Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Treatment & Management
- Author: David T Hsieh, MD, FAAP; Chief Editor: Amy Kao, MD more...
For individuals diagnosed with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), routine examinations should focus on the potential complications.
Annual examinations permit early detection of problems, decreasing morbidity and improving quality of life.
Annual eye examinations are important in early detection of optic nerve lesions.
Cutaneous examination performed at each visit should look for new neurofibromas or progression of preexisting lesions. Plexiform neurofibromas may be locally invasive, therefore clinical evaluation should be directed at determining the extent of involvement and detecting evidence of bony erosion or nerve entrapment.
Skeletal involvement, including scoliosis, hemihypertrophy, or long-bone modeling defects, should be documented.
Blood pressure should be checked at each visit and hypertension treated promptly if detected. Hypertension workup should include evaluation for pheochromocytoma (ie, measurement of urinary catecholamines and metanephrines) and testing for renal artery stenosis. Percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty may, in some cases, effectively treat renal artery stenosis secondary to fibromuscular dysplasia.
Interval history should focus on subtle sensory or motor symptoms such as paresthesia, radiculopathy, weakness, or muscle atrophy.
Patients should be asked about incontinence. At each visit, minor changes in the sensory or motor examination should be documented carefully.
Symptoms of spinal cord neurofibromas may be subtle and slowly progressive; prompt identification and early surgical intervention allow for optimal outcome.
Removal of neurofibromas for medical or cosmetic indications is one of the most common procedures on individuals with NF1.
Recent advances in laser technology have permitted nonsurgical removal of small, cutaneous neurofibromas.
However, careful surgical resection of small or large neurofibromas may leave an even smaller, less prominent scar.
Although laser treatment has been used for various cutaneous, hyperpigmented lesions (eg, port-wine stains, tattoos), it has not yet proven successful in permanent removal of café-au-lait spots.
Use of chemotherapy to treat malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) that are unresectable or metastatic has been debated for a number of years, with less than optimal outcomes using a variety of combinations of agents. More recently, in vitro studies looking at a broader range of agents targeting the Ras and/or other relevant pathways have shown some promising results.
Farnesyl transferases used in combination with lovastatin have shown synergistic effects in growth inhibition of MPNST cell lines in vitro. 
Sorafenib also appears to inhibit MPNST cell growth in vitro. 
A rapamycin complex 1 inhibitor (RAD001) demonstrated decreased tumor cell growth when used alone, and, when used in combination with erlotinib (an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor), showed even further growth inhibition and tumor cell apoptosis. 
Hyaluronan oligomers, another promising agent, has shown efficacy in slowing growth of MPNSTs in animal models. These small molecules, when used in combination with a traditional chemotherapy agent (doxorubicin), substantially inhibit tumor growth. 
In the near future, studies such as these will likely lead to preclinical and then clinical trials for patients with unresectable MPNSTs.
The use of chemotherapy, especially with carboplatin and vincristine have been shown to be effective in controlling the progression of optic nerve gliomas.
Surgical resection of neurofibromas can be accomplished, but plastic surgery consultation is advisable for areas of great cosmetic concern such as the face. Resection is the treatment of choice for pheochromocytomas.
Neurofibromas that press on vital structures, obstruct vision, or grow rapidly deserve immediate attention.
Plexiform neurofibromas may be difficult to approach surgically, often recurring after resection because of residual tumor cell collections deep in soft tissues. Surgeons must realize that removing some of these lesions can result in substantial blood loss and must plan accordingly.
Symptomatic peripheral nerve sheath tumors located along the nerves of the brachial or pelvic plexus sometimes require surgical intervention with the very real potential for postoperative nerve dysfunction. Added to this is the risk for malignant transformation that carries with it a very poor prognosis; the decision to operate requires much thought and careful consideration. One should always weigh the potential diagnostic benefits taking into account one's index of suspicion for malignancy, against the potential risks for long-term neurologic sequelae.
For many patients, neurofibromas on the scalp, along the hairline, or around the waist where clothes rub can cause great irritation and discomfort. Therefore, removing these should not be considered cosmetic but a necessary medical procedure.
Resection of spinal cord tumors is difficult but often necessary to prevent progressive paraplegia or quadriplegia.
Acting promptly when neurological symptoms appear is important to maximize operative success.
Surgical intervention may not guarantee a complete resection of the tumor, but it may serve a palliative function in some cases.
Single fraction radiosurgery has been used in some centers to treat benign intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors. This technique may be used as a primary therapeutic approach or in cases of postsurgical progression or when residual tumor is a concern after a subtotal surgical resection. 
Orthopedic intervention is indicated for rapidly progressive scoliosis and for some severe bony defects.
Following patients with NF1 when scoliosis is first detected is advisable, so that nonsurgical approaches may be used in an attempt to obviate the need for a future spinal fusion procedure.
Patients with long-bone defects are best served by ongoing orthopedic care.
Some hypertensive patients with renal artery stenosis require surgical resection and repair instead of or following angioplasty.
Resection of a pheochromocytoma requires preoperative treatment with an alpha-blocker (preferably a selective postsynaptic alpha1-receptor antagonist) to offset the effects of catecholamine release during surgical manipulation of the tumor.
The neurologist serves as a key consultant and provides valuable information concerning changes in neurological status by performing a complete, focused examination.
The neurosurgeon serves as an expert consultant when a spinal cord or brain tumor is identified and works closely with the neurologist to determine the optimal timing and best surgical approach on an individual basis.
The ophthalmologist serves as a valuable member of the NF1 consultation team, evaluating patients on an annual basis for changes in visual acuity, field defects, or appearance of Lisch nodules.
The geneticist provides information concerning diagnosis, diagnostic testing, inheritance, and risks for recurrence in future children. Family planning options and prenatal diagnosis may be addressed in this clinical setting.
The orthopedist is a key consultant for the many NF1-related bone abnormalities (eg, scoliosis, pseudarthrosis, hemihypertrophy, bony erosion by plexiform neurofibromas).
The developmental pediatrician may be an invaluable resource in evaluating a child with NF1 and learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or autism spectrum disorder.
In addition to these most frequently used consultants, patients may need to see others for specific NF1 concerns. Examples include the following:
A nephrologist to help rule out renal vascular lesions
A general or plastic surgeon to consider removal of neurofibromas
An oncologist to manage and treat symptomatic optic nerve gliomas, brain tumors, neurosarcomas and MPNSTs
An otolaryngologist for suspected hearing loss or an acoustic nerve lesion
A dermatologist to assess cutaneous lesions
An oculoplastic surgeon for an orbital plexiform neurofibroma
No activity restrictions are necessary, except for an individual with specific orthopedic concerns (as recommended by the consulting surgeon).
Patients with spinal fusion procedures as well as individuals with significant long-bone weakness or pseudarthrosis may need to limit certain athletic activities.
Patients with neurological sequelae from spinal cord lesions may be restricted in their activities secondary to physical disabilities.
Wilding A, Ingham SL, Lalloo F, et al. Life expectancy in hereditary cancer predisposing diseases: an observational study. J Med Genet. 2012. 49:264–9. [Medline].
Dugoff L, Sujansky E. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and pregnancy. Am J Med Genet. 1996 Dec 2. 66(1):7-10. [Medline].
Darrigo LG Jr, Geller M, Bonalumi Filho A, et al. Prevalence of plexiform neurofibroma in children and adolescents with type I neurofibromatosis. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2007 Nov-Dec. 83(6):571-3. [Medline].
Rodriguez FJ, Perry A, Gutmann DH, et al. Gliomas in neurofibromatosis type 1: a clinicopathologic study of 100 patients. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2008 Mar. 67(3):240-9. [Medline].
Porter DE, Prasad V, Foster L, Dall GF, Birch R, Grimer RJ. Survival in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumours: A Comparison between Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Associated Tumours. Sarcoma. 2009. 2009:756395. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Basile U, Cavallaro G, Polistena A, Giustini S, Orlando G, Cotesta D. Gastrointestinal and Retroperitoneal Manifestations of Type 1 Neurofibromatosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jun 3. [Medline].
Hegyi L, Thway K, Newton R, Osin P, Nerurkar A, Hayes AJ. Malignant myoepithelioma arising in adenomyoepithelioma of the breast and coincident multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumours in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Clin Pathol. 2009 Jul. 62(7):653-5. [Medline].
Yamamoto H, Tobo T, Nakamori M, Imamura M, Kojima A, Oda Y. Neurofibromatosis type 1-related gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a special reference to loss of heterozygosity at 14q and 22q. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun. 135(6):791-8. [Medline].
Garg S, Green J, Leadbitter K, Emsley R, Lehtonen A, Evans DG, et al. Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Pediatrics. 2013 Nov 4. [Medline].
Brunetti-Pierri N, Doty SB, Hicks J, et al. Generalized metabolic bone disease in Neurofibromatosis type I. Mol Genet Metab. 2008 May. 94(1):105-11. [Medline].
Stevenson DA, Schwarz EL, Viskochil DH, et al. Evidence of increased bone resorption in neurofibromatosis type 1 using urinary pyridinium crosslink analysis. Pediatr Res. 2008 Jun. 63(6):697-701. [Medline].
Seitz S, Schnabel C, Busse B, Schmidt HU, Beil FT, Friedrich RE, et al. High bone turnover and accumulation of osteoid in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jan. 21(1):119-27. [Medline].
Tucker T, Schnabel C, Hartmann M, Friedrich RE, Frieling I, Kruse HP. Bone health and fracture rate in individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). J Med Genet. 2009 Apr. 46(4):259-65. [Medline].
Smith A, Araoz PA, Kirsch J. Coronary arterial aneurysms in neurofibromatosis 1: case report and review of the literature. J Thorac Imaging. 2009 May. 24(2):129-31. [Medline].
Diggs-Andrews KA, Brown JA, Gianino SM, et al. Sex is a major determinant of neuronal dysfunction in neurofibromatosis type 1. Ann Neurol. 2014. 75:309-16. [Medline].
Gutmann DH, Aylsworth A, Carey JC, et al. The diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management of neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2. JAMA. 1997. 278:51-7. [Medline].
Listernick R, Ferner RE, Liu, GT, Gutmann DH. Optic pathway gliomas in neurofibromatosis-1: Controversies and recommendations. Ann Neurol. 2007. 61:189-98. [Medline].
Spurlock G, Bennett E, Chuzhanova N, Thomas N, Jim HP, Side L. SPRED1 mutations (Legius syndrome): another clinically useful genotype for dissecting the neurofibromatosis type 1 phenotype. J Med Genet. 2009 Jul. 46(7):431-7. [Medline].
Shah KN. The diagnostic and clinical significance of café-au-lait macules. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010. 57:1131-53. [Medline].
Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP, Athyros VG, et al. Pheochromocytoma: an update on genetics and management. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007 Dec. 14(4):935-56. [Medline].
Lenders JW, Pacak K, Walther MM, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best?. JAMA. 2002 Mar 20. 287(11):1427-34. [Medline].
Prada CE, Hufnagel RB, Hummel TR, et al. The use of magnetic resonance imaging screening for optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr. 2015. 167:851-6. [Medline].
Tucker T, Friedman JM, Friedrich RE, Wenzel R, Fünsterer C, Mautner VF. Longitudinal study of neurofibromatosis 1 associated plexiform neurofibromas. J Med Genet. 2009 Feb. 46(2):81-5. [Medline].
Iannicelli E, Rossi G, Almberger M, et al. Integrated imaging in peripheral nerve lesions in type 1 neurofibromatosis. Radiol Med (Torino). 2002 Apr. 103(4):332-43. [Medline].
Matsumine A, Kusuzaki K, Nakamura T, Nakazora S, Niimi R, Matsubara T, et al. Differentiation between neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis 1 evaluated by MRI. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul. 135(7):891-900. [Medline].
Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Ahlman H, et al. Pheochromocytoma: recommendations for clinical practice from the First International Symposium. October 2005. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Feb. 3(2):92-102. [Medline].
Benz MR, Tchekmedyian N, Eilber FC, Federman N, Czernin J, Tap WD. Utilization of positron emission tomography in the management of patients with sarcoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2009 Jul. 21(4):345-51. [Medline].
Levine E, Huntrakoon M, Wetzel LH. Malignant nerve-sheath neoplasms in neurofibromatosis: distinction from benign tumors by using imaging techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Nov. 149(5):1059-64. [Medline].
Wojtkowiak JW, Fouad F, LaLonde DT, et al. Induction of apoptosis in neurofibromatosis type 1 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cell lines by a combination of novel farnesyl transferase inhibitors and lovastatin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008 Jul. 326(1):1-11. [Medline].
Ambrosini G, Cheema HS, Seelman S, et al. Sorafenib inhibits growth and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in malignant peripheral nerve sheath cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Apr. 7(4):890-6. [Medline].
Johansson G, Mahller YY, Collins MH, et al. Effective in vivo targeting of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 May. 7(5):1237-45. [Medline].
Slomiany MG, Dai L, Bomar PA, Knackstedt TJ, Kranc DA, Tolliver L, et al. Abrogating drug resistance in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors by disrupting hyaluronan-CD44 interactions with small hyaluronan oligosaccharides. Cancer Res. 2009 Jun 15. 69(12):4992-8. [Medline].
Hari Kumar KV, Shaikh A, Sandhu AS, Prusty P. Neurofibromatosis 1 with pheochromocytoma. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Oct. 15 Suppl 4:S406-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Gerszten PC, Burton SA, Ozhasoglu C, et al. Radiosurgery for benign intradural spinal tumors. Neurosurgery. 2008 Apr. 62(4):887-95; discussion 895-6. [Medline].
Bravo EL, Tagle R. Pheochromocytoma: state-of-the-art and future prospects. Endocr Rev. 2003 Aug. 24(4):539-53. [Medline].
AAP Committee on Genetics. Health supervision for children with neurofibromatosis. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Genetics. Pediatrics. 1995 Aug. 96(2 Pt 1):368-72. [Medline].
Chander S, Westphal SM, Zak IT, et al. Retroperitoneal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: evaluation with serial FDG-PET. Clin Nucl Med. 2004 Jul. 29(7):415-8. [Medline].
DeClue JE, Cohen BD, Lowy DR. Identification and characterization of the neurofibromatosis type 1 protein product. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 15. 88(22):9914-8. [Medline].
Deliganis AV, Geyer JR, Berger MS. Prognostic significance of type 1 neurofibromatosis (von Recklinghausen Disease) in childhood optic glioma. Neurosurgery. 1996 Jun. 38(6):1114-8; discussion 1118-9. [Medline].
Denckla MB, Hofman K, Mazzocco MM, et al. Relationship between T2-weighted hyperintensities (unidentified bright objects) and lower IQs in children with neurofibromatosis-1. Am J Med Genet. 1996 Feb 16. 67(1):98-102. [Medline].
Drouet A, Wolkenstein P, Lefaucheur JP, et al. Neurofibromatosis 1-associated neuropathies: a reappraisal. Brain. 2004 Sep. 127:1993-2009. [Medline].
Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2002 May. 39(5):311-4. [Medline].
Ferner RE, Hughes RA, Hall SM, et al. Neurofibromatous neuropathy in neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). J Med Genet. 2004 Nov. 41(11):837-41. [Medline].
Gutmann DH, Collins FS. The neurofibromatosis type 1 gene and its protein product, neurofibromin. Neuron. 1993 Mar. 10(3):335-43. [Medline].
Habiby R, Silverman B, Listernick R, et al. Precocious puberty in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr. 1995 Mar. 126(3):364-7. [Medline].
Hughes RJ, Scoble JE, Reidy JF. Renal angioplasty in non-atheromatous renal artery stenosis: technical results and clinical outcome in 43 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004 Sep-Oct. 27(5):435-40. [Medline].
Karadimas P, Hatzispasou E, Bouzas EA. Retinal vascular abnormalities in neurofibromatosis type 1. J Neuroophthalmol. 2003 Dec. 23(4):274-5. [Medline].
Korf BR. Malignancy in neurofibromatosis type 1. Oncologist. 2000. 5(6):477-85. [Medline].
Levy AD, Patel N, Abbott RM, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis: imaging features with clinicopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec. 183(6):1629-36. [Medline].
Listernick R, Ferner RE, Piersall L, et al. Late-onset optic pathway tumors in children with neurofibromatosis 1. Neurology. 2004 Nov 23. 63(10):1944-6. [Medline].
Nakakura S, Shiraki K, Yasunari T, et al. Quantification and anatomic distribution of choroidal abnormalities in patients with type I neurofibromatosis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct. 243(10):980-4. [Medline].
Neurofibromatosis. Conference statement. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Arch Neurol. 1988 May. 45(5):575-8. [Medline].
North KN, Riccardi V, Samango-Sprouse C, et al. Cognitive function and academic performance in neurofibromatosis. 1: consensus statement from the NF1 Cognitive Disorders Task Force. Neurology. 1997 Apr. 48(4):1121-7. [Medline].
Riccardi VM. Neurofibromatosis. Phenotype, Natural History and Pathogenesis. 2nd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press; 1992.
Scott RM, Smith JL, Robertson RL, Madsen JR, Soriano SG, Rockoff MA. Long-term outcome in children with moyamoya syndrome after cranial revascularization by pial synangiosis. J Neurosurg. 2004 Feb. 100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):142-9. [Medline].
Solomon J, Warren K, Dombi E, et al. Automated detection and volume measurement of plexiform neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1 using magnetic resonance imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2004 Jul. 28(5):257-65. [Medline].
Zacharia TT, Jaramillo D, Poussaint TY, et al. MR imaging of abdominopelvic involvement in neurofibromatosis type 1: a review of 43 patients. Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Mar. 35(3):317-22. [Medline].
Zöller M, Rembeck B, Akesson HO, et al. Life expectancy, mortality and prognostic factors in neurofibromatosis type 1. A twelve-year follow-up of an epidemiological study in Göteborg, Sweden. Acta Derm Venereol. 1995 Mar. 75(2):136-40. [Medline].