Introduction
Background
Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) are rather variable in presentation, outcome, and prognosis. With increased awareness and advanced surgical techniques, the outcome and the prognosis for these potentially devastating injuries have substantially improved.
The most important limiting factor today is the damage occurring at the time of the initial injury. One effective method appears to be prophylactic chorioretinectomy (see Surgical Care), which reduces the risk of postinjury proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).
Pathophysiology
The final resting place of and damage caused by an IOFB depend on several factors, including the size, the shape, and the momentum of the object at the time of impact, as well as the site of ocular penetration.
IOFBs transversing the lens are less likely to cause major retinal damage; conversely, a smaller wound size usually means deeper penetration.
In addition to the initial damage caused at the time of impact, the risk of endophthalmitis and subsequent scarring (eg, PVR) play an important role in the planning of the surgical intervention.
Frequency
United States
According to the United States Eye Injury Registry (USEIR), the surveillance arm of the American Society of Ocular Trauma (ASOT), the frequency in the United States is 16%. The most common cause is hammering; the incidence over time shows a decrease at the workplace and an increase in the home.
International
The frequency greatly varies (up to 41%) worldwide, depending upon the population surveyed.
Mortality/Morbidity
Most IOFBs cause internal damage, and most will come to rest in the posterior segment. Commonly injured structures include the cornea, the lens, and the retina.
Race
No racial predilection has been found so far.
Sex
According to the USEIR, 93% of patients with IOFBs are male.
Age
According to the USEIR, the average patient is aged 31 years.
Clinical
History
A few direct questions should be sufficient for the ophthalmologist to suspect the presence of an IOFB in eyes with an open globe injury.
In case of doubt, it is advisable to err on the side of an IOFB presence. The most common cause for litigation against the ophthalmologist in a trauma case is a missed IOFB. It is important to remember that the patient may be unaware of any object entering (or even striking) the eye, and the vision may be unaffected initially.
Physical
A complete examination of both eyes is necessary, including the visual acuity.
- A corneal entry wound and a hole in the iris provide trajectory information.
- The slit lamp is extremely useful in detailing all anterior segment pathologies.
- The indirect ophthalmoscope through a dilated pupil may allow direct visualization of the IOFB, which gives the most useful information for the surgeon.
- Gonioscopy and scleral depression are not recommended unless the entry wound has been surgically closed.
Causes
Hammering and using power tools are the most important causes. Protective eyewear, if appropriate (3 mm of polycarbonate), prevents virtually all injuries.
More on Foreign Body, Intraocular |
Overview: Foreign Body, Intraocular |
| Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Foreign Body, Intraocular |
| Treatment & Medication: Foreign Body, Intraocular |
| Follow-up: Foreign Body, Intraocular |
| Multimedia: Foreign Body, Intraocular |
| References |
| Next Page » |
References
Azad RV, Kumar N, Sharma YR, et al. Role of prophylactic scleral buckling in the management of retained intraocular foreign bodies. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. Feb 2004;32(1):58-61. [Medline].
Barry DR. Effects of retained intraocular foreign bodies. Int Ophthalmol Clin. Spring 1968;8(1):153-70. [Medline].
Behrens-Braumann W, Praetorius G. Intraocular foreign bodies: 297 consecutive cases. Ophthalmologica. 1989;198(2):84-8.
Boldt HC, Pulido JS, Blodi CF, et al. Rural endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. Dec 1989;96(12):1722-6. [Medline].
Brown IA. Intraocular foreign bodies. Nature of injury. Int Ophthalmol Clin. Spring 1968;8(1):147-52. [Medline].
Coleman DJ, Jack RL, Franzen LA. Ultrasonography in ocular trauma. Am J Ophthalmol. Feb 1973;75(2):279-88. [Medline].
Coleman DJ, Lucas BC, Rondeau MJ, et al. Management of intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. Dec 1987;94(12):1647-53. [Medline].
Cooke CA, Mulholland DA. A closer look at anterior segment intraocular foreign bodies. Eye. Apr 2005;19(4):476-8. [Medline].
Cridland N. Magnetic extraction. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1986;8(1):213-29.
Demircan N, Soylu M, Yagmur M, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy in ocular injury with intraocular foreign body. J Trauma. Nov 2005;59(5):1216-8. [Medline].
Duker JS, Fischer DH. Occult plastic intraocular foreign body. Ophthalmic Surg. Mar 1989;20(3):169-70. [Medline].
Erakgun T, Akkin C, Mentes J. Management of the posterior segment foreign bodies with a simple snare. Retina. Dec 2003;23(6):858-60. [Medline].
Johnston S. Perforating eye injuries: a five year survey. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1971;91:895-921. [Medline].
Knox FA, Best RM, Kinsella F, et al. Management of endophthalmitis with retained intraocular foreign body. Eye. Feb 2004;18(2):179-82. [Medline].
Kuhn F, Heimann K. [A new permanent magnet for removal of intra-ocular ferromagnetic foreign bodies]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. Apr 1991;198(4):301-3. [Medline].
Kuhn F, Mester V, Morris R. A proactive treatment approach for eyes with perforating injury. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. Aug 2004;221(8):622-8. [Medline].
Kuhn F, Mester V, Morris R. Intraocular foreign bodies. In: Ocular Trauma: Principles and Practice. New York: Thieme; 2002:235-263.
Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. Intraocular foreign body (posterior segment). In: Masters Techniques in Ophthalmic Surgery. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins;. 1995:1201-1212.
Kumar A, Kumar V, Dapling RB. Traumatic cataract and intralenticular foreign body. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. Dec 2005;33(6):660-1. [Medline].
Lo Bue TD, Deutsch TA, Lobick J. Detection and localization of nonmetallic intraocular foreign bodies by magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(2):260-1.
Lubniewski A, Olk RJ, Grand MG. Ocular dangers in the garden. A new menace--nylon line lawn trimmers. Ophthalmology. Jul 1988;95(7):906-10. [Medline].
Mader TH, Carroll RD, Slade CS, et al. Ocular war injuries of the Iraqi Insurgency, January-September 2004. Ophthalmology. Jan 2006;113(1):97-104. [Medline].
Michels RG, Rice TA. Bimanual bipolar diathermy for treatment of bleeding from the anterior chamber angle. Am J Ophthalmol. Dec 1977;84(6):873-4. [Medline].
Mieler WF, Ellis MK, Williams DF, et al. Retained intraocular foreign bodies and endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. Nov 1990;97(11):1532-8. [Medline].
Penner R, Passmore JW. Magnetic vs nonmagnetic intraocular foreign bodies. An ultrasonic determination. Arch Ophthalmol. Nov 1966;76(5):676-7. [Medline].
Percival SP. A decade of intraocular foreign bodies. Br J Ophthalmol. Jun 1972;56(6):454-61. [Medline].
Potts AM, Distler JA. Shape factor in the penetration of intraocular foreign bodies. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;100:183-187.
Roper-Hall MJ. Review of 555 cases of intraocular foreign body with special references to prognosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1954;38:65-99.
Smiddy WE, Hamburg TR, Kracher GP, et al. Contact lenses for visual rehabilitation after corneal laceration repair. Ophthalmology. Mar 1989;96(3):293-8. [Medline].
Soheilian M, Abolhasani A, Ahmadieh H, et al. Management of magnetic intravitreal foreign bodies in 71 eyes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. Sep-Oct 2004;35(5):372-8. [Medline].
Sternberg P Jr, de Juan E Jr, Michels RG, et al. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries. Am J Ophthalmol. Oct 15 1984;98(4):467-72. [Medline].
Thach AB, Ward TP, Dick JS, et al. Intraocular foreign body injuries during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Ophthalmology. Oct 2005;112(10):1829-33. [Medline].
Thompson JT, Parver LM, Enger CL, et al. Infectious endophthalmitis after penetrating injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. National Eye Trauma System. Ophthalmology. Oct 1993;100(10):1468-74. [Medline].
Weissgold DJ, Kaushal P. Late onset of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments after successful posterior segment intraocular foreign body removal. Br J Ophthalmol. Mar 2005;89(3):327-31. [Medline].
Williams DF, Mieler WF, Abrams GW, et al. Results and prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. Jul 1988;95(7):911-6. [Medline].
Williams S, Char DH, Dillon WP, et al. Ferrous intraocular foreign bodies and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Ophthalmol. Apr 15 1988;105(4):398-401. [Medline].
Wong TY, Tielsch JM. A population-based study on the incidence of severe ocular trauma in Singapore. Am J Ophthalmol. Sep 1999;128(3):345-51. [Medline].
Zinreich SJ, Miller NR, Aguayo JB, et al. Computed tomographic three-dimensional localization and compositional evaluation of intraocular and orbital foreign bodies. Arch Ophthalmol. Oct 1986;104(10):1477-82. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
intraocular foreign body, IOFB, intraocular foreign bodies, IOFBs, endophthalmitis, ocular trauma, eye injury
Overview: Foreign Body, Intraocular