Hallux Valgus Workup

  • Author: Crista J Frank, DPM; Chief Editor: Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS   more...
 
Updated: Feb 17, 2012
 

Laboratory Studies

  • Generally, laboratory studies are not required for a routine assessment.
  • However, if systemic or metabolic disease is suspected, the following studies can be of value in determining etiology or disease activity:
    • Uric acid
    • Sedimentation rate
    • C-reactive protein
    • Antinuclear antibody (ANA)
    • Rheumatoid factor
Next

Imaging Studies

  • Radiographic views: Radiography continues to be the standard means with which to assess joint pathology and measure angular deformity. Weightbearing anteroposterior (AP), lateral oblique (LO), lateral (LAT) projections, and sesamoid axial view should be obtained in the angle and base of gait (see images below). Non–weightbearing radiographs may reveal the osseous relationships differently, causing an improper selection of surgical procedure. Weightbearing radiographs demonstrate the structural status of the foot. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, weight-beAnteroposterior and lateral radiographs, weight-bearing views. The medial bony enlargement is more prominent on tThe medial bony enlargement is more prominent on this lateral oblique projection than on other views.
    • The AP projection is used to determine the intermetatarsal angle, metatarsus adductus angle, hallux abductus angle, proximal articular set angle, and hallux abductus interphalangeus, as well as the first metatarsal length, sesamoid position, first metatarsophalangeal joint condition, bone stock, first metatarsal base, hallux rotation, and medial metatarsal head enlargement (see images below). Template showing angular measurements. Template showing angular measurements. Another template showing increase angular relationAnother template showing increase angular relationships.
    • The LAT projection is used to determine first metatarsal sagittal plane position and dorsal exostosis and/or osteophytes.
    • The LO projection is useful in evaluating bone stock and presence of dorsomedial exostosis. Because the bunion is located on the dorsomedial aspect of the metatarsal head, the prominence may be appreciated fully only in an oblique view.
    • In the sesamoid axial view, the sesamoids are observed for any lateral subluxation out of their respective grooves. As well, the crista is evaluated for erosion created by this subluxation. The joint sesamoid-metatarsal joint space is also examined for degenerative changes.
  • Radiographic angular relationships: various angles, structures, and positions are assessed as listed below.
    • Intermetatarsal angle: Normal is 8-12° in a rectus foot and 8-10° in an adductus foot type. This angle is the relationship between the longitudinal axis of the first and second metatarsal. If the angle is increased, the condition is termed metatarsus primus adductus.
    • Metatarsus adductus: Normal is less than 15°; more than 15° is considered adductus. This angle is the relationship between the longitudinal axis of the lesser tarsus and the second metatarsal. This angle indicates whether the forefoot is in a rectus or adducted attitude in reference to the rearfoot. The rectus foot has a metatarsus adductus angle less than 15°. An angle larger than 15° causes the hallux valgus deformity to appear more severe than it actually is.
    • Hallux abductus angle: The normal upper limit is 15-20°. This angle is the abduction of the longitudinal bisection of the proximal phalanx and first metatarsal; it is also known as the first metatarsal phalangeal angle. This is the primary method for quantification of the hallux abductus, either positional or structural.
    • Proximal articular set angle: The normal upper limit is 7.5°. This is a measurement of the structural position of the first metatarsal head cartilage. It is used in determining whether the joint is congruent, deviated, or subluxated (see image below). Congruency of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.Congruency of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.
    • Distal articular set angle: The upper limit of normal is 7.5°. This angle detects structural abnormalities of the proximal phalanx base. Abnormalities may indicate the need for proximal phalanx osteotomies. The angle is determined by longitudinal bisection of the proximal phalanx of the hallux with reference to a line that connects the medial and lateral extents of the proximal phalangeal articular surface. The degree of abduction of the phalangeal bisection away from 90° determines this angle.[3]
    • Sesamoid position: Positions 1-3 are normal, and the range is 1-7 (see image below). In pathologic hallux valgus, the crista often is eroded as a result of the laterally deviated position of the sesamoids. The sesamoid position represents the degree of lateral subluxation of the sesamoid apparatus. Tibial sesamoid position with bisection of the firTibial sesamoid position with bisection of the first metatarsal. Positions 1-3 are normal. Positions 4-7 indicate erosion of the crista and a laterally track-bound, nonreducible hallux valgus.
    • First metatarsal declination angle: Ranges from 15-30° are normal. This angle is determined by bisection of the first metatarsal shaft in reference to the weightbearing surface. This is a useful evaluation for selection of a procedure that includes plantarflexion of the metatarsal in the sagittal plane.
    • Hallux valgus interphalangeus angle: The upper limit of normal is 10°. A measurement larger than this indicates a structural deformity of either the proximal phalanx head or the distal phalanx base. This causes the hallux to have an abducted appearance, which occasionally is confused with a hallux valgus deformity. An inability to detect an abnormal angle may lead the surgeon to overcorrect a hallux abductus. The angle of abduction is determined on an AP view from longitudinal bisection of the proximal phalanx compared with longitudinal bisection of the distal phalanx.
  • Radiologic pathology: Radiographs may be useful in evaluating the condition of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. A couple aspects should be evaluated.
    • The first aspect is the width and uniformity of the joint space (see images below). Normally, the joint space appears uniform. An increase or irregularity is indicative of degenerative changes. Therefore, if the osteoarthritis is severe enough, a joint-destructive procedure should be entertained. Bunion deformity with minimal joint destruction. Bunion deformity with minimal joint destruction. Bunion deformity with significant joint destructioBunion deformity with significant joint destruction.
    • The joint should also be evaluated for osteophytes at the articular margins. The normal joint is free of osteophytes. Osteophytes are yet another indication of the severity of degeneration.
  • Radiographic bone stock: Radiography is an excellent method for determining the quality and density of bone.
    • In general, bone density should be uniform and trabeculation should be fine.
    • The head of the metatarsal should be evaluated for cysts. In the normal metatarsal head, cysts should not be observable. Cysts indicate structural adaptation of the bone to function and load, or systemic arthritis.
    • Severe osteopenia or cysts may preclude the use of various forms of internal fixation or osteotomy. Note any increased density of the second metatarsal, which indicates excessive forces on the second metatarsal due to instability of the first metatarsal. Stress fractures of the second metatarsal commonly occur in this setting (see image below). Large intermetatarsal angle and hallux abductovalgLarge intermetatarsal angle and hallux abductovalgus deformity secondary to previous injury. Note the increased cortical density of the second, third, and fourth metatarsals.
  • Other radiographic findings: Depictions of hallux valgus, the medial eminence, and the soft tissue are evaluated as well.
    • Hallux valgus: No valgus rotation, as noted by the symmetrical concavity of the borders the medial and lateral shafts, should be evident. Asymmetry indicates the need for a procedure to the proximal phalanx to derotate the hallux.
    • Medial eminence: The normal metatarsal head is free from excessive bony proliferation. Bony proliferation indicates an the imbalance of the joint with excessive medial tension.
    • Soft tissue: The soft tissues are evaluated for edema, bursae, calcification, or other signs of chronic inflammation.
  • Other imaging studies usually do not help in determining the degree of deformity or in evaluating the condition of the joint. However, one possible adjunct study is technetium 99m–labeled hydroxyapatite bone scanning to rule out osteomyelitis if ulceration is present and if the radiographic findings are inconclusive.
Previous
Next

Staging

Root et al described the pathomechanical development of hallux valgus in 4 stages.[4]

  • In stage 1, excessive pronation causes hypermobility of the first ray, causing the tibial sesamoid ligament to be stretched and the fibular sesamoid ligament to contract; lateral subluxation of the proximal phalanx occurs.
  • In stage 2, hallux abduction progresses, with the flexor hallucis longus and flexor hallucis brevis gaining lateral mechanical advantage.
  • In stage 3, further subluxation occurs at the first metatarsophalangeal joint, with formation of metatarsus primus adductus.
  • In stage 4, the first metatarsophalangeal joint finally dislocates.
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Crista J Frank, DPM  Podiatrist, Department of Orthopaedics, United States Naval Hospital, Okinawa, Japan

Crista J Frank, DPM is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons and American Podiatric Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Noriko Satake, MD  Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dan E Robinson, DPM  Chief, Section of Podiatry, Dwight D Eisenhower Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Christopher E Gentchos, MD  Orthopedic Surgeon, Concord Orthopaedics, PA

Christopher E Gentchos, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, and New Hampshire Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

John S Early, MD  Foot/Ankle Specialist, Texas Orthopaedic Associates, LLP; Co-Director, North Texas Foot and Ankle Fellowship, Baylor University Medical Center

John S Early, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: AO North America Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Osteotech Consulting fee Consulting; Stryker Consulting fee Consulting; Biomet Consulting fee Consulting; AO North America Grant/research funds fellowship funding; MMI inc Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Shepard R Hurwitz, MD  Executive Director, American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery

Shepard R Hurwitz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Rheumatology, American College of Sports Medicine, American College of Surgeons, American Diabetes Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Eastern Orthopaedic Association, Orthopaedic Research Society, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Southern Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS  Frank J Kloenne Chair in Orthopedic Surgery, Professor and Chair, Department of Orthopedics, The Ohio State University Medical Center

Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Diabetes Association, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Missouri State Medical Association, Musculoskeletal Infection Society, Southern Medical Association, Southern Orthopaedic Association, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous coauthor Dr Dale Dalenberg to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Shima H, Okuda R, Yasuda T, Jotoku T, Kitano N, Kinoshita M. Radiographic measurements in patients with hallux valgus before and after proximal crescentic osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 2009;91(6):1369-76. [Medline].

  2. Schuh R, Hofstaetter SG, Adams SB Jr, Pichler F, Kristen KH, Trnka HJ. Rehabilitation after hallux valgus surgery: importance of physical therapy to restore weight bearing of the first ray during the stance phase. Phys Ther. Sep 2009;89(9):934-45. [Medline].

  3. Smith BW, Coughlin MJ. Treatment of hallux valgus with increased distal metatarsal articular angle: use of double and triple osteotomies. Foot Ankle Clin. Sep 2009;14(3):369-82. [Medline].

  4. Root ML, Orien WP, Weed JH. Normal and Abnormal Function of the Foot. Vol 2. Los Angeles, Calif: Clinical Biomechanics; 1977.

  5. Hawke F, Burns J, Radford JA, du Toit V. Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jul 16 2008;CD006801. [Medline].

  6. Cancilleri F, Marinozzi A, Martinelli N, Ippolito M, Spiezia F, Ronconi P, et al. Comparison of plantar pressure, clinical, and radiographic changes of the forefoot after biplanar austin osteotomy and triplanar boc osteotomy in patients with mild hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. Aug 2008;29(8):817-24. [Medline].

  7. Lagaay PM, Hamilton GA, Ford LA, Williams ME, Rush SM, Schuberth JM. Rates of revision surgery using chevron-Austin osteotomy, Lapidus arthrodesis, and closing base wedge osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus deformity. J Foot Ankle Surg. Jul-Aug 2008;47(4):267-72. [Medline].

  8. McCarthy AD, Davies MB, Wembridge KR, Blundell C. Three-dimensional analysis of different first metatarsal osteotomies in a hallux valgus model. Foot Ankle Int. Jun 2008;29(6):606-12. [Medline].

  9. Grawe B, Parikh S, Crawford A, Tamai J. Hallux valgus interphalangeus deformity: A case series in the pediatric population. Foot Ankle Surg. Mar 2012;18(1):e4-8. [Medline].

  10. Lui TH, Chan KB. Technical tip: Reconstruction of medial collateral ligament in correction of hallux valgus deformity with primary medial collateral ligamentous insufficiency. Foot Ankle Surg. Mar 2012;18(1):66-73. [Medline].

  11. Elliot RR, Saxby TS, Whitehouse SL. Intraoperative imaging in hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Surg. Mar 2012;18(1):19-21. [Medline].

  12. Lin YC, Cheng YM, Chang JK, Chen CH, Huang PJ. Minimally Invasive Distal Metatarsal Osteotomy for Mild-to-moderate Hallux Valgus Deformity. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. Aug 2009;25(8):431-7. [Medline].

  13. Ferrari J. Bunions. Clin Evid (Online). Mar 11 2009;2009:[Medline].

  14. Banks AS. Avascular necrosis of the first metatarsal head. A different perspective. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Sep 1999;89(9):441-53. [Medline].

  15. Conklin MJ. Complications of hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Clin. 1998;3:19-31.

  16. Vianna VF, Myerson MS. Complications of hallux valgus surgery: Management of the short first metatarsal and the failed resection arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin. 1998;3:33-49.

  17. Duan X, Kadakia AR. Salvage of recurrence after failed surgical treatment of hallux valgus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Dec 29 2011;[Medline].

  18. Mann RA, Rudicel S, Graves SC. Repair of hallux valgus with a distal soft-tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 1992;74(1):124-9. [Medline].

  19. Pressman MM, Stano GW, Krantz MK, Novicki DC. Correction of hallux valgus with positionally increased intermetatarsal angle. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Nov 1986;76(11):611-6. [Medline].

  20. Banks AS, Downey MS, Martin DE, Miller S, eds. McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

  21. Berquist TH. Radiology of the Foot and Ankle. 2nd ed. 2000.

  22. Butterworth R, Dockery GL. Surgical Procedures of the First Ray. In: Color Atlas and Text of Forefoot Surgery. 1992: 195-236.

  23. David RD, Delagoutte JP, Renard MM. Anatomical study of the sesamoid bones of the first metatarsal. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Nov 1989;79(11):536-44. [Medline].

  24. Gerbert J, ed. Textbook of Bunion Surgery. 2nd ed. Mt Kisco, NY: Futura Publishing Company;. 1991.

  25. Jahss MH. Disorders of the hallux and first ray. In: Disorders of the Foot and Ankle. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1991: 943-1174.

  26. Jones KJ, Feiwell LA, Freedman EL, Cracchiolo A 3rd. The effect of chevron osteotomy with lateral capsular release on the blood supply to the first metatarsal head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Feb 1995;77(2):197-204. [Medline].

  27. Kelikian H. Clarification of terminology. In: Hallux Valgus, Allied Deformities of the Forefoot and Metatarsalgia. 1965: 7-26.

  28. Mann RA, Coughlin MJ, eds. The great toe. In: The Video Textbook of Foot & Ankle Surgery. Vol. I. St. Louis: Medical Video Productions;. 1990: 146-170.

  29. Romash MM, Fugate D, Yanklowit B. Passive motion of the first metatarsal cuneiform joint: preoperative assessment. Foot Ankle. Jun 1990;10(6):293-8. [Medline].

  30. Sarrafian SK. Anatomy of the Foot and Ankle. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1993.

  31. Schoenhaus HD, Cohen RS. Etiology of the bunion. J Foot Surg. Jan-Feb 1992;31(1):25-9. [Medline].

  32. Schuberth JM. The American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons Preferred Practice Guidelines. Hallux valgus in the healthy adult. 1998.

  33. Valmassy RL. Clinical biomechanics of the lower extremities. 1996.

  34. Wooster M, Davies B, Catanzariti A. Effect of sesamoid position on long-term results of hallux abducto valgus surgery. J Foot Surg. Nov-Dec 1990;29(6):543-50. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Rheumatoid arthritis. Note the greater deformity of the right foot (image left) versus the left foot (image right).
Rheumatoid arthritis. Note the lateral deviation of the hallux, the cystic changes of the metatarsal head, and the hammertoe of the lesser digits.
Line of pull of the extensor hallucis longus causing the metatarsal to deviate medially and hallux to deviate laterally.
Non–weight-bearing foot. Note the medial prominence, contracture of extensor hallucis longus, and callus on the second digit.
Non–weight-bearing foot with range of motion being assessed of the first ray, which is currently in neutral (neither plantarflexed or dorsiflexed) position.
Lateral view of the first metatarsophalangeal joint with ligaments of the sesamoid complex.
Plantar muscles that contribute to the deforming forces.
Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, weight-bearing views.
The medial bony enlargement is more prominent on this lateral oblique projection than on other views.
Template showing angular measurements.
Another template showing increase angular relationships.
Congruency of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.
Tibial sesamoid position with bisection of the first metatarsal. Positions 1-3 are normal. Positions 4-7 indicate erosion of the crista and a laterally track-bound, nonreducible hallux valgus.
Bunion deformity with minimal joint destruction.
Bunion deformity with significant joint destruction.
Large intermetatarsal angle and hallux abductovalgus deformity secondary to previous injury. Note the increased cortical density of the second, third, and fourth metatarsals.
Algorithm for choosing surgical correction of hallux abductovalgus. Click image to enlarge.
Hallux abductovalgus deformity.
Postoperative radiograph obtained after head osteotomy.
Preoperative radiograph.
Postoperative radiograph shows Keller, or resectional, arthroplasty.
Preoperative radiograph shows degenerative joint disease.
Postoperative radiograph obtained after resectional arthroplasty and total joint implant placement.
Preoperative template for implant placement.
Preoperative radiograph shows arthrodesis.
Postoperative radiograph show arthrodesis.
Preoperative radiograph shows a hypermobile first ray.
Postoperative radiograph shows arthrodesis of the first metatarsocuneiform.
Lateral release sequence: (1) release of the conjoined adductor hallucis tendon, (2) release of the fibular sesamoid ligament, (3) tenotomy of the lateral head of the flexor hallucis brevis, and (4) excision of the fibular sesamoid.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.