Treatment
Medical Therapy
Management of these complex injuries has evolved with the understanding of isolated upper extremity fracture stabilization. While the goals are the same, treatment guidelines for children and adults differ slightly. Regardless of age, initial management should include provisional immobilization of the fractures and appropriate debridement of open fracture wounds (see image below). Administer intravenous (IV) antibiotics to patients with open fractures.
Initial management of the Monteggia injury consisted of debridement and irrigation of the extensively contaminated ulna fracture and application of an external fixator for stability and reduction of the radial head dislocation. The humeral fracture was splinted.
Vascular status of the limb must be assessed carefully. If a disruption is present or suspected, surgical consultation and coordination of management needs for the combined injury should take place.
Surgical Therapy
Neurologic deficit is a point of controversy, especially in those with a mid or distal shaft humerus fracture. When deciding whether to explore a nerve that presents with a deficit, a number of factors should be taken into consideration, including the mechanism of injury, location of fracture or fractures and their personality, approach to surgical intervention, and when the deficit was discovered (before or after reduction).
Determine the type of fracture management and soft-tissue coverage on a case-by-case basis. Some surgeons may elect to span the fractures with an external fixator until other patient care issues can be resolved. Others may elect to stage the procedures or fix both fracture complexes at once. All of these options are acceptable as long as the primary fracture principles are respected.
While the goals are the same, treatment guidelines for children and adults differ slightly. Studies by Moed et al8 and Grace et al2 have shown that immediate internal fixation of both bone forearm fractures in adults with early range of motion provide the patient with a stable construct that allows for accelerated rehabilitation and return to function. Operative treatment of isolated humerus fractures in adults has its role in some instances, but for the most part, these injuries do well when treated in a closed manner with functional bracing. Treat the combination of these injuries in the same extremity as a unit and not as separate entities. Rogers et al10 reviewed their series of floating elbows and found a high rate of humeral nonunion with closed treatment of the humeral fracture. Lange et al7 reviewed their experience with this injury and found that only patients who underwent operative management of the humeral fracture obtained a satisfactory result.
Operative management of the humeral component should consist of either rigid plate fixation (as depicted in the radiograph below) or locked intramedullary nailing of the fracture. These techniques allow for stable fixation of the fracture site and provide the best chance for union. Rigid fixation of these injuries allows for early range of motion of all joints in the affected extremity. This allows for easier rehabilitation of concomitant injuries. In children, treat supracondylar humerus fractures with closed (open if needed) reduction and percutaneous pinning. Little controversy exists about this component of the floating elbow. This option has provided the patient with the best opportunity for union of the distal humerus fracture without significant deformity. In children, acceptable results have been achieved with closed reduction of the forearm fracture, with or without percutaneous pinning.
Definitive management of the fractures was performed with plate fixation.
The treating surgeon should base the treatment decision on the stability of the fracture reduction and the likelihood of achieving union without angulation. The opportunity for skeletal remodeling also factors into this decision, as well as the type of fixation required. Tailor rehabilitation to the individual injury pattern, with advancement of activity as fracture union progresses and muscle function returns.19,21
Complications
Complications of treatment for floating elbow mirror those of other complex fracture treatment problems. Significant neurovascular injury may accompany these injuries. These range from simple isolated nerve palsy to complex brachial plexus lesions with axillary/brachial artery injury/disruption. The cumulative incidence of some type of associated neurovascular injury in children and adults is 25-45%. Loss of range of motion in the elbow and forearm axis is not uncommon, even with anatomic restoration of all fractures.
Infection is a notable complication, especially in those who sustain open fractures and require debridement and immediate internal fixation. A delay in definitive fixation until the soft tissues are in a condition in which appropriate skeletal management can be defined may be wise. Malunion and nonunion can result from a number of factors, including persistent infection, inadequate fixation, poor soft-tissue envelope, and poor technique.
Attention to proper surgical methods and an understanding of the severity of the injury assist the treating surgeon in minimizing these occurrences.
More on Floating Elbow |
| Overview: Floating Elbow |
| Workup: Floating Elbow |
 Treatment: Floating Elbow |
| Follow-up: Floating Elbow |
| Multimedia: Floating Elbow |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Bhuller GS, Hardy AE. Ipsilateral elbow and forearm injuries in children. Aust N Z J Surg. Feb 1981;51(1):65-8. [Medline].
Grace TG, Eversmann WW Jr. Forearm fractures: treatment by rigid fixation with early motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 1980;62(3):433-8. [Medline].
Grant JCB, Basmajian J. Grant's Method of Anatomy: a Clinical Problem-Solving Approach. 11th ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1989:387-406.
Harrington P, Sharif I, Fogarty EE, et al. Management of the floating elbow injury in children. Simultaneous ipsilateral fractures of the elbow and forearm. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(3-4):205-8. [Medline].
Hoppenfeld S, deBoer P, Thomas H. Surgical Exposures in Orthopaedics: The Anatomic Approach. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1994:1-146.
Jones JA. Immediate internal fixation of high-energy open forearm fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5(3):272-9. [Medline].
Lange RH, Foster RJ. Skeletal management of humeral shaft fractures associated with forearm fractures. Clin Orthop. May 1985;(195):173-7. [Medline].
Moed BR, Kellam JF, Foster RJ, et al. Immediate internal fixation of open fractures of the diaphysis of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 1986;68(7):1008-17. [Medline].
Papavasiliou V, Nenopoulos S. Ipsilateral injuries of the elbow and forearm in children. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan-Feb 1986;6(1):58-60. [Medline].
Rogers JF, Bennett JB, Tullos HS. Management of concomitant ipsilateral fractures of the humerus and forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 1984;66(4):552-6. [Medline].
Sarup S, Bryant PA. Ipsilateral humeral shaft and Galeazzi fractures with a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow: a variant of the "floating dislocated elbow.". J Trauma. Aug 1997;43(2):349-52. [Medline].
Simpson NS, Jupiter JB. Complex fracture patterns of the upper extremity. Clin Orthop. Sep 1995;(318):43-53. [Medline].
Stanitski CL, Micheli LJ. Simultaneous ipsilateral fractures of the arm and forearm in children. Clin Orthop. Nov-Dec 1980;(153):218-22. [Medline].
Templeton PA, Graham HK. The ''floating elbow'' in children. Simultaneous supracondylar fractures of the humerus and of the forearm in the same upper limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Sep 1995;77(5):791-6. [Medline].
Viegas SF, Gogan W, Riley S. Floating dislocated elbow: case report and review of the literature. J Trauma. Jun 1989;29(6):886-8. [Medline].
Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C, et al. Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results. J Orthop Trauma. May 1997;11(4):283-7. [Medline].
Wallny TA, Wietoska I, Kastning S, Westermann K. [Functional fracture treatment of the forearm. The indications and results]. Chirurg. Nov 1997;68(11):1126-31. [Medline].
Yokoyama K, Itoman M, Kobayashi A, et al. Functional outcomes of "floating elbow" injuries in adult patients. J Orthop Trauma. May 1998;12(4):284-90. [Medline].
Serra C, Delattre O, Dintimille H, Dib C, Rouvillain JL, Catonne Y. [Allograft-prosthesis composite arthroplasty for posttraumatic floating elbow]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. May 2006;92(3):269-74. [Medline].
De Carli P, Boretto JG, Bourgeois WO, Gallucci GL. Floating dislocated elbow: a variant with articular fracture of the humerus. J Trauma. Feb 2006;60(2):421-2. [Medline].
Solomon HB, Zadnik M, Eglseder WA. A review of outcomes in 18 patients with floating elbow. J Orthop Trauma. Sep 2003;17(8):563-70. [Medline].
Ring D, Waters PM, Hotchkiss RN, Kasser JR. Pediatric floating elbow. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 2001;21(4):456-9. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
floating elbow, traffic elbow, sideswipe injuries, elbow pain, humerus fracture, radius fracture, ulna fracture
