Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Exudative ARMD Treatment & Management

  • Author: F Ryan Prall, MD; Chief Editor: Hampton Roy, Sr, MD  more...
 
Updated: May 20, 2016
 

Medical Care

Antiangiogenic agents

VEGF inhibitors

Animal and clinical studies have established vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a key mediator in ocular angiogenesis.[5, 6] In clinical trials, particular attention has focused on the development of pharmaceutical agents to block or neutralize VEGF expression.

Pegaptanib sodium

Pegaptanib sodium (Macugen; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Melville, NY and Pfizer, Inc, New York, NY) is an anti-VEGF pegylated aptamer that demonstrated both safety and efficacy in clinical trials compared to placebo. This intravitreally administered polyethylene glycol (PEG)–conjugated oligonucleotide was specifically designed to bind and neutralize VEGF165, hypothesized to be the predominant VEGF isomer associated with CNV in humans.

The VEGF Inhibition Study in Ocular Neovascularization (VISION) Study was comprised of 2 phase II-III multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Enrollment of 1186 subjects was completed in July 2002. The 12-month data for all types of CNV showed that 70% of subjects receiving a 0.3-mg intravitreous injection every 6 weeks lost less than 3 lines of vision versus 55% of control subjects receiving sham injection (P < 0.001).[64] This was a similar efficacy to PDT, the standard treatment at that point.

The FDA accepted a new drug application (NDA) for wet AMD in August 2004, as did the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) in September 2004.[65] On December 17, 2004, the FDA approved the drug, which became available for consumer use in the United States in January 2005.[66]

Ranibizumab

Ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, and Novartis Ophthalmics, Basel, Switzerland), an intravitreally injected, recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody fragment designed to actively bind and inhibit all isoforms of VEGF, has become a common treatment for exudative AMD.

The Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-VEGF Antibody Ranibizumab (formerly, RhuFab) in the Treatment of Neovascular AMD (MARINA) was a phase III randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of ranibizumab against sham controls. Investigators enrolled 716 patients to receive 24 monthly intravitreal injections (0.3 mg or 0.5 mg) or sham injections. At 12-month follow-up, 95% of those treated with monthly ranibizumab injections had improved or stable vision versus 62% of control subjects receiving sham treatment (P < 0.001). More importantly, 34% of participants receiving the 0.5-mg dose experienced at least a 15-letter improvement that was maintained over 2 years (P < 0.001).[63] This was the first treatment for AMD that had demonstrated significant visual gains.

The Anti-VEGF Antibody for the Treatment of Predominantly Classic Choroidal Neovascularization in AMD (ANCHOR) trial was another prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind phase III trial designed to compare ranibizumab versus verteporfin in 423 subjects with predominantly classic exudative AMD. Similar to MARINA, 96% of subjects receiving 0.5 mg of ranibizumab had improved or stable vision versus 64% receiving verteporfin (P < 0.001). Visual acuity improved in 40% of subjects receiving the 0.5-mg dose versus 6% in the verteporfin group (P < 0.001).[67]

These trials altered the treatment paradigm of exudative AMD from a condition in which vision loss could only be slowed or stabilized to one in which visual acuity improvement was a real possibility. Clinicians are now attempting to maximize visual acuity while minimizing the number of retreatments to eyes with exudative AMD. The PIER trial gave 3 monthly injections of ranibizumab followed by quarterly injections over a 24-month interval. The 3-month results mirrored MARINA and ANCHOR; however, visual acuity gains declined once quarterly dosing began. The PIER data suggest that quarterly injections are less effective than monthly dosing.[68]

The HORIZON extension study, including patients from MARINA, ANCHOR, and FOCUS, documented adverse events and visual acuity results in patients treated with ranibizumab over 4 or more years. Rates of adverse events, including stroke and myocardial infarction continued to be low with long-term treatment. Some visual acuity gains achieved with monthly treatment during the initial phases of the studies were lost as patients were followed and treated less frequently during the latter years of the HORIZON study.[69]

The EXCITE trial measured the response to quarterly dosing and again confirmed that the regimen is less effective than monthly dosing.[70] In clinical practice, most ophthalmologists and retina specialists, use an induction phase, usually with 3 monthly injections, followed by an as-needed (prn) phase based on visual response, clinical examination, and imaging results. Several studies have attempted to compare this as-needed approach to the results found in MARINA and ANCHOR.

The Prospective OCT Imaging of Patients with Neovascular AMD Treated with Intra-Ocular Lucentis (PrONTO) Study was a small, uncontrolled open-label study, that treated patients with 3 monthly ranibizumab injections followed by monthly follow-up and redosing on an as-needed basis. The visual acuity improvements remained near the level of MARINA and ANCHOR, but the average number of retreatments dropped to 5.6 over 12 months.[71] Another as-needed dosing study, the SUSTAIN study, tested 3 monthly injections followed by an as-needed treatment regimen. During the as-needed phase, injections were given if there was a vision loss of 5 letters or an increase of 100 microns in central retinal thickness on OCT. The best improvement in vision occurred after the first 3 monthly injections, according to results, but dropped slightly when the as-needed regimen was initiated.[72]

Other clinicians are adopting the "treat and extend" approach, where patients are treated with 3 serial monthly ranibizumab injections followed by gradually extending the interval between subsequent injections until fluid reaccumulates. If a time pattern of recurrence develops, tailored treatments can be adopted.[73, 74] Two studies have demonstrated results similar to MARINA and ANCHOR with this approach.[75, 76]

The long-term safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections in neovascular AMD was examined in the SECURE study, a 24-month, open-label, multicenter trial involving 234 patients previously treated with ranibizumab for 12 months in the EXCITE/SUSTAIN study. Ranibizumab administered as per a visual acuity-guided flexible dosing regimen was well tolerated during the two-year study, and no new safety signals were identified in patients who were treated with ranibizumab for up to three years. On average, patients lost best-corrected visual acuity from baseline, probably because of either disease progression or undertreatment.[77]

Bevacizumab

Prior to the commercial availability of ranibizumab, bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA) was attempted as an off-label VEGF inhibitor to control exudative AMD. Bevacizumab is a full-length humanized monoclonal antibody against human VEGF, whereas ranibizumab is a fragmented humanized monoclonal antibody against human VEGF. The FDA approved bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer on February 26, 2004.[78]

Researchers initiated the Systemic Avastin for Neovascular ARMD (SANA) Study, an open-label uncontrolled pilot study of 9 subjects with subfoveal CNV, to evaluate the efficacy of systemic intravenous bevacizumab. Patients were infused with 5 mg/kg bevacizumab every 2 weeks for 2-3 treatments. Follow-up through 12 weeks revealed significant improvements in mean visual acuity (P = 0.008) and central retinal thickness (P = 0.001) over baseline with a marked reduction in leakage on FA.[79]

To allay concerns about systemic morbidity, an intravitreal injection route was detailed in a case report in 2005 that demonstrated marked reduction of subretinal fluid and stable visual acuity.[80] Numerous small studies have subsequently supported the use of intravitreal bevacizumab by demonstrating decreased retinal thickness and improved visual acuity over baseline.[81, 82, 83, 84, 85]

Because ranibizumab ($1950/dose) and bevacizumab ($50-75/dose) have an enormous price differential, and many retina physicians have felt they have comparable effectiveness, a good portion of patients are treated with bevacizumab. The National Eye Institute funded a large randomized controlled trial to directly compare the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab and ranibizumab in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment Trial (CATT). The study, whose findings were printed in The New England Journal of Medicine (May 19, 2011), showed that ranibizumab and bevacizumab have equivalent effects on visual acuity after one year.[86] These results were maintained after two years. Patients treated on an as-needed basis had slightly less visual acuity gain than those who continued on the monthly treatment regimen, but they received, on average, 10 fewer injections during the 2-year study period. No significant differences were noted in the number of significant adverse events associated with each drug.[87]

Intravitreal injections carry a small risk of endophthalmitis, with reported risk of 0.009-0.541%.[88, 89, 90, 91, 92] A meta-analysis of endophthalmitis cases following intravitreal injection revealed multiple cases secondary to Streptococcus species, in addition to the usual Staphylococcus species.[93] This led the authors to hypothesize that aerosolized oral flora may be responsible. Wen et al investigated the amount of bacterial dispersal associated with speech by having volunteers read over a blood agar plate with and without a face mask.[94] They found significant growth of Streptococcal bacterial colonies associated with uncovered speech and suggested wearing a face mask or minimizing speech during the procedure.

The FDA issued a safety alert regarding repackaged intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (Avastin), an anti-VEGF antibody. Serious eye infections caused by Streptococcus endophthalmitis have been reported in 12 patients who received the injections. The infections were the result of contamination that occurred during the repackaging of bevacizumab from 100 mg/4 mL single-use, preservative-free vials into individual 1-mL syringes for off-label use to treat wet macular degeneration.[95]

Aflibercept

Aflibercept (Eylea; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, NY) was approved in November 2011. It is a newer therapeutic agent that improves visual outcomes while requiring less frequent injections. Aflibercept is a fusion protein designed to bind to all forms of VEGF-A. Two phase 3 studies, VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD (VIEW 1 and 2) trials compared aflibercept to ranibizumab. VIEW 1 and 2 demonstrated safety and tolerability with visual results proving noninferior to the active control, ranibizumab.[96]

In VIEW 1 (n=1217), conducted in the United States, and VIEW 2 (n=1240), conducted in Europe, all regimens of the drug, including 2 mg dosed every 2 months (after 3 monthly loading doses), successfully met the primary endpoint of statistical noninferiority compared with ranibizumab, which is currently the most potent FDA-approved treatment option for wet AMD.

The proportions of patients who maintained or improved vision over the course of 52 weeks in VIEW 1 were 96%, 95%, and 95% of patients receiving aflibercept 0.5 mg monthly, 2 mg monthly, and 2 mg every 2 months, respectively. This compared with 94% of patients receiving the standard 0.5-mg monthly dose of ranibizumab.

For the secondary endpoint, visual acuity, the new drug was better. Patients receiving 2 mg monthly had a greater mean improvement in visual acuity at week 52, with a gain of 10.9 letters compared with 8.1 letters with ranibizumab (P < .01). All other dose groups were not significantly different from ranibizumab with respect to this secondary endpoint.[97]

Results from the CLEAR-IT 2 study, a phase 2 study of as-needed dosing with VEGF-trap, demonstrated that good visual results obtained after a fixed dosing regimen were maintained with a subsequent as-needed dosing schedule. After an initial 3 monthly injections, the 159 patients were treated on an as-needed basis for the remainder of the year. On average, patients needed 2 further injections to maintain the visual results.[98, 99]

Statins

Because of the association of serum lipid levels with AMD, using statins in an effort to prevent AMD has been considered. Some positive effects have been demonstrated in several studies, but overall, data are conflicting and sufficient evidence is lacking to support their use for AMD.[100, 101]

Laser treatments

Thermal laser photocoagulation

Until the advent of anti-VEGF agents, ophthalmologists traditionally used thermal laser destruction of CNV as the primary treatment of exudative AMD based on the results of the Macular Photocoagulation Study (MPS). This study, which was initiated in the 1980s and supported by the National Institutes of Health, demonstrated that laser photocoagulation of extrafoveal, juxtafoveal, and subfoveal CNV limited the risk of severe reductions in visual acuity compared with observation alone.

Patients were eligible for laser photocoagulation if they had classic CNV, as determined by FA. However, only 13-26% of all patients with exudative AMD presented with this inclusion pattern. Therefore, it was unclear whether laser photocoagulation was beneficial to a majority of patients with exudative AMD.[102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107] Moreover, at least one half of the enrolled subjects had persistent or recurrent CNV within 2 years of treatment.[103, 104]

Today, thermal laser photocoagulation is usually reserved for CNV outside the fovea and for treatment of the variants of exudative AMD, including retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.[32, 108] Although data from the subfoveal CNV arm of the MPS suggested that laser photocoagulation was better than observation, most clinicians do not treat subfoveal CNV with thermal photocoagulation because of the induction of an immediate, iatrogenic, central scotoma.[104, 105] Researchers have searched for alternative methods of treating subfoveal CNV with laser, including feeder-vessel photocoagulation[109] and transpupillary thermotherapy[110] ; however, these methods are not widely used clinically.

Photodynamic therapy

To avoid creating a central blinding scotoma when treating subfoveal CNV with thermal laser, clinicians turned to PDT. After intravenous infusion of a photosensitizing dye and a sufficient delay to concentrate it into pathologic choroidal neovascular tissue, the photosensitizer is stimulated with a specific wavelength of light that is directed at the CNV. The dye reacts with water to create oxygen and hydroxyl free radicals, which, in turn, induce occlusion of the pathologic vasculature by means of massive platelet activation and thrombosis while preserving the normal choroidal vasculature and nonvascular tissue.[111, 112, 113]

Verteporfin therapy

In April 2000, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PDT with verteporfin (Visudyne; QLT Therapeutics, Inc, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and Novartis Ophthalmics, Bulach, Switzerland) for use in patients with predominantly classic, subfoveal CNV caused by AMD. Marketing approval was granted in Europe in July 2000, and the drug is currently commercially available in more than 70 countries for the treatment of predominantly classic CNV.[114]

Verteporfin is a modified porphyrin with an absorption peak near 689 nm that is delivered intravenously for 10 minutes. After a 5-minute delay, the CNV complex is irradiated through the pupil with a large-spot diode laser at 689 nm for 83 seconds. The laser energy activates the intravascular photosensitizer and stimulates the photodynamic action within the pathologic CNV. Verteporfin is cleared rapidly from the body, resulting in minimal skin sensitivity by 5 days.

In 2001, the 2-year results of the Treatment of AMD with PDT (TAP) trial were published. The TAP trial consisted of 2 randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trials with 609 subjects. Second-year data showed that 59% of treated eyes lost less than 15 letters on a standardized eye chart compared to 31% in the control group when the lesion was predominantly classic.[37] The TAP trial was unmasked after 2 years of follow-up, and investigators continued with an open-label extension (to 36 mo) in 124 of the 159 original TAP participants with predominantly classic CNV. The data revealed that visual acuity remained nearly constant and the number of required repeat treatments decreased.[115]

Although standard PDT with verteporfin has shown promise in treating some forms of CNV, it is expensive, typically slows vision loss rather than improves it, and requires numerous repeat treatments. Therefore, other interventions to treat subfoveal CNV membranes were developed.

Combination therapies

Results from treatment with anti-VEGF agents have been promising, although there continues to be a subset of patients who have disappointing visual outcomes. In some cases, different forms of macular degeneration, such as polypoidal vasculopathy and retinal angiomatous proliferation, may respond dissimilarly to anti-VEGF agents. Other failures may be caused by the maturation of choroidal neovascular membranes that make them less susceptible to changes in VEGF levels.[7, 8, 9] Several clinical researchers have performed a variety of treatment combinations attempting to maximize visual acuity recovery while minimizing the number of retreatments in exudative AMD.[116, 117]

Because evidence can be found that PDT causes an increased expression of VEGF, there may be a theoretical advantage to searching PDT and anti-VEGF treatments.[118] In two studies, the efficacy of reduced-fluence PDT combined with bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone was tested. Both found that the number of injections needed in the combination groups was reduced by about half without significant differences in visual outcome.[119, 120] However, in another study using standard-fluence, visual acuity in the combination group was similar to monthly bevacizumab, but there was no drop in the number of bevacizumab injections required.[121]

Larger randomized clinical trials have addressed combination therapy. In the DENALI study, ranibizumab, as monotherapy or combined with verteporfin PDT, improved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 12, but did not demonstrate that combination regimens were noninferior to ranibizumab monotherapy.[122] In the MONT BLANC study, the combination of verteporfin PDT and ranibizumab was effective in achieving BCVA gain comparable with ranibizumab monotherapy, but combination therapy did not show benefits with respect to reducing the number of ranibizumab retreatment over 12 months.[123]

In a randomized, multicenter trial, Jackson et al found that a single dose of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) reduced the number of ranibizumab injections required for patients with neovascular AMD. The study evaluated 230 patients in whom neovascular AMD had developed within the previous 3 years; who had, within the preceding year, received at least 3 injections of ranibizumab or bevacizumab; and who required continuing treatment with either of these drugs.[124]

Randomized into 4 groups, the patients received ranibizumab (on as as-needed basis), as well as, depending on the group, a single dose of 16 Gy SRT, sham 16 Gy SRT, 24 Gy SRT, or sham 24 Gy SRT. The investigators found that patients in the 16 and 24 Gy SRT groups received significantly less ranibizumab (mean 2.64 and 2.43 injections, respectively) than did patients in the sham SRT groups (mean 3.74 injections) but with comparable retention of visual acuity over the course of 1 year.[124]

Next

Surgical Care

Vitreoretinal surgeons have attempted to remove CNVM with direct surgical excision of the CNV complex. In 1998, the National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health awarded funding to the Submacular Surgery Trial (SST). This study was a large randomized clinical trial comparing submacular CNVM removal versus observation. Patients were followed for 2 years and assessed for stabilization or deterioration of their visual acuity, a change in contrast sensitivity, cataract development, surgical complications, and quality of life. The trials did not demonstrate significant benefit of submacular surgery over observation.[125, 126]

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

F Ryan Prall, MD Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine

F Ryan Prall, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Society of Retina Specialists, Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Thomas A Ciulla, MD, MBA Staff Physician and Surgeon, Indiana University Health System, Beltway Surgery Centers, LLC, and St Vincent Hospital; Staff Physician and Retina Specialist, Midwest Eye Institute

Thomas A Ciulla, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Diabetes Association, Indiana Academy of Ophthalmology, Indianapolis Ophthalmological Society, Macula Society, Retina Society, Society of Heed Fellows

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mark H Criswell, PhD Adjunct Assistant Research Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine

Mark H Criswell, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Alon Harris, PhD Lois Letzter Professor, Director of Glaucoma Research and Diagnostic Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine

Alon Harris, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Sports Medicine, American Physiological Society, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, New York Academy of Sciences

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Steve Charles, MD Director of Charles Retina Institute; Clinical Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine

Steve Charles, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Society of Retina Specialists, Macula Society, Retina Society, Club Jules Gonin

Disclosure: Received royalty and consulting fees for: Alcon Laboratories.

Chief Editor

Hampton Roy, Sr, MD Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Hampton Roy, Sr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American College of Surgeons, Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Brian A Phillpotts, MD, MD 

Brian A Phillpotts, MD, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Diabetes Association, American Medical Association, National Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author, Grant M Comer, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Tielsch JM, Javitt JC, Coleman A, Katz J, Sommer A. The prevalence of blindness and visual impairment among nursing home residents in Baltimore. N Engl J Med. 1995 May 4. 332(18):1205-9. [Medline].

  2. Friedman DS, O'Colmain BJ, Munoz B, Tomany SC, McCarty C, de Jong PT, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr. 122(4):564-72. [Medline].

  3. Hand L. Blood Pressure Meds May Up AMD Risk, 20-Year Study Suggests. Medscape Medical News. June 4 2014. [Full Text].

  4. Klein R, Myers CE, Klein BE. Vasodilators, blood pressure-lowering medications, and age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2014 Apr 11. [Medline].

  5. Tolentino MJ, Brucker AJ, Fosnot J, Ying GS, Wu IH, Malik G, et al. Intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor small interfering RNA inhibits growth and leakage in a nonhuman primate, laser-induced model of choroidal neovascularization. Retina. 2004 Feb. 24(1):132-8. [Medline].

  6. Tolentino MJ, Husain D, Theodosiadis P, Gragoudas ES, Connolly E, Kahn J, et al. Angiography of fluoresceinated anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody and dextrans in experimental choroidal neovascularization. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan. 118(1):78-84. [Medline].

  7. Bergers G, Song S, Meyer-Morse N, Bergsland E, Hanahan D. Benefits of targeting both pericytes and endothelial cells in the tumor vasculature with kinase inhibitors. J Clin Invest. 2003 May. 111(9):1287-95. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Bradley J, Ju M, Robinson GS. Combination therapy for the treatment of ocular neovascularization. Angiogenesis. 2007. 10(2):141-8. [Medline].

  9. Jo N, Mailhos C, Ju M, Cheung E, Bradley J, Nishijima K, et al. Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor B signaling enhances the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in multiple models of ocular neovascularization. Am J Pathol. 2006 Jun. 168(6):2036-53. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  10. Kahn HA, Leibowitz HM, Ganley JP, Kini MM, Colton T, Nickerson RS, et al. The Framingham Eye Study. I. Outline and major prevalence findings. Am J Epidemiol. 1977 Jul. 106(1):17-32. [Medline].

  11. Attebo K, Mitchell P, Smith W. Visual acuity and the causes of visual loss in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1996 Mar. 103(3):357-64. [Medline].

  12. Klaver CC, Wolfs RC, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 May. 116(5):653-8. [Medline].

  13. Klein R, Davis MD, Magli YL, Segal P, Klein BE, Hubbard L. The Wisconsin age-related maculopathy grading system. Ophthalmology. 1991 Jul. 98(7):1128-34. [Medline].

  14. Davis MD, Gangnon RE, Lee LY, Hubbard LD, Klein BE, Klein R, et al. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 17. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov. 123(11):1484-98. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  15. Klein ML, Francis PJ, Ferris FL 3rd, Hamon SC, Clemons TE. Risk assessment model for development of advanced age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec. 129(12):1543-50. [Medline].

  16. Bird AC, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Chisholm IH, Coscas G, Davis MD, et al. An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. The International ARM Epidemiological Study Group. Surv Ophthalmol. 1995 Mar-Apr. 39(5):367-74. [Medline].

  17. Davis MD, Gangnon RE, Lee LY, Hubbard LD, Klein BE, Klein R, et al. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 17. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov. 123(11):1484-98. [Medline].

  18. Klein R, Peto T, Bird A, Vannewkirk MR. The epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar. 137(3):486-95. [Medline].

  19. Mares-Perlman JA, Brady WE, Klein R, VandenLangenberg GM, Klein BE, Palta M. Dietary fat and age-related maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Jun. 113(6):743-8. [Medline].

  20. Chong EW, Kreis AJ, Wong TY, Simpson JA, Guymer RH. Dietary omega-3 fatty acid and fish intake in the primary prevention of age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Jun. 126(6):826-33. [Medline].

  21. Seddon JM, Rosner B, Sperduto RD, Yannuzzi L, Haller JA, Blair NP, et al. Dietary fat and risk for advanced age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Aug. 119(8):1191-9. [Medline].

  22. Chong EW, Robman LD, Simpson JA, Hodge AM, Aung KZ, Dolphin TK, et al. Fat consumption and its association with age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 May. 127(5):674-80. [Medline].

  23. Chua B, Flood V, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ, Smith W, Mitchell P. Dietary fatty acids and the 5-year incidence of age-related maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul. 124(7):981-6. [Medline].

  24. Seddon JM, Cote J, Davis N, Rosner B. Progression of age-related macular degeneration: association with body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun. 121(6):785-92. [Medline].

  25. Okubo A, Rosa RH, Fan JT, et al. RPE residual body content, autofluorescence and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996. 37(suppl):380.

  26. von Ruckmann A, Fitzke FW, Bird AC. In vivo fundus autofluorescence in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997. 38:478-86.

  27. Edwards AO, Ritter R 3rd, Abel KJ, Manning A, Panhuysen C, Farrer LA. Complement factor H polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005 Apr 15. 308(5720):421-4. [Medline].

  28. Haines JL, Hauser MA, Schmidt S, Scott WK, Olson LM, Gallins P, et al. Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005 Apr 15. 308(5720):419-21. [Medline].

  29. Hageman GS, Anderson DH, Johnson LV. A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005. 102:7227-32.

  30. Jakobsdottir J, Conley YP, Weeks DE, Mah TS, Ferrell RE, Gorin MB. Susceptibility genes for age-related maculopathy on chromosome 10q26. Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Sep. 77(3):389-407. [Medline].

  31. Gold B, Merriam JE, Zernant J. Variation in factor B (BF) and complement component 2 (C2)genes is associated with age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet. 2006. 38:458-62.

  32. Johnson LV, Leitner WP, Staples MK, Anderson DH. Complement activation and inflammatory processes in Drusen formation and age related macular degeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2001 Dec. 73(6):887-96. [Medline].

  33. Esparza-Gordillo J, Soria JM, Buil A, Almasy L, Blangero J, Fontcuberta J. Genetic and environmental factors influencing the human factor H plasma levels. Immunogenetics. 2004 May. 56(2):77-82. [Medline].

  34. Sepp T, Khan JC, Thurlby DA, Shahid H, Clayton DG, Moore AT, et al. Complement factor H variant Y402H is a major risk determinant for geographic atrophy and choroidal neovascularization in smokers and nonsmokers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Feb. 47(2):536-40. [Medline].

  35. Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Congdon NG, Ferris FL 3rd, Friedman DS, et al. Potential public health impact of Age-Related Eye Disease Study results: AREDS report no. 11. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov. 121(11):1621-4. [Medline].

  36. Thylefors B. A global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jan. 125(1):90-3. [Medline].

  37. Brody BL, Gamst AC, Williams RA, et al. Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2001 Oct. 108(10):1893-900; discussion 1900-1. [Medline].

  38. Casten RJ, Rovner BW, Tasman W. Age-related macular degeneration and depression: a review of recent research. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004 Jun. 15(3):181-3. [Medline].

  39. Coleman AL, Stone K, Ewing SK, Nevitt M, Cummings S, Cauley JA, et al. Higher risk of multiple falls among elderly women who lose visual acuity. Ophthalmology. 2004 May. 111(5):857-62. [Medline].

  40. Dong LM, Childs AL, Mangione CM, Bass EB, Bressler NM, Hawkins BS, et al. Health- and vision-related quality of life among patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration at enrollment in randomized trials of submacular surgery: SST report no. 4. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul. 138(1):91-108. [Medline].

  41. Vision and quality-of-life. Brown GC. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999. 97:473-511.

  42. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt JC, et al. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N Engl J Med. 1991 Nov 14. 325(20):1412-7. [Medline].

  43. Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE. Sunlight and age-related macular degeneration. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Apr. 111(4):514-8. [Medline].

  44. Das BN, Thompson JR, Patel R, Rosenthal AR. The prevalence of eye disease in Leicester: a comparison of adults of Asian and European descent. J R Soc Med. 1994 Apr. 87(4):219-22. [Medline].

  45. Miyazaki M, Nakamura H, Kubo M, Kiyohara Y, Oshima Y, Ishibashi T, et al. Risk factors for age related maculopathy in a Japanese population: the Hisayama study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Apr. 87(4):469-72. [Medline].

  46. Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992 Jun. 99(6):933-43. [Medline].

  47. Klein R, Rowland ML, Harris MI. Racial/ethnic differences in age-related maculopathy. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Ophthalmology. 1995 Mar. 102(3):371-81. [Medline].

  48. Kini MM, Leibowitz HM, Colton T, Nickerson RJ, Ganley J, Dawber TR. Prevalence of senile cataract, diabetic retinopathy, senile macular degeneration, and open-angle glaucoma in the Framingham eye study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978 Jan. 85(1):28-34. [Medline].

  49. Leibowitz HM, Krueger DE, Maunder LR, Milton RC, Kini MM, Kahn HA, et al. The Framingham Eye Study monograph: An ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults, 1973-1975. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980 May-Jun. 24:335-610. [Medline].

  50. Klein R, Klein BE, Jensen SC, Meuer SM. The five-year incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1997 Jan. 104(1):7-21. [Medline].

  51. Seddon JM, Cote J, Davis N, Rosner B. Progression of age-related macular degeneration: association with body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun. 121(6):785-92. [Medline].

  52. Seddon JM, Ajani UA, Mitchell BD. Familial aggregation of age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Feb. 123(2):199-206. [Medline].

  53. Seddon JM, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Hankinson SE. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and age-related macular degeneration in women. JAMA. 1996 Oct 9. 276(14):1141-6. [Medline].

  54. Christen WG, Glynn RJ, Manson JE, Ajani UA, Buring JE. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of age-related macular degeneration in men. JAMA. 1996 Oct 9. 276(14):1147-51. [Medline].

  55. Christen WG, Schaumberg DA, Glynn RJ, Buring JE. Dietary {omega}-3 Fatty Acid and Fish Intake and Incident Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Women. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul. 129(7):921-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  56. Seddon JM, George S, Rosner B. Cigarette smoking, fish consumption, omega-3 fatty acid intake, and associations with age-related macular degeneration: the US Twin Study of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul. 124(7):995-1001. [Medline].

  57. Yannuzzi LA. Indocyanine green angiography: a perspective on use in the clinical setting. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 May. 151(5):745-751.e1. [Medline].

  58. Hee MR, Baumal CR, Puliafito CA, Duker JS, Reichel E, Wilkins JR, et al. Optical coherence tomography of age-related macular degeneration and choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmology. 1996 Aug. 103(8):1260-70. [Medline].

  59. Ting TD, Oh M, Cox TA, Meyer CH, Toth CA. Decreased visual acuity associated with cystoid macular edema in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun. 120(6):731-7. [Medline].

  60. Sahni J, Stanga P, Wong D, Harding S. Optical coherence tomography in photodynamic therapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation secondary to age related macular degeneration: a cross sectional study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar. 89(3):316-20. [Medline].

  61. Piccolino FC, de la Longrais RR, Ravera G, Eandi CM, Ventre L, Abdollahi A, et al. The foveal photoreceptor layer and visual acuity loss in central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan. 139(1):87-99. [Medline].

  62. Rogers AH, Martidis A, Greenberg PB, Puliafito CA. Optical coherence tomography findings following photodynamic therapy of choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct. 134(4):566-76. [Medline].

  63. Rosenfeld P, Rich RM, Lalwani GA. Ranibizumab: Phase II clinical trial results. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America. 2006. 19:361-72.

  64. Gragoudas ES, Adamis AP, Cunningham ET Jr, Feinsod M, Guyer DR. Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 30. 351(27):2805-16. [Medline].

  65. Eyetech Pharmaceuticals. Eyetech announces launch date for Macugen (pegaptanib sodium injection) [Eyetech Web site]. January 20, 2005. Available at: http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/13/134799/newspdfs/1-20-05.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2005. [Full Text].

  66. Eyetech Pharmaceuticals. Pfizer and Eyetech provide regulatory update on Macugen (pegaptanib sodium injection) [Eyetech Web site]. September 20, 2004. Available at: http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/13/134799/newspdfs/9-20-04-Update.pdf. Accessed October 12, 2004. [Full Text].

  67. Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, Soubrane G, Heier JS, Kim RY. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 5. 355(14):1432-44. [Medline].

  68. Genetech Press Release. Preliminary Results from a Phase IIIb Study Showed Patients with Wet AMD Treated with Lucentis Quarterly Experienced a 16-Letter Benefit over the Control Group at One Year. Available at http://www.gene.com/gene/news/press-releases/display.do?method=detail&id=9747. Accessed: 2/21/2008.

  69. Singer MA, Awh CC, Sadda S, Freeman WR, Antoszyk AN, Wong P, et al. HORIZON: An Open-Label Extension Trial of Ranibizumab for Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012 Feb 4. [Medline].

  70. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Eldem B, Guymer R, Korobelnik JF, Schlingemann RO, Axer-Siegel R, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Monthly versus Quarterly Ranibizumab Treatment in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: The EXCITE Study. Ophthalmology. 2011 May. 118(5):831-9. [Medline].

  71. Fung AE, Lalwani GA, Rosenfeld PJ, Dubovy SR, Michels S, Feuer WJ. An optical coherence tomography-guided, variable dosing regimen with intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr. 143(4):566-83. [Medline].

  72. Holz FG, Korobelnik JF, Lanzetta P, Mitchell P, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Wolf S, et al. The effects of a flexible visual acuity-driven ranibizumab treatment regimen in age-related macular degeneration: outcomes of a drug and disease model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jan. 51(1):405-12. [Medline].

  73. Spaide R. Ranibizumab according to need: a treatment for age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr. 143(4):679-80. [Medline].

  74. Brown DM, Regillo CD. Anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: applying clinical trial results to the treatment of everyday patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct. 144(4):627-37. [Medline].

  75. Gupta OP, Shienbaum G, Patel AH, et al. A treat and extend regimen using ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration clinical and economic impact. Ophthalmology. 2010. 117:2134-2140.

  76. Shienbaum G, Gupta OP, Fecarotta C, et al. Management of neovascular age- related macular degeneration using bevacizumab with the treat and extend regimen: clinical results and economic impact. In: ARVO; Fort Lauderdale, Florida; 2010.

  77. Silva R, Axer-Siegel R, Eldem B, Guymer R, Kirchhof B, Papp A, et al. The SECURE Study: Long-Term Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012 Sep 25. [Medline].

  78. Genentech. Avastin [Genentech Web site]. Available at: http://www.gene.com/gene/products/information/oncology/avastin/index.jsp. Accessed June 28, 2005. [Full Text].

  79. Michels S, Rosenfeld PJ, Puliafito CA, et al. Systemic bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration twelve-week results of an uncontrolled open-label clinical study. Ophthalmology. 2005 Jun. 112(6):1035-47. [Medline].

  80. Rosenfeld PJ, Moshfeghi AA, Puliafito CA. Optical coherence tomography findings after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005 Jul-Aug. 36(4):331-5. [Medline].

  81. Yoganathan P, Deramo VA, Lai JC, Tibrewala RK, Fastenberg DM. Visual improvement following intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2006 Nov-Dec. 26(9):994-8. [Medline].

  82. Emerson MV, Lauer AK, Flaxel CJ, Wilson DJ, Francis PJ, Stout JT. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2007 Apr-May. 27(4):439-44. [Medline].

  83. Abraham-Marin ML, Cortes-Luna CF, Alvarez-Rivera G, Hernandez-Rojas M, Quiroz-Mercado H, Morales-Canton V. Intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 May. 245(5):651-5. [Medline].

  84. Bashshur ZF, Schakal A, Hamam RN, El Haibi CP, Jaafar RF, Noureddin BN. Intravitreal bevacizumab vs verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct. 125(10):1357-61. [Medline].

  85. Lazic R, Gabric N. Verteporfin therapy and intravitreal bevacizumab combined and alone in choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2007 Jun. 114(6):1179-85. [Medline].

  86. Martin DF, Maguire MG, Ying GS, Grunwald JE, Fine SL, Jaffe GJ. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 19. 364(20):1897-908. [Medline].

  87. Martin DF, Maguire MG, Fine SL, Ying GS, Jaffe GJ, Grunwald JE, et al. Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Two-Year Results. Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr 26. [Medline].

  88. Cavalcante LL, Cavalcante ML, Murray TG, et al. Intravitreal injection analysis at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute: evaluation of clinical indications for the treatment and incidence rates of endophthalmitis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 May 25. 4:519-24. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  89. Mason JO 3rd, White MF, Feist RM, et al. Incidence of acute onset endophthalmitis following intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) injection. Retina. 2008 Apr. 28(4):564-7. [Medline].

  90. Fintak DR, Shah GK, Blinder KJ, et al. Incidence of endophthalmitis related to intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Retina. 2008 Nov-Dec. 28(10):1395-9. [Medline].

  91. Pilli S, Kotsolis A, Spaide RF, et al. Endophthalmitis associated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy injections in an office setting. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 May. 145(5):879-82. [Medline].

  92. Diago T, McCannel CA, Bakri SJ, et al. Infectious endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic agents. Retina. 2009 May. 29(5):601-5. [Medline].

  93. McCannel CA. Meta-analysis of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents: causative organisms and possible prevention strategies. Retina. 2011 Apr. 31(4):654-61. [Medline].

  94. Wen JC, McCannel CA, Mochon AB, Garner OB. Bacterial dispersal associated with speech in the setting of intravitreous injections. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec. 129(12):1551-4. [Medline].

  95. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA alerts health care professionals of infection risk from repackaged Avastin intravitreal injections. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm270296.htm. Accessed: August 31, 2011.

  96. Dixon JA, Oliver SC, Olson JL, Mandava N. VEGF Trap-Eye for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009 Oct. 18(10):1573-80. [Medline].

  97. Regeneron announces FDA approval of Eylea™ (aflibercept) injection for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration; 18 November 2011. Available at http://www.multivu.com/mnr/51268-eylea-aflibercept-wet-age-related-macular-degeneration-AMD-FDA-approval. Accessed: 22 November 2011.

  98. Brown DM, Heier JS, Ciulla T, Benz M, Abraham P, Yancopoulos G, et al. Primary Endpoint Results of a Phase II Study of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap-Eye in Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun. 118(6):1089-97. [Medline].

  99. Heier JS, Boyer D, Nguyen QD, Marcus D, Roth DB, Yancopoulos G, et al. The 1-year Results of CLEAR-IT 2, a Phase 2 Study of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap-Eye Dosed As-needed After 12-week Fixed Dosing. Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun. 118(6):1098-106. [Medline].

  100. Gehlbach P, Li T, Hatef E. Statins for age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8. CD006927. [Medline].

  101. Chuo JY, Wiens M, Etminan M, Maberley DA. Use of lipid-lowering agents for the prevention of age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007 Nov-Dec. 14(6):367-74. [Medline].

  102. MPS Group. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Argon laser photocoagulation for senile macular degeneration. Results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Jun. 100(6):912-8. [Medline].

  103. MPS Group. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Argon laser photocoagulation for neovascular maculopathy. Three-year results from randomized clinical trials. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 May. 104(5):694-701. [Medline].

  104. MPS Group. Argon laser photocoagulation for neovascular maculopathy. Five-year results from randomized clinical trials. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Aug. 109(8):1109-14. [Medline].

  105. MPS Group. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Five-year follow-up of fellow eyes of patients with age-related macular degeneration and unilateral extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Sep. 111(9):1189-99. [Medline].

  106. Freund KB, Yannuzzi LA, Sorenson JA. Age-related macular degeneration and choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jun 15. 115(6):786-91. [Medline].

  107. Moisseiev J, Alhalel A, Masuri R, Treister G. The impact of the macular photocoagulation study results on the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Feb. 113(2):185-9. [Medline].

  108. Nishijima K, Takahashi M, Akita J, Katsuta H, Tanemura M, Aikawa H, et al. Laser photocoagulation of indocyanine green angiographically identified feeder vessels to idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr. 137(4):770-3. [Medline].

  109. Shiraga F, Ojima Y, Matsuo T, Takasu I, Matsuo N. Feeder vessel photocoagulation of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1998 Apr. 105(4):662-9. [Medline].

  110. Reichel E, Musch DC, Blodi BA. Results from the TTT4CNV clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005. 46:E-abstract 2311.

  111. Aveline B, Hasan T, Redmond RW. Photophysical and photosensitizing properties of benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD-MA). Photochem Photobiol. 1994 Mar. 59(3):328-35. [Medline].

  112. Allison BA, Waterfield E, Richter AM, Levy JG. The effects of plasma lipoproteins on in vitro tumor cell killing and in vivo tumor photosensitization with benzoporphyrin derivative. Photochem Photobiol. 1991 Nov. 54(5):709-15. [Medline].

  113. Hunt DW, Jiang H, Granville DJ, Chan AH, Leong S, Levy JG. Consequences of the photodynamic treatment of resting and activated peripheral T lymphocytes. Immunopharmacology. 1999 Jan. 41(1):31-44. [Medline].

  114. Novartis Ophthalmics. Visudyne launched in Japan for treatment of age-related macular degeneration [Novartis Web site]. May 10, 2004. Available at: http://www.us.novartisophthalmics.com/hcp/press-release/Visodyne_E_10.05.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2004. [Full Text].

  115. Blumenkranz MS, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Donati G, Fish GE, Haynes LA, et al. Verteporfin therapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: three-year results of an open-label extension of 2 randomized clinical trials--TAP Report no. 5. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct. 120(10):1307-14. [Medline].

  116. Dhalla MS, Shah GK, Blinder KJ, Ryan EH Jr, Mittra RA, Tewari A. Combined photodynamic therapy with verteporfin and intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2006 Nov-Dec. 26(9):988-93. [Medline].

  117. Augustin AJ, Puls S, Offermann I. Triple therapy for choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration: verteporfin PDT, bevacizumab, and dexamethasone. Retina. 2007 Feb. 27(2):133-40. [Medline].

  118. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Schlötzer-Schrehard U, Cursiefen C, Michels S, Beckendorf A, Naumann GO. Influence of photodynamic therapy on expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor 3, and pigment epithelium-derived factor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Oct. 44(10):4473-80. [Medline].

  119. Costagliola C, Romano MR, Rinaldi M, dell'Omo R, Chiosi F, Menzione M, et al. Low fluence rate photodynamic therapy combined with intravitreal bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb. 94(2):180-4. [Medline].

  120. Potter MJ, Claudio CC, Szabo SM. A randomised trial of bevacizumab and reduced light dose photodynamic therapy in age-related macular degeneration: the VIA study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb. 94(2):174-9. [Medline].

  121. Lim JY, Lee SY, Kim JG, Lee JY, Chung H, Yoon YH. Intravitreal bevacizumab alone versus in combination with photodynamic therapy for the treatment of neovascular maculopathy in patients aged 50 years or older: 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar 16. [Medline].

  122. Kaiser PK, Boyer DS, Cruess AF, Slakter JS, Pilz S, Weisberger A. Verteporfin plus ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: twelve-month results of the DENALI study. Ophthalmology. 2012 May. 119(5):1001-10. [Medline].

  123. Larsen M, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lanzetta P, Wolf S, Simader C, Tokaji E, et al. Verteporfin plus ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: twelve-month MONT BLANC study results. Ophthalmology. 2012 May. 119(5):992-1000. [Medline].

  124. Jackson TL, Chakravarthy U, Kaiser PK, Slakter JS, Jan E, Bandello F, et al. Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: 52-Week Safety and Efficacy Results of the INTREPID Study. Ophthalmology. 2013 Mar 12. [Medline].

  125. Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Childs AL, Haller JA, Hawkins BS, Lewis H, et al. Surgery for hemorrhagic choroidal neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration: ophthalmic findings: SST report no. 13. Ophthalmology. 2004 Nov. 111(11):1993-2006. [Medline].

  126. Hawkins BS, Bressler NM, Miskala PH, Bressler SB, Holekamp NM, Marsh MJ, et al. Surgery for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: ophthalmic findings: SST report no. 11. Ophthalmology. 2004 Nov. 111(11):1967-80. [Medline].

  127. Abraham P, Yue H, Wilson L. Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER study year 2. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep. 150(3):315-324.e1. [Medline].

  128. Bressler NM. Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: two-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials-tap report 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Feb. 119(2):198-207. [Medline].

  129. Cho H, Shah CP, Weber M, Heier JS. Aflibercept for exudative AMD with persistent fluid on ranibizumab and/or bevacizumab. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug. 97(8):1032-5. [Medline].

  130. Drexler W, Sattmann H, Hermann B, Ko TH, Stur M, Unterhuber A, et al. Enhanced visualization of macular pathology with the use of ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 May. 121(5):695-706. [Medline].

  131. Hageman GS, Luthert PJ, Victor Chong NH, Johnson LV, Anderson DH, et al. An integrated hypothesis that considers drusen as biomarkers of immune-mediated processes at the RPE-Bruch's membrane interface in aging and age-related macular degeneration. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. November 2001. 20:705-32.

  132. Harrison P. Aflibercept Switch Helps Macular Degeneration. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/810212. Accessed: September 1, 2013.

  133. Johnson TM, Glaser BM. Focal laser ablation of retinal angiomatous proliferation. Retina. 2006 Sep. 26(7):765-72. [Medline].

  134. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, Tsai JY, Sackler RS, Haynes C, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005 Apr 15. 308(5720):385-9. [Medline].

  135. Matsuyama K, Ogata N, Matsuoka M, Wada M, Takahashi K, Nishimura T. Plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and pigment epithelium-derived factor before and after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep. 94(9):1215-8. [Medline].

  136. MPS Group. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Laser photocoagulation of subfoveal neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration. Updated findings from two clinical trials. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Sep. 111(9):1200-9. [Medline].

  137. MPS Group. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Recurrent choroidal neovascularization after argon laser photocoagulation for neovascular maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Apr. 104(4):503-12. [Medline].

  138. MPS Group. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Subfoveal neovascular lesions in age-related macular degeneration. Guidelines for evaluation and treatment in the macular photocoagulation study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Sep. 109(9):1242-57. [Medline].

  139. National Eye Institute. Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment Trial (CATT). ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00593450. Accessed: 2/21/2008.

  140. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, Boyer DS, Kaiser PK, Chung CY, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 5. 355(14):1419-31. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), exudative.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), exudative.
Color photograph of the fundus shows nonexudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with geographic atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and drusen. Absolute atrophy of the RPE occupies the foveal region in this case of nonexudative AMD. The central atrophic region causes a corresponding central scotoma. Note the large choroidal vessels, which are visible through the RPE defect. Drusen surround the region of geographic atrophy. Photo by Tim Steffens.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.