eMedicine Specialties > Ophthalmology > Refractive Disorders
Hyperopia and Presbyopia, Conductive Keratoplasty
Updated: Oct 24, 2008
Introduction
Although nonsurgical correction (ie, glasses, contact lenses) for patients with low-level hyperopia and presbyopia has been widely successful throughout the world, the surgical correctional procedures have been somewhat less accepted. (See History of the Procedure.) Conductive keratoplasty (CK), an advanced method for vision correction using controlled-release radiofrequency energy to gently reshape the cornea and to provide long-lasting vision correction, is now available for these patients.
History of the Procedure
Laser and laserlike surgical procedures for the correction of hyperopia have a checkered history.1,2,3,4,5,6 For this article, the discussion is limited to CK.
The history of CK for hyperopia began with Svyatoslav Fyodorov, MD, the inventor of radial keratotomy (RK). Fyodorov inserted a hot needle (nickel-chromium probe) at the peripheral cornea to induce shrinkage. This procedure was called hot needle keratoplasty; others referred to it as hot needle in the eye or HNE. Fyodorov encountered problems with consistency and maintenance of the temperature because the temperature (heated to as high as 600° C) went down as the hot needle entered the cornea (to a desired depth of up to 90% of corneal thickness). A scorching sound was produced each time the needle was applied on the cornea. The procedure resulted in an uneven application of heat, with the external cornea receiving more heat than the inner cornea.
Summit Laser then introduced its holmium:YAG laser, first successfully used by Theo Seiler, MD, in 1990 for contact laser thermal keratoplasty (LTK) for the correction of hyperopia of up to 5 diopters (D), which also eventually failed.
In 1995, Sunrise Technologies introduced its noncontact holmium laser (Hyperion LTK System) for hyperopic correction via LTK. The problems that beset this particular technology were also related to the regression associated with the unequal distribution of energy from the base to the apex.
Nonholmium types (CO2 lasers and diode lasers) of laser thermokeratoplasty options appeared in the market, also resulting in positive but transient effects.
Early attempts with hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (HPRK) were besieged by haze and regression.
The aforementioned procedures were successful in correcting some degree of hyperopia; however, long-term stability, vision quality, and patient comfort were not properly addressed. They were all instrumental as building blocks for the success of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), which currently provides excellent outcomes for low levels of hyperopia; low levels of hyperopia are classified as +3.00 D in the United States and up to +5.00 D in Canada.7,8,9
Mendez then discovered CK. This revolutionary procedure presents convincing advantages over hyperopic LASIK and hyperopic correction via LTK.10 CK uses high radiofrequency energy that is delivered with a thin metal tip in concentric rings of multiple spots around the corneal periphery, shrinking collagen and steepening the central cornea. Refractec manufactures and markets this technology.11,12,13,14
See related CME at LASIK Mostly Effective in Long-Term for Myopia of More Than -10 Diopter.
Problem
The central problem in the correction of hyperopia and presbyopia is the pressing challenge of steepening the central cornea.15
Current treatment modalities include excimer laser ablation of the corneal periphery via either photorefractive keratoplasty (PRK) or LASIK and shrinkage of collagen in a circular pattern in the corneal periphery (eg, LTK).16 Hyperopic LASIK has been described as widely successful for low levels of hyperopia; however, the risk of flap-related complications cannot be overlooked. Thermal keratoplasty alters corneal curvature by heating the stromal tissue and causing the shrinkage of collagen. An optimal collagen shrinkage profile is currently acceptable. Previous experience has shown that too low of a heat causes minimal effect, while excessive heat causes remodeling and regression of effect. Two methods of collagen shrinkage are available: application of laser energy (ie, LTK) and application of radiofrequency energy (ie, CK).17
Hyperopia
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Phase III clinical trials for CK included the following investigators: Asbell, McDonald, Maloney, Davidorf, Hersh, Manche, and Durrie.18 The study was a prospective multicenter clinical trial to evaluate both the safety and the effectiveness of the ViewPoint CK system for the correction of hyperopia using the CK procedure. The study design was consistent with FDA guidance for refractive surgery lasers and draft American National Standards Institute (ANSI) guidance regarding laser systems for corneal reshaping.
The aim of the study was for a full correction of spherical hyperopia (ie, target of plano). All the treatments were based on preoperative cycloplegic refraction spherical equivalent (CRSE). Eligible patients for the study included those in the range of +0.75 D to +3.25 D of spherical hyperopia, with -0.75 D or less of refractive cylinder, yielding +0.75 D to +3.00 D cycloplegic spherical equivalent.
The effective parameters included improvement in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), predictability, stability, and patient satisfaction.
Presbyopia
The FDA Phase III clinical trials for presbyopic application of CK included the following investigators: McDonald, Durrie, Asbell, Maloney, and Nichamin.19 The study was a prospective multicenter clinical trial to evaluate CK for the treatment of presbyopic symptoms in emmetropic and hyperopic eyes.
Frequency
Although numerous figures are reported in publications, the exact number of hyperopes in the world is unknown. Generally, hyperopia is believed to affect millions of persons in the United States and hundreds of millions of individuals around the world.
Of those individuals older than 50 years, 100% of them need corrective lenses for presbyopia.
Etiology
Errors in refraction may be inherited, and hyperopia may run in families. Presbyopia is a natural part of the aging process and affects everyone.
Pathophysiology
In CK, a controlled release of radiofrequency energy is delivered intrastromally via a probe tip (450 µm X 90 µm). Impedance of the corneal tissue results in a thermal effect.20,21 Thermal profile is homogeneous to approximately 80% of the depth of the cornea. The CK footprint has an average width of 405 µm and an average depth of 509 µm, as measured with ultrasonic biomicroscopy.
Presentation
At some point, most, if not all, patients with hyperopia complain of a reduction in vision. The degree of blur depends on the amount of refractive error present. Both near vision and distance vision may be affected. Age may affect the reduction in visual performance. Patients with mild hyperopia, who function well prior to the presbyopic years, begin to experience difficulty with near work once their age approaches 40 years. Visual improvement is excellent with appropriate correction.
Indications
Hyperopic indications
The basis for the initiation of CK as a surgical procedure includes hyperopia. Hyperopia, commonly referred to as farsightedness, is an error of refraction (EOR) in which an individual may not have any difficulty seeing objects that are distant but may have problems focusing on objects that are near. In some instances, farsighted individuals can see all objects clearly, but they notice the need to strain the eyes, albeit unnecessarily, to maintain focus.
This type of EOR occurs when the eyeball is too short or when the cornea is too flat. In hyperopia, rays of light focus behind the retina instead of on it. This results in poor vision because the focus of light is not directly on the retina where it should be for normal vision. This anatomical structure induces a constant physiologic attempt to make up for the problem and to focus images. Symptoms of hyperopia involve asthenopia, which can include eyestrain, blurred vision, or headache (especially when reading or at the end of the day). These symptoms can increase over time.
Farsightedness (hyperopia) is often confused with presbyopia, which is a normal development of the aging process. Presbyopia occurs when the lens inside the eye loses flexibility, thereby preventing accurate focusing on nearby objects. This condition is common in individuals by the age of 40 years, and all persons older than 50 years experience presbyopia. People with this condition may experience eye strain/fatigue when reading in poor lighting conditions or at the end of the day, have trouble (slow) in changing focus from distance to near, or need to constantly reposition (move away) reading material in an attempt to find the correct focus.22,23
CK hyperopic indications for use, as approved by the FDA, are as follows18 :
- CK treatment for the reduction of spherical hyperopia in the range of +0.75 D to +3.25 D of cycloplegic spherical hyperopia, with -0.75 D or less of refractive astigmatism, yielding +0.75 D to +3.00 D cycloplegic spherical equivalent
- CK treatment in patients with less than or equal to 0.50 D difference between preoperative manifest and cycloplegic refractions
- CK treatment in patients aged 40 years and older
Presbyopic indications
FDA supplemental approval of Refractec ViewPoint® CK System is for the temporary induction of myopia (-1.00 D to -2.00 D) to improve near vision in the nondominant eye of presbyopic hyperopes or presbyopic emmetropes, as follows19 :
- Via spherical hyperopic treatment of 1.00 D to 2.25 D
- In patients 40 years or older with a documented stability of refraction for the prior 12 months
- As demonstrated by a change of less than 0.50 D in spherical and cylindrical components of the manifest refraction
- With less than or equal to 0.75 D of cycloplegic refractive cylinder and with a successful preoperative trial of monovision or history of monovision wear (ie, dominant eye corrected for distance vision and nondominant eye corrected for near vision)
CK is an elective procedure with the alternatives including, but not limited to, the following:
- Reading glasses
- Bifocal eyeglasses
- Multifocal contact lenses
- Monovision contact lens wear
- Other refractive surgeries
Additional selection criteria
Suggested additional initial patient selection criteria for CK are as follows:
- Healthy, virgin cornea24,25,26
- Corneal pachymetry at least 560 µm at 6 mm
- Corneal curvature between 41-44 D
- Patient tolerance for monovision
- Accurate determination of eye dominance
- Good corrected binocular vision
- No implanted regulating medical devices
- Patient understanding that presbyopia is progressive, with the probability of requiring additional treatments in the future
Relevant Anatomy
In hyperopia, the axial length (measurement of the most anterior part of the cornea to the most posterior part of the sclera) of the eyeball is generally shorter than normal and/or the corneal diopteric strength is weaker (flatter curvature).
A transparent avascular tissue, the cornea is continuous with the opaque sclera and the semitransparent conjunctiva. The cornea is covered by tear film on its anterior surface and bathed by aqueous humor on its posterior surface.
In adults, the cornea measures 11-12 mm horizontally and 9-11 mm vertically. The average corneal thickness is 0.5 mm (500 µm) centrally and 0.7 mm (700 µm) peripherally.
Contraindications
Patients must meet the inclusion criteria to be considered a good candidate for CK. A few relative contraindications (exclusion criteria) exist for CK.
- Younger than 21 years
- Drastic changes in vision or eyeglass prescription within the past year.
- Ophthalmoscopic signs of progressive or unstable hyperopia
- Eye conditions, including the following: (1) anterior segment pathology, including +2NS cataracts; (2) residual, recurrent, active ocular or uncontrolled eyelid disease, or any corneal abnormality (ie, recurrent corneal erosion, severe basement membrane disease); (3) recurrent history of herpes zoster or herpes simplex keratitis; (4) glaucoma (steroid responsiveness, ocular hypertension, risk for angle closure, or with potentially occludable angles); (5) intractable keratoconjunctivitis sicca; (6) known hypersensitivity to concomitant medications; and (7) peripheral pachymetry reading of less than 560 µm (at 6 mm optical zone).
- Patient who underwent strabismus surgery or may develop strabismus after the CK procedure
- Physical conditions, including the following: (1) diabetes, diagnosed autoimmune disease, connective tissue disease, or clinically significant atopic syndrome; (2) pregnancy, breastfeeding, or plans of pregnancy; and (3) keloid formation history
- Use of systemic medications with significant ocular adverse effects
- Use of chronic systemic corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive therapy that may affect wound healing
- Any immunocompromised patients
- Patients who are using ophthalmic medications other than artificial tears for treatment of any ocular pathology
- Patients with implantable electrical devices (eg, pacemakers, defibrillators, cochlear implants)
More on Hyperopia and Presbyopia, Conductive Keratoplasty |
Overview: Hyperopia and Presbyopia, Conductive Keratoplasty |
| Workup: Hyperopia and Presbyopia, Conductive Keratoplasty |
| Treatment: Hyperopia and Presbyopia, Conductive Keratoplasty |
| Follow-up: Hyperopia and Presbyopia, Conductive Keratoplasty |
| Multimedia: Hyperopia and Presbyopia, Conductive Keratoplasty |
| References |
| Next Page » |
References
Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery: 2003 ISRS/AAO survey. J Refract Surg. Jan-Feb 2005;21(1):87-91. [Medline].
Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery: 2002 ISRS survey. J Refract Surg. May-Jun 2003;19(3):357-63. [Medline].
Duffey RJ, Leaming D. U.S. trends in refractive surgery: 2001 International Society of Refractive Surgery Survey. J Refract Surg. Mar-Apr 2002;18(2):185-8. [Medline].
Ocular Surgery News. Laser market provides valuable options for low levels of hyperopiaRegression may be a thing of the past as developments continue in laser and laser-like procedures for hyperopia. 2001;Available at: http://www.osnsupersite.com/. [Full Text].
Waring GO 4th, Durrie DS. Emerging trends for procedure selection in contemporary refractive surgery: consecutive review of 200 cases from a single center. J Refract Surg. Apr 2008;24(4):S419-23. [Medline].
Talley-Rostov A. Patient-centered care and refractive cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. Jan 2008;19(1):5-9. [Medline].
Ditzen K, Huschka H, Pieger S. LASIK for hyperopia. In: Burrato L, ed. LASIK Principles and Techniques. Vol 22. Slack Inc; 1998:269-75.
Klein S, Fry K, Hersh PS. Laser in situ keratomileusis after conductive keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. Mar 2004;30(3):702-5. [Medline].
Kymionis GD, Aslanides IM, Khoury AN, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual hyperopic astigmatism after conductive keratoplasty. J Refract Surg. May-Jun 2004;20(3):276-8. [Medline].
Ocular Surgery News. Thermal keratoplasty techniques face off at ISRS meeting. Top doctors discussed the pros and cons of three thermal keratoplasty techniques for hyperopia. 2002;Available at: http://www.osnsupersite.com/. [Full Text].
Fernandez-Suntay JP, Pineda R 2nd, Azar DT. Conductive keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol Clin. Winter 2004;44(1):161-8. [Medline].
Haw WW, Manche EE. Conductive keratoplasty and laser thermal keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2002;42(4):99-106. [Medline].
Huang B. Update on nonexcimer laser refractive surgery technique: conductive keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. Aug 2003;14(4):203-6. [Medline].
Rojas MC, Manche EE. Comparison of videokeratographic functional optical zones in conductive keratoplasty and laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia. J Refract Surg. May-Jun 2003;19(3):333-7. [Medline].
Asbell PA, Maloney RK, Davidorf J, et al. Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of hyperopia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:79-84; discussion 84-7. [Medline].
Dawson DG, Edelhauser HF, Grossniklaus HE. Long-term histopathologic findings in human corneal wounds after refractive surgical procedures. Am J Ophthalmol. Jan 2005;139(1):168-78. [Medline].
Wang TJ, Lo W, Hsueh CM, et al. Ex vivo multiphoton analysis of rabbit corneal wound healing following conductive keratoplasty. J Biomed Opt. May-Jun 2008;13(3):034019. [Medline].
McDonald M, Hersh P. A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the ViewPoint CK System for the Correction of Hyperopia Utilizing the Conductive Keratoplasty (CK) Procedure. FDA Protocol RCS-001-HYP. 2001;Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/briefing/3806b1_05_sponsor. [Full Text].
McDonald MB, Durrie D, Asbell P, et al. Treatment of presbyopia with conductive keratoplasty: six-month results of the 1-year United States FDA clinical trial. Cornea. Oct 2004;23(7):661-8. [Medline].
Berjano EJ, Alio JL, Saiz J. Modeling for radio-frequency conductive keratoplasty: implications for the maximum temperature reached in the cornea. Physiol Meas. Jun 2005;26(3):157-72. [Medline].
Choi B, Kim J, Welch AJ, et al. Dynamic impedance measurements during radio-frequency heating of cornea. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. Dec 2002;49(12 Pt 2):1610-6. [Medline].
Kornmehl EW. FDA approves help for aging eyes. Conductive keratoplasty may improve vision for people older than 40 who need reading glasses to see "the fine print". Health News. Jun 2004;10(6):8-9. [Medline].
Hersh PS. Optics of conductive keratoplasty: implications for presbyopia management. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2005;103:412-56. [Medline].
Alio JL, Claramonte PJ, Caliz A, et al. Corneal modeling of keratoconus by conductive keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. Jan 2005;31(1):190-7. [Medline].
Comaish IF, Lawless MA. Conductive keratoplasty to correct residual hyperopia after corneal surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. Jan 2003;29(1):202-6. [Medline].
Hersh PS, Fry KL, Chandrashekhar R, et al. Conductive keratoplasty to treat complications of LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. Nov 2005;112(11):1941-7. [Medline].
Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Zernike polynomial fitting fails to represent all visually significant corneal aberrations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Nov 2003;44(11):4676-81. [Medline].
Du TT, Fan VC, Asbell PA. Conductive keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. Jul 2007;18(4):334-7. [Medline].
McDonald MB. Conductive keratoplasty: a radiofrequency-based technique for the correction of hyperopia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2005;103:512-36. [Medline].
McDonald MB, Hersh PS, Manche EE, et al. Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia: U.S. clinical trial 1-year results on 355 eyes. Ophthalmology. Nov 2002;109(11):1978-89; discussion 1989-90. [Medline].
Haji SA, Ramonas K, Potapova N, et al. Intraoperative correction of induced astigmatism after spherical correction of hyperopia with conductive keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens. Mar 2005;31(2):76-9. [Medline].
McDonald MB, Davidorf J, Maloney RK, et al. Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia: 1-year results on the first 54 eyes. Ophthalmology. Apr 2002;109(4):637-49; discussion 649-50. [Medline].
Kymionis GD, Naoumidi TL, Aslanides IM, et al. Corneal iron ring after conductive keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. Aug 2003;136(2):378-9. [Medline].
Kymionis GD, Titze P, Markomanolakis MM, et al. Corneal perforation after conductive keratoplasty with previous refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. Dec 2003;29(12):2452-4. [Medline].
Ou JI, Manche EE. Corneal perforation after conductive keratoplasty in a patient with previously undiagnosed Sjögren syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. Aug 2007;125(8):1131-2. [Medline].
Kymionis GD, Naoumidi TL, Aslanides IM, et al. Intraocular pressure measurements after conductive keratoplasty. J Refract Surg. Mar-Apr 2005;21(2):171-5. [Medline].
Moshirfar M, Feilmeier M, Kumar R. Anterior chamber inflammation induced by conductive keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. Aug 2005;31(8):1676-7. [Medline].
McDonald M, Durrie D, Maloney R, et al. Breakfast with the Experts. ViewPoint Conductive Keratoplasty. American Academy of Ophthalmology;2001.
McDonald M. Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia: one-year results on the first 54 eyes. Ophthalmology. Sep 2002;109(9):1583. [Medline].
Nataloni R. Conductive keratoplasty offers hyperopes a non-laser option. One-year results suggest the radiofrequency technique provides postoperative stability for hyperopes. Ocular Surgery News Europe/Asia Pacific Edition. 2000;Available at: http://www.osnsupersite.com/. [Full Text].
Nataloni R. Conductive keratoplasty likened to LASIK in phase 3 study. Radio-frequency collagen shrinkage procedure offers predictability and spares the visual axis. Ocular Surgery News. February 2001;Available at: http://www.osnsupersite.com/. [Full Text].
Ocular Surgery News. ViewPoint CK System begins US phase 3 trial. 2001;Available at: http://www.osnsupersite.com/. [Full Text].
Ocular Surgery News. FDA panel says CK is approvable for temporary reduction of hyperopiaTwelve-month analysis of 171 eyes showed that the procedure easily beat the FDA guidelines by showing that 91% of patients were corrected to 20/40 or better. 2002;Available at: http://www.osnsupersite.com/. [Full Text].
Ocular Surgery News. FDA panel gives CK "approvable" recommendation. 2001;Available at: http://www.osnsupersite.com/. [Full Text].
Ocular Surgery News. Conductive keratoplasty using ViewPoint CK system is safe, highly effective, study says. Today's Top Story and Breaking News feature highlights from yesterday's American Academy of Ophthalmology presentations. 2001;Available at: http://www.osnsupersite.com/. [Full Text].
Ocular Surgery News. CK shows better efficacy than hyperopic LASIK, speakers say. 2001;Available at: http://www.osnsupersite.com/. [Full Text].
Haji SA, Brocks DC, Fahim MM, et al. Videokeratography in conductive keratoplasty. J Refract Surg. Jul-Aug 2004;20(4):329-36. [Medline].
Asbell PA, Maloney R, Davidorf J, et al. Stability of hyperopic correction with conductive keratoplasty (CK). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(4 Suppl):S900.
Pallikaris IG, Naoumidi TL, Astyrakakis NI. Conductive keratoplasty to correct hyperopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. Jul-Aug 2003;19(4):425-32. [Medline].
Sokol JA, Tammaro YR, Haji SA, et al. Conductive keratoplasty and the coupling phenomenon. Eye Contact Lens. May 2005;31(3):111-6. [Medline].
Ardjomand N, Wohlfart C, McAlister JC, et al. Conductive keratoplasty for asymmetric corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. May 2008;34(5):874-5. [Medline].
Anonymous. Conductive keratoplasty (CK) for presbyopia. Med Lett Drugs Ther. Jun 21 2004;46(1185):49-50. [Medline].
Claramonte PJ, Alio JL, Ramzy MI. Conductive keratoplasty to correct residual hyperopia after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. Sep 2006;32(9):1445-51. [Medline].
Lin DY, Manche EE. Two-year results of conductive keratoplasty for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. Dec 2003;29(12):2339-50. [Medline].
Pallikaris G, Naoumidi TL, Panagopoulou SI, et al. Conductive keratoplasty for low to moderate hyperopia: 1-year results. J Refract Surg. Sep-Oct 2003;19(5):496-506. [Medline].
Pallikaris IG, Naoumidi TL, Astyrakakis NI. Long-term results of conductive keratoplasty for low to moderate hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. Aug 2005;31(8):1520-9. [Medline].
Panescu D. Conductive keratoplasty. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. Jul-Aug 2004;23(4):16-8. [Medline].
Quinto GG, Camacho W, Behrens A. Postrefractive surgery dry eye. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. Jul 2008;19(4):335-41. [Medline].
Stahl JE. Conductive keratoplasty for presbyopia: 3-year results. J Refract Surg. Nov 2007;23(9):905-10. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
radiofrequency keratoplasty, CK, Refractec, farsightedness, laser surgical procedures, refractive surgery, corneal reshaping, laser in situ keratomileusis, LASIK, hyperopic LASIK, excimer laser ablation, photorefractive keratoplasty, PRK, radial keratotomy, RK, hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy, HPRK, laser thermal keratoplasty, LTK, hyperopic correction via LTK, ViewPoint conductive keratoplasty system, vision correction, NearVision CK, Light Touch, LightTouch
Overview: Hyperopia and Presbyopia, Conductive Keratoplasty