Adrenal Adenoma Workup

  • Author: George T Griffing, MD; Chief Editor: George T Griffing, MD   more...
 
Updated: Sep 22, 2011
 

Approach Considerations

Adrenal insufficiency should be the first consideration, especially with bilateral adrenal masses (AMs). A corticotropin test with 60-minute cortisol levels helps rule out the diagnosis. If found, suspect granulomatous disease, hemorrhage, or lymphoma. A 21-hydroxylase deficiency can also be diagnosed with a 60-minute post-corticotropin plasma 17-hydroxyprogesterone level.

The diagnosis should be confirmed with a second test. According to guidelines issued by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) in 2009 for the management of adrenal incidentalomas, a 2-day low-dose dexamethasone suppression test is a suitable second test.[10] Other possible tests include a urinary free cortisol test, a urinary metanephrine–to–creatinine ratio, or a renin-to-aldosterone ratio. If a hormonal excess is found, surgical removal is usually indicated.

If no hormonal excess is found and the corticotropin test results were unremarkable, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) helps distinguish between adrenal and metastatic disease.

Adrenal cortical adenoma can be diagnosed with a high degree of accuracy: the specificity of imaging studies ranges from 95-99%, and the sensitivity is greater than 90%. These impressive percentages are a result of the relatively high prevalence of adrenal adenomas in the general population and the extensive radiologic research with imaging methods, primarily computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

The adrenal gland is the fourth most common site of metastasis, and adrenal metastases may be found in as many as 25% of patients with known primary lesions. Therefore, radiologists frequently face the task of determining whether an AM is benign or malignant. The question can directly affect the clinical management of the case. For instance, the workup for an otherwise resectable lung cancer may reveal the presence of an adrenal mass and suggest the possibility of metastatic disease.

A study by Schmitz et al concluded that using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis to measure microRNA (miRNA) expression of miR-675 and miR-335 helps to differentiate adrenocortical carcinomas from adrenocortical adenomas.[11]

Next

Biochemical Testing

If clinical evidence manifests, perform diagnostic hormonal testing (see Table 2). Because adrenal adenomas (AAs) may be hormonally silent, biochemical screening is warranted.

Table 2. Evaluation of AM Syndromes (Open Table in a new window)

Diagnosis Features Biochemical Tests
PheochromocytomaHigh blood pressure, catechol symptomsUrine-free and plasma-free metanephrines
Primary aldosteronismHigh blood pressure, low K+, low PRA*Plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio
Adrenocortical carcinomaVirilization or feminizationUrine 17-ketosteroids
Cushing or "silent" Cushing syndromeCushing symptoms or normal examination resultsOvernight 1-mg dexamethasone test
*Plasma renin activity

Cushing syndrome

Most frequently, cortisol produces subclinical Cushing syndrome. This occurs when the AA autonomously secretes cortisol at levels high enough to suppress corticotropin but too low to produce Cushing stigmata.

Patients do not have increased rates of hypertension or diabetes mellitus, but they may have features of metabolic syndrome, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and impaired glucose tolerance. Patients may have reduced bone density and osteoporosis.

Because urinary free cortisol levels may be within the reference range, a 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test is needed to diagnose subclinical Cushing syndrome.

Pheochromocytoma

Pheochromocytomas should be considered in all AA cases because they are more common than previously thought, the diagnosis is often overlooked, and a failure to recognize them may lead to patient death. AACE/AAES 2009 guidelines recommend this diagnosis be confirmed by a measurement of plasma fractionated metanephrines and normetanephrines or 24-hour total urinary metanephrines and fractionated catecholamines (or both plasma and urine studies).[10]

Assume all AAs have a pheochromocytoma until proven otherwise, especially when paroxysmal hyperadrenergic symptoms are present.

Exclude the presence of pheochromocytoma prior to performing a fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy on the AM.

Primary hyperaldosteronism

Primary hyperaldosteronism is a less compelling, but nevertheless important, diagnosis. The test of choice is an upright plasma aldosterone–to–renin ratio. A plasma aldosterone concentration–to–plasma renin activity ratio greater than 30 and a plasma aldosterone concentration of greater than 0.5 nmol/L (18 ng/dL) are suggestive of primary aldosteronism.

Hyperaldosteronism is usually identified by suppressed upright plasma renin levels and concomitant elevated plasma aldosterone levels.

Abnormalities of other secreted hormones

Other secreted hormones can include estrogens, androgens, and 17-hydroxyprogesterone. They are associated with AAs, carcinomas, and hyperplasia. They often manifest clinically and therefore do not require presumptive screening.

Bilateral adrenal masses

Bilateral AMs should always raise the possibility of hemorrhage, especially in patients with coagulopathies or those on anticoagulant therapy. Clinical symptoms include flank pain, nausea and vomiting, fever, and hypotension. Diagnosis can be made with a rapid corticotropin stimulation test demonstrating decreased cortisol reserve.

Bilateral AMs usually suggest certain systemic diseases that can produce adrenal insufficiency. They should be recognized early. Fungal or tuberculosis infection may be present. Granulomatous diseases (eg, histoplasmosis, tuberculosis) are characteristically homogeneous and may show calcifications.

In a patient with primary hyperaldosteronism, bilateral adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) suggest bilateral adrenal hyperaldosteronism (idiopathic hyperaldosteronism). Confirm this by adrenal venous sampling to demonstrate bilateral plasma aldosterone secretion. Long-standing, corticotropin-dependent Cushing syndrome may result in large AMs.

A 21-hydroxylase deficiency can produce unilateral AMs, but bilateral AMs are more common. To recognize this, measure the level of corticotropin-stimulated plasma 17-hydroxyprogesterone.

Most metastatic disease to the adrenal gland is unilateral, but lymphoma may be bilateral and can cause adrenal insufficiency.

Previous
Next

Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Other Modalities

The presence of intracytoplasmic lipid is fairly specific for adrenal cortical adenomas: approximately 70% of all adrenal cortical adenomas have a high percentage of intracytoplasmic lipid, whereas the remaining 30% do not. Other processes, such as metastasis, hemorrhage, and other primary adrenal neoplasms, have distinctly different imaging characteristics.

This unique characteristic allows clinicians to distinguish adenomas from other processes that affect the adrenal gland, by using imaging techniques that demonstrate lipid. The major exception is clear cell carcinoma of the kidney, which contains an abundance of intracytoplasmic lipid; when these metastasize to the adrenal gland, their appearance can be identical to that of a lipid-rich adenoma. Note that on CT scans and MRIs, the appearance of intracytoplasmic lipid is different from that of macroscopic fat, as in the case of a myelolipoma.

The modalities of choice in the evaluation of an adrenal mass are CT, MRI, and positron emission tomography (PET). CT scanning is preferred because it is more cost-effective than MRI to delineate size, shape, and appearance. MRI is as effective as CT scanning for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions and is superior for detecting pheochromocytomas. A benign adenoma has a T2-weighted intensity similar to liver tissue.

To see complete information on Imaging in Adrenal Adenoma, please go to the main article by clicking here.

Mass size is an important predictive characteristic. A smooth homogeneous lesion smaller than 4 cm with a low attenuation value (Hounsfield units) is usually benign. A larger inhomogeneous lesion with irregular borders and a higher attenuation score should be considered for malignancy.

The cutoff criterion for suspicion of malignancy ranges from 3-6 cm in diameter. The best hope for a surgical cure is a lower cutoff, but this means a greater number of benign tumors are unnecessarily removed. A 4-cm cutoff is estimated to result in an acceptable ratio of 1 cancerous to 8 benign tumors, as in the image below.[12]

Characteristics of adrenal masses and their malignCharacteristics of adrenal masses and their malignant potential.

Plain radiography, tomography, and ultrasonography are less sensitive and are used less frequently since the advent of CT scanning and MRI. Ultrasonography has a role in the evaluation of a potential AM in infants, but no appearance is specific for benign adrenal adenoma.[13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23]

Other scanning techniques include iodine-131 metaiodobenzyl guanidine for pheochromocytoma and iodine-131-6-b-iodomethylnorcholesterol (NP-59 cholesterol) for adrenocortical lesions; however, these tests are not widely available, and data on their clinical usefulness is insufficient.

A prospective cohort study of adrenal incidentalomas in an unselected population undergoing radiological examination by Muth et al found that 6.6% of patients with adrenal incidentalomas had surgery, and benign hormone-producing tumors were found in 3.1%.[24] Repeated CT scanning and hormone evaluation after 2 years resulted in no significant increase in the sensitivity for diagnosis of malignant or hormone producing tumors.

Imaging features of pheochromocytomas

Pheochromocytomas vary in size, consistency, and margins. They can be bilateral; they are strongly enhanced with contrast; and they show high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, owing to their vascularity.

Imaging features of adrenal carcinomas

Adrenal carcinomas are often larger than 6 cm in diameter, with an irregular margin. They are unilateral, sometimes with local invasion and lymphadenopathy and metastases. Adrenal carcinomas demonstrate a soft-tissue inhomogeneous density on CT scans, which enhances with contrast. They have an intermediate increased intensity on T2-weighted MRIs. Myelolipomas show characteristic images of fat. Hemorrhage shows characteristic images of blood.

To see complete information on Imaging in Adrenal Adenoma, please go to the main article by clicking here.

Previous
Next

Fine-Needle Aspiration

Adrenal FNA helps identify metastatic, systemic, and hemorrhagic disease of the adrenal glands. It cannot distinguish between benign and malignant primary adrenal tumors and should be used only when AMs cannot be diagnosed clinically or hormonally.

Use CT scanning to guide a 23- or 25-gauge needle into the left or right adrenal gland. If a metastatic lesion is found, initiate a search for the primary cancer. If adrenal tissue is found, consider surgical removal. Pheochromocytoma should always be excluded before performing FNA biopsy to avoid the potential for a hypertensive crisis.

In a study on the sensitivity of percutaneous adrenal biopsy in the detection of malignant adrenal neoplasms, Mazzaglia and Monchik concluded that such biopsies are not diagnostically useful in patients with isolated AIs.[25] Reporting on 163 adrenal biopsies, including 30 performed on isolated AIs, the investigators found the negative predictive value of percutaneous biopsy to be too low for use in ruling out malignancy in isolated AIs. The results also indicated that biopsy is valuable for diagnosing metastatic carcinoma in cases of nonadrenal primary malignancy.

Histologic findings are based on the AM cell type.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

George T Griffing, MD  Professor of Medicine, St Louis University School of Medicine

George T Griffing, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Medical Practice Executives, American College of Physician Executives, American College of Physicians, American Diabetes Association, American Federation for Medical Research, American Heart Association, Central Society for Clinical Research, Endocrine Society, International Society for Clinical Densitometry, and Southern Society for Clinical Investigation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Perry J Horwich, MD  Staff Physician, Instructor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel - Deaconess Medical Center

Perry J Horwich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Stephen A Okon, MD  Consulting Staff, Assistant Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center

Stephen A Okon, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association and American Roentgen Ray Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Stanley Wallach, MD  Executive Director, American College of Nutrition; Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine

Stanley Wallach, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nutrition, American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, American Society for Clinical Investigation, American Society for Clinical Nutrition, American Society for Nutritional Sciences, Association of American Physicians, and Endocrine Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Don S Schalch, MD  Professor Emeritus, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics

Don S Schalch, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Diabetes Association, American Federation for Medical Research, Central Society for Clinical Research, and Endocrine Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mark Cooper, MBBS, PhD, FRACP  Head, Diabetes & Metabolism Division, Baker Heart Research Institute, Professor of Medicine, Monash University

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

George T Griffing, MD  Professor of Medicine, St Louis University School of Medicine

George T Griffing, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Medical Practice Executives, American College of Physician Executives, American College of Physicians, American Diabetes Association, American Federation for Medical Research, American Heart Association, Central Society for Clinical Research, Endocrine Society, International Society for Clinical Densitometry, and Southern Society for Clinical Investigation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Terzolo M, Bovio S, Pia A, Reimondo G, Angeli A. Management of adrenal incidentaloma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. Apr 2009;23(2):233-43. [Medline].

  2. Yener S, Ertilav S, Secil M, Demir T, Akinci B, Kebapcilar L, et al. Prospective evaluation of tumor size and hormonal status in adrenal incidentalomas. J Endocrinol Invest. Jan 2010;33(1):32-6. [Medline].

  3. Kokko JP, Brown TC, Berman MM. Adrenal adenoma and hypertension. Lancet. Mar 4 1967;1(7488):468-70. [Medline].

  4. Glazer HS, Weyman PJ, Sagel SS, Levitt RG, McClennan BL. Nonfunctioning adrenal masses: incidental discovery on computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 1982;139(1):81-5. [Medline].

  5. Abecassis M, McLoughlin MJ, Langer B, Kudlow JE. Serendipitous adrenal masses: prevalence, significance, and management. Am J Surg. Jun 1985;149(6):783-8. [Medline].

  6. Belldegrun A, Hussain S, Seltzer SE, Loughlin KR, Gittes RF, Richie JP. Incidentally discovered mass of the adrenal gland. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Sep 1986;163(3):203-8. [Medline].

  7. Herrera MF, Grant CS, van Heerden JA, Sheedy PF, Ilstrup DM. Incidentally discovered adrenal tumors: an institutional perspective. Surgery. Dec 1991;110(6):1014-21. [Medline].

  8. Bovio S, Cataldi A, Reimondo G, Sperone P, Novello S, Berruti A, et al. Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest. Apr 2006;29(4):298-302. [Medline].

  9. Sutton MG, Sheps SG, Lie JT. Prevalence of clinically unsuspected pheochromocytoma. Review of a 50-year autopsy series. Mayo Clin Proc. Jun 1981;56(6):354-60. [Medline].

  10. [Guideline] Zeiger MA, Thompson GB, Duh QY, Hamrahian AH, Angelos P, Elaraj D, et al. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons medical guidelines for the management of adrenal incidentalomas. Endocr Pract. Jul-Aug 2009;15 Suppl 1:1-20. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  11. Schmitz KJ, Helwig J, Bertram S, et al. Differential expression of microRNA-675, microRNA-139-3p and microRNA-335 in benign and malignant adrenocortical tumours. J Clin Pathol. Jun 2011;64(6):529-35. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  12. Bin X, Qing Y, Linhui W, Li G, Yinghao S. Adrenal incidentalomas: Experience from a retrospective study in a Chinese population. Urol Oncol. May 29 2009;[Medline].

  13. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, McNicholas MM, Mueller PR. Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 1998;171(1):201-4. [Medline].

  14. Ho LM, Paulson EK, Brady MJ, Wong TZ, Schindera ST. Lipid-poor adenomas on unenhanced CT: does histogram analysis increase sensitivity compared with a mean attenuation threshold?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 2008;191(1):234-8. [Medline].

  15. Halefoglu AM, Bas N, Yasar A, Basak M. Differentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using CT histogram analysis method: a prospective study. Eur J Radiol. Mar 2010;73(3):643-51. [Medline].

  16. Krestin GP, Steinbrich W, Friedmann G. Adrenal masses: evaluation with fast gradient-echo MR imaging and Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic studies. Radiology. Jun 1989;171(3):675-80. [Medline].

  17. Khati NJ, Javitt MC, Schwartz AM. Adrenal adenoma and hematoma mimicking a collision tumor at MR imaging. Radiographics. Jan-Feb 1999;19(1):235-9. [Medline].

  18. Yoh T, Hosono M, Komeya Y, Im SW, Ashikaga R, Shimono T, et al. Quantitative evaluation of norcholesterol scintigraphy, CT attenuation value, and chemical-shift MR imaging for characterizing adrenal adenomas. Ann Nucl Med. Jul 2008;22(6):513-9. [Medline].

  19. Korobkin M. CT characterization of adrenal masses: the time has come. Radiology. Dec 2000;217(3):629-32. [Medline].

  20. Liang HL, Pan HB, Lee YH, Huang JS, Wu TD, Chang CT, et al. Small functional adrenal cortical adenoma: treatment with CT-guided percutaneous acetic acid injection--report of three cases. Radiology. Nov 1999;213(2):612-5. [Medline].

  21. Mayo-Smith WW, Boland GW, Noto RB, Lee MJ. State-of-the-art adrenal imaging. Radiographics. Jul-Aug 2001;21(4):995-1012. [Medline].

  22. Otal P, Escourrou G, Mazerolles C, Janne d'Othee B, Mezghani S, Musso S, et al. Imaging features of uncommon adrenal masses with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics. May-Jun 1999;19(3):569-81. [Medline].

  23. Boland GW, Blake MA, Hahn PF, Mayo-Smith WW. Incidental adrenal lesions: principles, techniques, and algorithms for imaging characterization. Radiology. Dec 2008;249(3):756-75. [Medline].

  24. Muth A, Hammarstedt L, Hellstrom M, et al. Cohort study of patients with adrenal lesions discovered incidentally. Br J Surg. Oct 2011;98(10):1383-1391. [Medline].

  25. Mazzaglia PJ, Monchik JM. Limited value of adrenal biopsy in the evaluation of adrenal neoplasm: a decade of experience. Arch Surg. May 2009;144(5):465-70. [Medline].

  26. Zeiger MA, Siegelman SS, Hamrahian AH. Medical and surgical evaluation and treatment of adrenal incidentalomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jul 2011;96(7):2004-15. [Medline].

  27. Leboulleux S, Deandreis D, Escourrou C, et al. Fluorodesoxyglucose uptake in the remaining adrenal glands during the follow-up of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma: do not consider it as malignancy. Eur J Endocrinol. Jan 2011;164(1):89-94. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Characteristics of adrenal masses and their malignant potential.
Differential diagnosis of adrenal mass
Pituitary-adrenal axis and cortisol-secreting adrenal mass.
Adrenal incidentaloma and disease type.
Left adrenal mass discovered incidentally.
Close-up of the left adrenal incidentaloma from the above image.
Homogeneous, well-defined, 7-HU ovoid mass is seen in the right adrenal gland; this finding is diagnostic of a benign adrenal adenoma.
Homogeneously enhancing ovoid mass is seen in the left adrenal gland.
Table 1. Prevalence of AMs
Author Method Sample Size Prevalence, %
Russl (1941)Autopsy (>1 cm)131/90001.5
Kokko (1967)[3] Autopsy (>5 mm)21/14951.5
Hedeland (1967)Autopsy (>2 mm)64/7398.7
Glazer (1982)[4] CT scan16/22000.7
Abecassis (1985)[5] CT scan19/14591.3
Belldegrun (1986)[6] CT scan88/120000.7
Herrera (1991)[7] CT scan259/610540.4
Table 2. Evaluation of AM Syndromes
Diagnosis Features Biochemical Tests
PheochromocytomaHigh blood pressure, catechol symptomsUrine-free and plasma-free metanephrines
Primary aldosteronismHigh blood pressure, low K+, low PRA*Plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio
Adrenocortical carcinomaVirilization or feminizationUrine 17-ketosteroids
Cushing or "silent" Cushing syndromeCushing symptoms or normal examination resultsOvernight 1-mg dexamethasone test
*Plasma renin activity
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.