Myasthenia Gravis Clinical Presentation
- Author: William D Goldenberg, MD; Chief Editor: Nicholas Lorenzo, MD more...
History
The presentation and progression of myasthenia gravis (MG) vary. The usual initial complaint is a specific muscle weakness rather than generalized muscle weakness. The severity of the weakness typically fluctuates over hours being least severe in the morning and worse as the day progresses; it is increased by exertion and alleviated by rest. The degree of weakness also varies over the course of weeks or months, with exacerbations and remissions.
Extraocular muscle weakness or ptosis is present initially in 50% of patients and occurs during the course of illness in 90%. Bulbar muscle weakness is also common, along with weakness of head extension and flexion. Weakness may involve limb musculature with a myopathylike proximal weakness that is greater than the distal muscle weakness. Isolated limb muscle weakness as the presenting symptom is rare and occurs in fewer than 10% of patients.
Patients progress from mild to more severe disease over weeks to months. Weakness tends to spread from the ocular to facial to bulbar muscles and then to truncal and limb muscles.[11] On the other hand, symptoms may remain limited to the extraocular and eyelid muscles for years. Rarely, patients with severe, generalized weakness may not have associated ocular muscle weakness.
The disease remains exclusively ocular in only 16% of patients. About 87% of patients have generalized disease within 13 months after onset. In patients with generalized disease, the interval from onset to maximal weakness is less than 36 months in 83% of patients.
Exposure to bright sunlight, surgery, immunization, emotional stress, menstruation, and physical factors might trigger or worsen exacerbations. Intercurrent illness (eg, viral infection) or medication can exacerbate weakness, quickly precipitating a myasthenic crisis and rapid respiratory compromise.
Spontaneous remissions are rare. Long and complete remissions are even less common. Most remissions with treatment occur during the first 3 years of disease.
MGFA classification of myasthenia gravis
In May 1997, the Medical Scientific Advisory Board (MSAB) of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) formed a task force to address the need for universally accepted classifications, grading systems, and analytic methods for management of patients undergoing therapy and for use in therapeutic research trials. As a result, the MGFA Clinical Classification was created.[12] This classification divides MG into 5 main classes and several subclasses, as follows.
Class I MG is characterized by the following:
- Any ocular muscle weakness
- May have weakness of eye closure
- All other muscle strength is normal
Class II MG is characterized by the following:
- Mild weakness affecting other than ocular muscles
- May also have ocular muscle weakness of any severity
Class IIa MG is characterized by the following:
- Predominantly affecting limb, axial muscles, or both
- May also have lesser involvement of oropharyngeal muscles
Class IIb MG is characterized by the following:
- Predominantly affecting oropharyngeal, respiratory muscles, or both
- May also have lesser or equal involvement of limb, axial muscles, or both
Class III MG is characterized by the following:
- Moderate weakness affecting other than ocular muscles
- May also have ocular muscle weakness of any severity
Class IIIa MG is characterized by the following:
- Predominantly affecting limb, axial muscles, or both
- May also have lesser involvement of oropharyngeal muscles
Class IIIb MG is characterized by the following:
- Predominantly affecting oropharyngeal, respiratory muscles, or both
- May also have lesser or equal involvement of limb, axial muscles, or both
Class IV MG is characterized by the following:
- Severe weakness affecting other than ocular muscles
- May also have ocular muscle weakness of any severity
Class IVa MG is characterized by the following:
- Predominantly affecting limb, axial muscles, or both
- May also have lesser involvement of oropharyngeal muscles
Class IVb MG is characterized by the following:
- Predominantly affecting oropharyngeal, respiratory muscles, or both
- May also have lesser or equal involvement of limb, axial muscles, or both
Class V MG is characterized by the following:
- Defined by intubation, with or without mechanical ventilation, except when used during routine postoperative management
- Use of a feeding tube without intubation places the patient in class IVb
Physical Examination
Patients with MG can present with a wide range of signs and symptoms, depending on the severity of the disease.
Mild presentations may be associated with only subtle findings, such as ptosis, that are limited to bulbar muscles. Findings may not be apparent unless muscle weakness is provoked by repetitive or sustained use of the muscles involved. Recovery of strength is seen after a period of rest or with application of ice to the affected muscle. Conversely, increased ambient or core temperature may worsen muscle weakness.
Variability in weakness can be significant, and clearly demonstrable findings may be absent during examination. This may result in misdiagnosis (eg, functional disorder). The physician must determine strength carefully in various muscles and muscle groups to document severity and extent of the disease and to monitor the benefit of treatment.
Another important aspect of the physical examination is to recognize a patient in whom imminent respiratory failure is imminent. Difficulty breathing necessitates urgent or emergent evaluation and treatment.
Weakness can be present in a variety of different muscles and is usually proximal and symmetric. Sensory examination and deep tendon reflexes are normal.
Weakness of the facial muscles is almost always present. Bilateral facial muscle weakness produces a masklike face with ptosis and a horizontal smile. The eyebrows are furrowed to compensate for ptosis, and the sclerae below the limbi may be exposed secondary to weak lower lids. Mild proptosis attributable to extraocular muscle weakness also may be present.
Weakness of palatal muscles can result in a nasal twang to the voice and nasal regurgitation of food (especially liquids). Chewing may become difficult. Severe jaw weakness may cause the jaw to hang open (the patient may sit with a hand on the chin for support). Swallowing may become difficult, and aspiration may occur with fluids, giving rise to coughing or choking while drinking. Weakness of neck muscles is common, and neck flexors are usually affected more severely than neck extensors are.
Certain limb muscles are involved more commonly than others (eg, upper limb muscles are more likely to be involved than lower limb muscles). In the upper limbs, deltoids and extensors of the wrist and fingers are affected most. The triceps is more likely to be affected than the biceps. In the lower extremities, commonly involved muscles include hip flexors, quadriceps, and hamstrings, with involvement of foot dorsiflexors or plantar flexors less common.
Respiratory muscle weakness that produces acute respiratory failure is a true neuromuscular emergency, and immediate intubation may be necessary. Weakness of the intercostal muscles and the diaphragm may result in carbon dioxide retention as a result of hypoventilation. Respiratory failure usually occurs around the time of surgery (eg, after thymectomy) or during later stages of the disease. However, it can be a presenting feature in about 14-18% of patients with MG.[13]
Weak pharyngeal muscles may collapse the upper airway. Careful monitoring of respiratory status is necessary in the acute phase of MG. Negative inspiratory force, vital capacity, and tidal volume must be monitored carefully. Relying on pulse oximetry to monitor respiratory status can be dangerous. During the initial phase of neuromuscular hypoventilation, carbon dioxide is retained but arterial blood oxygenation is maintained. This can lull the physician into a false sense of security regarding a patient’s respiratory status.
Typically, extraocular muscle weakness is asymmetric. The weakness usually affects more than 1 extraocular muscle and is not limited to muscles innervated by a single cranial nerve; this is an important diagnostic clue. The weakness of lateral and medial recti may produce a pseudointernuclear ophthalmoplegia, described as limited adduction of 1 eye, with nystagmus of the abducting eye on attempted lateral gaze. The nystagmus becomes coarser on sustained lateral gaze as the medial rectus of the abducting eye fatigues.
Eyelid weakness results in ptosis. Patients may furrow their foreheads, using the frontalis muscle to compensate for this weakness. A sustained upward gaze exacerbates the ptosis; closing the eyes for a short period alleviates it.
Evidence of coexisting autoimmune diseases
MG is an autoimmune disorder, and other autoimmune diseases are known to occur more frequently in patients with MG than in the general population. Some autoimmune diseases that occur at higher frequency in MG patients are hyperthyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, and lupus.
A thorough skin and joint examination may help diagnose any of these coexisting diseases. Tachycardia or exophthalmos point to possible hyperthyroidism, which may be present in up to 10-15% of patients with MG. This is important because in patients with hyperthyroidism, weakness may not improve if only the MG is treated.
Complications
Systemically, myasthenic crisis is the most dreadful complication. Aspiration pneumonia also may occur as a consequence of poor oropharyngeal muscle function. Cholinergic crisis may follow excessive treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors.
The most common severe complication of MG is respiratory failure, which often presents with the rapid deterioration of respiratory effort that ultimately results in apnea.
Pneumonia is a common complication in patients with MG and often is the cause of death in fatal cases. Community-acquired pneumonia often is more severe in patients with MG because of their marginal respiratory function, inability to cough effectively, and inability to maintain tachypnea for long periods.
Other types of pneumonia are more common in patients with MG because these patients have a higher risk of aspiration. MG patients are also in a relatively immunocompromised state because of immunosuppressive medications. Consequently, they are at risk for aspiration pneumonia with mixed aerobic and anaerobic organisms, as well as organisms associated with immunocompromise (eg, Pseudomonas, other gram-negative organisms, and fungi).
Hypoxemia and respiratory acidosis often render the patient somnolent or unresponsive, in which case a clear history may be difficult to obtain.
Grob D, Brunner N, Namba T, Pagala M. Lifetime course of myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. Feb 2008;37(2):141-9. [Medline].
Strauss AJL, Seigal BC, Hsu KC. Immunofluorescence demonstration of a muscle binding complement fixing serum globulin fraction in Myasthenia Gravis. Proc Soc Exp Biol. 1960;105:184.
Patric J, Lindstrom JM. Autoimmune response to acetylcholine receptor. Science. 1973;180:871.
Bershad EM, Feen ES, Suarez JI. Myasthenia gravis crisis. South Med J. Jan 2008;101(1):63-9. [Medline].
Evoli A, Tonali PA, Padua L. Clinical correlates with anti-MuSK antibodies in generalized seronegative myasthenia gravis. Brain. Oct 2003;126(Pt 10):2304-11. [Medline].
Sanders DB, Howard JF, Massey JM. Seronegative myasthenia gravis. Ann Neurol. 1987;22:126.
[Best Evidence] Gajdos P, Chevret S, Toyka K. Intravenous immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jan 23 2008;CD002277. [Medline].
Martignago S, Fanin M, Albertini E, Pegoraro E, Angelini C. Muscle histopathology in myasthenia gravis with antibodies against MuSK and AChR. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. Feb 2009;35(1):103-10. [Medline].
Keesey JC. Clinical evaluation and management of myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. Apr 2004;29(4):484-505. [Medline].
Oh SJ, Dhall R, Young A, Morgan MB, Lu L, Claussen GC. Statins may aggravate myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. Sep 2008;38(3):1101-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Engel AG. Acquired autoimmune myasthenia gravis. In: Engel AG, Franzini-Armstrong C, eds. Myology: Basic and Clinical. 2nd ed. 1994;1769-1797.
Jaretzki A, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM. Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. Neurology. Jul 12 2000;55(1):16-23. [Medline].
Qureshi AI, Choundry MA, Mohammad Y, Chua HC, Yahia AM, Ulatowski JA, et al. Respiratory failure as a first presentation of myasthenia gravis. Med Sci Monit. Dec 2004;10(12):CR684-9. [Medline].
Padua L, Stalberg E, LoMonaco M, Evoli A, Batocchi A, Tonali P. SFEMG in ocular myasthenia gravis diagnosis. Clin Neurophysiol. Jul 2000;111(7):1203-7. [Medline].
Tindall RS. Humoral immunity in myasthenia gravis: biochemical characterization of acquired antireceptor antibodies and clinical correlations. Ann Neurol. Nov 1981;10(5):437-47. [Medline].
Hoch W, McConville J, Helms S, Newsom-Davis J, Melms A, Vincent A. Auto-antibodies to the receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK in patients with myasthenia gravis without acetylcholine receptor antibodies. Nat Med. Mar 2001;7(3):365-8. [Medline].
Stickler DE, Massey JM, Sanders DB. MuSK-antibody positive myasthenia gravis: clinical and electrodiagnostic patterns. Clin Neurophysiol. Sep 2005;116(9):2065-8. [Medline].
Pasnoor M, Wolfe GI, Nations S, Trivedi J, Barohn RJ, Herbelin L, et al. Clinical findings in MuSK-antibody positive myasthenia gravis: a U.S. experience. Muscle Nerve. Mar 2010;41(3):370-4. [Medline].
Sanders DB, El-Salem K, Massey JM, et al. Clinical aspects of MuSK antibody positive seronegative MG. Neurology. Jun 24 2003;60(12):1978-80. [Medline].
Romi F, Skeie GO, Gilhus NE. Striational antibodies in myasthenia gravis: reactivity and possible clinical significance. Arch Neurol. Mar 2005;62(3):442-6. [Medline].
Phillips LH 2nd, Melnick PA. Diagnosis of myasthenia gravis in the 1990s. Semin Neurol. Mar 1990;10(1):62-9. [Medline].
Tóth L, Tóth A, Diószeghy P, Répássy G. Electronystagmographic analysis of optokinetic nystagmus for the evaluation of ocular symptoms in myasthenia gravis. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(6):629-32. [Medline].
Yang Q, Wei M, Sun F, Tian J, Chen X, Lu C. Open-loop and closed-loop optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) in myasthenia gravis and nonmyasthenic subjects. Exp Neurol. Nov 2000;166(1):166-72. [Medline].
Movaghar M, Slavin ML. Effect of local heat versus ice on blepharoptosis resulting from ocular myasthenia. Ophthalmology. Dec 2000;107(12):2209-14. [Medline].
Benatar M. A systematic review of diagnostic studies in myasthenia gravis. Neuromuscul Disord. Jul 2006;16(7):459-67. [Medline].
Saperstein DS, Barohn RJ. Management of myasthenia gravis. Semin Neurol. Mar 2004;24(1):41-8. [Medline].
Pascuzzi RM. Pearls and pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of neuromuscular junction disorders. Semin Neurol. Dec 2001;21(4):425-40. [Medline].
Richman DP, Agius MA. Treatment of autoimmune myasthenia gravis. Neurology. Dec 23 2003;61(12):1652-61. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Schneider-Gold C, Gajdos P, Toyka KV, Hohlfeld RR. Corticosteroids for myasthenia gravis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Apr 18 2005;CD002828. [Medline].
Drachman DB, Jones RJ, Brodsky RA. Treatment of refractory myasthenia: "rebooting" with high-dose cyclophosphamide. Ann Neurol. Jan 2003;53(1):29-34. [Medline].
Meriggioli MN, Ciafaloni E, Al-Hayk KA. Mycophenolate mofetil for myasthenia gravis: an analysis of efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Neurology. Nov 25 2003;61(10):1438-40. [Medline].
Lisak RP. Myasthenia Gravis. Curr Treat Options Neurol. Jul 1999;1(3):239-250. [Medline].
Gold R, Schneider-Gold C. Current and future standards in treatment of myasthenia gravis. Neurotherapeutics. Oct 2008;5(4):535-41. [Medline].
[Guideline] Benatar M, Kaminski HJ. Evidence report: the medical treatment of ocular myasthenia (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. Jun 12 2007;68(24):2144-9. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Hart IK, Sathasivam S, Sharshar T. Immunosuppressive agents for myasthenia gravis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Oct 17 2007;CD005224. [Medline].
Mandawat A, Kaminski HJ, Cutter G, Katirji B, Alshekhlee A. Comparative analysis of therapeutic options used for myasthenia gravis. Ann Neurol. Dec 2010;68(6):797-805. [Medline].
Dalakas MC. Intravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmune neuromuscular diseases. JAMA. May 19 2004;291(19):2367-75. [Medline].
Zinman L, Bril V. IVIG treatment for myasthenia gravis: effectiveness, limitations, and novel therapeutic strategies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1132:264-70. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Zinman L, Ng E, Bril V. IV immunoglobulin in patients with myasthenia gravis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. Mar 13 2007;68(11):837-41. [Medline].
Leite MI, Ströbel P, Jones M, Micklem K, Moritz R, Gold R, et al. Fewer thymic changes in MuSK antibody-positive than in MuSK antibody-negative MG. Ann Neurol. Mar 2005;57(3):444-8. [Medline].
Takanami I, Abiko T, Koizumi S. Therapeutic outcomes in thymectomied patients with myasthenia gravis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Dec 2009;15(6):373-7. [Medline].
Nieto IP, Robledo JP, Pajuelo MC, Montes JA, Giron JG, Alonso JG, et al. Prognostic factors for myasthenia gravis treated by thymectomy: review of 61 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. Jun 1999;67(6):1568-71. [Medline].
Goldstein SD, Yang SC. Assessment of robotic thymectomy using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. Apr 2010;89(4):1080-5; discussion 1085-6. [Medline].
| Osserman MG Class* | Mean Anti-AChR Titer (× 10–9 M) | Positive Results, % |
| R | 0.79 | 24 |
| I | 2.17 | 55 |
| IIA | 49.8 | 80 |
| IIB | 57.9 | 100 |
| III | 78.5 | 100 |
| IV | 205.3 | 89 |
| AChR = acetylcholine receptor; MG = myasthenia gravis. *Osserman classification: R = remission, I = ocular only, IIA = mild generalized, IIB = moderate generalized, III = acute severe, IV = chronic severe. | ||

