eMedicine Specialties > Ophthalmology > Neurologic Disorders

Multiple Sclerosis: Differential Diagnoses & Workup

Author: Andrew G Lee, MD, Professor, Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Coauthor(s): Fiona Costello, MD, FRCP, Assistant Professor, Departments of Ophthalmology and Medicine (Neurology), Neuro-ophthalmologist, Clinical Neurologist and Clinical Investigator, University of Ottawa; Cecil L Berlie, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Ophthalmology, Luther Midelfort Eye Clinic
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jan 26, 2007

Differential Diagnoses

Other Problems to Be Considered

Ischemic optic neuropathy: The major differential in a case of unilateral and acute optic neuropathy with optic disc edema is either ON or ischemic optic neuropathy. Typically, a younger patient has ON, and an older patient has anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION). Although the visual loss is sudden in both ON and AION, pain is less likely to occur in AION unlike in ON, and only mild-to-moderate visual improvement occurs after AION. The disc swelling in AION is typically more severe than in ON, and associated hemorrhages and exudates are features that argue against demyelinating ON.

Infiltrative optic nerve processes: Leukemic infiltration and lymphomatous lesions may create symptoms and a disc appearance similar to that of ON. If a history of such a disorder exists, ruling out either a progression or a relapse of the lymphoproliferative condition is essential. An infiltrate that is visible on the disc head itself is often a clue regarding the underlying etiology. Inflammatory disorders (eg, sarcoid, lupus, other autoimmune disorders) can produce an inflammatory optic neuropathy. The presence of associated anterior or posterior uveitis, a steroid dependent or markedly steroid responsive course, and a history of systemic inflammatory disease are helpful in differentiating these conditions from ON. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful in these cases.

Graves disease: Although thyroid ophthalmopathy (Graves ophthalmopathy) may produce a compressive optic neuropathy, a gradual rather than an acute decrease in visual acuity typically occurs. Usually, the patient has a history of autoimmune thyroid disease and signs of thyroid orbitopathy (eg, upper lid retraction, lid lag, ophthalmoplegia, proptosis). Orbital imaging differentiates compressive optic neuropathy from Graves disease and from ON.

Intraorbital/intracranial compressive lesions: These lesions typically produce painless, progressive, compressive optic neuropathy (eg, optic nerve sheath and intracranial meningiomas, sellar lesions). Neuroimaging studies are important for all cases of atypical ON (eg, chronic ON, pituitary apoplexy, inflammatory or infiltrative ON).

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: This is a painless, progressive, and typically bilateral optic neuropathy that produces a central or cecocentral scotoma. The disorder is mitochondrially inherited and primarily affects young men.

Toxins and medications: Certain toxins and medications (eg, tobacco, ethanol, methanol, ethambutol, isoniazid, chloroquine, vitamin deficiencies, some anti-neoplastic agents) can produce an optic neuropathy. Typically, these patients have a bilateral and simultaneous central or cecocentral loss.

Neuromyelitis optica

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • In the ONTT, laboratory studies were not deemed helpful in establishing a diagnosis of typical demyelinating ON (ie, acute, unilateral optic neuropathy in a young patient with pain on extraocular movement and improvement over time).
  • Laboratory studies can be helpful in patients with features that are atypical for demyelinating ON. These laboratory studies should be performed as a directed evaluation based upon the history and physical examination findings.
    • Complete blood count (CBC)
    • Serum vitamin B-12 level and folate (eg, bilateral central scotoma)
    • Chest radiographs (eg, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis)
    • Lyme titers (eg, endemic area, tick exposure, rash)
    • Tuberculosis (TB) skin test (eg, TB exposure, endemic area)
    • Fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA) test (eg, syphilis)
    • Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test or rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test (eg, syphilis)
    • Antinuclear antibody (ANA) (eg, systemic lupus erythematosus)
    • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (eg, high-risk patients)
    • Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) level (eg, sarcoidosis)
    • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (eg, inflammatory disorders)
  • Although some interest has been shown in HLA typing in ON (eg, HLA-DR2, HLA-B7, HLA-Dr4, HLA-Dw2), the clinical utility of these tests remains unproven.

Imaging Studies

  • Typical cases of ON do not warrant extensive investigations. Advances in MRI techniques have improved the ability to visualize damage to the anterior visual axis. Yet the main role for cranial MRI is to identify the future risk of MS, as the presence of asymptomatic white matter lesions on the MRI is a predictor for this diagnosis.
  • The most important prognostic imaging study for the development of MS in patients with ON is a cranial MRI. MRI is superior to CT scanning for MS. Although secondary causes of ON, including neoplastic changes, granulomatous lesions, neuropathies, and other inflammatory conditions, may be seen on a cranial MRI, the major rationale for performing a cranial MRI is to evaluate demyelinating lesions.
  • In 2001, the International Panel on the Diagnosis of MS put forth the so-called McDonald criteria (named after Dr. Ian McDonald who chaired the panel). These criteria were intended to aid in the diagnostic evaluation of MS by incorporating MRI findings into the evaluation and diagnosis of the disease. According to Polman and colleagues, the McDonald criteria have been extensively assessed and used since 2001, and the 2005 revisions helped to simplify and speed diagnosis, while maintaining adequate sensitivity and specificity.
  • The lesions on an MRI are typically bright on T2-weighted imaging and can be highlighted by suppressing the normal cerebrospinal fluid signal using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR).
  • MS plaques are usually periventricular, ovoid in shape, large, and multiple. Involvement of the corpus callosum is particularly suggestive of demyelinating disease. Active MS plaques may show enhancement after gadolinium administration.
  • The optic nerve in ON often shows enhancement after contrast in T1-weighted MRI. Orbital fat suppression techniques might be useful for visualizing optic nerve enhancement involving the intraorbital portion of the optic nerve.
  • Although a high number of white matter lesions present on a cranial MRI are more suggestive of MS, even one white matter lesion may be significant. On the other hand, a normal MRI at onset lessens (<20%) the chance for future development of MS but does not exclude the possibility of MS.

Other Tests

  • Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are not typically necessary for patients with clear clinical evidence of ON. VEPs may be a valuable means of assessing any subclinical fellow eye involvement.

Procedures

  • In the ONTT, a lumbar puncture was optional and only showed evidence of demyelinating disease in patients with ON. The cerebrospinal fluid may be useful for diagnostic purposes in atypical cases of ON or in patients in whom a diagnosis of MS requires support from additional paraclinical evidence (eg, elevated immunoglobulin G [IgG] synthesis, oligoclonal bands).

Histologic Findings

The most common form of ON is a unilateral, idiopathic, inflammatory, demyelinative process involving neutrophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages, occurring either anterior or posterior to the lamina cribrosa. Although demyelination is a process that causes a mostly mononuclear infiltration of the perivascular spaces, initial examinations of the axons may show no structural changes until the disease has progressed.

Once the disease has progressed, inflammatory and cellular responses cause the breakdown of myelin into fat globules, thereby altering the structure of the nerve. Ingestion of fat droplets by macrophages causes the stimulation of astrocytes and the formation of glial tissue visualized as plaques on an MRI. This process is responsible for damaging neurons and increasing latency and transmission times along the axons. This process is also responsible for the formation of plaques visualized on T2-weighted imaging.

Thus, the pathologic findings in MS include inflammation, demyelination, and axonal loss. The degree of axonal loss may explain the lack of a complete recovery of function in patients with MS, especially after repeated attacks.

More on Multiple Sclerosis

Overview: Multiple Sclerosis
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Multiple Sclerosis
Treatment & Medication: Multiple Sclerosis
Follow-up: Multiple Sclerosis
References

References

  1. Beck RW, Cleary PA, Anderson MM Jr, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. The Optic Neuritis Study Group. N Engl J Med. Feb 27 1992;326(9):581-8. [Medline].

  2. Beck RW, Chandler DL, Cole SR, et al. Interferon beta-1a for early multiple sclerosis: CHAMPS trial subgroup analyses. Ann Neurol. Apr 2002;51(4):481-90. [Medline].

  3. Beck RW, Gal RL, Bhatti MT, et al. Visual function more than 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Am J Ophthalmol. Jan 2004;137(1):77-83. [Medline].

  4. Beck RW, Trobe JD, Moke PS, et al. High- and low-risk profiles for the development of multiple sclerosis within 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol. Jul 2003;121(7):944-9. [Medline].

  5. Bronnum-Hansen H, Koch-Henriksen N, Stenager E. Trends in survival and cause of death in Danish patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain. Apr 2004;127(Pt 4):844-50. [Medline].

  6. Confavreux C, Aimard G, Devic M. Course and prognosis of multiple sclerosis assessed by the computerized data processing of 349 patients. Brain. Jun 1980;103(2):281-300. [Medline].

  7. Dunker S, Wiegand W. Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in monosymptomatic optic neuritis. Ophthalmology. Nov 1996;103(11):1768-73. [Medline].

  8. Earl CJ. Some aspects of optic atrophy. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1964;84:215-26. [Medline].

  9. Fleishman JA, Beck RW, Linares OA, Klein JW. Deficits in visual function after resolution of optic neuritis. Ophthalmology. Aug 1987;94(8):1029-35. [Medline].

  10. Frohman EM, O'Suilleabhain P, Dewey RB Jr, et al. A new measure of dysconjugacy in INO: the first-pass amplitude. J Neurol Sci. Jun 15 2003;210(1-2):65-71. [Medline].

  11. Galetta SL. The controlled high risk Avonex multiple sclerosis trial (CHAMPS Study). J Neuroophthalmol. Dec 2001;21(4):292-5. [Medline].

  12. Goodin DS, Frohman EM, Garmany GP Jr, et al. Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the MS Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Neurology. Jan 22 2002;58(2):169-78. [Medline].

  13. Haegert DG, Marrosu MG. Genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. Dec 1994;36 Suppl 2:S204-10. [Medline].

  14. Hely MA, McManis PG, Doran TJ, et al. Acute optic neuritis: a prospective study of risk factors for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Oct 1986;49(10):1125-30. [Medline].

  15. Jacobs LD, Beck RW, Simon JH, et al. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. CHAMPS Study Group. N Engl J Med. Sep 28 2000;343(13):898-904. [Medline].

  16. Jacobs LD, Kaba SE, Miller CM, et al. Correlation of clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid findings in optic neuritis. Ann Neurol. Mar 1997;41(3):392-8. [Medline].

  17. Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet. Dec 11-17 2004;364(9451):2106-12. [Medline].

  18. Liu Z, Pelfrey CM, Cotleur A, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. Jan 1 2001;112(1-2):153-62. [Medline].

  19. McDonald WI. Acute optic neuritis. Br J Hosp Med. Jul 1977;18(1):42-8. [Medline].

  20. Milea D, Napolitano M, Dechy H, et al. Complete bilateral horizontal gaze paralysis disclosing multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Feb 2001;70(2):252-5. [Medline].

  21. Miller D, Barkhof F, Montalban X, et al. Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis, part I: natural history, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis. Lancet Neurol. May 2005;4(5):281-8. [Medline].

  22. Miller DH, Newton MR, van der Poel JC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve in optic neuritis. Neurology. Feb 1988;38(2):175-9. [Medline].

  23. Miller NR, Newman NJ. Optic neuritis. In: The Essentials: Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;1999: 196-220.

  24. Miller NR. Optic neuritis. In: Walsh & Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;1982: 227-48.

  25. Noseworthy JH. Management of multiple sclerosis: current trials and future options. Curr Opin Neurol. Jun 2003;16(3):289-97. [Medline].

  26. Optic Neuritis Study Group. The clinical profile of optic neuritis. Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Optic Neuritis Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. Dec 1991;109(12):1673-8. [Medline].

  27. Optic Neuritis Study Group. The 5-year risk of MS after optic neuritis. Experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Optic Neuritis Study Group. Neurology. Nov 1997;49(5):1404-13. [Medline].

  28. PRISMS Study Group. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group. Lancet. Nov 7 1998;352(9139):1498-504. [Medline].

  29. PRISMS Study Group. PRISMS-4: Long-term efficacy of interferon-beta-1a in relapsing MS. Neurology. Jun 26 2001;56(12):1628-36. [Medline].

  30. Panitch H, Goodin DS, Francis G, et al. Randomized, comparative study of interferon beta-1a treatment regimens in MS: The EVIDENCE Trial. Neurology. Nov 26 2002;59(10):1496-506. [Medline].

  31. Percy AK, Nobrega FT, Kurland LT. Optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. An epidemiologic study. Arch Ophthalmol. Feb 1972;87(2):135-9. [Medline].

  32. Pittock SJ, McClelland RL, Mayr WT, et al. Clinical implications of benign multiple sclerosis: a 20-year population-based follow-up study. Ann Neurol. Aug 2004;56(2):303-6. [Medline].

  33. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria". Ann Neurol. Dec 2005;58(6):840-6. [Medline].

  34. Sandberg-Wollheim M, Bynke H, Cronqvist S, et al. A long-term prospective study of optic neuritis: evaluation of risk factors. Ann Neurol. Apr 1990;27(4):386-93. [Medline].

  35. Soderstrom M, Ya-Ping J, Hillert J, Link H. Optic neuritis: prognosis for multiple sclerosis from MRI, CSF, and HLA findings. Neurology. Mar 1998;50(3):708-14. [Medline].

  36. Weinstock-Guttman B, Baier M, Stockton R, et al. Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials as a measure of visual pathway pathology in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. Oct 2003;9(5):529-34. [Medline].

  37. Wray SH. Optic neuritis. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, eds. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Vol 4. WB Saunders;1994: 2539-68.

Further Reading

Keywords

MS, neurologic disorder, optic neuritis, ON, optic nerve, nystagmus, internuclear ophthalmoplegia, INO

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Andrew G Lee, MD, Professor, Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Andrew G Lee, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Geriatrics Society, North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Fiona Costello, MD, FRCP, Assistant Professor, Departments of Ophthalmology and Medicine (Neurology), Neuro-ophthalmologist, Clinical Neurologist and Clinical Investigator, University of Ottawa
Fiona Costello, MD, FRCP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Medical Association, Canadian Medical Protective Association, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, Ontario Medical Association, and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Cecil L Berlie, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Ophthalmology, Luther Midelfort Eye Clinic
Cecil L Berlie, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Andrew W Lawton, MD, Medical Director of Neuro-Ophthalmology Service, Section of Ophthalmology, Baptist Eye Center, Baptist Health Medical Center
Andrew W Lawton, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, Arkansas Medical Society, and Southern Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Brian R Younge, MD, Professor of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine
Brian R Younge, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Ophthalmological Society, and North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Ralph Garzia, OD, Assistant Dean for Clinical Programs, Associate Professor, School of Optometry, University of Missouri at St Louis
Ralph Garzia, OD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Optometry and American Optometric Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Hampton Roy Sr, MD, Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Hampton Roy Sr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American College of Surgeons, and Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.