of the spine are being reported with increasing frequency because of earlier diagnosis, better imaging, and more effective treatment modalities. Although metastasis accounts for most tumors in the spine in general, metastatic tumors in the cauda equina are relatively rare compared with primary tumors.
For the spine in general, sources of spinal metastases are as follows :
Lung cancer (40-85%)
Breast cancer (11%)
Renal cell carcinoma (4%)
Lymphatic cancer (3%)
Colorectal cancer (3%)
Although lung cancer is the most common source of spine metastases, in one study, only 0.7% of the lung cancer metastases to the spine produced cauda equina syndrome; most of the metastatic lesions were not at the level of the cauda equina. Up to 8% of patients with prostate cancer experience malignant spinal cord compression; however, the percentage of cases involving cauda equina syndrome is unknown.
The CE region is also a favored site for drop metastases from intracranial ependymoma, germinoma, and other tumors. Other unusual metastatic spread from genitourinary and gynecologic cancer have also been reported at the conus region, causing neurological compromise.[55, 56]
Inflammatory and infectious conditions
Long-lasting inflammatory conditions of the spine, including Paget disease and ankylosing spondylitis, can lead to cauda equina syndrome secondary to spinal stenosis or fracture.
Infectious conditions, including epidural abscess, can lead to deformity of the nerve roots and spinal cord. Symptoms generally include severe back pain and a rapidly progressing motor weakness.
Infectious causes for cauda equina syndrome may be pyogenic or nonpyogenic. Pyogenic abscesses are generally found in an immunocompromised or poorly nourished host. Staphylococcus aureus causes epidural abscesses in 25-60% of cases, but, recently, an increasing incidence of infections with methicillin-resistant S aureus, Pseudomonas species, and Escherichia coli have been recorded. A high index of suspicion is helpful in correct diagnosis and management.
Nonpyogenic causes for abscess are rare and include tuberculosis. Resurgence of tuberculosis secondary to immunocompromise in individuals with HIV infection requires a high index of suspicion, as the development of cauda equina syndrome may follow an indolent course. Other uncommon organisms, such as Nocardia asteroides and Streptococcus milleri, have also been reported as a cause of abscess that leads to the development of CES.[59, 60]
Complications of spinal instrumentation have been reported to cause cases of cauda equina syndrome, including misplaced pedicle screws and laminar hooks.[62, 63] Continuous spinal anesthesia also has been linked to cases of cauda equina syndrome.
Several cases have involved the use of hyperbaric 5% lidocaine for spinal anesthesia. Recommendations are that hyperbaric lidocaine not be administered in concentrations greater than 2%, with a total dose not to exceed 60 mg.[67, 68]
Medical and surgical situations such as bone screw fixation, fat grafts, lumbar arthrodesis for spondylolisthesis, lumbar discectomy, intradiscal therapy, lumbar puncture forming an epidural hematoma, chiropractic manipulation, and a bolus injection of anesthetic during spinal anesthesia have been related to the development of cauda equina syndrome–like syndromes.[35, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73]
Cauda equina and conus medullaris syndromes are classified as clinical syndromes of the spinal cord; epidemiological data on the 2 syndromes are often not available separately from the general data on spinal cord injury.
Cauda equina syndrome is uncommon, both atraumatically as well as traumatically. It is often reported as a case report due to its rarity. Although infrequent, it is a diagnosis that must be considered in patients who complain of low back pain coupled with neurologic complaints, especially urinary symptoms.
Age-related differences in incidence
Traumatic cauda equina syndrome is not age specific. Atraumatic cauda equina syndrome occurs primarily in adults as a result of surgical morbidity, spinal disk disease, metastatic cancer, or epidural abscess.
Morbidity and especially mortality rates are determined by the underlying etiology. Multiple conditions can result in cauda equina or conus medullaris syndrome. The prognosis improves if a definitive cause is identified and appropriate treatment occurs early in the course. Surgical decompression may be performed emergently, or, in some patients, delayed, depending on the etiology. Residual weakness, incontinence, impotence, and/or sensory abnormalities are potential problems if therapy is delayed.
Investigators have attempted to identify specific criteria that can aid in predicting the prognosis of patients with cauda equina syndrome. Patients with bilateral sciatica have been reported to have a less favorable prognosis than patients with unilateral pain. Patients with complete perineal anesthesia are more likely to have permanent paralysis of the bladder.
The extent of perineal or saddle sensory deficit has been reported to be the most important predictor of recovery. Patients with unilateral deficits have a better prognosis than patients with bilateral deficits. Females and patients with bowel dysfunction have been reported to have worse outcomes postoperatively.
Prognosis can be predicted with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale (see Physical Examination ), as follows:
ASIA A: 90% of patients remain incapable of functional ambulation (reciprocal gait of 200 feet or more)
ASIA B: 72% of patients are unable to attain functional ambulation
ASIA C/D: 13% are unable to attain functional ambulation 1 year after injury
Ambulatory motor index also is used to predict ambulatory capability. It is calculated by scoring hip flexion, hip abduction, hip extension, knee extension, and knee flexion on both sides, using a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=trace/poor, 2=fair, 3=good or normal); the score is expressed as a percentage of the maximum score of 30. Prognostic significance is as follows:
A patient with a score of 60% or more has a good chance for community ambulation with no more than one knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO)
A patient with a score of 79% or higher may not need an orthosis
A patient with a score of 40% or less may require 2 KAFOs for community ambulation
Patient education needs will vary with the type and severity of persistent deficits, and may include the following:
Training in self-catheterization and finger fecal disimpaction, if required
Use of measures to prevent pressure ulcers, such as skin inspection/care, positioning, turning and transferring tactics, use of skin protectors, or pressure-reducing support surfaces
Maintenance of endurance and strength-training exercises
Regular follow-up by the consulting teams who treated the patient in the hospital
Instructions on how and when medications should be taken and when follow-up laboratory tests should be performed
For patient education information, see the Erectile Dysfunction Center and Brain and Nervous System Center, as well as Impotence/Erectile Dysfunction, Erectile Dysfunction FAQs, and Cauda Equina Syndrome.
Mauffrey C, Randhawa K, Lewis C, Brewster M, Dabke H. Cauda equina syndrome: an anatomically driven review. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2008 Jun. 69(6):344-7. [Medline].
Rogers WK, Todd M. Acute spinal cord injury. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar. 30 (1):27-39. [Medline].
Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Hansson T, Holm S. Compression-induced changes of the nutritional supply to the porcine cauda equina. J Spinal Disord. 1990 Mar. 3(1):25-9. [Medline].
Delamarter RB, Sherman JE, Carr JB. 1991 Volvo Award in experimental studies. Cauda equina syndrome: neurologic recovery following immediate, early, or late decompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Sep. 16(9):1022-9. [Medline].
Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S. Edema formation in spinal nerve roots induced by experimental, graded compression. An experimental study on the pig cauda equina with special reference to differences in effects between rapid and slow onset of compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Jun. 14(6):569-73. [Medline].
Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S, Bagge U. Effects of experimental graded compression on blood flow in spinal nerve roots. A vital microscopic study on the porcine cauda equina. J Orthop Res. 1989. 7(6):817-23. [Medline].
Olmarker K, Holm S, Rydevik B. Importance of compression onset rate for the degree of impairment of impulse propagation in experimental compression injury of the porcine cauda equina. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 May. 15(5):416-9. [Medline].
Olmarker K, Holm S, Rosenqvist AL, Rydevik B. Experimental nerve root compression. A model of acute, graded compression of the porcine cauda equina and an analysis of neural and vascular anatomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Jan. 16(1):61-9. [Medline].
Metser U, Lerman H, Blank A, Lievshitz G, Bokstein F, Even-Sapir E. Malignant involvement of the spine: assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2004 Feb. 45(2):279-84. [Medline].
Takahashi K, Olmarker K, Holm S, Porter RW, Rydevik B. Double-level cauda equina compression: an experimental study with continuous monitoring of intraneural blood flow in the porcine cauda equina. J Orthop Res. 1993 Jan. 11(1):104-9. [Medline].
Rydevik BL, Pedowitz RA, Hargens AR, Swenson MR, Myers RR, Garfin SR. Effects of acute, graded compression on spinal nerve root function and structure. An experimental study of the pig cauda equina. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 May. 16(5):487-93. [Medline].
Rydevik B. Neurophysiology of cauda equina compression. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993. 251:52-5. [Medline].
Pedowitz RA, Garfin SR, Massie JB, et al. Effects of magnitude and duration of compression on spinal nerve root conduction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Feb. 17(2):194-9. [Medline].
Olivero WC, Wang H, Hanigan WC, et al. Cauda equina syndrome (CES) from lumbar disc herniations. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 May. 22(3):202-6. [Medline].
Kingwell SP, Curt A, Dvorak MF. Factors affecting neurological outcome in traumatic conus medullaris and cauda equina injuries. Neurosurgical Focus. 2008. 25(5):E7. [Medline].
Fujisawa H, Igarashi S, Koyama T. Acute cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation mimicking pure conus medullaris syndrome--case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1998 Jul. 38(7):429-31. [Medline].
Raj D, Coleman N. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Aug. 74(4):522-7. [Medline].
Gleave JR, MacFarlane R. Prognosis for recovery of bladder function following lumbar central disc prolapse. Br J Neurosurg. 1990. 4(3):205-9. [Medline].
Gellido CL, Onesti S, Llena J. Spinal schistosomiasis. Neurology. 2000 Jan 25. 54(2):527. [Medline].
Waters JH, Watson TB, Ward MG. Conus medullaris injury following both tetracaine and lidocaine spinal anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Dec. 8(8):656-8. [Medline].
Kothbauer K, Seiler RW. [Tethered spinal cord syndrome in adults]. Nervenarzt. 1997 Apr. 68(4):285-91. [Medline].
Widge AS, Tomycz ND, Kanter AS. Sacral preservation in cauda equina syndrome from inferior vena cava thrombosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Mar. 10(3):257-9. [Medline].
Rooney A, Statham PF, Stone J. Cauda equina syndrome with normal MR imaging. J Neurol. 2009 May. 256(5):721-5. [Medline].
Harrop JS, Hunt GE Jr, Vaccaro AR. Conus medullaris and cauda equina syndrome as a result of traumatic injuries: management principles. Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Jun 15. 16(6):e4. [Medline].
Fisher RG. Sacral fracture with compression of cauda equina: surgical treatment. J Trauma. 1988 Dec. 28(12):1678-80. [Medline].
Schizas C, Ballesteros C, Roy P. Cauda equina compression after trauma: an unusual presentation of spinal epidural lipoma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 15. 28(8):E148-51. [Medline].
Thongtrangan I, Le H, Park J, Kim DH. Cauda equina syndrome in patients with low lumbar fractures. Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Jun 15. 16(6):e6. [Medline].
Haldeman S, Rubinstein SM. Cauda equina syndrome in patients undergoing manipulation of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Dec. 17(12):1469-73. [Medline].
Muthukumar T, Butt SH, Cassar-Pullicino VN, McCall IW. Cauda equina syndrome presentation of sacral insufficiency fractures. Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Apr. 36(4):309-13. [Medline].
Kebaish KM, Awad JN. Spinal epidural hematoma causing acute cauda equina syndrome. Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Jun 15. 16(6):e1. [Medline].
Chen HJ, Liang CL, Lu K, Liliang PC, Tsai YD. Cauda equina syndrome caused by delayed traumatic spinal subdural haematoma. Injury. 2001 Jul. 32(6):505-7. [Medline].
Zuccarello M, Powers G, Tobler WD, Sawaya R, Hakim SZ. Chronic posttraumatic lumbar intradural arachnoid cyst with cauda equina compression: case report. Neurosurgery. 1987 Apr. 20(4):636-8. [Medline].
Raaf J. Removal of protruded lumbar intervertebral discs. J Neurosurg. 1970 May. 32(5):604-11. [Medline].
Kostuik JP, Harrington I, Alexander D, Rand W, Evans D. Cauda equina syndrome and lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Mar. 68(3):386-91. [Medline].
Shapiro S. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurgery. 1993 May. 32(5):743-6; discussion 746-7. [Medline].
Shapiro S. Medical realities of cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 1. 25(3):348-51; discussion 352. [Medline].
Ahn UM, Ahn NU, Buchowski JM, Garrett ES, Sieber AN, Kostuik JP. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 15. 25(12):1515-22. [Medline].
Scott PJ. Bladder paralysis in cauda equina lesions from disc prolapse. J Bone Joint Surg. 1965. 47B:224-235.
Dinning TA, Schaeffer HR. Discogenic compression of the cauda equina: a surgical emergency. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993 Dec. 63(12):927-34. [Medline].
Shaw M, Birch N. Facet joint cysts causing cauda equina compression. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Oct. 17(5):442-5. [Medline].
Ahn NU, Ahn UM, Nallamshetty L, et al. Cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis (the CES-AS syndrome): meta-analysis of outcomes after medical and surgical treatments. J Spinal Disord. 2001 Oct. 14(5):427-33. [Medline].
Tullous MW, Skerhut HE, Story JL, et al. Cauda equina syndrome of long-standing ankylosing spondylitis. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1990 Sep. 73(3):441-7. [Medline].
Devlin GP, Sheppeard H. Cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis diagnosed by computed tomography. N Z Med J. 1987 Oct 28. 100(834):651-2. [Medline].
Rubenstein DJ, Ghelman B. Case report 477: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) complicating long-standing ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Skeletal Radiol. 1988. 17(3):212-5. [Medline].
Indrieri RJ. Lumbosacral stenosis and injury of the cauda equina. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1988 May. 18(3):697-710. [Medline].
Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Imura S, Tomita K. The role of calcium deposition in the ligamentum flavum causing a cauda equina syndrome and lumbar radiculopathy. Paraplegia. 1995 Apr. 33(4):219-23. [Medline].
Schweitzer JS, Batzdorf U. Ependymoma of the cauda equina region: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome in 15 patients. Neurosurgery. 1992 Feb. 30(2):202-7. [Medline].
Kagaya H, Abe E, Sato K, Shimada Y, Kimura A. Giant cauda equina schwannoma. A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jan 15. 25(2):268-72. [Medline].
Bagley CA, Gokaslan ZL. Cauda equina syndrome caused by primary and metastatic neoplasms. Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Jun 15. 16(6):e3. [Medline].
Ampil FL, Mills GM, Burton GV. A retrospective study of metastatic lung cancer compression of the cauda equina. Chest. 2001 Nov. 120(5):1754-5. [Medline].
Saad F, Clarke N, Colombel M. Natural history and treatment of bone complications in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2006 Mar. 49(3):429-40. [Medline].
Natale M, Spennato P, Savarese L, Bocchetti A, Esposito S, Barbato R. Anaplastic oligodendroglioma presenting with drop metastases in the cauda equina. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005 Aug. 107(5):417-20. [Medline].
den Boon J, Avezaat CJ, van der Gaast A, Koops W, Huikeshoven FJ. Conus-cauda syndrome as a presenting symptom of endodermal sinus tumor of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Apr. 57(1):121-5. [Medline].
Bourezgui M, Rafai MA, El Moutawakkil B, et al. [Cauda equina syndrome revealing neuroblastoma]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2008 Dec. 164(12):1048-51. [Medline].
Lenehan B, Sullivan P, Street J, Dudeney S. Epidural abscess causing cauda equina syndrome. Ir J Med Sci. 2005 Jul-Sep. 174(3):88-91. [Medline].
Kapoor SK, Garg V, Dhaon BK, Jindal M. Tuberculosis of the posterior vertebral elements: a rare cause of compression of the cauda equina. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Feb. 87(2):391-4. [Medline].
Faraj A, Krishna M, Mehdian SM. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar spondylodiscitis caused by Streptococcus milleri. Eur Spine J. 1996. 5(2):134-6. [Medline].
Donovan DJ, Polly DW Jr, Ondra SL. The removal of a transdural pedicle screw placed for thoracolumbar spine fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Nov 1. 21(21):2495-8; discussion 2499. [Medline].
Rittmeister M, Leyendecker K, Kurth A, Schmitt E. Cauda equina compression due to a laminar hook: A late complication of posterior instrumentation in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J. 1999. 8(5):417-20. [Medline].
Mineiro J, Weinstein SL. Delayed postoperative paraparesis in scoliosis surgery. A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jul 15. 22(14):1668-72. [Medline].
Ilias WK, Klimscha W, Skrbensky G, Weinstabl R, Widhalm A. Continuous microspinal anaesthesia: another perspective on mechanisms inducing cauda equina syndrome. Anaesthesia. 1998 Jul. 53(7):618-23. [Medline].
Wera GD, Dean CL, Nho S, et al. Cauda equina syndrome resulting from treatment of dural ectasia with fibrin glue injection. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Apr. 19(2):148-50. [Medline].
Imran Y, Halim Y. Acute cauda equina syndrome secondary to free fat graft following spinal decompression. Singapore Med J. 2005 Jan. 46(1):25-7. [Medline].
Johnson ME. Potential neurotoxicity of spinal anesthesia with lidocaine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Sep. 75(9):921-32. [Medline].
Loo CC, Irestedt L. Cauda equina syndrome after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lignocaine: a review of six cases of cauda equina syndrome reported to the Swedish Pharmaceutical Insurance 1993-1997. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999 Apr. 43(4):371-9. [Medline].
Liu YC, Wu RS, Wong CS. Unexpected complication of attempted epidural anaesthesia: cauda equina syndrome. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003 Aug. 31(4):461-4. [Medline].
Pouchot J, Si-Hassen C, Damade R, Bayeux MC, Mathieu A, Vinceneux P. Cauda equina compression by epidural lipomatosis in obesity. Effectiveness of weight reduction. J Rheumatol. 1995 Sep. 22(9):1771-5. [Medline].
Diaz JH. Permanent paraparesis and cauda equina syndrome after epidural blood patch for postdural puncture headache. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jun. 96(6):1515-7. [Medline].
Prusick VR, Lint DS, Bruder WJ. Cauda equina syndrome as a complication of free epidural fat-grafting. A report of two cases and a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988 Sep. 70(8):1256-8. [Medline].
Lambert DH. Bupivacaine spinal block cauda equina syndrome: why did it happen?. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jun. 102(6):1285-6; author reply 1287-8. [Medline].
O'Laughlin SJ, Kokosinski E. Cauda equina syndrome in a pregnant woman referred to physical therapy for low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Nov. 38(11):721. [Medline].
Bell DA, Collie D, Statham PF. Cauda equina syndrome: what is the correlation between clinical assessment and MRI scanning?. Br J Neurosurg. 2007 Apr. 21(2):201-3. [Medline].
Ma B, Wu H, Jia LS, Yuan W, Shi GD, Shi JG. Cauda equina syndrome: a review of clinical progress. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 May 20. 122(10):1214-22. [Medline].
Balzer JR, Rose RD, Welch WC, Sclabassi RJ. Simultaneous somatosensory evoked potential and electromyographic recordings during lumbosacral decompression and instrumentation. Neurosurgery. 1998 Jun. 42(6):1318-24; discussion 1324-5. [Medline].
Mathew P, Todd NV. Diagnosis of intradural conus and cauda equina tumours. Br J Hosp Med. 1993 Aug 18-31. 50(4):169-70, 172-4. [Medline].
Bell DA, Collie D, Statham PF. Cauda equina syndrome: what is the correlation between clinical assessment and MRI scanning?. Br J Neurosurg. 2007 Apr. 21(2):201-3. [Medline].
Coscia M, Leipzig T, Cooper D. Acute cauda equina syndrome. Diagnostic advantage of MRI. Spine. 1994 Feb 15. 19(4):475-8. [Medline].
Mailleux R, Redant C, Milbouw G. MR diagnosis of transdural disc herniation causing cauda equine syndrome. JBR-BTR. 2006 Nov-Dec. 89(6):303-5. [Medline].
Kikuchi M, Nagao K, Muraosa Y, Ohnuma S, Hoshino H. Cauda equina syndrome complicating pneumococcal meningitis. Pediatr Neurol. 1999 Feb. 20(2):152-4. [Medline].
Spencer TS, Campellone JV, Maldonado I, et al. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging manifestations of neurosarcoidosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2005. 34(4):649-661. [Medline].
Podnar S. Electromyography of the anal sphincter: which muscle to examine?. Muscle Nerve. 2003 Sep. 28(3):377-9. [Medline].
Joaquim AF, Powers A, Laufer I, Bilsky MH. An update in the management of spinal metastases. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2015 Sep. 73 (9):795-802. [Medline].
Gleave JR, Macfarlane R. Cauda equina syndrome: what is the relationship between timing of surgery and outcome?. Br J Neurosurg. 2002 Aug. 16(4):325-8. [Medline].
Hussain SA, Gullan RW, Chitnavis BP. Cauda equina syndrome: outcome and implications for management. Br J Neurosurg. 2003 Apr. 17(2):164-7. [Medline].
Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Adult low back pain. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2008 Nov. [Full Text].
Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. Management of acute low back pain. Southfield (MI): Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium; 2008 Mar. [Full Text].
Bussieres AE, Taylor JA, Peterson C. Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults-an evidence-based approach-part 3: spinal disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Jan. 31(1):33-88. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Herschorn S, Gajewski J, Ethans K, et al. Efficacy of botulinum toxin A injection for neurogenic detrusor overactivity and urinary incontinence: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol. 2011 Jun. 185(6):2229-35. [Medline].
Cruz F, Herschorn S, Aliotta P, et al. Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011 Oct. 60(4):742-50. [Medline].
Ginsberg D, et al. Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients With Urinary Incontinence Due to Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity. Presented at 107th Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, Washington, DC. May, 2011.
McCarthy MJ, Aylott CE, Grevitt MP, Hegarty J. Cauda equina syndrome: factors affecting long-term functional and sphincteric outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 15. 32(2):207-16. [Medline].
O'Laoire SA, Crockard HA, Thomas DG. Prognosis for sphincter recovery after operation for cauda equina compression owing to lumbar disc prolapse. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jun 6. 282(6279):1852-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Weninger P, Schultz A, Hertz H. Conservative management of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine compression and burst fractures: functional and radiographic outcomes in 136 cases treated by closed reduction and casting. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Feb. 129(2):207-19. [Medline].
Sayegh FE, Kapetanos GA, Symeonides PP, Anogiannakis G, Madentzidis M. Functional outcome after experimental cauda equina compression. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jul. 79(4):670-4. [Medline].
|Conus Medullaris Syndrome||Cauda Equina Syndrome|
|Presentation||Sudden and bilateral||Gradual and unilateral|
|Reflexes||Knee jerks preserved but ankle jerks affected||Both ankle and knee jerks affected|
|Radicular pain||Less severe||More severe|
|Low back pain||More||Less|
|Sensory symptoms and signs||Numbness tends to be more localized to perianal area; symmetrical and bilateral; sensory dissociation occurs||Numbness tends to be more localized to saddle area; asymmetrical, may be unilateral; no sensory dissociation; loss of sensation in specific dermatomes in lower extremities with numbness and paresthesia; possible numbness in pubic area, including glans penis or clitoris|
|Motor strength||Typically symmetric, hyperreflexic distal paresis of lower limbs that is less marked; fasciculations may be present||Asymmetric areflexic paraplegia that is more marked; fasciculations rare; atrophy more common|
|Impotence||Frequent||Less frequent; erectile dysfunction that includes inability to have erection, inability to maintain erection, lack of sensation in pubic area (including glans penis or clitoris), and inability to ejaculate|
|Sphincter dysfunction||Urinary retention and atonic anal sphincter cause overflow urinary incontinence and fecal incontinence; tend to present early in course of disease||Urinary retention; tends to present late in course of disease|
|Nerve Root||Pain||Sensory Deficit||Motor Deficit||Reflex Deficit|
|L2||Anterior medial thigh||Upper thigh||Slight quadriceps weakness; hip flexion; thigh adduction||Slightly diminished suprapatellar|
|L3||Anterior lateral thigh||Lower thigh||Quadriceps weakness; knee extension; thigh adduction||Patellar or suprapatellar|
|L4||Posterolateral thigh, anterior tibia||Medial leg||Knee and foot extension||Patellar|
|L5||Dorsum of foot||Dorsum of foot||Dorsiflexion of foot and toes||Hamstrings|
|S1-2||Lateral foot||Lateral foot||Plantar flexion of foot and toes||Achilles|
|Iliopsoas||Femoral||L2, 3, 4|
|Adductor longus||Obturator||L2, 3, 4|
|Gracilis||Obturator||L2, 3, 4|
|Quadriceps femoris||Femoral||L2, 3, 4|
|Anterior tibial||Deep peroneal||L4, 5|
|Extensor hallucis longus||Deep peroneal||L4, 5|
|Extensor digitorum longus||Deep peroneal||L4,5|
|Extensor digitorum brevis||Deep peroneal||L4, 5, S1|
|Peroneus longus||Superficial peroneal||L5, S1|
|Internal hamstrings||Sciatic||L4, 5, S1|
|External hamstrings||Sciatic||L5, S1|
|Gluteus medius||Superior gluteal||L4, 5, S1|
|Gluteus maximus||Inferior gluteal||L5, S1, 2|
|Posterior tibial||Tibial||L5, S1|
|Flexor digitorum longus||Tibial||L5, S1|
|Abductor hallucis brevis||Tibial (medial plantar)||L5, S1, 2|
|Abductor digiti quinti pedis||Tibial (lateral plantar)||S1, 2|
|Gastrocnemius lateral||Tibial||L5, S1, 2|
|Gastrocnemius medial||Tibial||S1, 2|
|Features||Cauda Equina Syndrome||Conus Medullaris|
|Spinal level||Injury to the lumbosacral nerve roots||Injury of the sacral cord segment (conus and epiconus) and roots|
|Severity of symptoms and signs||Usually severe||Usually not severe|
|Symmetry of symptoms and signs||Usually asymmetric||Usually symmetric|
|Pain||Prominent, asymmetric, and radicular||Usually bilateral and in the perineal area|
|Motor||Weakness to flaccid paralysis||Normal motor function to mild or moderate weakness|
|Sensory||Saddle anesthesia, may be asymmetric||Symmetric saddle distribution, sensory loss of pin prick, and temperature sensations (Tactile sensation is spared.)|
|Reflexes||Areflexic lower extremities; bulbocavernosus reflex is absent in low CE (sacral) lesions||Areflexic lower extremities
(If the epiconus is involved, patellar reflex may be absent, whereas bulbocavernosus reflex may be spared.)
|Sphincter and sexual function||Usually late and of lesser magnitude;
lower sacral roots involvement can cause bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction
|Early and severe bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction that results in a reflexic bowel and bladder with impaired erection in males|
|EMG||Multiple root level involvement; sphincters may also be involved||Mostly normal lower extremity with external anal sphincter involvement|
|Outcome||May be favorable compared with conus medullaris syndrome||The outcome may be less favorable than in patients with CES|