eMedicine Specialties > Ophthalmology > Extraocular Muscles
Esotropia, Acquired: Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Oct 16, 2006
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
Differential Diagnoses
Workup
Imaging Studies
- Consider neuroimaging studies in the absence of expected findings (eg, hypermetropia) or fusion potential or in the presence of atypical features or neurologic signs.
- CT scan of orbits - Axial and coronal views, 3-mm cuts
- Evaluation of fractures
- Assessment of potential extraocular muscle entrapment
- Presence of orbital mass
- Chest x-ray
- Lung nodules suggestive of lung carcinoma
- May identify suspicious breast lesion
- CT scan of neck/thorax/abdomen - To evaluate for systemic malignancy
- B-scan ultrasonography - If any doubt of globe integrity
- Radiographic imaging studies (eg, MRI of brain and brainstem) if neurologic signs or craniofacial anomalies are present
Other Tests
- Bagolini striated glasses test
- Most tests for fusion, suppression, and Anomalous Retinal Correspondence (ARC) create artificial viewing circumstances. Normally, the visual environment is not that of a red filter in front of one eye or a combination of red-green filters; separately viewed slides in illuminated tubes are nothing more than a laboratory analysis of retinal correspondence.
- The striated glasses popularized by Bagolini allow the patient to view the normal visual environment with a faint reference line placed on the background viewed by each eye. The reference line for each eye is placed at right angles by arranging the glasses in the trial frame so that the striations before the right eye and the left eye are perpendicular to each other. For example, the striations are placed at 135° in the trial frame in front of the right eye and at 45° in front of the left eye. The patient views a fixation light at any distance chosen by the examiner; ordinary room illumination is maintained. The patient reports on the fixation light and observed streaks extending out into the peripheral field of vision.
- Patients with esotropia of 10 D or more give varied responses, depending on whether they have Normal Retinal Correspondence (NRC), ARC monocular vision, or an absence of binocular vision.
- The esotropic patient with NRC sees 2 fixation lights in homonymous diplopia, with a separate streak through each lens and without a break in either streak. Compensating for the esotropic angle with base-out prisms eliminates the diplopic fixation light, and the streaks then intersect at the fixation light.
- The patient with ARC and suppression sees 1 fixation light and 2 streaks forming an X; after being questioned, the patient recognizes the suppression scotoma projecting from the nasal retina of the deviated eye as a gap of 5-6° around the fixation light in the streak seen by that eye.
- The scotoma can be studied further by removing the striated glass from in front of the fixating eye and slowly rotating the striated glass before the nonfixating eye. As the streak rotates, the gap in the streak around the fixation light persists, beautifully outlining the scotoma for 360°. Furthermore, ARC is made evident by the patient's claim that the streak seen by the deviated eye passes through the fixation light as the patient mentally connects the 2 ends of the gap in this streak. When the light is held in front of the eyes, base-out prism power equal to the esotropic deviation produces crossed diplopia for the fixation light, and each light has its separate streak passing through it.
- The patient devoid of single binocular vision sees only 1 light and 1 streak. The patient may claim to see 2 streaks if rapidly alternating but will admit under questioning that the 2 streaks are not perceived simultaneously.
- The patient with exotropia of 10 D or more may report NRC with heteronymous diplopia, ARC with suppression, or an absence of binocular vision.
- The large profound scotoma of the temporal retina, extending up to the hemiretinal line in the exotropic patient with ARC, prevents all but the best observers from appreciating the extremely peripheral small streak seen outside the suppression scotoma of the deviated eye. Consequently, many exotropic patients report seeing only 1 streak.
- Those patients who can detect the small peripheral ends of the streak describe the ends on the axis that coincides with the light, supporting the diagnosis of ARC. Furthermore, base-in prism power placed in front of the eyes that equals the deviation angle creates homonymous diplopia of the fixation light, each image having a separate streak.
- The Bagolini striated glasses test requires a degree of maturity that seldom is found in a child younger than 8 years. Describing or drawing the suppression scotoma gap in 1 of the streaks presents great difficulty to the young child.
More on Esotropia, Acquired |
| Overview: Esotropia, Acquired |
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Esotropia, Acquired |
| Treatment & Medication: Esotropia, Acquired |
| Follow-up: Esotropia, Acquired |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Clark AC, Nelson LB, Simon JW. Acute acquired comitant esotropia. Br J Ophthalmol. Aug 1989;73(8):636-8. [Medline].
Clark RA, Ariyasu R, Demer JL. Medial rectus pulley posterior fixation: a novel technique to augment recession. J AAPOS. Oct 2004;8(5):451-6. [Medline].
Costello PA, Simon JW, Jia Y, Lininger LL. Acquired esotropia: subjective and objective outcomes. J AAPOS. Jun 2001;5(3):193-7. [Medline].
Firth AY. Heroin and diplopia. Addiction. Jan 2005;100(1):46-50. [Medline].
Fukai S, Arai N, Hayakawa T, Kimura H. Studies on the botulinum therapy for esotropia improvement of retinal correspondence. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. Jun 1993;97(6):757-62. [Medline].
Goldman HD, Nelson LB. Acute acquired comitant esotropia. Ann Ophthalmol. Dec 1985;17(12):777-8. [Medline].
Jang GJ, Park MR, Park SC. Bilateral lateral rectus resection in patients with residual esotropia. Korean J Ophthalmol. Dec 2004;18(2):161-7. [Medline].
Kittleman WT, Mazow ML. Reoperations in esotropia surgery. Ann Ophthalmol. May 1986;18(5):174-7. [Medline].
Ludwig IH, Smith JF. Presumed sinus-related strabismus. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004;102:159-65; discussion 165-7. [Medline].
Lyons CJ, Tiffin PA, Oystreck D. Acute acquired comitant esotropia: a prospective study. Eye. Oct 1999;13 (Pt 5):617-20. [Medline].
Mohney BG. Common forms of childhood esotropia. Ophthalmology. Apr 2001;108(4):805-9. [Medline].
Mohney BG. Acquired nonaccommodative esotropia in childhood. J AAPOS. Apr 2001;5(2):85-9. [Medline].
Repka MX, Wentworth D. Predictors of prism response during prism adaptation. Prism Adaptation Study Research Group. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. Jul-Aug 1991;28(4):202-5. [Medline].
Thomas AH. Divergence insufficiency. J AAPOS. Dec 2000;4(6):359-61. [Medline].
Troost BT, Abel L, Noreika J, Genovese FM. Acquired cyclic esotropia in an adult. Am J Ophthalmol. Jan 1981;91(1):8-13. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
acquired esotropia, acute esotropia, cyclic esotropia, progressive esotropia with myopia, nonaccommodative esodeviation, acquired nonaccommodative esotropia, ANAET, esotropia associated with impaired sight, sixth nerve palsy, abducens nerve palsy, infantile esotropia, diplopia, concomitant esotropia, atypical strabismus,
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Esotropia, Acquired