Epimacular Membrane Clinical Presentation
- Author: Kean Theng Oh, MD; Chief Editor: Hampton Roy Sr, MD more...
History
The type and degree of symptoms experienced by the patient depends largely on the thickness of the membrane, the degree of retinal distortion it causes, the location of the wrinkling, and the presence or the absence of retinal detachment or edema.[3]
- The usual symptoms caused by EMMs run the spectrum from no symptoms at all to severe visual dysfunction.
- Early on, EMMs cause little or no visual disturbance.
- As the membrane progresses, the visual disturbance is often vague and difficult for the patient to describe.
- Mild distortion or blurring is the most common symptom.
- Vision better than 20/50 is present in 78-85% of cases, while 56-67% have vision better than 20/30. Only 2-5% have vision poorer than 20/200.
- In more advanced cases, metamorphopsia, micropsia, or Amsler Grid abnormalities may be present.
- In contrast, vision is markedly reduced in patients with EMMs associated with retinal detachment. Vision is 20/60 or better in only 7% of cases and 56% have vision poorer than 20/200 after successful retinal reattachment surgery.
Physical
The clinical findings in EMMs vary according to the degree of severity of the membrane. Gass formulated a classification system based on the appearance of the membrane and the underlying retinal tissue and vessels.
- Grade 0 membranes
- Grade 0 EMMs are translucent membranes not associated with any retinal distortion.
- These EMMs also are known as cellophane maculopathy owing to the cellophanelike sheen coming from the inner retinal surface as it is seen ophthalmoscopically.
- Grade 1 membranes
- Membranes causing an irregular wrinkling of the inner retinal surface are classified as grade 1 EMMs.
- The crinkled cellophane appearance is caused by the gathering of the inner retinal layers into folds following the contraction of the overlying membrane.
- Fine, superficial, radiating folds extend outward from the margins of the contracted membrane.
- Wrinkling may be sufficient to produce tortuosity of the paramacular vessels pulling them toward the fovea.
- Cystoid macular edema, retinal hemorrhage, exudates, and RPE disturbances are typically absent.
- Grade 2 membranes
- Membranes, especially those that develop after retinal detachment surgery, have an opaque, thick appearance.
- Gross, full-thickness puckering of the macula may be present along with retinal edema, small hemorrhages, cotton-wool spots, and, infrequently, a localized detachment of the retina.
- These membranes are labeled macular puckers or grade 2 membranes.
Chang LK, Fine HF, Spaide RF, et al. Ultrastructural correlation of spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic findings in vitreomacular traction syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. Jul 2008;146(1):121-7. [Medline].
Bovey EH, Uffer S. Tearing and folding of the retinal internal limiting membrane associated with macular epiretinal membrane. Retina. Mar 2008;28(3):433-40. [Medline].
Karacorlu M, Ozdemir H, Senturk F, Karacorlu SA, Uysal O. Correlation of retinal sensitivity with visual acuity and macular thickness in eyes with idiopathic epimacular membrane. Int Ophthalmol. Jun 2010;30(3):285-90. [Medline].
Gupta P, Sadun AA, Sebag J. Multifocal retinal contraction in macular pucker analyzed by combined optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Retina. Mar 2008;28(3):447-52. [Medline].
Gupta OP, Ho AC, Kaiser PK, et al. Short-term outcomes of 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. Aug 2008;146(2):193-197. [Medline].
Gupta OP, Weichel ED, Regillo CD, et al. Postoperative complications associated with 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. Jul-Aug 2007;38(4):270-5. [Medline].
Charles S. Epimacular Membranes. In: Guyer DR, Yannuzzi LA, Chang S, et al. Retina-Vitreous-Macula. Vol 2. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1999:230-7.
Haritoglou C, Gandorfer A, Gass CA, et al. The effect of indocyanine-green on functional outcome of macular pucker surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. Mar 2003;135(3):328-37. [Medline].
Casparis H, Bovey EH. Surgical treatment of lamellar macular hole associated with epimacular membrane. Retina. Oct 2011;31(9):1783-90. [Medline].
Hillenkamp J, Saikia P, Herrmann WA, et al. Surgical removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane with or without the assistance of indocyanine green: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Jul 2007;245(7):973-9. [Medline].
Garweg JG, Bergstein D, Windisch B, et al. Recovery of visual field and acuity after removal of epiretinal and inner limiting membranes. Br J Ophthalmol. Feb 2008;92(2):220-4. [Medline].
Gass JDM. Macular dysfunction caused by epiretinal membrane contraction. In: Stereoscopic Atlas of Macular Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment. Vol 2. 4th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1997:938-950.
Haritoglou C, Gandorfer A, Schaumberger M, et al. Trypan blue in macular pucker surgery: an evaluation of histology and functional outcome. Retina. Aug 2004;24(4):582-90. [Medline].
Marghero RR. Epiretinal macular membranes. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, eds. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Vol 2. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1994:919-925.
McDonald HR, Schatz H, Johnson RN. Introduction to epiretinal membranes. In: Ryan SJ, ed. Retina. Vol 2. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1994:1819-1825.
Russell SR, Crapotta JA. Macular epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. June 1993;6(2):239-45.
Sjaarda RN, Michels RG. Macular pucker. In: Ryan SJ, ed. Retina. Vol 3. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1994:2301-2312.
Ting FS, Kwok AK. Treatment of epiretinal membrane: an update. Hong Kong Med J. Dec 2005;11(6):496-502. [Medline].
Wong JG, Sachdev N, Beaumont PE, et al. Visual outcomes following vitrectomy and peeling of epiretinal membrane. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. Aug 2005;33(4):373-8. [Medline].


