Background
Rosacea is a dermatologic condition associated with a chronic inflammatory process that affects the midfacial region.[1, 2, 3, 4] The nose, cheeks, forehead, chin, and glabella are the most commonly affected areas. Clinical features include flushing, telangiectasias, erythema, papules and pustules, and rhinophyma. More than 50% of patients with rosacea have ocular manifestations.
See the image below.
Typical dermatologic findings of rosacea, including midfacial papules, pustules, and rhinophyma. Ocular rosacea is most frequently diagnosed when cutaneous signs and symptoms of the condition are also present. However, ocular signs and symptoms may occur prior to cutaneous manifestations in 20% of patients with rosacea. No correlation exists between the severity of ocular disease and the severity of facial rosacea.
Ocular manifestations are essentially confined to the eyelids and ocular surface.[5, 6] Problems range from minor irritation, dryness, and blurry vision to potentially severe ocular surface disruption and inflammatory keratitis. Blepharitis and conjunctivitis are the most common findings in patients with ocular rosacea. Other ocular findings include lid margin and conjunctival telangiectasias, eyelid thickening, eyelid crusts and scales, chalazia and hordeolum, punctate epithelial erosions, corneal infiltrates, corneal ulcers, corneal scars, and vascularization. Sight-threatening disease is rare with rosacea; however, keratitis can result in sterile corneal ulceration and eventual perforation if not treated aggressively.
The symptoms of rosacea can be treated effectively; however, rosacea is a chronic condition with exacerbations and remissions, which requires long-term therapy to maintain symptomatic control.
Pathophysiology
The precise pathophysiology of rosacea remains unknown.[7, 8] Rosacea manifests itself primarily as a cutaneous vascular disorder; however, inflammatory changes are a hallmark of severe rosacea. Rosacea may be thought of as a disease spectrum with 2 primary etiologic components, vascular and inflammatory. Studies suggest an altered innate immune response as an underlying mechanism for the vascular and immune manifestations of rosacea.[9] The earliest manifestations of the disease are cutaneous vascular dilatory changes with subsequent increased blood flow in the form of telangiectasias and erythema. Sunlight-induced small vessel damage may contribute to this underlying vascular instability.
The later stages of rosacea are marked by inflammatory changes in the form of papules and pustules in the midface, rhinophyma (bullous nose), blepharitis and meibomitis, and corneal vascularization. A type 4, cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction has been hypothesized as a possible mechanism. Demodex mites also have been implicated as a possible inflammatory stimulus. Additionally, Helicobacter pylori has been postulated to be a causative factor in a subset of patients. Whatever the underlying mechanism, there is a fundamental abnormality in the sebaceous glands of the face and eyelids, which leads to the inflammatory changes exhibited.
Epidemiology
Frequency
United States
More than 10% of the general population exhibits dermatologic characteristics of rosacea; of these, up to 60% experience ocular complications.
International
An epidemiological study in Sweden showed a 10% prevalence of rosacea.[10] A study in Estonia showed a 22% prevalence rate of rosacea, as determined by the American National Rosacea Society Expert Committee (NRSEC) classification.[11]
Mortality/Morbidity
Rosacea is not a life-threatening disease. Approximately 5% of patients with rosacea manifest corneal disease, which may be severe and can lead to blindness via corneal ulceration, perforation, secondary infections, or corneal opacification from complete vascularization.
Race
Rosacea is recognized much more commonly in fair-skinned, white patients but also occurs in other populations and actually may be underreported, rather than less prevalent, in races with increased skin pigmentation.
Sex
Women are affected with rosacea twice as often as men; however, disease manifestations, especially rhinophyma, are frequently more severe in men than in women. The occurrence of ocular manifestations is approximately equal between men and women.
Age
All ages can be affected, including pediatric patients.[12] Peak incidence occurs in the fourth to seventh decades.
Buechner SA. Rosacea: an update. Dermatology. 2005;210(2):100-8. [Medline].
Knox CM, Smolin G. Rosacea. Int Ophthalmol Clin. Spring 1997;37(2):29-40. [Medline].
Powell FC. Clinical practice. Rosacea. N Engl J Med. Feb 24 2005;352(8):793-803. [Medline].
Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M, et al. Standard classification of rosacea: Report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the Classification and Staging of Rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. Apr 2002;46(4):584-7. [Medline].
Akpek EK, Merchant A, Pinar V, Foster CS. Ocular rosacea: patient characteristics and follow-up. Ophthalmology. Nov 1997;104(11):1863-7. [Medline].
Browning DJ, Proia AD. Ocular rosacea. Surv Ophthalmol. Nov-Dec 1986;31(3):145-58. [Medline].
Wilkin JK. Rosacea. Pathophysiology and treatment. Arch Dermatol. Mar 1994;130(3):359-62. [Medline].
Tisma VS, Basta-Juzbasic A, Jaganjac M, et al. Oxidative stress and ferritin expression in the skin of patients with rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 2009;60(2):270-6. [Medline].
Sobottka A, Lehmann P. Rosacea 2009 : new advances in pathophysiology, clinical staging and therapeutic strategies. Hautarzt. Dec 2009;60(12):999-1009. [Medline].
Berg M, Liden S. An epidemiological study of rosacea. Acta Derm Venereol. 1989;69(5):419-23. [Medline].
Abram K, Silm H, Oona M. Prevalence of rosacea in an Estonian working population using a standard classification. Acta Derm Venereol. May 2010;90(3):269-73. [Medline].
Chamaillard M, Mortemousque B, Boralevi F, et al. Cutaneous and ocular signs of childhood rosacea. Arch Dermatol. Feb 2008;144(2):167-71. [Medline].
Viso E, Rodriguez-Ares MT, Gude F. Prevalence of and associated factors for dry eye in a Spanish adult population (the Salnes Eye Study). Ophthalmic Epidemiol. Jan-Feb 2009;16(1):15-21. [Medline].
Icasiano E, Latkany R, Speaker M. Chronic epiphora secondary to ocular rosacea. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. May-Jun 2008;24(3):249. [Medline].
Frucht-Pery J, Sagi E, Hemo I, Ever-Hadani P. Efficacy of doxycycline and tetracycline in ocular rosacea. Am J Ophthalmol. Jul 15 1993;116(1):88-92. [Medline].
Abram K, Silm H, Maaroos HI, Oona M. Risk factors associated with rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. May 2010;24(5):565-71. [Medline].
Breton AL, Truchetet F, Veran Y, et al. Prevalence analysis of smoking in rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. Sep 2011;25(9):1112-3. [Medline].
Modi S, Harting M, Rosen T. Azithromycin as an alternative rosacea therapy when tetracyclines prove problematic. J Drugs Dermatol. Sep 2008;7(9):898-9. [Medline].
Alikhan A, Kurek L, Feldman SR. The role of tetracyclines in rosacea. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2010;11(2):79-87. [Medline].
Barnhorst DA Jr, Foster JA, Chern KC, Meisler DM. The efficacy of topical metronidazole in the treatment of ocular rosacea. Ophthalmology. Nov 1996;103(11):1880-3. [Medline].
Luchs J. Azithromycin in DuraSite for the treatment of blepharitis. Clin Ophthalmol. Jul 30 2010;4:681-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Torresani C. Clarithromycin: a new perspective in rosacea treatment. Int J Dermatol. May 1998;37(5):347-9. [Medline].

