eMedicine Specialties > Neurology > Neuro-vascular Diseases

Reperfusion Injury in Stroke

Author: Hoda Elzawahry, MD, Resident Physician, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida College of Medicine
Coauthor(s): Pedro E Hernandez-Frau, MD, Resident Physician, Department of Neurology, University South Florida and Tampa General Hospital; Reza Behrouz, DO, Assistant Professor of Vascular and Critical Care Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida College of Medicine; Co-Director, Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit, Tampa General Hospital; Wayne M Clark, MD, Director of Oregon Stroke Center, Professor, Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jun 24, 2009

Definition

Cerebral hyperperfusion or reperfusion syndrome is a rare but a serious complication following revascularization. Hyperperfusion is defined as a major increase in ipsilateral cerebral blood flow (CBF) that is well above the metabolic demands of the brain tissue. Quantitatively, hyperperfusion is a 100% or greater increase in CBF compared to preexisting baseline.1 This definition also extends to rapid restoration of normal perfusion pressure, for example thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Reperfusion syndrome can occur as a complication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA), intracranial stenting, and even bland cerebral infarction.

The terms hyperperfusion and reperfusion are often used interchangeably. The former implies excessive flow while the later suggests normalization of flow.1,2 Both can result in cerebral injury with similar clinical pictures, hence the basis in substitution of terms. However, not all patients with hyperperfusion are symptomatic; conversely, patients with only moderate rises in CBF can have devastating outcomes. Therefore some authors prefer to address this subject as reperfusion syndrome.2

Clinical presentation

  • Cerebral reperfusion syndrome presents as a triad of ipsilateral headache, contralateral neurological deficits, and seizure.1
  • The time frame in which symptoms arise can be immediately after restoration of blood flow and up to 1 month later. Patients are usually symptomatic within the first week.1,3,4
  • Headache is the most common symptom (62%).5  Typically, patients display migrainous features with severe, ipsilateral, pounding headache.
  • Deficits are usually cortical (eg, hemiplegia, neglect, aphasia) or may be worsening of preexisting deficit. By the same token of cortical affection, seizures present as focal or generalized.1,4

Pathophysiology

Several mechanisms have been proposed to the pathogenesis of cerebral reperfusion injury. These range from modifiable events such as postoperative hypertension to molecular modalities such as free oxygen radical release. Each theory is complex and none are widely accepted. For the time being, known risk factors include the following:6

  • Postoperative hypertension
  • High-grade stenosis with poor collateral flow
  • Decreased cerebral vasoreactivity
  • Increased peak pressure, such as in contralateral carotid occlusion
  • Recent contralateral CEA (<3 mo)
  • Intraoperative distal carotid pressure of less than 40 mm Hg
  • Intraoperative ischemia peak flow velocity

Hypertension

Elevated blood pressure is the most common factor found in symptomatic patients.5,7,8 During acute ischemic stroke, systemic blood pressure often rises as a physiologic compensation for cerebral ischemia.9  As a rule, elevated blood pressure is not treated so as not to compromise flow to the tenuous penumbra. The key to reperfusion injury in this scenario is ischemic disruption of the blood brain barrier (BBB). The offended BBB is comprised of abnormally permeable ischemic capillaries. Adding insult to injury, these small vessels do not have a substantial conduit to buffer systemic pressures. The injured endothelium is unable to maintain their structure against systemic vascular resistance, thus resulting in reperfusion injury or hemorrhagic transformation.10  

Dysautoregulation

Cerebral autoregulation protects the brain against changes in systemic blood pressure. A drop in blood pressure could lead to ischemia, while on the other hand a sudden rise could lead to edema or hemorrhage. In patients with high grade stenosis, CBF is maintained at the expense of maximal arteriolar vasodilatation.11 Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion (eg, critical stenosis) leads to production of carbon dioxide and nitric oxide. These are vasodilatory substances causing endothelial dysfunction.12 In the absence of cerebral autoregulation, CBF is directly dependent on the systemic blood pressure. Correction of a critical stenosis causes rapid and large changes in the CBF, which leads to edema or hemorrhage.13

Ischemia-reperfusion

Ischemia-reperfusion injury is characterized by oxidant production, complement activation and increased microvascular permeability. Various cytokines peak in the serum within the first 24 hours of an acute stroke, and are thought to initiate the cascade of tissue damage. At the site of ischemia itself, activated leukocytes release free radicals and toxins causing further destruction. The combination results in an impaired BBB, which could lead to cerebral edema and/or hemorrhage.14 These changes are especially important in a coexisting setting with hypertension, as eluded to above.

Reperfusion Injury After Thrombolytic Therapy

Symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation rates within 24-36 hours of stroke are increased in the setting of revascularization therapy regardless of modality (intravenous lytics, intra-arterial lytics, antithrombotics, mechanical devices).15 In the absence of revascularization therapy, hemorrhagic transformation is a common and natural consequence of infarction.16

In the setting of revascularization, the fundamental question is if the increased rates of hemorrhagic transformation are caused by reperfusion and the biochemical pathways, or if they are specific consequences of the lytic state itself.

Rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage are generally higher in intra-arterial lytic trials17 (10% in PROACT-II) compared with intravenous lytic trials (6.4% in NINDS).18
 
Antithrombotic trials using heparins and heparinoids have shown lower hemorrhagic transformation rates compared with rt-PA. However, the relatively low hemorrhagic transformation rates remain in excess of their minimal benefit in the acute setting and often include less severely affected subjects.19,20,21
 
Hemorrhagic transformation is now known to be a multifactorial process.  

  • Stroke severity is likely to be a major predictor of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage because it is associated with volume of ischemic brain at risk for hemorrhagic transformation.
  • Older patients may be at greater risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
  • Higher lytic doses are associated with higher symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage risk, but whether lower doses can achieve adequate benefit with less risk is not known.
  • Delayed revascularization minimizes benefit and likely increases risk. The goal of acute revascularization should not just be to open occluded vessels, but to open them quickly. Patient selection based on physiological parameters is likely important to reduce late hemorrhage attributable to revascularization.

Prevention

Preoperative transcranial Doppler

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) measures cerebral blood flow in major cerebral arteries. Low preoperative distal carotid artery pressure (<40 mm Hg) and an increased peak blood flow velocity have been found to be predictive of postoperative hyperperfusion.13,14 Therefore, TCD can be used to select patients for aggressive post procedure observation and management. In a patient who is determined to be at risk, TCD can also be used during the postoperative period to assess for hyperperfusion.

Preoperative acetazolamide SPECT scan

Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) to carbon dioxide can test for cerebral hemodynamic reserve. Normally, administration of acetazolamide (a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor that causes a local increase in carbon dioxide) induces a rapid increase in CBF.22  This iatrogenic CBF surge is measured using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). In chronic cerebral ischemia, the vasculature is maximally dilated. Therefore, there is little change in CBF, which means decreased CVR. Patients with low preoperative CVR are at risk of developing hyperperfusion and thus parenchymal injury.23,24

Blood pressure control

The most important factor in preventing reperfusion syndrome is early identification and control hypertension.3,7,25 This is important even in normotensive patients since delayed hypertension can occur.4 The use of TCD pre- and postoperatively can aid in identifying patients with increased CBF and consequently risk of hyperperfusion.23,24 Blood pressure should then be aggressively controlled CBF elevates.

Pressures can be gently reduced with antihypertensive that do not increase CBF or cause excessive vasodilatation. Examples include labetalol or nicardipine. Less favorable medications include intravenous ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers or vasodilators such as nitroprusside.23,26

Unfortunately, no specific parameters or guidelines have yet been determined for optimal blood pressure during these circumstances. According to the American Stroke Association ICH guidelines, the blood pressure goal for an acute intracranial hemorrhage is MAP <110.27,28  This modest pressure can also function in acute ischemic stroke with reperfusion issues because it does not hypoperfuse the tenuous surrounding tissues, nor does it further aggravate injury or hemorrhagic conversion. In any case, the consensus remains that patients should be observed postoperatively in an ICU setting. If blood pressure management is an issue, it should be managed in the ICU until stabilized.

Free-radical scavengers and anti-adhesion therapy

Free radicals produced during ischemia have been a purported culprit in reperfusion injury. Free-radical scavengers and antiadhesion therapy have shown promise in decreasing the incidence of endothelial injury.14

Animal studies using various methods of modulating the cytokine response have found beneficial effects for IL-1 and TNF. Various experimental studies using agents that block leukocyte endothelial adhesion (ie, monoclonal antibodies that block either the adhesion receptor on leukocytes [CD-18] or the corresponding adhesion receptor on the endothelial cell [ICAM-1]) have found beneficial effects in terms of reducing infarct size and improving functional outcome.

In general, these experimental studies have found benefit when a period of ischemia is followed by a return of blood flow (reperfusion) but not in studies in which ischemia is permanent. For this reason, these anti-adhesion therapies may prove to be most beneficial clinically when given in association with thrombolytic agents.

Although clinical studies using antibodies against ICAM-1 have failed to find a clinical benefit, further investigations of antiadhesion therapies with TPA are ongoing. Given the strong preclinical support for the usefulness of anti–reperfusion injury agents, they are likely to be used in future "stroke cocktail" therapeutic efforts.

Summary

When patients are identified and treated early the prognosis is better and incidence of intracranial hemorrhage is less.23  Outcomes are dependent upon timely recognition and prevention of precipitating factors. Most important is the treatment of hypertension before it can inflict damages such as edema or hemorrhage. Prognosis following hemorrhagic transformation is poor. Mortality in such cases is 36–63% and morbidity is 80% in survivors.3,7,25

Studies indicate that CNS reperfusion injury is involved directly in the potentiation of stroke damage. Components of the inflammatory response, including cytokine release and leukocyte adhesion, appear to play key roles in these deleterious effects.

Multimedia

A. Schematic representation of the process of end...Media file 1: A. Schematic representation of the process of endothelial-dependent leukocyte adhesion. Endothelial cells activated by histamine or thrombin rapidly translocate P-selectin to their surfaces (also E-selectin, not shown), tethering leukocytes to the endothelial cell. This tethering does not require an active response from the leukocyte. Once tethered, other factors, including platelet-activating factor and cytokines, are released to stimulate a leukocyte activation response. This response includes shape-changing and increased surface expression of CD-11/CD-18. The CD-11/CD-18 then binds to the corresponding intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) receptor on the endothelial cell, leading to firm endothelial attachment. This attachment may produce either direct obstruction of the microcirculation or lead to infiltration into the surrounding brain parenchyma.B. Schematic representation showing that through the use of monoclonal antibodies directed against the anti-ICAM-1 receptor, the CD-11/CD-18 to ICAM-1 attachment is prevented. This, in turn, prevents subsequent microvessel obstruction and leukocyte infiltration.
A. Schematic representation of the process of end...

A. Schematic representation of the process of endothelial-dependent leukocyte adhesion. Endothelial cells activated by histamine or thrombin rapidly translocate P-selectin to their surfaces (also E-selectin, not shown), tethering leukocytes to the endothelial cell. This tethering does not require an active response from the leukocyte. Once tethered, other factors, including platelet-activating factor and cytokines, are released to stimulate a leukocyte activation response. This response includes shape-changing and increased surface expression of CD-11/CD-18. The CD-11/CD-18 then binds to the corresponding intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) receptor on the endothelial cell, leading to firm endothelial attachment. This attachment may produce either direct obstruction of the microcirculation or lead to infiltration into the surrounding brain parenchyma.B. Schematic representation showing that through the use of monoclonal antibodies directed against the anti-ICAM-1 receptor, the CD-11/CD-18 to ICAM-1 attachment is prevented. This, in turn, prevents subsequent microvessel obstruction and leukocyte infiltration.

Postcontrast image 24 hours after a right middle ...Media file 2: Postcontrast image 24 hours after a right middle cerebral artery stroke, which demonstrates contrast extravasation through a faulty blood brain barrier.
Postcontrast image 24 hours after a right middle ...

Postcontrast image 24 hours after a right middle cerebral artery stroke, which demonstrates contrast extravasation through a faulty blood brain barrier.

T1 sagittal image without contrast demonstrating ...Media file 3: T1 sagittal image without contrast demonstrating gyriform hyperintensities. These represent subacute petechial hemorrhage around an area of subacute infarction secondary to uncontrolled hypertension.
T1 sagittal image without contrast demonstrating ...

T1 sagittal image without contrast demonstrating gyriform hyperintensities. These represent subacute petechial hemorrhage around an area of subacute infarction secondary to uncontrolled hypertension.

Keywords

hyperperfusion, reperfusion of ischemic brain tissue, inflammatory response, blood flow, leukocyte adhesion, leukocyte infiltration, free radical release, neuronal membrane breakdown, reperfusion injury in stroke, hemorrhagic transformation

 
Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Anne Tillinghast for her assistance in preparing this manuscript.

We would like to extend a special thanks to our esteemed colleague Reed Murtagh M.D. who provided the MRI images.



More on Reperfusion Injury in Stroke

References

References

  1. Sundt TM Jr, Sharbrough FW, Piepgras DG, Kearns TP, Messick JM Jr, O'Fallon WM. Correlation of cerebral blood flow and electroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomy: with results of surgery and hemodynamics of cerebral ischemia. Mayo Clin Proc. Sep 1981;56(9):533-43. [Medline].

  2. Karapanayiotides T, Meuli R, Devuyst G, Piechowski-Jozwiak B, Dewarrat A, Ruchat P. Postcarotid endarterectomy hyperperfusion or reperfusion syndrome. Stroke. Jan 2005;36(1):21-6. [Medline].

  3. Piepgras DG, Morgan MK, Sundt TM Jr, Yanagihara T, Mussman LM. Intracerebral hemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg. Apr 1988;68(4):532-6. [Medline].

  4. Coutts SB, Hill MD, Hu WY. Hyperperfusion syndrome: toward a stricter definition. Neurosurgery. Nov 2003;53(5):1053-58; discussion 1058-60. [Medline].

  5. Tehindrazanarivelo AD, Lutz G, PetitJean C, Bousser MG. Headache following carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study. Cephalalgia. Dec 1992;12(6):380-2. [Medline].

  6. Adhiyaman V, Alexander S. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid endarterectomy. QJM. Apr 2007;100(4):239-44. [Medline].

  7. Abou-Chebl A, Yadav JS, Reginelli JP, Bajzer C, Bhatt D, Krieger DW. Intracranial hemorrhage and hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid artery stenting: risk factors, prevention, and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. May 5 2004;43(9):1596-601. [Medline].

  8. McCabe DJ, Brown MM, Clifton A. Fatal cerebral reperfusion hemorrhage after carotid stenting. Stroke. Nov 1999;30(11):2483-6. [Medline].

  9. Anna Finley Caulfield MD, Christine AC Wijman, MD. Crit Critical Care of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Crit Care Clin. 2007;22:581–606.

  10. Warach S, Latour LL. Evidence of reperfusion injury, exacerbated by thrombolytic therapy, in human focal brain ischemia using a novel imaging marker of early blood-brain barrier disruption. Stroke. Nov 2004;35(11 Suppl 1):2659-61. [Medline].

  11. Strandgaard S, Paulson OB. Cerebral autoregulation. Stroke. 1983;15:413-16.

  12. Sekhon LH, Morgan MK, Spence I. Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough: the role of capillaries. J Neurosurg. Mar 1997;86(3):519-24. [Medline].

  13. Hosoda K, Kawaguchi T, Shibata Y, Kamei M, Kidoguchi K, Koyama J. Cerebral vasoreactivity and internal carotid artery flow help to identify patients at risk for hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. Jul 2001;32(7):1567-73. [Medline].

  14. Ogasawara K, Inoue T, Kobayashi M, Endo H, Fukuda T, Ogawa A. Pretreatment with the free radical scavenger edaravone prevents cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy. Neurosurgery. Nov 2004;55(5):1060-7. [Medline].

  15. Khatri P, Wechsler LR, Broderick JP. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with revascularization therapies. Stroke. Feb 2007;38(2):431-40. [Medline].

  16. Abciximab Emergent Stroke Treatment Trial (AbESTT) Investigators. Emergency administration of abciximab for treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke: results of a randomized phase 2 trial. Stroke. Apr 2005;36(4):880-90. [Medline].

  17. Intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous t-PA therapy for ischemic stroke. The NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. Nov 1997;28(11):2109-18. [Medline].

  18. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet. Oct 17 1998;352(9136):1245-51. [Medline].

  19. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. May 31 1997;349(9065):1569-81. [Medline].

  20. Bath PM, Lindenstrom E, Boysen G, et al. Tinzaparin in acute ischaemic stroke (TAIST): a randomised aspirin-controlled trial. Lancet. Sep 1 2001;358(9283):702-10. [Medline].

  21. The Publications Committee for the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Investigators. Low molecular weight heparinoid, ORG 10172 (danaparoid), and outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. The Publications Committee for the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Investigators. JAMA. Apr 22-29 1998;279(16):1265-72. [Medline].

  22. Cikrit DF, Burt RW, Dalsing MC, et al. Acetazolamide enhanced single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) evaluation of cerebral perfusion before and after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. May 1992;15(5):747-53; discussion 753-4. [Medline].

  23. Yoshimoto T, Shirasaka T, Yoshizumi T, Fujimoto S, Kaneko S, Kashiwaba T. Evaluation of carotid distal pressure for prevention of hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy. Surg Neurol. Jun 2005;63(6):554-7; discussion 557-8. [Medline].

  24. Jansen C, Sprengers AM, Moll FL, Vermeulen FE, Hamerlijnck RP, van Gijn J. Prediction of intracerebral haemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy by clinical criteria and intraoperative transcranial Doppler monitoring: results of 233 operations. Eur J Vasc Surg. Mar 1994;8(2):220-5. [Medline].

  25. Wagner WH, Cossman DV, Farber A, Levin PM, Cohen JL. Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg. Jul 2005;19(4):479-86. [Medline].

  26. Naylor AR, Evans J, Thompson MM, London NJ, Abbott RJ, Cherryman G. Seizures after carotid endarterectomy: hyperperfusion, dysautoregulation or hypertensive encephalopathy?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. Jul 2003;26(1):39-44. [Medline].

  27. [Guideline] Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke. May 2007;38(5):1655-711. [Medline].

  28. [Guideline] Broderick J, Connolly S, Feldmann E, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Stroke. Jun 2007;38(6):2001-23. [Medline].

  29. Clark WM, Albers GW, Madden KP, Hamilton S. The rtPA (alteplase) 0- to 6-hour acute stroke trial, part A (A0276g) : results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Thromblytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke study investigators. Stroke. Apr 2000;31(4):811-6. [Medline].

  30. Larrue V, von Kummer R R, Muller A, Bluhmki E. Risk factors for severe hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a secondary analysis of the European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study (ECASS II). Stroke. Feb 2001;32(2):438-41. [Medline].

  31. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study G. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med. Dec 14 1995;333(24):1581-7. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

hyperperfusion, reperfusion of ischemic brain tissue, inflammatory response, blood flow, leukocyte adhesion, leukocyte infiltration, free radical release, neuronal membrane breakdown, reperfusion injury in stroke, hemorrhagic transformation

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Hoda Elzawahry, MD, Resident Physician, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida College of Medicine
Hoda Elzawahry, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Pedro E Hernandez-Frau, MD, Resident Physician, Department of Neurology, University South Florida and Tampa General Hospital
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Reza Behrouz, DO, Assistant Professor of Vascular and Critical Care Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida College of Medicine; Co-Director, Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit, Tampa General Hospital
Reza Behrouz, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American College of Physicians, Neurocritical Care Society, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society of Critical Care Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Wayne M Clark, MD, Director of Oregon Stroke Center, Professor, Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University
Wayne M Clark, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Neurology, American Medical Association, American Neurological Association, American Society of Neuroimaging, National Stroke Association, and Oregon Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Richard M Zweifler, MD, Chief of Neurology, Sentara Healthcare, Norfolk, VA; Professor of Neurology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
Richard M Zweifler, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Stroke Association, Royal Society of Medicine, and Stroke Council of the American Heart Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Howard S Kirshner, MD, Professor of Neurology, Psychiatry and Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vice Chairman, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Director, Vanderbilt Stroke Center; Program Director, Stroke Service, Vanderbilt Stallworth Rehabilitation Hospital; Consulting Staff, Department of Neurology, Nashville Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Howard S Kirshner, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Neurology, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Neurological Association, American Society of Neurorehabilitation, National Stroke Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Tennessee Medical Association
Disclosure: Boehringer Ingelheim Honoraria Speaking and teaching; BMS/Sanofi Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Novartis Honoraria Speaking and teaching

CME Editor

Matthew J Baker, MD, Consulting Staff, Collier Neurologic Specialists, Naples Community Hospital
Matthew J Baker, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Helmi L Lutsep, MD, Professor, Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University; Associate Director, Oregon Stroke Center
Helmi L Lutsep, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology and American Stroke Association
Disclosure: Co-Axia Consulting fee Review panel membership; Talecris Consulting fee Review panel membership; AGA Medical Consulting fee Review panel membership; Boehringer Ingelheim Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Concentric Medical Consulting fee Review panel membership; Abbott Consulting fee Consulting; Sanofi  Consulting

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.