eMedicine Specialties > Orthopedic Surgery > Biomechanics

Metallic Alloys

Author: Arturo Corces, MD, Adjunct Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine; Director, Implant Service, Miami Institute for Joint Reconstruction; Consulting Staff, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars Hospital
Coauthor(s): Michael Garcia, University of Florida at Gainesville
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 3, 2010

Introduction

Metal has been used extensively in the manufacturing of orthopedic implants in a multitude of different forms. Multiple different materials throughout history have been tested as replacements for bone. Materials as diverse as ivory, wood, rubber, acrylic, and Bakelite have been used in the manufacture of prosthetic implants.

The extensive use in modern times of metallic alloys is related to the availability and success at the beginning of the 20th century of several different alloys made of the noble metals. Implants made from iron, cobalt, chromium, titanium, and tantalum are commonly used. Clinical studies have demonstrated that alloys made from these metals can be used safely and effectively in the manufacturing of orthopedic implants that are left in vivo for extended periods. The mechanical, biologic, and physical properties of these materials play significant roles in the longevity of these implants.

Examples of metallic-alloy implants are shown below:

Metallic alloys. Tantalum (left) and titanium (ri...

Metallic alloys. Tantalum (left) and titanium (right) fiber mesh acetabular cups.

Metallic alloys. Tantalum (left) and titanium (ri...

Metallic alloys. Tantalum (left) and titanium (right) fiber mesh acetabular cups.


Metallic alloys. Stainless steel Charnley stem (l...

Metallic alloys. Stainless steel Charnley stem (left) and a cobalt-chromium Mueller (right).

Metallic alloys. Stainless steel Charnley stem (l...

Metallic alloys. Stainless steel Charnley stem (left) and a cobalt-chromium Mueller (right).


Metallic alloys. Composite stems combine the phys...

Metallic alloys. Composite stems combine the physical properties of alloys with those of other biomaterials. Note, ceramic or metal femoral heads are used on composite hip stems because composites have relatively poor wear properties.

Metallic alloys. Composite stems combine the phys...

Metallic alloys. Composite stems combine the physical properties of alloys with those of other biomaterials. Note, ceramic or metal femoral heads are used on composite hip stems because composites have relatively poor wear properties.


Implants are made in 3 basic ways:

  • Implants can be machine milled or drilled into a desired shape.
  • Implants can be cast, which means that the implant is formed from molten metal that is poured into a mold.
  • Implants can be forged, which means that the implant is shaped into its final form with the use of forces such as bending or hammering.

Alloys that provide for a long-term stable implant need to have a high level of corrosion resistance as well as certain mechanical properties (see Immune Response to Implants).

Recent studies

Dalury et al followed 96 patients for 5 years who had undergone total hip arthroplasty with single titanium stems. The average Harris Hip score was 96 points (range, 73-100 points) at final follow-up, and radiographically, all stems were ingrown. No stem had more than 3 mm of subsidence, and there were no leg-length discrepancies more than 5 mm. The authors concluded that the titanium stem is a versatile option for total hip arthroplasty.1

Grupp et al reported their experience regarding failed modular titanium neck adapters, in combination with a titanium alloy modular short hip stem, after hip arthroplasty, as a result of fretting or corrosion. They were then replaced by cobalt-chromium adapters. The authors noted that by the end of 2008, 1.4% (68 of approximately 5000) of the implanted titanium alloy neck adapters failed at an average of 2 years' time (0.7 to 4.0 years) postoperatively. The investigators concluded that failure of modular titanium alloy neck adapters can be initiated by surface micromotions due to surface contamination or highly loaded implant components. In the study, according to the authors, the patients at risk were men with an average weight over 100 kg. They added that with a cobalt-chromium neck, micromotions can be reduced by a factor of 3 and the incidence of fretting corrosion substantially lowered.2

Metals

An element is considered metallic if a positive charge is demonstrated on an electrolysis test.3 This test consists of dissolving the element in acid and running a current through the solution. When such elements are fully reduced, their metallic nature is recognized and they and their alloys are called metals; when oxidized, they can serve as ceramic materials.4

Metals have several properties that are specific to them, including malleability, which allows the shaping of metal into implants, and ductility, which refers to the ability to draw out metal in the shape of wire and is an important property in allowing the manufacture of intramedullary rods, screws, and long stems. By combining several metallic elements together in alloys, improved properties can be achieved beyond those of a single element. The alloys used in orthopedic surgery need to have certain specific properties. Because the alloy of the implant is bathed in body fluid, a low rate of corrosion and relative inertness are imperative in the material.

All metallic alloys have a modulus of elasticity significantly higher than that of bone. This mechanical incompatibility causes implants to be structurally stiffer than bones. Alloys with elastic moduli closer to bone may cause less stress shielding.

Different metals can form a battery effect when in solution in the body. The galvanic series provides electrochemical comparisons that allow for predictions of corrosion between 2 different metals when they are in physical contact in saline solution.5 Galvanic corrosion occurs if stainless steel surgical wire is wrapped over a cobalt- or titanium-based alloy femoral component or if a cobalt-chromium femoral head is placed on a titanium alloy femoral stem, so this metal mismatch is not recommended. Cobalt- and titanium-based alloy components may be used in contact with each other, and stainless steel components, such as sutures, may be used with either if actual physical contact is avoided.

Surgical Stainless Steel

The introduction of steel plates for fracture treatment is credited to Sherman.6 Surgical stainless steel alloys (316L) made with varying amounts of iron, chromium, and nickel are presently used in the manufacture of prostheses. The low carbon (L) in surgical stainless steel diminishes corrosion and decreases adverse tissue responses and metal allergies. While many implants are still manufactured from this excellent material, its use is relegated mainly to plates, screws, and intramedullary devices that are not meant to be weight bearing for an extended period. Fatigue failure and relatively high corrosion rates make it a poor candidate for the manufacture of modern joint replacement implants.7

Chromium-containing iron (and cobalt base) alloys have a chromium oxide–based surface that is a result of passivation or oxidation of the surface. The chromium oxide forms a very thin invisible shield that provides resistance to biodegradation. Because this oxide layer slowly dissolves in vivo, these alloys have a relatively high rate of corrosion. This is evident as a propensity toward both fretting and crevice corrosion, which limits the possibility for biologic fixation or for the manufacture of modular implants.

Cobalt-Based Alloys

Venable and Stuck discovered the battery effects of metals in the body through their testing of the electrolytic effects of various metals on surrounding tissue and bone.3 These tests demonstrated the low level of corrosion of the cobalt-based alloy vitallium. Alloys made of cobalt, chromium, and molybdenum can be used in various different porous forms to allow for biologic fixation by ingrowth. These alloys are among the least ductile when compared to either iron- or titanium-based alloys, making manufacture of these intramedullary rods and spinal instrumentation more difficult. These alloys have some of the highest moduli of elasticity observed in orthopedic implants, and as a result, this was a factor in the stress shielding and thigh pain observed in the first generation of biologically fixed femoral hip implants made with cobalt alloys.8

These alloys are well suited for the production of implants that are designed to replace bone and to be load bearing for an extended period, if not permanently.

The Austin Moore prosthesis and the Thompson prosthesis were manufactured from the cobalt-based alloys. The first-generation biologically fixed implants (ie, porous-coated anatomic [PCA] and anatomic medullary locking [AML] implants) were manufactured of this material. Numerous modern prostheses are still manufactured from this excellent alloy and are used in both cemented and porous forms for hip and knee replacement.

Titanium-Based Alloys

In 1951, Levanthal introduced titanium as a metal for surgery.9 Titanium-based alloys have excellent properties for use in porous forms for biologic fixation of prostheses. The most common is Ti-6 aluminum Ti-4 vanadium (Ti6Al4V), but other more modern alloys are coming into use. Because of the lower moduli of elasticity than cobalt-based alloys or surgical stainless steel, titanium-based alloys have not been found to be as reliable a material when used as a cemented hip replacement. Moreover, its use in total knee replacements has been limited to the nonarticulating parts of the tibial component because of significant wear observed in femoral heads.10

Titanium's high level of biocompatibility, low level of corrosion, and modulus of elasticity closer to that of bone allow for its use in numerous porous implants that have yielded excellent long-term results. The low level of corrosion allows for the construction of modular implants that saves in inventory and allows for more precise implant fit.11

Current use in various forms is in the production of fracture plates and intramedullary rods and in the production of both femoral and acetabular implants designed for bone ingrowth. Fracture fixation components fabricated from titanium-based alloys are also used preferentially when the implant site is known to be infected or when postoperative shadow-free imaging is desired.

Tantalum and Composites

Tantalum

Tantalum is also remarkably resistant to corrosion and has been used as an ingredient in super alloys, principally in aircraft engines and spacecraft, although 50% of current use is in the form of powder metal for the manufacture of transistors and capacitors. Tantalum can be fabricated in a highly porous form, which has a modulus of elasticity closer to that of bone than stainless steel or the cobalt-based alloys. Tantalum balls have been used in studies that have required bone markers; however, it has not been used in the manufacture of implants until recently. Because of its remarkable resistance to corrosion, tantalum is well suited to a biologic ingrowth setting.

Recent use of tantalum has been in the form of a honeycombed structure that is extremely porous and conducive to bone ingrowth. It is currently available in several forms for bridging bone defects, but its use in the manufacture of femoral stems has yet to occur. Tantalum appears to be a promising metal for use in acetabular reconstruction, but long-term studies need to be conducted.12,13,11,14,15

Composites

The combination of metallic alloys with other biomaterials can result in implants with improved mechanical and physical properties. Current attempts in designing composite implants have not yielded highly successful results; however, the future possibilities for improvement are promising.

Wear

Different alloys demonstrate different rates of wear. The hardness of an alloy and the smoothness of the bearing surfaces determine its relative rate of wear. Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys and alloys made of stainless steel are more wear resistant than titanium or titanium-based alloys. When breakdown with titanium-based alloys occurs, it is often observed as black areas within the tissues.

Metallic ion release occurs in vivo, and numerous studies demonstrate soluble and precipitated corrosion products, as well as metallic wear debris, in the liver, spleen, lungs, and even remote bone marrow of the iliac crest. The constant motion of the metal-on-metal prosthesis causes a wearing away of the passivated surface and an increase in metallic ion release. The recent interest in metal-on-metal prostheses raises questions of biocompatibility and possible carcinogenic effects that these metallic ions can cause.16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24

Future Developments

Hopefully, further developments in metallurgy will allow for the development of new alloys that, when compared to current alloys, will have better mechanical and physical properties yielding better long-term results with implants.

The concurrent developments in other biomaterials, such as ceramics, and newer modified polyethylenes, such as cross-linked polyethylene, hopefully will result in improvements in longevity of total joint replacements either with the success of alternative bearing surfaces or with the use of composite materials. The total joint replacement that will last the life of the patient may be a reality one day.25,26

Multimedia

Metallic alloys. Tantalum (left) and titanium (ri...Media file 1: Metallic alloys. Tantalum (left) and titanium (right) fiber mesh acetabular cups.
Metallic alloys. Tantalum (left) and titanium (ri...

Metallic alloys. Tantalum (left) and titanium (right) fiber mesh acetabular cups.

Metallic alloys. Stainless steel Charnley stem (l...Media file 2: Metallic alloys. Stainless steel Charnley stem (left) and a cobalt-chromium Mueller (right).
Metallic alloys. Stainless steel Charnley stem (l...

Metallic alloys. Stainless steel Charnley stem (left) and a cobalt-chromium Mueller (right).

Metallic alloys. Composite stems combine the phys...Media file 3: Metallic alloys. Composite stems combine the physical properties of alloys with those of other biomaterials. Note, ceramic or metal femoral heads are used on composite hip stems because composites have relatively poor wear properties.
Metallic alloys. Composite stems combine the phys...

Metallic alloys. Composite stems combine the physical properties of alloys with those of other biomaterials. Note, ceramic or metal femoral heads are used on composite hip stems because composites have relatively poor wear properties.

Keywords

metallic alloys, surgical stainless-steel alloys, cobalt-based alloys, cobalt-chromium alloy, titanium-based alloys, tantalum, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys

 


More on Metallic Alloys

References
Further Reading

References

  1. Dalury DF, Gonzales RA, Adams MJ. Minimum 5-year results in 96 consecutive hips treated with a tapered titanium stem system. J Arthroplasty. Jan 2010;25(1):104-7. [Medline].

  2. Grupp TM, Weik T, Bloemer W, Knaebel HP. Modular titanium alloy neck adapter failures in hip replacement - failure mode analysis and influence of implant material. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. Jan 4 2010;11(1):3. [Medline].

  3. Venable CS, Stuck WG, Beach A. The effects on bone of the presence of the metals; based upon electrolysis. An experimental study. Ann Surg. 1937;105:917.

  4. Rahaman MN, Bal BS, Garino J, Ries M, Yao J. Ceramics for Prosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Replacement. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90:1965–1988.

  5. Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Urban RM. Corrosion of metal orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Feb 1998;80(2):268-82. [Medline].

  6. Sherman WO. Vanadium steel plates and screws. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1912;14:629.

  7. Yoo YR, Jang SG, Oh KT, Kim JG, Kim YS. Influences of passivating elements on the corrosion and biocompatibility of super stainless steels. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. Aug 2008;86B(2):310-20. [Medline].

  8. Galante JO. Causes of fractures of the femoral component in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(4):670-3. [Medline].

  9. Levanthal GC. Titanium: a metal for surgery. J Bone Joint Surg. 1951;33:473.

  10. Marx R, Faramarzi R, Jungwirth F, Kleffner BV, Mumme T, Weber M, et al. [Silicate coating of cemented titanium-based shafts in hip prosthetics reduces high aseptic loosening]. Z Orthop Unfall. Mar-Apr 2009;147(2):175-82. [Medline].

  11. Jafari SM, Bender B, Coyle C, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 2010;468(2):459-65. [Medline].

  12. Grelsamer RP. Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Mar 2007;15(3):137; author reply 137-8. [Medline].

  13. Levine B, Sporer S, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ, Paprosky W. Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg. Jul 2007;20(3):185-94. [Medline].

  14. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 2010;468(2):454-8. [Medline].

  15. Harrison AK, Gioe TJ, Simonelli C, Tatman PJ, Schoeller MC. Do Porous Tantalum Implants Help Preserve Bone?: Evaluation of Tibial Bone Density Surrounding Tantalum Tibial Implants in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Jan 12 2010;[Medline].

  16. Benz EB, Sherburne B, Hayek JE, et al. Lymphadenopathy associated with total joint prostheses. A report of two cases and a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 1996;78(4):588-93. [Medline].

  17. Case CP, Langkamer VG, James C, et al. Widespread dissemination of metal debris from implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Sep 1994;76(5):701-12. [Medline].

  18. Nyren O, McLaughlin JK, Gridley G, et al. Cancer risk after hip replacement with metal implants: a population-based cohort study in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst. Jan 4 1995;87(1):28-33. [Medline].

  19. Olmedo DG, Tasat DR, Duffó G, Guglielmotti MB, Cabrini RL. The issue of corrosion in dental implants: a review. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2009;22(1):3-9. [Medline].

  20. Lévesque J, Hermawan H, Dubé D, Mantovani D. Design of a pseudo-physiological test bench specific to the development of biodegradable metallic biomaterials. Acta Biomater. Mar 2008;4(2):284-95. [Medline].

  21. Mitchell A, Shrotriya P. Mechanical load-assisted dissolution of metallic implant surfaces: influence of contact loads and surface stress state. Acta Biomater. Mar 2008;4(2):296-304. [Medline].

  22. Lemons JE, Lucas LC. Properties of biomaterials. J Arthroplasty. 1986;1(2):143-7. [Medline].

  23. Lützner J, Dinnebier G, Hartmann A, Günther KP, Kirschner S. Study rationale and protocol: prospective randomized comparison of metal ion concentrations in the patient's plasma after implantation of coated and uncoated total knee prostheses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. Oct 14 2009;10:128. [Medline].

  24. Vendittoli PA, Roy A, Mottard S, Girard J, Lusignan D, Lavigne M. Metal ion release from bearing wear and corrosion with 28 mm and large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing articulations: a follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jan 2010;92(1):12-9. [Medline].

  25. Bal BS, Garino J, Ries M, Rahaman MN. A Review of Ceramic Bearing Materials in Total Joint Arthroplasty. Hip International 2007. 17:21-30.

  26. Li S, Burstein AH. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. The material and its use in total joint implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1994;76(7):1080-90. [Medline].

  27. Engh CA Jr, Moore KD, Vinh TN, Engh GA. Titanium prosthetic wear debris in remote bone marrow. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Nov 1997;79(11):1721-5. [Medline].

  28. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop. Jun 1979;(141):17-27. [Medline].

  29. Hallab N, Merritt K, Jacobs JJ. Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 2001;83-A(3):428-36. [Medline].

  30. Huo MH, Cook SM. What's New in Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 2001;83-A(10):1598-610. [Medline].

Further Reading

Related eMedicine topics

Immune Response to Implants

Complications of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Acetabular Wear in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical guidelines

Total knee replacement. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Panel on Total Knee Replacement - Independent Expert Panel. 2004 Feb 17. 18 pages. NGC:003622


Clinical trials

Comparison Study of Biofoam Porous Metal Versus Allograft to Treat Adult Acquired Flatfoot

Serum Metal Ion Concentration After Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)


Keywords

metallic alloys, surgical stainless-steel alloys, cobalt-based alloys, cobalt-chromium alloy, titanium-based alloys, tantalum, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Arturo Corces, MD, Adjunct Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine; Director, Implant Service, Miami Institute for Joint Reconstruction; Consulting Staff, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars Hospital
Arturo Corces, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Michael Garcia, University of Florida at Gainesville
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Jonathan Black, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Bioengineering, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University
Jonathan Black, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Orthopaedic Research Society, and Sigma Xi
Disclosure: Stryker Orthopaedics Consulting fee Consulting

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Michael Yaszemski, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Bioengineering, Mayo Foundation, Mayo Medical School
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital
Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS, Frank J Kloenne Chair in Orthopedic Surgery, Professor and Chair, Department of Orthopedics, The Ohio State University Medical Center
Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Diabetes Association, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Missouri State Medical Association, Musculoskeletal Infection Society, Southern Medical Association, Southern Orthopaedic Association, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Orthopaedic Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.