eMedicine Specialties > Neurology > Pediatric Neurology

Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy

Author: Naganand Sripathi, MD, Director, Neuromuscular Clinic, Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 3, 2010

Introduction

Background

Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is one of the most common types of muscular dystrophy. It has distinct regional involvement and progression. FSHD is an autosomal dominant disorder in as many as 90% of affected patients. Landouzy and Dejerine first described FSHD in 1884. Tyler and Stephens described an extensive family from Utah in which 6 generations were affected. Walton and Nattrass established FSHD as a distinct muscular dystrophy with specific diagnostic criteria.

Pathophysiology

It is an autosomal dominant disease in 70-90% of patients and is sporadic in the rest. One of the FSHD genes has been localized to chromosome band 4q35, but the gene or genes that are affected in FSHD are still unknown. Patients with FSHD have a shorter Eco RI digestion fragment detected by the chromosome-4qter DNA marker p13E-11. About 2% of FSHD patients are not linked to the locus at 4q35.

The probe p13E-11 identifies 2 polymorphic loci at 4q35 and 10q26. The Eco R1 fragment of 4q is composed of repetitive DNA sequences that are 3.3-kilobase (kb) Kpn I tandem repeats identified as D4Z4. In control subjects, the D4Z4 repeat consists of 11-100 KpnI units, each 3.3 kb, whereas in FSHD this is shortened; the shortened Eco RI fragment in FSHD is 1-10 units. Diagnostic difficulties arise as these fragments also may come from chromosome 10, as already described. 4-Type units are resistant to Bln I and 10-type units are resistant to Xap I. The combined use of EcoRI, BlnI, and XapI in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis–based DNA separation techniques allows detection of 4q fragments.

  • FSHD is caused by a deletion of D4Z4 macrosatellite repeats in the subtelomeric region of the 4qA161 haplotype of chromosome 4.
  • Those without FSHD have approximately 11-100 D4Z4 units, whereas patients with FSHD have 1-10 D4Z4 units.
  • At least 1 copy of D4Z4 is required to develop FSHD.
  • Mosaic males are mostly affected, where as mosaic females with an equal complement of affected cells are more often asymptomatic carriers.
  • A bi-allelic variation of chromosome 4qter is known, designated as 4qA and 4qB. FSHD alleles are exclusively of the 4qter type (4qA161).
  • Although the genetic lesion is well described in FSHD, the causal gene and the protein products are not known.
  • The most extensively studies candidate genes for FSHD on 4q35 are ANT1, PDLIM3, FRG1, TUBB4q, FRG2, and DUX4.

Disease mechanisms

The actual genetic defect in FSHD is unknown. Possible disease mechanisms include the following:

  • Position variegation effect on a proximal candidate gene or genes
  • Direct and indirect evidence points to epigenetic modifications in the DNA. A local deficit of a repressor complex due to the contraction of D4Z4 may cause inappropriate expression of genes. This may account for upregulation of FRG2, FRG1, and ANT1 in FSHD muscle.
  • The most common modification of mammalian DNA is cytosine methylation that is necessary for many regulatory processes. D4Z4 was found to be hypomethylated in FSHD.
  • Myoblasts from patients with FSHD also demonstrate increased susceptibility to oxidative stress.
  • Misexpression of FRG1 (FSHD region gene 1) may lead to the development of FSHD. Knockdown of FRG1 in Xenopus led to the decreased angiogenesis and reduced expression of DAB2 (angiogenic regulator). Of patients with FSHD, 50-75% exhibit retinal vasculopathy and increased expression of vascular or endothelial-related FRG1 transcripts in the muscle. Thus FRG1 may be at least crucial for angiogenesis.
  • Deletion of D4Z4 macrosatellites results in aberrant gene expression. DUX4 transcript from the last D4Z4 (most telomeric) unit generates small si/miRNA-sized fragments; uncapped, polyadenylated 3-prime fragments encoding C-terminal portion of DUX4; capped and polyadenylated mRNAs containing the double-homeobox domain of DUX4, but splice-out the C-terminal polypeptide. C-terminal polypeptide produced by transfection studies inhibits myogenesis.1

Frequency

United States

FSHD is the third most common muscular dystrophy. Estimated prevalence of FSHD is 1 case in 20,000 persons.

Mortality/Morbidity

Most of the patients have normal life expectancy.

Sex

Frequency is higher in males; however, asymptomatic cases are more common in females.

Age

  • The usual presentation is between the first and third decades. Ninety-five percent of patients show clinical features before age 20 years. As many as one third of patients are asymptomatic.
  • Infantile onset has been described, but is rare.

Clinical

Physical

  • Initial weakness is seen in facial muscles, starting in the orbicularis oculi, orbicularis oris, and zygomaticus.
    • Patients may have difficulty with labial sounds, whistling, or drinking through a straw.
    • Weakness may be asymmetric.
    • Extraocular and pharyngeal muscles are spared.
  • Shoulder weakness is the presenting symptom in more than 82% of patients with symptoms.
    • Scapular fixation is weak from the onset. Winging of the scapula is the most characteristic sign. The scapula is placed more laterally than normal. It moves upwards in shoulder abduction.
    • The deltoid muscle usually is spared, and shoulder abduction weakness is predominantly due to weak scapula fixation.
    • If the scapula is stabilized manually against the chest wall, the patient may experience improved movement. Upward slope of the anterior axillary fold results from weakness of the pectoralis major.
  • Truncal weakness is early. Lower abdominal muscles are weaker than upper abdominal muscles, resulting in the Beevor sign, a physical finding very specific for FSHD. The Beevor sign is the upward movement of the umbilicus toward the head when flexing the neck.
  • Weakness of foot dorsiflexion follows shoulder weakness.
    • Tibialis anterior muscle weakness is highly characteristic, whereas posterior muscles of the leg are spared.
    • In a few patients, a foot-drop gait is the presenting complaint. In more than 50% of patients, the pelvic girdle muscles are never involved.
  • Atypical phenotypes in patients with FSHD
    • Scapulohumeral dystrophy (SHD) or facial-sparing SHD with or without myalgia
    • FSHD with chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO)
    • Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy syndrome
    • Distal myopathy
    • Asymmetric brachial weakness
  • Extramuscular manifestations are as follows:
    • High-frequency hearing loss in almost 75%
    • Retinal telangiectasias in about 60%
    • Atrial arrhythmias in 5%
    • Restrictive respiratory disease in 1%
    • Mental retardation
    • Seizures
    • Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is very common in FSHD. Obstructive sleep apnea, REM-related oxygen desaturation, or mixed pattern were observed in 39% of FSHD patients. SDB is not related to severity of the disease.2

More on Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy

Overview: Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy
Treatment & Medication: Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy
Follow-up: Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy
References

References

  1. Snider L, Asawachaicharn A, Tyler AE, et al. RNA transcripts, miRNA-sized fragments and proteins produced from D4Z4 units: new candidates for pathophysiology of facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:2414-2430.

  2. Della Marca G, Frusciante R, Dittoni S, Vollono C, Buccarella C, Iannaccone E, et al. Sleep disordered breathing in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. J Neurol Sci. Oct 15 2009;285(1-2):54-8. [Medline].

  3. Payan CA, Hogrel JY, Hammouda EH, Lacomblez L, Ollivier G, Doppler V, et al. Periodic salbutamol in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Jul 2009;90(7):1094-101. [Medline].

  4. Olsen DB, Orngreen MC, Vissing J. Aerobic training improves exercise performance in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neurology. Mar 22 2005;64(6):1064-6. [Medline].

  5. Bunch WH, Siegel IM. Scapulothoracic arthrodesis in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Review of seventeen procedures with three to twenty-one-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1993;75(3):372-6. [Medline].

  6. Demirhan M, Uysal O, Atalar AC, et al. Scapulothoracic arthrodesis in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy with multifilament cable. Clin Orthop Relat Res. in press;2009.

  7. Ricci E, Galluzzi G, Deidda G, et al. Progress in the molecular diagnosis of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and correlation between the number of KpnI repeats at the 4q35 locus and clinical phenotype. Ann Neurol. Jun 1999;45(6):751-7. [Medline].

  8. Faustmann PM, Farahati J, Rupilius B, et al. Cardiac involvement in facio-scapulo-humeral muscular dystrophy: a family study using Thallium-201 single-photon-emission-computed tomography. J Neurol Sci. Dec 1996;144(1-2):59-63. [Medline].

  9. Funakoshi M, Goto K, Arahata K. Epilepsy and mental retardation in a subset of early onset 4q35-facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neurology. Jun 1998;50(6):1791-4. [Medline].

  10. Gilchrist JM. Other muscular dystrophies. In: Gilchrist JM, ed. Prognosis in Neurology. Butterworth-Heinemann;1998:347-9.

  11. Griggs RC, Mendell JR, Miller RG. The muscular dystrophies. In: Evaluation and Treatment of Myopathies. Philadelphia: FA Davis Co;1995:122-8.

  12. Kissel JT, McDermott MP, Mendell JR, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of albuterol in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Neurology. Oct 23 2001;57(8):1434-40. [Medline].

  13. Kissel JT, McDermott MP, Natarajan R, et al. Pilot trial of albuterol in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. FSH-DY Group. Neurology. May 1998;50(5):1402-6. [Medline].

  14. Krasnianski M, Eger K, Neudecker S, et al. Atypical phenotypes in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4q35 deletion. Arch Neurol. Oct 2003;60(10):1421-5. [Medline].

  15. Laoudj-Chenivesse D, Carnac G, Bisbal C, et al. Increased levels of adenine nucleotide translocator 1 protein and response to oxidative stress are early events in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy muscle. J Mol Med. Mar 2005;83(3):216-24. [Medline].

  16. Neudecker S, Krasnianski M, Bahn E, Zierz S. Rimmed vacuoles in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: a unique ultrastructural feature. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). Sep 2004;108(3):257-9. [Medline].

  17. Snider L, Asawachaicharn A, Tyler AE, Geng LN, Petek LM, Maves L. RNA transcripts, miRNA-sized fragments and proteins produced from D4Z4 units: new candidates for the pathophysiology of facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. Jul 1 2009;18(13):2414-30. [Medline].

  18. Tawil R, Figlewicz DA, Griggs RC, Weiffenbach B. Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy: a distinct regional myopathy with a novel molecular pathogenesis. FSH Consortium. Ann Neurol. Mar 1998;43(3):279-82. [Medline].

  19. Tawil R, Forrester J, Griggs RC, et al. Evidence for anticipation and association of deletion size with severity in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. The FSH-DY Group. Ann Neurol. Jun 1996;39(6):744-8. [Medline].

  20. Tawil R, Van Der Maarel SM. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. Jul 2006;34(1):1-15. [Medline].

  21. Walter MC, Lochmuller H, Reilich P, et al. Creatine monohydrate in muscular dystrophies: A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Neurology. May 9 2000;54(9):1848-50. [Medline].

  22. Winokur ST, Barrett K, Martin JH, et al. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) myoblasts demonstrate increased susceptibility to oxidative stress. Neuromuscul Disord. May 2003;13(4):322-33. [Medline].

  23. Wuebbles RD, Hanel ML, Jones PL. FSHD region gene 1 (FRG1) is crucuial for angiogenesis linkinh FRG! to facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy-associated vasculopathy. Dis Model Mech. May-Jun 2009;2(5-6):267-274.

Further Reading

Keywords

FSHD, muscular dystrophy, Eco RI digestion fragment, Eco RI restriction enzyme, DUX1 protein, adenine nucleotide translocator 1 protein, scapulohumeral dystrophy, SHD, facial-sparing SHD with or without myalgia, chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia, CPEO, limb-girdle muscular dystrophy syndrome, distal myopathy, asymmetric brachial weakness

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Naganand Sripathi, MD, Director, Neuromuscular Clinic, Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital
Naganand Sripathi, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Medical Association, Michigan State Medical Society, and New York Academy of Sciences
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

James J Riviello Jr, MD, George Peterkin Endowed Chair in Pediatrics, Professor of Pediatrics, Section of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Professor of Neurology, Peter Kellaway Section of Neurophysiology, Baylor College of Medicine; Chief of Neurophysiology, Director of the Epilepsy and Neurophysiology Program, Texas Children's Hospital
James J Riviello Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Kenneth J Mack, MD, PhD, Senior Associate Consultant, Department of Child and Adolescent Neurology, Mayo Clinic
Kenneth J Mack, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, Child Neurology Society, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Neuroscience
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Amy Kao, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University; Consulting Staff, Shriners Hospital for Children
Amy Kao, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Epilepsy Society, and Child Neurology Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

RELATED MEDSCAPE ARTICLES
Articles
 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.