Pediatric Craniosynostosis Treatment & Management

  • Author: Raj D Sheth, MD; Chief Editor: Amy Kao, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jul 23, 2010
 

Medical Care

In the past 30 years, a better understanding of the pathophysiology and management of craniosynostosis has developed. Currently, surgery is usually cosmetic for infants with fusion of 1-2 sutures that result in a misshapen head. For infants with microcephaly (ie, secondary craniosynostosis), surgery usually is not required.

  • In patients with microcephaly, investigate the cause of microcephaly.
  • Measure head circumference longitudinally and monitor development. Ensure normal brain growth in patients with primary craniosynostosis.
  • Carefully monitor signs and symptoms of elevated intracranial pressure.
    • Examine the fundi and alert parents to report persistent vomiting or lethargy promptly.
    • Should elevated intracranial pressure be suspected, an emergent neurosurgical consult would be appropriate.
  • To preserve visual function in patients with elevated intracranial pressure, an emergent ophthalmological consult would be appropriate.
  • Address the cosmetic appearance of the skull abnormality.
Next

Surgical Care

Surgery is typically indicated for increased intracranial pressure or for cosmetic reasons.

Surgery is usually performed in the first year of life.

Sagittal synostosis before and after cranial vaultSagittal synostosis before and after cranial vault surgery and the associate improvement of scaphocephaly.
  • Do not operate in patients without raised intracranial pressure until considering the following:
    • If the shape of the head does not improve by age 2 months, then the abnormality is unlikely to resolve with age. Early referral is helpful if children can be considered for minimally invasive surgery. Infants have a large head relative to body size. Deformity appears more prominent in the young infant and may be less obvious with age.
    • Handle minor deformities conservatively. As the child grows and more hair appears, the visible abnormality may decrease.
  • Consideration for cosmetic surgery is dependent on the age of presentation and on which sutures have fused prematurely.
    • Aesthetic surgery is performed in infants aged 3-6 months in the author's practice, although a variety of approaches exist among different surgeons.{{ Ref8}
    • Surgery in younger infants may result in a relatively large loss of blood volume. Accordingly, minimally invasive surgical techniques should be considered.
    • Surgery in infants older than 8 months may be associated with a slowing of skull growth. Thus, the surgical defect may not be covered adequately by bone growth.
  • Infants with a defined syndrome causing craniosynostosis should be evaluated early for surgery.
    • Results are best when surgery is performed in infants younger than 6 months.
    • Patients with associated facial deformities may need a staged surgical approach (performed by a team of multidisciplinary specialists).
  • Positional molding
    • No surgery is indicated for posterior plagiocephaly secondary to positional molding.
    • The vast majority of infants improve with repositioning maneuvers and physical therapy for torticollis.
    • Some clinicians elect to use molding helmets for severe cases.
  • Cranial dysmorphology
    • Often patients present at a later age with nonspecific symptoms of increased intracranial pressure.[8]
    • Endoscopic correction of sagittal craniosynostosis is well established; however, metopic repair is less well defined.[9]
Previous
Next

Consultations

  • A pediatric neurologist should evaluate the cause of the craniosynostosis and differentiate secondary from primary craniosynostosis. The head circumference should be plotted carefully and monitored from birth onward.
  • A geneticist/dysmorphologist should evaluate for associated syndromes.
  • A plastic surgeon should evaluate the infant when synostosis is associated with facial deformities.
  • A neurosurgeon should evaluate a patient with primary craniosynostosis or elevated intracranial pressure.
  • An endocrinologist should evaluate the patient when appropriate.
Previous
Next

Activity

Following surgery, patients may require some restriction in activity under the direction of the treating neurosurgeon to avoid head injury.

Previous
Proceed to Follow-up
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Raj D Sheth, MD  Professor, Mayo College of Medicine; Chief, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Nemours Children's Clinic

Raj D Sheth, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Epilepsy Society, American Neurological Association, and Child Neurology Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Bermans J Iskandar, MD  Director, Associate Professor, Departments of Neurological Surgery, Pediatrics, Children's Hospital, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics

Bermans J Iskandar, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ian M Heger, MD  Assistant Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville; Assistant Director of Clinical Services, Pediatric Neurosurgery Center, Wolfson Children's Hospital

Ian M Heger, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Epilepsy Society, American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons, Children's Oncology Group, and Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Saswata Roy, MD  Pediatric Otolaryngologist, Director, Facial Anomalies and Cranial Base Program, Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Nemours Children's Clinic

Saswata Roy, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

James J Riviello Jr, MD  George Peterkin Endowed Chair in Pediatrics, Professor of Pediatrics, Section of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Professor of Neurology, Peter Kellaway Section of Neurophysiology, Baylor College of Medicine; Chief of Neurophysiology, Director of the Epilepsy and Neurophysiology Program, Texas Children's Hospital

James J Riviello Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Kenneth J Mack, MD, PhD  Senior Associate Consultant, Department of Child and Adolescent Neurology, Mayo Clinic

Kenneth J Mack, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, Child Neurology Society, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Neuroscience

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Selim R Benbadis, MD  Professor, Director of Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of South Florida School of Medicine, Tampa General Hospital

Selim R Benbadis, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Sleep Medicine, American Clinical Neurophysiology Society, American Epilepsy Society, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: UCB Pharma Honoraria Speaking, consulting; Lundbeck Honoraria Speaking, consulting; Cyberonics Honoraria Speaking, consulting; Glaxo Smith Kline Honoraria Speaking, consulting; Pfizer Honoraria Speaking, consulting; Sleepmed/DigiTrace Honoraria Speaking, consulting

Chief Editor

Amy Kao, MD  Attending Neurologist, Children's National Medical Center, Washington DC

Amy Kao, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Epilepsy Society, and Child Neurology Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Jabs EW. Toward understanding the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis through clinical and molecular correlates. Clin Genet. Feb 1998;53(2):79-86. [Medline].

  2. Higginbottom MC, Jones KL, James HE. Intrauterine constraint and craniosynostosis. Neurosurgery. Jan 1980;6(1):39-44. [Medline].

  3. Sheth RD, Schaefer GB, Keller GM, et al. Size of the corpus callosum in cerebral palsy. J Neuroimaging. Jul 1996;6(3):180-3. [Medline].

  4. Schaefer GB, Sheth RD, Bodensteiner JB. Cerebral dysgenesis. An overview. Neurol Clin. Nov 1994;12(4):773-88. [Medline].

  5. Losee JE, Corde Mason A. Deformational plagiocephaly: diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 2005;32(1):53-64. [Medline].

  6. Robin NH. Molecular genetic advances in understanding craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1999;103(3):1060-70. [Medline].

  7. Liu B, Yu HM, Hsu W. Craniosynostosis caused by Axin2 deficiency is mediated through distinct functions of beta-catenin in proliferation and differentiation. Dev Biol. Jan 1 2007;301(1):298-308. [Medline].

  8. Scott JR, Isom CN, Gruss JS, Salemy S, Ellenbogen RG, Avellino A. Symptom outcomes following cranial vault expansion for craniosynostosis in children older than 2 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2009;123(1):289-97; discussion 298-9. [Medline].

  9. Keshavarzi S, Hayden MG, Ben-Haim S, Meltzer HS, Cohen SR, Levy ML. Variations of endoscopic and open repair of metopic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. Sep 2009;20(5):1439-44. [Medline].

  10. Anderson PJ, Netherway DJ, Abbott A, David DJ. Intracranial Volume Measurement of Metopic Craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 11 2004;15(6):1014-1016. [Medline].

  11. Cunningham ML, Heike CL. Evaluation of the infant with an abnormal skull shape. Curr Opin Pediatr. Dec 2007;19(6):645-51. [Medline].

  12. Dundulis JA, Becker DB, Govier DP, et al. Coronal ring involvement in patients treated for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2004;114(7):1695-703. [Medline].

  13. Elmslie FV, Reardon W. Craniofacial developmental abnormalities. Curr Opin Neurol. Apr 1998;11(2):103-8. [Medline].

  14. Fernbach SK. Craniosynostosis 1998: concepts and controversies. Pediatr Radiol. Sep 1998;28(9):722-8. [Medline].

  15. Keshavarzi S, Hayden MG, Ben-Haim S, Meltzer HS, Cohen SR, Levy ML. Variations of endoscopic and open repair of metopic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. Sep 2009;20(5):1439-44. [Medline].

  16. Liptak GS, Serletti JM. Pediatric approach to craniosynostosis. Pediatr Rev. Oct 1998;19(10):352; quiz 359. [Medline].

  17. Miraoui H, Ringe J, Haupl T, Marie PJ. Increased EFG- and PDGF{alpha}-receptor signaling by mutant FGF-receptor 2 contributes to osteoblast dysfunction in Apert craniosynostosis. Hum Mol Genet. Feb 13 2010;[Medline].

  18. Sheth RD, Mullett MD, Bodensteiner JB, Hobbs GR. Longitudinal head growth in developmentally normal preterm infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Dec 1995;149(12):1358-61. [Medline].

  19. Stelnicki E, Heger I, Brooks CJ, Ghersi MM, Stubbs CB, Bahuleyan B. Endoscopic release of unicoronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. Jan 2009;20(1):93-7. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Diagram of a neonate's skull demonstrating the location of the sutures.
Frontal view showing a fused and ridged metopic suture on 3-dimensional CT.
CT image demonstrating features of secondary craniosynostosis with cerebral atrophy. Cerebral atrophy is not present in primary craniosynostosis.
Positional molding. Note the anterior displacement of the right occiput and of the right frontal region on the same side, which differentiate positional molding from posterior plagiocephaly craniosynostosis.
Posterior view of 3-dimensional cranial CT demonstrating early fusion of the lambdoid suture.
Isolated fusion of the metopic suture. Note that the remaining sutures are open.
Trigonocephaly. Note the triangular shape of the head.
Infant with primary craniosynostosis. The specific deformity of the skull is Kleeblattschadel or cloverleaf skull.
Skull deformities associated with single suture synostosis.
Positional plagiocephaly. Note anterior position of the ear on the side with occipital flattening.
Sagittal synostosis and the associated scaphocephaly seen on skull radiograph and 3-dimensional craniofacial CT scan.
Sagittal synostosis before and after cranial vault surgery and the associate improvement of scaphocephaly.
Unilateral coronal deformity with retrusion of the orbit and harlequin eye deformity. Note the ipsilateral deviation of the nasal radix and the contralateral deviation of the nasal tip.
Fusion of coronal sutures bilaterally. Note the increase transverse dimension and retrusion of the orbital rim.
Intraoperative view of bilateral coronal synostosis. Note the decreased anterior-posterior dimension, increased transverse width and retruded orbital rim.
Pre- and postoperative photos of metopic synostosis. Note the prominent forehead keel corrected after surgical repair.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.