Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis Workup

  • Author: R Andrew Sewell, MD; Chief Editor: Stephen A Berman, MD, PhD, MBA   more...
 
Updated: Feb 3, 2012
 

Laboratory Studies

  • The diagnosis is made with positive CSF cytologic results (the most useful test), subarachnoid metastases identified on radiologic studies, or a history and physical examination suggestive of LC along with abnormal CSF findings. Order a workup for LC in patients presenting with the following:
    • Neurologic signs and symptoms at more than 1 level of the neuraxis (present in 75% of patients with LC).
    • Neurologic signs and symptoms consistent with a single lesion but with no mass evident on imaging.
    • Neurologic signs and symptoms consistent with inflammatory meningitis but without fever.
    • Imaging showing leptomeningeal enhancement or CSF-flow obstruction.
    • Elevated CSF protein level in a patient with cancer but without known cerebral metastases.
  • The first step in the diagnostic workup should be gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the area of maximal symptomatology, followed by a lumbar puncture (LP) if the patient has no evidence of increased ICP, repeated as many as 3 times or until findings are positive.
Next

Imaging Studies

  • In general, imaging findings are consistent with or suggestive rather than diagnostic of LC, and they are most useful in detecting secondary complications of LC, such as hydrocephalus, periventricular edema, and gyral effacement.
    • About 50% of patients with LC have abnormal imaging findings, most commonly contrast enhancement of the basilar cisterns, cortical convexities, cauda equina, or hydrocephalus without a mass legion. However, this enhancement usually follows positive cytologic findings by 6 months.
    • MRI of the spinal cord involvement can show nerve-root thickening, cord enlargement, intraparenchymal and subarachnoid nodules, or epidural compression.
    • Meningeal enhancement, which reflects either a blood supply outside the blood-brain barrier or a disturbed blood-brain barrier, is also seen in infections, inflammatory diseases, trauma, or subdural hematomas; after craniotomy; and sometimes after LP. Nevertheless, delineation of the extent of leptomeningeal disease through imaging is important because radiotherapy then can be effectively targeted to these regions rather than to the entire neuraxis.
  • Perform contrast-enhanced brain CT or gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the entire CNS in patients with cancer and neurologic symptoms to look for metastases and to determine the risk of herniation from LP. However, these tests are relatively insensitive for LC itself. The sensitivity of MRI for LC is nearly 70% while that of CT is around 30%; both have a false-negative rate of 60%, however, so normal imaging does not exclude the diagnosis.
  • CT, although usually normal, may reveal unexplained communicating hydrocephalus or abnormal enhancement of the tentorium, sylvian fissures and basal cisterns, cortical subarachnoid space, and ventricular walls.
  • Although seldom indicated, myelography may show nodularities or thickening of the nerve roots in approximately 25% of patients with LC, with similar findings apparent on MRI. Myelography can show intra-arachnoid nodular filling defects, longitudinal striations, prominent and crowded nerve roots of the cauda equina, or scalloping of the subarachnoid space.
Previous
Next

Other Tests

  • Radionuclide studies using either111 indium-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid or99 Tc macroaggregated albumin can be used to assess CSF flow, which is abnormal in 30-40% of patients with LC. Abnormal CSF flow must be addressed prior to the administration of intrathecal chemotherapy, as it can prevent homogenous delivery.
  • Myelography, cerebral arteriography, and other tests, such as EEG, seldom are indicated.
  • Electromyography (EMG) can assist with diagnosis, but it is rarely necessary.
  • Monoclonal antibodies can be useful in diagnosing CSF lymphoma, particularly if cytologic examination cannot distinguish between reactive lymphocytes and malignant lymphocytes.
Previous
Next

Procedures

Lumbar puncture is the most useful test.

  • Analysis of CSF obtained is more accurate than that obtained by using a ventricular catheter, as ventricular fluid usually has higher glucose and lower protein levels and is less likely to yield positive cytologic findings. For this reason, periodic LP is recommended, even in patients with catheters.
  • Measure the opening pressure (elevated in 50% of patients) and send the CSF for an analysis of cytology, cell counts, and protein and glucose levels.
  • Carcinoma cells in the CSF are diagnostic, with the exception of a few false-positive results in patients who have reactive lymphocytes (which are difficult to distinguish from malignant lymphomatous cells) because of an infectious or inflammatory process in the CSF. However, negative cytologic findings do not rule out the diagnosis, as 50% of patients with LC have a negative cytologic result on the first LP. This percentage drops to 20% after 2 high-volume LPs and 15% after 3.
  • Cytologic findings are more likely to be positive in patients with extensive leptomeningeal involvement than in patients with focal involvement because CSF obtained from a site distant to the pathology is more likely to yield negative pathology.
  • Other causes of false negatives can include not obtaining CSF from a site of symptomatic or radiographically demonstrated disease, withdrawing < 10.5 mL CSF, delayed processing of samples, and obtaining only 1 sample.
  • CSF pleocytosis and modest protein elevations are consistent with but not indicative of the diagnosis, but reduced glucose levels usually are seen only with LC (ie, abnormal glucose transport) or infection (ie, increased glucose utilization).
  • The lymphocyte count is elevated in more than 50% of patients with LC, and the presence of eosinophils should raise the suspicion of lymphomatous infiltration (except patients who are given ibuprofen).
  • Xanthochromia can occur from leptomeningeal bleeding, which is most likely in LC from a melanoma.
  • Most biochemical markers in CSF have poor sensitivity and specificity, but when present, levels decline with successful therapy. Their reelevation can thus signal a relapse before any other findings become apparent. Useful markers include carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) from adenocarcinomas, alpha-fetoprotein and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin from testicular cancers, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) from carcinoid tumors, and immunoglobulins from multiple myeloma; their presence in CSF is virtually diagnostic. Nonspecific markers such as endothelial growth factor can be strong indirect indicators of LC, but none are sensitive enough to improve th e cytological diagnosis.
    • Epithelial-associated glycoprotein (HMFGI antigen) is present in 90% of LCs.
    • Cytokeratins measured by tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) have 80% sensitivity to LC from breast cancer.
    • Neither CEA nor beta-glucuronidase is helpful in detecting solid tumors or metastases, nor are they useful in detecting leptomeningeal lymphomatosis. However, if their levels are elevated, a return to normal levels of both markers signifies successful treatment.
    • Elevated CSF CEA is specific, unless serum levels are unusually high (ie, >100 ng/mL).
    • CSF beta-glucuronidase values are frequently elevated, but wide fluctuations make it unreliable as a marker, and elevations also occur with bacterial, viral, fungal, or tubercular meningitis. In association with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), however, high CSF beta-glucuronidase levels can indicate LC from a breast primary tumor with a high sensitivity and specificity.
    • CSF fibronectin values are elevated in LC but also in bacterial meningitis and tick-borne encephalitis.
    • Myelin basic protein can indicate disease activity, particularly if values are measured longitudinally.
    • CSF vascular growth factor has recently been suggested as a useful biomarker.[3]
    • Antithrombin III has been suggested as a useful biomarker in patients with primary CNS lymphoma but has not been evaluated in patients with LC.
  • For lymphoma and leukemia, the weight of the evidence (as well as recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines) suggests that flow cytometry is more sensitive than cytology and should be used instead.[4, 5]
  • Monoclonal antibodies are not more sensitive than cytology but can be used to distinguish between reactive and neoplastic lymphocytes in the case of LC from lymphoma.
  • Creatine-kinase BB isoenzyme (CK-BB), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), b2- microglobulin, β -glucuronidase, LDH isoenzyme-5, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are strong indirect indicators of LC, but are not sensitive enough to improve on cytology.
  • LDH concentrations are elevated in cases of stroke, bacterial meningitis, CSF pleocytosis, head injury, primary CNS tumors, and some metastases. Levels are also elevated in 80% of LCs; therefore, they can be useful in confirming the diagnosis. LDH isoenzyme-5 levels are elevated in LCs from breast or lung primary tumors and melanoma, as well as bacterial meningitis, but they are sometimes normal even when cytologic findings are positive
  • Levels of CSF β 2 -microglobulin may be useful in detecting LC caused by hematologic spread but not in LC from solid tumors. levels may be elevated after treatment with intrathecal methotrexate (MTX).
  • Ferritin levels are sensitive to inflammatory changes in the CSF, but they are nonspecific for early LC.
  • CSF alkaline phosphatase levels may be elevated in an LC from a lung primary tumor.
  • CSF prostate-specific antigen (PSA) may be elevated in an LC from a prostate primary tumor.
  • PCR is not useful as the precise genetic alteration of the neoplasia is usually not known.
Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

Leptomeningeal biopsy may be necessary if the patient has no evidence of a primary tumor. The findings can be diagnostic if results of all other tests are negative, especially if taken from an enhancing region identified on MRI. Macroscopic pathology shows diffuse fibrotic thickening of the brain and spinal cord, as well as layering of the nerve roots with tumor tissue. Microscopic examination shows local fibrosis with tumor cells covering the blood vessels and nerves, either as a single layer or as aggregates.

Previous
Next

Staging

Staging varies by primary cancer, but metastatic disease is stage IV by definition.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

R Andrew Sewell, MD  Associate Research Scientist in Psychiatry and Mental Illness Research, Education,Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System, Yale University School of Medicine

R Andrew Sewell, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Headache Society, American Pain Society, and American Psychiatric Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Lawrence D Recht, MD  Professor of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurosciences, Stanford University Medical School

Lawrence D Recht, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Association for Cancer Research, American Neurological Association, and Society for Neuroscience

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Frederick M Vincent Sr, MD  Clinical Professor, Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University Colleges of Human and Osteopathic Medicine

Frederick M Vincent Sr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American College of Forensic Examiners, American College of Legal Medicine, American College of Physicians, and Michigan State Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Jorge C Kattah, MD  Head, Associate Program Director, Professor, Department of Neurology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria

Jorge C Kattah, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Neurological Association, and New York Academy of Sciences

Disclosure: Biogen Honoraria Consulting; Bayer Corporation Honoraria Consulting

Selim R Benbadis, MD  Professor, Director of Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Tampa General Hospital, University of South Florida College of Medicine

Selim R Benbadis, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Sleep Medicine, American Clinical Neurophysiology Society, American Epilepsy Society, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: UCB Pharma Honoraria Speaking, consulting; Lundbeck Honoraria Speaking, consulting; Cyberonics Honoraria Speaking, consulting; Glaxo Smith Kline Honoraria Speaking, consulting; Pfizer Honoraria Speaking, consulting; Sleepmed/DigiTrace Honoraria Speaking, consulting

Chief Editor

Stephen A Berman, MD, PhD, MBA  Professor of Neurology, University of Central Florida College of Medicine

Stephen A Berman, MD, PhD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Neurology, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Chamberlain MC. Leptomeningeal metastasis. Curr Opin Neurol. Sep 4 2009;[Medline].

  2. Gani C, Müller AC, Eckert F, Schroeder C, Bender B, Pantazis G, et al. Outcome after whole brain radiotherapy alone in intracranial leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from solid tumors. Strahlenther Onkol. Feb 2012;188(2):148-153. [Medline].

  3. Groves MD, Hess KR, Puduvalli VK, Colman H, Conrad CA, Gilbert MR. Biomarkers of disease: cerebrospinal fluid vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and stromal cell derived factor (SDF)-1 levels in patients with neoplastic meningitis (NM) due to breast cancer, lung cancer and melanoma. J Neurooncol. Sep 2009;94(2):229-34. [Medline].

  4. Quijano S, López A, Manuel Sancho J, Panizo C, Debén G, Castilla C, et al. Identification of leptomeningeal disease in aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: improved sensitivity of flow cytometry. J Clin Oncol. Mar 20 2009;27(9):1462-9. [Medline].

  5. Subirá D, Serrano C, Castañón S, Gonzalo R, Illán J, Pardo J, et al. Role of flow cytometry immunophenotyping in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Neuro Oncol. Jan 2012;14(1):43-52. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  6. Wasserstrom WR, Glass JP, Posner JB. Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer. Feb 15 1982;49(4):759-72. [Medline].

  7. Rubenstein JL, Fridlyand J, Abrey L, Shen A, Karch J, Wang E, et al. Phase I study of intraventricular administration of rituximab in patients with recurrent CNS and intraocular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. Apr 10 2007;25(11):1350-6. [Medline].

  8. Stemmler HJ, Mengele K, Schmitt M, Harbeck N, Laessig D, Herrmann KA. Intrathecal trastuzumab (Herceptin) and methotrexate for meningeal carcinomatosis in HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer: a case report. Anticancer Drugs. Sep 2008;19(8):832-6. [Medline].

  9. Lin N, Dunn IF, Glantz M, Allison DL, Jensen R, Johnson MD, et al. Benefit of ventriculoperitoneal cerebrospinal fluid shunting and intrathecal chemotherapy in neoplastic meningitis: a retrospective, case-controlled study. J Neurosurg. Oct 2011;115(4):730-6. [Medline].

  10. Nagano T, Kotani Y, Kobayashi K, Hatakeyama Y, Hori S, Kasai D, et al. Long-term outcome after multidisciplinary approach for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in a non-small cell lung cancer patient with poor performance status. Intern Med. 2011;50(24):3019-22. [Medline].

  11. Balm M, Hammack J. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: presenting features and prognostic factors. Arch Neurol. Jul 1996;53(7):626-32. [Medline].

  12. Bradley WG. Leptomeningeal metastases in primary and secondary tumors of the nervous system. In: Neurology in Clinical Practice. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991.

  13. Brem SS, Bierman PJ, Black P, Brem H, Chamberlain MC, Chiocca EA. Central nervous system cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. May 2008;6(5):456-504. [Medline].

  14. Chamberlain MC, Kormanik PA, Glantz MJ. A comparison between ventricular and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid cytology in adult patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Neuro-oncol. Jan 2001;3(1):42-5. [Medline].

  15. Cokgor I, Friedman AH, Friedman HS. Current options for the treatment of neoplastic meningitis. J Neurooncol. Oct 2002;60(1):79-88. [Medline].

  16. Gasecki AP, Bashir RM, Foley J. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: a report of 3 cases and review of the literature. Eur Neurol. 1992;32(2):74-8. [Medline].

  17. Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Glantz LK, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology in patients with cancer: minimizing false- negative results. Cancer. Feb 15 1998;82(4):733-9. [Medline].

  18. Grossman SA, Krabak MJ. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Rev. Apr 1999;25(2):103-19. [Medline].

  19. Hildebrand J. Prophylaxis and treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in solid tumors of adulthood. J Neurooncol. Jun-Jul 1998;38(2-3):193-8. [Medline].

  20. Pavlidis N. The diagnostic and therapeutic management of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Ann Oncol. 2004;15 Suppl 4:iv285-91. [Medline].

  21. Posner JB. Leptomeningeal metastases. In: Neurologic Complications of Cancer. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1995.

  22. Recht L, Phuphanich S. Treatment of neoplastic meningitis: what is the standard of care?. Expert Rev Neurother. Jul 2004;4(4 Suppl):S11-7. [Medline].

  23. Roy S, Josephson SA, Fridlyand J, Karch J, Kadoch C, Karrim J. Protein biomarker identification in the CSF of patients with CNS lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1 2008;26(1):96-105. [Medline].

  24. Soletormos G, Bach F. Cerebrospinal Fluid Cytokeratins for Diagnosis of Patients with Central Nervous System Metastases from Breast Cancer. Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:948-950.

  25. Tetef ML, Margolin KA, Doroshow JH, et al. Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of high-dose intravenous methotrexate in the treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2000;46(1):19-26. [Medline].

  26. Wolfgang G, Marcus D, Ulrike S. LC: clinical syndrome in different primaries. J Neurooncol. Jun-Jul 1998;38(2-3):103-10. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.