Updated: Feb 11, 2009
Glaucoma associated with aphakia, but particularly pseudophakia, are important considerations given the more than 1.25 million cataract surgeries performed each year.
Glaucoma in this article refers to conditions that cause increased intraocular pressure (IOP) soon after surgery as well as to those conditions that occur much later. Examples include viscoelastic-associated pressure rise measured in hours to ghost cell glaucoma occurring weeks after surgery.
The pathophysiology is dependent on the mechanism involved and includes the following: distortion of the anterior chamber angle, viscoelastics, inflammation, hemorrhage, pigment dispersion, ghost cell, vitreous in the anterior chamber (AC), pupillary block (pseudophakic/aphakic), malignant glaucoma, and posterior capsulotomy.
Duke-Elder estimated a 12% incidence of postoperative glaucoma in 1969.1 However, the landscape of postcataract complications has been altered by the advent of the intraocular lens (IOL) and fine wound-closure techniques. In the modern era, the incidence of glaucoma is dependent on both the methodology and the type of IOL used.
For instance, Cinotti has noted an increased incidence of glaucoma after extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) (7.5%) as compared to intracapsular cataract extraction (ICCE) (5.7%).2
Further, Stark has noted that AC IOL (5.5-6.3%) has been associated with an increased incidence of postoperative IOP elevation over iris-fixation (3.9-4.3%) lens and posterior chamber (PC) IOL (1.6-3.5%).3 These figures are consistent with those reported by Hoskins, in which he observed 5.5% in AC IOL and 1.6% in PC IOL.4 However, congenital cataract surgeries are associated with a higher incidence of glaucoma, and data range from 6.1-24%.
Without good IOP control, glaucoma may result in blindness.
This condition may occur at any age after cataract surgery; however, cataracts are most commonly found in the elderly population.
The history is dependent on the specific cause of the pressure rise. In general, inquiry into the patient's phakic status as well as the operative course and the use/removal of viscoelastic substances are important historical considerations. For instance, a patient with pseudophakic pupillary block may present with a recent history of cataract surgery complaining of intense pain, red eyes, hazy cornea, and headache.
Also, remember that the clinical presentation may be identical to that of phakic patients and that the specific diagnosis may depend on the historical features described above.
The ocular examination reveals increased IOP with the accompanying symptoms.
| Glaucoma, Angle Closure, Acute | Glaucoma, Plateau Iris |
| Glaucoma, Angle Closure, Chronic | Glaucoma, Primary Open Angle |
| Glaucoma, Drug-Induced | Glaucoma, Pseudoexfoliation |
| Glaucoma, Hyphema | Glaucoma, Uveitic |
| Glaucoma, Lens-Particle | |
| Glaucoma, Malignant | |
| Glaucoma, Pigmentary |
Management is dependent largely on the mechanism of the glaucoma. In both aphakic/pseudophakic pupillary block, the initial treatment is mydriasis. This is used to either break the block or enlarge the pupil beyond the edges of the AC IOL. Temporizing measures include aqueous suppressants and hyperosmotics. Miotics can help in the long-term management after the acute phase. Epinephrine is avoided because of the risk of macular edema. Ultimately, iridotomy usually is needed in both cases. In aphakia, the iridotomy must be placed over a pocket of aqueous behind the iris, and this may require multiple attempts. Other options include trabeculoplasty, cyclophotocoagulation, and pars plana vitrectomy.
Preoperatively, the use of external pressure reducers to maintain AC depth and to minimize potential complications (eg, vitreous loss, expulsive hemorrhage) may be considered. However, potential adverse effects of optic nerve atrophy or arterial occlusion must be considered. Careful use of epinephrine in local anesthetic may help to preserve perfusion to the optic nerve.
Judicious use of a viscoelastic substance may help to control a postoperative rise in IOP, whereas carbachol and acetylcholine have both been shown to decrease IOP postoperatively. Notably, carbachol was associated with decreased IOP at 24 hours, 2 days, and 3 days postoperatively. Further, the choice of IOL may influence the postoperative course.
Although dictated by the clinical scenario, one may remember the increased incidence of glaucoma with the early generation AC IOL and iris-fixation lens as compared to the PC IOL. Special attention must be devoted to patients with complicating factors (eg, corneal endothelial cell loss, fibrous endothelial metaplasia, angle cicatrization). A decrease in intraoperative trauma and complications would allow the surgeon increased flexibility in the choice of IOL.
Further, Bomer found a correlation between the surgeon's experience and the rise in postoperative IOP.8 Increased IOP has been noted within 6-7 hours postoperatively and usually returns to normal in 1 week. A modest increase in the IOP poses minimal threat in the nonglaucomatous eye; but, if clinically warranted, beta-blockers, acetazolamide, and apraclonidine have been shown to be of benefit. Of these, apraclonidine is more effective if given 1 hour preoperatively. Further, pilocarpine gel also was shown to be effective, although attention must be paid to inflammation.
Both argon and Nd:YAG lasers can be used in pupillary block and help to distinguish it from aqueous misdirection. Argon laser trabeculoplasty benefit both pseudophakic and aphakic populations, and it may delay the need for surgical intervention by 18 months, although 36-month follow-up examinations were not encouraging.
Iridoplasty is used to alter the peripheral iris morphology when iridotomy cannot be performed. For instance, shrinking the peripheral iris deepens the AC in iridocorneal touch. The posterior capsule needs to be broken to establish communication between the retrocapsular space and the AC. This technique is helpful in retrocapsular pupillary block or anterior aqueous misdirection.
Posterior aqueous misdirection involves deposition of aqueous fluid in the vitreous cavity and is relieved with vitreolysis using Nd:YAG laser. Cyclodestructive therapy using laser (argon and Nd:YAG) or ultrasound has been described. Generally reserved for patients who have failed other therapies, cyclodestructive therapy is performed using transpupillary, endophotocoagulation, and transscleral approaches. Noureddin compared Nd:YAG cyclocoagulation to filtering procedures and showed that, although both reduced IOP significantly, fewer medications were needed postoperatively in the filtering procedure group.9
Incisional approaches include filtering procedures and drainage implant devices. Filtering procedures are divided into full-thickness and partial-thickness procedures. Although the full-thickness approach is theoretically superior, study data have ranged from no difference in IOP control to higher complication rates when compared to partial-thickness approaches even when using 5-FU. Shields, on the other hand, notes that trabeculectomy has been associated with increased efficacy and safety.6 However, aphakic eyes are associated with an increased incidence of complications and lower efficacy than phakic eyes. Nonpenetrating trabeculectomy (viscocanalostomy) has gained popularity, but no data are available comparing aphakic/phakic/pseudophakic populations.
Artificial drainage implants are divided into valved and nonvalved types. These are especially useful when the likelihood of success from filtering procedures is low. Shields reports a 70% success rate with aphakic and pseudophakic populations with a decline to 50% over 5 years, which is consistent with other reported values.6
The goals of pharmacotherapy are to reduce morbidity and to prevent complications.
The exact mechanism of ocular antihypertensive action is not established, but it appears to be a reduction of aqueous humor production or inhibition of inflow.
May reduce elevated and normal IOP, with or without glaucoma, possibly by inhibiting inflow.
1 gtt bid
Not established
May cause bradycardia and asystole when used in combination with systemic beta-blockers (may cause additive effects)
Documented hypersensitivity; bronchial asthma; sinus bradycardia; second- and third-degree AV block; severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; overt cardiac failure; cardiogenic shock
C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Product may have sulfites, which may cause allergic-type reactions in susceptible patients; may exacerbate or precipitate heart block, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mental changes (especially in elderly patients)
Decrease IOP possibly by reducing aqueous humor production.
Reduces elevated, as well as normal, IOP whether or not accompanied by glaucoma. Apraclonidine is a relatively selective alpha-adrenergic agonist that does not have significant local anesthetic activity. Has minimal cardiovascular effects.
1-2 gtt bid
Not established
Monitor pulse and BP frequently when giving cardiovascular drugs; not for use concurrently with MAOIs
Documented hypersensitivity; patients on MAOIs or have taken them in the past 14 d
C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
May exacerbate or precipitate ocular irritation, topical sensitivity, vasovagal attack, and optic nerve ischemia in patients with advanced glaucomatous optic neuropathy
Stimulate muscarinic receptors, causing miosis in the eye and may reduce aqueous humor outflow.
Directly stimulates cholinergic receptors in the eye, decreasing resistance to aqueous humor outflow.
Instillation frequency and concentration are determined by patient's response. Individuals with heavily pigmented irides may require higher strengths.
Patients may be maintained on pilocarpine as long as IOP is controlled and there is no deterioration in visual fields. May use alone or in combination with other miotics, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, epinephrine, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, or hyperosmotic agents to decrease IOP.
0.5-inch ribbon in lower conjunctival sac of affected eye(s) hs
Not established
May be ineffective when used concomitantly with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents
Documented hypersensitivity; acute inflammatory disease of anterior chamber
C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Caution in acute cardiac failure, peptic ulcer, hyperthyroidism, GI spasm, bronchial asthma, Parkinson disease, recent MI, urinary tract obstruction, and hypertension or hypotension
Direct acting cholinergic agent that lowers IOP.
1-2 gtt bid
Not established
None reported
Documented hypersensitivity; acute inflammatory disease of anterior chamber; acute iritis
C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Caution in corneal abrasion and in patients undergoing general anesthesia
Carbonic anhydrase (CA) is an enzyme found in many tissues of the body, including the eye. Catalyzes a reversible reaction where carbon dioxide becomes hydrated and carbonic acid dehydrated.
By slowing the formation of bicarbonate ions with subsequent reduction in sodium and fluid transport it may inhibit CA in the ciliary processes of the eye. This effect decreases aqueous humor secretion, reducing IOP.
Inhibits enzyme CA, reducing rate of aqueous humor formation, which, in turn, reduces IOP. Used for adjunctive treatment of chronic simple (open-angle) glaucoma and secondary glaucoma and preoperatively in acute angle-closure glaucoma when delay of surgery desired to lower IOP.
500 mg cap (sequels) PO bid or 250 mg tab PO qid
Not established
Can decrease therapeutic levels of lithium and alter excretion of drugs (amphetamines, quinidine, phenobarbital, salicylates) by alkalinizing urine
Documented hypersensitivity; hepatic disease; severe renal disease; adrenocortical insufficiency; severe pulmonary obstruction
C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Patients with impaired hepatic function may go into coma; may cause substantial increase in blood glucose in some diabetic patients
Increase uveoscleral outflow of the aqueous. One mechanism of action may be through induction of metalloproteinases in ciliary body, which breaks down extracellular matrix, thereby reducing resistance to outflow through ciliary body.
Decreases IOP by increasing outflow of aqueous humor.
1 gtt (1.5 mcg) in affected eye qd in evening; higher frequency administrations may decrease effectiveness
Not established
Coadministration with eye drops, containing the preservative thimerosal, may reduce effects (administer at intervals of 5 min between applications)
Documented hypersensitivity
C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Do not administer while wearing contact lenses; may increase brown pigment in iris and change eye color gradually (unknown effect)
Prostaglandin agonist that selectively mimics effects of naturally occurring substances, prostamides. Exact mechanism of action unknown but believed to reduce IOP by increasing outflow of aqueous humor through trabecular meshwork and uveoscleral routes. Used to reduce IOP in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
1 gtt in affected eye(s) hs; not to exceed 1 dose/d
Not established
None reported
Documented hypersensitivity; signs of inflammation
C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
May cause permanent increase in pigment to iris (ie, increases brown pigment) and eyelid; eyelash growth may increase; bacterial keratitis may occur; caution in uveitis or macular edema; do not instill if wearing contact lenses
Prostaglandin F2-alpha analog and selective FP prostanoid receptor agonist. Exact mechanism of action unknown but believed to reduce IOP by increasing uveoscleral outflow.
1 gtt in affected eye(s) hs; not to exceed 1 dose/d
Not established
None reported
Documented hypersensitivity; pregnancy; signs of inflammation
C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Commonly causes ocular hyperemia; may cause permanent increase in pigment to iris (ie, increases brown pigment) and eyelid; eyelash growth may increase; bacterial keratitis may occur; caution in uveitis or macular edema; do not instill if wearing contact lenses
Duke-Elder S. Disease of the lens and vitreous: glaucoma and hypotony. In: System of Ophthalmology. Vol 11. 1969:11.
Cinotti AA, Jacobson JH. Complications following cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1953;36:929.
Stark WJ, Worthen DM, Holladay JT, et al. The FDA report on intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. Apr 1983;90(4):311-17. [Medline].
Hoskins HD Jr. Management of pseudophakic glaucoma. In: Greve EL, ed. Surgical Management of Coexisting Glaucoma and Cataract. 1987.
Epstein DL, Allingham RR, Schuman JS. Chandler and Grant's Glaucoma. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins;1997.
Shields MB. Textbook of Glaucoma. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1998.
Kirsch RE, Levine O, Singer JA. Ridge at internal edge of cataract incision. Arch Ophthalmol. Dec 1976;94(12):2098-2104. [Medline].
Bömer TG, Lagreze WD, Funk J. Intraocular pressure rise after phacoemulsification with posterior chamber lens implantation: effect of prophylactic medication, wound closure, and surgeon's experience. Br J Ophthalmol. Sep 1995;79(9):809-13. [Medline].
Noureddin BN, Wilson-Holt N, Lavin M, et al. Advanced uncontrolled glaucoma. Nd:YAG cyclophotocoagulation or tube surgery. Ophthalmology. Mar 1992;99(3):430-6; discussion 437. [Medline].
Altintas O, Yuksel N, Karabas VL, Demirci G. Cystoid macular edema associated with latanoprost after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. Jan-Feb 2005;15(1):158-61. [Medline].
Araie M, Ishi K. Effects of apraclonidine on intraocular pressure and blood-aqueous barrier permeability after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. Jul 15 1993;116(1):67-71. [Medline].
Arcieri ES, Santana A, Rocha FN, Guapo GL, Costa VP. Blood-aqueous barrier changes after the use of prostaglandin analogues in patients with pseudophakia and aphakia: a 6-month randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol. Feb 2005;123(2):186-92. [Medline].
Arvind H, George R, Raju P, et al. Glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia in the Chennai Glaucoma Study. Br J Ophthalmol. Jun 2005;89(6):699-703. [Medline].
Barnes EA, Murdoch IE, Subramaniam S, Cahill A, Kehoe B, Behrend M. Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy and intraocular pressure in pseudophakic patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. Jul 2004;111(7):1393-7. [Medline].
Berson FG, Patterson MM, Epstein DL. Obstruction of aqueous outflow by sodium hyaluronate in enucleated human eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. May 1983;95(5):668-72. [Medline].
Brown DN. Long-term success of argon laser trabeculoplasty in aphakic and pseudophakic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:1159.
Carter BC, Plager DA, Neely DE, Sprunger DT, Sondhi N, Roberts GJ. Endoscopic diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the management of aphakic and pseudophakic glaucoma in children. J AAPOS. Feb 2007;11(1):34-40. [Medline].
Ellingson FT. The uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome associated with the Mark VIII anterior chamber lens implant. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. Apr 1978;4(2):50-3. [Medline].
Fontana H, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in pseudophakic patients with open-angle glaucoma: outcomes and risk factors for failure. Am J Ophthalmol. Apr 2006;141(4):652-9. [Medline].
Harrison SE, Soll DB, Shayegan M, Clinch T. A new and effective protective agent for intraocular lens insertion. Ophthalmology. Nov 1982;89(11):1254-60. [Medline].
Lee LC, Pasquale LR. Surgical management of glaucoma in pseudophakic patients. Semin Ophthalmol. Sep-Dec 2002;17(3-4):131-7. [Medline].
Lima FE, Magacho L, Carvalho DM, Susanna R Jr, Avila MP. A prospective, comparative study between endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and the Ahmed drainage implant in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma. Jun 2004;13(3):233-7. [Medline].
Minckler DS, Heuer DK, Hasty B, Baerveldt G, Cutting RC, Barlow WE. Clinical experience with the single-plate Molteno implant in complicated glaucomas. Ophthalmology. Sep 1988;95(9):1181-8. [Medline].
Rockwood EJ, Parrish RK 2nd, Heuer DK, et al. Glaucoma filtering surgery with 5-fluorouracil. Ophthalmology. Sep 1987;94(9):1071-8. [Medline].
Ruiz RS, Rhem MN, Prager TC. Effects of carbachol and acetylcholine on intraocular pressure after cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. Jan 15 1989;107(1):7-10. [Medline].
Ruiz RS, Wilson CA, Musgrove KH, Prager TC. Management of increased intraocular pressure after cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. Apr 15 1987;103(4):487-91. [Medline].
Shingleton BJ, Alfano C, O'Donoghue MW, Rivera J. Efficacy of glaucoma filtration surgery in pseudophakic patients with or without conjunctival scarring. J Cataract Refract Surg. Dec 2004;30(12):2504-9. [Medline].
Simon JW, O'Malley MR, Gandham SB, Ghaiy R, Zobal-Ratner J, Simmons ST. Central corneal thickness and glaucoma in aphakic and pseudophakic children. J AAPOS. Aug 2005;9(4):326-9. [Medline].
Simon JW, O'Malley MR, Gandham SB, Ghaiy R, Zobal-Ratner J, Simmons ST. Central corneal thickness and glaucoma in aphakic and pseudophakic children. J AAPOS. Aug 2005;9(4):326-9. [Medline].
Simsek T, Mutluay AH, Elgin U, Gursel R, Batman A. Glaucoma and increased central corneal thickness in aphakic and pseudophakic patients after congenital cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. Sep 2006;90(9):1103-6. [Medline].
Valmaggia C, de Smet M. Endoscopic laser coagulation of the ciliary processes in patients with severe chronic glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. May 2004;221(5):343-6. [Medline].
glaucoma, aphakia, pseudophakia, aphakic, pseudophakic, intraocular pressure, IOP, open angle, closed angle, vision loss, visual deficit
Robert H Graham, MD, Senior Associate Consultant, Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
Robert H Graham, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Medical Association, and Arizona Ophthalmological Society
Disclosure: WebMD/eMedicine Salary Employment
Bradford Shingleton, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School; Consulting Staff, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Bradford Shingleton, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American Academy of Ophthalmology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Simon K Law, MD, PharmD, Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute; Chief of Section of Ophthalmology Surgical Services, Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare Center, West Los Angeles
Simon K Law, MD, PharmD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Glaucoma Society, and Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Martin B Wax, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Vice President, Ophthalmology Research and Development, Head, Ophthalmology Discovery Research, Alcon Labs, Inc
Martin B Wax, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Glaucoma Society, and Society for Neuroscience
Disclosure: Alcon Labs Salary Employment
Lance L Brown, OD, MD, Ophthalmologist, Affiliated With Freeman Hospital and St John's Hospital, Regional Eye Center, Joplin, Missouri
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Hampton Roy Sr, MD, Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Hampton Roy Sr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American College of Surgeons, and Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous coauthors, Sai Gandham, MD, and DooHo Brian Kim, BA, to the development and writing of this article.
Further Reading© 1994-
by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)