Lisfranc Fracture Dislocation Treatment & Management

  • Author: Saul G Trevino, MD; Chief Editor: Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS   more...
 
Updated: Feb 17, 2012
 

Medical Therapy

Medical treatment is reserved for injuries that are anatomically stable and nondisplaced. This type of injury is best labeled as a sprain, although associated fractures in the surrounding bone may be present (eg, MT fracture). An athlete with a stable Lisfranc injury usually cannot compete for the remainder of the season. Early return to high-level activity can lead to chronic pain and progressive arthropathy. Therefore, athletes should be given special consideration.

Initial treatment should consist of a well-molded, non – weight-bearing, short leg cast worn for a minimum of 6 weeks. Advancement of ambulation depends on resolution of symptoms. Because many of these injuries initially present with midfoot edema that may help to stabilize damaged tissues, all stable injuries should be re-examined approximately 2 weeks following injury. Obtain weight-bearing radiographs at 4-6 weeks to ensure continued anatomic alignment.

After 6 weeks, progressive weight bearing can be allowed in a well-molded cast, advancing as comfort allows. When full weight bearing in a cast is comfortable, the patient can be advanced to a supportive shoe and reconditioning. The patient can be advanced to an accommodative orthotic with a contoured carbon shank so as to minimize midfoot stress.

Combined closed reduction and casting has no role in the treatment of unstable injuries. Constantly maintaining reduction with casting alone has proven to be too difficult. In addition, interposing soft tissues can impede closed reduction. For example, the anterior tibial tendon can block reduction of a lateral Lisfranc dislocation; similarly, the peroneus brevis tendon can block a medial dislocation reduction.

Next

Surgical Therapy

All injuries that are displaced and unstable require surgery.[25] Complete assessment of the intercuneiform and cuboid integrity is important when determining stability. Clinical outcome is highly dependent on restoration of normal anatomic alignment. Present recommendations for treatment consist of open reduction of the unstable area, as well as rigid fixation, with an option in terms of the screws employed, such as 3.5-mm cortical screws or 4.0-4.5 cannulated screws (depending on the size of the bone).[26] Multiple Kirschner wires (K-wires) also have been advocated, but maintaining reduction with them is more difficult (see image below).[27] In fact, screw fixation has been shown to have significantly greater biomechanical stability than does K-wire fixation.[28]

Standard anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates aStandard anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates a Lisfranc fracture dislocation. Determining the extent of fracture involving the joint is difficult with plain radiographs.

Guide wires should be placed carefully under fluoroscopic control to avoid multiple passes through the involved joint. In addition, they should be placed plantar to the midline to avoid fractures.

Other alternatives include the use of primary arthrodesis of the first, second, and third MT-cuneiform joints; suture button fixation; or dorsal bridge plating; however, the current evidence supporting the use of these techniques is modest at best.[29]

Presentation variations

  • Pure dislocation - Openly reduce all joints and follow with fixation of the medial joints with 3.5-mm cortical screws. Once anatomically aligned and fixed, the lateral 2 joints can be stabilized with 1.6-mm K-wires, if needed to maintain position. Wires are often not required, due to the ligamentous interconnections (see images below). CT scan in the coronal plane can demonstrate the eCT scan in the coronal plane can demonstrate the extent of injury at the joint. Compare with the plain radiograph of this injury in the related image. Note the plantar avulsion, suggesting severe disruption of the plantar ligamentous structures. This diagram depicts the suggested fixation order This diagram depicts the suggested fixation order of placement and alignment of screws for surgical fixation of unstable Lisfranc injuries. Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstratPreoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates a Lisfranc dislocation. Preoperative lateral radiograph demonstrates a LisPreoperative lateral radiograph demonstrates a Lisfranc dislocation.
  • Proximal instability - This includes tarsal instability and longitudinal impaction injuries that can disrupt the normal arcade of the TMT joints. Openly reduce and hold with fixation screws any instability between tarsal bones. If necessary, a mini-external fixator can be used to control proximal migration and comminution. Anatomically restore any shortening of the tarsals, and graft the defect with a structural graft from the iliac crest or proximal tibia. If more than 50% of the joint surface is destroyed, perform primary fusion among the involved bones to preserve long-term stability. Treatment then can proceed as it would for a pure dislocation (see images below). Postoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstraPostoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates reduction and fixation of Lisfranc dislocation. Postoperative lateral radiograph illustrates placePostoperative lateral radiograph illustrates placement of fixation screws for stabilization of Lisfranc joint.
  • Distal fractures - MT fractures distal to the Lisfranc joint sometimes can interfere with stable fixation. In these instances, use intramedullary K-wires in conjunction with open reduction to anatomically realign the foot (see images below). Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstratPreoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates a Lisfranc injury with proximal tarsal instability. The medial cuneiform is displaced medially, bringing the joint line level with the second. The proximal anatomy must be restored and stabilized before addressing the tarsometatarsal joint. Postoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstraPostoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates restoration of normal midfoot alignment. Screw fixation was used to stabilize the cuneiform prior to realigning the Lisfranc joint. Due to comminution of the second and third metatarsal shafts, Kirschner wires were used to hold their position. In this case, due to continued instability, a wire through the fourth tarsometatarsal joint was also used.
  • Interarticular injury - This involves destruction of the articular surface through either bony fracture or through traumatic removal of cartilage from the subchondral bone. Anatomically restore large fragments. Remove interarticular debris, and assess the remaining joint. If greater than 50% of the joint surface of the medial 3 joints is destroyed, consider acute fusion of these joints. Irrespective of the amount of damage to the articular surface of the lateral 2 joints, they should never undergo acute fusion.
  • Patients with diabetes - If the dislocation is found acutely before onset of significant Charcot arthropathy, arthrodesis of the involved first, second, and third TMT joints can be beneficial. Take special care to document that blood flow is adequate for healing from the surgical procedure (transcutaneous pressure of oxygen [tcPO2] or toe pressure >40 mm Hg). Fuse the medial 3 TMT joints, regardless of their articular integrity. Prolonged non–weight-bearing in a total contact cast is necessary to prevent reinjury due to neuropathy. Casting should be changed every 2 weeks. Weight-bearing status is assessed by evidence of solid fusion on follow-up radiographs. Fusions frequently take twice as long as nonneuropathic patients.
Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

Often, surgery should be delayed until excessive swelling has resolved, because swelling places the soft tissues at risk. Supine position with a thigh or ankle tourniquet is recommended. Be aware of and ready to address all injuries present before beginning surgery.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

A 2-incision approach works best for complete visualization. The medial incision is in line with the first webspace. The branches of the superficial peroneal nerve are identified and protected. The muscle belly of the extensor hallucis brevis covers the neurovascular bundle. Identify and protect the deep peroneal nerve, dorsalis pedis artery, and extensor tendons. Once the area of the second TMT joint is reached, perform subperiosteal dissection across the Lisfranc joint to minimize damage to soft-tissue structures. If needed, a second incision is based over the lateral border of the third MT and is carried distally. The extensor digitorum brevis is divided bluntly, and the TMTs are entered subperiosteally. In this region, the third, fourth, and fifth TMT joints literally are one on top of the other and are easily visualized.

With the tarsus stabilized and the joints inspected, reduction usually is easy. The author finds it easiest to reduce the medial column first, by placing a provisional wire across the first TMT joint and, if necessary, a provisional wire between the first and second cuneiform. If acceptable, appropriate cannulated screws are then placed. The second part of the procedure is connecting the medial and middle columns. A cannulated screw is placed across the medial cuneiform to the base of the second MT so as to reduce the Lisfranc diastasis. Other authors suggest starting with the second MT to medial cuneiform fixation. A large, pointed bone-reduction clamp can be used to hold the reduction while screws are placed. The position of the fixation screws is depicted in the image below.[30]

Postoperative lateral radiograph illustrates placePostoperative lateral radiograph illustrates placement of fixation screws for stabilization of Lisfranc joint.

Because no real tissue layers are present at this level of the foot, wound closure can be accomplished with an absorbable suture to close joint capsules and a nonabsorbable suture in using a vertical or horizontal mattress technique to close the skin.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Immediately postoperatively, the authors recommend a well-padded posterior splint until swelling subsides in 1-2 weeks. At that time, the splint can be converted to a non – weight-bearing, short leg cast if swelling permits. Immobilization in a cast is up to 3 months. The period of time that screws should remain is controversial, as is the question of whether weight bearing should be permitted before screws are removed. Physicians agree that screws across viable joints should be left in no longer than 6 months from the time of surgery. Some advocate that no weight bearing be allowed until the screws are removed, at 3 months after surgery.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

  • Remove sutures during the 2-week postoperative visit.
  • Patient should remain immobilized in a non – weight-bearing, short-leg cast until 6-8 weeks after surgery. At that time, as symptoms permit, the cast can be switched to a removable boot or walking cast for another 6 weeks.
  • During the 6-week postoperative visit, radiographically assess healing. If K-wires are used, they should be removed at the 6-week postsurgery follow-up visit.
  • Follow up on a monthly basis until full weight bearing is achieved.
  • Aftrer 4-6 months, remove fixation screws across the TMT joints. Allow weight bearing as tolerated in a supportive shoe with accommodative insole and carbon shank.
Previous
Next

Complications

The following factors can be considered complications of this injury:

  • Foot compartment syndrome after a major trauma
  • Nonanatomic reduction or alignment
  • Posttraumatic midfoot arthritis (most common)[31]
  • Painful hardware, hardware failure, or breakage
  • Flatfoot deformity with instability with weight bearing
  • Complex regional pain syndrome (only 2 cases reported)
  • Neuromas (usually the superficial peroneal nerve)
  • Infections and wound complications
  • Vascular injuries[32, 33]

Along this joint line, continued chronic pain with weight bearing is best treated with fusion of the first, second, and third TMT joints in an anatomically correct position. With realignment and stabilization of the medial joints, laterally based pain usually subsides.

Treat persistent lateral pain following realignment of the medial joints with interposition arthroplasty rather than fusion. This is best performed using a segment of extensor digitorum brevis tendon rolled up and interposed into the debrided joint. This allows continued motion and prevents the compressive bony contact that generates the pain (see images below).

Postoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstraPostoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates fixation of the metatarsal, as well as stabilization of the Lisfranc joint. Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstratPreoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates a missed old Lisfranc injury with subsequent valgus foot deformity and painful weight bearing throughout the midfoot. Preoperative lateral radiograph demonstrates loss Preoperative lateral radiograph demonstrates loss of plantar integrity through Lisfranc joint area. The normal linear alignment of the bones from the metatarsal to the talus is lost, with a sag at the tarsometatarsal joint. In this postoperative anteroposterior radiograph dIn this postoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrating reduction of Lisfranc alignment and screw configuration for tarsometatarsal fusion, note that only the medial 3 joints are fused. The lateral 2 joints remain mobile and actually open up when compared with the previous pictures.
Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Stable anatomic alignment is the best predictor of outcome.[34] The presence of fractures and/or articular destruction leads to poorer results, regardless of alignment. Incidence of posttraumatic arthritis reportedly ranges from 0-58%.[35] One study reported that up to 25% of patients develop posttraumatic arthritis even after fixation. This same study showed that there was no difference between acute and delayed (>6 weeks) surgical fixation. Purely ligamentous injuries seemed to have poorer outcomes. Good results are achieved with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) at up to 6 weeks, but poor outcomes are seen after this time due to articular destruction, malalignment, and poor soft-tissue envelope.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Role of acute fusion

Stability at this joint level of the foot is the primary concern, and instability appears to be the primary pain generator. Primary fusion of the medial 3 TMT joints has been advocated due to the unpredictability of adequate ligamentous healing to support the foot.

In 2006, Ly and colleagues reported the results of their study comparing primary arthrodesis with ORIF in primarily ligamentous Lisfranc injuries.[36, 37] Twenty patients were treated with ORIF, and 21 were treated with arthrodesis of the medial 2 or 3 TMT joints, with an average follow-up period of 42.5 months. Using outcome measures, the authors reported that the members of the arthrodesis group reached a postoperative activity level that was an estimated 92% of their pre-injury activity level, while in the ORIF group, members achieved an activity level that was only 65% of their pre-injury level. The authors concluded that a stable, primary arthrodesis seemed to have better short- and medium-term outcomes. Whether this improves long-term results is not yet known.

Length of time before screw removal

Suggestions of length of time that screws should remain in place range from 6 weeks to 3 months after weight bearing begins (up to 6 months from the time of surgery). Results demonstrate that if fixation screws remain in place indefinitely, they have a high tendency to break with time, thereby causing pain. If the joint is not fused purposely during surgery, then some motion is expected; this constant motion causes hardware failure.

The timing of screw removal remains a question. Advocates of early removal stress the fear of early screw failure as the main reason for removal. Others believe that the screws should remain in place even during early weight bearing to slowly help condition the damaged ligaments to resume supporting the foot. Long-term follow-up is needed before this issue can be resolved.

Use of different bio-absorbable materials

The advantage of using different bio-absorbable materials to provide short-term stability following surgical reduction is that no screws need to be removed. Issues are 2-fold:

  • What effect do degradation products have on joint chemistry?
  • Is the sheer strength of bio-absorbable screws sufficient to maintain the reduction in this situation?

In 2002, Thordarson and colleagues reported results from 14 patients at an average follow-up of 20 months. At this short-term follow-up they determined that bio-absorbable screws are safe and that they eliminate the need for screw removal. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the true efficacy.[38]

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Saul G Trevino, MD  Professor of Clinical Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Saul G Trevino, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Diabetes Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Clinical Orthopaedic Society, Mid-America Orthopaedic Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Allison M Wade, MD  Orthopedic Surgeon, Vero Orthopedics, Vero Neurology

Allison M Wade, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Florida Orthopaedic Society, Mid-America Orthopaedic Association, Southern Orthopaedic Association, and Tennessee Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John S Early, MD  Foot/Ankle Specialist, Texas Orthopaedic Associates, LLP; Co-Director, North Texas Foot and Ankle Fellowship, Baylor University Medical Center

John S Early, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: AO North America Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Osteotech Consulting fee Consulting; Stryker Consulting fee Consulting; Biomet Consulting fee Consulting; AO North America Grant/research funds fellowship funding; MMI inc Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Santaram Vallurupalli, MD  Resident Physician, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

David L Flood, MD  Assistant Professor of Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Sports Medicine and Arthroscopic Surgery Subspecialist, Clinic Director of Missouri Orthopaedic Institute at Capital Region Medical Center

David L Flood, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, California Orthopedic Association, and Western Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

James K DeOrio, MD  Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine

James K DeOrio, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Florida Medical Association, and German Society of Neurology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Shepard R Hurwitz, MD  Executive Director, American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery

Shepard R Hurwitz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Rheumatology, American College of Sports Medicine, American College of Surgeons, American Diabetes Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Eastern Orthopaedic Association, Orthopaedic Research Society, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Southern Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS  Frank J Kloenne Chair in Orthopedic Surgery, Professor and Chair, Department of Orthopedics, The Ohio State University Medical Center

Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Diabetes Association, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Missouri State Medical Association, Musculoskeletal Infection Society, Southern Medical Association, Southern Orthopaedic Association, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Henning JA, Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Bohay DR, Anderson JG. Open reduction internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis for lisfranc injuries: a prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Int. Oct 2009;30(10):913-22. [Medline].

  2. Schepers T, Kieboom B, van Diggele P, Patka P, Van Lieshout EM. Pedobarographic analysis and quality of life after Lisfranc fracture dislocation. Foot Ankle Int. Oct 2010;31(10):857-64. [Medline].

  3. Ahmed S, Bolt B, McBryde A. Comparison of standard screw fixation versus suture button fixation in Lisfranc ligament injuries. Foot Ankle Int. Oct 2010;31(10):892-6. [Medline].

  4. Panchbhavi VK, Vallurupalli S, Yang J, Andersen CR. Screw fixation compared with suture-button fixation of isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. May 2009;91(5):1143-8. [Medline].

  5. Brin YS, Nyska M, Kish B. Lisfranc injury repair with the TightRope device: a short-term case series. Foot Ankle Int. Jul 2010;31(7):624-7. [Medline].

  6. Lundeen G, Sara S. Technique tip: the use of a washer and suture endobutton in revision lisfranc fixation. Foot Ankle Int. Jul 2009;30(7):713-5. [Medline].

  7. Baravarian B, Geffen D. Lisfranc tightrope. Foot Ankle Spec. Oct 2009;2(5):249-50. [Medline].

  8. Watson TS, Shurnas PS, Denker J. Treatment of Lisfranc joint injury: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Dec 2010;18(12):718-28. [Medline].

  9. Kaar S, Femino J, Morag Y. Lisfranc joint displacement following sequential ligament sectioning. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 2007;89(10):2225-32. [Medline].

  10. Hardcastle PH, Reschauer R, Kutscha-Lissberg E, et al. Injuries to the tarsometatarsal joint. Incidence, classification and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64(3):349-56. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  11. Desmond EA, Chou LB. Current concepts review: Lisfranc injuries. Foot Ankle Int. Aug 2006;27(8):653-60. [Medline].

  12. Lattermann C, Goldstein JL, Wukich DK, et al. Practical management of Lisfranc injuries in athletes. Clin J Sport Med. Jul 2007;17(4):311-5. [Medline].

  13. Curtis MJ, Myerson M, Szura B. Tarsometatarsal joint injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 1993;21(4):497-502. [Medline].

  14. Kalia V, Fishman EK, Carrino JA, Fayad LM. Epidemiology, imaging, and treatment of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations revisited. Skeletal Radiol. Feb 2012;41(2):129-36. [Medline].

  15. Patillo D, Rudzki JR, Johnson JE, et al. Lisfranc injury in a national hockey league player: a case report. Int J Sports Med. Nov 2007;28(11):980-4. [Medline].

  16. Chilvers M, Donahue M, Nassar L, et al. Foot and ankle injuries in elite female gymnasts. Foot Ankle Int. Feb 2007;28(2):214-8. [Medline].

  17. Kadel N, Boenisch M, Teitz C, et al. Stability of Lisfranc joints in ballet pointe position. Foot Ankle Int. May 2005;26(5):394-400. [Medline].

  18. Bulut G, Yasmin D, Heybeli N, Erken HY, Yildiz M. A complex variant of Lisfranc joint complex injury. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Jul-Aug 2009;99(4):359-63. [Medline].

  19. Gaweda K, Tarczynska M, Modrzewski K, et al. An analysis of pathomorphic forms and diagnostic difficulties in tarso-metatarsal joint injuries. Int Orthop. Jun 15 [Epub ahead of print] 2007;[Medline].

  20. Perron AD, Brady WJ, Keats TE. Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: Lisfranc fracture-dislocation. Am J Emerg Med. Jan 2001;19(1):71-5. [Medline].

  21. Sherief TI, Mucci B, Greiss M. Lisfranc injury: how frequently does it get missed? And how can we improve?. Injury. Jul 2007;38(7):856-60. [Medline].

  22. Raikin SM, Elias I, Dheer S, Besser MP, Morrison WB, Zoga AC. Prediction of midfoot instability in the subtle Lisfranc injury. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with intraoperative findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 2009;91(4):892-9. [Medline].

  23. Woodward S, Jacobson JA, Femino JE, Morag Y, Fessell DP, Dong Q. Sonographic evaluation of Lisfranc ligament injuries. J Ultrasound Med. Mar 2009;28(3):351-7. [Medline].

  24. Nunley JA, Vertullo CJ. Classification, investigation, and management of midfoot sprains: Lisfranc injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 2002;30(6):871-8. [Medline].

  25. Watson TS, Shurnas PS, Denker J. Treatment of Lisfranc joint injury: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Dec 2010;18(12):718-28. [Medline].

  26. Sanli I, Hermus J, Poeze M. Primary internal fixation and soft-tissue reconstruction in the treatment for an open Lisfranc fracture-dislocation. Musculoskelet Surg. Jun 25 2011;[Medline].

  27. Smith SE, Camasta CA, Cass AD. A technique for isolated arthrodesis of the second metatarsocuneiform joint. J Foot Ankle Surg. Sep-Oct 2009;48(5):606-11. [Medline].

  28. Lee CA, Birkedal JP, Dickerson EA, et al. Stabilization of Lisfranc joint injuries: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. May 2004;25(5):365-70. [Medline].

  29. Panagakos P, Patel K, Gonzalez CN. Lisfranc arthrodesis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. Jan 2012;29(1):51-66. [Medline].

  30. Cook KD, Jeffries LC, O'Connor JP, Svach D. Determining the strongest orientation for "Lisfranc's screw" in transverse plane tarsometatarsal injuries: a cadaveric study. J Foot Ankle Surg. Jul-Aug 2009;48(4):427-31. [Medline].

  31. Gaines RJ, Wright G, Stewart J. Injury to the tarsometatarsal joint complex during fixation of Lisfranc fracture dislocations: an anatomic study. J Trauma. Apr 2009;66(4):1125-8. [Medline].

  32. Gaines RJ, Wright G, Stewart J. Injury to the tarsometatarsal joint complex during fixation of Lisfranc fracture dislocations: an anatomic study. J Trauma. Apr 2009;66(4):1125-8. [Medline].

  33. Williams JC, Roberts JW, Yoo BJ. Dorsalis pedis artery pseudoaneurysm after Lisfranc surgery. J Orthop Trauma. Nov 2010;24(11):e98-101. [Medline].

  34. Nithyananth M, Boopalan PR, Titus VT, Sundararaj GD, Lee VN. Long-term outcome of high-energy open Lisfranc injuries: a retrospective study. J Trauma. Mar 2011;70(3):710-6. [Medline].

  35. Philbin T, Rosenberg G, Sferra JJ. Complications of missed or untreated Lisfranc injuries. Foot Ankle Clin. Mar 2003;8(1):61-71. [Medline].

  36. Ly TV, Coetzee JC. Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 2006;88(3):514-20. [Medline].

  37. Coetzee JC, Ly TV. Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 2007;89 Suppl 2 Pt.1:122-7. [Medline].

  38. Thordarson DB, Hurvitz G. PLA screw fixation of Lisfranc injuries. Foot Ankle Int. Nov 2002;23(11):1003-7. [Medline].

  39. Alberta FG, Aronow MS, Barrero M, et al. Ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plate and transarticular screw fixation. Foot Ankle Int. Jun 2005;26(6):462-73. [Medline].

  40. Buzzard BM, Briggs PJ. Surgical management of acute tarsometatarsal fracture dislocation in the adult. Clin Orthop. Aug 1998;(353):125-33. [Medline].

  41. Chandran P, Puttaswamaiah R, Dhillon MS, et al. Management of complex open fracture injuries of the midfoot with external fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg. Sep-Oct 2006;45(5):308-15. [Medline].

  42. Coss HS, Manos RE, Buoncristiani A. Abduction stress and AP weightbearing radiography of purely ligamentous injury in the tarsometatarsal joint. Foot Ankle Int. Aug 1998;19(8):537-41. [Medline].

  43. Davies MS, Saxby TS. Intercuneiform instability and the "gap" sign. Foot Ankle Int. Sep 1999;20(9):606-9. [Medline].

  44. Faciszewski T, Burks RT, Manaster BJ. Subtle injuries of the Lisfranc joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 1990;72(10):1519-22. [Medline].

  45. Kuo RS, Tejwani NC, Digiovanni CW. Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc joint injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Nov 2000;82-A(11):1609-18. [Medline].

  46. Lui TH. Arthroscopic tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) arthrodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. May 2007;15(5):671-5. [Medline].

  47. Meyer SA, Callaghan JJ, Albright JP. Midfoot sprains in collegiate football players. Am J Sports Med. May-Jun 1994;22(3):392-401. [Medline].

  48. Myerson MS, Fisher RT, Burgess AR. Fracture dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints: end results correlated with pathology and treatment. Foot Ankle. Apr 1986;6(5):225-42. [Medline].

  49. Panchbhavi VK, Vallurupalli S, Yang J, Andersen CR. Screw fixation compared with suture-button fixation of isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. May 2009;91(5):1143-8. [Medline].

  50. Richter M, Thermann H, Wippermann B, et al. Foot fractures in restrained front seat car occupants: a long-term study over twenty-three years. J Orthop Trauma. May 2001;15(4):287-93. [Medline].

  51. Wilson DW. Injuries of the tarso-metatarsal joints. Etiology, classification and results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Nov 1972;54(4):677-86. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Previous
Next
 
Radiograph illustrating diabetic patient with first ray instability of the right foot. The articular surfaces of the second and first metatarsal are level in the transverse plane, indicating proximal migration of the first ray. The left foot shows the advanced stage of an untreated Lisfranc injury with similar first ray instability.
Clinical identification of typical plantar ecchymosis pattern observed in Lisfranc injuries.
In this anteroposterior radiograph of a Lisfranc dislocation, note the disruption of the normal second tarsometatarsal alignment.
In this lateral radiograph of a typical Lisfranc injury, note the malalignment of the metatarsal bases with the midfoot.
In this medial oblique radiograph of a normal foot, note the medial borders of the cuboid and fourth metatarsal base. They should be even, as depicted by the black lines.
In this medial oblique radiograph of a Lisfranc injury, note the loss of alignment between the cuboid and fourth metatarsal base (black lines). This is diagnostic of a Lisfranc injury and is as important as recognition of the second tarsometatarsal instability.
Stress view. This patient, with a suspected Lisfranc injury, presents with a normal appearing anteroposterior radiograph of the foot. Plantar ecchymosis and clinical presentation of pain warrant further investigation. In this radiograph, alignment of the medial border of the second metatarsal and the medial cuneiform is near normal. Patient is unable to bear weight due to a femur fracture sustained in the same accident.
In this stressed view, with adequate anesthesia to the patient, the foot is stressed in a medial/lateral plane. The forefoot is forced laterally with the hindfoot brought medially. Note that the second tarsometatarsal joint opens up, and the normal alignment between the medial border of the second metatarsal base and the middle cuneiform is distorted. This injury requires surgical stabilization.
Standard anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates a Lisfranc fracture dislocation. Determining the extent of fracture involving the joint is difficult with plain radiographs.
CT scan in the coronal plane can demonstrate the extent of injury at the joint. Compare with the plain radiograph of this injury in the related image. Note the plantar avulsion, suggesting severe disruption of the plantar ligamentous structures.
This diagram depicts the suggested fixation order of placement and alignment of screws for surgical fixation of unstable Lisfranc injuries.
Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates a Lisfranc dislocation.
Preoperative lateral radiograph demonstrates a Lisfranc dislocation.
Postoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates reduction and fixation of Lisfranc dislocation.
Postoperative lateral radiograph illustrates placement of fixation screws for stabilization of Lisfranc joint.
Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates a Lisfranc injury with proximal tarsal instability. The medial cuneiform is displaced medially, bringing the joint line level with the second. The proximal anatomy must be restored and stabilized before addressing the tarsometatarsal joint.
Postoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates restoration of normal midfoot alignment. Screw fixation was used to stabilize the cuneiform prior to realigning the Lisfranc joint. Due to comminution of the second and third metatarsal shafts, Kirschner wires were used to hold their position. In this case, due to continued instability, a wire through the fourth tarsometatarsal joint was also used.
Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates a Lisfranc injury with associated distal fracture. Note the displacement of the base of the first metatarsal.
Postoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates fixation of the metatarsal, as well as stabilization of the Lisfranc joint.
Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrates a missed old Lisfranc injury with subsequent valgus foot deformity and painful weight bearing throughout the midfoot.
Preoperative lateral radiograph demonstrates loss of plantar integrity through Lisfranc joint area. The normal linear alignment of the bones from the metatarsal to the talus is lost, with a sag at the tarsometatarsal joint.
In this postoperative anteroposterior radiograph demonstrating reduction of Lisfranc alignment and screw configuration for tarsometatarsal fusion, note that only the medial 3 joints are fused. The lateral 2 joints remain mobile and actually open up when compared with the previous pictures.
Postoperative lateral radiograph demonstrates restoration of alignment with tarsometatarsal fusion.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.